Re: RFC: OpenScanHub Prototype for Fedora

On Tue, 2023-12-12 at 16:30 +0100, Siteshwar Vashisht wrote: [...snip...] Hi Siteshwar, thanks for working on this. It looks like you're got the basic infrastructure of scanning working, but the prototype seems to be missing some things that IMHO would be essential to package maintainers

Re: F38 proposal: X Server Prohibits Byte-swapped Clients (System-Wide Change proposal)

On Thu, 2022-12-29 at 13:03 +1000, Peter Hutterer wrote: > On Thu, Dec 22, 2022 at 09:17:28PM +0100, Björn Persson wrote: > > Vít Ondruch wrote: > > > Dne 22. 12. 22 v 9:56 Olivier Fourdan napsal(a): > > > > When the connection fails, the Xserver returns a reason in > > > > plain text. > > > > In

Re: F37 proposal: Emacs 28 (Self-Contained Change proposal)

On Fri, 2022-07-22 at 22:50 +0200, Dan Čermák wrote: > David Malcolm writes: > > > On Mon, 2022-07-18 at 13:29 -0400, Ben Cotton wrote: > > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Emacs_28 > > > > > > This document represents a proposed Change. As part

Re: F37 proposal: Emacs 28 (Self-Contained Change proposal)

On Mon, 2022-07-18 at 13:29 -0400, Ben Cotton wrote: > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Emacs_28 > > This document represents a proposed Change. As part of the Changes > process, proposals are publicly announced in order to receive > community feedback. This proposal will only be

Re: Uninitialized variables and F37

On Tue, 2022-01-25 at 11:47 -0500, Steve Grubb wrote: > Hello Dave, > > On Tuesday, January 25, 2022 9:29:53 AM EST David Malcolm wrote: > > Steve, thanks for putting together these cases. > > > > I've filed: > >   https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10

Re: Uninitialized variables and F37

On Sat, 2022-01-22 at 15:00 -0500, Steve Grubb wrote: > On Saturday, January 22, 2022 6:36:01 AM EST Vitaly Zaitsev via devel > wrote: > > On 21/01/2022 19:04, Steve Grubb wrote: > > > Uninitialized variables are a big problem. > > > > Yes, but as a package maintainer, I don't want to deal with

Re: F35 Change: Package information on ELF objects (System-Wide Change proposal)

On Mon, 2021-04-12 at 15:46 -0400, Ben Cotton wrote: > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Package_information_on_ELF_objects > > == Summary == > All binaries (executables and shared libraries) are annotated with an > ELF > note that identifies the rpm distributing this file. > > == Owner ==

Re: F35 Change: Debuginfod By Default (Self-Contained Change proposal)

On Thu, 2021-04-08 at 11:19 -0400, Frank Ch. Eigler wrote: > > ngompa13 wrote: > > > Woohoo! I'm excited for this! > > Thanks! > > > I got a chance to use debuginfod to do some debugging of DNF on > > openSUSE last Saturday and the experience was fantastic. > > > > I'm looking forward to this

Re: Location of executable code

On Fri, 2020-05-22 at 10:30 -0400, Steve Grubb wrote: > Hello, > > I am working on our application whitelisting daemon. It uses the > rpmdb to > derive trust in what's on disk. If we use the whole rpmdb, then the > number of > files is large. So, to prune the amount of entries in the trust db >

Re: GCC 10 how disable redefinition of thing error ?

On Tue, 2020-02-04 at 21:13 -0500, David Malcolm wrote: > On Wed, 2020-02-05 at 01:38 +, Sérgio Basto wrote: > > Hi, > > Packages gpm, VirtualBox and webalizer have the building problem as > > described for gpm in [1] , but VirtualBox have thousands of lines > > wit

Re: GCC 10 how disable redefinition of thing error ?

On Wed, 2020-02-05 at 01:38 +, Sérgio Basto wrote: > Hi, > Packages gpm, VirtualBox and webalizer have the building problem as > described for gpm in [1] , but VirtualBox have thousands of lines > with > this error , I'd like disable this check on VirtualBox until > VirtualBox > fix it , >

Re: RFC: Python minimization in Fedora

On Thu, 2020-01-16 at 10:27 +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote: > On 15. 01. 20 23:11, Victor Stinner wrote: > > > Solution 4: ZIP the entire standard library > > > (...) > > > Nevertheless, this might (in theory) **save 17.8 MiB / 47 %**. > > > > It's my favorite option. Almost 50% smaller is quite good!

