Workstation and Basic Video Driver - Provide way to switch to the normal driver?

2019-09-10 Thread Frantisek Zatloukal
Hi, recently, I've seen few users running Fedora with nomodeset. They didn't know about that and were just complaining about poor resolution and/or performance (and those systems worked just fine without nomodeset). Also, sometimes, users choose basic video driver because something is broken, but

Re: Drop of PlayOnLinux package (Rawhide)

2019-09-10 Thread Frantisek Zatloukal
Also, I have feeling that Lutris is far superior alternative, at least for games :) On Tue, Sep 10, 2019 at 4:01 PM Michael Cronenworth wrote: > On 9/10/19 8:35 AM, Miroslav Suchý wrote: > > This will lock me in the Steam only:) > > We ship wine-staging, which should handle any Windows game. >

Re: GNOME 3.33.92 megaupdate

2019-09-02 Thread Frantisek Zatloukal
I don't think it's that late for FE for F31 Beta, but this is something we can discuss on our meeting tomorrow. CCing Adam. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Fedora 32 System-Wide Change: glusterfs dropping 32-bit arches

2019-08-14 Thread Frantisek Zatloukal
> > > And that is sufficient. As long as it compiles, you can package it. > Whether > upstream "supports" it or not is irrelevant. It depends on package maintainer. If upstream dropped 32-bit support, I'd stop building it for that arch in Fedora. Why would package maintainer have to bear the

Re: Fedora 32 System-Wide Change proposal: x86-64 micro-architecture update

2019-07-31 Thread Frantisek Zatloukal
Personally, I am not at all against raising the bar for baseline x86_64. Of course, it'd be ideal to have some sort of derived x86_64_avx arch, but if we find out it'd require too much of an investment into infra/releng, I'd be +1 for just changing the base x86_64. Sure, it'd make sense to

wine/dxvk: Help with testing

2019-07-31 Thread Frantisek Zatloukal
Hi, I've proposed some packaging changes [0] to Fedora wine package. TLDR: It splits d3d libraries into subpackages and lays groundwork for future dxvk packaging [1]. Details are in the PR. *What is DXVK?* Vulkan-based D3D11 and D3D10 implementation for Linux / Wine. In short, you can replace

Re: Backport performance patches to mutter 3.32 from master branch

2019-07-21 Thread Frantisek Zatloukal
Hi, this is probably question for mutter/gnome-shell maintainers. But as I see it, there is a reason why are those patches not backported into stable branches in upstream. There can be regressions, the thing that you have zero issues doesn't mean anybody else won't have them. Backporting those

Re: Fedora 31 System-Wide Change proposal (late): No i686 Repositories

2019-07-15 Thread Frantisek Zatloukal
On Mon, Jul 15, 2019 at 11:58 AM Jiri Vanek wrote: > On 7/15/19 11:34 AM, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote: > > Hello, Dridi Boukelmoune. > > > > Mon, 15 Jul 2019 08:26:59 + you wrote: > > > >> Emulate as in not run natively even though the hardware might be able > to? > > > > Sorry for

Re: Fedora 31 System-Wide Change proposal: No More i686 Kernels

2019-06-25 Thread Frantisek Zatloukal
On Wed, Jun 26, 2019 at 12:17 AM Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski < domi...@greysector.net> wrote: > On Tuesday, 25 June 2019 at 14:36, Bruno Wolff III wrote: > > On Mon, Jun 24, 2019 at 23:17:30 -0500, > > Justin Forbes wrote: > > > > > > It is not a violent cheat. It was proposed this way 2

Re: Gating tests from tarball in Fedora - how to set up them?

2019-05-31 Thread Frantisek Zatloukal
On Fri, May 31, 2019 at 1:22 PM Jan Pazdziora wrote: > On Fri, May 31, 2019 at 12:53:35PM +0200, Jan Tulak wrote: > > Hi guys > > > > I'm trying to enable gating tests for package system-storage-manager. > > The tarball contains upstream tests and I would like to use these > > (with the ability

Re: F30 Self-Contained Change proposal: Bash 5.0

2019-01-25 Thread Frantisek Zatloukal
Why is this Self-Contained Change and not a System Wide Change? It seems, at least to me, that it should be System Wide Change, according to https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Policy#Complex_system_wide_changes . On Fri, Jan 25, 2019 at 3:45 PM Ben Cotton wrote: >

Re: Fedora Upgrade - release criteria update proposal

2018-11-18 Thread Frantisek Zatloukal
On Mon, Nov 19, 2018 at 6:43 AM Kevin Kofler wrote: > If you follow exactly this procedure, the set of "the multilib packages > installed before" will be empty and you will not reproduce the issue at > hand. Multilib cruft has not been installed by default for years now! (And > that is a good

Fedora Upgrade - release criteria update proposal

2018-11-18 Thread Frantisek Zatloukal
We have encountered a bug[0] which seemingly “broke” offline updates after systems were upgraded from an older Fedora to Fedora 29 and had some multilib packages installed. After the discussion at last week's Release Retrospective meeting, I am proposing some changes to our blocking criterions in

Re: rubygem-liquid update to 4.0.0

2018-05-14 Thread Frantisek Zatloukal
Hi Pavel, great, here it is: https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/rubygem-jekyll/pull-request/1 Thanks! On Thu, May 10, 2018 at 5:24 PM, Pavel Valena wrote: > - Original Message - > > From: "Fabio Valentini" > > To: "Development discussions

Re: rubygem-liquid update to 4.0.0

2018-05-07 Thread Frantisek Zatloukal
gem-jekyll.git/tree/rubygem-jekyll.spec On Mon, May 7, 2018 at 3:50 PM, Fabio Valentini <decatho...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Mon, May 7, 2018 at 3:29 PM Frantisek Zatloukal <fzatl...@redhat.com> > wrote: > > > Hi, > > I've tried to get updated rubygem-jekyll to fedora

Re: rubygem-liquid update to 4.0.0

2018-05-07 Thread Frantisek Zatloukal
Hi, I've tried to get updated rubygem-jekyll to fedora few months ago. It stalled on old liquid unfortunately[0]. I've been building new versions of rubygem-jekyll in my COPR[1] from time to time. [0] https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/frantisekz/fedora-developer-portal/ [1]

Re: Serious problem with SATA LPM in F28 on Lenovo 50 series laptops

2018-05-02 Thread Frantisek Zatloukal
Hans, can't this be affected also by different disk vendors (drive vendor in Lenovo laptop can vary even in same model) and different firmware of disks? Also, drive FW is upgradeable in Lenovo laptops. On Wed, May 2, 2018 at 5:39 PM, Hans de Goede wrote: > Hi, > > > On

Re: GNOME 3.25.92 megaupdate

2017-09-11 Thread Frantisek Zatloukal
Reported: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1490351 I am thinking about proposing this as Blocker Bug/PrioritizedBug, it's pretty significant regression compared to current state on Fedora 26. On Mon, Sep 11, 2017 at 1:06 PM, Kalev Lember wrote: > On

Re: Fedora Developer Portal as a application

2016-05-31 Thread Frantisek Zatloukal
websi...@lists.fedoraproject.org, "Frantisek Zatloukal" <fzatl...@redhat.com> Sent: Tuesday, May 31, 2016 4:46:20 PM Subject: Re: Fedora Developer Portal as a application Hi Petr and Frantisek, Are there future plans for developing this further, or is the goal just to have th