Re: koschei interpertation; was: Re: -z defs linker flag activated in Fedora rawhide

2018-01-24 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
On Tue, Jan 23, 2018 at 02:06:15PM -0500, R P Herrold wrote: > On Tue, 23 Jan 2018, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: > > > What needs to be done for this ? I see my package "libvirt" present > > in its UI > > > > https://apps.fedoraproject.org/kosc

Re: -z defs linker flag activated in Fedora rawhide

2018-01-23 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
On Tue, Jan 23, 2018 at 05:56:47PM +, Jonathan Wakely wrote: > On 23/01/18 15:38 +0100, Florian Weimer wrote: > > We could deactivate -z defs for F28 and reactivate it after the branch > > for F29, giving packagers more time to fix issues. > > I think that might be a good idea (given how late

Re: -z defs linker flag activated in Fedora rawhide

2018-01-23 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
On Tue, Jan 23, 2018 at 02:04:26PM +0100, Florian Weimer wrote: > On 01/23/2018 01:49 PM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: > > On Mon, Jan 22, 2018 at 04:24:31PM +0100, Florian Weimer wrote: > > > I updated redhat-rpm-config to instruct ld to reject linking shared > > > o

Re: -z defs linker flag activated in Fedora rawhide

2018-01-23 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
On Mon, Jan 22, 2018 at 04:24:31PM +0100, Florian Weimer wrote: > I updated redhat-rpm-config to instruct ld to reject linking shared objects > with undefined symbols. Such undefined symbols break symbol versioning > because the are not necessarily bound to the correct symbol version at run >

Re: [HEADS UP] Manging shebangs in Rawhide

2018-01-23 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
On Tue, Jan 23, 2018 at 08:55:03AM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > On Mon, Jan 22, 2018 at 05:36:56PM +0100, Igor Gnatenko wrote: > > * Removes exectuable bit (and shows warning) for files where there are no > > shebang > > The way this is written implies that ordinary (eg ELF) executables >

Re: Firefox "Looking Glass" fiasco

2017-12-19 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
On Mon, Dec 18, 2017 at 01:19:26PM -0500, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > On 18 December 2017 at 13:08, Matthew Miller wrote: > > On Mon, Dec 18, 2017 at 09:55:26AM -0800, Adam Williamson wrote: > >> I think we should be concerned by this kind of behaviour on the part of >

Re: Firefox "Looking Glass" fiasco

2017-12-18 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
On Mon, Dec 18, 2017 at 10:42:17AM -0800, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Mon, 2017-12-18 at 12:34 -0600, Chris Adams wrote: > > Once upon a time, Adam Williamson said: > > > As part of a tie-in with an American TV show, Mozilla thought it'd be a > > > great idea to

Re: Firefox "Looking Glass" fiasco

2017-12-18 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
On Mon, Dec 18, 2017 at 12:34:46PM -0600, Chris Adams wrote: > Once upon a time, Adam Williamson said: > > As part of a tie-in with an American TV show, Mozilla thought it'd be a > > great idea to silently install a cryptically-named addon in all(?) > > Firefox

Re: RFC: -Wl,--as-needed by default (and glibc ldconfig file trigger)

2017-11-21 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
On Tue, Nov 21, 2017 at 05:22:32PM +0100, Stephan Bergmann wrote: > On 11/21/2017 04:12 PM, David Tardon wrote: > > On Tue, Nov 21, 2017 at 01:54:13PM +, Tomasz Kłoczko wrote: > > > On 21 November 2017 at 10:43, Igor Gnatenko > > > wrote: > > > > -BEGIN

Re: RFC: -Wl,--as-needed by default

2017-11-13 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
On Mon, Nov 13, 2017 at 11:52:14AM +0100, Björn 'besser82' Esser wrote: > Am Montag, den 13.11.2017, 11:02 +0100 schrieb Igor Gnatenko: > > Hello, > > > > I'm interested why we still don't have this flag in our CFLAGS? It > > seems that > > other distributions like openSUSE enable it by default

Re: CUPS will change license since 2.3 version - now incompatible with GPLv2

2017-11-08 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
On Wed, Nov 08, 2017 at 04:17:20PM +0100, Hans de Goede wrote: > Hi, > > On 08-11-17 16:06, Solomon Peachy wrote: > > On Wed, Nov 08, 2017 at 03:53:32PM +0100, Hans de Goede wrote: > > > >I don't think static linking against libcups is common enough to be a > > > >serious concern - CUPS

Re: CUPS will change license since 2.3 version - now incompatible with GPLv2

2017-11-08 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
On Wed, Nov 08, 2017 at 08:32:50AM -0500, Solomon Peachy wrote: > On Wed, Nov 08, 2017 at 07:45:28AM -0500, Neal Gompa wrote: > > It will. Previously, it was licensed under GPLv2 + LGPLv2 with Apple > > exceptions. Now it is ASL 2.0 across the board. GPLv2 projects can not > > link to the newer

Verifying sources against gpg signature during RPM build ?

