[HEADS-UP] maven 3.6 in rawhide next week

2019-10-18 Thread Fabio Valentini
Hello Packagers, As some of you might not have been aware, the Stewardship SIG has been busy keeping the Java stack in fedora alive and working. We're now left with 0 build failures on all current branches of fedora for our 235 packages, and no open FTBFS / FTI or known security issues. We've

Re: Fedora 32 System-Wide Change proposal: Modules in Non-Modular Buildroot

2019-10-17 Thread Fabio Valentini
On Thu, Oct 17, 2019 at 9:33 PM Matthew Miller wrote: > > On Wed, Oct 16, 2019 at 03:05:43PM -0700, John M. Harris Jr wrote: > > Realistically, I believe that default streams themselves are something we > > should avoid, if the cost is low, and it is. There are many users, > > probably the vast

Re: Modularity and the system-upgrade path

2019-10-17 Thread Fabio Valentini
On Thu, Oct 17, 2019 at 9:39 AM Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: > > On Wed, Oct 16, 2019 at 03:03:02PM -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote: > > On Wed, Oct 16, 2019 at 2:56 PM Matthew Miller > > wrote: > > > > > > On Wed, Oct 16, 2019 at 01:32:49PM -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote: > > > > remove it" or

Re: Modularity and the system-upgrade path

2019-10-16 Thread Fabio Valentini
On Wed, Oct 16, 2019 at 11:50 AM Alexander Bokovoy wrote: > > On ti, 15 loka 2019, John M. Harris Jr wrote: > >On Tuesday, October 15, 2019 9:40:31 PM MST Neal Gompa wrote: > >> And to be fair, while it is a hard problem to solve, it's a worthy > >> one. It makes sense and if done well, could

Re: Fedora 32 System-Wide Change proposal: Modules in Non-Modular Buildroot

2019-10-14 Thread Fabio Valentini
On Mon, Oct 14, 2019, 12:47 Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: > On Mon, Oct 14, 2019 at 12:02:46PM +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote: > > Aleksandar Kurtakov wrote: > > > You seem to totally miss the point - there is no one even trying to > ship > > > Maven as a traditional package so what should we do give up

Re: Fedora 32 System-Wide Change proposal: Modules in Non-Modular Buildroot

2019-10-14 Thread Fabio Valentini
On Mon, Oct 14, 2019 at 10:43 AM Aleksandar Kurtakov wrote: > > > > On Mon, Oct 14, 2019 at 10:13 AM John M. Harris Jr > wrote: >> >> On Sunday, October 13, 2019 11:42:41 PM MST Aleksandar Kurtakov wrote: >> > On Mon, Oct 14, 2019 at 9:00 AM John M. Harris Jr >> > >> > wrote: >> > > On

Re: Modularity and the system-upgrade path

2019-10-13 Thread Fabio Valentini
On Sun, Oct 13, 2019 at 10:48 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > On Sun, Oct 13, 2019 at 08:01:45PM +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote: > > On 13. 10. 19 19:38, Kevin Kofler wrote: > > > Ben Rosser wrote: > > > > Before things are rolled out further, I'd like to see some policies > > > > agreed upon for what

Re: Modularity and the system-upgrade path

2019-10-09 Thread Fabio Valentini
On Wed, Oct 9, 2019, 12:29 Miro Hrončok wrote: > On 04. 10. 19 21:31, Miro Hrončok wrote: > > On 04. 10. 19 16:57, Stephen Gallagher wrote: > >> Right now, there are two conflicting requirements in Fedora Modularity > >> that we need to resolve. > >> > >> 1. Once a user has selected a stream,

Re: [modularity] modularity team meeting minutes (Oct. 08, 2019)

2019-10-09 Thread Fabio Valentini
On Tue, Oct 8, 2019, 23:18 Langdon White wrote: > Minutes: > https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-3/2019-10-08/modularity.2019-10-08-15.08.html > Minutes (text): > https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-3/2019-10-08/modularity.2019-10-08-15.08.txt > Log: >

Re: Modularity and the system-upgrade path

2019-10-07 Thread Fabio Valentini
On Mon, Oct 7, 2019 at 8:02 PM Matthew Miller wrote: > > On Fri, Oct 04, 2019 at 09:31:55PM +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote: > > Wouldn't it be easier if the "default stream" would just behave like > > a regular package? > > Part of the "hybrid modularity" proposal was that the default stream could >

Re: Making testing of package updates easier

2019-10-06 Thread Fabio Valentini
On Mon, Oct 7, 2019, 00:44 Orion Poplawski wrote: > One of the tedious things I do as a package maintainer is re-building > all dependent packages with a new version of a package. My current work > flow is: > > - create a testing copr > - build the new package there > - Figure out what packages

Re: This update's test gating status has been changed to, 'greenwave_failed'.

