Re: AArch64 support for container and flatpak builds

2020-12-10 Thread Clement Verna
On Thu, 10 Dec 2020 at 14:12, Jakub Cajka wrote: > > > > > - Original Message - > > From: "Mark O'Brien" > > To: devel-annou...@lists.fedoraproject.org, > devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > > Sent: Thursday, December 10, 2020 11:44:14 AM > > Subject: AArch64 support for container and

Summary/Minutes from today's FESCo Meeting (2020-12-09)

2020-12-10 Thread Clement Verna
= #fedora-meeting-2: FESCO (2020-12-09) = Meeting started by cverna at 15:00:20 UTC. The full logs are available athttps://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-2/2020-12-09/fesco.2020-12-09-15.00.log.html . Meeting

Schedule for Wednesday's FESCo Meeting (2020-12-09)

2020-12-09 Thread Clement Verna
Sorry for sending this late :) Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FESCo meeting Wednesday at 15:00UTC in #fedora-meeting-2 onirc.freenode.net. To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/UTCHowto or run: date -d '2020-12-09

Re: Fedora 34 Change: Make Fedora CoreOS a Fedora Edition (System-Wide Change)

2020-12-04 Thread Clement Verna
On Thu, 3 Dec 2020 at 20:42, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Thu, 2020-12-03 at 19:48 +0100, Clement Verna wrote: > > > > I think if we don't want to accept a different > > > > philosophy about release schedule and release engineering we can > > just > &g

Re: Fedora 34 Change: Make Fedora CoreOS a Fedora Edition (System-Wide Change)

2020-12-04 Thread Clement Verna
On Thu, 3 Dec 2020 at 20:32, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Thu, 2020-12-03 at 19:48 +0100, Clement Verna wrote: > > > [big snip] > > > To the outside > > > world, there is a strong impression that the thing called "Fedora" is a > > > product o

Re: Fedora 34 Change: GitRepos-master-to-main (Self-Contained Change)

2020-12-04 Thread Clement Verna
On Thu, 3 Dec 2020 at 21:01, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: > On Thu, Dec 03, 2020 at 04:56:09PM +0100, Clement Verna wrote: > >On Thu, 3 Dec 2020 at 16:21, Pierre-Yves Chibon <[1] > pin...@pingoured.fr> > >wrote: > > > > On Thu, Dec 03, 2020 at 04:

Re: Fedora 34 Change: Make Fedora CoreOS a Fedora Edition (System-Wide Change)

2020-12-03 Thread Clement Verna
On Wed, 2 Dec 2020 at 21:22, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Wed, 2020-12-02 at 19:42 +0100, Clement Verna wrote: > > > > > > CoreOS is going to be the same only worse, because it's not even built > > > the same way as the rest of Fedora. It's not built by Pungi, we don

Re: Fedora 34 Change: GitRepos-master-to-main (Self-Contained Change)

2020-12-03 Thread Clement Verna
On Thu, 3 Dec 2020 at 16:21, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: > On Thu, Dec 03, 2020 at 04:08:26PM +0100, Fabio Valentini wrote: > > On Thu, Dec 3, 2020 at 4:03 PM Ben Cotton wrote: > > > > > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/GitRepos-master-to-main > > > > > > == Summary == > > > > > > This

Re: Fedora 34 Change: Make Fedora CoreOS a Fedora Edition (System-Wide Change)

2020-12-02 Thread Clement Verna
On Wed, 2 Dec 2020 at 19:07, Ben Cotton wrote: > On Wed, Dec 2, 2020 at 12:22 PM Adam Williamson > wrote: > > > > So to boil this down into a representative question: when we are doing > > the Fedora 34 Go/No-Go meeting in ~four months' time, how do we decide > > whether to release "Fedora

Re: Fedora 34 Change: Make Fedora CoreOS a Fedora Edition (System-Wide Change)

2020-12-02 Thread Clement Verna
On Wed, 2 Dec 2020 at 18:27, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Wed, 2020-12-02 at 09:23 -0500, Ben Cotton wrote: > > > > == How To Test == > > See QA test cases : > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Category:CoreOS_Test_Cases > > > > We also have regular tests days, for example > >

Re: GitLab AMA Topic: Message Bus

2020-11-24 Thread Clement Verna
On Mon, 23 Nov 2020 at 21:31, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Mon, 2020-11-23 at 15:11 -0500, Neal Gompa wrote: > > > > > > I would highly recommend not creating message consumers that rely on > > > any particular message ordering because they're not going to work > > > properly, GitLab or not. > >

Re: GitLab AMA Topic: Message Bus

2020-11-23 Thread Clement Verna
On Wed, 18 Nov 2020 at 18:30, Fabio Valentini wrote: > On Mon, Nov 9, 2020 at 3:05 PM Aoife Moloney wrote: > > > > Hi everyone, > > > > I hope you enjoyed the F33 release party this weekend! Getting back to > > the GitLab topic mail threads, this weeks topic from the GitLab AMA > > session on

Re: Schedule for Wednesday's FESCo Meeting (2020-10-28)

