Re: Orphaning package procedure. (icewm, spring, springlobby)

2020-04-07 Thread Gilboa Davara
> Hello. Gilboa, i would like to continue maintaining IceWM. And i interesting > in 'springlobby' package. Please add me as co-maintainer. FAS: atim. Hello, Done. Please verify. - Gilboa ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To

Re: Orphaning package procedure. (icewm, spring, springlobby)

2020-04-07 Thread Gilboa Davara
On Mon, Apr 6, 2020 at 9:49 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > On Mon, Apr 06, 2020 at 04:59:14PM +0300, Gilboa Davara wrote: > > Hello, > > > > Due to the extreme time constraints that I'm forced to orphan most of my > > remaining packages. > > Namely icewm (which

Orphaning package procedure. (icewm, spring, springlobby)

2020-04-06 Thread Gilboa Davara
Hello, Due to the extreme time constraints that I'm forced to orphan most of my remaining packages. Namely icewm (which has an active co-maintainer), spring and springlobby. Following the procedure in wiki [1], I should use Pagure to orphan both packages. However, the list of projects in the

Re: F24: systemd fails to mount 128 LVM partitions. (udev issue?)

2016-07-28 Thread Gilboa Davara
On Thu, Jul 28, 2016 at 3:23 PM, Tomasz Torcz <to...@pipebreaker.pl> wrote: > On Thu, Jul 28, 2016 at 03:04:12PM +0300, Gilboa Davara wrote: >> On Thu, Jul 28, 2016 at 6:07 AM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek >> <zbys...@in.waw.pl> wrote: >> > >> > It i

Re: F24: systemd fails to mount 128 LVM partitions. (udev issue?)

2016-07-28 Thread Gilboa Davara
On Thu, Jul 28, 2016 at 9:59 AM, Lennart Poettering <mzerq...@0pointer.de> wrote: > On Wed, 27.07.16 21:35, Gilboa Davara (gilb...@gmail.com) wrote: > >> Hello all, >> >> I need help trying to debug a weird bug that I'm hitting. >> I've got a server with fair

Re: F24: systemd fails to mount 128 LVM partitions. (udev issue?)

2016-07-28 Thread Gilboa Davara
On Thu, Jul 28, 2016 at 6:07 AM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > > It is possible that udevd is failing for whatever reason... but apart > from the fact that some of the devices links are missing you don't > provide any info. At the minimum: boot logs, and information

F24: systemd fails to mount 128 LVM partitions. (udev issue?)

2016-07-27 Thread Gilboa Davara
Hello all, I need help trying to debug a weird bug that I'm hitting. I've got a server with fairly large storage (>100TB) that needs to handle very-small-files. Due to performance considerations I decided to split the large array into 128 ext4 partitions (rather than use a single xfs partition).

Re: ExclusiveArch: %{ix86} x86_64 ignored, SRPMs sent to arm builder?

2014-11-09 Thread Gilboa Davara
On Sat, Nov 8, 2014 at 4:41 PM, Dan Horák d...@danny.cz wrote: On Sat, 8 Nov 2014 16:35:39 +0200 Gilboa Davara gilb...@gmail.com wrote: Hello all, I'm trying to push a fresh build of spring. Currently spring upstream is limited to x86_64 and i686. The SPEC has ExclusiveArch: %{ix86} x86_64

ExclusiveArch: %{ix86} x86_64 ignored, SRPMs sent to arm builder?

2014-11-08 Thread Gilboa Davara
Hello all, I'm trying to push a fresh build of spring. Currently spring upstream is limited to x86_64 and i686. The SPEC has ExclusiveArch: %{ix86} x86_64 (following a suggestion from -devel ML), but never the less, its being sent to the ARM builder and fails. What am I doing wrong? - Gilboa --

https://pkgs.fedoraproject.org uses self-signed certificates?

2014-10-01 Thread Gilboa Davara
Hello all, When trying to download my package source files from pkgs.fedoraproject.org I'm getting self-signed SSL certificates (see details below). While it's most likely a minor infrastructure issue, I'd suggest exercising caution when downloading sources from pkgs.fedoraproject.org. I've also

Re: https://pkgs.fedoraproject.org uses self-signed certificates?

2014-10-01 Thread Gilboa Davara
On Wed, Oct 1, 2014 at 3:41 PM, Matthew Miller mat...@fedoraproject.org wrote: On Wed, Oct 01, 2014 at 03:02:34PM +0300, Gilboa Davara wrote: When trying to download my package source files from pkgs.fedoraproject.org I'm getting self-signed SSL certificates (see details below). While it's

Orphaning spring-install.