2017-09-04 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
A number of packages that I maintain have GPG signatures provided alongside the sources for new releases. Is there any best pratice approach / RPM macro magic for verifying the GPG signature of sources during build, or are packagers just (re)inventing the wheel each time ? Regards, Daniel --

Re: are the armv7hl builders healthy?

2017-09-01 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
On Fri, Sep 01, 2017 at 08:17:11AM -0400, Kaleb Keithley wrote: > > I'm trying to build ceph-12.2.0 for f28, So far the build has failed twice > on armv7hl during %install trying to install a file that was seeminlyly > successfully built. > > That's two different files. The first time it was

Re: Mass package change (python2- binary package renaming)

2017-08-10 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
On Wed, Aug 09, 2017 at 10:17:34PM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > On Wed, Aug 09, 2017 at 04:08:35PM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > > On Wed, Aug 09, 2017 at 04:48:42PM +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: > > > On Tue, Aug 08, 2017 at 10:14:26PM +, Zbi

Re: Mass package change (python2- binary package renaming)

2017-08-09 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
On Tue, Aug 08, 2017 at 10:14:26PM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > Hello Fedora Python package maintainers! > > This is an announcement of a mass package renaming: > Python 2 binary packages will be renamed to python2-*. > > This will happen soon after the F27 branching on August

ceph build stuck in f27-pending for 12+ hours

2017-08-03 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
This ceph build finished building in koji 12+ hours ago: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=942742 but it still in f27-pending. Is there something stuck that prevents it going into f27, and thus inherited into f27-build ? Regards, Daniel -- |: https://berrange.com

Re: Recompiling/relinking dependent applications/libraries on DSO change

2017-07-28 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
On Fri, Jul 28, 2017 at 01:39:50PM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote: > binutils 2.29 introduced an optimization which requires that in the > general case, applications and libraries linking against a DSO will have > to be rebuilt when the DSO change the implementation of functions (i.e., > changes to a

Re: armv7hl builds running out of memory

2017-07-26 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
On Wed, Jul 26, 2017 at 12:57:32PM +0100, Peter Robinson wrote: > On Wed, Jul 26, 2017 at 12:53 PM, Kaleb S. KEITHLEY > wrote: > > trying to build ceph-12 on f27 armv7hl. > > > > It builds on everything x86_64, aarch64, s390x, and i686 (w/o java), but > > on armv7hl the

Re: F27 System Wide Change: Graphical Applications as Flatpaks

2017-07-17 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
On Mon, Jul 17, 2017 at 12:45:27PM +0200, Michael Stahl wrote: > On 16.07.2017 14:10, Kevin Kofler wrote: > > Debarshi Ray wrote: > >> How about reliable online updates of running applications as a > >> benefit? > > > > Upgrading RPM applications online just works. I do it all the time. The KDE

Re: F27 System Wide Change: Graphical Applications as Flatpaks

2017-07-17 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
On Sat, Jul 15, 2017 at 05:17:44PM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > On Fri, Jul 14, 2017 at 03:42:15PM +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: > > On Mon, Jul 10, 2017 at 03:31:30PM -0400, Owen Taylor wrote: > > > On Mon, 2017-07-10 at 00:46 +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote: >

Re: F27 System Wide Change: Graphical Applications as Flatpaks

2017-07-17 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
On Sun, Jul 16, 2017 at 01:29:01PM +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote: > Daniel P. Berrange wrote: > > If I look at this from my POV as the upstream maintainer of a graphical > > application wishing to make it widely available to users of many distros. > > The question is whether it

Re: F27 System Wide Change: Graphical Applications as Flatpaks

2017-07-14 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
On Mon, Jul 10, 2017 at 03:31:30PM -0400, Owen Taylor wrote: > On Mon, 2017-07-10 at 00:46 +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote: > > Jaroslav Reznik wrote: > > > = System Wide Change: Graphical Applications as Flatpaks = > > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Graphical_Applications_as_Fl > > > atpaks >

Mingw RPM deps broken [Re: Fedora rawhide compose report: 20170708.n.0 changes]