2019-10-06 Thread Fabio Valentini
On Sun, Oct 6, 2019, 15:07 Miro Hrončok wrote: > Couple of my updates have e-mailed me $subj. Is it something to worry > about? > I got this too for a lot of my updates, just a few hours ago. I assumed it was caused by some kind of server glitch, maybe related to the current koji outage. Fabio

Re: Modularity and the system-upgrade path

2019-10-05 Thread Fabio Valentini
On Fri, Oct 4, 2019 at 9:32 PM Miro Hrončok wrote: > > On 04. 10. 19 16:57, Stephen Gallagher wrote: > > Right now, there are two conflicting requirements in Fedora Modularity > > that we need to resolve. > > > > 1. Once a user has selected a stream, updates should follow that > > stream and not

Re: Defining the future of the packager workflow in Fedora

2019-10-05 Thread Fabio Valentini
On Sat, Oct 5, 2019, 02:17 Kevin Kofler wrote: > Miro Hrončok wrote: > > It goes like this: > > > > - master and f31 are at the same commit "aa" > > - I push a change only possible in rawhide, commit "bb" to master > > (it includes release bump and changelog entry) > > - a

Re: Defining the future of the packager workflow in Fedora

2019-10-04 Thread Fabio Valentini
On Fri, Oct 4, 2019 at 5:54 PM Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: > > On Wed, Oct 02, 2019 at 08:17:37PM +0200, Ben Rosser wrote: > > Thanks for your words, I appreciate the support on the idea. > > > 1. Creating new packages has become (more of) a pain since the > > retirement of pkgdb2. I know I keep

Usage of wildcards in systemd RPM scriptlets broken on fedora >= 31?

2019-10-04 Thread Fabio Valentini
Hi everybody, To provide a bit of context: Syncthing ships unit files for both system services and user services, where the system service can be instantiated with the $USER the service should run as. The user service obviously doesn't need this argument, but will only run when the user is logged

Re: separate authentication for override creation

2019-10-04 Thread Fabio Valentini
On Fri, Oct 4, 2019 at 11:43 AM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > > Hi, > > git push — requires an ssh key (cached) > fedpkg build — requires a kerberos ticket (cached) > fedpkg override – asks for a password every damn time > > What's so special about buildroot overrides? Can we make > them

Re: Don't add default contents in `fedpkg request-branch` tickets Was: Re: can we merge package.cfg into master

2019-10-04 Thread Fabio Valentini
On Fri, Oct 4, 2019 at 10:47 AM Nicolas Chauvet wrote: > > Le jeu. 3 oct. 2019 à 21:40, Pavel Raiskup a écrit : > > > > On Friday, September 27, 2019 6:29:54 PM CEST Sérgio Basto wrote: > > > On Fri, 2019-09-27 at 12:06 -0400, Neal Gompa wrote: > > > > On Fri, Sep 27, 2019 at 12:03 PM Sérgio

Re: Request to re-review jboss-logging-tools package

2019-10-03 Thread Fabio Valentini
On Thu, Oct 3, 2019 at 9:11 PM Dinesh Prasanth Moluguwan Krishnamoorthy wrote: > > Hello everyone! > > We, the Dogtag PKI team, would like to revive the jboss-logging-tools > which was retired as part of the Fedora orphaning process. > > This package is a direct dependency for dogtag-pki project,

Re: Defining the future of the packager workflow in Fedora

2019-10-02 Thread Fabio Valentini
On Wed, Oct 2, 2019 at 7:33 PM Matthew Miller wrote: > > On Wed, Oct 02, 2019 at 05:31:56PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > > ○ Every changes to dist-git is done via pull-requests > > Erm, no thank you. Pull requests are a terrible workflow. > > It's definitely the winning workflow in the

Re: 2020 Datacenter Move: Request for comments

2019-10-02 Thread Fabio Valentini
On Wed, Oct 2, 2019 at 3:07 AM Brian (bex) Exelbierd wrote: > > > > On Tue, Oct 1, 2019 at 10:05 AM Pavel Valena wrote: >> >> - Original Message - >> > From: "Jun Aruga" >> > To: "Development discussions related to Fedora" >> > >> > Cc: "Fedora Infrastructure" >> > Sent: Monday,

Re: HEADS UP: Rawhide rebuild of Python packages with old bytecode version

2019-10-02 Thread Fabio Valentini
On Wed, Oct 2, 2019 at 9:47 AM Miro Hrončok wrote: > > Hello, > Python packages built with Python < 3.8.0b4 have invalid bytecode version, > because the version was updated in 3.8.0b4. > > To see why this is a problem, follow the bugreport: > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1748018

Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers

2019-09-30 Thread Fabio Valentini
On Mon, Sep 30, 2019 at 12:54 PM Miro Hrončok wrote: > > The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they > are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure > that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper reason: >

Orphaned paper-icon-theme

2019-09-30 Thread Fabio Valentini
Hi everybody, I've just orphaned the "paper-icon-theme" package. I no longer use it and have no interest in maintaining it further. The package is up-to-date with the latest upstream release (though the upstream project is pretty much dead now). Fabio

Orphaned libfixposix (leaf package)

2019-09-30 Thread Fabio Valentini
Hi everybody, I've just orphaned the "libfixposix" package. It used to be a dependency of one of my other packages, but it is no longer required. No more fedora packages depend on it. Fabio ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To