2013-11-21 Thread Gilboa Davara
Hello all, I'm orphaning spring-install. Up-stream is completely dead and currently its much easier to use the (actively maintained) springlobby client to download maps, etc. - Gilboa -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

ExcludeArch being ignored when building spring f20.

2013-11-20 Thread Gilboa Davara
Hello all, I'm facing a weird issue when trying to build a new version of spring. First and foremost, the spring.spec has ExcludeArch:ppc ppc64 %{arm}, which should exclude arm* and ppc* (both not supported by upstream). When trying to build F20, I got the following error: Building

Re: ExcludeArch being ignored when building spring f20.

2013-11-20 Thread Gilboa Davara
On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 5:26 PM, Josh Boyer jwbo...@fedoraproject.org wrote: On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 10:23 AM, Gilboa Davara gilb...@gmail.com wrote: Hello all, I'm facing a weird issue when trying to build a new version of spring. First and foremost, the spring.spec has ExcludeArch:ppc

Re: ExcludeArch being ignored when building spring f20.

2013-11-20 Thread Gilboa Davara
On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 5:55 PM, Dan Horák d...@danny.cz wrote: On Wed, 20 Nov 2013 17:23:33 +0200 Gilboa Davara gilb...@gmail.com wrote: Hello all, I'm facing a weird issue when trying to build a new version of spring. First and foremost, the spring.spec has ExcludeArch:ppc ppc64

Re: excellent work!

2013-07-09 Thread Gilboa Davara
On Wed, Jul 3, 2013 at 2:13 PM, Neal Becker ndbeck...@gmail.com wrote: Just want to say I updated 2 machines using fedup, and everything seems to have gone perfectly. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel I second the

Re: Weird broken deps.

2013-04-09 Thread Gilboa Davara
On Mon, Apr 8, 2013 at 8:00 PM, Michael Schwendt mschwe...@gmail.com wrote: On Mon, 8 Apr 2013 19:51:15 +0300, Gilboa Davara wrote: Hello all, Can anyone help me make sense of the following broken-dep message? springlobby has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree: On i386

Weird broken deps.

2013-04-08 Thread Gilboa Davara
Hello all, Can anyone help me make sense of the following broken-dep message? springlobby has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree: On i386: springlobby-0.169-2.fc20.i686 requires bdb835272157f37cbb0067c02ab4fc437596ed.debug springlobby-0.169-2.fc20.i686 requires

Re: Kernel panic Issue

2013-02-27 Thread Gilboa Davara
On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 1:00 PM, Darin Vivekananad didforsa...@gmail.com wrote: Kernel Panic Error and got demsg and shows like this. Can any one tell any issues with my machine Warning: dmesg info Linux version 2.6.17-1.2187_FC5smp (brewbuil...@hs20-bc2-2.build.redhat.com) (gcc version

Re: Kernel panic Issue

2013-02-27 Thread Gilboa Davara
On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 1:09 PM, Gilboa Davara gilb...@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 1:00 PM, Darin Vivekananad didforsa...@gmail.com wrote: Kernel Panic Error and got demsg and shows like this. Can any one tell any issues with my machine Warning: dmesg info Linux version

Re: Kernel panic Issue

2013-02-27 Thread Gilboa Davara
On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 1:20 PM, Darin Vivekananad didforsa...@gmail.com wrote: Dell poweedge 2900 Its an old machine running a very old and unsupported version of Linux. How frequent are these crashes? Once in while? every reboot? As far as I remember, back in the day the bnx drivers was

Re: Kernel panic Issue

2013-02-27 Thread Gilboa Davara
crashed. Any idea on NFS related panic error On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 4:44 PM, Gilboa Davara gilb...@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 1:09 PM, Gilboa Davara gilb...@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 1:00 PM, Darin Vivekananad didforsa...@gmail.com wrote: Kernel Panic Error

Re: Heads up: glew 1.9.0 coming to F19

2012-12-16 Thread Gilboa Davara
On Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 2:01 AM, Adam Jackson a...@redhat.com wrote: spring-91.0-1.fc18.src.rpm Failed to build, but not my fault: /lib64/libIrrXML.so.1: undefined reference to `irr::core::LOCALE_DECIMAL_POINTS' collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status Everything else rebuilt fine.

