Re: [ELN] gcc is going to be updated to gcc11 in the ELN buildroot ahead of Rawhide

2020-10-23 Thread Fabio Valentini
On Thu, Oct 22, 2020 at 2:27 PM Aleksandra Fedorova wrote: > > Hi, all, > > this is the informational message, no action required. > > Upon agreement between gcc maintainers and ELN SIG we would like to > switch ELN buildroot to use GCC11 ahead of Fedora Rawhide. > > Though ELN is defined as the

Summary/Minutes from today's FESCo Meeting (2020-10-21)

2020-10-21 Thread Fabio Valentini
= #fedora-meeting-2: FESCo (2020-10-21) = Meeting started by decathorpe at 14:00:31 UTC. The full logs are available at https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-2/2020-10-21/fesco.2020-10-21-14.00.log.html Meeting

Re: glibc troubles in rawhide?

2020-10-21 Thread Fabio Valentini
On Wed, Oct 21, 2020, 09:36 Florian Weimer wrote: > * Fabio Valentini: > > >> I'm pretty sure this is the result of *not* updating glibc. Did you > >> attempt a partial upgrade of rawhide, restricting the package set > during > >> an update? > >>

Re: glibc troubles in rawhide?

2020-10-21 Thread Fabio Valentini
On Wed, Oct 21, 2020, 07:03 Florian Weimer wrote: > * Fabio Valentini: > > > Looks like the most recent glibc update in rawhide broke some stuff, > > including running dnf: > > > > Traceback (most recent call last): > > File "/usr/bin/dnf",

Re: Has glibc just removed some symbols?

2020-10-20 Thread Fabio Valentini
On Tue, Oct 20, 2020 at 4:06 PM Jerry James wrote: > > See https://koschei.fedoraproject.org/package/ocaml-dune?collection=f34 > > OCaml package builds are suddenly failing because the symbols > __xstat64, __fxstat64, and __lxstat64 cannot be found, maybe due to > this change: > > - linux: Move

glibc troubles in rawhide?

2020-10-20 Thread Fabio Valentini
Hi everybody, Looks like the most recent glibc update in rawhide broke some stuff, including running dnf: Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/bin/dnf", line 57, in from dnf.cli import main File "/usr/lib/python3.9/site-packages/dnf/__init__.py", line 30, in import

Schedule for Wednesday's FESCo Meeting (2020-10-21)

2020-10-20 Thread Fabio Valentini
Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FESCo meeting Wednesday at 14:00UTC in #fedora-meeting-2 on irc.freenode.net. To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/UTCHowto or run: date -d '2020-10-21 14:00 UTC' Links to all issues to

Schedule for Wednesday's FESCo Meeting (2020-10-14) + Proposal to Cancel

2020-10-13 Thread Fabio Valentini
Since there are no open tickets that are tagged with "meeting" and no new tickets are in need of synchronous discussion IMO, I propose to cancel tomorrow's meeting, and would chair next week's meeting instead. The usual (empty) schedule and announcements are listed below. - Fabio --- Following

License change: rust-tinyvec(0.3): zlib -> zlib or ASL 2.0 or MIT

2020-10-13 Thread Fabio Valentini
Hi everybody, As of tinyvec versions 0.3.4 / 1.0.0, the crate was re-licensed from "Zlib" to "Zlib OR Apache-2.0 OR MIT" to better align its license with the broader Rust ecosystem (which mostly uses "Apache-2.0 OR MIT" and packages that depend on it. Since this is a less restrictive set of

Re: F33 beta: where are my Rust packages?

2020-10-12 Thread Fabio Valentini
On Mon, Oct 12, 2020 at 9:15 AM Artur Frenszek-Iwicki wrote: > > I wrote to Igor a week ago, but it seems he's away currently, as I didn't get > an answer yet. > > Do you know of some document that describes how to "go through Igor's whole > weird rust side tag build procedure"? Or, if it's not

Re: CPE Weekly: 2020-09-20

2020-10-12 Thread Fabio Valentini
On Sun, Sep 20, 2020 at 10:33 PM Aoife Moloney wrote: > GitLab > Thank you so much to everyone for adding your questions to the doc for > the GitLab AMA session on Thursday 10th September, and for your > attendance on the day during the call. > Here is the full AMA transcript >

Re: bodhi updates stuck in "pending" state

2020-10-11 Thread Fabio Valentini
On Mon, Oct 12, 2020 at 1:04 AM Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > On Sun, Oct 11, 2020 at 11:03:56PM +0200, Fabio Valentini wrote: > > Hi everybody, > > > > To me, it looks like some recent bodhi updates are stuck in "pending" > > unintentionally. This might be the re

Re: bodhi updates stuck in "pending" state

2020-10-11 Thread Fabio Valentini
On Sun, Oct 11, 2020 at 11:46 PM Richard Shaw wrote: > > On Sun, Oct 11, 2020 at 4:04 PM Fabio Valentini wrote: >> >> Hi everybody, >> >> To me, it looks like some recent bodhi updates are stuck in "pending" >> unintentionally. This might be the re

bodhi updates stuck in "pending" state

2020-10-11 Thread Fabio Valentini
Hi everybody, To me, it looks like some recent bodhi updates are stuck in "pending" unintentionally. This might be the result of a bodhi bug that let release branch updates created from side tags sit in "pending" without ever going into "testing" state without manually prodding them. This affects

