Re: F35 Change: Disable SHA1 In OpenDNSSec (Self-Contained Change proposal)

Hi Paul, all, On Tue, Jun 29, 2021 at 1:40 AM Paul Wouters wrote: > > On Mon, 28 Jun 2021, Ben Cotton wrote: > > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Change/DisableSHA1InOpenDNSSec > > > == Detailed Description == > > > > OpenDNSSec changed the default behavior to not include SHA1 DS by > > default,

Re: F35 Change: Disable SHA1 In OpenDNSSec (Self-Contained Change proposal)

Hi Paul, all, On Tue, Jun 29, 2021 at 1:40 AM Paul Wouters wrote: > > On Mon, 28 Jun 2021, Ben Cotton wrote: > > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Change/DisableSHA1InOpenDNSSec > > > == Detailed Description == > > > > OpenDNSSec changed the default behavior to not include SHA1 DS by > > default,

Re: Does anyone know how to contact Ryan Rix (rrix)?

Hi Ryan, Thanks for your contributions during all these years. I've taken over python-netifaces. Feel free to handover cowsay-beefymiracle to me if you like. My FAS is fcami. Cheers François On Fri, Jun 11, 2021 at 11:25 PM Ryan Rix wrote: > > Thanks Kevin, > > I've orphaned python-netifaces

Does anyone know how to contact Ryan Rix (rrix)?

Hi, This is the official unresponsive maintainer check for rrix. Associated bz: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1968568 Ryan's last build was nearly 7 years ago: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/userinfo?userID=1124 Neglected bz:

Does anyone know how to contact Greg Swift (xaeth)?

Hi, This is the official unresponsive maintainer check for xaeth. Associated bz: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1949831 Greg's last build was 7 years ago: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/userinfo?userID=1887 Neglected bz: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1495323

Re: doxbox-staging package conflict

On Tue, Jun 1, 2021 at 10:36 PM Neal Gompa wrote: > > On Tue, Jun 1, 2021 at 4:34 PM Otto Urpelainen wrote: > > > > Hans de Goede kirjoitti 1.6.2021 klo 21.02: > > > Hi, > > > > > > On 6/1/21 6:20 PM, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote: > > >> Hello all. > > >> > > >> doxbox-staging is trying to

Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers (~200 nodejs packages to be retired in 2 days)

On Mon, Jun 22, 2020 at 3:15 PM Miro Hrončok wrote: > > On 22. 06. 20 15:02, François Cami wrote: > > Hi, > > > > On Mon, Jun 22, 2020 at 2:38 PM Miro Hrončok wrote: > >> > >> The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they > >>

Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers (~200 nodejs packages to be retired in 2 days)

Hi, On Mon, Jun 22, 2020 at 2:38 PM Miro Hrončok wrote: > > The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they > are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure > that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper reason: >

Re: unresponsive maintainer: itamarjp

Hi, On Sun, Mar 29, 2020 at 10:50 PM Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote: > > Hi, François. > > On Sunday, 29 March 2020 at 14:59, François Cami wrote: > > Hi Itamar, > > > > I am starting the unresponsive maintainer process [0], because > > packages you

unresponsive maintainer: itamarjp

Hi Itamar, I am starting the unresponsive maintainer process [0], because packages you maintain or co-maintain are FTBFS [1]. Your last build action in koji dates from early December 2019 [2]. Unfortunately, a lot of your packages are scheduled to be orphaned [3] soon. I will follow the

Re: Policy for non-responsive reviewers

On Sun, Feb 9, 2020 at 5:15 PM Jerry James wrote: > > On Sun, Feb 9, 2020 at 4:21 AM Elliott Sales de Andrade > wrote: > > Looking at policies, I see one for non-responsive maintainerw [1], but > > I don't think this really applies. There's a page about the package > > review process [2] which

Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers (incl. wine, dosbox, nextcloud, owncloud)

t; in your fear, seek only peace > in your fear, seek only love > -d. bowie > > Sent with ProtonMail Secure Email. > > ‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐ > On Wednesday, November 6, 2019 3:28 PM, François Cami > wrote: > > > On Wed, Nov 6, 2019 at 8:48 PM Gwyn Ci

Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers (incl. wine, dosbox, nextcloud, owncloud)

On Wed, Nov 6, 2019 at 8:48 PM Gwyn Ciesla via devel wrote: > > I'll take openal-soft, pdfbox, freealut, python-httplib2, and dosbox. FAS:limb Heh, I wanted to take openal-soft and dosbox as I've been the de-facto maintainer for some time. FAS: fcami https://pagure.io/releng/issue/8972 Gwyn,

