Re: This is bad, was Re: Fedora 33 System-Wide Change proposal: systemd-resolved

2020-09-28 Thread Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
On Monday, 28 September 2020 at 15:30, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: [...] > What was the setup you were using? If this is something that we can > reliably detect, I think it it would make sense to adjust the scriptlet > that enables systemd-resolved to print a hint about needing to set

Re: F34 Change proposal: Move deprecated bluetooth utilities to subpackage (Self-Contained Change)

2020-09-25 Thread Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
On Thursday, 24 September 2020 at 17:54, Ben Cotton wrote: > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/BluetoothDeprecated > > == Summary == > Move deprecated bluez bluetooth utilities to a sub package to indicate > their status. [...] > == User Experience == > > Users shouldn't notice any

Test machines for maintainers (was: btrfs and default page sizes (4k vs 64k))

2020-09-19 Thread Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
Hi, Kevin. On Friday, 18 September 2020 at 19:46, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > On Fri, Sep 18, 2020 at 10:08:46AM -0400, Neal Gompa wrote: > > On Fri, Sep 18, 2020 at 10:07 AM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek > > wrote: > > > > > > On Wed, Sep 16, 2020 at 02:09:42PM -0400, Neal Gompa wrote: > > > > I'm

Re: maybe a path forward for java and modules? [was Re: The Future of the Java Stack (also regarding ELN and RHEL)]

2020-09-18 Thread Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
On Friday, 18 September 2020 at 11:22, Petr Pisar wrote: > On Thu, Sep 17, 2020 at 12:51:46PM -0400, Matthew Miller wrote: > > So: RH Java packagers, what if you build these packages as non-modular > > (maybe using some scripting to make it happen at the same time as modular > > builds?) and

Re: The Future of the Java Stack (also regarding ELN and RHEL)

2020-09-10 Thread Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
On Thursday, 10 September 2020 at 14:50, Joe Orton wrote: [...] > 1.  The team has two missions in Fedora: > > a) We deliver, maintain and support Ant and Maven in Fedora. Our aim > is to provide developers with the most popular Java build systems > which are reviewed, tested, and updated through

Re: noarch packages only for some architecture composes

2020-09-09 Thread Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
On Tuesday, 08 September 2020 at 23:55, Michel Alexandre Salim wrote: > On Mon, 2020-09-07 at 13:15 +0200, Fabio Valentini wrote: > > On Mon, Sep 7, 2020 at 1:02 PM Florian Weimer > > wrote: > > > Is it possible to include a noarch package only in some of the > > > composes? > > > > ... > > I

Re: Is s390 (32-bit) relevant for Fedora alt arch ?

2020-09-04 Thread Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
On Friday, 04 September 2020 at 11:00, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote: > I'm looking at cleaning up some parts of the QEMU spec and we have > conditionals in there testing for s390 arch (aka 32-bit). IIRC it > was previously a secondary arch, at least back in the Fedora 22-ish > timeframe. I'm not

Re: New version of net-snmp + soname bump

2020-08-26 Thread Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
On Wednesday, 26 August 2020 at 11:15, Josef Ridky wrote: > Hi folks, > > upstream authors has released new major version of net-snmp that is > now heading to Rawhide and F33. As part of this update, soname will > change from .35 to .40. > > I would like to ask all maintainers, that rely on

Non-responsive maintainer check: parasense

2020-08-19 Thread Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
Hello! It seems Jon Disnard (parasense) hasn't been responding to bugzilla tickets for a number of years. His last package build was done in April 2017: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/userinfo?userID=2504 I have opened the mandatory non-responsive check bug:

Re: What is the real value of Release and %changelog metadata?

2020-08-19 Thread Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
On Wednesday, 19 August 2020 at 10:54, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote: [...] > I think the value of the %changelog for debugging problems on a host > is overstated in general though. In most cases I find the entries are > just too terse to be useful, especially when you have packages where > the only

Re: New libxmlb 0.2.0 which breaks API and ABI

2020-08-18 Thread Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
On Tuesday, 18 August 2020 at 16:40, Richard Hughes wrote: > Hi all, > > I'm going to build the recently released libxmlb 0.2.0 into rawhide > and F33. It has two consumers (fwupd and gnome-software) both of which > I own, and I'll rebuild them at the same time. Any problems please > shout. Can

Re: Orphaning openbabel

2020-08-06 Thread Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
On Thursday, 30 July 2020 at 19:18, Alexander Ploumistos wrote: [...] > Given the time of the year in the Northern Hemisphere, do you think > you could hold on to the package a little longer (e.g. until the > beginning of September), so that people who are interested might get > the chance to get

Re: Orphaning openbabel

2020-08-06 Thread Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
On Friday, 31 July 2020 at 11:04, Kevin Kofler wrote: [...] > We will likely also need an openbabel2 compatibility package then, because I > doubt that everything will build against OpenBabel 3 without non-trivial > porting. This is the porting guide:

Re: Test machines for s390x?