Re: Minimization Objective report

On Wed, 2019-11-20 at 11:22 -0500, Adam Jackson wrote: > On Wed, 2019-11-20 at 02:53 +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote: > > Adam Jackson wrote: > > > That's about 44M worth of potential savings out of a 204M base > > > image, a > > > bit over 20%. I'll happily file proper bug reports for these > > >

Re: Fedora 32 System-Wide Change proposal: Build Python 3 to statically link with libpython3.8.a for better performance

On Fri, 2019-11-15 at 16:28 +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote: > On 15. 11. 19 16:20, Vít Ondruch wrote: > > Dne 15. 11. 19 v 15:51 David Malcolm napsal(a): > > > On Fri, 2019-11-15 at 12:31 +, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote: > > > > On Fri, Nov 15, 2019 at 01:23:09

Re: Fedora 32 System-Wide Change proposal: Build Python 3 to statically link with libpython3.8.a for better performance

On Fri, 2019-11-15 at 12:31 +, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote: > On Fri, Nov 15, 2019 at 01:23:09PM +0100, Miroslav Suchý wrote: > > Dne 15. 11. 19 v 10:21 Victor Stinner napsal(a): > > > I'm not sure if we need a Fedora change just for a compiler flag. > > > Again, the only drawback is that we will

Orphaned package: python-rdflib

I no longer use python-rdflib, and I don't have the time to maintain it, so I've marked it as orphaned. Dave ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of

Re: Is there an independent lib for parsing Kerberos config files?

On Sat, 2018-09-01 at 08:44 +0100, David Howells wrote: > Hi, > > I've made the keyutils package use the profile parsing routines from > the > -lkrb5 library (the config data I need to parse is from an external > source, so > the format is already set). The problem is that some other >

Re: zram-generator

On Fri, 2018-08-24 at 20:24 +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > On Fri, Aug 24, 2018 at 04:15:53PM -0400, David Malcolm wrote: > > On Fri, 2018-08-24 at 17:11 +, Jeff Johnson wrote: > > > Why not Haskell? > > > > > > Seriously: you provide n

Re: zram-generator

On Fri, 2018-08-24 at 17:11 +, Jeff Johnson wrote: > Why not Haskell? > > Seriously: you provide no reason for rust other than that "C is not > attractive". > > C is surely a reliable implementation language for long running > system services. https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/658.html

Re: Why are we shipping debug builds of pythons?

On Mon, 2018-08-06 at 13:15 +0200, Jan Kratochvil wrote: > On Mon, 06 Aug 2018 10:57:31 +0200, Petr Viktorin wrote: > > On 08/05/18 14:01, Jan Kratochvil wrote: > > > That is all together messy. This is why Microsoft has their debug > > > build of > > > their whole OS - Windows - called Checked

Re: Why are we shipping debug builds of pythons?

On Mon, 2018-08-06 at 13:15 +0200, Jan Kratochvil wrote: > On Mon, 06 Aug 2018 10:57:31 +0200, Petr Viktorin wrote: > > On 08/05/18 14:01, Jan Kratochvil wrote: > > > That is all together messy. This is why Microsoft has their debug > > > build of > > > their whole OS - Windows - called Checked

Re: Why are we shipping debug builds of pythons?

gt; (often > from the master branch). > > I tracked down the introduction of the python-debug package in this > commit [1] by David Malcolm (CCed) @ 8 years ago, added in Fedora 14 > shortly before upgrade to 2.7. Yet the commit message lacks > rationale. > > [0] https:

Re: FESCo Elections - May 2018 : Results announcement

On Fri, 2018-06-15 at 00:01 +0200, Till Maas wrote: > On Thu, Jun 14, 2018 at 08:02:33AM -0500, Michael Cronenworth wrote: > > On 06/14/2018 03:42 AM, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: > > > I know we never manage to motivate many people to vote, but 86 > > > votes is really > > > low, even for us:( > >

Re: Escaping macros in %changelog

On Tue, 2018-02-13 at 12:07 -0800, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Mon, 2018-02-12 at 11:59 -0500, David Cantrell wrote: > > The dist-git changelogs are mostly noise and I would prefer better > > organized information about impacts to users and developers. Like > > tell > > me what things changed in