Re: Orphaned packages that will be retired (and everything will most likely burn)

On Thu, Feb 28, 2019 at 5:03 PM Alexander Bokovoy wrote: > > On to, 28 helmi 2019, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > >On Thu, 28 Feb 2019 at 06:11, Ingo Hoffmann wrote: > >> > >> Hi, > >> > >> First time here and concerned Java citizen. Who or how can I contact > >> regarding the maven package

Re: Orphaned packages that will be retired

On Mon, Feb 25, 2019 at 9:51 PM Miro Hrončok wrote: > > The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they > are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure > that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper reason: >

taking over some of fale's packages

Hi, As fale has orphaned packages ( https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/thread/TTRKFTADCEHAJSZ55YXIPT3DOZY5RTYW/ ) I would like to take over rubygem-asciidoctor-pdf and some of its dependencies. I've opened https://pagure.io/releng/issue/7855 Please let

Re: Fedora 27 kernel updates make system unbootable (sort of)

> On Fri, Apr 20, 2018 at 3:32 PM, Lennart Poettering > > OK after a bunch of additional testing, one thing is certain; grubby > and grub-mkconfig are not even remotely crash safe. They do not > fsync() or sync() at all. That's not good no matter the file system.

Re: Unannounced SONAME bump in tinyxml2

> On Wed, Jan 24, 2018 at 11:15 AM, Matthew Miller > > Isn't it also moderated? Which would mean the moderator has to be > paying attention and let it through... > > I like devel +maintainers directly. We seem to have reached consensus in that either devel

Re: Unannounced SONAME bump in tinyxml2

> announcement should be made here too + > Rule of thumb: more communication is better. Ack. Change proposal for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Updates_Policy#Rawhide_.2F_devel_.2F_master "A week in advance, notify maintainers who depend on their package to rebuild when there are abi/api

Re: Unannounced SONAME bump in tinyxml2

> announcement should be made here too Okay, so I'm officially confused. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Updates_Policy#Rawhide_.2F_devel_.2F_master says: "For updates to rawhide packages, Maintainers SHOULD: (...) A week in advance, notify maintainers who depend on their package to rebuild when

Re: Unannounced SONAME bump in tinyxml2

On Tue, Jan 23, 2018 at 2:48 PM, Igor Gnatenko wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA256 > > https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/tinyxml2/c/3600750a8f1b0eaa6cab346496fd75a07 > ea749cb This was announced to all package owners depending on tinyxml2

Re: orphaning all my packages

Hi, I've ack'ed all the requests and orphaned the rest of my packages. Please note that this is due to a chronic lack of free time and has nothing to do with Fedora itself. You are a wonderful community :) All the best, François On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 5:36 PM, François Cami <fdc

Re: orphaning all my packages

On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 12:54 PM, Igor Gnatenko <ignate...@redhat.com> wrote: > I would like to take enet. It's all yours. > - Original Message - >> From: "François Cami" <fdc-li...@fcami.net> >> To: "Development discussions related to Fedo

Re: orphaning all my packages

Hi Raphael, On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 10:42 PM, Raphael Groner wrote: > Hi François, > > I'm interested in some of the mentioned packages and requested in PkgDB: > > - bats > - unittest-cpp Thanks! They're all yours. I'm just a co-maintainers of the others (below) so

Re: osgaudio packaging (bundles/provides openalpp)

Hi Dominik, On Fri, Apr 15, 2016 at 11:52 PM, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski <domi...@greysector.net> wrote: > Hi, François. > Sorry for late reply. > > On Wednesday, 23 March 2016 at 00:43, François Cami wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I'd like to package osgaudio, whic

orphaning all my packages

Hello, I'll orphan all my packages at 2PM UTC+2 tomorrow. rpms/bats -- Bash Automated Testing System ( master f24 f23 f22 epel7 el6 ) rpms/djview4 -- DjVu viewer ( epel7 ) rpms/djvulibre -- DjVu viewers, encoders, and utilities ( master f24 f23 f22 epel7 el6 ) rpms/enet -- Thin, simple and

osgaudio packaging (bundles/provides openalpp)