2020-08-06 Thread Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
On Thursday, 06 August 2020 at 18:45, Dan Horák wrote: [...] > Kevin, shall I try to get a guest from Marist we could use as the stable > test/devel machine? Like we do with the ppc64le machine from the > OpenPOWER hub. By the way, do you have a reliable support contact at the OpenPOWER hub? I've

[EPEL-devel] using newer nodejs from SCL on EPEL7

2020-08-05 Thread Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
Dear all, I'm attempting to package binaryen for Fedora (and EPEL7+)[1]. Unlike Debian[2], I want to run its testsuite in %check. The testsuite uses nodejs to run some of the optional tests, but it needs a newer nodejs than the EOL'd version 6 that is in EPEL7 repo. I'd like to have the same

Re: Proposed Modular Policy for Fedora ELN

2020-08-05 Thread Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
Hi, Stephen. On Wednesday, 05 August 2020 at 21:36, Stephen Gallagher wrote: > FESCo has requested that I submit the module policy once more to the > Fedora development list for discussion. Feedback is welcome. [...] > * The default stream of a module *MUST NOT* change to a different > stream

Re: Driverless scanning for WSD and ESCL supported scanners is coming

2020-08-05 Thread Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
On Wednesday, 05 August 2020 at 07:44, Zdenek Dohnal wrote: > Hi all, > > I would like to announce sane-airscan project [1] will be shipped in the > official Fedora repositories from Fedora 32 [2]. > > sane-airscan implements a backend for Microsoft WSD and ESCL (usually > called AirScan,

Re: Duplicate package was reviewed

2020-07-30 Thread Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
On Thursday, 30 July 2020 at 17:11, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote: > On 30.07.2020 10:03, Kevin Kofler wrote: > > Independently of what the current packaging guidelines say about this > > (apparently, "compat-" is not even a thing anymore there, see Rathann's > > reply), it simply does not make

Orphaning openbabel

2020-07-30 Thread Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
Hi everyone, I've finally admitted to myself that I have no time to take good care of openbabel: https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/openbabel It has one FTBFS bug in rawhide (related to cmake macro changes) and two requests to update. One in Fedora to move to the recent 3.x series and one for EPEL

Re: Duplicate package was reviewed

2020-07-29 Thread Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
On Wednesday, 29 July 2020 at 20:06, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote: > On 29.07.2020 19:33, Brendan Early wrote: > > Can you please explain what you mean by conflicts? They are in > > completely different directories. > > Libqmatrixclient is a very old version of libquotient. Compatibility >

Re: F33 Change proposal: DXVK as default wined3d backend on VK capable hardware (Self-Contained Change)

2020-07-29 Thread Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
On Thursday, 23 July 2020 at 15:48, Frantisek Zatloukal wrote: > On Thu, Jul 23, 2020 at 2:18 PM Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski < > domi...@greysector.net> wrote: > > > Is Vulkan supported on AMD Radeon HD 7900 series (TAHITI)? Some > > sources I fou

Re: As a developer I want to easily execute/enable tests

2020-07-23 Thread Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
On Wednesday, 22 July 2020 at 14:49, Petr Šplíchal wrote: > Hi! > > I am writing today to share a proposal for how we can make it > easier to enable tests in Fedora CI. > > We've heard the user story mentioned in the subject many times. > Fedora developers have frequently mentioned the

Re: F33 Change proposal: DXVK as default wined3d backend on VK capable hardware (Self-Contained Change)

2020-07-23 Thread Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
On Thursday, 23 July 2020 at 13:40, Neal Gompa wrote: > On Tue, Jul 21, 2020 at 10:45 AM Ben Cotton wrote: > > > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/DXVKwined3d > > > > == Summary == > > Proposal to replace default wined3d backend with DXVK, A > > Vulkan-based translation layer for Direct3D

Re: Fedora 33 System-Wide Change proposal: CMake to do out-of-source builds

2020-07-20 Thread Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
On Monday, 20 July 2020 at 21:39, Neal Gompa wrote: > On Mon, Jul 20, 2020 at 3:32 PM Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski > wrote: [...] > > Sorry, but when you break other packagers workflows, the least you > > can do is provide a clean solution to make them work again. M

Re: cmake-3.18.0-2.fc33 (or 3.18.0-1.fc33.1) in rawhide is broken!