Re: Fedora 18 Beta to slip by two weeks, Beta release date is now Nov 27

2012-11-07 Thread Gilboa Davara
On Thu, Nov 8, 2012 at 5:55 AM, Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com wrote: On Wed, 2012-11-07 at 21:07 -0600, Conan Kudo (ニール・ゴンパ) wrote: Oh my goodness. This is the highest amount of slippage I've seen in quite some time. What is wrong with Fedora? The new anaconda UI and related features

Re: Replacing grubby with grub2-mkconfig in kernel install process

2012-06-18 Thread Gilboa Davara
On Sun, Jun 17, 2012 at 4:40 PM, Andre Robatino robat...@fedoraproject.org wrote: Ben Rosser rosser.bjr at gmail.com writes: It seems to me that we should make the boot menu more consistent somehow. I feel like the simplest solution is just to run grub2-mkconfig at every kernel update, and

Re: Xfce 4.10pre1 in rawhide

2012-04-03 Thread Gilboa Davara
On Sun, Apr 1, 2012 at 11:12 PM, Kevin Fenzi ke...@scrye.com wrote: greetings. Xfce 4.10pre1 is out... and I am going to look at landing it in rawhide in the next few days. Hopefully there won't be too much disruption caused by this (it's 17 packages), just wanted to give rawhide Xfce

Re: Xfce 4.10pre1 in rawhide

2012-04-03 Thread Gilboa Davara
On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 9:55 AM, Frank Murphy frankl...@gmail.com wrote: On 03/04/12 07:52, Gilboa Davara wrote: Any chance of building a personal repository for F17 or better yet, F16? - Gilboa https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/xfce/2012-April/001082.html The feature page doesn't

Re: Xfce 4.10pre1 in rawhide

2012-04-03 Thread Gilboa Davara
On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 10:31 AM, Frank Murphy frankl...@gmail.com wrote: Hence my reply. *Sigh* - Gilboa -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Bodhi problems?

2012-03-04 Thread Gilboa Davara
Hello all, Since 06:00 UTC time, I've been trying to get a new icewm build (el5/6,fc15/16) out of the door and facing a barrage of uninformative error codes, ranging from 500 Internal error, build was not tagged to simple empty page. In the end, I gave on on trying to push the 4 build

Re: PA 1.0 for FC16?

2011-10-10 Thread Gilboa Davara
On Sat, Oct 8, 2011 at 10:36 PM, Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com wrote: On Sat, Oct 8, 2011 at 2:43 PM, Gilboa Davara gilb...@gmail.com wrote: Hello all, Short question: PA 1.0 was released ~1 month ago. According to the wine developers, the updated mmdevapi layer (the wine layer

Re: PA 1.0 for FC16?

2011-10-10 Thread Gilboa Davara
On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 6:39 PM, Lennart Poettering mzerq...@0pointer.de wrote: On Sat, 08.10.11 18:08, Gilboa Davara (gilb...@gmail.com) wrote: I might be completely off target on this one, but assuming that the information I've gathered thus far is correct, read: assuming that wine

PA 1.0 for FC16?

2011-10-08 Thread Gilboa Davara
Hello all, Short question: PA 1.0 was released ~1 month ago. According to the wine developers, the updated mmdevapi layer (the wine layer that emulates the Windows sound system) more-or-less requires current PA (1.0?) to work reliably. [1] For now, sound is completely broken under wine on any of

Re: PA 1.0 for FC16?

2011-10-08 Thread Gilboa Davara
On Sat, Oct 8, 2011 at 3:48 PM, Lennart Poettering mzerq...@0pointer.de wrote: On Sat, 08.10.11 15:43, Gilboa Davara (gilb...@gmail.com) wrote: Hello all, Short question: PA 1.0 was released ~1 month ago. It was released 12 days ago. My mistake. According to the wine developers

Re: PA 1.0 for FC16?

2011-10-08 Thread Gilboa Davara
On Sat, Oct 8, 2011 at 7:04 PM, Rex Dieter rdie...@math.unl.edu wrote: I might be completely off target on this one, but assuming that the information I've gathered thus far is correct, read: assuming that wine *requires* PA 1.0 to work reliably, will it possible to push PA 1.0 as a post

Re: koji: kernel-2.6.40-3.fc15

2011-07-30 Thread Gilboa Davara
On Fri, 2011-07-29 at 13:53 +0200, Reindl Harald wrote: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=256138 does this mean that F15 will get a rebased 2.6.40 sooner or later in stable repos to avoid troubles with the new versioning and will not stuck at 2.6.38 the whole life cycle?

