Re: TPMs, measured boot and remote attestation in Fedora

On 08.04.2016 18:56, Matthew Garrett wrote: > On Fri, Apr 08, 2016 at 09:23:07AM +, Petr Pisar wrote: > >> I'm curious how you would predict hash of initramfs because it is >> generated on the host and depends on dracut configuration and presence >> of various optionally installed packages. >

Re: Easier %config management?

ld output to which package the file in /usr/etc belongs. Also the %config(noreplace) attribute has to be removed from the pristine config files. Attached is a quick hack to rpm I have done for experimenting with that feature. From 1eb125dd814a08b0a8bfd5e4ab95d38525caf5d3 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Har

Re: no systemd in containers: Requires -> Recommends

On 17.12.2015 11:15, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote: >>>>>> "HH" == Harald Hoyer <har...@redhat.com> writes: > > HH> To improve the situation, we could make use of the new rpm weak > HH> dependencies. So the > > I'm not sure I see the point. T

Re: F24 System Wide Change: Default Local DNS Resolver

On 07.12.2015 20:57, Paul Wouters wrote: > On Mon, 7 Dec 2015, Matthew Miller wrote: > >> I read your whole post. Those possibilities seem pretty limited, from >> the point of view of serious regressions in Fedora usability. It isn't >> that I "like" Fedora being less than technically correct

no systemd in containers: Requires -> Recommends

For docker containers, or containers, which don't want systemd, the current "Requires: systemd" in a lot of packages is preventing building a minimal image. To improve the situation, we could make use of the new rpm weak dependencies. So the Requires(post): systemd Requires(preun): systemd

Re: Using guestfish inside mock?

On 16.12.2015 00:19, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > Cc-ing to Fedora devel list. > > This is related to why you have to install 'grubby' in order for mock > to have a /boot/vmlinuz-* kernel. Another thing we have to work > around in libguestfs: > >

Re: Unexpected NIC naming f23 firewall implications

Am 08.11.2015 um 20:29 schrieb Richard W.M. Jones: > On Sat, Nov 07, 2015 at 05:28:54PM +, Christopher wrote: >> I recently updated my desktop to f23, and it went smoothly, for the most >> part. However, it broke my mediatomb server because the NIC changed from >> em1 to eno1. >> >> Is this

Re: Unexpected NIC naming f23 firewall implications

Am 08.11.2015 um 17:14 schrieb Björn Persson: > Christopher wrote: >> I recently updated my desktop to f23, and it went smoothly, for the most >> part. However, it broke my mediatomb server because the NIC changed from >> em1 to eno1. > > On any computer where it

Re: Fedora 23 cloud image (and, for that matter, minimal anything) bloat

Am 21.09.2015 um 11:07 schrieb Matthew Miller: > Fedora-Cloud-Base-20141203-21.x86_64.qcow2: 151M > Fedora-Cloud-Base-23_Beta-20150915.x86_64.qcow2: 275M > > In just one year — 82% more awesome? > > I'd really like this to stay below 200MB as a competitive threshold. > Or, if we're

[Base] Base Design WG agenda meeting September, 14th 2015 14:15 UTC on #fedora-meeting-2

Agenda: - Fedora.Base - RHEL.Base - Flock recap (continued) - Ring 1 vs Ring 0 (continued) - define the minimal install (continued) - define the docker base image (continued) - minimal disk image for importing into libvirt (continued) - generic installer? (continued) - Open Floor Please add

Re: [Base] Base Design WG agenda meeting September, 14th 2015 14:15 UTC on #fedora-meeting-2

On 14.09.2015 15:33, Harald Hoyer wrote: > Agenda: > > - Fedora.Base - RHEL.Base - Flock recap (continued) > - Ring 1 vs Ring 0 (continued) > - define the minimal install (continued) > - define the docker base image (continued) > - minimal disk image for importing in

Re: [Base] Base Design WG agenda meeting September, 7th 2015 14:15 UTC on #fedora-meeting-2

On 07.09.2015 15:11, Jaroslav Reznik wrote: > On Mon, Sep 7, 2015 at 3:04 PM, Harald Hoyer <harald.ho...@gmail.com> wrote: >> Agenda: >> >> - Fedora.Base - RHEL.Base - Flock recap (continued) >> - Ring 1 vs Ring 0 (continued) >> - define the minimal ins