Re: Package downgrades from fedora 32 -> fedora 33 (updated + annotated list inside)

2020-10-06 Thread Fabio Valentini
On Tue, Oct 6, 2020 at 1:54 PM Ankur Sinha wrote: > > On Tue, Oct 06, 2020 13:48:34 +0200, Fabio Valentini wrote: > > > > With the impending final freeze for f33, should I open bugs for the > > packages with missing f33 builds and / or updates, so things can at >

Re: Package downgrades from fedora 32 -> fedora 33 (updated + annotated list inside)

2020-10-06 Thread Fabio Valentini
On Sat, Oct 3, 2020 at 12:53 AM Fabio Valentini wrote: > > Hi everybody, > > I've compiled an updated list of package downgrades when comparing > fedora 32 to fedora 33. Note that a lot of packages were either not > built for f33 at all (packagers missing the branch point?),

Orphaned poetry and some of its dependencies

2020-10-05 Thread Fabio Valentini
Hi everybody, I've decided to orphan poetry and some of its python dependencies. I don't actually use those packages myself (I've seen the light and switched to Rust for my own projects), and maintaining them has become a major headache with the upstream projects being very "special". Some of

Package downgrades from fedora 32 -> fedora 33 (updated + annotated list inside)

2020-10-02 Thread Fabio Valentini
Hi everybody, I've compiled an updated list of package downgrades when comparing fedora 32 to fedora 33. Note that a lot of packages were either not built for f33 at all (packagers missing the branch point?), or had no bodhi update created for updates (packagers missing the bodhi activation

Re: Proven packager help needed to merge libevent 2.1.12 side tag

2020-10-01 Thread Fabio Valentini
On Thu, Oct 1, 2020 at 11:37 AM Ondřej Lysoněk wrote: > > Fabio Valentini writes: > > > On Thu, Oct 1, 2020 at 10:27 AM Ondřej Lysoněk wrote: > >> > >> Hi, > >> > >> So all the required rebuilds for the libevent 2.1.12 rebase should be > >

Re: Proven packager help needed to merge libevent 2.1.12 side tag

2020-10-01 Thread Fabio Valentini
On Thu, Oct 1, 2020 at 10:39 AM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > > On Thu, Oct 01, 2020 at 10:32:44AM +0200, Fabio Valentini wrote: > > On Thu, Oct 1, 2020 at 10:27 AM Ondřej Lysoněk wrote: > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > So all the require

Re: Proven packager help needed to merge libevent 2.1.12 side tag

2020-10-01 Thread Fabio Valentini
On Thu, Oct 1, 2020 at 10:27 AM Ondřej Lysoněk wrote: > > Hi, > > So all the required rebuilds for the libevent 2.1.12 rebase should be > done now in the side tag. I've tried to merge the side tag by creating > an update in Bodhi as described in [1], but Bodhi tells me 'olysonek > does not have

Re: Packages in rawhide not showing in src.fedoraproject.org

2020-09-30 Thread Fabio Valentini
On Wed, Sep 30, 2020 at 12:55 PM José Abílio Matos wrote: > > Hi, > > I am sorry if this has been discussed before but I do not remember it. > > > The culprit to this message was the review of R-pak > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1883047 > > > While running fedora-review that

Re: F33 beta: where are my Rust packages?

2020-09-30 Thread Fabio Valentini
On Wed, Sep 30, 2020 at 11:43 AM Petr Pisar wrote: > > On Tue, Sep 29, 2020 at 09:56:22PM -, Artur Frenszek-Iwicki wrote: > > I maintain two Rust packages, rust-copydeps [1] and rust-desed [2]. Both > > were built for F33 ([3], [4]) before it branched off for Rawhide (and > > submitted to

rust-bytemuck license change: zlib -> zlib or ASL 2.0 or MIT

2020-09-24 Thread Fabio Valentini
The subject says it all ... with the update to rust-bytemuck 1.4.1, the license changed from zlib only to zlib OR ASL 2.0 OR MIT. Since this is less restrictive (and matches the rest of the Rust ecosystem better), this is a good thing TM I guess :) Fabio

Re: F34 Change Proposal: Rust Crate Packages For Release Branches (System-Wide Change)

2020-09-24 Thread Fabio Valentini
On Thu, Sep 24, 2020 at 11:51 AM Luca BRUNO wrote: > > On Mon, 14 Sep 2020 10:10:30 -0400 > Ben Cotton wrote: > > > Following the general upwards trend in the Rust language's popularity, > > more and more applications and services in fedora are written in Rust. > > This includes some CoreOS

Easy Review Swaps For New Packages That Block Rust Stack Updates

2020-09-24 Thread Fabio Valentini
Hi everybody, I've been working through open bugs in the Rust stack for the past week, trying to contribute a few package updates. Some are, however, blocked by new dependencies that aren't packaged yet. These new packages are *very simple* and 99% automatically generated, so the reviews should

rust-copyless license change: MPLv2 -> MIT or ASL 2.0

2020-09-19 Thread Fabio Valentini
$subject basically says it all. The copyless crate changed its license from MPL-2.0 to (MIT OR Apache-2.0) with the 0.1.5 release. I expect this to have no ill effects in fedora, since the new license terms are more liberal and (MIT OR Apache-2.0) is actually the de-facto standard license in the