2017-07-10 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
On Sat, Jul 08, 2017 at 02:40:42PM +, Fedora Rawhide Report wrote: > Broken deps for x86_64 > -- > [mingw-atkmm] > mingw32-atkmm-2.24.2-3.fc26.noarch requires mingw32(libglibmm-2.4-1.dll) > mingw64-atkmm-2.24.2-3.fc26.noarch

Re: floppy-support being retired (was: Retiring Packages with Broken Dependencies in branched (2017-06-26))

2017-06-28 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
On Wed, Jun 28, 2017 at 11:03:09AM +0200, Björn Persson wrote: > t...@fedoraproject.org wrote: > > floppy-support bruno 162 weeks ago > > So are floppies now definitely a thing of the past according to Fedora? This message is simply Fedora is saying that

Re: /usr/bin/qemu-kvm symlink

2017-06-19 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
On Sat, Jun 17, 2017 at 05:25:18PM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > Hi, > > I was told [1] that /usr/bin/qemu-kvm is obsolete, and that the right > thing is to use 'qemu-system-x86_64 -enable-kvm', and that Arch and > Gentoo and qemu upstream don't support /usr/bin/qemu-kvm. Fedora

Re: Rawhide: where for art thou? (why no rawhide composes recently)

2017-06-14 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
On Tue, Jun 13, 2017 at 07:11:21AM -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > Greetings. > > Some folks may have noticed that there have been no completed rawhide > composes in a while (13 days as of today). > > This has been due to a variety of bugs and issues, along with pungi now > failing composes that

Re: mp3 encoding now ok

2017-05-18 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
On Thu, May 04, 2017 at 09:07:25AM -0400, Christian Schaller wrote: > Hi, not sure why Spot hasn't chimed in, but yes this > has been run through legal. Tom and I where on the same > email thread with the laywers. For clarity someone with authority presumably ought to remove "MP3 Support" from

Re: Deprecated net-tools? Mass bug filing?

2017-05-17 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
On Tue, May 16, 2017 at 11:29:42PM +0100, James Hogarth wrote: > Hi, > > It was pointed out on IRC to me tonight that there are actually a > reasonable number of packages that still depend on net-tools[0]. > > This has been deprecated for a long time now and we really should > strive to have

Re: What is your opinion on "sudo pip" fix for Fedora 27?

2017-04-27 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
On Thu, Apr 27, 2017 at 11:48:06PM +1000, Nick Coghlan wrote: > On 27 April 2017 at 23:04, Daniel P. Berrange <berra...@redhat.com> wrote: > > On Thu, Apr 27, 2017 at 04:32:09PM +1000, Nick Coghlan wrote: > >> Their approach means that any harm caused by "sudo pip ins

Re: What is your opinion on "sudo pip" fix for Fedora 27?

2017-04-27 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
On Thu, Apr 27, 2017 at 04:32:09PM +1000, Nick Coghlan wrote: > On 27 April 2017 at 11:47, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote: > > On Wed, Apr 26, 2017 at 7:13 AM, Charalampos Stratakis > >> At the present time, running sudo pip3 in Fedora is not safe. > >> Pip shares its installation

Re: Static libraries in Fedora distribution (Was: Re: [Help Wanted] PPC64LE build for thrift)

2017-03-20 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
On Mon, Mar 20, 2017 at 01:16:56PM +, Tomasz Kłoczko wrote: > On 20 March 2017 at 09:50, Daniel P. Berrange <berra...@redhat.com> wrote: > > > > I've already described this multiple times trying to use different > > > descriptions/analogies about well known *g

Re: Static libraries in Fedora distribution (Was: Re: [Help Wanted] PPC64LE build for thrift)

2017-03-20 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
On Sun, Mar 19, 2017 at 01:38:31AM +, Tomasz Kłoczko wrote: > On 18 March 2017 at 22:26, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > > I read through the whole thread and I still don't understand why > > packaging glibc-static in Fedora is not a good thing. > > > > I've already

Re: Static libraries in Fedora distribution (Was: Re: [Help Wanted] PPC64LE build for thrift)

2017-03-15 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 09:56:50AM -0700, Josh Stone wrote: > On 03/14/2017 05:05 PM, Jonathan Wakely wrote: > > If glibc-static was removed from Fedora and that change propagated to > > RHEL I know of companies that might stop being customers of Red Hat. > > Even if Fedora removed it, we could

Re: Default permissions on /dev/kvm

2017-03-15 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 11:32:35AM -0400, Dusty Mabe wrote: > > > On 03/15/2017 05:17 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: > > > > Sure, if udev maintainers are willing to ship the kvm rule by default, > > that's fine with me for reason you suggest. I simply don't thin