2020-10-28 Thread Clement Verna
Works for me On Wed, 28 Oct 2020 at 09:05, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > On Tue, Oct 27, 2020 at 07:08:11PM -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > On Tue, Oct 27, 2020 at 09:18:34PM -0400, Neal Gompa wrote: > > > On Tue, Oct 27, 2020 at 8:52 PM David Cantrell > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > >

Re: [ELN] gcc is going to be updated to gcc11 in the ELN buildroot ahead of Rawhide

2020-10-23 Thread Clement Verna
On Fri, 23 Oct 2020 at 19:55, Neal Gompa wrote: > On Fri, Oct 23, 2020 at 1:07 PM Clement Verna > wrote: > > > > > > > > On Fri, 23 Oct 2020 at 17:20, Miro Hrončok wrote: > >> > >> On 10/23/20 2:45 PM, Aleksandra Fedorova wrote: > >>

Re: [ELN] gcc is going to be updated to gcc11 in the ELN buildroot ahead of Rawhide

2020-10-23 Thread Clement Verna
On Fri, 23 Oct 2020 at 17:20, Miro Hrončok wrote: > On 10/23/20 2:45 PM, Aleksandra Fedorova wrote: > > Sorry, but you just need to accept the fact that some _early > > development_ work in Fedora can happen without your decision on it. > > I except (and accept) that most of the development work

Re: [ELN] gcc is going to be updated to gcc11 in the ELN buildroot ahead of Rawhide

2020-10-23 Thread Clement Verna
On Thu, 22 Oct 2020 at 14:28, Aleksandra Fedorova wrote: > Hi, all, > > this is the informational message, no action required. > > Upon agreement between gcc maintainers and ELN SIG we would like to > switch ELN buildroot to use GCC11 ahead of Fedora Rawhide. > > Though ELN is defined as the

Re: Schedule for Wednesday's FESCo Meeting (2020-10-14) + Proposal to Cancel

2020-10-14 Thread Clement Verna
On Tue, 13 Oct 2020 at 21:49, Neal Gompa wrote: > On Tue, Oct 13, 2020 at 3:01 PM Fabio Valentini > wrote: > > > > Since there are no open tickets that are tagged with "meeting" and no new > > tickets are in need of synchronous discussion IMO, I propose to cancel > > tomorrow's meeting, and

Re: CPE Weekly: 2020-09-20

2020-10-13 Thread Clement Verna
On Mon, 12 Oct 2020 at 22:10, Aoife Moloney wrote: > > > On Mon, Oct 12, 2020 at 2:58 PM Clement Verna > wrote: > >> >> >> On Mon, 12 Oct 2020 at 10:09, Fabio Valentini >> wrote: >> >>> On Sun, Sep 20, 2020 at 10:33 PM Aoife Moloney

Re: bodhi updates stuck in "pending" state

2020-10-13 Thread Clement Verna
On Tue, 13 Oct 2020 at 11:34, Mattia Verga via devel < devel@lists.fedoraproject.org> wrote: > Il 12/10/20 19:54, Kevin Fenzi ha scritto: > > > >> Please see my post from a couple of weeks ago: >

Re: CPE Weekly: 2020-09-20

2020-10-12 Thread Clement Verna
On Mon, 12 Oct 2020 at 10:09, Fabio Valentini wrote: > On Sun, Sep 20, 2020 at 10:33 PM Aoife Moloney > wrote: > > GitLab > > Thank you so much to everyone for adding your questions to the doc for > > the GitLab AMA session on Thursday 10th September, and for your > > attendance on the day

Summary/Minutes from today's FESCo Meeting (2020-09-16)

2020-09-16 Thread Clement Verna
Minutes: https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-2/2020-09-16/fesco.2020-09-16-14.00.html Minutes (text): https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-2/2020-09-16/fesco.2020-09-16-14.00.txt Log:

Schedule for Wednesday's FESCo Meeting (2020-09-16)

2020-09-15 Thread Clement Verna
Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FESCo meeting Wednesday at 14:00UTC in #fedora-meeting-2 on irc.freenode.net. To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/UTCHowto or run: date -d '2020-09-16 14:00 UTC' Links to all issues to

Re: Gitlab Ask Me Anything - Sept 10th, 13:30 UTC

2020-09-09 Thread Clement Verna
On Wed, 9 Sep 2020 at 10:30, Julen Landa Alustiza wrote: > > > 20/9/4 17:27(e)an, Aoife Moloney igorleak idatzi zuen: > > > > > - A discussion on forum.gitlab.com at: > > > https://forum.gitlab.com/t/fedora-migration-to-gitlab-ask-me-anything-ama-thursday-september-10-2020/41971 > > > > Er, The

Re: docker.io/library/fedora:rawhide outdated vs registry.fp.org/fedora:rawhide

2020-08-26 Thread Clement Verna
On Wed, 19 Aug 2020 at 19:19, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote: > On Wed, Aug 19, 2020 at 05:07:52PM +0200, Clement Verna wrote: > > On Wed, 19 Aug 2020 at 14:02, Daniel P. Berrangé > > wrote: > > > > > I have a docker recipe that does not much more than: > > >