Re: maybe a path forward for java and modules? [was Re: The Future of the Java Stack (also regarding ELN and RHEL)]

2020-09-19 Thread Fabio Valentini
On Fri, Sep 18, 2020 at 5:30 PM David Cantrell wrote: > > On Thu, Sep 17, 2020 at 12:51:46PM -0400, Matthew Miller wrote: > >On Fri, Sep 11, 2020 at 11:01:00AM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > >> If one of the issues here can be stated as "we want buildroot-only > >> packages because we don't want

Re: F34 Change Proposal: Rust Crate Packages For Release Branches (System-Wide Change)

2020-09-14 Thread Fabio Valentini
On Mon, Sep 14, 2020 at 9:02 PM Josh Stone wrote: > > On 9/14/20 11:40 AM, Fabio Valentini wrote: > > I agree. The only thing to keep in mind for semver-incompatible -devel > > package updates is to check dependent packages, and either patch them > > to use the new

Re: F34 Change Proposal: Rust Crate Packages For Release Branches (System-Wide Change)

2020-09-14 Thread Fabio Valentini
On Mon, Sep 14, 2020 at 8:38 PM Neal Gompa wrote: > > On Mon, Sep 14, 2020 at 2:34 PM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek > wrote: > > > > On Mon, Sep 14, 2020 at 10:10:30AM -0400, Ben Cotton wrote: > > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Rust_Crate_Packages_For_Release_Branches > > > > > > ==

Re: The Future of the Java Stack (also regarding ELN and RHEL)

2020-09-14 Thread Fabio Valentini
On Fri, Sep 11, 2020 at 10:04 PM Hans de Goede wrote: > > Hi, > > On 9/11/20 6:08 PM, Fabio Valentini wrote: > > I can try to come up with a list of often-used-but-simple-to-maintain > > Java packages? > > Yes that sounds great. I would be happy to pick up a few of

Re: Proposing an EPEL packaging SIG

2020-09-14 Thread Fabio Valentini
On Mon, Sep 14, 2020, 10:35 Vít Ondruch wrote: > > Dne 14. 09. 20 v 10:11 Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek napsal(a): > > On Mon, Sep 14, 2020 at 09:50:45AM +0200, Vít Ondruch wrote: > >> Reading this proposal and with the EPEL8 experience, where there was not > >> even wiki page, where I could state

Re: The Future of the Java Stack (also regarding ELN and RHEL)

2020-09-12 Thread Fabio Valentini
On Sat, Sep 12, 2020 at 11:05 AM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > > On Sat, Sep 12, 2020 at 10:32:51AM +0200, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote: > > On 11.09.2020 18:42, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > > > I'm not enthusiastic about build-time-only packages, but if the choice > > > is

Re: Modules without packaged non-modular versions (Was Re: The Future of the Java Stack (also regarding ELN and RHEL))

2020-09-11 Thread Fabio Valentini
On Fri, Sep 11, 2020 at 10:56 PM Jie Kang wrote: > > On Thu, Sep 10, 2020 at 11:10 AM Miro Hrončok wrote: > > > > On 10. 09. 20 16:53, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote: > > > I think FESCo should completely forbid modules without packaged > > > non-modular versions. > > > > It did. > > Hi, > > Can

Re: What is the status of this F33 update?

2020-09-11 Thread Fabio Valentini
On Fri, Sep 11, 2020 at 9:38 PM Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > > https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-3f6760cc65 > > I'm confused about what state this update it is. "Pending" - pending > what exactly? What we really want to know is how long before it ends > up in F33 and Jerry

Re: The Future of the Java Stack (also regarding ELN and RHEL)

2020-09-11 Thread Fabio Valentini
On Fri, Sep 11, 2020 at 1:06 PM Hans de Goede wrote: > > Hi, > > On 9/11/20 12:47 PM, Vít Ondruch wrote: > > > > Dne 11. 09. 20 v 11:03 Hans de Goede napsal(a): > >> > >> > >> On 9/11/20 10:16 AM, Mikolaj Izdebski wrote: > >> > >>> Another, more concrete example: core Ant doesn't have any

Re: The Future of the Java Stack (also regarding ELN and RHEL)

2020-09-11 Thread Fabio Valentini
On Fri, Sep 11, 2020 at 5:52 PM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > > On Fri, Sep 11, 2020 at 11:03:39AM +0200, Hans de Goede wrote: > > An other more generic approach which has been brought up once or > > twice, but which not really has been discussed in much detail yet > > I believe is

Re: The Future of the Java Stack (also regarding ELN and RHEL)

2020-09-10 Thread Fabio Valentini
On Thu, Sep 10, 2020 at 4:23 PM Mikolaj Izdebski wrote: > > On Thu, Sep 10, 2020 at 3:29 PM Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski > wrote: > > > > On Thursday, 10 September 2020 at 14:50, Joe Orton wrote: > > [...] > > > 1. The team has two missions in Fedora: > > > > > > a) We deliver, maintain and

Re: The Future of the Java Stack (also regarding ELN and RHEL)