2020-07-20 Thread Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
On Monday, 20 July 2020 at 19:37, Neal Gompa wrote: > On Mon, Jul 20, 2020 at 1:29 PM Kaleb Keithley wrote: > > > > > > On 2020-07-17 I built ceph-15.2.4-5 (and ceph-15.2.4-6 --target=f33-java11) > > with cmake-3.18.0-1.fc33 and the build(s) were successful. > > > > Today, with

Re: Fedora 33 System-Wide Change proposal: CMake to do out-of-source builds

2020-07-20 Thread Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
On Wednesday, 08 July 2020 at 15:19, Igor Raits wrote: > On Wed, 2020-07-08 at 14:13 +0200, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote: > > On 07.07.2020 19:57, Orion Poplawski wrote: > > > What's the plan for EPEL8/7 compatibility? > > > > +1. The new Cmake macros behaviour must be backported to EPEL7/8. >

Re: cmake-3.18.0-2.fc33 (or 3.18.0-1.fc33.1) in rawhide is broken!

2020-07-20 Thread Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
On Monday, 20 July 2020 at 20:46, Kamil Dudka wrote: > On Monday, July 20, 2020 8:35:37 PM CEST Neal Gompa wrote: > > Or you could just use "%global __cmake_in_source_build 1" which > > reverts to the previous behavior. > > That does not make any sense. The packages I talk about have used > out

Re: Ditch RPM in favor of DPKG

2020-07-18 Thread Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
On Saturday, 18 July 2020 at 12:19, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote: > On Sat, Jul 18, 2020 at 1:21 AM Anthony F McInerney wrote: > > On Sat, 18 Jul 2020 at 04:19, John M. Harris Jr > > wrote: > >> > >> On Thursday, July 16, 2020 3:11:19 AM MST Dridi Boukelmoune wrote: > >> > there was no reason not to

matroska stack update (soname bumps)

2020-07-17 Thread Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
Hello, I'm updating the matroska stack to the latest upstream versions, including stable branches as the libraries are security sensitive. libebml and libmatroska come with soname bumps but no incompatible API changes. I tested the rebuilds in copr in advance. I'm rebuilding all dependent

Re: FlexiBLAS as BLAS/LAPACK manager - Fedora 33 System-Wide Change proposal

2020-07-17 Thread Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
On Friday, 17 July 2020 at 10:25, Dave Love wrote: > [I found I hadn't sent this earlier, as I should have.] > > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/FlexiBLAS_as_BLAS/LAPACK_manager > > > > == Summary == > > BLAS/LAPACK packages will be compiled against the FlexiBLAS wrapper > > library,

Re: The future of legacy BIOS support in Fedora.

2020-07-10 Thread Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
Hello, Faye. On Saturday, 04 July 2020 at 00:42, Faye C. wrote: [...] > Because of the way Windows 10 is, UEFI is the only thing that is > accepted (no Legacy Boot). If I try any other OS on UEFI my laptop > can't find the disc image. It somehow seems to be designed only for > Windows 10. Legacy

orphaning gabedit

2020-07-10 Thread Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
Cc'ing SciTech SIG as this is a science-related package. Hello! I'm orphaning gabedit. It has two bugs open: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/buglist.cgi?bug_status=__open__=gabedit=Fedora Last release was in February this year, so upstream is not dead, but I don't have time to maintain it anymore

Re: Using "rawhide" for the dist-git branch for Fedora Rawhide

2020-07-08 Thread Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
On Wednesday, 08 July 2020 at 16:29, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: > On Wed, Jul 08, 2020 at 10:09:35AM -0400, Kaleb Keithley wrote: > >Whatever name is picked: devel, main, rawhide, next, etc.,  how about > >setting the default branch. > >E.g. `git symbolic-ref HEAD refs/heads/rawhide` >

Re: [Fedora-packaging] RPM-level auto release and changelog bumping - Fedora 33 System-Wide Change proposal

2020-07-01 Thread Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
On Tuesday, 30 June 2020 at 21:19, Ben Cotton wrote: > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/rpm_level_auto_release_and_changelog_bumping > > == Summary == > > redhat-rpm-config will be updated so users of the auto framework get > automated release and changelog bumping. > > == Owner == > > *

[EPEL-devel] Re: Questions about installing epel-release

2020-07-01 Thread Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
Hi, On Tuesday, 30 June 2020 at 04:17, Wei, Catherine wrote: [...] > * Results of rpm -V epel-release and rpm -qi epel-release > [root@katt-shanghai katt-server-install]# rpm -V epel-release > [root@katt-shanghai katt-server-install]# rpm -qi epel-release > Name: epel-release >

[EPEL-devel] Re: Questions about installing epel-release

2020-06-29 Thread Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
On Monday, 29 June 2020 at 03:27, Wei, Catherine wrote: > Thanks. I fixed this by changing the reposdir=/etc/yum.163.yum.repos.d > to /etc/yum.repos.d/, then the epel repository can be found. There are no such references in the epel-release package. Have you downloaded the package over HTTPS? Can

Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers (~200 nodejs packages to be retired in 2 days)