Re: hawkey replaced by libhif, DNF into C initiative started

On Thu, 2016-02-25 at 12:27 -0500, Neal Gompa wrote: > On Thu, Feb 25, 2016 at 12:25 PM, Matthew Miller > <mat...@fedoraproject.org> wrote: > > On Thu, Feb 25, 2016 at 12:03:52PM -0500, David Malcolm wrote: > > > "rewrite DNF in a language that can be com

Re: hawkey replaced by libhif, DNF into C initiative started

On Thu, 2016-02-25 at 05:42 -0500, Honza Šilhan wrote: > > From: "Josh Boyer" > > Could you please elaborate (perhaps in a separate thread) the full > > desire and requirements behind rewriting DNF into C? The first > > link > > in your email says the initiative is

Re: Removing packages that have broken dependencies in F22 tree, v2

On Tue, 2015-05-05 at 00:44 +0200, Kalev Lember wrote: Hi all, Here's another look at F22 broken dependencies. Since last week, we're down to just a handful of packages. Thanks to everybody who's helped out with cleaning this up! The goal is to ship Fedora releases with repos where all

Re: [EPEL-devel] Proposal for Python 3 packaging in EPEL 7

On Wed, 2015-01-07 at 06:05 -0500, Bohuslav Kabrda wrote: - Original Message - Hi all, I know I've been promising this for quite some time to several people, so I finally managed to put together a proposal for packaging Python 3 in EPEL 7 (it'd also scale to EPEL 6 for that

Re: F21 System Wide Change: Framework for Server Role Deployment

On Wed, 2014-04-09 at 08:45 -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote: On 04/09/2014 06:02 AM, drago01 wrote: On Tue, Apr 8, 2014 at 3:08 PM, Stephen Gallagher sgall...@redhat.com wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 04/08/2014 07:22 AM, drago01 wrote: On Tue, Apr 8, 2014 at

Re: F21 Self Contained Change: Security Policy In The Installer

On Thu, 2014-03-13 at 15:27 +0100, Vratislav Podzimek wrote: On Thu, 2014-03-13 at 09:00 -0400, Jan Lieskovsky wrote: There are many known tips and tricks how to make a system more secure, often depending on the use case for the system. With the OSCAP Anaconda Addon [1] and

Re: FDO and LTO (optimizations)

On Fri, 2013-12-20 at 14:10 -0500, Neal Becker wrote: I was reading some of the discussion of feedback directed optimization and link time optimization for python here: http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.python.devel/143941 I'm wondering if Fedora should be enabling some of these

Re: really stop really commits (really!)

On Fri, 2013-12-13 at 18:42 -0700, T.C. Hollingsworth wrote: Invariably when adding a patch to a spec, often I forget some detail, whether it be adding the %patchN macro to %prep or `git add`ing the patch. It would seem I'm not alone, either. A Google search for e.g.

Re: FTBFS if -Werror=format-security flag is used

On Fri, 2013-12-06 at 15:06 -0500, Darryl L. Pierce wrote: On Fri, Dec 06, 2013 at 02:27:05AM +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote: Michael scherer wrote: Let's rather ask the contrary, why is this so much a issue to communicate with upstream to fix things, and add patches ? The vast majority

Re: PyPy gains Python 3 support!

...and in case that gets dull, PyPy 2.1 was also just released :) http://doc.pypy.org/en/latest/release-2.1.0.html On Wed, 2013-07-31 at 03:10 -0400, Matej Stuchlik wrote: Consider it done! :) - Original Message - From: Bohuslav Kabrda bkab...@redhat.com To: Fedora Python SIG

PyPy gains Python 3 support!

Anyone want to package this for Fedora? It would be a different srpm to the pypy.srpm since the sources are different, but presumably the pypy.spec file could be used as a base. ---BeginMessage--- PyPy3 2.1 beta 1 We're pleased to announce the first beta of the

Orphaning some python packages and perl-Class-CSV

I'm not directly using these right now, and am trying to focus on gcc work, so I've orphaned the following: * perl-Class-CSV * python-numarray in EPEL5 * python-pefile * python-sqlparse * python-subprocess32 * python3-cherrypy * python3-postgresql -- devel mailing list

Re: Software Management call for RFEs

On Wed, 2013-05-22 at 22:18 +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: [...snip various points I agree with...] (3) RPM's spec file format needs to be redone using a Real Parser. At the moment it has all sorts of strange corner cases (for example, how to define a macro containing an arch-dependent