2020-09-09 Thread Fabio Valentini
On Thu, Sep 10, 2020 at 12:43 AM Alexander Scheel wrote: > > On Wed, Sep 9, 2020 at 6:27 PM Jerry James wrote: (snip) > > For those who are willing to help out, is > > https://pagure.io/java-maint-sig/issues the place to go to figure out > > what needs to be done? Is there any kind of TODO

The Future of the Java Stack (also regarding ELN and RHEL)

2020-09-08 Thread Fabio Valentini
Hi everybody, So, after some recent FESCo decisions (no default module streams in fedora, new Module Policy for fedora and ELN modules), it's time to ask this question again: What's the future of the Java Stack in fedora, and by extension, in ELN (and possibly RHEL)? For the past ~18 months,

Re: noarch packages only for some architecture composes

2020-09-07 Thread Fabio Valentini
On Mon, Sep 7, 2020 at 1:02 PM Florian Weimer wrote: > > Is it possible to include a noarch package only in some of the composes? > > The background is that I added glibc-headers-x86.noarch to deal with a > conflict between inconsistent composes (glibc-headers.i686 was sometimes > in the x86_64

Re: Can a bugzilla issue be locked because of spam?

2020-08-31 Thread Fabio Valentini
On Mon, Aug 31, 2020 at 4:51 AM Christopher wrote: > > This old issue (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1177202) > keeps receiving spam every couple of weeks from a different account. > I've been trying to flag the spam comments as spam, and remove the > flags they keep setting, and

Re: %lua_requires behaves differently in F33+

2020-08-30 Thread Fabio Valentini
On Sun, Aug 30, 2020 at 11:04 AM Miro Hrončok wrote: > > On 30. 08. 20 4:07, Michel Alexandre Salim wrote: > > Quick question: for Python there's both python-devel and python-sig -- > > this seems overkill for Lua, right? Would starting lua@lists be enough? > > Not only it is overkill, but it

Re: fedora-review fails with "warning: line 16: Possible unexpanded macro in: Requires .."

2020-08-28 Thread Fabio Valentini
On Fri, Aug 28, 2020 at 10:44 PM Sérgio Basto wrote: > > On Fri, 2020-08-28 at 15:03 +, Martin Gansser wrote: > > ok, I'll try again tomorrow or the day after tomorrow when it's > > available in Rawhide. > > you may build it with koji package if you add enabled=1 in [local] > configuration

Re: Suspicious downgrades when upgrading from F32 to F33: containers-common, fuse-overlayfs, strace, thunderbird

2020-08-26 Thread Fabio Valentini
On Wed, Aug 26, 2020 at 7:11 PM kevin wrote: > > On Wed, Aug 26, 2020 at 11:45:48AM +0200, Fabio Valentini wrote: > > On Tue, Aug 25, 2020 at 9:33 PM kevin wrote: > > > > > > On Tue, Aug 25, 2020 at 08:14:38PM +0200, Fabio Valentini wrote: > > > > Do

Package downgrades from f32 -> f33 (categorized list inside)

2020-08-26 Thread Fabio Valentini
Following up on the recent discussion, I've checked repository contents of f32 and f33 for downgrades and categorized them. I also dropped packages with F33FTBFS issues from the list since for these the reason for the downgrade is already documented as a bug. # Koji tagging / compose issues?

Re: Suspicious downgrades when upgrading from F32 to F33: containers-common, fuse-overlayfs, strace, thunderbird

2020-08-26 Thread Fabio Valentini
On Tue, Aug 25, 2020 at 9:33 PM kevin wrote: > > On Tue, Aug 25, 2020 at 08:14:38PM +0200, Fabio Valentini wrote: > > Do you think it would be a good idea to file bugs for those packages > > where a build for f33 was "forgotten"? > > Since I already have the &

Re: New version of net-snmp + soname bump

2020-08-26 Thread Fabio Valentini
On Wed, Aug 26, 2020 at 11:15 AM Josef Ridky wrote: > > Hi folks, > > upstream authors has released new major version of net-snmp that is now > heading to Rawhide and F33. > As part of this update, soname will change from .35 to .40. > > I would like to ask all maintainers, that rely on some

Re: Suspicious downgrades when upgrading from F32 to F33: containers-common, fuse-overlayfs, strace, thunderbird

2020-08-25 Thread Fabio Valentini
On Tue, Aug 25, 2020 at 3:13 PM Peter Robinson wrote: > > On Tue, Aug 25, 2020 at 1:32 PM Daniel Walsh wrote: > > > > On 8/24/20 07:00, Miro Hrončok wrote: > > > Hello. > > > > > > The following packages are downgrades when I attempt upgrade from > > > Fedora 32 to Fedora 33: > > > > > > -

Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers

2020-08-25 Thread Fabio Valentini
On Tue, Aug 25, 2020, 10:45 Miro Hrončok wrote: > On 25. 08. 20 5:52, Michel Alexandre Salim wrote: > > I'll properly retire lua-logging and luadoc, but keep lua-sql. > > Let's merge the retirement commits to f33 as well? > Doesn't "fedpkg retire" do more than just push something to git, e.g.