Hi, I'd like to package osgaudio, which is an OpenSceneGraph-like frontend to OpenAL. It is currently maintained by OpenSceneGraph's main author at: https://github.com/robertosfield/osgaudio/ It requires and contains openalpp, a C++ frontend for OpenAL. We haven't shipped openalpp since Fedora

gcc6 / arm rebuild issue

Hi, openal-soft fails to build on arm / f24, probably due to a toolchain change: " /usr/lib/gcc/armv7hl-redhat-linux-gnueabi/6.0.0/include/arm_neon.h:9013:1: error: inlining failed in call to always_inline 'vld1q_f32': target specific option mismatch " The complete build log is located at:

Re: unresponsive maintainer: landgraf

On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 6:21 PM, Pavel Zhukov pa...@zhukoff.net wrote: First of all at the moment I'm sick. Ok. Get well first. I have more urgent bugs/packages to update and will check mupdf once I have time. Much appreciated. And Patches are welcome! The reporter of bz #1122539 has

unresponsive maintainer: landgraf

Greetings, I'm starting the unresponsive maintainer policy for Pavel Zhukov (landgraf), as mupdf hasn't been updated in a while: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1148319 which leads to interesting bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1122539 and blocks the

orphaning a few packages

Hello, I'm orphaning a few packages as I do not use them anymore. * scons * jed * greylistd * and the zathura stack: girara, zathura, zathura-cb, zathura-djvu, zathura-pdf-poppler, zathura-ps (maintained by contyk) Regards, François -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: nonresponsive maintainer - Axel Thimm

On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 5:20 AM, Orion Poplawski or...@cora.nwra.com wrote: I'm continuing the nonresponsive maintainer process for Axel Thimm https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1186467 +1 I've been effectively maintaining a number of Axel's packages for years now. Time to get them

Re: GUI applications writing garbage to stdout/stderr

Hello, On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 11:22 AM, Marcel Oliver m.oli...@jacobs-university.de wrote: Many GUI applications write garbage to either stdout or stderr, making the terminal windows difficult to view and navigate. (...) Some of the main culprints for me are nemo, evince, and okular; if I

ocl-icd: update to 2.2.3 in a week

Hi, I'll update ocl-icd to the latest release (2.2.3) in a week. Dependencies: LuxRender, clinfo, clpeak, pocl, mesa. Updated SPEC and SRPM available at: https://fcami.fedorapeople.org/srpms/ocl-icd.spec https://fcami.fedorapeople.org/srpms/ocl-icd-2.2.3-1.git20141005.7cd0c2f.fc21.src.rpm

djvulibre/epel6 is no longer an orphan

Hi, I've taken over djvulibre/epel6 to avoid retiring the package. Co-maintainers are welcome. François -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct

Exception procedure: nonresponsive package maintainer

Hello, I 'd like an up-to-date disper build for EPEL6 and EPEL7. There are no EPEL branches for disper and the package is outdated (by ~18 months) in rawhide. I've opened a bug mentioning I can help maintaining the package with an updated srpm: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1143055

Re: Nonresponsive maintainers: Takanori Matsuura

Hello, On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 1:39 PM, Dmitrij S. Kryzhevich kr...@land.ru wrote: According to Policy for nonresponsive package maintainers. Takanori Matsuura did not respond on https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1105916, contact email is silent too. Moreover, his last build on

tinyxml2 API/ABI change

Hello, I will update tinyxml2 in a week in rawhide. cppcheck, dvblinkremote and libmediainfo will need to be rebuilt afterwards. As far as I can tell no change will be needed to rebuild at least the last two. A scratch build is available at:

Re: Take over Seth packages

Hi, On Fri, Aug 30, 2013 at 12:12 PM, Miroslav Suchý msu...@redhat.com wrote: pyliblzma -- Python bindings for lzma yum-utils -- Utilities based around the yum package manager If no one objects I'd like to take yum-utils and pyliblzma over. I'll be waiting for at least one +1 from a FESCo

Re: Take over Seth packages

On Fri, Aug 30, 2013 at 12:23 PM, Miroslav Suchý msu...@redhat.com wrote: On 08/30/2013 12:19 PM, François Cami wrote: I'll be waiting for at least one +1 from a FESCo member. Do not wait here. File FESCo ticket: https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/newticket Done. https://fedorahosted.org/fesco