Re: Reassigning most of my packages to python-ma...@redhat.com

to: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/SIGs/Python On Tue, 2013-04-09 at 11:14 -0400, David Malcolm wrote: python-meliae -- Python memory usage statistics I can take this one. Though it seems that it's not actively developed anymore (only 1 commit in 2012 and 1 in 2013). Thanks - I've orphaned

Re: fedora release name problem

On Mon, 2013-03-18 at 23:11 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: On 18/03/13 10:22 PM, Toshio Kuratomi wrote: On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 05:56:28PM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: On Mon, 2013-03-18 at 18:34 -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote: On Mon, 18 Mar 2013 23:56:28 + Sérgio Basto ser...@serjux.com

Re: Abrt (was Re: Most buggy packages)

On Thu, 2013-02-21 at 22:41 +, Ian Malone wrote: On 21 February 2013 18:24, David Malcolm dmalc...@redhat.com wrote: On Wed, 2013-02-20 at 08:04 +, Ian Malone wrote: On 19 February 2013 12:13, David Malcolm dmalc...@redhat.com wrote: Question: does a python segfault from

Re: Abrt (was Re: Most buggy packages)

On Tue, 2013-02-19 at 11:43 -0500, Dave Jones wrote: On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 07:13:27AM -0500, David Malcolm wrote: I have a script that automates some of the workload of reassigning the component back to where the bug really is, but it currently requires some manual intervention

Re: Static Analysis: some UI ideas

On Mon, 2013-02-04 at 15:04 -0500, David Malcolm wrote: I've been experimenting with some UI ideas for reporting static analysis results: I've linked to two different UI reports below. [...snip...] I've updated the reports somewhat so that they can now show analysis failures were an analyzer

Re: Static Analysis: some UI ideas

On Tue, 2013-02-05 at 13:02 +0100, Kamil Dudka wrote: On Monday 04 February 2013 22:37:45 David Malcolm wrote: Content-addressed storage: they're named by SHA-1 sum of their contents, similar to how git does it, so if the bulk of the files don't change, they have the same SHA-1 sum

Static Analysis: firehose-devel mailing list

There's been some interest in using the proposed static analysis results format (Firehose) from the Debian side of the house so I've gone ahead and created: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/firehose-devel as a mailing list for discussion of the format, importers, etc. Dave --

Static Analysis: some UI ideas

I've been experimenting with some UI ideas for reporting static analysis results: I've linked to two different UI reports below. My hope is that we'll have a server in the Fedora infrastructure for browsing results, marking things as false positives etc. However, for the purposes of simplicity

Re: Static Analysis: some UI ideas

On Mon, 2013-02-04 at 22:13 +0100, Kamil Dudka wrote: On Monday, February 04, 2013 15:04:36 David Malcolm wrote: I've been experimenting with some UI ideas for reporting static analysis results: I've linked to two different UI reports below. My hope is that we'll have a server

Static Analysis: tweaks to data model and added cpychecker support

Short version: Updates to mock-with-analysis [1]: (a) changes to the data model (b) cpychecker support added Longer version: I've been hacking on mock-with-analysis, my tool for running static code analysis as a side-effect within a regular srpm rebuild (see [1]). I've tweaked the data model

Re: Static Analysis: results of FUDcon Lawrence hackfest

On Fri, 2013-01-25 at 13:03 +, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 12:51:13PM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 01:18:43PM +0100, Kamil Dudka wrote: On Friday, January 25, 2013 09:07:22 Richard W.M. Jones wrote: On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 02:11:11PM

Static Analysis: results of FUDcon Lawrence hackfest

Michael Hrivnak and I spent some time at FUDcon Lawrence looking at static code analysis. We hacked on the proposed common format for analysis tools (aka firehose). We now have parsers (and test suites) for coercing the following into a common format: * gcc warnings * cppcheck warnings

Re: Static Analysis: results of FUDcon Lawrence hackfest

On Thu, 2013-01-24 at 10:04 -0700, Jerry James wrote: On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 9:44 AM, David Malcolm dmalc...@redhat.com wrote: * packaging more static analyzers in Fedora (e.g. has anyone looked at Frama-C ?) Frama-C has been in Fedora for nearly 3 years now. :-) Aha! Thanks - yes, I

Re: Static Analysis: results of FUDcon Lawrence hackfest

On Thu, 2013-01-24 at 18:11 +0100, Alec Leamas wrote: On 2013-01-24 17:44, David Malcolm wrote: Michael Hrivnak and I spent some time at FUDcon Lawrence looking at static code analysis. We hacked on the proposed common format for analysis tools (aka firehose). [cut] The plan