Re: Suspicious downgrades when upgrading from F32 to F33: containers-common, fuse-overlayfs, strace, thunderbird

2020-08-24 Thread Fabio Valentini
On Mon, Aug 24, 2020 at 3:04 PM Neal Gompa wrote: > No, something is definitely wrong, because last night's F33 compose > also had the same problem. I literally released that to attempt to fix > image builds yesterday and it wasn't even used. Oh. Yeah then something is *definitely* wrong with

Re: Suspicious downgrades when upgrading from F32 to F33: containers-common, fuse-overlayfs, strace, thunderbird

2020-08-24 Thread Fabio Valentini
On Mon, Aug 24, 2020 at 2:45 PM Neal Gompa wrote: > > On Mon, Aug 24, 2020 at 8:42 AM Fabio Valentini wrote: > > > [...] > > - appliance-tools is newer in 32 than in 33: > > 0:010.1-1.fc32 > 0:010.0-3.fc33 > > Something is wrong here, as Bodhi automaticall

Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers

2020-08-24 Thread Fabio Valentini
On Mon, Aug 24, 2020 at 12:26 PM Miro Hrončok wrote: > geronimo-parent-poms jjelen, mizdebsk, orphan 0 weeks ago > glassfish-legal orphan 0 weeks ago > glassfish-master-pom orphan 0 weeks ago

Re: Suspicious downgrades when upgrading from F32 to F33: containers-common, fuse-overlayfs, strace, thunderbird

2020-08-24 Thread Fabio Valentini
On Mon, Aug 24, 2020 at 1:01 PM Miro Hrončok wrote: > > Hello. > > The following packages are downgrades when I attempt upgrade from Fedora 32 to > Fedora 33: > > - containers-common (skopeo) 1:1.1.1 -> 1:1.0.1 > - fuse-overlayfs 1.1.2 -> 1.1.0 > - strace 5.8 -> 5.7.0.6.7ab6 > - thunderbird

Re: fedora-review fails due to no annobin in mock

2020-08-21 Thread Fabio Valentini
On Fri, Aug 21, 2020 at 11:15 AM Artur Iwicki wrote: > > Today I tried reviewing some Python packages: > - x-tile: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1861020 > - python-iptools: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1870907 > > And the mock build done by fedora-review failed. The

Re: Fedpkg import fails

2020-08-20 Thread Fabio Valentini
On Tue, Aug 18, 2020 at 7:09 AM Vijayan, Arunprabhu wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I find when I try fedpkg scratch build or import, it is very slow & I’m not > able to upload the package. > > > > fedpkg build --scratch --target rawhide --srpm SRPMS/ > > fedpkg import /path/to/srpm/from/step/1a > > I’ve

Re: fedora-review fails due to no annobin in mock

2020-08-20 Thread Fabio Valentini
On Thu, Aug 20, 2020 at 1:43 AM Artur Iwicki wrote: > > I had this issue a month ago when reviewing sane-airscan: > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1859207 > Also a week later, when reviewing wev: > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1860772 > And today, when I tried to

Re: Strange issue with mock and rawhide

2020-08-19 Thread Fabio Valentini
On Wed, Aug 19, 2020 at 10:44 PM Steven A. Falco wrote: > > I'm getting a failure to detect wxGTK3-devel in a cmake project that I am > building via mock. This has worked fine in the past, but suddenly it is no > longer working. > > My host system is fedora-32 x86_64, and I'm trying to build

Re: Fedora 33 compose report: 20200818.n.0 changes

2020-08-18 Thread Fabio Valentini
On Tue, Aug 18, 2020 at 5:30 PM Miro Hrončok wrote: > > On 18. 08. 20 16:35, Jerry James wrote: > >> Package: slirp4netns-1.1.4-1.fc33 > >> Old package: slirp4netns-1.1.4-4.dev.giteecccdb.fc33 > >> Summary: slirp for network namespaces > >> RPMs: slirp4netns > >> Size:

Re: Fedora official kernel build fails to compile on Copr

2020-08-18 Thread Fabio Valentini
On Tue, Aug 18, 2020, 02:15 Laura Abbott wrote: > On 8/17/20 7:36 PM, Germano Massullo wrote: > > Hi there, I would need help in understanding why this kernel build > failed. > > > > > https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/germano/kernel_204253_comment_14_patch/build/1613735/ > > > > The SRPM

Re: failed to do fedpkg import

2020-08-17 Thread Fabio Valentini
On Mon, Aug 17, 2020 at 11:54 AM Vít Ondruch wrote: > > > Dne 16. 08. 20 v 15:53 Fabio Valentini napsal(a): > > > Also I'm not sure why you're running import again, when the package already > exists. > > > `import` is the best way how to upload sources + add/remo

Re: Strange Java package build failures (Error in scriptlet ?)

2020-08-17 Thread Fabio Valentini
On Mon, Aug 17, 2020 at 7:14 AM Ondrej Dubaj wrote: > Experiencing the same problem. Haven;t found any usefull info about this We have since identified the root cause of this problem: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1869030 If you're doing local mock builds, you can work around the

Buildroot overrides in branched pre updates-testing activation?