Orphaned pegdown (leaf package)

2019-09-29 Thread Fabio Valentini
Hi everybody, I have just orphaned the "pegdown" package, which has become a leaf package in rawhide. Its only dependent packages in fedora were maven-doxia and maven-doxia-sitetools, but the latest builds in rawhide have disabled the markdown support in these packages, and their latest upstream

Re: Fedora 31 Beta Release Announcement

2019-09-29 Thread Fabio Valentini
On Sun, Sep 29, 2019 at 3:48 AM Kevin Kofler wrote: > > Fabio Valentini wrote: > > To make things even more interesting, the non-modular Java stack has > > almost reached parity with what's available from the shiny module > > branches, except a handful of packages tha

Re: Fedora 31 Beta Release Announcement

2019-09-28 Thread Fabio Valentini
On Thu, Sep 26, 2019 at 12:19 AM Kevin Kofler wrote: > > Emmanuel Seyman wrote: > > I'm quite certain that forbidding people to move to module-only would mean > > that we would not only not have a Java stack in Fedora but also no Java > > module too. > > I think that banning module-only packages

Re: Defining the future of the packager workflow in Fedora

2019-09-26 Thread Fabio Valentini
On Thu, Sep 26, 2019 at 4:57 PM Jeremy Cline wrote: > > On Thu, Sep 26, 2019 at 04:49:31PM +0200, Fabio Valentini wrote: > > On Thu, Sep 26, 2019 at 4:47 PM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek > > wrote: > > > > > > On Thu, Sep 26, 2019 at 02:57:45PM +0100, Daniel

Re: Defining the future of the packager workflow in Fedora

2019-09-26 Thread Fabio Valentini
On Thu, Sep 26, 2019 at 4:47 PM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > > On Thu, Sep 26, 2019 at 02:57:45PM +0100, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote: > > Instead I prefer a clone of the master upstream git repo and maintain a > > branch with patches cherry-picked into it. This is used to auto-generate > >

Re: Defining the future of the packager workflow in Fedora

2019-09-26 Thread Fabio Valentini
On Thu, Sep 26, 2019 at 2:32 PM Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: > > Good Morning Everyone, Alright. I don't often reply to discussion threads like this, but here we go. > At Flock, a few of us met to discuss a future vision of the packager workflow. > This discussion was triggered by the realization

Re: Join the package collection maintainers: Visit src.fp.o to request rights?

2019-09-25 Thread Fabio Valentini
On Wed, Sep 25, 2019 at 5:13 PM Miro Hrončok wrote: > > I was recently contacted by a fellow Fedora contributor about this. > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Join_the_package_collection_maintainers says: > > > If the push fails with this kind of message: > > > > W access for why DENIED to

Re: HEADS-UP: Asciidoctor 2.0.10

2019-09-25 Thread Fabio Valentini
On Wed, Sep 25, 2019 at 5:10 PM Todd Zullinger wrote: > > Hi Vit, > > Vít Ondruch wrote: > > Dne 24. 09. 19 v 17:47 Todd Zullinger napsal(a): > >> These srpm's require asciidoctor or rubygems-asciidoctor: > >> > >> awesome > >> booth > >> hugo > >> ipmctl > >> js8call > >>

Re: Orphaned a number of Eclipse pacakges

2019-09-23 Thread Fabio Valentini
On Mon, Sep 23, 2019 at 3:53 PM Miro Hrončok wrote: > > On 23. 09. 19 15:34, Aleksandar Kurtakov wrote: > > As eclipse module is the supported way to get eclipse now... > > So why do we keep everything around in Fedora and crate this duality? Looking at koschei [0], eclipse packages are going to

Re: Some Java packages in need of new permanent maintainer(s)

2019-09-23 Thread Fabio Valentini
On Sun, Sep 8, 2019 at 8:50 PM Fabio Valentini wrote: > > Hello packagers, > > The Stewardship SIG is currently providing only bare-minimum > maintenance for some Java packages, and none of our packages depend on > them anymore. > So, we're looking for someone to tak

Re: RPM Fusion Bugzilla Bug 5307

2019-09-22 Thread Fabio Valentini
On Sun, Sep 22, 2019, 10:09 Leigh Scott wrote: > > On Sat, Sep 21, 2019 at 8:33 PM Ty Young wrote: > > Fedora and other distributions have been working on rootless Xorg > > since 2013. We've had it in place since at least 2015. This change was > > made way back in Fedora 24. > > > > Do you mean

Re: Add a rule to have a compose when Fedora branched

2019-09-17 Thread Fabio Valentini
On Tue, Sep 17, 2019, 16:28 Miro Hrončok wrote: > On 17. 09. 19 15:58, jkone...@redhat.com wrote: > > To make things even worse there was a switch to python 3.8 on Rawhide > > which wasn't really prepared (pylint did not worked). > > I trust that your intentions were only the best when you wrote

Re: Which arch should we add to Copr?