Re: Static Analysis: proposed interchange format (firehose)

On Thu, 2013-01-17 at 13:33 +0800, Daniel Veillard wrote: On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 03:53:56PM -0500, David Malcolm wrote: This is a followup to my proposal in http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2012-December/175232.html I want a common output format for static analysis tools

Static Analysis: proposed interchange format (firehose)

This is a followup to my proposal in http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2012-December/175232.html I want a common output format for static analysis tools so that we can easily slurp the results from different tools into a database and have a common system for managing the results

Systemtap and PHP? (was Re: Proposed F19 Feature: PHP 5.5 - To provide the latest PHP stack)

On Tue, 2013-01-08 at 10:34 -0500, Jaroslav Reznik wrote: [...] = Features/Php55 = https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/Php55 [...snip...] Dtrace enabled build As I understand it, Fedora has systemtap but not dtrace (/usr/bin/dtrace is a shim to systemtap), so does this mean that

Re: Systemtap and PHP? (was Re: Proposed F19 Feature: PHP 5.5 - To provide the latest PHP stack)

On Tue, 2013-01-08 at 19:23 +0100, Tomasz Torcz wrote: On Tue, Jan 08, 2013 at 01:05:39PM -0500, David Malcolm wrote: On Tue, 2013-01-08 at 10:34 -0500, Jaroslav Reznik wrote: [...] = Features/Php55 = https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/Php55 [...snip...] Dtrace enabled

Re: Systemtap and PHP? (was Re: Proposed F19 Feature: PHP 5.5 - To provide the latest PHP stack)

On Tue, 2013-01-08 at 19:29 +0100, Remi Collet wrote: Le 08/01/2013 19:05, David Malcolm a écrit : On Tue, 2013-01-08 at 10:34 -0500, Jaroslav Reznik wrote: [...] = Features/Php55 = https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/Php55 [...snip...] Dtrace enabled build As I

Static Analysis SIG ? (was Re: Dealing with static code analysis in Fedora)

On Thu, 2012-12-13 at 21:45 +0200, Alek Paunov wrote: On 11.12.2012 23:52, David Malcolm wrote: We'd be able to run all of the code in Fedora through static analysis tools, and slurp the results into the database Dave, I really do not know what to say first :-). The subject is so

Re: Dealing with static code analysis in Fedora

On Wed, 2012-12-12 at 01:00 -0200, Paulo César Pereira de Andrade wrote: (Thanks; various replies inline below) 2012/12/11 David Malcolm dmalc...@redhat.com: A while back I ran my static checker on all of the Python extension modules in Fedora 17: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features

Re: Dealing with static code analysis in Fedora

might encourage Uwe to use and recommend Fedora. Hope that makes sense Sources: http://git.fedorahosted.org/cgit/faf.git/ RFE: https://fedorahosted.org/abrt/newticket?component=faf Michal ABRT [1] http://abrt.fedoraproject.org On 2012-12-11 22:52, David Malcolm wrote: A while back I

Re: Dealing with static code analysis in Fedora

On Wed, 2012-12-12 at 15:03 -0500, Steve Grubb wrote: On Wednesday, December 12, 2012 01:00:36 AM Paulo César Pereira de Andrade wrote: A while back I ran my static checker on all of the Python extension modules in Fedora 17:

Dealing with static code analysis in Fedora

A while back I ran my static checker on all of the Python extension modules in Fedora 17: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/StaticAnalysisOfPythonRefcounts I wrote various scripts to build the packages in a mock environment that injects my checker into gcc, then wrote various scripts to

A minimal subset of python (was Re: [@core] working definition for the minimal package set)

On Mon, 2012-11-12 at 11:28 -0500, Matthew Miller wrote: Okay, cool -- there's a lot of enthusiasm for a SIG for the core package set. So, first up on the SIG goals: clarifying our target. It's been suggested before that there's so many possibilities that this is useless, but the point

Re: modules, firmware, kernel size (was Re: systemd requires HTTP server and serves QR codes)

On Wed, 2012-10-17 at 11:38 -0700, Jesse Keating wrote: On 10/17/2012 11:32 AM, Chris Adams wrote: I would think the only sane way would be to just change the packaing, not actually build multiple kernels (or even multiple packages with kernels). For example, a kernel-minimal that has