2020-08-16 Thread Fabio Valentini
Hi everybody, I've just noticed that bodhi allows users to create buildroot overrides for F33 for no good reason (updates-testing is not even active yet and updates to to stable directly). There's 41 (!) active overrides for F33: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/overrides/?search==False=F33

Re: failed to do fedpkg import

2020-08-16 Thread Fabio Valentini
On Sun, Aug 16, 2020, 15:49 J. Scheuirich wrote: > $ fedpkg co wdune > Cloning into 'wdune'... > remote: Enumerating objects: 4992, done. > remote: Counting objects: 100% (4992/4992), done. > remote: Compressing objects: 100% (3647/3647), done. > remote: Total 4992 (delta 1323), reused 4900

Re: Strange build failures in rawhide buildroot (cont'd) - glibc 2.33 dev snapshot?

2020-08-16 Thread Fabio Valentini
On Sat, Aug 15, 2020 at 8:52 PM Chris Murphy wrote: > > On Sat, Aug 15, 2020 at 9:47 AM Fabio Valentini wrote: > > > > On Sat, Aug 15, 2020 at 5:30 PM Paul Howarth wrote: > > > > > > On Sat, 15 Aug 2020 16:28:47 +0200 > > > Fabio Valentini wrote: &g

Re: Strange build failures in rawhide buildroot (cont'd) - glibc 2.33 dev snapshot?

2020-08-15 Thread Fabio Valentini
On Sat, Aug 15, 2020 at 5:30 PM Paul Howarth wrote: > > On Sat, 15 Aug 2020 16:28:47 +0200 > Fabio Valentini wrote: > > - autoreconf fails because %build needs a newer shell (protobuf): > > > > /usr/bin/autoconf: This script requires a shell more modern than all > &

Re: Strange build failures in rawhide buildroot (cont'd) - glibc 2.33 dev snapshot?

2020-08-15 Thread Fabio Valentini
On Fri, Aug 14, 2020 at 10:00 PM Jerry James wrote: > > On Fri, Aug 14, 2020 at 1:29 PM Jerry James wrote: > > I added "exit 1" to the end of %install in one of the affected OCaml > > packages, so that I could inspect the contents of > > /builddir/build/BUILDROOT in the mock chroot. The files

Re: Strange build failures in rawhide buildroot (cont'd) - glibc 2.33 dev snapshot?

2020-08-14 Thread Fabio Valentini
On Sat, Aug 15, 2020 at 12:37 AM Sérgio Basto wrote: > > On Fri, 2020-08-14 at 21:14 +0200, Fabio Valentini wrote: > > On Fri, Aug 14, 2020 at 8:48 PM Sérgio Basto > > wrote: > > > On Fri, 2020-08-14 at 20:30 +0200, Fabio Valentini wrote: > > > > So, I've

Re: Non-responsive maintainer check for bochecha

2020-08-14 Thread Fabio Valentini
On Sat, Aug 15, 2020 at 12:20 AM Neal Gompa wrote: > > On Fri, Aug 14, 2020 at 6:03 PM Michael Catanzaro > wrote: > > > > > > Hi, > > > > I believe Mathieu is temporarily unavailable. If you don't hear back > > soon, it makes sense to proceed with nonresponsive maintainer procedure > > if you

Re: Strange build failures in rawhide buildroot (cont'd) - glibc 2.33 dev snapshot?

2020-08-14 Thread Fabio Valentini
On Fri, Aug 14, 2020 at 8:48 PM Sérgio Basto wrote: > > On Fri, 2020-08-14 at 20:30 +0200, Fabio Valentini wrote: > > So, I've been trying to figure out strange build failures in my Java > > packages when running mock with `--enablerepo local`. > > > > First I though

Strange build failures in rawhide buildroot (cont'd) - glibc 2.33 dev snapshot?

2020-08-14 Thread Fabio Valentini
So, I've been trying to figure out strange build failures in my Java packages when running mock with `--enablerepo local`. First I thought java-11-openjdk update might be to blame, but now I found another "unrelated" issue: OCaml packages built with dune and `--enablerepo local` right now

Strange Java package build failures (Error in scriptlet ?)

2020-08-14 Thread Fabio Valentini
Hi everybody, Since ~2 days ago, the rawhide koji buildroot has exhibited some *really weird* issues when building Java packages with maven (when building packages locally with "mock -r fedora-rawhide-x86_64 --enablerepo local foo.src.rpm"). During installation of the build dependencies, some

Re: Non-responsive maintainer check: spike

2020-08-14 Thread Fabio Valentini
On Fri, Aug 14, 2020 at 4:52 PM spike wrote: > > Hi Fabio, > > Contacting me should be somewhat straight forward through the email address > associated with my user id in FAS or through IRC. Let me know how I can help. > > Cheers We have resolved this issue on bugzilla:

Re: Unannounced soname bump: libreport

2020-08-14 Thread Fabio Valentini
On Fri, Aug 14, 2020 at 5:01 PM Michael Schwendt wrote: > > On Fri, 14 Aug 2020 16:37:28 +0200, Fabio Valentini wrote: > > > > As a side note, the update now has arch specific BuildRequires, so the > > > SRPM > > > cannot be rebuilt on anything but . > >

