Re: list major languages first in anaconda

2020-10-22 Thread Christopher Engelhard
t English even though my other languages are well supported, because it means less mentally switching back and forth. Christopher ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org F

Re: sys/timeb.h removed in Rawhide?

2020-10-20 Thread Christopher
A quick Google search found this: https://github.com/bminor/glibc/commit/d6fa3170997b4af0a702eebdae7e4d3c57d74b65 It looks like glibc previously deprecated, and now removed it. You probably need to use gettimeofday or clock_gettime, as the note says. On Tue, Oct 20, 2020 at 10:27 PM Ron Olson

[EPEL-devel] Re: Fast-moving packages in EPEL

2020-10-15 Thread Christopher Engelhard
bserver module or cmd line. Thanks for the clarification, but you're right, that won't help here, as NC has extensive runtime PHP7.2+ dependencies. Christopher ___ epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to epel-devel-

[EPEL-devel] Re: Fast-moving packages in EPEL

2020-10-14 Thread Christopher Engelhard
n updated one on Copr instead. Thanks to all of you, you helped tremendously. Christopher ___ epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to epel-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduc

[EPEL-devel] Re: Fast-moving packages in EPEL

2020-10-13 Thread Christopher Engelhard
On 12.10.20 10:49, Leon Fauster wrote: > Not sure but IIRC EPEL should not depend on software collections ...? Can someone confirm that? If the package can't depend on php7.2+, then the question of how to deal with EPEL7 is moot. Christopher ___ e

[EPEL-devel] Re: Fast-moving packages in EPEL

2020-10-13 Thread Christopher Engelhard
hat simply follows upstream release channel (i.e. N+1.0 replaces N.x, even if N is still supported and receiving updates) in addition tonextcloud-. Or have a normal (ursine?) package for that. That way users can choose between an automatically updating or version-stable Nextcloud, and whatever they

[EPEL-devel] Re: Fast-moving packages in EPEL

2020-10-11 Thread Christopher Engelhard
und - see about creating nextcloud-XX and maybe nextcloud-latest modules for inclusion in epel8 - epel7: ??? Christopher ___ epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to epel-devel

[EPEL-devel] Re: Fast-moving packages in EPEL

2020-10-11 Thread Christopher Engelhard
I think most problems are going to be with database changes, and that's not really testable on an empty test install ... Christopher ___ epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to epel-d

[EPEL-devel] Re: Fast-moving packages in EPEL

2020-10-11 Thread Christopher Engelhard
updates to whenever CentOS/RHEL release a new version won't work either. I think I'll retire and look into re-adding it via modularity. Christopher ___ epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to epel-devel-le

[EPEL-devel] Re: Fast-moving packages in EPEL

2020-10-11 Thread Christopher Engelhard
el and would allow to update nextcloud at > users own pace. I'm sort of hesitant to dive into learning how modularity works, though ... although, maybe a good opportunity to learn. Christopher ___ epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@lists.fedoraproje

[EPEL-devel] Fast-moving packages in EPEL

2020-10-10 Thread Christopher Engelhard
on updates or is it better to retire it from EPEL? I suspect that EPEL users would probably prefer to run it from upstream's containers anyways, so retiring might make more sense, but I'm open either way. Christopher ___ epel-devel mailing list --

Re: F33 Workstation/btrfs: Can't reinstall while preserving /home

2020-10-10 Thread Christopher Engelhard
On 10.10.20 00:45, Chris Murphy wrote: > This might be a good Quick Doc candidate. > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Testcase_partitioning_custom_btrfs_preserve_home Good idea, I'll do that. Christopher ___ devel mailing list --

Re: F33 Workstation/btrfs: Can't reinstall while preserving /home

2020-10-10 Thread Christopher Engelhard
Deleting & recreating the subvolume works as expected, both in Blivet & Custom partitioning. We should probably change the error message from 'requires a new partition' to 'requires a new partition or btrfs subvolume' - that will make it clearer to users, I hope. I'll file a RFE bug for t

F33 Workstation/btrfs: Can't reinstall while preserving /home

2020-10-09 Thread Christopher Engelhard
of course wipe /home as well. Am I missing something? Christopher ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project