2020-06-22 Thread Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
On Monday, 22 June 2020 at 17:17, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote: > On 22.06.2020 17:09, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote: > > Cc'ing fmt maintainers. > > fmt co-maintainer here. Sorry, but I don't like nodejs, so I don't want > to take them. I wasn't asking for that

Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers (~200 nodejs packages to be retired in 2 days)

2020-06-22 Thread Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
On Monday, 22 June 2020 at 14:36, Miro Hrončok wrote: [...] > Full report available at: > https://churchyard.fedorapeople.org/orphans-2020-06-22.txt > grep it for your FAS username and follow the dependency chain. > > Package (co)maintainers Status >

Re: Fedora 33 System-Wide Change proposal: Use %make_build and %make_install macros

2020-06-21 Thread Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
On Saturday, 20 June 2020 at 09:20, Kamil Dudka wrote: > On Saturday, June 20, 2020 12:17:26 AM CEST Tomasz Kłoczko wrote: > > All parallel build issues should be treated *as critical bugs* > > which should be *ASAP fixed*. > > > > kloczek > > Seriously, are you saying that bugs causing slower

Re: RHEL 9 and modularity

2020-06-19 Thread Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
On Friday, 19 June 2020 at 11:58, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote: [...] > I can only see this being solvable if non-default modules streams are > required to be built into a unique /opt prefix instead of /usr. Are you trying to re-invent the SCLs? Regards, Dominik -- Fedora https://getfedora.org |

Re: Datacenter move day 2

2020-06-10 Thread Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
On Wednesday, 10 June 2020 at 08:24, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > Greetings everyone. > > Just a quick recap of our day 2 datacenter move. Thanks for all your hard work and for providing these (not so little) updates! I hope you get some well-deserved rest after all is done. Regards, Dominik --

orphaning mnemosyne

2020-06-09 Thread Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
Dear list, I'm orphaning mnemosyne [1] as I don't have time to maintain it. It lags[2] behind upstream a bit (2.6.1 vs. 2.7), but updating requires packaging a few new dependencies. It's failing under Python 3.9, too[3]. First order fix is trivial (s/cElementTree/ElementTree/g'), but after that

Re: Proposal: Install gparted to Live installers

2020-06-04 Thread Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
On Thursday, 04 June 2020 at 17:00, Richard Shaw wrote: > I'm trying to install Fedora 32 to a MS Surface GO which has some sort of > non-standard UEFI install. It refuses to boot anything but Windows from the > ESP partition even though I can see it using efibootmgr. Have you tried renaming your

Re: F30 security update submitted for stable "marked obsolete" instead of being pushed

2020-05-27 Thread Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
On Wednesday, 27 May 2020 at 10:22, Miro Hrončok wrote: > On 27. 05. 20 9:43, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote: > > On Wednesday, 27 May 2020 at 01:08, Miro Hrončok wrote: > > > On 27. 05. 20 0:56, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote: > > > > Can someone

Re: F30 security update submitted for stable "marked obsolete" instead of being pushed

2020-05-27 Thread Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
On Wednesday, 27 May 2020 at 01:08, Miro Hrončok wrote: > On 27. 05. 20 0:56, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote: > > Can someone explain why my update[1] which was submitted for F30 > > stable was not pushed but "marked obsolete"? It was a security > >

F30 security update submitted for stable "marked obsolete" instead of being pushed

2020-05-26 Thread Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
Can someone explain why my update[1] which was submitted for F30 stable was not pushed but "marked obsolete"? It was a security update, too. Regards, Dominik [1] https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-2d381e061b -- Fedora https://getfedora.org | RPM Fusion

Re: Self Introduction: Andrzej Bylicki (Andy Mender)

2020-05-19 Thread Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
Hello, Andy! On Monday, 18 May 2020 at 22:37, Andy Mender wrote: > Hello everyone! > > Introduction: > After reading the Fedora docs on packaging, I decided I would like to join > the Fedora project initially as a package maintainer/reviewer and perhaps > later as a source code committer. Here's

[EPEL-devel] Re: What to do about python 3.4 in EPEL7?

2020-05-07 Thread Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
On Thursday, 07 May 2020 at 05:07, Orion Poplawski wrote: > On 5/6/20 4:31 AM, Miro Hrončok wrote: > > On 06. 05. 20 3:39, Orion Poplawski wrote: > > > This is related to my breaking of various packages by dropping > > > python34-six. Should we: > > > > > > - re-add python34-six > > > > For now,

Re: Fedora 32 FTBFS packages to be orphaned in 1 week

2020-05-03 Thread Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
On Monday, 06 April 2020 at 13:22, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote: > On Monday, 06 April 2020 at 12:59, Miro Hrončok wrote: > [...] > > Orphaned: > > > pangox-compat > > I'll take it and try to fix it. It's required for the proprietary > Acrobat Reader for L

Re: WARNING: The pip package is not available, falling back to EasyInstall

2020-04-30 Thread Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
On Thursday, 30 April 2020 at 15:51, Luke Hinds wrote: > Hey All, > > Trying to update a package and getting failures over: > > ~~~ > > WARNING: The pip package is not available, falling back to EasyInstall for > handling setup_requires/test_requires; this is deprecated and will be > removed in

Re: Retired packages in Fedora are now disabled in bugzilla

2020-04-29 Thread Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
Hi! On Wednesday, 29 April 2020 at 19:14, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: > Good Morning Everyone, > > This is something that was asked a while ago and that we finally tackled. If a > package is retired in Fedora, it will now be "disabled" in bugzilla, meaning > no > one can open new bugs against it.

Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers (anaconda also affected)

2020-04-28 Thread Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
On Tuesday, 28 April 2020 at 22:15, Kevin Fenzi wrote: [...] > I'm a bit more concerned with keybinder3. That's needed by blueberry > which we use in the Xfce spin. I care about blueberry as well, even though I use MATE. > Leigh: You fixed the keybinder3 FTBFS, do you want to take ownership >

Re: What CPU extensions can we assume are available by arch?

2020-04-22 Thread Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
On Wednesday, 22 April 2020 at 16:51, Richard Shaw wrote: > On Wed, Apr 22, 2020 at 9:28 AM Artur Iwicki wrote: > > > Regarding x86_64 and AVX2, last year we had a very heated discussion about > > this on the mailing list. > > > > > >

[EPEL-devel] Re: Trying to find Sponsor to help me get Sensu Go into EPEL7/EPEL8

2020-04-20 Thread Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
Hello, Devin. Welcome to Fedora (EPEL)! On Monday, 20 April 2020 at 17:54, Devin Acosta wrote: > My name is Devin Acosta, I am a Red Hat Certified Architect, and I > have for the past about month now been trying to get Sensu Go (Open > Source Edition) into EPEL 7 / EPEL 8. I have joined the

Re: Unannounced SONAME bump: libxc.so.5 → libxc.so.9

2020-04-19 Thread Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
On Saturday, 18 April 2020 at 15:23, Fabio Valentini wrote: > On Sat, Apr 18, 2020 at 3:22 PM Fabio Valentini wrote: > > > > Hi everybody, > > > > The latest rawhide update of libxc (5.0.0) bumped the SONAME as > > mentioned in $SUBJECT. > > > > None of the depending packages have been rebuilt

Re: CPE Git Forge Decision

2020-04-06 Thread Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
On Monday, 06 April 2020 at 12:29, Leigh Griffin wrote: [...] > > Yes, this whole "decision" is in dictatorship relation to the > > community. > > > > Not following the standard procedures caused that I and probably > > many people in the community didn't pay much attention to it. > > We followed

Re: Fedora 32 FTBFS packages to be orphaned in 1 week

2020-04-06 Thread Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
On Monday, 06 April 2020 at 12:59, Miro Hrončok wrote: [...] > Orphaned: > pangox-compat I'll take it and try to fix it. It's required for the proprietary Acrobat Reader for Linux. And yes, I know the last version is from 2013 and full of security holes, but it's the only software that can read

Re: CPE Weekly: 2020-04-04

2020-04-06 Thread Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
On Monday, 06 April 2020 at 12:41, Leigh Griffin wrote: > On Sat, Apr 4, 2020 at 9:36 PM Randy Barlow > wrote: > > > On 4/4/20 3:02 PM, Aoife Moloney wrote: > > > However we do > > > recognize that it was still nonetheless a decision that was not made > > > in public, and for that we can only

Re: CPE Git Forge Decision

2020-04-06 Thread Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
On Wednesday, 01 April 2020 at 12:37, Miro Hrončok wrote: > On 01. 04. 20 10:53, Vít Ondruch wrote: > > Dne 01. 04. 20 v 10:37 Michal Konecny napsal(a): [...] > > > To be clear, you mean something like app above the dist-git where > > > you could do most of the things that are needed for dist-git

Re: unresponsive maintainer: itamarjp

2020-03-29 Thread Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
Hi, François. On Sunday, 29 March 2020 at 14:59, François Cami wrote: > Hi Itamar, > > I am starting the unresponsive maintainer process [0], because > packages you maintain or co-maintain are FTBFS [1]. > Your last build action in koji dates from early December 2019 [2]. > > Unfortunately, a

Re: Nvidia binary drivers fail to install on Fedora 32

2020-03-29 Thread Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
On Sunday, 29 March 2020 at 22:20, Ty Young wrote: > > On 3/29/20 3:04 PM, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote: > > On 29.03.2020 18:24, Kevin Kofler wrote: > > > RPM Fusion used to provide compiled kmod packages for years, and > > > those just worked. (Well, for the proprietary ones, they only > > >

[EPEL-devel] Re: RHEL8 package list

2020-03-29 Thread Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
On Sunday, 29 March 2020 at 15:59, Mattia Verga wrote: > Is there a way to get the package list and their version available in > RHEL8? For example, I would like to make kpmcore and > kde-partitionmanager available in EPEL8, but they require util-linux > >= 2.33.2. Since I can't find what version

Re: Code of Conduct issue

2020-03-24 Thread Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
John, On Tuesday, 24 March 2020 at 06:16, John M. Harris Jr wrote: [...] > Further, attempting to censor *this topic* is not in the spirit of the > Friends foundation either. It is important that we, as a community, > can discuss the rules we've chosen to govern our actions within this > project.