Re: docker.io/library/fedora:rawhide outdated vs registry.fp.org/fedora:rawhide

2020-08-19 Thread Clement Verna
On Wed, 19 Aug 2020 at 14:02, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote: > I have a docker recipe that does not much more than: > > FROM fedora:rawhide > RUN dnf -y install ...blah... > > Long story short the docker hub requires a PR to a github repo to update the image, this PR is reviewed and merged by a

Re: fedpkg update: Could not locate column in row for column 'comments.id'"

2020-08-14 Thread Clement Verna
On Fri, 14 Aug 2020 at 01:08, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Thu, 2020-08-13 at 18:46 -0400, Chris wrote: > > Hi guys, > > > > I'm going through the typical routine of pushing my repository up to EPEL > > (fc33, fc32, fc31, and epel8)... all goes smoothly until this command: > > > > fedpkg update

Schedule for Wednesday's FESCo Meeting (2020-07-01)

2020-06-30 Thread Clement Verna
Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FESCo meeting Wednesday at 14:00UTC in #fedora-meeting-2 on irc.freenode.net. To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/UTCHowto or run: date -d '2020-07-01 14:00 UTC' Links to all issues to

Re: fedora-minimal container and registry negative feedback

2020-06-30 Thread Clement Verna
On Mon, 29 Jun 2020 at 16:55, Dridi Boukelmoune wrote: > > The blank pages are flatpaks. We are using the same registry for > containers and flatpaks and the upstream project[0] used for registry.fp.o > does not support flatpaks so the page is just blank. > > That can't be right, fedora-minimal

Re: fedora-minimal container and registry negative feedback

2020-06-29 Thread Clement Verna
On Mon, 29 Jun 2020 at 12:59, Dridi Boukelmoune wrote: > > > microdnf reinstall tzdata > > > > There's a bug about this to split out the UTC tzdata into a minimal > > tzdata so terrible hacks aren't needed to slim things down. > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1722233 > > I'll

Re: Bodhi 5.4.0 in production

2020-06-23 Thread Clement Verna
On Tue, 23 Jun 2020 at 12:32, Vít Ondruch wrote: > > Dne 23. 06. 20 v 9:23 Hans de Goede napsal(a): > > Hi, > > > > On 6/22/20 9:53 AM, Clement Verna wrote: > >> Hi all, > >> > >> I have just deployed Bodhi 5.4.0 > >> (https://github.

Re: Bodhi 5.4.0 in production

2020-06-23 Thread Clement Verna
On Tue, 23 Jun 2020 at 12:11, Fabio Valentini wrote: > On Mon, Jun 22, 2020 at 9:58 AM Clement Verna > wrote: > > > > Hi all, > > > > I have just deployed Bodhi 5.4.0 ( > https://github.com/fedora-infra/bodhi/releases) in production. We were > run

Re: Bodhi 5.4.0 in production

2020-06-23 Thread Clement Verna
On Tue, 23 Jun 2020 at 09:24, Hans de Goede wrote: > Hi, > > On 6/22/20 9:53 AM, Clement Verna wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > I have just deployed Bodhi 5.4.0 ( > https://github.com/fedora-infra/bodhi/releases) in production. We were > running 5.2.2 so that deployme

Bodhi 5.4.0 in production

2020-06-22 Thread Clement Verna
Hi all, I have just deployed Bodhi 5.4.0 ( https://github.com/fedora-infra/bodhi/releases) in production. We were running 5.2.2 so that deployment brings the improvement and bug fixes from 5.3.0 and 5.4.0 (see release notes) One high level feature worth noting : * you can now associate BZ

Re: Update ejected from the push

2020-06-22 Thread Clement Verna
On Thu, 18 Jun 2020 at 18:35, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > On Thu, Jun 18, 2020 at 07:55:21AM +0200, Alexander Ploumistos wrote: > > These updates, along with a couple of others I submitted 12h ago, just > > appeared in my local mirror. Bodhi still shows everything as > > transitioning from pending to

Re: Day one of the datacenter service migration

2020-06-09 Thread Clement Verna
On Tue, 9 Jun 2020 at 16:29, Charalampos Stratakis wrote: ... snip > > > The elections app seems to be broken for me though, so I can't vote at > this point. > This is now fixed so you should be able to vote :-). > > -- > Regards, > > Charalampos Stratakis > Software Engineer > Python

Orphaning python-tgext-crud

2020-06-01 Thread Clement Verna
Hi all, I have just orphaned python-tgext-crud[0], as far as I can tell this package is not a dependency of any other package. $ sudo repoquery --whatdepends python3-tgext-crud There are currently 2 open bz for it [1] [0] - https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-tgext-crud [1] -

Re: Help needed with Fedora Python Classroom Lab container image

2020-05-27 Thread Clement Verna
On Wed, 27 May 2020 at 10:09, Miro Hrončok wrote: > On 27. 05. 20 9:12, Clement Verna wrote: > > > > > > On Wed, 27 May 2020 at 01:23, Miro Hrončok > <mailto:mhron...@redhat.com>> wrote: > > > > Hello. > > > > There is