[Base] Base Design WG agenda meeting September, 7th 2015 14:15 UTC on #fedora-meeting-2

Agenda: - Fedora.Base - RHEL.Base - Flock recap (continued) - Ring 1 vs Ring 0 (continued) - define the minimal install (continued) - define the docker base image (continued) - minimal disk image for importing into libvirt (continued) - generic installer? (continued) - Open Floor Please add

Re: [Base] Base Design WG agenda meeting August, 31st 2015 14:15 UTC on #fedora-meeting-2

On 27.08.2015 14:36, Harald Hoyer wrote: > Agenda: > > - Fedora.Base - RHEL.Base - Flock recap > - Ring 1 vs Ring 0 > - define the minimal install (continued) > - define the docker base image (continued) > - minimal disk image for importing into libvirt (continued)

[Base] Base Design WG agenda meeting August, 31st 2015 14:15 UTC on #fedora-meeting-2

Agenda: - Fedora.Base - RHEL.Base - Flock recap - Ring 1 vs Ring 0 - define the minimal install (continued) - define the docker base image (continued) - minimal disk image for importing into libvirt (continued) - generic installer? (continued) - Open Floor Please add items by replying to this

[Base] No Base Design WG meeting today

Ssia -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct

dnf distro-sync oddities

Correct me, if I am doing s.th. wrong, but # dnf distro-sync --allowerasing […] Installing: […] Upgrading: Removing: […] kernel x86_64 4.2.0-0.rc4.git1.2.fc24 @System 0 kernel x86_64 4.2.0-0.rc4.git4.2.fc24 @System 0 kernel

[Base] No Base Design WG meeting today

SSIA -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct

[Base] Base Design WG agenda meeting August, 3rd 2015 14:15 UTC on #fedora-meeting-2

Agenda: - define the minimal install (continued) - define the docker base image (continued) - minimal disk image for importing into libvirt (continued) - generic installer? (continued) - Open Floor Please add items by replying to this mail. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: [HEADS-UP] Please test kdbus in Rawhide!

On 30.07.2015 20:05, Stephen Gallagher wrote: On Thu, 2015-07-30 at 19:57 +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote: Heya! I'd like to ask everybody to test kdbus on Rawhide. Josh thankfully added it to the Rawhide kernel packages, and our systemd RPMs come with built-in support, too now. If you are

Re: Fedora minimal installations

On 29.07.2015 18:29, Michael Schwendt wrote: On Wed, 29 Jul 2015 12:24:17 -0400, Matthew Miller wrote: On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 02:09:02PM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: A couple of strange deps: - libsemanage requires python (filed as

Re: Fedora minimal installations

On 29.07.2015 16:09, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 03:42:28PM +0200, Harald Hoyer wrote: In order to define the Base WG core package group and minimize minimal installations for e.g. cloud images and the atomic spin, I created some dependency lists: There are so

Re: Fedora minimal installations

Am 29.07.2015 21:44 schrieb Adam Jackson a...@redhat.com: On Wed, 2015-07-29 at 21:17 +0200, Harald Hoyer wrote: Well, then why not ship the udev rules with device-mapper instead of the libs? I don't understand the question. They _are_ shipped in device-mapper. Then I don't get

Re: Fedora minimal installations

Am 29.07.2015 20:33 schrieb Adam Jackson a...@redhat.com: On Wed, 2015-07-29 at 15:42 +0200, Harald Hoyer wrote: - krb5-libs requires gawk - why do libs require utils other than ldconfig? This looks like it was originally a Requires(triggerun) for the configure_default_ccache_name case

Re: Fedora minimal installations

Am 29.07.2015 23:26 schrieb Adam Jackson a...@redhat.com: On Wed, 2015-07-29 at 21:48 +0200, Harald Hoyer wrote: Then I don't get the argument of the libs requiring device-mapper. /me is puzzled. The changelog message sort of implies the libs contain code that doesn't work unless