Re: Unannounced soname bump: libreport

2020-08-14 Thread Fabio Valentini
On Fri, Aug 14, 2020 at 4:32 PM Miro Hrončok wrote: > > On 14. 08. 20 2:10, Adam Williamson wrote: > > A new build of libreport was done for all releases today by mfabik: > > > > https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=1592551 > >

Non-responsive maintainer check: spike

2020-08-14 Thread Fabio Valentini
Hi everybody, The Java package stack cleanup process continues, and I need to do another non-responsive maintainer check, this time for: spike. I have opened the corresponding non-responsive-check bug: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1868943 There's a growing list of bugs that are

Re: s390x/fedora33 build job hangs

2020-08-13 Thread Fabio Valentini
On Thu, Aug 13, 2020 at 3:15 PM Ralf Corsepius wrote: > > Hi, > > A f33 build job, I launched a couple of hours ago, seems to hang on s390 > > https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=49204466 > > What am I supposed to do? > > Ralf Wait. It's not hanging, it's not running yet.

Re: Deprecation of Anaconda boot parameters without inst. prefix

2020-08-13 Thread Fabio Valentini
On Thu, Aug 13, 2020 at 2:16 PM wrote: > > Hello everyone, > > Anaconda team has decided to deprecate use of Anaconda kernel boot > parameters without 'inst.' prefix. As you may already know you can > specify Anaconda kernel boot parameters both with and without 'inst.' > prefix (e.g.

Re: A few questions about rpmdev-bumpspec tool

2020-08-13 Thread Fabio Valentini
On Thu, Aug 13, 2020 at 12:42 PM Qiyu Yan wrote: > > Hello all, > > I have some problem with rpmdev-bumpspec recently. > > In the latest version of rpmdevtools, rpmdev-bumpspec has changed to > use time+date in the changelog it generates[1], while the packaging > guidelines have not been updated

Non-responsive maintainer check: fnasser

2020-08-13 Thread Fabio Valentini
Hi everybody, Still working through Java package update backlog, it looks like Fernando Nasser / fnasser is no longer contributing to fedora. I have opened this non-responsive maintainer check bug: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1868600 Looking at dist-git and koji, fnasser has not

Non-responsive maintainer check: davidx

2020-08-13 Thread Fabio Valentini
Hi everybody, Working through the Java packages that are in need of attention, I came across glassfish-el and glassfish-servlet-api, which have essentially been abandoned (in the latter case, the two co-maintainers of the package were in fact already declared non-responsive last year). I filed

random doxygen issues in rawhide?

2020-08-10 Thread Fabio Valentini
Hi everybody, I've seen some doxygen issues similar to this one in other packages, but editorconfig seems to produce it quite regularly (though not reproducibly). It happened once on ppc64le and once on x86_64 in koschei: error: Could not create output directory

Re: LTO and the F33 mass rebuild

2020-08-09 Thread Fabio Valentini
On Sun, Aug 9, 2020 at 12:03 AM Jeff Law wrote: > > So I've done two passes over the F33 build failures here: > > https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/mass-rebuild/f33-failures.html Hi Jeff, Thanks for looking at the failures, it's really appreciated! Be aware that the f33-failures.html page is

Re: What do to about massive # of FTBFS bugs?

2020-08-07 Thread Fabio Valentini
On Thu, Aug 6, 2020 at 10:52 PM Jeff Law wrote: > On Thu, 2020-08-06 at 17:54 +0200, Fabio Valentini wrote: > > I can compile a list, if it helps. > Sure that helps. Those are the "suspicious" issues I found on non-x86_64 platforms: (I excluded packages that have been &q

Re: What do to about massive # of FTBFS bugs?

2020-08-06 Thread Fabio Valentini
On Thu, Aug 6, 2020 at 4:51 PM Jeff Law wrote: > > On Thu, 2020-08-06 at 06:17 -0500, Richard Shaw wrote: > > On Thu, Aug 6, 2020 at 5:08 AM Fabio Valentini wrote: > > > I'd say it's pretty safe to submit things to rawhide again. I haven't > > > seen any lingering b

Re: What do to about massive # of FTBFS bugs?

2020-08-06 Thread Fabio Valentini
On Thu, Aug 6, 2020 at 11:50 AM Kevin Kofler wrote: > > Richard Shaw wrote: > > I'm confused if I should even fix these right now due to the various > > issues I've seen on the list. > > Just set them to ASSIGNED, you have 6 months to actually fix them. > > Kevin Kofler While that might

Re: mpich always injects lto flags

2020-08-05 Thread Fabio Valentini
On Wed, Aug 5, 2020 at 9:41 PM Christoph Junghans wrote: > > On Wed, Aug 5, 2020 at 12:54 PM Jeff Law wrote: > > > > On Wed, 2020-08-05 at 12:45 -0600, Christoph Junghans wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > I am trying to rebuild espresso to adapt to the recent cmake changes, > > > when doing this I

Re: Lots of FTBFS bugs filed for S390x "BuildrootError: Requested repo (1785390) is DELETED" / "rpm.error: error reading package header" errors

2020-08-04 Thread Fabio Valentini
On Tue, Aug 4, 2020 at 5:46 PM Jonathan Wakely wrote: > > On 03/08/20 19:29 +0200, Fabio Valentini wrote: > >On Mon, Aug 3, 2020 at 6:59 PM Hans de Goede wrote: > >> > >> Hi, > >> > >> On 8/3/20 5:53 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > >> > O

Re: Did check 0.15.x in rawhide break packages' test suites?

