Re: Tomcat Package Changes in Rawhide

On Fri, Jun 4, 2021 at 11:21 AM Fabio Valentini wrote: > > That is the worst news I've gotten in a while :/ How many maven > artifacts are being used? Could I get away with only providing > poms/artifacts for the servlet/jsp/el implementations or do they need all > 30+ artifacts? > > It wouldn't

Re: Tomcat Package Changes in Rawhide

On Fri, Jun 4, 2021 at 10:56 AM Fabio Valentini wrote: > On Fri, Jun 4, 2021 at 1:47 PM Coty Sutherland > wrote: > > > > Hi all, > > > > Sorry to be a bit late to the party, but in response to some indirect > dependencies being orphaned I've taken the opp

Re: Tomcat Package Changes in Rawhide

On Fri, Jun 4, 2021 at 8:58 AM Peter Boy wrote: > Please, could you re-include the logrotate config file. It is useful > independently from the jsvc package and does not harm. > Sure, no problem. Thanks for the reply :) > Thanks > Peter > > > > > Am 04.06.2021 um

Tomcat Package Changes in Rawhide

Hi all, Sorry to be a bit late to the party, but in response to some indirect dependencies being orphaned I've taken the opportunity to clean up the Tomcat package a little. I have removed the following "features" from tomcat: 1) I dropped the "examples" webapp from Tomcat, which is recommended

Re: The Javapocalypse is Monday

On Thu, Jun 3, 2021 at 5:56 PM Sérgio Basto wrote: > On Thu, 2021-06-03 at 15:30 -0600, Jerry James wrote: > > I've just been looking through my packager-dashboard page. A > > depressingly large chunk of my packages are going to become > > unbuildable on Monday when a bunch of orphaned Java

Re: Question about package module development

; > -- > Jun > ___ > devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org > Fedora Code of Conduct: > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct

Question about package module development

Hi all, I'm working on (learning modularity) and developing a module for my package and created a not-so-great (super long) branch name in the dist-git rpm and module repo before I realized that it would be the stream's name too. Also, it seems that the incomplete module was picked up and

Fwd: Tomcat Package Major Version Update

Hi all, This is a day late, but the tomcat package provided by rawhide has been updated to Tomcat 9.0! This may break some package dependencies because the servlet API package changed (new version). Sorry that I didn't provide a heads up. I have been working with the FreeIPA folks because they

Re: Self Introduction: Mike Miller

Welcome to the Fedora Project! On Fri, Oct 28, 2016 at 10:15 AM, Mike Miller wrote: > Hello, > > My name is Mike Miller and I have been a software developer for almost ten > years. I am fairly new as a committer to the Open Source Community but I > have developed software

Re: Bugzilla issues

Done, thanks! On Thu, Aug 18, 2016 at 12:13 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek <zbys...@in.waw.pl> wrote: > On 08/18/2016 11:41 AM, Coty Sutherland wrote: >> Hello all, >> >> I'm trying to get some help with a couple of BZs that look odd to me. >> >> It look

Bugzilla issues

Hello all, I'm trying to get some help with a couple of BZs that look odd to me. It looks like these two bugs are somehow stuck in an ON_QA state by an obsolete bodhi update. There was an update which resolved them that was pushed to stable a while ago. The two bugs are:

Self Introduction: Coty Sutherland

. Thanks!! [0] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Orphaned_package_that_need_new_maintainers#Claiming_Ownership_of_a_Retired_Package -- Coty Sutherland, RHCSA, RHCE, JBCAA Senior Software Engineer @ Red Hat, Inc. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org