Fedora minimal installations

In order to define the Base WG core package group and minimize minimal installations for e.g. cloud images and the atomic spin, I created some dependency lists: There are so many definitions of minimum sets: systemd: container boot systemd + bash + login: container boot with login systemd +

[Base] Base Design WG agenda meeting 27th July 2015 14:15 UTC on #fedora-meeting-2

Agenda: - define the minimal install (continued) - define the docker base image (continued) - minimal disk image for importing into libvirt (continued) - generic installer? (continued) - Open Floor Please add items by replying to this mail. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: [Base] Base Design WG agenda meeting 27th July 2015 14:15 UTC on #fedora-meeting-2

On 27.07.2015 13:28, Harald Hoyer wrote: Agenda: - define the minimal install (continued) - define the docker base image (continued) - minimal disk image for importing into libvirt (continued) - generic installer? (continued) - Open Floor Please add items by replying to this mail

Re: Base Design WG agenda meeting 20th June 2015 14:15 UTC on #fedora-meeting-2

On 13.07.2015 16:40, Harald Hoyer wrote: Agenda: - define the minimal install - define the docker base image - minimal disk image for importing into libvirt - generic installer? - Open Floor Please add items by replying to this mail. Minutes: http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora

Re: [HEADS UP] dracut-live subpackage

Forgot to mention.. This is rawhide only. John Florian john.flor...@dart.biz schrieb am Mi., 15. Juli 2015 14:39: From: devel-boun...@lists.fedoraproject.org [mailto:devel- boun...@lists.fedoraproject.org] On Behalf Of Harald Hoyer Sent: Friday, July 10, 2015 05:31 To: Development

Re: Base Design WG agenda meeting 20th July 2015 14:15 UTC on #fedora-meeting-2

On 13.07.2015 16:40, Harald Hoyer wrote: Agenda: - define the minimal install - define the docker base image - minimal disk image for importing into libvirt - generic installer? - Open Floor Please add items by replying to this mail. s/June/July/g of course :-) -- devel mailing list

Base Design WG agenda meeting 20th June 2015 14:15 UTC on #fedora-meeting-2

Agenda: - define the minimal install - define the docker base image - minimal disk image for importing into libvirt - generic installer? - Open Floor Please add items by replying to this mail. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[HEADS UP] dracut-live subpackage

dracut now has a new subpackage dracut-live which is needed to boot live images with dmsquash. Please add this package to your dependencies. Thanks! -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct:

Re: [Base] Base Design WG agenda meeting 29st June 2015 14:15 UTC on #fedora-meeting-2

On 26.06.2015 11:33, Harald Hoyer wrote: Agenda: - Interview potential candidates for new memberships - Optionally accept new members - readonly root - plan to get rid of fedora-readonly? drop in favor of http://0pointer.net/blog/projects/stateless.html - Open Floor Please add

[Base] Base Design WG agenda meeting 29st June 2015 14:15 UTC on #fedora-meeting-2

Agenda: - Interview potential candidates for new memberships - Optionally accept new members - readonly root - plan to get rid of fedora-readonly? drop in favor of http://0pointer.net/blog/projects/stateless.html - Open Floor Please add items by replying to this mail. -- devel mailing

[Base] Base Design WG agenda meeting 8st June 2015 14:15 UTC on #fedora-meeting-2

*IMPORTANT*: #fedora-meeting-2 ... I repeat: *two* Agenda: - Interview candidates for new memberships - Optionally accept new members - Status - Docker - Status - BuildRequires - Open Floor Please add items by replying to this mail. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: [Base] Base Design WG agenda meeting 8st June 2015 14:15 UTC on #fedora-meeting-2

On 08.06.2015 10:29, Harald Hoyer wrote: *IMPORTANT*: #fedora-meeting-2 ... I repeat: *two* Agenda: - Interview candidates for new memberships - Optionally accept new members - Status - Docker - Status - BuildRequires - Open Floor Please add items by replying to this mail

[Base] Base Design WG agenda meeting 1st June 2015 14:15 UTC on #fedora-meeting-2

*IMPORTANT*: #fedora-meeting-2 ... I repeat: *two* Agenda: - Interview candidates for new memberships - Optionally accept new members - Open Floor Please add items by replying to this mail. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: [Base] Base Design WG agenda meeting 1st June 2015 14:15 UTC on #fedora-meeting-2