2019-09-17 Thread Fabio Valentini
On Tue, Sep 17, 2019, 12:49 Dominik Turecek wrote: > Hello, > > we are now able to build for armhfp and s390x architectures in Copr. > However, due to storage issues, we can enable only one of these > two right now. Which architecture would you prefer to have? > Support for armv7hl would be

Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers

2019-09-16 Thread Fabio Valentini
On Mon, Sep 16, 2019 at 5:18 PM Ricardo Martinelli Oliveira wrote: > > I'll take cassandar Hi Ricardo, You should be aware that to keep cassandra alive you'll probably need to adopt a few dozen more packages, since they're dependencies of cassandra. This includes logback, groovy, and gradle

Orphaned pdf-renderer (leaf package)

2019-09-15 Thread Fabio Valentini
I've just orphaned the pdf-renderer package, which was maintained by the Stewardship SIG. There are no dependent packages left in fedora, since itext was recently retired. Fabio ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe

Re: Orphaned packages to be retired (~400 during this week)

2019-09-13 Thread Fabio Valentini
On Fri, Sep 13, 2019 at 6:11 PM Michael Schwendt wrote: > > On Mon, 9 Sep 2019 23:49:17 +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote: > > > Request package ownership via releng issues: > > https://pagure.io/releng/issues > > How? Click "New Issue", fill out "package_unorphan" or "package_unretirement" template,

Re: Possibly unresponsive maintainer: vakwetu

2019-09-13 Thread Fabio Valentini
0200, Miro Hrončok wrote: > > On 13. 09. 19 12:05, Fabio Valentini wrote: > > > On Tue, Jul 9, 2019 at 8:17 PM Fabio Valentini > > > wrote: > > > > On Tue, Jul 9, 2019 at 7:51 PM Dinesh Prasanth Moluguwan > > > > Krishnamoorthy wrote: > > >

Re: Possibly unresponsive maintainer: vakwetu

2019-09-13 Thread Fabio Valentini
On Tue, Jul 9, 2019 at 8:17 PM Fabio Valentini wrote: > > On Tue, Jul 9, 2019 at 7:51 PM Dinesh Prasanth Moluguwan > Krishnamoorthy wrote: > > > > Hello everyone, > > > > As Rob had responded earlier, he is away for few weeks. A while back, I > > sp

Re: Some Java packages in need of new permanent maintainer(s)

2019-09-10 Thread Fabio Valentini
On Tue, Sep 10, 2019 at 11:23 AM Dridi Boukelmoune wrote: > > On Sun, Sep 8, 2019 at 6:51 PM Fabio Valentini wrote: > > > > Hello packagers, > > > > The Stewardship SIG is currently providing only bare-minimum > > maintenance for some Java packages, and non

Re: bodhi branched updates: how many days until stable - 3, 7, 14?

2019-09-09 Thread Fabio Valentini
On Mon, Sep 9, 2019 at 4:52 PM Miro Hrončok wrote: > > On 09. 09. 19 16:40, Fabio Valentini wrote: > > Did some policy change occur which I am not aware of, or is bodhi just > > misconfigured again for branched? > > https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/8161 Ah, s

bodhi branched updates: how many days until stable - 3, 7, 14?

2019-09-09 Thread Fabio Valentini
Hi everybody, I seem to remember that bodhi updates for branched releases only required 3 days in testing until they could be pushed to stable. However, for fedora 31, the default (and minimum) is 7 days, and for critpath packages, the default (and minimum) 14 days, like for normal "released"

Orphaned adapta-gtk-theme, adapta-backgrounds

2019-09-09 Thread Fabio Valentini
Hello packagers, I've just orphaned both adapta-gtk-theme and adapta-backgrounds. The upstream project is more or less dead, since the main developer left after getting a lot of negative feedback for the release of a big refresh / redesign of the Adapta GTK theme (which was then reverted). The

Re: Some Java packages in need of new permanent maintainer(s)

2019-09-09 Thread Fabio Valentini
On Mon, Sep 9, 2019 at 10:58 AM Mat Booth wrote: >> >> Directly dependent packages of jboss-jstl-1.2-api: >> - jboss-jsf-2.1-api >> - jboss-jsf-2.2-api Hi Mat! > IMO, you should just retire the jboss/wildfly stack right now. It has not > been maintained for years already: >

Some Java packages in need of new permanent maintainer(s)

2019-09-08 Thread Fabio Valentini
Hello packagers, The Stewardship SIG is currently providing only bare-minimum maintenance for some Java packages, and none of our packages depend on them anymore. So, we're looking for someone to take better care of them, preferably someone who actively uses these packages or maintains a package

Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers

2019-09-04 Thread Fabio Valentini
On Wed, Sep 4, 2019 at 2:47 PM Miro Hrončok wrote: > > On 04. 09. 19 14:12, Fabio Valentini wrote: > > Be advised that clojure has failed to build since fedora 23, according to > > koji. > > I wonder why it hasn't been retired at some point ... > > The mass re

Re: Unannounced libproj soname bump

2019-09-04 Thread Fabio Valentini
On Wed, Sep 4, 2019 at 2:41 PM Petr Pisar wrote: > > I noticed proj-5.2.0 was rebased to 6.2.0 in Fedora ≥ 31. This rebase > changed libproj soname from libproj.so.13 to libproj.so.15. I don't think this soname bump even happened by accident, because the .so file names %files entries in the

Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers

2019-09-04 Thread Fabio Valentini
On Tue, Sep 3, 2019 at 5:41 PM Markku Korkeala wrote: > > Miro Hrončok kirjoitti 2019-09-02 13:00: > > clojure kushal, orphan, s4504kr, 1 > > weeks ago > > salimma, walters > > I would like to take clojure, filed a releng ticket:

Re: Is Modularity (MBS) dead?