Orphaning iDesk

2011-07-13 Thread Gilboa Davara
Hello all, I've orphaned idesk. Upstream is long dead and I'm currently do not have the necessary free time to get it to work under Fedora 15. - Gilboa -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: F15 / VirtualBox

2011-06-13 Thread Gilboa Davara
On Mon, 2011-06-13 at 10:25 +0200, Vít Ondruch wrote: Dne 11.6.2011 16:21, Gilboa Davara napsal(a): On Fri, 2011-06-10 at 16:25 +0100, Tom Hughes wrote: On 10/06/11 16:12, Michael Cronenworth wrote: Richard W.M. Jones wrote: They are available, but I think you have to build

Re: F15 / VirtualBox

2011-06-11 Thread Gilboa Davara
On Fri, 2011-06-10 at 16:25 +0100, Tom Hughes wrote: On 10/06/11 16:12, Michael Cronenworth wrote: Richard W.M. Jones wrote: They are available, but I think you have to build them yourself from source. All the information is here: 2. Make guest additions dead simple to install.

Re: F15 / VirtualBox

2011-06-11 Thread Gilboa Davara
1. Easy setup of networking (bridged). Just to followup, to setup bridged net on kvm I need to reboot my server. That's a non-starter. And long as you're will to do the hard work yourself, there's no need to reboot your machine. 1. Create a bridge configuration for each target network

gpk-update-icon replacement under XFCE and other alternative DEs.

2011-05-29 Thread Gilboa Davara
Hello all, I've upgrade my netbook from F14 to F15. The netbook is running XFCE 4.8. Previously, in F14, gpk-update-icon was responsible for display an alert when updates are available. As far as I can see, gpk-update-icon is no longer available in gnome-packagekit and according to yum it's no

Re: gpk-update-icon replacement under XFCE and other alternative DEs.

2011-05-29 Thread Gilboa Davara
On Sun, 2011-05-29 at 11:06 +0100, Frank Murphy wrote: /usr/bin/gpk-prefs As far as I can see, gpk-prefs only handles the gpk configuration and cannot be used as a alert icon. - Gilboa -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: gpk-update-icon replacement under XFCE and other alternative DEs.

2011-05-29 Thread Gilboa Davara
On Sun, 2011-05-29 at 11:48 +0100, Frank Murphy wrote: On 29/05/11 11:24, Gilboa Davara wrote: On Sun, 2011-05-29 at 11:06 +0100, Frank Murphy wrote: /usr/bin/gpk-prefs As far as I can see, gpk-prefs only handles the gpk configuration and cannot be used as a alert icon. - Gilboa

Re: Delayed encrypted partition mount

2011-04-02 Thread Gilboa Davara
On Mon, 2011-03-28 at 16:23 +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote: On Mon, 21.03.11 09:35, Bruno Wolff III (br...@wolff.to) wrote: On Mon, Mar 21, 2011 at 16:22:59 +0200, Gilboa Davara gilb...@gmail.com wrote: My question is simple: Given the fact that I rarely encrypt the root

Re: ixgbe/udev mystery

2011-03-26 Thread Gilboa Davara
On Fri, 2011-03-25 at 19:01 +0100, Thomas Bendler wrote: 2011/3/25 Thomas Bendler m...@bendler-net.de [...] One remark, the error occured with the standard ixgbe module (2.0.62-k2), so I upgraded the module to the latest version (3.2.10-NAPI) but

Re: Delayed encrypted partition mount

2011-03-23 Thread Gilboa Davara
On Mon, 2011-03-21 at 15:32 -0400, Gregory Maxwell wrote: On Mon, Mar 21, 2011 at 10:22 AM, Gilboa Davara gilb...@gmail.com wrote: Hello all, I routinely encrypt all important partitions on my laptops / workstations / servers using LUKS both at home and at work. However, due

Delayed encrypted partition mount

2011-03-21 Thread Gilboa Davara
Hello all, I routinely encrypt all important partitions on my laptops / workstations / servers using LUKS both at home and at work. However, due to the above, I can no longer remotely reboot the machines (at least the ones that doesn't have a serial console attached) as I'm required to baby-sit

Re: Delayed encrypted partition mount

2011-03-21 Thread Gilboa Davara
On Mon, 2011-03-21 at 09:35 -0500, Bruno Wolff III wrote: On Mon, Mar 21, 2011 at 16:22:59 +0200, Gilboa Davara gilb...@gmail.com wrote: My question is simple: Given the fact that I rarely encrypt the root, can I somehow delay the encrypted partition mount to right-before-gdm, so all

Re: Retired package by mistake - undo?