Re: Help needed with Fedora Python Classroom Lab container image

2020-05-27 Thread Clement Verna
On Wed, 27 May 2020 at 10:09, Miro Hrončok wrote: > On 27. 05. 20 9:12, Clement Verna wrote: > > > > > > On Wed, 27 May 2020 at 01:23, Miro Hrončok > <mailto:mhron...@redhat.com>> wrote: > > > > Hello. > > > > There is

Re: Help needed with Fedora Python Classroom Lab container image

2020-05-27 Thread Clement Verna
On Wed, 27 May 2020 at 01:23, Miro Hrončok wrote: > Hello. > > There is a docker/podman container image part of the Fedora Python > Classroom Lab: > >https://labs.fedoraproject.org/en/python-classroom > > I need help with two main issues: > > > 1) The container doesn't built for Fedora 32: >

Re: Help needed with Fedora Python Classroom Lab container image

2020-05-27 Thread Clement Verna
On Wed, 27 May 2020 at 01:23, Miro Hrončok wrote: > Hello. > > There is a docker/podman container image part of the Fedora Python > Classroom Lab: > >https://labs.fedoraproject.org/en/python-classroom > > I need help with two main issues: > > > 1) The container doesn't built for Fedora 32: >

Re: Help needed with Fedora Python Classroom Lab container image

2020-05-27 Thread Clement Verna
On Wed, 27 May 2020 at 02:28, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Wed, 2020-05-27 at 01:20 +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote: > > Hello. > > > > There is a docker/podman container image part of the Fedora Python > Classroom Lab: > > > >https://labs.fedoraproject.org/en/python-classroom > > > > I need help

Re: Help needed with Fedora Python Classroom Lab container image

2020-05-27 Thread Clement Verna
On Wed, 27 May 2020 at 02:28, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Wed, 2020-05-27 at 01:20 +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote: > > Hello. > > > > There is a docker/podman container image part of the Fedora Python > Classroom Lab: > > > >https://labs.fedoraproject.org/en/python-classroom > > > > I need help

Re: wrong info on apps.fedoraproject.org

2020-05-22 Thread Clement Verna
On Fri, 22 May 2020 at 08:38, Jos de Kloe wrote: > Something seems wrong in: https://apps.fedoraproject.org/packages/pyproj > The header text and upstream point to pyproject-rpm-macros in stead of > pyproj. > Does anybody know how to fix this? > That application has been in a bad shape for a

Re: CPE Weekly: 2020-05-11

2020-05-12 Thread Clement Verna
On Mon, 11 May 2020 at 12:55, Clement Verna wrote: > > > On Mon, 11 May 2020 at 11:03, Fabio Valentini > wrote: > >> On Mon, May 11, 2020 at 10:42 AM Aoife Moloney >> wrote: >> > ## GitForge Updates >> > * We are tracking our progress

Re: CPE Weekly: 2020-05-11

2020-05-11 Thread Clement Verna
On Mon, 11 May 2020 at 11:03, Fabio Valentini wrote: > On Mon, May 11, 2020 at 10:42 AM Aoife Moloney > wrote: > > ## GitForge Updates > > * We are tracking our progress here (nothing new added yet, fyi) > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Git_forge_update > > * And the council are tracking the

Re: CPE WEeekly: 2020-05-02

2020-05-04 Thread Clement Verna
On Sun, 3 May 2020 at 21:42, clime wrote: > On Sun, 3 May 2020 at 19:42, Aoife Moloney wrote: > > > > # CPE Weekly: 2020-05-02 > > --- > > title: CPE Weekly status email > > tags: CPE Weekly, email > > --- > > > > > > > > > > Background: > > The Community Platform Engineering group is the Red

Re: bodhi: stuck updates

2020-04-28 Thread Clement Verna
On Tue, 28 Apr 2020 at 18:41, Alexander Ploumistos < alex.ploumis...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > > Almost a week ago, I built cmpfit and fityk in side tags on F31, F32 > and F33. While the builds for F33 moved directly to stable - as > expected - the other two got stuck for 4 days. I noticed that I

Re: Rawhide update from side tag pending for 2 days

2020-04-08 Thread Clement Verna
On Wed, 8 Apr 2020 at 13:42, Fabio Valentini wrote: > On Wed, Apr 8, 2020 at 11:58 AM Clement Verna > wrote: > > > > > > > > On Wed, 8 Apr 2020 at 11:38, Fabio Valentini > wrote: > >> > >> On Wed, Apr 8, 2020, 11:27 Richard W.M. Jones >

Re: Rawhide update from side tag pending for 2 days

2020-04-08 Thread Clement Verna
On Wed, 8 Apr 2020 at 13:15, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > On Wed, Apr 08, 2020 at 11:57:27AM +0200, Clement Verna wrote: > > >> > > https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-d120de33c5 > > You need to edit the update and remove these builds. You can cli