2019-09-03 Thread Fabio Valentini
On Tue, Sep 3, 2019 at 5:52 PM Miro Hrončok wrote: > > On 01. 09. 19 21:38, Igor Gnatenko wrote: > > So did I miss some announcement that Modularity is RIP and nobody > > should use it or just nobody cares about it and I should find more > > reliable way to deliver Rust apps? > > As a bit off

Re: Sponsorship request

2019-09-02 Thread Fabio Valentini
On Mon, Sep 2, 2019 at 9:45 PM David Kaufmann wrote: > > Hi! > > I'm looking for a sponsor to get rss2email back into fedora (it's > orphaned and retired right now, as it's been FTBFS too long) > > I've already got the package reviewed (bug 1740389), but forgot the > FE-NEEDSPONSOR dependency, so

Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers

2019-09-02 Thread Fabio Valentini
On Mon, Sep 2, 2019 at 12:02 PM Miro Hrončok wrote: (snip) > stewardship-sig: logback, gpars, groovy, gmavenplus-plugin I submitted a new build for maven yesterday which removes its dependency on logback, which in turn also means we no longer depend on gpars, groovy, or gmavenplus-plugin.

Re: [HEADS-UP] snakeyaml 1.25 update

2019-08-30 Thread Fabio Valentini
On Thu, Aug 29, 2019 at 11:15 PM Fabio Valentini wrote: > > On Mon, Aug 26, 2019 at 10:36 AM Vít Ondruch wrote: > > > > > > Dne 25. 08. 19 v 14:06 Fabio Valentini napsal(a): > > > Hi everybody, > > > > > > Right now, the snakeyaml package in f

Re: [HEADS-UP] snakeyaml 1.25 update

2019-08-29 Thread Fabio Valentini
On Mon, Aug 26, 2019 at 10:36 AM Vít Ondruch wrote: > > > Dne 25. 08. 19 v 14:06 Fabio Valentini napsal(a): > > Hi everybody, > > > > Right now, the snakeyaml package in fedora is out of date by more than > > three years (1.17, released in February 2016). We

Re: Non-responsive maintainer

2019-08-29 Thread Fabio Valentini
On Thu, Aug 29, 2019 at 7:51 PM Greg Hellings wrote: > > The jenkins pacakge is fearfully out of date and seems unmaintained. Does > anyone know how to get in touch with the maintainer(s) of the package? > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1560603 It's not only out of date, but also

Re: Some Java packages in need of new permanent maintainer(s)

2019-08-27 Thread Fabio Valentini
On Wed, Aug 14, 2019 at 12:08 PM Fabio Valentini wrote: > > Hello packagers, > > The Stewardship SIG is currently providing only bare-minimum > maintenance for some Java packages, and none of our packages depend on > them anymore. > So, we're looking for someone to tak

Re: What projects can we highlight for Hacktoberfest?

2019-08-26 Thread Fabio Valentini
On Mon, Aug 26, 2019 at 10:46 PM Ben Cotton wrote: > > We're just over a month away from Hacktoberfest[1], a month-long event > where people can earn a t-shirt by contributing to open source > projects (or at least ones hosted on GitHub). It occurs to me that we > could have a post on the

[HEADS-UP] snakeyaml 1.25 update

2019-08-25 Thread Fabio Valentini
Hi everybody, Right now, the snakeyaml package in fedora is out of date by more than three years (1.17, released in February 2016). We plan to merge the PR rebasing it to the latest version (1.25, released this month) into master / rawhide and f31. The new versions include *a lot of bug fixes*,

Re: Error with fedpkg update

2019-08-23 Thread Fabio Valentini
On Fri, Aug 23, 2019 at 7:58 PM Gerald B. Cox wrote: > > > > On Fri, Aug 23, 2019 at 1:49 PM Adam Williamson > wrote: >> >> >> > >> > bodhi is not yet enabled for fedora 31. >> > >> > According to the schedule, that's supposed to happen on 2019-08-29: >> >

Re: [HEADS UP] Fedora 32 Python 3.8 rebuilds have started in a side tag

2019-08-23 Thread Fabio Valentini
On Fri, Aug 23, 2019, 17:07 Kaleb Keithley wrote: > > > On Wed, Aug 21, 2019 at 1:23 PM Miro Hrončok wrote: > >> On 15. 08. 19 0:18, Miro Hrončok wrote: >> > Hello, in order to deliver Python 3.8, we are running a coordinated >> rebuild in a >> > side tag. >> > >> >> The side tag was merged.