Re: mock, febootstrap, building chroots a.k.a. debootstrap

2020-10-07 Thread Christopher Engelhard
is (arch-chroot) as part of their arch-install-scripts [1][2]. Christopher [1] https://git.archlinux.org/arch-install-scripts.git/tree/arch-chroot.in [2] https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/lcts/easy-chroot/ ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fe

Non-responsive maintainer: ichavero

2020-09-30 Thread Christopher Engelhard
], although most of them were reported against older nextcloud versions. Last activity from commit history was three months ago. Does anyone know how to contact the maintainer? Christopher [0] https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Policy_for_nonresponsive_package_maintainers/ [1] https

Re: REAR and Fedora | Non-responsive maintainer

2020-09-22 Thread Christopher Engelhard
t updated to 2.6 over the weekend. Christopher ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-cond

Re: The Future of the Java Stack (also regarding ELN and RHEL)

2020-09-11 Thread Christopher
On Fri, Sep 11, 2020 at 2:02 PM Adam Williamson wrote: > > On Fri, 2020-09-11 at 12:44 +0300, Aleksandar Kurtakov wrote: > > On Fri, Sep 11, 2020 at 11:54 AM Tomasz Torcz wrote: > > > > > On Fri, Sep 11, 2020 at 10:16:02AM +0200, Mikolaj Izdebski wrote: > > > > You get a side tag in Koji where

Re: The Future of the Java Stack (also regarding ELN and RHEL)

2020-09-10 Thread Christopher
On Thu, Sep 10, 2020 at 11:08 AM Aleksandar Kurtakov wrote: > > > > On Thu, Sep 10, 2020 at 5:54 PM Vitaly Zaitsev via devel > wrote: >> >> On 10.09.2020 16:10, Aleksandar Kurtakov wrote: >> > Flatpak is way better suited for our use case and in addition gives us >> > access to a way bigger

Re: Manual intervention required: broken /etc/nsswitch.conf and /etc/resolv.conf for F33 early adopters

2020-09-10 Thread Christopher Engelhard
ort a bug. That > shouldn't be happening. I have this same issue on a system that was installed as F33 rawhide & is now F34 rawhide. I never touched those files, nor did I do anything that should have caused anything else to change them. I'll file a bug - would this be against au

Can a bugzilla issue be locked because of spam?

2020-08-30 Thread Christopher
This old issue (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1177202) keeps receiving spam every couple of weeks from a different account. I've been trying to flag the spam comments as spam, and remove the flags they keep setting, and remove their CC as well, so they don't get follow-ups and get

Re: Query on upgrading the Fedora package

2020-08-28 Thread Christopher Engelhard
available in the testing repo for those who like to try it early. Best, Christopher [1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/EPEL_Updates_Policy [2] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/EPEL/GuidelinesAndPolicies ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubs

Re: Query on upgrading the Fedora package

2020-08-28 Thread Christopher Engelhard
the build to the repositories. See here the documentation [1][2] for more info. Christopher [1] https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Updates_Policy/#bodhi-enabling [2] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Package_maintenance_guide ___ devel mailing lis

Re: Query on upgrading the Fedora package

2020-08-27 Thread Christopher Engelhard
y have the old EPEL builds) just merging master and building should work. If there are incompatibilities you can either adapt the spec after merging or deal with them with conditionals in the master spec file. Christopher ___ devel mailing list --

Re: RFC7919 Diffie-Hellman parameters in Fedora

2020-08-25 Thread Christopher Engelhard
default from the available groups should probably reside in crypto-policies. Christopher P.S.: I put the package I created to install various default DH groups on my systems on Copr, in case this is useful for anyone else: https://gitlab.com/lcts/crypto-groups https://copr.fedorainfracloud.or

Re: RFC7919 Diffie-Hellman parameters in Fedora

2020-08-24 Thread Christopher Engelhard
On 24.08.20 18:43, Simo Sorce wrote: > On Fri, 2020-08-21 at 16:13 +0200, Christopher Engelhard wrote: > We already are making it easier in some ways, but feel free to open a > bug if there are specific components you are worried about. What ways are that? I'm not worried about any

Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers

2020-08-24 Thread Christopher Engelhard
ed, I can take these. Christopher ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelin

Re: RFC7919 Diffie-Hellman parameters in Fedora

2020-08-23 Thread Christopher Engelhard
lly removes some potential security issues while not introducing attack vectors that we already deem not significant (in default configurations - what anyone deems significant for their own system is of course entirely their business). Christopher [1] for a given definition of simple - RFC7919 prime

RFC7919 Diffie-Hellman parameters in Fedora

2020-08-21 Thread Christopher Engelhard
. change the desired group size. Best, Christopher [1] https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7919 [2] https://wiki.mozilla.org/index.php?title=Security/Server_Side_TLS ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to

Re: Questions about the 'request-branch' experience

2020-08-19 Thread Christopher
On Wed, Aug 19, 2020 at 9:12 AM Scott Talbert wrote: > > On Wed, 19 Aug 2020, Christopher wrote: > > > 1. Do I need epel8-playground? I want to keep the task of maintenance > > simple, and I don't want to deal with another branch to think about. I > > don't want choic

Re: Questions about the 'request-branch' experience

2020-08-19 Thread Christopher
On Wed, Aug 19, 2020 at 4:07 AM Petr Pisar wrote: > > On Tue, Aug 18, 2020 at 11:15:14PM -0400, Christopher wrote: > > I was recently asked to provide an EPEL8 version of one of my packages > > (python-keyring) in a bugzilla, so I did: > > fedpkg request-branch epel8 &g

Questions about the 'request-branch' experience

2020-08-18 Thread Christopher
in the spec file, if necessary). Sorry if these questions have been asked before. I could not easily find concise answers to these questions pertaining to the overall `fedpkg request-branch` experience.. Thanks, Christopher ___ devel mailing list -- devel

Re: Media key support in F32 / Gnome / systemd

2020-08-08 Thread Christopher
On Sat, Aug 8, 2020 at 2:57 PM Samuel Sieb wrote: > > On 8/8/20 11:30 AM, Christopher wrote: > > Thanks for the sanity check and for setting me on the right path. This > > isn't a great user experience, but at least it is *possible* to > > configure things the way I want.

Re: Media key support in F32 / Gnome / systemd

2020-08-08 Thread Christopher
On Sat, Aug 8, 2020 at 1:38 PM Samuel Sieb wrote: > > On 8/8/20 3:52 AM, Christopher wrote: > > Does anybody know what the current state of media key support is in > > F32 / Gnome / systemd? > > Is it currently broken? > > It works great. That wasn't my ex

Media key support in F32 / Gnome / systemd

2020-08-08 Thread Christopher
Does anybody know what the current state of media key support is in F32 / Gnome / systemd? Is it currently broken? I recently bought a Logitech MK270 wireless mouse/keyboard (pretty common), which has a "power" media key, which seems to put my Fedora 32 system to sleep, and it doesn't seem to be

Re: Proposal to Add: Log In/Out Blocker Criteria

2020-08-04 Thread Christopher Engelhard
As usual, the devil is in the details. Christopher ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ Lis

Re: Proposal to Add: Log In/Out Blocker Criteria

2020-08-04 Thread Christopher Engelhard
On 04.08.20 10:47, Miro Hrončok wrote: > I would even go further and remove the "with multiple user accounts" > condition. Even on a singe user system, I'd like to be able to log out > and back in again. +1 on that. Christopher ___

Re: Fedora 33 System-Wide Change proposal: Make btrfs the default file system for desktop variants

2020-07-09 Thread Christopher Engelhard
On 08.07.20 23:47, Adam Williamson wrote: > I think it's `efibootmgr -b -L DefinitelyNotFedora`, where is > the number of the entry called 'Fedora', which you could find by just > running `efibootmgr` to get a list of entries. -b selects the entry to > operate on and -L changes the

Re: The future of legacy BIOS support in Fedora.

2020-07-04 Thread Christopher Engelhard
On 04.07.20 17:59, Lennart Poettering wrote: > btw, sd-boot has a few tricks up its sleeve: if during boot you keep > "w" pressed down it will automatically boot into windows, similar if > you keep "l" pressed down it will automaticall boot into linux, "a" > will boot into macos, all without

Re: The future of legacy BIOS support in Fedora.