Re: Rawhide update from side tag pending for 2 days

2020-04-08 Thread Clement Verna
On Wed, 8 Apr 2020 at 11:29, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > On Wed, Apr 08, 2020 at 08:53:38AM +0200, Igor Gnatenko wrote: > > I agree, if this would not happen then everything would just blow up. > > Wouldn't the lower NVR builds simply be ignored? > The merging a side tag is not considering NVRs

Re: Rawhide update from side tag pending for 2 days

2020-04-08 Thread Clement Verna
On Wed, 8 Apr 2020 at 11:38, Fabio Valentini wrote: > On Wed, Apr 8, 2020, 11:27 Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > >> On Tue, Apr 07, 2020 at 05:36:44PM -0400, Mohan Boddu wrote: >> > On Tue, Apr 7, 2020 at 2:56 AM Richard W.M. Jones >> wrote: >> > > >> > > >> > >

Re: Rawhide update from side tag pending for 2 days

2020-04-08 Thread Clement Verna
On Tue, 7 Apr 2020 at 23:38, Mohan Boddu wrote: > I guess it should be a fixed in bodhi. But for now you can remove the > builds that it's complaining about in the update. > > https://github.com/fedora-infra/bodhi/issues/3991 Answered in the ticket, but I think Bodhi is behaving correctly

Re: Rawhide update from side tag pending for 2 days

2020-04-08 Thread Clement Verna
On Tue, 7 Apr 2020 at 14:57, Rex Dieter wrote: > Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > > > > https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-d120de33c5 > > > > This one is a Rawhide update from a side tag, submitted on Sunday > > morning which has been in pending for 2 days. (As it's Rawhide it's >

Re: CPE Git Forge Decision

2020-04-03 Thread Clement Verna
On Thu, 2 Apr 2020 at 22:33, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Thu, 2020-04-02 at 21:58 +0200, Clement Verna wrote: > > [evolution is still crashing. sigh. such is life. apologies for > formatting, again] > > > > So yeah, let's discount the releng folks first, because rele

Re: CPE Git Forge Decision

2020-04-02 Thread Clement Verna
On Thu, 2 Apr 2020 at 20:49, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Thu, 2020-04-02 at 11:52 +0100, Leigh Griffin wrote: > > [up front: apologies for any weird formatting in this email, Evolution > is crashing on me like crazy while I try to edit it, so I'm sending it > from Roundcube which I don't

Re: CPE Git Forge Decision

2020-04-01 Thread Clement Verna
On Wed, 1 Apr 2020 at 14:40, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > > > On Wed, 1 Apr 2020 at 08:16, Pierre-Yves Chibon > wrote: > >> On Wed, Apr 01, 2020 at 11:49:41AM +0200, Clement Verna wrote: >> >There is also an historical taste to write in house applications

Re: CPE Git Forge Decision

2020-04-01 Thread Clement Verna
On Wed, 1 Apr 2020 at 14:16, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: > On Wed, Apr 01, 2020 at 11:49:41AM +0200, Clement Verna wrote: > >There is also an historical taste to write in house applications for > >things that don't really seems critical to the Fedora Project, for > ex

Re: CPE Git Forge Decision

2020-04-01 Thread Clement Verna
On Wed, 1 Apr 2020 at 09:47, Panu Matilainen wrote: > On 3/31/20 8:44 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: > > > I understand there are practical resource considerations and so on > > here, but I still think this merits more high level and serious > > consideration. At the very least, if we have somehow

Re: CPE Git Forge Decision

2020-04-01 Thread Clement Verna
On Wed, 1 Apr 2020 at 09:34, Julen Landa Alustiza wrote: > > > 20/4/1 08:42(e)an, Clement Verna igorleak idatzi zuen: > > > > > > On Tue, 31 Mar 2020 at 22:41, Robbie Harwood > <mailto:rharw...@redhat.com>> wrote: > > > > Clement Ver

Re: CPE Git Forge Decision

2020-04-01 Thread Clement Verna
On Tue, 31 Mar 2020 at 22:41, Robbie Harwood wrote: > Clement Verna writes: > > > Neal Gompa wrote: > >> Clement Verna wrote: > >> > >> As for Pagure itself, I think this is where we fundamentally > >> disagree. I think it behooves us to own

Re: CPE Git Forge Decision

2020-03-31 Thread Clement Verna
On Tue, 31 Mar 2020 at 20:04, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Tue, 2020-03-31 at 13:55 -0400, Matthew Miller wrote: > > On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 10:44:35AM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > > > I'm sorry, but I have to agree with Kevin and Michael here to a > > > significant extent. Running our own

Re: CPE Git Forge Decision

2020-03-31 Thread Clement Verna
On Tue, 31 Mar 2020 at 14:57, Neal Gompa wrote: > On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 7:10 AM Clement Verna > wrote: > > > > I just want to give a bit of insight from someone who is working day to > day on Fedora's infrastructure, since I believe that might help give a bit > more

Re: CPE Git Forge Decision

2020-03-31 Thread Clement Verna
On Tue, 31 Mar 2020 at 13:46, Miro Hrončok wrote: > On 31. 03. 20 13:09, Clement Verna wrote: > > On Tue, 31 Mar 2020 at 11:41, Miro Hrončok > <mailto:mhron...@redhat.com>> wrote: > > > > On 31. 03. 20 10:36, Leigh Griffin wrote: > > > I res