2010-12-16 Thread Gilboa Davara
On Wed, 2010-12-15 at 07:43 -0800, Toshio Kuratomi wrote: On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 04:21:35PM +0200, Gilboa Davara wrote: On Tue, 2010-12-14 at 08:19 -0600, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote: OK, I found spring-installer and unretired it as well. You should log into pkgdb and claim both packages

Nonreponsive maintainer for atop: Kairo Francisco de Araujo

2010-12-14 Thread Gilboa Davara
Hello all, Following the nonresponsive package maintainers policy, a new version of atop has been released a couple of months ago but never made it into Fedora, bug report filed (+patch, [1]) 3 weeks ago. Other open bug listed below. [2,3] - Gilboa [1]

Retired package by mistake - undo?

2010-12-14 Thread Gilboa Davara
Hello all, While the click-frenzy required to take ownership over spring and its sub packages I mistakably retired spring-maps-default / devel and spring-install / devel. I tried to unretire them both, but failed. Admins, help? - Gilboa -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Retired package by mistake - undo?

2010-12-14 Thread Gilboa Davara
On Tue, 2010-12-14 at 08:19 -0600, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote: OK, I found spring-installer and unretired it as well. You should log into pkgdb and claim both packages as they're currently orphaned. - J Thanks! - Gilboa -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Testing Xfce 4.8 pre 2 packages available

2010-12-06 Thread Gilboa Davara
On Mon, 2010-12-06 at 00:01 +0100, Christoph Wickert wrote: Hi there, I have packaged Xfce 4-8 pre 2 for Fedora 14 and Rawhide. You can find the packages at http://repos.fedorapeople.org/repos/cwickert/xfce-4.8/ The repo is far from complete. ATM it is still rsyncing and Fedora 13 is

Re: OO updates - no presto support?

2010-12-05 Thread Gilboa Davara
On Sat, 2010-12-04 at 19:00 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote: On 12/04/2010 06:54 PM, Gilboa Davara wrote: Hello all, I've noticed that since the release of F14 a fairly large [1] number of OO updates came down the wire - non of them in deltarpm/presto form (read: a 100MB download per

OO updates - no presto support?

2010-12-04 Thread Gilboa Davara
Hello all, I've noticed that since the release of F14 a fairly large [1] number of OO updates came down the wire - non of them in deltarpm/presto form (read: a 100MB download per release). Is it bug or intended behavior? If its a bug, wouldn't it be wise to hold off on releasing

Re: sched_autogroup interactivity patch for the desktop

2010-11-18 Thread Gilboa Davara
On Tue, 2010-11-16 at 11:39 -0500, Kyle McMartin wrote: On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 04:58:11PM +0100, Ilyes Gouta wrote: Can we have this patch back ported into the current kernel for Fedora 14 and possibly posted as an update? :) Would be wonderful! Try this,

Re: Ubuntu 10.10's installer looks rather nice

2010-10-14 Thread Gilboa Davara
On Wed, 2010-10-13 at 23:51 +0200, Ralf Ertzinger wrote: Hi. On Wed, 13 Oct 2010 22:26:18 +0200, Gilboa Davara wrote As you pointed out, different drives, can have more-or-less identical partition size, with different CHS in the partition table. I my experience the hard disk vendors

Re: Ubuntu 10.10's installer looks rather nice

2010-10-13 Thread Gilboa Davara
On Tue, 2010-10-12 at 18:18 +0100, Evan Dandrea wrote: The Ubuntu installer does let you use a NFS root for your installation source. On the point of needing something more complex, such as LVM or full disk encryption, that's what we offer our alternate CD installer (debian-installer) for.

Re: Ubuntu 10.10's installer looks rather nice

2010-10-13 Thread Gilboa Davara
Hello, I am doing the same setup, nice to see someone else with those requirements. actually without kickstart setting up softraid in anaconda was broken (try it manually without precreated partitions... it will drive you insane). out of the box booting didnt work when /boot was on a

Re: Ubuntu 10.10's installer looks rather nice

2010-10-13 Thread Gilboa Davara
, same batch, same day, etc) As you pointed out, different drives, can have more-or-less identical partition size, with different CHS in the partition table. As I don't trust myself to use the -right- size every time (446 vs 512), I simply assume the worse. -- Gilboa Davara http://www.wirex