Re: systemd requires HTTP server and serves QR codes

On Tue, 2012-10-09 at 20:20 +0300, Panu Matilainen wrote: On 10/09/2012 08:15 PM, Lennart Poettering wrote: On Tue, 09.10.12 10:54, Seth Vidal (skvi...@fedoraproject.org) wrote: On Tue, 9 Oct 2012, Matthew Miller wrote: On Tue, Oct 09, 2012 at 10:18:27AM -0400, Seth Vidal wrote:

Re: Packages in need of new maintainers UPDATED LIST

On Tue, 2012-10-09 at 10:41 -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote: On 10/05/2012 01:32 PM, Jon Ciesla wrote: mod_python -- An embedded Python interpreter for the Apache HTTP Server Last I heard, this was a dead project. Probably it's time to retire this one in favor of mod_wsgi. FWIW mod_python

Re: brp-python-hardlink fails on files that include spaces

On Tue, 2012-09-25 at 09:39 -0700, Toshio Kuratomi wrote: On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 01:42:52PM +0200, Tadej Janež wrote: Hello! I've reported this issue with brp-python-hardlink back in January: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=783433 Could someone (a provenpackager) please

Re: request python-docutils update for f18

On Wed, 2012-09-05 at 13:39 -0400, Neal Becker wrote: mercurial-2.3.1 will not build on f18 because of the python-docutils version. It does build on f17, and also on f19. f19 has python-docutils-0.10-0.6.20120824svn7502.fc19.src.rpm f18 has this update:

Re: Switching to Python 3

On Mon, 2012-08-13 at 20:53 -0400, David Malcolm wrote: On Mon, 2012-08-13 at 03:09 -0400, Bohuslav Kabrda wrote: - Original Message - On 08/06/2012 04:22 AM, Toshio Kuratomi wrote: The only distribution that has switched is arch. When they did there was a big uproar

Re: Boost and Python 3 in f18

On Tue, 2012-08-07 at 01:22 +0200, Petr Machata wrote: Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com writes: On Mon, Aug 6, 2012 at 11:33 AM, David Malcolm dmalc...@redhat.com wrote: Feature freeze for Fedora 18 is tomorrow (2012-08-07), and git is about to be branched after that for Fedora 19, as per

Re: Python 3.3 (was Re: rawhide report: 20120804 changes)

On Sun, 2012-08-05 at 12:26 +0100, Paul Howarth wrote: On Sat, 04 Aug 2012 11:27:38 -0400 David Malcolm dmalc...@redhat.com wrote: On Sat, 2012-08-04 at 12:32 +, Fedora Rawhide Report wrote: Compose started at Sat Aug 4 08:15:03 UTC 2012 Broken deps for x86_64

Re: Boost and Python 3 in f18

On Mon, 2012-08-06 at 11:51 +0200, Petr Machata wrote: David Malcolm dmalc...@redhat.com writes: On Sat, 2012-08-04 at 21:30 +0530, Parag N(पराग़) wrote: Thanks. But I am getting this error for xs package scratch build. DEBUG util.py:257: -- gc-devel-7.2c-3.fc18.x86_64 DEBUG

Python 3.3 (was Re: rawhide report: 20120804 changes)

On Sat, 2012-08-04 at 12:32 +, Fedora Rawhide Report wrote: Compose started at Sat Aug 4 08:15:03 UTC 2012 Broken deps for x86_64 -- [...snip numerous missing deps of the form requires python(abi) = 0:3.2 requires

Boost and Python 3 in f18 (was Re: Python 3.3 (was Re: rawhide report: 20120804 changes))

On Sat, 2012-08-04 at 21:30 +0530, Parag N(पराग़) wrote: Hi, On Sat, Aug 4, 2012 at 8:57 PM, David Malcolm dmalc...@redhat.com wrote: On Sat, 2012-08-04 at 12:32 +, Fedora Rawhide Report wrote: Compose started at Sat Aug 4 08:15:03 UTC 2012 Broken deps for x86_64

Re: Switching to Python 3

On Fri, 2012-08-03 at 04:53 -0400, Andrew Parker wrote: [...snip...] I don't think there are RPM bindings for python3 yet, although it looks like it is getting closer: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=531543 The bindings are done; they're just waiting on review of that change to the

Re: F17 updates broke anaconda PNG image handling

On Tue, 2012-07-24 at 20:32 +0200, Jos Vos wrote: Hi, While an anaconda/systemd problem is being worked on (bug #841822), now my next problem when making new F17 spins including all updates: anaconda can't display PNG images anymore. For all images it tries to open (and all these images