On 01.06.2015 10:50, Harald Hoyer wrote: *IMPORTANT*: #fedora-meeting-2 ... I repeat: *two* Agenda: - Interview candidates for new memberships - Optionally accept new members - Open Floor Please add items by replying to this mail. Minutes: http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora

Re: [Base] Base Design WG agenda meeting 20 March 2015 14:00 UTC on #fedora-meeting

On 19.03.2015 13:37, Harald Hoyer wrote: THIS TIME at 14:00 UTC because of US summer time. Agenda: - Interview candidates for new memberships - Optionally accept new members - Open Floor Please add items by replying to this mail. Minutes: http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora

[Base] Base Design WG agenda meeting 20 March 2015 14:00 UTC on #fedora-meeting

THIS TIME at 14:00 UTC because of US summer time. Agenda: - Interview candidates for new memberships - Optionally accept new members - Open Floor Please add items by replying to this mail. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: [Base] Base Design WG agenda meeting 6 March 2015 14:00 UTC on #fedora-meeting

On 05.03.2015 20:08, Stephen Gallagher wrote: On Thu, 2015-03-05 at 12:50 +0100, Harald Hoyer wrote: THIS TIME at 14:00 UTC because of US summer time. US doesn't go into Daylight Savings Time until Sunday, FYI. Yeah, my bad... anyway, I would like to stick with that time for today

Re: [Base] Base Design WG agenda meeting 6 March 2015 14:00 UTC on #fedora-meeting

On 05.03.2015 16:56, Dennis Gilmore wrote: DST starts in the us on Sunday march 8.On Mar 5, 2015 5:50 AM, Harald Hoyer har...@redhat.com wrote: THIS TIME at 14:00 UTC because of US summer time. Agenda: - Interview candidates for new memberships - Optionally accept new members - Open

Re: [Base] Base Design WG agenda meeting 6 March 2015 14:00 UTC on #fedora-meeting

On 05.03.2015 16:56, Dennis Gilmore wrote: DST starts in the us on Sunday march 8.On Mar 5, 2015 5:50 AM, Harald Hoyer har...@redhat.com wrote: THIS TIME at 14:00 UTC because of US summer time. Agenda: - Interview candidates for new memberships - Optionally accept new members - Open

[Base] Base Design WG agenda meeting 6 March 2015 14:00 UTC on #fedora-meeting

THIS TIME at 14:00 UTC because of US summer time. Agenda: - Interview candidates for new memberships - Optionally accept new members - Open Floor Please add items by replying to this mail. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: [Base] Base Design WG agenda meeting 27 February 2015 15:00 UTC on #fedora-meeting

On 26.02.2015 13:02, Harald Hoyer wrote: Agenda: - Interview candidates for new memberships - Optionally accept new members - Vote for new chairman of the Base Design WG to replace Phil Knirsch - Open Floor Please add items by replying to this mail. Minutes: http

[Base] Base Design WG agenda meeting 27 February 2015 15:00 UTC on #fedora-meeting

Agenda: - Interview candidates for new memberships - Optionally accept new members - Vote for new chairman of the Base Design WG to replace Phil Knirsch - Open Floor Please add items by replying to this mail. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Looking for new Members - Fedora Base Design Working Group

Hi folks, the Fedora Base Design Working Group (https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Base) is looking for new members, as Phil Knirsch left Red Hat and Jaroslav Reznik is tentative to leave the group. So, if you want to influence the base of Fedora and have a profound knowledge about the inner

[Base] Base Design WG agenda meeting 20 February 2015 15:00 UTC on #fedora-meeting

Agenda: - Vote for new chairman of the Base Design WG to replace Phil Knirsch - Open Floor -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct

Re: [Base] Base Design WG agenda meeting 20 February 2015 15:00 UTC on #fedora-meeting

On 20.02.2015 14:35, Harald Hoyer wrote: Agenda: - Vote for new chairman of the Base Design WG to replace Phil Knirsch - Open Floor Minutes: http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2015-02-20/fedora_base_design_working_group.2015-02-20-15.01.html Minutes (text): http

systemd-219 issues with 22 and Rawhide composes

To prevent surprises on the next systemd updates like in https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1116651, we will not apply workarounds anymore in rawhide and track the issues on https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=systemd-other-tracker so, that they are not forgotten. We removed the

Re: Migration to Zanata

On 10.02.2015 04:44, Noriko Mizumoto wrote: Hi Fedora developers I have not heard yet from the maintainers of the following packages. Fedora Localization Project would like to have them migrated in Zanata asap for good kickstart of F22. We all are much appreciated your immediate attention.