2020-07-03 Thread Christopher Engelhard
Can we maybe not restart this entire debate? i686 in Fedora has run down the curtain and joined the choir invisible. Whether we think that was the correct decision or not, there is absolutely no point in rehashing all the original arguments, let alone in a thread about BIOS support. Christopher

Re: booting successfully with read-only file system

2020-07-02 Thread Christopher Engelhard
this and report bugs. I'll try to solve any > that relate to systemd. The systemd version with udev.blockdev-read-only > is not released yet, but is available from koji ci builds [11]. Thanks for working on this, I will definitely give it a try myself. Christopher __

Re: Fedora 33 System-Wide Change proposal: Make btrfs the default file system for desktop variants

2020-07-01 Thread Christopher Engelhard
I like this approach, a lot. I'm all in favour of switching to btrfs (I've been using it for a while, on server & desktop), and I think this would be a safe approach to do so. Christopher On 01.07.20 20:24, Matthew Miller wrote: > On Wed, Jul 01, 2020 at 06:54:02AM +, Zbigniew Jędrz

Re: [EPEL] rpmconf question for EPEL7 on Amazon Linux 2

2020-07-01 Thread Christopher
On Wed, Jul 1, 2020 at 4:52 AM Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote: > > On Tue, Jun 30, 2020 at 2:18 PM Christopher > wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > I know Fedora doesn't directly support Amazon Linux, but I was > > wondering if the package maintainer for rpmconf on EPE

[EPEL] rpmconf question for EPEL7 on Amazon Linux 2

2020-06-30 Thread Christopher
possible to use '>=3.6' instead, and the package maintainer is willing to update it so it works with python 3.7 on Amazon Linux 2, that would be great for my use case. Regards, Christopher ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.

Re: Fedora 33 System-Wide Change proposal: Make nano the default editor

2020-06-26 Thread Christopher Engelhard
uck in vi. Christopher ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelin

Re: Fedora Packager Dashboard available for testing

2020-06-24 Thread Christopher Engelhard
happens for dashboards of non-existent accounts: https://packager.fedorainfracloud.org/xxyyzz Christopher On 23.06.20 18:28, Josef Skladanka wrote: > Hi, > > We'd like to announce public testing of the Packager Dashboard - a new > service for Fedora package maintainers aiming to provide

Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers (~200 nodejs packages to be retired in 2 days)

2020-06-22 Thread Christopher Engelhard
It was orphaned, due to lack of time [1]. I'd be happy to take it. Best, Christopher [1] https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/thread/XCLRSHRQBJRW5FPGIMBGOIH2KYLVSBNH/#XCLRSHRQBJRW5FPGIMBGOIH2KYLVSBNH ___ devel

Re: Packagers with no corresponding valid bugzilla accounts

2020-06-16 Thread Christopher
On Tue, Jun 16, 2020 at 11:10 AM Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: > > On Tue, Jun 16, 2020 at 11:05:00AM -0400, Christopher wrote: > >Why aren't the packager accounts linked to their FAS account alias? > >[1]fa...@fedoraproject.org ? I've been annoyed by FAS-linked services &g

Re: Packagers with no corresponding valid bugzilla accounts

2020-06-16 Thread Christopher
Why aren't the packager accounts linked to their FAS account alias? fa...@fedoraproject.org ? I've been annoyed by FAS-linked services trying to use my forwarding address for my account id rather than my FAS user id. My forwarding address is subject to change, but the FAS email alias is static.

Re: Fedora 33 System-Wide Change proposal: Fedora-Retired-Packages

2020-06-16 Thread Christopher Engelhard
from the user perspective, and will make it much harder to identify problems. A question regarding this: What would happen if an update to fedora-retired-packages obsoletes a package that is present on my system but listed in dnf's excludepkgs? Christopher

Re: Bodhi: "how to install" is supposed to work?

2020-06-02 Thread Christopher Engelhard
or mirrors to synchronize and try again. This should normally not take longer than . Christopher ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: htt

Re: Bodhi: "how to install" is supposed to work?

2020-06-02 Thread Christopher Engelhard
lly takes a bit of time for the mirrors pick up the update, other than that it should work. What error are you getting? Christopher ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.