Re: Default permissions on /dev/kvm

2017-03-15 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
M, Daniel J Walsh wrote: > >>>> On 03/14/2017 04:29 PM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: > >>>> I guess if you volume/bind mount the device into the container you could > >>>> see an issue, > >>>> but most containers that deal with /dev/kvm are go

Re: Default permissions on /dev/kvm

2017-03-15 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
On Tue, Mar 14, 2017 at 11:38:51PM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > On Tue, Mar 14, 2017 at 08:29:00PM +0000, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: > > On Tue, Mar 14, 2017 at 08:09:00PM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > > Re: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_

Re: Default permissions on /dev/kvm

2017-03-14 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
On Tue, Mar 14, 2017 at 08:09:00PM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > Re: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1431876 > > Currently if you install a minimal-ish, non-"Virtualization Host" > Fedora, then the permissions on the /dev/kvm device are: > > crw---. 1 root root 10, 232 Mar

Re: Packages dropping anything in /etc/systemd/system

2017-03-14 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
On Tue, Mar 14, 2017 at 06:31:46AM -0400, Simo Sorce wrote: > Hello, > as per subject, what is the stance on dropping anything there from a > rpm ? Either marked as %{config} or not ? > > My naive reading of the Packaging guidelines is that nothing should be > dropped in there by a package, but

Re: policy on changes in or introduction of new dependencies

2017-02-24 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
On Fri, Feb 24, 2017 at 04:24:16PM +0100, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote: > On Friday, 24 February 2017 at 15:31, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: > > On Fri, Feb 24, 2017 at 08:48:43AM -0500, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > > > On 23 February 2017 at 12:24, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierze

Re: policy on changes in or introduction of new dependencies

2017-02-24 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
On Fri, Feb 24, 2017 at 08:48:43AM -0500, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > On 23 February 2017 at 12:24, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski > wrote: > > On Thursday, 23 February 2017 at 14:23, Neal Gompa wrote: > > > I have nothing against delivering latest and greatest software

Re: Is it possible to manually insert shared library deps in an RPM?

2017-02-03 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
On Fri, Feb 03, 2017 at 02:45:08PM +, David Howells wrote: > Hi, > > gcc and cross-gcc currently dynamically load the isl-0.14 shared library - > which means that rpm-build doesn't automagically detect a: > > libisl.so.13()(64bit) > > but, rather, the gcc binary rpm must include a: >

Re: How to build both python 2 and 3 bindings from autotools?

2017-01-26 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
On Thu, Jan 26, 2017 at 09:10:30AM +1000, Peter Hutterer wrote: > Before I start hacking up something nasty I figured it's better to ask: how > do I build both py2 and py3 bindings from a package using autotools (i.e. > AM_PATH_PYTHON)? > > So far my idea revolves around installing both

Re: Is there something wrong with the Koji builders?

2017-01-19 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
On Wed, Jan 18, 2017 at 11:55:38AM -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > On Wed, 18 Jan 2017 07:22:49 -0500 (EST) > Charalampos Stratakis wrote: > > > Python 3 started failing on i686, x86_64 and arm only. > > > > https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=17313924 > > > >

Re: Proposal: Rethink Fedora multilib support

2017-01-05 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
On Thu, Jan 05, 2017 at 11:03:50AM -0500, Stephen Gallagher wrote: > # Overview > > For many years, Fedora has supported multilib by carrying parallel-installable > libraries in /usr/lib[64]. This was necessary for a very long time in order to > support 32-bit applications running on a 64-bit

Re: Proposal: Rethink Fedora multilib support

2017-01-05 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
On Thu, Jan 05, 2017 at 11:56:28AM -0500, Stephen Gallagher wrote: > > It might be different if we could build 32-bit sub-packages in the 64-bit mock > environment, but the tools are *really* not equipped to handle that today (in > particular because Fedora doesn't do cross-compilation; we just

Re: Support for older kernels

2016-12-19 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
On Mon, Dec 19, 2016 at 11:19:06AM +0100, Florian Weimer wrote: > Do we need to support running current Fedora releases in kernels which are > older than the initial Fedora kernel for that release? That is important if we wish to allow a Fedora container of version X to be run on a host with

Re: Packagers - Flag day 2016 Important changes

2016-12-13 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
On Tue, Dec 13, 2016 at 12:19:45PM +0200, Alexander Bokovoy wrote: > On ti, 13 joulu 2016, Alexander Bokovoy wrote: > > On ti, 13 joulu 2016, Vít Ondruch wrote: > > > > > > > > > Dne 12.12.2016 v 16:02 Stephen Gallagher napsal(a): > > > > On 12/12/2016 04:53 AM, Vít Ondruch wrote: > > > > > So