Re: CPE Git Forge Decision

2020-03-31 Thread Clement Verna
On Tue, 31 Mar 2020 at 11:41, Miro Hrončok wrote: > On 31. 03. 20 10:36, Leigh Griffin wrote: > > I respect that there is disagreement but Gitlab is the choice we are > making. > > I always try to assume good intentions, but this is very hard now. I > understand > this statement as follows: > >

Re: CPE Git Forge Decision

2020-03-31 Thread Clement Verna
On Mon, 30 Mar 2020 at 22:55, Till Maas wrote: > Hi, > > On Mon, Mar 30, 2020 at 02:40:13PM +, Leigh Griffin wrote: > > On Mon, Mar 30, 2020 at 3:26 PM Till Maas wrote: > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > On Mon, Mar 30, 2020 at 01:59:07PM +, Leigh Griffin wrote: > > > > On Mon, Mar 30, 2020 at

Re: Bodhi 5.2.0 deployed in production.

2020-03-23 Thread Clement Verna
On Mon, 23 Mar 2020 at 15:33, Clement Verna wrote: > > > On Mon, 23 Mar 2020 at 10:39, Igor Gnatenko < > ignatenkobr...@fedoraproject.org> wrote: > >> Hello Clement, >> >> On Mon, Mar 23, 2020 at 10:30 AM Clement Verna >> wrote: >> > &

Re: Bodhi 5.2.0 deployed in production.

2020-03-23 Thread Clement Verna
On Mon, 23 Mar 2020 at 20:34, Fabio Valentini wrote: > On Mon, Mar 23, 2020 at 8:12 PM Fabio Valentini > wrote: > > > > On Mon, Mar 23, 2020 at 3:34 PM Clement Verna > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > On Mon, 23 Mar 2020 at 10:39,

Re: Bodhi 5.2.0 deployed in production.

2020-03-23 Thread Clement Verna
On Mon, 23 Mar 2020 at 10:39, Igor Gnatenko < ignatenkobr...@fedoraproject.org> wrote: > Hello Clement, > > On Mon, Mar 23, 2020 at 10:30 AM Clement Verna > wrote: > > > > Hi all, > > > > I have just deployed Bodhi 5.2.0 in production. This version s

Bodhi 5.2.0 deployed in production.

2020-03-23 Thread Clement Verna
Hi all, I have just deployed Bodhi 5.2.0 in production. This version should improve the performance of updates creation since the expansive task of tagging builds in koji has been moved to an async process using a celery workers. Also this version will also allow the use of side-tags to all

Re: 'greenwave failed' – what does this mean?

2020-03-11 Thread Clement Verna
On Wed, 11 Mar 2020 at 07:58, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > Hi, > > I have two updates [1, 2] for which I got email notifications yesterday: > > This update's test gating status has been changed to 'greenwave_failed'. > It means that Greenwave failed to answer to the request sent by

Re: Build into < Rawhide side tag fails with "Package ... has already been built"

2020-02-28 Thread Clement Verna
On Fri, 28 Feb 2020 at 16:17, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > On Fri, Feb 28, 2020 at 08:50:08AM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > On Thu, Feb 27, 2020 at 11:43:16AM -0800, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > > On Thu, Feb 27, 2020 at 07:50:05PM +0100, Clement Verna wrote: > > > >

Re: Build into < Rawhide side tag fails with "Package ... has already been built"

2020-02-27 Thread Clement Verna
On Thu, 27 Feb 2020 at 14:14, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > Despite earlier concerns, this does in fact appear to all be working fine. > Yes requesting and building in the side tag should work just fine. > > There are now F32 builds going through for all OCaml packages in a > side tag, and when

Re: State of FMN (FedMSG Notifications) and Replacement

2020-02-26 Thread Clement Verna
On Wed, 26 Feb 2020 at 09:43, Fabio Valentini wrote: > On Wed, Feb 26, 2020 at 8:27 AM Clement Verna > wrote: > > > > Hi all, > > > > FMN (https://apps.fedoraproject.org/notifications) is currently one of > the main blocking point for dropping fedmsg in fa

Re: State of FMN (FedMSG Notifications) and Replacement

2020-02-26 Thread Clement Verna
On Wed, 26 Feb 2020 at 09:17, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Wed, 2020-02-26 at 08:26 +0100, Clement Verna wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > FMN (https://apps.fedoraproject.org/notifications) is currently one of > the > > main blocking point for dropping fedmsg in favou

State of FMN (FedMSG Notifications) and Replacement

2020-02-25 Thread Clement Verna
Hi all, FMN (https://apps.fedoraproject.org/notifications) is currently one of the main blocking point for dropping fedmsg in favour of fedora-messaging. FMN is quite important to the community and the composition of Fedora because it gives emails and notifications on commits, composes, builds

Re: Fedora & Containers

2020-02-25 Thread Clement Verna
On Tue, 25 Feb 2020 at 17:07, Michal Schorm wrote: > Hello, > > Will anybody be able to explain to me the current state of the > containers & containerization in Fedora, please? > Hi Michal, As you mention in the points below the current state of building containers in Fedora needs a lot of