Re: Take over Seth packages

On Fri, Aug 30, 2013 at 7:32 PM, Kevin Fenzi ke...@scrye.com wrote: I've orphaned the following: pyliblzma - all branched (fcami is going to take this) Taken, thank you Kevin. François -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

orphaning licq

Hello, I've orphaned licq in pkdg as I do not use it anymore. Cheers -- François -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct

orphaning ntop

Hello, I've orphaned ntop in pkdg. Cheers -- François -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct

enet soname change

Hi, I am going to switch enet.spec from using a version-generated soname to upstream's soname, so libenet-1.3.3.so will become libenet.so.2 (based on 1.3.8) in rawhide only. Packages depending on enet will (obviously) need a rebuild. Best regards, François -- devel mailing list

orphaning cal3d, freeimage, libosip2, linphone, opencv, osgal

Hello, I'm orphaning some packages: cal3d -- Skeletal based 3-D character animation library freeimage -- Multi-format image decoder library libosip2 -- oSIP is an implementation of SIP linphone -- Phone anywhere in the whole world by using the Internet opencv -- Collection of algorithms for

Re: Proposed F19 Feature: Apache OpenOffice

Hello, On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 1:44 PM, Jaroslav Reznik jrez...@redhat.com wrote: = Features/ApacheOpenOffice = https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/ApacheOpenOffice Feature owner(s): Andrea Pescetti pesce...@apache.org Add Apache OpenOffice, the free productivity suite, to Fedora. ==

Re: releasing ownership (maintainers/co-maintainers required)

Hello, On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 2:37 AM, Rakesh Pandit rakesh.pan...@gmail.com wrote: I'll take these if not accounted for already: djvulibre -- DjVu viewers, encoders, and utilities jed -- Fast, compact editor based on the S-Lang screen library libogg -- The Ogg bitstream file format library

Re: releasing ownership (maintainers/co-maintainers required)

On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 1:48 PM, Rakesh Pandit rakesh.pan...@gmail.com wrote: On 29 January 2013 11:27, Michael Schwendt mschwe...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, 29 Jan 2013 03:37:43 +0200, Rakesh Pandit wrote: freeimage -- Multi-format image decoder library This one is a mystery: 2009-05-21 (!)

Re: releasing ownership (maintainers/co-maintainers required)

On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 2:48 PM, Bruno Wolff III br...@wolff.to wrote: enet -- Thin, simple and robust network layer on top of UDP http://bugz.fedoraproject.org/enet There have been a few upstream releases. There are three co-maintainers for this already. @enet co-maintainers Anyone wants

Re: releasing ownership (maintainers/co-maintainers required)

On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 2:58 PM, Rakesh Pandit rakesh.pan...@gmail.com wrote: On 29 January 2013 15:51, François Cami wrote: On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 2:48 PM, Bruno Wolff III wrote: enet -- Thin, simple and robust network layer on top of UDP http://bugz.fedoraproject.org/enet There have been

Re: End of life in bugzilla, how to reopen?

On Tue, Dec 7, 2010 at 8:39 PM, Andreas Tunek andreas.tu...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, 2010-12-07 at 22:26 +0530, Siddhesh Poyarekar wrote: 4 as well (not F13), but I can not change the version. Do I have to file a new bug? I have reopened i So what kind of special access do you have to have

Re: old_testing_critpath notifications

On Wed, Dec 1, 2010 at 10:34 PM, Luke Macken lmac...@redhat.com wrote: On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 01:36:18PM +, Petr Pisar wrote: On 2010-11-29, Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com wrote: On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 9:56 AM, Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com wrote: Proven testers do get copies of

Re: old_testing_critpath notifications

On Thu, Dec 2, 2010 at 1:32 AM, Matt McCutchen m...@mattmccutchen.net wrote: On Wed, 2010-12-01 at 14:17 -0800, Adam Williamson wrote: When software is packaged it's reasonable to expect that someone, somewhere, uses it; if they don't, it probably shouldn't be packaged. We need to find those

Re: old_testing_critpath notifications

On Thu, Dec 2, 2010 at 6:03 PM, Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com wrote: On Thu, 2010-12-02 at 13:20 +0100, François Cami wrote: Of course, we could look at things differently: for a package to be marked critpath, it should have users or be a dependency of some other package with users

Re: old_testing_critpath notifications

On Thu, Dec 2, 2010 at 6:31 PM, Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com wrote: On Thu, 2010-12-02 at 18:20 +0100, François Cami wrote: On Thu, Dec 2, 2010 at 6:03 PM, Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com wrote: On Thu, 2010-12-02 at 13:20 +0100, François Cami wrote: Of course, we could look

Re: orphaning licq

On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 11:04 AM, Jiri Moskovcak jmosk...@redhat.com wrote: On 11/27/2010 12:15 AM, François Cami wrote: On Fri, Nov 26, 2010 at 1:51 PM, Jiri Moskovcakjmosk...@redhat.com  wrote: I'm no longer interested in this package, so I'm going to orphan in it. IMHO there is not much

Re: gnome-guitar in f14?