Re: Bugzilla signal/noise ratio

2020-03-23 Thread Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
On Monday, 23 March 2020 at 12:10, Daniel Pocock wrote: [...] > The bottom line is that these tools need to support our workflows, not > try to shoehorn us into a particular way of working. Just writing an e-mail about the issue to the Fedora devel list will not change anything, maybe apart from

Re: RFC: entering luks password on grub level for devices without keyboards

2020-03-19 Thread Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
On Thursday, 19 March 2020 at 19:59, Chris Murphy wrote: [...] > I think what you'd want for the stolen laptop use case is an encrypted > $BOOT, which GRUB does support: > > The first grub.cfg is unencrypted, and provides strictly for unlocking > a LUKS1 (no LUKS2 support yet) $BOOT volume, and

Re: F32 (gcc) compiler cannot create executables due to annobin

2020-03-14 Thread Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
On Saturday, 14 March 2020 at 22:51, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote: > Another build issue, this time in F32 buildroots (f32-candidate) only: > https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=42450608 > [...] > annobin: conftest.c: ICE: The size of the global_options s

F32 (gcc) compiler cannot create executables due to annobin

2020-03-14 Thread Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
Another build issue, this time in F32 buildroots (f32-candidate) only: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=42450608 [...] annobin: conftest.c: ICE: The size of the global_options structure has changed - please rebuild annobin annobin: conftest.c: ICE: Please contact the annobin

s390x build problem again (_rpm.error: error reading package header)

2020-03-14 Thread Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
My scratch builds are failing on s390x: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=42450592 https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=42450600 https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=42450608 with: _rpm.error: error reading package header Anyone else seeing this?

Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F31 to F32

2020-03-13 Thread Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
On Wednesday, 04 March 2020 at 17:23, Artur Iwicki wrote: > On my second machine: > > Problem with installed package mkvtoolnix-gui-41.0.0-1.fc31.x86_64 > - package mkvtoolnix-gui-41.0.0-2.fc32.x86_64 requires > libcmark.so.0.28.3()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed > -

Re: [Retired] gstreamer & gstreamer-plugins-base

2020-02-20 Thread Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
On Tuesday, 11 February 2020 at 17:53, Michael Catanzaro wrote: > On Tue, Feb 11, 2020 at 10:00 am, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski > wrote: > > It means that the fixes are available and can be applied to Fedora > > package if necessary. I'm still waiting for someone to point

Re: Self Introduction: Leonardo Rossetti

2020-02-19 Thread Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
Hello, Leo. On Tuesday, 18 February 2020 at 19:06, Leonardo Rossetti wrote: > Hello everyone, > > My name Leonardo (commonly called Leo), I am a software engineer from São > Paulo, Brazil. > > I've recently joined the community platform engineering team in Red Hat and > I wanted to go through

Re: Self Introduction: Chihurumnaya Ibiam

2020-02-19 Thread Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
Hello! On Thursday, 20 February 2020 at 00:20, Chihurumnaya Ibiam wrote: > Good day, > > I've been working mostly with python at Sugar Labs for some time now, > I'm yet to file a review request but I'm currently helping co-maintain > the sugar* packages; > I'm from Nigeria. > > I'm glad to be

Re: [Retired] gstreamer & gstreamer-plugins-base

2020-02-11 Thread Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
On Monday, 10 February 2020 at 15:56, Peter Robinson wrote: > > > > > > As long as it builds and functions, why remove it? > > > > > > > > > > Because it has lots of critical vulnerabilities and endangers > > > > > end-user devices. > > > > > > > > Please name a couple. Nobody has provided a

Re: [Retired] gstreamer & gstreamer-plugins-base

2020-02-10 Thread Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
On Monday, 10 February 2020 at 15:32, Peter Robinson wrote: > > On Monday, 10 February 2020 at 10:07, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote: > > > On 10.02.2020 09:43, John M. Harris Jr wrote: > > > > As long as it builds and functions, why remove it? > > > > > > Because it has lots of critical