[Base] Base Design WG agenda meeting 21 November 2014 15:00 UTC on #fedora-meeting

Agenda: - Status buildrequires cleanup work (davids nils!) - Docker update - Status rpm mechanisms for multiple config subpackages - Status rpm mechanisms for factory reset files - Base WG ownership of generic network install images (keep it on the agenda, until all WG members are back

[Base] Base Design WG agenda meeting 14 November 2014 15:00 UTC on #fedora-meeting

Agenda: - Status buildrequires cleanup work (davids nils!) - Update on factory-reset work - Docker update - Open Floor Last meeting logs: http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2014-10-31/fedora_base_design_working_group.2014-10-31-15.02.log.html -- devel mailing list

Re: NetworkManager Bridges in Fedora

On 01/16/2014 08:09 PM, Dan Williams wrote: On Thu, 2014-01-16 at 13:53 -0500, Steve Dickson wrote: Hello, Has anybody had any luck with getting bridges consistently up in running in either F19 or F20? I know I have not... I go into setup/networks. Add a bridge which creates two file in

Re: [Base] Proposal for buildrequires cleanup janitorial initiative

Analyzed the BRs more closely and produced some graphs for your viewing pleasure: http://www.harald-hoyer.de/2014/01/14/self-hosting-fedora-base/ -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct:

Re: Grub installation. First potential Fedora killer

On 01/10/2014 11:57 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: On Thu, 2014-01-09 at 14:30 +0100, Harald Hoyer wrote: On 01/02/2014 11:32 PM, Jean François Martinez wrote: I have a nice booter setup and a nice _main_ Linux installation. Last thing I would want is a distribution I am _testing_

Re: Grub installation. First potential Fedora killer

On 01/02/2014 11:32 PM, Jean François Martinez wrote: I have a nice booter setup and a nice _main_ Linux installation. Last thing I would want is a distribution I am _testing_, that is Fedora 20 forces on me it will be my main installation and forces me to choose between installing Grub on

Re: [Base] Summary/Minutes from today's Base WG meeting (2013-11-08)

On 11/10/2013 01:39 PM, Daniel J Walsh wrote: A few other things, I would like to see broken out would be sort of a lower level definition for containers, based on the docker model. IE Can we remove the need for systemd/kernel from the new container group? Base Minimal Install Container

Re: dracut: how do I...

On 10/22/2013 12:59 PM, Felix Miata wrote: Difference in size between initramfs generated with and without nohostonly is huge. I don't want to routinely use nohostonly, but neither do I want a specific root filesystem specified with root=UUID in the image. I want root= on cmdline to be

Re: Automounting of the root partition in the initramfs

On 10/15/2013 02:47 PM, Juerg Haefliger wrote: All, The (admittedly hacky) dracut-modules-growroot package installs a dracut script that runs in the pre-pivot stage. It unmounts the root partition, extends it to the maximum possible size and then tries to remount it. What I noticed in F20

Re: Automounting of the root partition in the initramfs

On 10/15/2013 04:23 PM, Juerg Haefliger wrote: On 10/15/2013 02:47 PM, Juerg Haefliger wrote: All, The (admittedly hacky) dracut-modules-growroot package installs a dracut script that runs in the pre-pivot stage. It unmounts the root partition, extends it to the maximum possible size and

Re: Dracut HostOnly or ConfigurationOnly?

On 09/06/2013 11:31 AM, Roberto Ragusa wrote: On 09/06/2013 11:05 AM, poma wrote: On 05.09.2013 16:51, Harald Hoyer wrote: This Fedora release builds an initramfs tailored especially for your computer hardware. If you change your machine or partitions or significant hardware, you might

Re: Dracut HostOnly or ConfigurationOnly?