[Help needed] Packaging sassc ruby gem for jekyll 4.0.0

2019-08-23 Thread Fabio Valentini
Hi everybody, With the recent, major new release of Jekyll (4.0.0) and its SASS converter (2.0.0), it migrated from the deprecated, plain ruby "sass" gem to "sassc", which is a wrapper around the libsass C++ library. I've never had to deal with this scenario for my other ruby packages, and I just

Re: Error with fedpkg update

2019-08-23 Thread Fabio Valentini
On Fri, Aug 23, 2019 at 4:18 PM Gerald B. Cox wrote: > > I've been trying to submit an update to testing for several days now and it > keeps failing > with the following message: > > Could not execute update: Could not generate update request: Cannot find > release associated with build:

Re: plan to orphan cassandra

2019-08-22 Thread Fabio Valentini
On Thu, Aug 22, 2019, 15:19 Honza Horak wrote: > Cassandra has been originally packaged by folks in our team, in the time > we had some stakes there. Since then, priorities changed and also people > involved are not in our team any more. We tried to keep it packaged in > Fedora with reasonable

Re: nothing provides pkgconfig(egl) needed by qt5-qtbase-devel

2019-08-21 Thread Fabio Valentini
On Wed, Aug 21, 2019, 21:13 Scott Talbert wrote: > On Wed, 21 Aug 2019, Scott Talbert wrote: > > >> I'm hit by the above error in rawhide. > >> > >> Is this expected or unexpected failure? > > > > I just filed https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1744292 > > > > But it may be expected? >

Re: [HEADS UP] Fedora 32 Python 3.8 rebuilds have started in a side tag

2019-08-21 Thread Fabio Valentini
On Wed, Aug 21, 2019, 19:31 Miro Hrončok wrote: > On 15. 08. 19 0:18, Miro Hrončok wrote: > > Hello, in order to deliver Python 3.8, we are running a coordinated > rebuild in a > > side tag. > > > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Python3.8 > > > > If you see a "Rebuild for Python

Re: Rebase option suddenly missing from src.fo.o PRs?

2019-08-20 Thread Fabio Valentini
that the UI is broken. Fabio 19/8/20 11:26(e)an, Fabio Valentini igorleak idatzi zuen: > > On Tue, Aug 20, 2019 at 11:16 AM Miro Hrončok > wrote: > > I've recently noticed that src.fo.o PRs no longer let me click "Rebase" under > the "Merge" button. >

Re: Rebase option suddenly missing from src.fo.o PRs?

2019-08-20 Thread Fabio Valentini
On Tue, Aug 20, 2019 at 11:16 AM Miro Hrončok wrote: > > I've recently noticed that src.fo.o PRs no longer let me click "Rebase" under > the "Merge" button. > > Am I the only one impacted? > > Is that deliberate or some bug worth reporting? FWIW, the "Merge" button from the "merge popup" is also

Re: Cannot build with mock for rawhide on Fedora 30

2019-08-17 Thread Fabio Valentini
On Sat, Aug 17, 2019 at 5:08 PM Iñaki Ucar wrote: > > The same happens in Copr. > > Iñaki > > El sáb., 17 ago. 2019 12:53, Till Hofmann > escribió: >> >> Hi all, >> >> I'm facing an issue with the package signatures on Fedora when trying to >> build in rawhide chroot: >> $ mock -r

Re: findbugs-contrib building on i686 builders despite ExcludeArch

2019-08-17 Thread Fabio Valentini
On Sat, Aug 17, 2019, 11:33 Richard Fearn wrote: > Thanks, Jason and Vit, for your replies. Unfortunately it looks like > many of findbugs-contrib's Java dependencies are being retired at the > moment, so I need to decide what to do about that first... > Let me suggest joining the Java SIG (if

Re: [HEADS-UP] gradle will go away

2019-08-14 Thread Fabio Valentini
On Wed, Aug 14, 2019, 13:48 Mat Booth wrote: > > > On Fri, 9 Aug 2019 at 14:24, Fabio Valentini wrote: > > > > Hi everybody! > > > > After some discussions, we (the Stewardship SIG) have decided that we > > cannot continue to maintain gradle in fedora.

Some Java packages in need of new permanent maintainer(s)

2019-08-14 Thread Fabio Valentini
Hello packagers, The Stewardship SIG is currently providing only bare-minimum maintenance for some Java packages, and none of our packages depend on them anymore. So, we're looking for someone to take better care of them, preferably someone who actively uses these packages or maintains a package

Some NodeJS packages in need of new permanent maintainer(s)

2019-08-14 Thread Fabio Valentini
Hello packagers, The Stewardship SIG is currently providing only bare-minimum maintenance for some NodeJS packages, and none of our packages depend on them anymore. So, we're looking for someone to take better care of them, preferably someone who actively uses these packages or maintains a