Re: [Retired] gstreamer & gstreamer-plugins-base

2020-02-10 Thread Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
On Monday, 10 February 2020 at 10:07, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote: > On 10.02.2020 09:43, John M. Harris Jr wrote: > > As long as it builds and functions, why remove it? > > Because it has lots of critical vulnerabilities and endangers end-user > devices. Please name a couple. Nobody has

Re: [Retired] gstreamer & gstreamer-plugins-base

2020-01-31 Thread Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
On Friday, 31 January 2020 at 14:52, Michael Catanzaro wrote: > On Fri, Jan 31, 2020 at 2:47 pm, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski > wrote: > > I'm very well aware of the above, but I'm forced to use some proprietary > > software that is linked against gstreamer 0.10, so

Re: [Retired] gstreamer & gstreamer-plugins-base

2020-01-31 Thread Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
Hi, Tom. On Friday, 31 January 2020 at 14:37, Tom Callaway wrote: > Since I've moved my last dependent package off of this old stack, I've > retired gstreamer & gstreamer-plugins-base in rawhide (again). Hold on. I'll take these. > Before reviving these poor and tired packages, please consider

Re: gcc-10 Fortran argument mismatch issue

2020-01-21 Thread Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
Hi, Jeff. On Tuesday, 21 January 2020 at 21:16, Jeff Law wrote: > > > So this is another issue that's going to be seen with gcc-10. I'd been > hoping to get the time to fix packages correctly, but I think it's > ultimately going to have to fall to the package maintainers. > > gcc has

Re: Thank you for a way to requesting/merging side tags on demand.

2020-01-21 Thread Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
On Tuesday, 21 January 2020 at 09:53, Vít Ondruch wrote: > Hi everybody, > > I just like to thank everybody, who helped to have the possibility to > ask for side tag from fedpkg and allowed merging of the side tag via > Bodhi. This will make Rawhide much better place. > > I encourage everybody,

Re: How to obsolede module?

2020-01-14 Thread Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
On Tuesday, 14 January 2020 at 11:21, Josef Ridky wrote: > Hi folks, > > Does anyone know, how can I obsolete modular version of package? > > TL;DR > > I have one package (gimp) that is now available as RPM and Module at > the same time in Fedora. > Due of modular version makes issues to users

Re: Tox automation in packaging macros

2020-01-12 Thread Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
On Tuesday, 07 January 2020 at 14:32, Fabio Valentini wrote: > On Tue, Jan 7, 2020 at 2:18 PM Miro Hrončok wrote: > > > > On 07. 01. 20 14:06, Fabio Valentini wrote: > > > - python / pypi works great for %build and %install, but until testing > > > with tox is automated in packaging macros,

Re: Fedora Account Data Update mufti11

2020-01-03 Thread Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
On Friday, 03 January 2020 at 15:03, J. Scheurich wrote: > > > On 1/3/20 3:55 PM, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote: > > What does > > ssh -vvv muft...@pkgs.fedoraproject.org > > say? > $ ssh -vvv muft...@pkgs.fedoraproject.org [...] > debug1: Next authenti

Re: Fedora Account Data Update mufti11

2020-01-03 Thread Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
On Friday, 03 January 2020 at 14:28, J. Scheurich wrote: > > You might have to wait a bit until the changes have propagated. > > If it still doesn't work, make sure the .ssh/id_rsa file has mode 600, > > otherwise OpenSSH will give you errors. > Thanks, but it still do not work: > > $ ls -l

Re: peek package

2020-01-03 Thread Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
On Friday, 03 January 2020 at 11:14, Michael Schwendt wrote: > On Thu, 2 Jan 2020 13:07:40 +0100, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote: > > > On 02.01.2020 10:05, Benson Muite wrote: > > > I suspect there would be interest in having a royalty free version of > > > FFMPEG > > > > No, please, don't

Re: Updates impossible from iOS

2019-12-12 Thread Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
On Thursday, 12 December 2019 at 02:46, Richard Shaw wrote: > I tried to submit a new update for txt2man for EPEL 8. > > It was a PITA but I *THOUGHT* I got it correct. Now I see the wrong package > was included in the update. > > Problem 1: bodhi couldn't find the update so I tried to paste it

Re: Modularity: The Official Complaint Thread

2019-12-11 Thread Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
On Tuesday, 10 December 2019 at 13:38, Miro Hrončok wrote: > On 05. 11. 19 21:17, Stephen Gallagher wrote: > > I'm sure there are other pain points and I encourage you to share > > them. Please adhere to the guidelines about objectively measurable > > issues, though. > > M5. Modular packages are

Re: Heads up: rdma-core dropped support for 32-bit arm

2019-12-10 Thread Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
On Tuesday, 10 December 2019 at 11:14, Honggang LI wrote: > On Mon, Dec 09, 2019 at 02:40:29PM +0100, Dominik 'Rathann' > Mierzejewski wrote: [...] > > Thanks for the background. I'm not questioning your decision to stop > > building rdma for armv7hl, but it needs