On 09/05/2013 04:25 PM, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote: On 09/05/2013 02:10 PM, Vratislav Podzimek wrote: 2) regenerate the initrd at the end of the installation This is what should be done both for live and regular installs. JBG I concur and say: 1) write out keyboard configuration before

Re: Dracut HostOnly or ConfigurationOnly?

On 09/05/2013 04:10 PM, Vratislav Podzimek wrote: Hello, everybody, I'd like to know your opinion on one issue we have hit on live installations due to the DracutHostOnly feature [1]. Long story short: 1) Anaconda installs the kernel package 2) installation of the kernel package triggers

Re: [RFC] Easiest making kernel rpms from upstream git

On 08/28/2013 08:31 PM, Kashyap Chamarthy wrote: On 08/28/2013 07:23 PM, Igor Gnatenko wrote: Today I've wrote article w/ many notes about bisecting kernel [0], but I've used make bzImage, make install and the same commands bypassing RPM and I have IMHO good idea to write utility, that will be

Re: Minimal install diff from F16 to F19 (TC6)

On 06/20/2013 09:21 AM, Adam Williamson wrote: As it may be interesting and I have the data on hand, here's the package diff between a minimal install of F16 and a minimal install of F19. F16 has 203 packages (I think it's really 202 but I somehow got an extra one into my test), F19 TC6 has

Re: Minimal install diff from F16 to F19 (TC6)

On 06/20/2013 11:59 AM, Remi Collet wrote: Le 20/06/2013 11:52, Harald Hoyer a écrit : $ rpm -q --whatrequires json-c no package requires json-c Probably should try $ rpm -q --whatrequires \ libjson.so.0()(64bit) \ libjson-c.so.2()(64bit) = pulseaudio, abrt, libreport

Re: Minimal install diff from F16 to F19 (TC6)

On 06/20/2013 11:59 AM, Remi Collet wrote: Le 20/06/2013 11:52, Harald Hoyer a écrit : $ rpm -q --whatrequires json-c no package requires json-c Probably should try $ rpm -q --whatrequires \ libjson.so.0()(64bit) \ libjson-c.so.2()(64bit) = pulseaudio, abrt, libreport

Please test dracut-029-1.fc19!!

https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-10871/dracut-029-1.fc19 Thank you! -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: Koji - Errno::ECONNREFUSED: Connection refused - getaddrinfo

On 04/24/2013 10:27 AM, Vít Ondruch wrote: Dne 23.4.2013 14:33, Vít Ondruch napsal(a): Hi, Since not a long ago, I cannot build Ruby for Rawhide, while it works just fine for F19. I observe following 4 errors in its test suite: 7) Error: test_proxy_eh_ENV_no_proxy(TestNetHTTP):

Re: what is initramfs-0-rescue in F19?

Am 09.04.2013 00:00, schrieb Jeffrey Bastian: On Mon, Apr 08, 2013 at 04:03:47PM -0500, Jeffrey Bastian wrote: I removed my initramfs-0-rescue-* file because I didn't know what it was and no rpm claimed to own it. How do I get it back? I've tried running dracut with various options and it

Re: what is initramfs-0-rescue in F19?

to install dracut-norescue... My fault. Am 07.04.2013 15:06, schrieb Harald Hoyer: install dracut-nohostonly if you don't want that... see the Release Notes of http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/DracutHostOnly On Sun, Apr 7, 2013 at 12:37 AM, Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net

Re: dracut hostonly and cloud images

Am 08.04.2013 15:05, schrieb Matthew Miller: We're going to produce official Fedora Cloud images which should run on Amazon EC2, and various open source cloud infrastructure -- OpenStack, Eucalyptus, CloudStack, OpenNebula; with both KVM and Xen -- and probably also under VMware and

Re: dracut hostonly and cloud images

Am 08.04.2013 17:59, schrieb Matthew Miller: On Mon, Apr 08, 2013 at 04:08:19PM +0200, Harald Hoyer wrote: Depends on what the dracut image should be able to boot. LVM, crypto, MD raids? I'm fine with none of those by default, assuming it's relatively easy to put it back if someone has