Re: Some preliminary Fedora 25 stats — and future release scheduling

2016-12-07 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
On Tue, Dec 06, 2016 at 03:13:51PM -0500, Matthew Miller wrote: > On Tue, Dec 06, 2016 at 09:11:06AM +0000, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: > > I expect we'd also rebase the virtualization stack in any .1 release, > > or even in the middle of a release if Fedora switched to a yearly &g

Re: Some preliminary Fedora 25 stats — and future release scheduling

2016-12-06 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
On Mon, Dec 05, 2016 at 06:41:27PM -0700, Chris Murphy wrote: > On Mon, Dec 5, 2016 at 5:03 PM, Michael Catanzaro > wrote: > > On Mon, 2016-12-05 at 16:10 -0500, Matthew Miller wrote: > >> It was by design, though — for a while, when a schedule slipped, we > >> planned the

Re: including EOL and vulnerable software in Fedora

2016-10-10 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
On Mon, Oct 10, 2016 at 11:32:43AM +0200, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote: > On Monday, 10 October 2016 at 11:07, Florian Weimer wrote: > > On 10/07/2016 06:43 PM, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote: > > > > > I was made aware that EOL software with known security bugs that will > > > not

Re: DNF skipping packages with conflicts in koji

2016-09-22 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 11:01:56AM +0200, Michael Šimáček wrote: > Hi, > > I recently got a few failed build alerts with suspicious errors about > missing commands/libs in the buildroot, despite the builddep step had > succeeded. The root.log always contains "Skipping packages with conflicts" >

Re: F24, small backward steps

2016-09-13 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
On Tue, Sep 13, 2016 at 10:00:32AM -0500, Michael Catanzaro wrote: > Hi, > > To be clear, the problem is that a small handful of package maintainers > (including Bastien) are collectively "responsible" for all of the GNOME > and freedesktop components in Fedora (including fprintd), and it's >

Re: Proposed mass bug filing for webkitgtk/webkitgtk3 package removal

2016-09-06 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
On Tue, Sep 06, 2016 at 09:01:27AM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > On Fri, Sep 02, 2016 at 07:34:04AM -0500, Michael Catanzaro wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I propose to carry out a mass bug filing with the bug title: "Remove > > webkitgtk/webkitgtk3 dependency" (depending on which package is > >

Re: Maintainer notification of package-related activity (was: Re: Fedora Account System (FAS) security issue)

2016-08-09 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
On Tue, Aug 09, 2016 at 12:27:33PM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote: > On 08/08/2016 09:23 PM, Paul W. Frields wrote: > > For example, activities related > > to package content in dist-git generate notices to maintainers, and > > the discovered flaw would not allow an attacker to circumvent these or >

Re: Packaging FPGA bitstreams

2016-07-29 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
On Fri, Jul 29, 2016 at 02:19:49AM -0400, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote: > On Thu, Jul 28, 2016 at 10:54 PM, Solomon Peachy wrote: > > On Thu, Jul 28, 2016 at 10:19:07PM -0400, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote: > >> Still not reasonable for Fedora, I think. Red Hat, and RHEL, can > >> manage

Re: g++ __VA_ARGS__ error

2016-07-11 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 02:09:24PM +0200, Jan Synacek wrote: > Hello, > > I'm trying to compile the latest version of Warzone2100 on rawhide, > but I'm getting this error: > > g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I.. -DYY_NO_INPUT -D_REENTRANT > -I/usr/include/SDL2 -I/usr/include/libpng16

Re: RFC: static builds for user emulators in Fedora QEMU RPMs

2016-07-07 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
On Thu, Jul 07, 2016 at 09:48:24AM -0400, Jeff Moyer wrote: > "Daniel P. Berrange" <berra...@redhat.com> writes: > > > More typical though is that you have a directory containing an fullish > > install tree of a non-native architecture and you just want t

Re: i686 as secondary arch?

2016-07-05 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
On Tue, Jul 05, 2016 at 12:10:03PM +0100, Peter Robinson wrote: > On Tue, Jul 5, 2016 at 11:56 AM, Florian Weimer wrote: > > On 07/05/2016 10:57 AM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > > >> If you need to run an i686 virtual machine based on Rawhide, my > >> experience is that it's

Re: autoconf test for deprecated readdir_r

2016-06-30 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
On Thu, Jun 30, 2016 at 11:30:38AM -0400, Kaleb KEITHLEY wrote: > > Hi, > > Does anyone have a good/working autoconf test for checking for > deprecated readdir_r (for Fedora 25) ? > > I'm not having much luck. (Have tried AC_COMPILE_IFELSE, among other > things.) > > Alternatively it would be