Re: Ubuntu 10.10's installer looks rather nice

2010-10-11 Thread Gilboa Davara
On Mon, 2010-10-11 at 11:41 +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: I installed and played with Ubuntu 10.10 over the weekend (in a VM), and I have to say that their installer is very smooth indeed. It's starting to make anaconda look distinctly clunky. Some of the things it does which are IMHO

Re: Ubuntu 10.10's installer looks rather nice

2010-10-11 Thread Gilboa Davara
On Mon, 2010-10-11 at 12:09 -0400, Jon Masters wrote: On Mon, 2010-10-11 at 17:39 +0200, Gilboa Davara wrote: Comparing the Ubuntu 10.04 DVD installer (which I use a couple of weeks ago) to Fedora 13 DVD installer is like comparing the Cessna to a Boeing 747. Sure, both can accomplish

Re: Increase grub timeout

2010-05-15 Thread Gilboa Davara
On Sat, 2010-05-15 at 11:01 +0200, Richard Zidlicky wrote: On Sat, May 15, 2010 at 09:58:27AM +0200, Alexander Boström wrote: Long story short: There are situations where a grub menu is vital, like until you've successfully booted a new kernel. of course, and I do not think it is so hard

Re: Increase grub timeout

2010-05-15 Thread Gilboa Davara
On Sat, 2010-05-15 at 12:19 +0300, Gilboa Davara wrote: On Sat, 2010-05-15 at 11:01 +0200, Richard Zidlicky wrote: On Sat, May 15, 2010 at 09:58:27AM +0200, Alexander Boström wrote: Long story short: There are situations where a grub menu is vital, like until you've successfully booted

Re: Reasons for hall monitoring

2010-05-11 Thread Gilboa Davara
On Mon, 2010-05-10 at 16:19 -0700, Jesse Keating wrote: Let me reverse the question: How did they gather the community input? From whom it was gathered? What was the question? What was the answer? - Gilboa Most likely by reading or participating in the various threads on

Re: Realtek 8192se on F12/F13

2010-05-10 Thread Gilboa Davara
On Mon, 2010-05-10 at 12:38 +0200, Jos Vos wrote: Hi, What is the status of support for the Realtek 8192se WiFi controller in F12 and F13? I see in some wiki page a reference to the Realtek website, at least for (stock) F12. Is this chipset in the meantime supported in the F12 kernel

Re: Reasons for hall monitoring

2010-05-10 Thread Gilboa Davara
On Mon, 2010-05-10 at 11:05 -0700, Jesse Keating wrote: On Mon, 2010-05-10 at 07:28 +0300, Gilboa Davara wrote: I do not agree that that working with zero community input is the way to achieve a working compromise. (And input does not equal vote) What makes you think that no community

Re: Reasons for hall monitoring

2010-05-09 Thread Gilboa Davara
On Sun, 2010-05-09 at 11:09 +0100, Adam Williamson wrote: I'm tempted to agree in practice with Matej that it is. I don't think we can kid ourselves that we're doing a particularly good job of making a desktop for end users; if we were, we wouldn't be being trashed by Ubuntu in this area (let

Re: Reasons for hall monitoring

2010-05-09 Thread Gilboa Davara
On Sun, 2010-05-09 at 15:27 -0500, Mike McGrath wrote: If you think we should vote, go join debian. I think they do that there. First, I never said we should 'vote'. I talked about community involvement. Second, if you are looking at the sure path to drive people away, sending them to go join

Re: Proposed udpates policy change

2010-03-10 Thread Gilboa Davara
On Wed, 2010-03-10 at 13:21 -0800, Adam Williamson wrote: On Wed, 2010-03-10 at 23:11 +0200, Gilboa Davara wrote: Either we (package maintainers) are qualified to make sane decisions about our package or we are not. I don't really see a middle ground here. Being qualified to do

Missing multi-lib -debuginfo files.

2010-01-17 Thread Gilboa Davara
Hello all, I'm trying to debug an issue with 32bit application running on top of x86_64 F12 installation. (Using multi-lib i686 RPMs) However, debuginfo install doesn't seem to be able to resolve i686 debuginfo. $ debuginfo-install alsa-lib.i686 alsa-plugins-pulseaudio.i686 dbus-libs.i686

Re: Missing multi-lib -debuginfo files.

2010-01-17 Thread Gilboa Davara
On Sun, 2010-01-17 at 14:18 +0100, Björn Persson wrote: Gilboa Davara wrote: I'm trying to debug an issue with 32bit application running on top of x86_64 F12 installation. (Using multi-lib i686 RPMs) However, debuginfo install doesn't seem to be able to resolve i686 debuginfo. That's