Re: Heads up: rdma-core dropped support for 32-bit arm

2019-12-10 Thread Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
On Tuesday, 10 December 2019 at 10:47, Honggang LI wrote: [...] > I will work with Mellanox to fix this dependency issue. Thank you! Regards, Dominik -- Fedora https://getfedora.org | RPM Fusion http://rpmfusion.org There should be a science of discontent. People need hard times and

Re: Heads up: rdma-core dropped support for 32-bit arm

2019-12-09 Thread Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
On Monday, 09 December 2019 at 14:15, Honggang LI wrote: > On Mon, Dec 09, 2019 at 12:17:43PM +0100, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski > wrote: [...] > > The change to rdma-core.spec in commit > > b631ce466538bdee6e19be3286fb8cbeb5c73de6: > > ... > > +# 32-bit arm is

Re: Heads up: rdma-core dropped support for 32-bit arm

2019-12-09 Thread Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
On Sunday, 08 December 2019 at 04:36, Doug Ledford wrote: > > On Dec 7, 2019, at 1:04 AM, Orion Poplawski wrote: > > > > FYI: > > > > rdma-core 26.1-1.fc32 dropped support for %arm: > > > > # 32-bit arm is missing required arch-specific memory barriers, > > ExcludeArch: %{arm} > > > > This

Fedora mirror selection (was: Allow comments and discussion even though an update was pushed) to stable

2019-12-06 Thread Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
On Friday, 06 December 2019 at 10:57, Petr Pisar wrote: [...] > Maybe DNF could support setting a prefered mirror while still checking > for the latest metadata because in my experience the automatic mirror > selection does not always provide the best performance. (E.g. when > I connected an IPv6

Re: Provisional pyproject RPM macros: Dynamic BuildRequires for Python packages

2019-12-01 Thread Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
On Sunday, 01 December 2019 at 00:07, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > On Sat, Nov 30, 2019 at 05:26:14PM +0100, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski > wrote: [...] > > Two observations: > > > > 1. It actually generates more BRs than I specify manually (I had 3). I

Re: Provisional pyproject RPM macros: Dynamic BuildRequires for Python packages

2019-11-30 Thread Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
Hi, Miro. On Friday, 04 October 2019 at 13:50, Miro Hrončok wrote: > Hello fellow Python packagers. This is an announcement about a new set > of RPM macros you can use to build PEP 517/518 enabled packages, that > is Python packages that have the pyproject.toml file. Thanks for your (and whoever

bugs for non-EOL releases are being closed as EOL by a script

2019-11-27 Thread Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
On Wednesday, 27 November 2019 at 15:22, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1774713#c13 Not only reviews: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1777310 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1763148 Ben, stop the script and fix it, please.

Re: [Scitech] OpenMPI stack in danger (Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers)

2019-11-25 Thread Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
On Monday, 25 November 2019 at 12:45, Ankur Sinha wrote: > On Mon, Nov 25, 2019 11:38:42 +0100, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote: > > Hi! > > > > > > > > To save time looking this up, I want to direct the attention of pmix and > > openmpi maintaine

OpenMPI stack in danger (Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers)

2019-11-25 Thread Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
Hi! On Monday, 25 November 2019 at 10:52, Miro Hrončok wrote: > The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they > are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure > that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper reason: >

Re: gstreamer-plugins-base revival

2019-11-22 Thread Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
On Thursday, 21 November 2019 at 17:17, Michael Catanzaro wrote: > > Please don't revive ancient, unmaintained, security-critical libraries for > use with proprietary software not distributed by Fedora Well, it's useful at least for two other people and I don't see any CVE bugs open against

Re: gstreamer-plugins-base revival

2019-11-21 Thread Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
On Thursday, 21 November 2019 at 13:41, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote: > Hi, > > On Thursday, 22 August 2019 at 15:04, Tom Callaway wrote: > > I'm hoping that this one hasn't been dead for 8 weeks, because all it needs > > to get it building again is to disable t

Re: gstreamer-plugins-base revival

2019-11-21 Thread Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
On Wednesday, 25 September 2019 at 10:45, Kalev Lember wrote: > > On 9/24/19 14:50, Michael Catanzaro wrote: > > On Thu, Aug 22, 2019 at 9:04 am, Tom Callaway wrote: > > > or know of some reason it shouldn't be brought back > > > > Well this looks like gstreamer 0.10. I'm really surprised we

Re: gstreamer-plugins-base revival

2019-11-21 Thread Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
Hi, On Thursday, 22 August 2019 at 15:04, Tom Callaway wrote: > I'm hoping that this one hasn't been dead for 8 weeks, because all it needs > to get it building again is to disable the gtk-doc generation... > > I don't really want to own it, but I have dependent packages, so if no one > else

  1   2   3   4   5   6   >