[HEADS-UP] gradle will go away

2019-08-09 Thread Fabio Valentini
Hi everybody! After some discussions, we (the Stewardship SIG) have decided that we cannot continue to maintain gradle in fedora. - the current version packaged in fedora is outdated (4.4.1, from Dec. 2017, vs. 5.5.1 from July 2019) - it currently doesn't build itself (not even in bootstrap

[HEADS-UP] gradle will go away

2019-08-09 Thread Fabio Valentini
Hi everybody! After some discussions, we (the Stewardship SIG) have decided that we cannot continue to maintain gradle in fedora. - the current version packaged in fedora is outdated (4.4.1, from Dec. 2017, vs. 5.5.1 from July 2019) - it currently doesn't build itself (not even in bootstrap

gettext retired, rawhide broken

2019-08-08 Thread Fabio Valentini
Can somebody please unretire and fix gettext? It was just automatically retired because it didn't build successfully since fedora 29. And now the world is broken. Fabio ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email

Re: Fedora rawhide compose report: 20190806.n.0 changes

2019-08-06 Thread Fabio Valentini
54.93 KiB > Changelog: > * Sat Aug 03 2019 Lukas Vrabec - 20190801-1 > - update to 20190801 > > > Package: recoll-1.25.20-1.fc31 > Old package: recoll-1.25.16-2.fc31 > Summary: Desktop full text search tool with Qt GUI > RPMs: recoll recoll-gssp recoll-k

Re: I wish to drop python2-Cython

2019-08-06 Thread Fabio Valentini
On Tue, Aug 6, 2019, 15:17 Miro Hrončok wrote: > On 06. 08. 19 14:13, Mat Booth wrote: > > > > On Tue, 6 Aug 2019 at 13:11, Miro Hrončok > > wrote: > > > > On 06. 08. 19 14:07, Mat Booth wrote: > > > eclipse-pydev > > > unused build dep > >

Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers

2019-08-05 Thread Fabio Valentini
On Mon, Aug 5, 2019 at 1:15 PM Mikolaj Izdebski wrote: > > On Mon, Aug 5, 2019 at 12:07 PM Hans de Goede wrote: > > In the extended version: > > https://churchyard.fedorapeople.org/orphans-2019-08-05.txt > > I see that javapackages-tools is still on the list (because it depends on > > gradle)

Re: systemd-243-rc1

2019-08-03 Thread Fabio Valentini
On Sat, Aug 3, 2019, 20:19 Matthew Miller wrote: > On Thu, Aug 01, 2019 at 10:16:40AM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > > Hmm. I never really chipped into the ~ discussion, but it just occurred > > to me it intersects with a discussion I care quite a lot about: RPM > > version comparison.

Re: systemd-243-rc1

2019-08-03 Thread Fabio Valentini
On Fri, Aug 2, 2019, 11:39 Fabio Valentini wrote: > On Fri, Aug 2, 2019, 11:33 Adam Williamson > wrote: > >> On Thu, 2019-08-01 at 14:36 +0200, Nicolas Mailhot via devel wrote: >> > Le jeudi 01 août 2019 à 14:19 +0200, Lennart Poettering a écrit : >> > > On

Re: systemd-243-rc1

2019-08-03 Thread Fabio Valentini
On Fri, Aug 2, 2019, 11:33 Adam Williamson wrote: > On Thu, 2019-08-01 at 14:36 +0200, Nicolas Mailhot via devel wrote: > > Le jeudi 01 août 2019 à 14:19 +0200, Lennart Poettering a écrit : > > > On Do, 01.08.19 10:14, Fabio Valentini (decatho...@gmail.com) wrote: &

Re: systemd-243-rc1

2019-08-01 Thread Fabio Valentini
On Thu, Aug 1, 2019 at 9:48 AM Lennart Poettering wrote: > > On Mi, 31.07.19 20:52, Fedora Development ML (devel@lists.fedoraproject.org) > wrote: > > > Instead, as Lennart explained, systemd has no strong release > > discipline. systemd didn't provide anyone a fixed version (requiring > >

Re: Rolling out Phase I of rawhide package gating

2019-07-31 Thread Fabio Valentini
On Wed, Jul 31, 2019, 22:42 Kevin Fenzi wrote: > On 7/31/19 9:29 AM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > On Wed, Jul 31, 2019 at 05:06:17PM +0100, Tom Hughes wrote: > >> On 31/07/2019 16:58, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: > >> > >>> My canary ran took 24 minutes, apparently the CI pipeline was slower >

Re: Authentication in fedpkg

2019-07-31 Thread Fabio Valentini
On Wed, Jul 31, 2019 at 8:00 PM Björn Persson wrote: > > I recently added two new packages to Fedora. Things have changed a bit > since the previous time I did this, and more things can now be done > through fedpkg. I would like to share my experience with this. This is > what the procedure is

Re: "javaewah" (was Re: Over 500 orphaned packages seeking new maintainers)

2019-07-30 Thread Fabio Valentini
On Tue, Jul 30, 2019 at 10:47 PM Dave Dykstra wrote: > > Alex, > > Thanks for the quick response. I see that one of my packages > (singularity) has BuildRequires git. However, installing git on fc31 > does not install jgit. Maybe jgit is a BuildRequires of git, but it's > not clear to me that