A small improvement on the compose-tracker tool

2020-02-11 Thread Clement Verna
Hi all, I have made a small change to the compose-tracker [0] tool, which is a fedora-messaging consumer creating tickets in this repo [1] for every composes that does not complete successfully. In each ticket you now have access to the time it took for the compose to run, in addition with the

Re: Packages webapp status

2020-02-08 Thread Clement Verna
On Fri, 7 Feb 2020 at 21:50, Richard Fearn wrote: > On Mon, 3 Feb 2020 at 17:03, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > > > Thats... much more harsh than I would agree with. I still use it and > > find some of its information helpfull. > > Sadly it does seem to have got a lot worse recently... I noticed last >

Re: Fedora review tickets tracker pages

2020-02-04 Thread Clement Verna
On Tue, 4 Feb 2020 at 20:55, Mattia Verga via devel < devel@lists.fedoraproject.org> wrote: > Il 04/02/20 10:29, Miroslav Suchý ha scritto: > > > > People are asking for this for years. No one ever had time to do this. > This make you most competent guy :) Just do it. > > > Well, I only have

Re: Git Forge Requirements: Please see the Community Blog

2020-01-29 Thread Clement Verna
On Wed, 29 Jan 2020 at 18:26, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > On Wed, 29 Jan 2020 at 11:38, Clement Verna > wrote: > > > > > > > > On Wed, 29 Jan 2020 at 16:18, Pierre-Yves Chibon > wrote: > >> > > >> these heroics related to pagure? >

Re: Git Forge Requirements: Please see the Community Blog

2020-01-29 Thread Clement Verna
On Wed, 29 Jan 2020 at 16:56, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Wed, 2020-01-29 at 15:56 +0100, Clement Verna wrote: > > On Wed, Jan 29, 2020, 15:23 Julen Landa Alustiza < > jla...@fedoraproject.org> > > wrote: > > > > > (snip) > > > > > &g

Re: Git Forge Requirements: Please see the Community Blog

2020-01-29 Thread Clement Verna
On Wed, 29 Jan 2020 at 16:18, Julen Landa Alustiza wrote: > > > 2020(e)ko urtarrilaren 29(a) 15:56:08 (CET)-(e)an, Clement Verna < > cve...@fedoraproject.org>-(e)k hau idatzi zuen: > >On Wed, Jan 29, 2020, 15:23 Julen Landa Alustiza > > > >wrote: >

Re: Git Forge Requirements: Please see the Community Blog

2020-01-29 Thread Clement Verna
On Wed, 29 Jan 2020 at 16:18, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: > On Wed, Jan 29, 2020 at 03:56:08PM +0100, Clement Verna wrote: > >On Wed, Jan 29, 2020, 15:23 Julen Landa Alustiza > > wrote: > > > > (snip) > > > > 20/1/29 14:49(e

Re: Git Forge Requirements: Please see the Community Blog

2020-01-29 Thread Clement Verna
On Wed, Jan 29, 2020, 15:23 Julen Landa Alustiza wrote: > (snip) > > 20/1/29 14:49(e)an, Clement Verna igorleak idatzi zuen: > > To me that's the all point of this > > process, let's put down what we *really* *really* need and then look at > > the different opt

Re: Git Forge Requirements: Please see the Community Blog

2020-01-29 Thread Clement Verna
On Wed, 29 Jan 2020 at 11:36, Iñaki Ucar wrote: > On Wed, 29 Jan 2020 at 00:08, Leigh Griffin wrote: > > > > On Tue, Jan 28, 2020, 22:06 Iñaki Ucar wrote: > >> > >> On Tue, 28 Jan 2020 at 20:58, Leigh Griffin > wrote: > >> > > >> > This thread is serving as a source of requirements (although

Re: Git Forge Requirements: Please see the Community Blog

2020-01-22 Thread Clement Verna
On Wed, 22 Jan 2020 at 15:37, Ernestas Kulik wrote: > On Wed, 2020-01-22 at 09:12 -0500, Neal Gompa wrote: > > On Wed, Jan 22, 2020 at 9:08 AM Ernestas Kulik > > wrote: > > > On Wed, 2020-01-22 at 05:00 -0500, Neal Gompa wrote: > > > > > > And then there's the issue that we are not upstream and

Re: Git Forge Requirements: Please see the Community Blog

2020-01-22 Thread Clement Verna
On Wed, 22 Jan 2020 at 12:38, Miro Hrončok wrote: > On 22. 01. 20 12:19, Neal Gompa wrote:>> We do need a better > discoverability and > visibility in the generic > >> development community. But it is a solvable task: we can create a > >> read-only mirror of our code on every common platform out

Re: Git Forge Requirements: Please see the Community Blog

2020-01-22 Thread Clement Verna
On Wed, 22 Jan 2020 at 11:02, Neal Gompa wrote: > On Wed, Jan 22, 2020 at 1:05 AM Peter Robinson > wrote: > > > > On Wed, Jan 22, 2020 at 4:59 AM Dan Čermák > > wrote: > > > > > > Felix Schwarz writes: > > > > > > > Am 21.01.20 um 21:48 schrieb Guido Aulisi: > > > >> I totally agree with

Re: Git Forge Requirements: Please see the Community Blog

2020-01-22 Thread Clement Verna
On Tue, 21 Jan 2020 at 22:32, Michael Catanzaro wrote: > On Tue, Jan 21, 2020 at 4:04 pm, Neal Gompa wrote: > > And any discussion of GitHub isn't going to involve self-hosted, it's > > going to involve GitHub.com, which means we're talking about losing > > more of our independence as a

Re: Let's talk about Fedora in the '20s!