On Sat, Nov 27, 2010 at 11:54 AM, lakshminaras2...@gmail.com lakshminaras2...@gmail.com wrote: There is no gnome-guitar package in f14. Previous releases do have it. Any reasons why it has not been rebuilt for f14? Because it was orphaned and no one picked it up.

Re: orphaning licq

On Fri, Nov 26, 2010 at 1:51 PM, Jiri Moskovcak jmosk...@redhat.com wrote: I'm no longer interested in this package, so I'm going to orphan in it. IMHO there is not much users anyway, so how about removing it entirely? I'd like to take it if you orphan it, if you don't mind. François -- devel

Re: Plan for tomorrow's FESCo meeting (2010-11-17)

On Sun, Nov 21, 2010 at 4:19 AM, Kevin Kofler kevin.kof...@chello.at wrote: Adam Williamson wrote: I don't disagree with anything you say, but the question of what's more important than testing an update is key. If an update's worth doing, it's worth testing. This is pretty simple, and amply

Re: Plan for tomorrow's FESCo meeting (2010-11-17)

On Sat, Nov 20, 2010 at 5:44 PM, Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com wrote: On Sat, 2010-11-20 at 11:23 +0100, Till Maas wrote: On Fri, Nov 19, 2010 at 10:18:38PM -0800, Adam Williamson wrote: place. The idea was never that some magic independent group of testers would spend the rest of

Re: Updates Criteria Summary/Brainstorming

On Sat, Nov 20, 2010 at 11:35 PM, Kevin Fenzi ke...@scrye.com wrote: ok, I dug through the devel list for the last month or two and wrote down all the various ideas folks have come up with to change/improve things. Here (in no particular order) are the ideas and some notes from me on how we

Re: more updates discussion

On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 12:29 AM, Kevin Fenzi ke...@scrye.com wrote: On Wed, 17 Nov 2010 23:38:38 +0100 François Cami fdc-li...@fcami.net wrote: On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 11:04 PM, Kevin Kofler kevin.kof...@chello.at wrote: Kevin Fenzi wrote: So, there are no folks in the KDE sig using F13

Re: Fixing the glibc adobe flash incompatibility

On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 9:21 PM, Magnus Glantz m...@hacka.net wrote: On 11/17/2010 09:09 PM, Josh Boyer wrote: On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 2:28 PM, Bruno Wolff IIIbr...@wolff.to  wrote: On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 08:57:20 +0100,   Hans de Goedehdego...@redhat.com  wrote: For those who do not know

Re: Plan for tomorrow's FESCo meeting (2010-11-17)

On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 11:04 PM, Kevin Kofler kevin.kof...@chello.at wrote: Kevin Fenzi wrote: So, there are no folks in the KDE sig using F13 anymore? Perhaps call for testers in the users / kde lists? I think this issue goes far, far beyond just KDE. There are packages which have few

Re: Milmeister Mass-Orphaning Request

On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 7:12 PM, Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com wrote: On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 05:15:03PM +, Joel wrote: Michel Alexandre Salim salimma at fedoraproject.org wrote: We might need a mass-orphaning if Gérard cannot continue his Fedora work anymore. Paul Howarth paul

Re: The new Update Acceptance Criteria are broken

On Fri, Nov 12, 2010 at 9:14 PM, Kevin Fenzi ke...@scrye.com wrote: On Fri, 12 Nov 2010 14:54:28 -0500 Simo Sorce sso...@redhat.com wrote: Adam why should security updates wait at all ? Do you fear some packager will flag as security updates that are not ? Surely we can deal with such

Re: Orphaned package: system-config-display

On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 8:47 PM, Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com wrote: On Thu, 2010-08-26 at 13:32 -0500, Michael Cronenworth wrote: Kevin Kofler wrote: 3. What if you can't bring up X in the first place? (You can't run gnome- display-properties if you can't get into X.

Re: Orphaning all my packages

On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 4:19 AM, Ralf Corsepius rc040...@freenet.de wrote: On 08/12/2010 03:34 AM, Kevin Kofler wrote: Mike McGrath wrote: Luckily Remi got a list: http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2010-August/140708.html Unfortunately, Remi's list only covers php-*, I think