2020-08-04 Thread Fabio Valentini
On Mon, Aug 3, 2020 at 8:32 PM Jerry James wrote: > > On Sun, Aug 2, 2020 at 11:27 AM Jerry James wrote: > > You can point the finger of blame at least partly at me for this. > > Version 0.15.0 of check introduced the use of > > __attribute__((printf)) to check the arguments to some of the >

Re: Lots of FTBFS bugs filed for S390x "BuildrootError: Requested repo (1785390) is DELETED" / "rpm.error: error reading package header" errors

2020-08-04 Thread Fabio Valentini
On Tue, Aug 4, 2020, 01:50 Michel Alexandre Salim wrote: > Hi Fabio, > > On Mon, 2020-08-03 at 19:29 +0200, Fabio Valentini wrote: > > On Mon, Aug 3, 2020 at 6:59 PM Hans de Goede > > wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > On 8/3/20 5:53 PM, Kevin Fenzi w

Re: Lots of FTBFS bugs filed for S390x "BuildrootError: Requested repo (1785390) is DELETED" / "rpm.error: error reading package header" errors

2020-08-03 Thread Fabio Valentini
On Mon, Aug 3, 2020 at 6:59 PM Hans de Goede wrote: > > Hi, > > On 8/3/20 5:53 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > On Mon, Aug 03, 2020 at 05:21:58PM +0200, Hans de Goede wrote: > >> Hi All, > >> > >> > >> I just noticed that a lot my packages got a FTBFS because of > >> failing to build on s390x. The

Re: Fedora 33 Mass Rebuild

2020-08-03 Thread Fabio Valentini
On Mon, Aug 3, 2020 at 5:15 PM Richard Hughes wrote: > > On Mon, 3 Aug 2020 at 14:02, Mohan Boddu wrote: > > Failures can be seen > > https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/mass-rebuild/f33-failures.html > > Most of those are the libcroco->gettext breakage, no? We're not going > to be rebuilding all

Re: libcroco retired on Rawhide, breaking builds

2020-08-03 Thread Fabio Valentini
On Mon, Aug 3, 2020 at 3:14 AM Elliott Sales de Andrade wrote: > Thanks. Out of my 84 FTBFS, 75% were due to this breakage. I've > already re-submitted them and they've passed, but I suspect a > reasonable number of the failures in the second pass might be related > to this. > > Only 2 were

Did check 0.15.x in rawhide break packages' test suites?

2020-08-02 Thread Fabio Valentini
Hi all, I'm looking through F33 FTBFS issues, and I see an increasing number of packages that fail to build because their test suites (using check) fail to build with errors like this: /usr/include/check.h:502:27: note: declared here 502 | CK_DLL_EXP void CK_EXPORT _ck_assert_failed(const char

Re: libcroco retired on Rawhide, breaking builds

2020-08-01 Thread Fabio Valentini
On Sat, Aug 1, 2020 at 3:12 PM Michael J Gruber wrote: > > Well, that second mass rebuild made things worse for me. The time between the > two was really short - we do need time to fix things (see below). The second > rebuild not only forced us to rebase changes which were in QA (and rewrite >

Re: libcroco retired on Rawhide, breaking builds

2020-08-01 Thread Fabio Valentini
On Sat, Aug 1, 2020 at 2:44 PM Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > On Sat, Aug 01, 2020 at 03:25:48AM -0400, Elliott Sales de Andrade wrote: > > libcroco was retired on Rawhide, but the libcroco-0.6.so.3()(64bit) it > > provides is used by libtextstyle.so.0, part of gettext. > > > > gettext is used by

Re: Fedora rawhide compose report: 20200731.n.0 changes

2020-07-31 Thread Fabio Valentini
On Fri, Jul 31, 2020 at 8:24 PM Fedora Rawhide Report wrote: > > OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20200721.n.0 > NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20200731.n.0 Wild Rawhide Compose appears! Thanks to everybody who made this one finally happen. Fabio ___ devel mailing list --

Summary/Minutes from today's FESCo Meeting (2020-07-29)

2020-07-29 Thread Fabio Valentini
= #fedora-meeting-2: FESCo (2020-07-29) = Meeting started by decathorpe at 14:00:24 UTC. The full logs are available at https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-2/2020-07-29/fesco.2020-07-29-14.00.log.html .

Re: Download all build artifacts from a scratch build?

2020-07-29 Thread Fabio Valentini
On Wed, Jul 29, 2020 at 3:31 PM Richard Shaw wrote: > > I'm working on fixing a package but I have to use scratch builds because the > tests only pass when running on koji, not a local mock build. It produces > several rpms which I'd like to download for testing purposes. > > Currently I have

Re: How do Fedora developers get access to devtoolset for testing.

2020-07-28 Thread Fabio Valentini
On Tue, Jul 28, 2020 at 9:03 PM Steven Munroe wrote: > > Dave Love writes: > > > It surprises me if that's IBM experience, and it's a bit worrying for our > > new system. > > I no longer speak for IBM (retired) so more of a personal Linux for POWER > opinion. But the Advance Toolchain (AT)

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   >