Re: dracut hostonly and cloud images

Am 08.04.2013 18:08, schrieb Matthew Miller: On Mon, Apr 08, 2013 at 06:04:52PM +0200, Harald Hoyer wrote: Cool, thanks. Is the best approach to generate a dracut.conf in the kickstart file? Or should it be packaged up in some way? Don't know and don't know how the images are generated

Re: what is initramfs-0-rescue in F19?

install dracut-nohostonly if you don't want that... see the Release Notes of http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/DracutHostOnly On Sun, Apr 7, 2013 at 12:37 AM, Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net wrote: -rw--- 1 root root 18M 22. Mär 17:06

Re: what is initramfs-0-rescue in F19?

Oops.. I meant dracut-norescue of course Am 07.04.2013 15:06 schrieb Harald Hoyer harald.ho...@gmail.com: install dracut-nohostonly if you don't want that... see the Release Notes of http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/DracutHostOnly On Sun, Apr 7, 2013 at 12:37 AM, Reindl Harald h.rei

Re: using fedup to upgrade to f19

Am 16.03.2013 01:09 schrieb Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com: On 15/03/13 04:56 PM, Sérgio Basto wrote: When I can expect have an updates.img ? composing is failing to generate images ? Possibly tomorrow, but it depends on the state of dracut and lorax. New dracut built with workaround

[HEADS UP] initramfs - dracut - systemd

In case you were not bitten by Schrödinger's Cat in Grub or got around her, you might run in dracut/systemd problems in the initramfs. You will have to update to at least systemd-198-6.fc19 and dracut-026-48.git20130315.fc19 for a working initramfs. # koji download-build --arch=$(arch)

Re: Proposed F19 Feature: Dracut HostOnly

Am 29.01.2013 17:20, schrieb John Reiser: A generic fallback image should be installed by anaconda on installation/update and never ever be removed. Also, fallback has interesting security properties… Rescue mode forces a SELinux relabel at the next boot, and relabel can take a very

Re: Proposed F19 Feature: Dracut HostOnly

Am 29.01.2013 19:28, schrieb Daniel J Walsh: On 01/29/2013 11:20 AM, John Reiser wrote: A generic fallback image should be installed by anaconda on installation/update and never ever be removed. Also, fallback has interesting security properties… Rescue mode forces a SELinux relabel at

Re: Proposed F19 Feature: Dracut HostOnly

Am 29.01.2013 16:53, schrieb Dennis Gilmore: El Tue, 29 Jan 2013 14:45:34 + Jaroslav Reznik jrez...@redhat.com escribió: = Features/DracutHostOnly = https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/DracutHostOnly Feature owner(s): Harald Hoyer har...@redhat.com Only create host-only initramfs

Re: Proposed F19 Feature: Dracut HostOnly

Am 30.01.2013 00:22, schrieb Dennis Gilmore: On Tue, 29 Jan 2013 16:32:12 + Matthew Garrett mj...@srcf.ucam.org wrote: On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 09:53:32AM -0600, Dennis Gilmore wrote: as legal has said we cannot pregenerate initramfses i think this should be a non-starter. We already

Re: Rawhide boot problems

Am 29.08.2012 00:43, schrieb Jerry James: First, systemd complained about being unable to find systemd-journal-flush.service. Sure enough, it wasn't in the initramfs. So I added $systemdsystemunitdir/systemd-journal-flush.service to /usr/lib/dracut/modules.d/98systemd/module-setup.sh, and

Re: Rawhide boot problems

Am 12.09.2012 13:25, schrieb Michael Schwendt: On Tue, 11 Sep 2012 23:50:15 +0200, Kay Sievers wrote: Wouldn't it already help if the build system would just refuse to build newer versions in branches than which are in rawhide at that moment? That would be dangerous with regard to

Re: dracut 009-12 never made it to f15-stable

Am 27.07.2012 06:46, schrieb Bill McGonigle: On 07/26/2012 04:40 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: You can build them from git I suppose. Wow, I took a few minutes to learn how to use fedpkg and I have to say it makes this embarrassingly easy! Kudos to the team. dracut-009-15.fc15 worked just as

Re: [HEADS-UP] Rawhide: /tmp is now on tmpfs

On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 6:43 PM, David Sommerseth dav...@redhat.com wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 01/06/12 19:42, Brian Wheeler wrote: On 06/01/2012 12:21 PM, Lennart Poettering wrote: I think most of the noise in this flame thread is due to a misunderstanding

Re: [HEADS-UP] Rawhide: /tmp is now on tmpfs

On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 8:57 PM, Chris Adams cmad...@hiwaay.net wrote: Once upon a time, Bruno Wolff III br...@wolff.to said: I had been testing /tmp on tmpfs, but turned it off because it was hiding /tmp where httpd had dumped a lot of core files which I was having trouble removing. There is

Re: UsrMove, /etc/shells, and rpm interpreter requires

Am 10.07.2012 17:18, schrieb Orion Poplawski: I just got the following: grib_api has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree: On x86_64: grib_api-1.9.16-3.fc18.x86_64 requires /usr/bin/ksh On i386: grib_api-1.9.16-3.fc18.i686 requires /usr/bin/ksh Please resolve this as soon as

dracut-20-51 - Heads up

Do not install dracut-020-51! Sorry for those, who have been bitten by dracut-020-51. Instead of installing to the /var/tmp/initramfs.* directory, it installed in your real root. To remove most (if not all) of the files, it has installed, do the following: # rm /.bash_history # rm

Re: dracut-20-51 - Heads up

Am 09.07.2012 10:43, schrieb Richard W.M. Jones: On Mon, Jul 09, 2012 at 09:44:16AM +0200, Harald Hoyer wrote: Do not install dracut-020-51! Sorry for those, who have been bitten by dracut-020-51. Instead of installing to the /var/tmp/initramfs.* directory, it installed in your real root

Re: dracut-20-51 - Heads up

Am 09.07.2012 09:44, schrieb Harald Hoyer: Do not install dracut-020-51! Sorry for those, who have been bitten by dracut-020-51. Instead of installing to the /var/tmp/initramfs.* directory, it installed in your real root. To remove most (if not all) of the files, it has installed, do

Re: dracut-20-51 - Heads up

Added an automatic test in the dracut testsuite, so that this never happens again.. Sorry for the inconvenience. Yes, rawhide sometimes eats babies. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: systemd system unit files and UsrMove

Am 20.02.2012 21:19, schrieb Miloslav Trmač: On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 9:07 PM, Kay Sievers kay.siev...@vrfy.org wrote: /usr/share in our general understanding not to be used for package-private things. Who is we? This is in direct conflict with the FHS: Any program or package which contains

Re: systemd system unit files and UsrMove

Am 21.02.12 14:37, schrieb Miloslav Trmač: On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 11:06 AM, Harald Hoyer harald.ho...@gmail.com wrote: Am 20.02.2012 21:19, schrieb Miloslav Trmač: On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 9:07 PM, Kay Sievers kay.siev...@vrfy.org wrote: There is no reason to have /usr/share/pkgdir/ and /usr

Re: /usrmove and path ordering

Am 15.02.2012 11:20 schrieb Ralf Corsepius rc040...@freenet.de: Yes. We've forked f17 and you guys are still chasing elementary bugs. What do you expect Fedora users to think of this? It communicates a nice impression of the quality of your works. Better stop this non-sense now rofl...

Re: /usrmove?

Am 11.02.2012 00:12 schrieb Chuck Anderson c...@wpi.edu: On Fri, Feb 10, 2012 at 08:39:47AM -0800, Toshio Kuratomi wrote: nod So one idea would be that a specific FESCo member needs to step up to be the collaboration guide (Must think of a better name for that :-) for a feature. They

Re: /usrmove?

Am 10.02.2012 08:36, schrieb Ondrej Vasik: On Fri, 2012-02-10 at 05:45 +0100, Ralf Corsepius wrote: On 02/09/2012 11:06 PM, Jared K. Smith wrote: - management, whom seems to be driven by a must have at any price, no point of return ever policy. I'm not sure who you're referring to as

Re: /usrmove?

Am 10.02.2012 12:36, schrieb Ondrej Vasik: Anyway, that's more for beer-meeting discussion next week ;). A very good proposal :-) -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

  1   2   >