Re: Modularity survey - results

2020-05-19 Thread Christopher
Interesting that the survey shows that the most common response was that people use it "not at all" and the overall response was negative, but the reaction to that is, "improve the docs" and "works as intended". Am I the only one who thinks that the people pushing modularity aren't listening to

Re: Re-Launching the Java SIG

2020-05-13 Thread Christopher Engelhard
immediately crashed, whereas the "official binaries" worked. That is just incredibly broken. Things like this are the reason why I think the build-from-source principle is important, regardless of the inconvience it undeniably causes. Christopher ___

Re: Can we distribute modular .repo files in a separate package?

2020-05-06 Thread Christopher
On Wed, May 6, 2020 at 9:13 AM Miro Hrončok wrote: > > Hello, as a Fedora user, who doesn't consume any modules, I'd like an easy way > to disable modular repos to save some traffic (both for myself and on the > mirrors). > > Disclaimer: I do not propose to change any defaults, just the delivery

Re: Grub, EFI, and SELinux

2020-05-02 Thread Christopher
On Fri, May 1, 2020 at 12:03 PM Jerry James wrote: > > On Fri, May 1, 2020 at 7:55 AM Christopher wrote: > > Can anybody tell me why the grub package seems to want to label files > > on the EFI partition during updates? > > I had thought that, by definition, EFI parti

Grub, EFI, and SELinux

2020-05-01 Thread Christopher
for the first time, awhile back, but I figured it was harmless and would be fixed eventually. However, since it has been happening for months on F31, and still is happening on F32 now that I've upgraded, I'm wondering if there's a good reason why it's trying to do this. Thanks, Christopher

Re: f32-backgrounds look like crap

2020-04-17 Thread Christopher Engelhard
On 17.04.20 16:07, Kamil Paral wrote: > Especially the one in Fedora 15 (GNOME edition) and 16 was outstanding. > Can we do more of those, please? Not weighing in on the merits of the current art, but 16 is still my favourite default artwork of any distro, ever.

Re: Fedora 33 System-Wide Change proposal: systemd-resolved

2020-04-15 Thread Christopher
On Wed, Apr 15, 2020 at 5:31 AM Tom Hughes via devel wrote: > > On 15/04/2020 10:14, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote: > > On 14.04.2020 21:23, Ben Cotton wrote: > >> Enable systemd-resolved by default. glibc will perform name resolution > >> using nss-resolve rather than nss-dns. > > > > I've

Re: v4l2loopback kernel module in Fedora?

2020-04-07 Thread Christopher
On Tue, Apr 7, 2020 at 6:06 AM Iñaki Ucar wrote: > > On Tue, 7 Apr 2020 at 05:58, Christopher wrote: > > > > If I get the motivation, I'll file a bug against the RPMFusion package. > > Here's the bug tracker: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/ Thanks. > > > As

Re: v4l2loopback kernel module in Fedora?

2020-04-06 Thread Christopher
On Mon, Apr 6, 2020 at 1:00 PM stan via devel wrote: > > On Sun, 5 Apr 2020 21:44:16 -0400 > Christopher wrote: > > > I'm probably going to abandon the effort anyway. obs-studio in Fedora > > crashes constantly every time I try to change the settings and save, > >

Re: v4l2loopback kernel module in Fedora?

2020-04-06 Thread Christopher
On Mon, Apr 6, 2020 at 5:35 AM Momčilo Medić wrote: > > On Mon, 2020-04-06 at 04:40 -0400, Christopher wrote: > > On Mon, Apr 6, 2020 at 3:59 AM Iñaki Ucar > > wrote: > > > On Mon, 6 Apr 2020 at 03:53, Christopher < > > > ctubb...@fedoraproject.org

Re: v4l2loopback kernel module in Fedora?

2020-04-06 Thread Christopher
On Mon, Apr 6, 2020 at 3:59 AM Iñaki Ucar wrote: > > On Mon, 6 Apr 2020 at 03:53, Christopher wrote: > > > > The previous packaging was on COPR, but it appears abandoned, probably > > because it's kind of worthless if it's not signed. And, it's a lot of > > manual

Re: v4l2loopback kernel module in Fedora?

2020-04-05 Thread Christopher
On Sun, Apr 5, 2020 at 4:45 PM Iñaki Ucar wrote: > > On Sun, 5 Apr 2020 at 22:23, Christopher wrote: > > > > On Sun, Apr 5, 2020 at 3:20 PM Iñaki Ucar wrote: > > > > > > On Sun, 5 Apr 2020 at 11:08, Leigh Scott wrote: > > > > > > > &g

Re: v4l2loopback kernel module in Fedora?