Re: [announce] yum: parallel downloading

On Wed, 2012-05-16 at 12:07 -0400, Zdenek Pavlas wrote: Hi, A new yum and urlgrabber packages have just hit Rawhide. These releases include some new features, including parallel downloading of packages and metadata, and a new mirror selection code. As we plan to include these features in

Fedora 18 schedule and Python 3.3

Do we have a schedule for Fedora 18 yet? I've started creating a feature page for getting Python 3.3 into Fedora: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/Python_3.3 but it's not clear to me yet how well the Python 3.3 upstream schedule lines up with Fedora's schedule. So for now I've simply

Re: Fedora 18 schedule and Python 3.3

On Mon, 2012-04-16 at 17:39 -0400, Jared K. Smith wrote: On Mon, Apr 16, 2012 at 5:11 PM, David Malcolm dmalc...@redhat.com wrote: Do we have a schedule for Fedora 18 yet? Robyn is great at keeping the scedules updated -- they're typically in her directory on fedorapeople.org. Here

Re: Hi I'm Anthony Sasadeusz and I want to help package

On Wed, 2012-03-14 at 16:41 -0700, Anthony Sasadeusz wrote: Hi, I want to try to get involved with the open source community. I am a junior at University of Maryland Baltimore County studying Computer Engineering. My goal is to eventually help out with the JBOSS packaging for Googles summer of

Re: Torvalds:requiring root password for mundane things is moronic

On Wed, 2012-02-29 at 07:02 -0500, Neal Becker wrote: I think he's got a point http://www.osnews.com/story/25659/Torvalds_requiring_root_password_for_mundane_things_is_quot_moronic_quot_ http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/FeaturePolicyKit in Fedora 8 onwards, It was revamped in Fedora

Re: F17 Slowness

On Thu, 2012-02-16 at 12:06 -0500, Dave Jones wrote: On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 10:44:45AM -0600, Mike Chambers wrote: Just seeing if it's just me, or we back to being slow again during testing with the debug options and the kernel? Am on a F16 kernel and is little better than F17 3.3

Re: F17 Slowness

On Thu, 2012-02-16 at 15:16 -0600, Bruno Wolff III wrote: On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 14:40:53 -0500, David Malcolm dmalc...@redhat.com wrote: On Thu, 2012-02-16 at 12:06 -0500, Dave Jones wrote: On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 10:44:45AM -0600, Mike Chambers wrote: Just seeing if it's just me

Stray Python 3 bytecode files in rawhide(f17) (bug 722578)

Python 3.2's distutils was byte-compiling .py files to the wrong location, putting the .pyc/.pyo files in the same directory as the .py files, rather than in the __pycache__ subdirectory. This has led to some python3 packages having duplicate .pyc files in their payloads:

Re: GDBM upgrade in F17

On Wed, 2011-09-21 at 10:59 +, Petr Pisar wrote: Jan Horak (hhorak) is going to upgrade GDBM to version with new SONAME in F17. Because rel-engs refused to provide dedicated build root, the upgrade will be performed in F17 directly. That means Perl, Pyhon and other default-build-root

Re: Kudos to Tom Spot Callaway

On Tue, 2011-09-13 at 12:24 +0200, Jos Vos wrote: On Tue, Sep 13, 2011 at 12:05:29PM +0200, Matej Cepl wrote: The fact that it is important for Fedora users, doesn't mean it must be in the official Fedora repos (see MP3 codecs or other lovely programs in non-Fedora repos). [...] I

Re: submitters +1ing their own packages

On Wed, 2011-09-07 at 18:38 +0100, Richard Hughes wrote: On 7 September 2011 01:02, Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com wrote: Is this a Bodhi bug? Or does FESCo expect voluntary compliance / case-by-case enforcement of this policy? I'm guilty of this too; when I file an update that's not

Re: submitters +1ing their own packages

On Thu, 2011-09-08 at 22:21 +0200, Till Maas wrote: On Thu, Sep 08, 2011 at 03:33:33PM -0400, David Malcolm wrote: package for a while. If I'm happy with my subsequent testing, then I'll +1 my own update, on the grounds that I've been viewing the change from a testing perspective, rather

Re: Fedora rawhide FTBFS status 2011-06-16 x86_64

On Wed, 2011-06-22 at 19:17 -0500, Matt Domsch wrote: Fedora Fails To Build From Source Results for x86_64 using rawhide from 2011-06-16 Good hunting! Full logs at http://linux.dell.com/files/fedora/FixBuildRequires/ pypy-1.5-1.fc16 (build/make) dmalcolm,tomspur I don't see a directory