2020-01-07 Thread Clement Verna
On Tue, Jan 7, 2020, 18:21 Nicolas Mailhot via devel < devel@lists.fedoraproject.org> wrote: > Le mardi 07 janvier 2020 à 17:14 +0100, Iñaki Ucar a écrit : > > > > I'm far from having a satisfactory response to that, but I see two > > fronts here. First, marketing. How does Ubuntu managed to be

Re: koji / bodhi issues status update

2020-01-06 Thread Clement Verna
On Fri, 3 Jan 2020 at 22:41, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > As some of you may know, we have been having issues with koji and bodhi > over the holidays. :( koji would sometimes not tag builds or error them > with odd error messages and bodhi wasn't pushing updates. > > I'm happy to report that the

Re: koji / bodhi issues status update

2020-01-05 Thread Clement Verna
On Fri, 3 Jan 2020 at 22:41, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > As some of you may know, we have been having issues with koji and bodhi > over the holidays. :( koji would sometimes not tag builds or error them > with odd error messages and bodhi wasn't pushing updates. > > I'm happy to report that the

Re: FEDORA-2019-b55ed79892 ejected from the push

2019-12-24 Thread Clement Verna
On Tue, Dec 24, 2019, 09:23 Andrea Musuruane wrote: > Hi guys, > can someone please tell me what's going on? > > https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-b55ed79892 > > Thanks! > Hi the infra is experiencing some issue [0] which I think is the root cause of this problem. Long

Re: Regarding Adam Miller (maxamillion) packager status

2019-12-10 Thread Clement Verna
On Tue, Dec 10, 2019, 21:49 Miro Hrončok wrote: > On 09. 12. 19 18:38, Adam Miller wrote: > > On Mon, Dec 9, 2019 at 11:15 AM Miro Hrončok > wrote: > >> > >> On 09. 12. 19 18:04, Richard Shaw wrote: > >>> I had a short email conversation with Adam and he doesn't have time to > maintain > >>>

Re: Bohdi / Create New Update - I miss the field Builds

2019-12-05 Thread Clement Verna
On Thu, 5 Dec 2019 at 17:45, Martin Gansser wrote: > I mean this field [1] > > [1] https://martinkg.fedorapeople.org/ErrorReports/bohdi/bohdi.png Hi Martin, A new version of Bodhi was deployed yesterday. Can you clean your browser cache and reload the page ? And let us know if that helps :-)

Re: Bodhi Outage Ongoing - Deploying 5.0

2019-11-12 Thread Clement Verna
On Tue, 12 Nov 2019 at 11:08, Miro Hrončok wrote: > On 12. 11. 19 10:45, Clement Verna wrote: > > We will be upgrading bodhi to its 5.0 release. This release comes in > with few UI > > changes but also task scheduling system (rabbitmq/celery based) allowing > to > >

Bodhi Outage Ongoing - Deploying 5.0

2019-11-12 Thread Clement Verna
Dear all, There is an outage on going, which may last up to 2 hours. Rawhide update will suffer a longer outage which will probably last until later today (15:00 UTC). I will send an update to the list once everything is back to normal. Apologies for not sending this notice earlier. To convert

Re: Upgrading ODCS prod (hopefully) next week.

2019-11-04 Thread Clement Verna
uild flatpak images and > therefore I presume the flatpak builds will fail during this upgrade. > > I will coordinate the upgrade with Clement Verna (OSBS), Owen Taylor > (flatpak) and Mikolaj Izdebski (fedora infra). In case you think you should > be included in discussions related to th

Re: Defining the future of the packager workflow in Fedora

2019-10-03 Thread Clement Verna
On Thu, Oct 3, 2019, 17:43 Jeremy Cline wrote: > On Wed, Oct 02, 2019 at 08:26:16PM +0200, Clement Verna wrote: > > On Wed, 2 Oct 2019 at 19:34, Matthew Miller > > wrote: > > > > > On Wed, Oct 02, 2019 at 05:31:56PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > >

Re: Defining the future of the packager workflow in Fedora

2019-10-02 Thread Clement Verna
On Wed, 2 Oct 2019 at 19:34, Matthew Miller wrote: > On Wed, Oct 02, 2019 at 05:31:56PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > > ○ Every changes to dist-git is done via pull-requests > > Erm, no thank you. Pull requests are a terrible workflow. > > It's definitely the winning workflow in the open

  1   2   >