Re: Rolling out Phase I of rawhide package gating

2019-07-30 Thread Fabio Valentini
On Tue, Jul 30, 2019 at 4:16 PM Florian Weimer wrote: > > * Pierre-Yves Chibon: > > > What does it mean for us as packagers? > > -- > > > > When you run `fedpkg build` on Rawhide, your package will be built in > > a new koji tag (which will be the default

Re: Rolling out Phase I of rawhide package gating

2019-07-30 Thread Fabio Valentini
On Thu, Jul 25, 2019 at 5:25 PM Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: > > Good Morning Everyone, > > I just wanted to let everyone know that this is now live. > You can see all the updates going through (or not) to rawhide in: > https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/releases/F31 > > Many many thanks to all the

Re: Over 500 orphaned packages seeking new maintainers

2019-07-29 Thread Fabio Valentini
On Mon, Jul 29, 2019, 16:40 Miro Hrončok wrote: > On 29. 07. 19 16:35, Hans de Goede wrote: > > Hi, > > > > On 29-07-19 12:37, Miro Hrončok wrote: > >> The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they > >> are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for >

Re: mass rebuild, glusterfs build failed

2019-07-26 Thread Fabio Valentini
On Fri, Jul 26, 2019 at 8:19 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > On 7/25/19 11:05 AM, Kaleb Keithley wrote: > > hmmm. from the root.log > > > > DEBUG util.py:585: BUILDSTDERR: Error: > > DEBUG util.py:585: BUILDSTDERR: Problem: conflicting requests > > DEBUG util.py:585: BUILDSTDERR: - nothing

Non-responsive maintainer: tonet666p

2019-07-23 Thread Fabio Valentini
Hi everybody, Does anybody know how to contact tonet666p? One of his packageshas been broken for a while, and he doesn't respond on bugzilla: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1480028 If there's no positive response within the next week, I'll open a fesco ticket in accordance with the

Re: Discussion around app retirements and categorizations by the CPE team

2019-07-22 Thread Fabio Valentini
On Mon, Jul 22, 2019 at 4:59 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > On 7/22/19 1:22 AM, Miro Hrončok wrote: > > On 16. 07. 19 20:18, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: > >> Good Morning, > >> > >> We posted this [1] blog today and want to open a mailing thread to garner > >> feedback, field questions and get some

Re: google-oauth-java-client / javapackages-tools (was: Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers (75 to be retired))

2019-07-22 Thread Fabio Valentini
On Mon, Jul 22, 2019 at 12:33 PM Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > On Mon, Jul 22, 2019 at 10:47:10AM +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote: > > See this report online at: > > https://churchyard.fedorapeople.org/orphans-2019-07-22.txt > > Since the majority of new failures (394!) are caused by the orphaning > of

Re: Updating wcslib in Rawhide to 6.3

2019-07-21 Thread Fabio Valentini
On Sun, Jul 21, 2019 at 12:38 PM Sergio Pascual wrote: > > Hello, I'm going to update wcslib from 5.19 to 6.3. It breaks API, so I'm > announcing it here in advance. > > The policy [1] says that I should notify also the maintainers of the packages > that depend on mine. What command I have to

Re: Fedora 31 System-Wide Change proposal (late): No i686 Repositories

2019-07-15 Thread Fabio Valentini
On Mon, Jul 15, 2019, 19:33 Kevin Fenzi wrote: > On 7/15/19 5:43 AM, Fabio Valentini wrote: > > > (I for one am still semi-regularly building stuff in the mock > > fedora-rawhide-i686 chroots, especially for testing if things still > > work on 32bit systems (be it a

Re: nettle: heads up soname bump

2019-07-15 Thread Fabio Valentini
On Mon, Jul 15, 2019 at 2:48 PM Miro Hrončok wrote: > > On 15. 07. 19 13:54, Miro Hrončok wrote: > > On 15. 07. 19 13:24, Miro Hrončok wrote: > >> On 15. 07. 19 12:41, Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos wrote: > >>> Hi, > >>> The latest nettle (3.5.1) update will break ABI on rawhide. The API > >>>

Re: Fedora 31 System-Wide Change proposal (late): No i686 Repositories

2019-07-15 Thread Fabio Valentini
On Mon, Jul 15, 2019 at 12:45 PM Jiri Vanek wrote: > > On 7/15/19 11:34 AM, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote: > > Hello, Dridi Boukelmoune. > > > > Mon, 15 Jul 2019 08:26:59 + you wrote: > > > >> Emulate as in not run natively even though the hardware might be able to? > > > > Sorry for

Re: Possibly unresponsive maintainer: vakwetu

2019-07-09 Thread Fabio Valentini
On Tue, Jul 9, 2019 at 7:51 PM Dinesh Prasanth Moluguwan Krishnamoorthy wrote: > > Hello everyone, > > As Rob had responded earlier, he is away for few weeks. A while back, I > spoke to him in person about handing over the RESTeasy packages to the > Fedora SIG. He had agreed to it. Once he is

  1   2   3   4   >