2020-04-05 Thread Christopher
On Sun, Apr 5, 2020 at 12:13 PM stan via devel wrote: > > On Sun, 5 Apr 2020 02:56:08 -0400 > Christopher wrote: > > > Has anyone tried packaging v4l2loopback into Fedora? I'd really like > > to set up a screen capture device for video conferencing stuff, but I > &

Re: v4l2loopback kernel module in Fedora?

2020-04-05 Thread Christopher
On Sun, Apr 5, 2020 at 3:20 PM Iñaki Ucar wrote: > > On Sun, 5 Apr 2020 at 11:08, Leigh Scott wrote: > > > > Aren't external kernel modules banned by fedora packaging rules? > > Yes, they are: >

v4l2loopback kernel module in Fedora?

2020-04-05 Thread Christopher
-maintain, if the package maintenance were sufficiently simple. Thanks, Christopher ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https

Re: %bcond_with/%bcond_without

2020-04-03 Thread Christopher Engelhard
On 03.04.20 22:36, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > So... could we please get a way to express this in rpm with a sane syntax: > > %define_cond docs 0%{?fedora} > 0 Oh please, yes. Christopher ___ devel mailing l

Re: Coronavirus: Fedora RTC solutions and YOU

2020-03-30 Thread Christopher Engelhard
of tools and would love to be a > little involved as potentially a co-maintainer but definitely a > tester... Same here. I don't have much experience with Java, but if I can help with packaging in any way, let me know. Christopher _

Re: Non-responsive maintainer check for libffi maintainer

2020-02-24 Thread Christopher Engelhard
a bit more experience would offer to co-maintain. Alternatively, you can just add me (lcts) as a co-maintainer. Christopher ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedor

Re: Seeking the maintainer of dbus-python

2020-02-12 Thread Christopher Engelhard
On 2/12/2020 11:01 AM, Vojtěch Trefný wrote: > If nobody wants to maintain this package I can do that. It's definitely > easier than rewriting our code to something else. I can take it, or co-maintain, whichever works for you. christopher ___

Re: Pymol is broken on Fedora 31

2019-12-07 Thread Christopher Engelhard
On 07.12.19 12:46, Antonio Trande wrote: > I'm interested. > I'd be happy to co-maintain, if desired. > On 07/12/19 12:20, Miro Hrončok wrote: >> On 07. 12. 19 11:53, Henrique Castro wrote: >>> Hello! >>> Pymol is a package that, integrated with python-rdkit and other python >>> packages, makes

Re: Potential module for wxGTK3.1 unstable series / Audacity

2019-11-11 Thread Christopher Engelhard
s against the default repo version of wxGTK, i.e. 3.0.4, so it does not seem to be required. Christopher [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/audacity-git/ (ignore stated pkg version, package pulls master on install) ___ devel mailing list

Re: Modularity: The Official Complaint Thread

2019-11-07 Thread Christopher Engelhard
here (2) cannot be achieved, we use compat packages as before though I freely admit that I absolutely cannot judge how difficult that is to actually implement. Christopher *i.e. for most desktop users or anyone for whom computers are tools rather

Re: Self-Introduction: Christopher Engelhard

2019-10-21 Thread Christopher Engelhard
On 10/20/2019 11:28 AM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > Hi Christopher, > > welcome to Fedora. sshguard review is more than enough for a first package, > quite a complicated beast. I'll sponsor you into the packager group. > > Zbyszek Hi, sorry for the late repl

SOLVED Re: case sensitive problems building packages (this case, PyVISA)

2019-10-20 Thread Christopher Beck
On Sunday, October 20, 2019 12:34:28 PM CEST Miro Hrončok wrote: > On 19. 10. 19 19:05, Christopher Beck wrote:> I used some like the one in > the attachment. One modification was in line 70 as > > > it can be seen here, to have the correct case-sensitive writing of > >

Re: case sensitive problems building packages (this case, PyVISA)

2019-10-19 Thread Christopher Beck
On Thursday, October 17, 2019 10:58:42 AM CEST Miro Hrončok wrote: > On 16. 10. 19 19:57, Christopher Beck wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > I am trying to build PyVISA (https://pyvisa.readthedocs.io/en/latest/) > > using mock and the problem is, during the build it is lo