Re: GNOME3 and au revoir WAS: systemd: please stop trying to take over the world :)

On Fri, 2011-06-17 at 09:44 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: On Sat, 2011-06-18 at 00:30 +0900, 夜神 岩男 wrote: On Fri, 2011-06-17 at 10:04 -0400, Bernd Stramm wrote: On Fri, 17 Jun 2011 19:33:18 +0900 夜神 岩男 supergiantpot...@yahoo.co.jp wrote: Considering the frequent calls of Gnome

Re: Fedora 14 and Sandy Bridge graphics

On Sun, 2011-06-12 at 20:02 +0200, Reindl Harald wrote: Am 12.06.2011 19:28, schrieb Lucas: Strange, I did exactly the same thing with Fedora 14, I add new kernel, changed xorg and intel driver. But I have i686. mhh - strange - an trying to update glibc results in chaos Datei oder

Re: systemd memory usage

On Fri, 2011-06-10 at 15:55 -0400, Adam Jackson wrote: On 6/10/11 9:07 AM, Denys Vlasenko wrote: At the very least, I would like to see its memory consumption to go down substantially. Let's try to turn this into something constructive. I'll start with David Malcolm's rather nifty, if

Re: best practices for python applications targeting f11 gnome on the olpc xo

On Mon, 2011-01-24 at 16:57 -0500, Erik Blankinship wrote: What would be the best practice for python applications targeting f11 gnome on the olpc xo? I am developing on f13, but my target is f11 (an olpc xo machine) running python 2.6. Both f13 and f11 had Python 2.6, though slightly

Re: firewalld - A firewall daemon with D-BUS interface providing a dynamic firewall (test version)

On Thu, 2010-12-23 at 17:03 +0100, Thomas Woerner wrote: Hello, as discussed some time ago, I worked on the proof of concept implementation of firewalld. FirewallD is a service daemon with a D-BUS interface that provides a dynamic managed firewall. For more information on firewalld,

Re: New contributed package available for review: ax_emergency_listen

On Mon, 2011-01-03 at 20:22 +0100, Guido Trentalancia wrote: On Tue, 04/01/2011 at 00.45 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote: On 01/04/2011 12:38 AM, Guido Trentalancia wrote: The package contains a manual page, it supports building using autoconf and automake and it just needs to be reviewed.

PyPy is now available in Fedora

I've imported pypy and built it into rawhide. I've updated the list on: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/SIGs/Python#Python_Runtimes moving it from Awaiting review to Within Fedora. Enjoy! Dave ---BeginMessage--- I've packaged pypy in RPM form for the Fedora distribution [1] - RPM packages are

Re: rawhide report: 20101230 changes

On Thu, 2010-12-30 at 13:10 +, Rawhide Report wrote: Broken deps for x86_64 -- ... dpm-python3-1.8.0.1-3.fc15.x86_64 requires libpython3.2.so.1.0()(64bit) lfc-python3-1.8.0.1-3.fc15.x86_64 requires

Python 3 ABI change (PEP 3149)

I've built python-3.2b2 into rawhide as python3-3.2-0.6.b2.fc15 http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=212004 This version is the first to hit rawhide with PEP 3149, which is another ABI change. It's a somewhat ironic change, in that the in-DSO ABI hasn't really changed, so much as

Re: abrt wishlist

On Thu, 2010-12-09 at 10:51 -0500, Adam Jackson wrote: Here's some of my pet irritations with abrt. Feel free to add your own, but please keep the gratuitous me tooing to a minimum. 1) The generated reports contain far too little information for library owners. Consider this report:

Re: Fixing the glibc adobe flash incompatibility

On Thu, 2010-11-18 at 21:12 -0800, Jesse Keating wrote: On 11/18/10 10:58 AM, Doug Ledford wrote: - Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com wrote: On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 10:29:56PM -0500, Gregory Maxwell wrote: Most code is not performance critical. Much more code than you think is

Re: bugzilla bugzappers?

On Wed, 2010-11-03 at 21:02 -0400, Orcan Ogetbil wrote: On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 4:41 PM, Bert Desmet wrote: hi! This is something I got in my mail box today. As I don't have a valid answer for this, maybe someone else can answer for me? cheers, Bert the url of the blog of the

  1   2   >