Re: RFC: static builds for user emulators in Fedora QEMU RPMs

2016-06-30 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
On Thu, Jun 30, 2016 at 10:21:18AM +0200, Michal Schmidt wrote: > On 06/29/2016 12:03 PM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: > > The change to introduce a qemu-binfmt package has small upgrade > > implications since anyone with qemu-user installed today, will loose > > the binar

Re: RFC: static builds for user emulators in Fedora QEMU RPMs

2016-06-29 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
On Wed, Jun 29, 2016 at 04:54:42PM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote: > On 06/29/2016 12:34 PM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: > > On Wed, Jun 29, 2016 at 12:15:02PM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote: > > > On 06/29/2016 12:03 PM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: > > > > Debian handles this

Re: RFC: static builds for user emulators in Fedora QEMU RPMs

2016-06-29 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
On Wed, Jun 29, 2016 at 06:45:36AM -0700, Neal Gompa wrote: > On Wed, Jun 29, 2016 at 3:03 AM, Daniel P. Berrange <berra...@redhat.com> > wrote: > > For those who aren't familiar, QEMU actually provides two completely > > different sets of emulators > > > >

Re: RFC: static builds for user emulators in Fedora QEMU RPMs

2016-06-29 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
On Wed, Jun 29, 2016 at 09:39:11AM -0400, Simo Sorce wrote: > On Wed, 2016-06-29 at 11:34 +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: > > On Wed, Jun 29, 2016 at 12:15:02PM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote: > > > On 06/29/2016 12:03 PM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: > > > > Debian

Re: RFC: static builds for user emulators in Fedora QEMU RPMs

2016-06-29 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
On Wed, Jun 29, 2016 at 12:15:02PM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote: > On 06/29/2016 12:03 PM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: > > Debian handles this by having several packages [1] > > > > - qemu-user - the dynamic linked qemu user binaries > > - qemu-binfmt - binfmt rules reg

RFC: static builds for user emulators in Fedora QEMU RPMs

2016-06-29 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
For those who aren't familiar, QEMU actually provides two completely different sets of emulators - system emulators - they emulate a full virtual machine and thus run a full guest OS. - user emulators - they emulate the Linux userspace ABI letting you run non-native arch executables

Re: First stage of glibc recvmsg/sendmsg ABI revert landed in rawhide

2016-06-13 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
On Mon, Jun 13, 2016 at 07:09:33AM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote: > glibc upstream, during development of the 2.24 release, introduced new > symbol versions recvmsg@GLIBC_2.24, sendmsg@GLIBC_2.24 (and > recvmmsg@GLIBC_2.24, sendmmsg@GLIBC_2.24 on 64-bit architectures), in order > to fix some minor

Re: Hardened build breaks gperftools / tcmalloc on 32 bit ARM

2016-02-29 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
On Mon, Feb 29, 2016 at 01:41:20PM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > Anyone understand what's going on here? Any program at all (even > trivial ones) linked to tcmalloc crash during startup on ARM 32 bit. > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1312462 > > At Tom's recommendation,

Re: GCC 6 -Wnonnull is too aggressive

2016-02-17 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
On Wed, Feb 17, 2016 at 05:43:51PM +0100, Petr Spacek wrote: > Hello, > > I'm facing problems with new behavior in GCC 6. > > Let's assume we have trivial program like this: > > $ cat assert.c > #include > #include > > __attribute__((nonnull)) > int f(char *txt) { > assert(txt !=

Re: F24 System Wide Change: Change Proposal Name NewRpmDBFormat

2016-01-13 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
On Wed, Jan 13, 2016 at 01:30:59PM +, Richard Hughes wrote: > On 13 January 2016 at 13:13, Reindl Harald wrote: > > so there is no justification to declare one need to install from scratch > > just because rpm which works for many years fine changes it's storage format

Re: Changes in F24 schedule - two weeks slip

2016-01-12 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
On Tue, Jan 12, 2016 at 09:02:08AM -0500, Josh Boyer wrote: > On Tue, Jan 12, 2016 at 8:58 AM, David Howells wrote: > > Jan Kurik wrote: > > > >> let me inform you about changes in Fedora 24 schedule. > >> > >> There is a will to accommodate GCC6 compiler

Re: F24 Self Contained Change: Astronomy Spin

2016-01-11 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 12:19:24PM +0100, Jan Kurik wrote: > = Proposed Self Contained Change: Astronomy Spin = > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Astronomy_Spin > > Change owner(s): > * Christian Dersch > > A Fedora Spin providing a complete toolchain for both amateur and > professional

Re: Do we need the Fedora 'virt' mailing list?

2015-09-16 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
On Wed, Sep 16, 2015 at 12:45:28PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > Crickets ... https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/virt/ > > The virt list has long been in an odd place. Fedora has best in class > virt support, because so many virt developers use it. It also follows > upstream very

Re: Do we need the Fedora 'virt' mailing list?

2015-09-16 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
On Wed, Sep 16, 2015 at 01:20:49PM +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: > On Wed, Sep 16, 2015 at 12:45:28PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > > > Crickets ... https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/virt/ > > > > The virt list has long been in an odd place. Fedora

Re: Proposal to reduce anti-bundling requirements

2015-09-10 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
On Thu, Sep 10, 2015 at 11:25:00AM -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote: > On Thu, 2015-09-10 at 16:04 +0100, Peter Robinson wrote: > > > > > I would like to propose that the no-bundled-libraries policy be > > > > > amended as follows: "Any package that has an existing > > > > > mechanism to > > > > >

Re: Do you know how many 64-bit architectures Fedora has?

2015-08-24 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
On Mon, Aug 24, 2015 at 09:18:16AM -0400, Neal Gompa wrote: ​Oh, yes! I was trying to find something like this all weekend for my Copr for reprepro. I have to make a patch to access apt-methods in /usr/lib64 on 64-bit systems, but on 32-bit systems it should remain /usr/lib. You just made

Re: and legacy software Re: pyorbit

2015-07-29 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 02:07:50PM +0200, Matěj Cepl wrote: On 2015-07-29, 10:47 GMT, Michael Schwendt wrote: As I have thought for some time, I think we should have a team to keep packages and make migrations like gtk2 to gkt3, libgnome2, pyorbit, gnome-python2, pyhton2 to python3 , qt3

Re: Hosting End-Of-Life Fedora Base images?

2015-07-21 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
On Tue, Jul 21, 2015 at 11:05:19AM -0500, Adam Miller wrote: On Mon, Jul 20, 2015 at 2:33 PM, Chris Murphy li...@colorremedies.com wrote: Isn't it true the install media ISOs are available indefinitely? And if so the security cat is already out of the bag, so that's not a very good

API change + soname bump of libvirt-sandbox 0.6.0

2015-07-01 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
The new libvirt-sandbox release 0.6.0 pushed to rawhide has a minor API change and corresponding soname bump of the library. I'll likely push this update to stable branches too, as it fixes a number of problems and I think its unlikely there are downstream apps linking to its library beyond the

[perl-Net-DBus/f22] Update to 1.1.0 release

2015-03-17 Thread Daniel P . Berrange
Summary of changes: d06f9cb... Update to 1.1.0 release (*) (*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[perl-Net-DBus] Update to 1.1.0 release

2015-03-16 Thread Daniel P . Berrange
commit d06f9cb378e024e546fa5dea2faa0ca407251652 Author: Daniel P. Berrange berra...@redhat.com Date: Mon Mar 16 20:48:11 2015 + Update to 1.1.0 release .gitignore | 6 -- perl-Net-DBus.spec | 11 +++ sources| 2 +- 3 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 7

File Net-DBus-1.1.0.tar.gz uploaded to lookaside cache by berrange

2015-03-16 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Net-DBus: da44a16f8abf1db76f5ccf50d9926944 Net-DBus-1.1.0.tar.gz -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

File Sys-Virt-1.2.13.tar.gz uploaded to lookaside cache by berrange

2015-03-06 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Sys-Virt: 80bd23071fbbe62c4c8c47c8770c48a9 Sys-Virt-1.2.13.tar.gz -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[perl-Sys-Virt] Update to 1.2.13 release

2015-03-06 Thread Daniel P . Berrange
commit 1f6dbba6c910217bf378fd8d94f72ac46559184d Author: Daniel P. Berrange berra...@redhat.com Date: Fri Mar 6 10:45:57 2015 + Update to 1.2.13 release perl-Sys-Virt.spec | 5 - sources| 2 +- 2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) --- diff --git a/perl-Sys

[perl-Sys-Virt/f22] Update to 1.2.13 release

2015-03-06 Thread Daniel P . Berrange
Summary of changes: 1f6dbba... Update to 1.2.13 release (*) (*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Firefox addon signing

2015-02-12 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
On Thu, Feb 12, 2015 at 12:47:27PM +0100, drago01 wrote: On Thu, Feb 12, 2015 at 11:15 AM, Nikos Roussos comzer...@fedoraproject.org wrote: On Thu, Feb 12, 2015 at 6:30 AM, Michael Cronenworth m...@cchtml.com wrote: I'm sure those that need to know, know, but for those that haven't

Re: Firefox addon signing

2015-02-12 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
On Thu, Feb 12, 2015 at 09:54:16AM -0500, Miloslav Trmač wrote: or simply exempt signature checking if the extension is on disk. They should check on download only. That would defeat the entire purpose; malware is very commonly sideloading extensions. If we only exempt extensions

[perl-Sys-Virt] Update to 1.2.12 release

2015-01-27 Thread Daniel P . Berrange
commit a946705bcb65263b7bf43dda6b80c57e94aefbaf Author: Daniel P. Berrange berra...@redhat.com Date: Tue Jan 27 11:18:05 2015 + Update to 1.2.12 release perl-Sys-Virt.spec |5 - sources|2 +- 2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) --- diff --git

File Sys-Virt-1.2.12.tar.gz uploaded to lookaside cache by berrange

2015-01-27 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Sys-Virt: 6b88d53b940998cc8bec755108d2cea5 Sys-Virt-1.2.12.tar.gz -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Python 3 as a Default - Status

2015-01-21 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 08:22:25AM -0500, Bohuslav Kabrda wrote: Hi all, since the Python 3 as a Default change [1] has been accepted a while ago and is scheduled for F22, I'd like to share with you the status. The proposed change [1] mentions several goals that should be reached to

[perl-Sys-Virt] Update to 1.2.11 release

2014-12-15 Thread Daniel P . Berrange
commit 66c057970a6e2c4c7951ed0391f1438e6ab2c7f5 Author: Daniel P. Berrange berra...@redhat.com Date: Mon Dec 15 15:39:00 2014 + Update to 1.2.11 release perl-Sys-Virt.spec |5 - sources|2 +- 2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) --- diff --git

File Sys-Virt-1.2.11.tar.gz uploaded to lookaside cache by berrange

2014-12-15 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Sys-Virt: 366672f8ac4abd2cc814a32fb10fa929 Sys-Virt-1.2.11.tar.gz -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Poll: How users use DNF

2014-12-10 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
On Tue, Dec 09, 2014 at 12:28:54PM -0500, Radek Holy wrote: Please share with me the use cases, not the description of the install command. Think twice before you share something because I believe it's not as easy as it might seem. As an example I think it might be something like: - I call

[perl-Sys-Virt/f21] (2 commits) ...Update to 1.2.9 release

2014-11-10 Thread Daniel P . Berrange
Summary of changes: 5ba4e34... Perl 5.20 rebuild (*) 49c0c35... Update to 1.2.9 release (*) (*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list

Re: upcoming libtool rebase (2.4.2 ~ 2.4.3)

2014-10-29 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
On Wed, Oct 29, 2014 at 03:20:31PM +0100, Pavel Raiskup wrote: Libtool upstream was able to cut the new release! I'll rebase the Rawhide package probably by the end of the next week or so, if there are no objections. Upstream maintainer calls this update fearless :) and that it needs a bit

Re: Improving the offline updates user experience

2014-10-23 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
On Thu, Oct 23, 2014 at 11:43:29AM +0100, Richard Hughes wrote: On 23 October 2014 09:56, Miroslav Suchý msu...@redhat.com wrote: The upgrade can last one hour (more or less). An hour?! Most of my offline updates take a few tens of seconds with F21. Is this on fairly up-to-date SSD

Re: What are the ELF shared lib symbol versioning best practices?

2014-10-21 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
On Tue, Oct 21, 2014 at 03:59:46PM +0100, David Howells wrote: Is there a good description of ELF shared library symbol versioning best practices somewhere? In particular, under what conditions do you need to create a new section in the versioning file given to the linker's --version-script

Re: Dash as default shell

2014-10-02 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
On Thu, Oct 02, 2014 at 08:07:14AM -0500, Chris Adams wrote: Once upon a time, Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com said: Changing the default /bin/sh is going to break the world. [citation needed] Anything that depends on bash as /bin/sh is already getting Fedora specific.

File Sys-Virt-1.2.9.tar.gz uploaded to lookaside cache by berrange

2014-10-02 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Sys-Virt: 47327538e8a57cd78e8f16d2b503 Sys-Virt-1.2.9.tar.gz -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[perl-Sys-Virt] Update to 1.2.9 release

2014-10-02 Thread Daniel P . Berrange
commit 49c0c35f01b1b11e35f2d6487249fcaeb5eb9f55 Author: Daniel P. Berrange berra...@redhat.com Date: Thu Oct 2 11:53:52 2014 +0100 Update to 1.2.9 release perl-Sys-Virt.spec |7 +-- sources|2 +- 2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) --- diff --git

  1   2   3   4   5   >