Re: Fedora 32 System-Wide Change proposal: Modules in Non-Modular Buildroot

2019-10-18 Thread Christopher Engelhard
icts:' What I like about this approach that all this magic only comes into play when resolving dependencies. In all other circumstances they are packages like any other, and are treated as such. Christopher [1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1756582 [2] https://

case sensitive problems building packages (this case, PyVISA)

2019-10-16 Thread Christopher Beck
ut the problem seems to be the same (regardless to say I wonder how that guy there built this RPM of PyVISA). Best Regards Christopher [1]: https://github.com/fedora-python/pyp2rpm/issues/22 ___ python-devel mailing list -- python-devel@lists.fedoraprojec

Re: Packaging graph-tool: help speeding up build

2019-10-15 Thread Christopher Engelhard
On 14.10.19 23:07, Ankur Sinha wrote: > Out of curiosity, how long did the build take on your machine there? Almost 3 hours. Christopher ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel

Re: Packaging graph-tool: help speeding up build

2019-10-14 Thread Christopher Engelhard
hreading into the mix and this will easily add up to the memory usage you're seeing (It totally killed my test server, that's for sure. I have no idea what hardware koji is using, so even single-threaded, this might be an issue, but I'd still give it a try. Christopher P.S.: The linked spec f

Self-Introduction: Christopher Engelhard

2019-10-01 Thread Christopher Engelhard
Hi all, since I recently submitted my package for sshguard [1] for review [2], this is probably a good time to introduce myself (some of you might remember me from the packaging list). I'm also looking for a sponsor, assuming the package is positively reviewed. I"m Christopher, 35yr old,

Re: Defining the future of the packager workflow in Fedora

2019-09-26 Thread Christopher
On Thu, Sep 26, 2019 at 8:33 AM Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: > > Good Morning Everyone, > > At Flock, a few of us met to discuss a future vision of the packager workflow. > This discussion was triggered by the realization that a number of initiatives > are happening around packaging in Fedora but

Fwd: Fedora Notifications Digest (2 updates)

2019-09-21 Thread Christopher
Why do sometimes notifications have empty message lines like the following? -- Forwarded message - From: Date: Fri, Sep 20, 2019 at 10:10 PM Subject: Fedora Notifications Digest (2 updates) To: Digest Summary: 1. 2.

Re: Fedora Workstation and disabled by default firewall

2019-09-02 Thread Christopher
On Tue, Sep 3, 2019 at 12:26 AM John Harris wrote: > There is not a single service in Fedora that is broken by the firewall > running. You simply have to open the port before it can be accessed from a > remote system, which is by design. Basic access control, a security feature. Exactly.

Re: Fedora Workstation and disabled by default firewall

2019-08-29 Thread Christopher
On Thu, Aug 29, 2019 at 2:18 PM Japheth Cleaver wrote: > > On 8/29/2019 8:10 AM, Adam Williamson wrote: > > On Wed, 2019-08-28 at 23:13 -0400, Christopher wrote: > >> On Wed, Aug 28, 2019 at 8:56 PM John Harris wrote: > >>> It might be okay to be a GNOME-specif

Re: Fedora Workstation and disabled by default firewall

2019-08-29 Thread Christopher
On Thu, Aug 29, 2019 at 4:12 PM Chris Murphy wrote: > > On Thu, Aug 29, 2019 at 12:24 AM Chris Murphy wrote: > > > > Debian has a permissive firewall > > https://wiki.debian.org/DebianFirewall > > And Ubuntu, Mint, elementary, MX Linux, Solus, pop!_OS, as well. By > permissive, they all accept

Re: Fedora Workstation and disabled by default firewall

2019-08-28 Thread Christopher
On Thu, Aug 29, 2019 at 1:08 AM John Harris wrote: > > On Wednesday, August 28, 2019 10:00:35 PM MST Christopher wrote: > > No, the default firewalld zone affects all Fedora Workstation users, > > because firewalld runs outside of GNOME. Just because a user uses the >

Re: Fedora Workstation and disabled by default firewall

2019-08-28 Thread Christopher
On Wed, Aug 28, 2019 at 11:23 PM John Harris wrote: > > On Wednesday, August 28, 2019 8:13:59 PM MST Christopher wrote: > > The default firewall config affects every user of that edition, even > > if they never use GNOME (or even use graphical boot). So, I don't know > > i

Re: Fedora Workstation and disabled by default firewall

2019-08-28 Thread Christopher
On Wed, Aug 28, 2019 at 8:56 PM John Harris wrote: > > On Wednesday, August 28, 2019 5:46:58 PM MST Christopher wrote: > > A similar idea that would keep it separate from the installer might be > > to offer a dialogue as a "first-boot" action, but that seems like it'd

Re: Debates/back and forths

2019-08-28 Thread Christopher
On Wed, Aug 28, 2019 at 7:04 AM Danny Lee wrote: > > Hi all, > > I'm new to the devel list and fedora in general, but i was wondering if > these kind of back and forths between a few people is a frequent > occurrence. I came to Fedora to volunteer what little spare time I have > to help the

Re: Fedora Workstation and disabled by default firewall

2019-08-28 Thread Christopher
On Wed, Aug 28, 2019 at 6:52 PM Chris Murphy wrote: > > On Wed, Aug 28, 2019 at 12:57 PM Christopher > wrote: > > > > At the very least, it'd be nice if anaconda had an option to select > > the default firewalld zone during installation, > > A somewhat related f

Re: Fedora Workstation and disabled by default firewall

2019-08-28 Thread Christopher
On Wed, Aug 28, 2019 at 3:33 PM wrote: > > On Wed, Aug 28, 2019 at 9:56 PM, Christopher > wrote: > > 2) the Workstation WG has not only taken no action in response to the FESCo > statement of trust at the conclusion of our last lengthy discussion on this > matter, i

Re: Fedora Workstation and disabled by default firewall

2019-08-28 Thread Christopher
On Wed, Aug 28, 2019 at 1:01 PM Chris Murphy wrote: > > On Wed, Aug 28, 2019 at 9:36 AM John Harris wrote: > > > Essentially disabling the firewall falls under having a "bad design for > > everyone else". Disabling the firewall is something that could be considered > > hostile to the user. > >

Re: Fedora Workstation and disabled by default firewall

2019-08-27 Thread Christopher
On Tue, Aug 27, 2019 at 9:27 PM Chris Murphy wrote: > > On Tue, Aug 27, 2019 at 6:23 PM John Harris wrote: > > > > sshd was enabled by default back in F23, unless my install was completely > > broken. I wouldn't remember that well, unfortunately, as I've been running > > KDE > > since the end

Re: Fedora Workstation and disabled by default firewall

2019-08-26 Thread Christopher
On Mon, Aug 26, 2019 at 9:30 PM John Harris wrote: [SNIP] > I cannot imagine who approved this firewall configuration. This is broken. > This is a critical vulnerability, in my opinion. > I think "approved" is probably the wrong word: more like "pushed it through". FESCo explicitly rejected the

Re: Fedora Workstation and disabled by default firewall

2019-08-26 Thread Christopher
On Mon, Aug 26, 2019 at 9:08 AM wrote: > > > Well the thing is, blocknig ports tends to break applications that want to > use those ports. We're not going to do that, period. It also doesn't really > accomplish anything: either your app or service needs network access and you > have

Re: Workaround for missing gpg keys in mock?

2019-08-22 Thread Christopher
On Thu, Aug 22, 2019 at 9:03 PM Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote: > > On Thu, Aug 22, 2019 at 7:57 PM Christopher > wrote: > > > > I'm trying to do `fedpkg mock` to locally build some packages, and I > > keep getting errors about GPG keys not found for f31/f32 package

Workaround for missing gpg keys in mock?

2019-08-22 Thread Christopher
I'm trying to do `fedpkg mock` to locally build some packages, and I keep getting errors about GPG keys not found for f31/f32 packages. How do I work around this? ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to

Re: What does this koji error mean?

2019-08-21 Thread Christopher
On Tue, Aug 20, 2019 at 2:56 PM Jason L Tibbitts III wrote: > > >>>>> "C" == Christopher writes: > > C> BuildError: package thrift is > C> blocked for tag f32-updates-candidate > C> (https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=3718703

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >