Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F35 to F36
| # Run this only if you use default Fedora modules | # next time you run any DNF command default modules will be enabled again | sudo dnf module reset '*' | | dnf --releasever=36 --setopt=module_platform_id=platform:f36 \ | --enablerepo=updates-testing \ | $(rpm -q fedora-repos-modular >/dev/null && echo --enablerepo=updates-testing-modular) \ | --assumeno distro-sync I ran it on mine and had no issues. Transaction Summary == Install 47 Packages Upgrade2806 Packages Remove7 Packages Downgrade 6 Packages Total download size: 2.9 G Operation aborted. Excellent work! Harish -- Harish Pillay 9v1hp hpil...@redhat.com +65.9636.9253 gpg id: 0x746809E3 signature.asc Description: PGP signature ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: Thunderbird with mail.corp.redhat.com does not work on Fedora 33
| I've upgraded to Fedora 33 beta and I've discovered a problem with | Thunderbird. All email accounts work well except the Red Hat one with | mail.corp.redhat.com as an IMAP server (I use Zimbra servers not Gmail). | | The problem is that Thunderbird does not show any error message but it's not | able to communicate with the IMAP server. I'm not able to receive any | message from the server. I'm able to send a message but a copy is then not | saved to sent folder for the same reason. My first thought was that the | problem is caused by a downgrade from 68.11 to 68.10 because Thunderbird | currently FTBFS in Fedora 33 but it does not seem to be so. I've also tried | to remove the account and add it back but it did not help because I was no | longer able to log in to my account without any particular error message. | I've also tried to delete the server's certificates. | | The problem seems to be caused by strict crypto policies in Fedora 33 and | too small DH key provided by the server. | | $ update-crypto-policies --show | DEFAULT | | $ openssl s_client -showcerts -connect mail.corp.redhat.com:993 -servername | mail.corp.redhat.com | CONNECTED(0003) | depth=3 C = US, ST = North Carolina, L = Raleigh, O = "Red Hat, Inc.", OU = | Red Hat IT, CN = Red Hat IT Root CA, emailAddress = info...@redhat.com | verify return:1 | depth=2 O = Red Hat, OU = prod, CN = Intermediate Certificate Authority | verify return:1 | depth=1 O = Red Hat, OU = prod, CN = Certificate Authority | verify return:1 | depth=0 C = US, ST = North Carolina, L = Raleigh, O = Red Hat, OU = | Information Technology, emailAddress = serviced...@redhat.com, CN = | mail.corp.redhat.com | verify return:1 | 139893557032768:error:141A318A:SSL routines:tls_process_ske_dhe:dh key too | small:ssl/statem/statem_clnt.c:2149: | --- | | $ sudo update-crypto-policies --set LEGACY | Setting system policy to LEGACY | Note: System-wide crypto policies are applied on application start-up. | It is recommended to restart the system for the change of policies | to fully take place. | | openssl s_client -showcerts -connect mail.corp.redhat.com:993 -servername | mail.corp.redhat.com | CONNECTED(0003) | depth=3 C = US, ST = North Carolina, L = Raleigh, O = "Red Hat, Inc.", OU = | Red Hat IT, CN = Red Hat IT Root CA, emailAddress = info...@redhat.com | verify return:1 | depth=2 O = Red Hat, OU = prod, CN = Intermediate Certificate Authority | verify return:1 | depth=1 O = Red Hat, OU = prod, CN = Certificate Authority | verify return:1 | depth=0 C = US, ST = North Carolina, L = Raleigh, O = Red Hat, OU = | Information Technology, emailAddress = serviced...@redhat.com, CN = | mail.corp.redhat.com | verify return:1 | --- | ... ... | --- | * OK IMAP4 ready | | As you can see above, the DH key provided by the server is too small so the | SSL verification fails. Setting the crypto policies to LEGACY solves the | issue for me and I am again able to recreate my Red Hat account in | Thunderbird. | | Hope this helps. I'm going to report this problem to service desk. Same thing applies to mutt. I've filed this bz: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1883976 Harish signature.asc Description: PGP signature ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F30 to F31
* on the Wed, Sep 11, 2019 at 02:54:45PM +0200, Miroslav Such? was commenting: | Do you want to make Fedora 31 better? Please spend 1 minute of your time and try to run [*]: | | sudo dnf --releasever=31 --setopt=module_platform_id=platform:f31 --enablerepo=updates-testing distro-sync | | If you get this prompt: | | ... | Total download size: XXX M | Is this ok [y/N]: Transaction Summary Install 38 Packages Upgrade2378 Packages Remove8 Packages Downgrade 1 Package Total download size: 2.7 G Is this ok [y/N]: after adding --allowerasing to the commandline. Harish signature.asc Description: PGP signature ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Mozilla enabled ads in Firefox and they're active in Fedora
| Am 15.11.2014 um 15:06 schrieb Kevin Kofler: | Lars Seipel wrote: | What does the community think of it? Is it okay for our flagship | applications to carry ads and report tracking data? | | No! | | IMHO, we should consider dropping Firefox from Fedora entirely, in | favor of | Epiphany for Workstation and Midori for the Spins (except the KDE Spin | which | already ships Konqueror as the browser) | | NO! | | * i don't see that crap at all | * even if i could disable it (or maybe have it in about:config) | * i want to use Firefox for thousand reasons | | it's *not* freedom to remove Firefox | freedom would be make it not default but still offer it | | +1 | | Disabling the ADs feature from firefox, if that is possible, would be | the right move for Fedora. | | We also could lobby mozilla to re-consider this decision. Given the ability to have different search engines within Firefox (and I default to duckduckgo.com), if we can have Firefox have a off-by-default option for advertisements, then we all win. Harish pgput95lkYPdp.pgp Description: PGP signature -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Re: F16-F17 preupgrade (Re: F17 Beta to slip by an additional week.)
| On Thu, 2012-04-26 at 19:50 +0200, Micha?? Piotrowski wrote: | | Has anyone tried to preupgrade from F16 to F17? Are there any problems | related to UsrMove (or anything else)? | | I made the jump via preupgrade and had quite a bit of trouble. A number | of packages didn't get upgraded while some of their dependencies did, | including several that had strict version deps which should have | prevented this. | | The problem with this kind of report is that preupgrade uses the live | repositories, so any kind of package dependency-type issue you hit is | more to do with good old packaging human error than it is with | preupgrade, and is not necessarily likely to be encountered by anyone | else, at least in precisely the same way, because the repos change all | the time. You'd be about as likely to hit trouble with any 'live repo' | upgrade in this case (yum or DVD/netinst with remote repos enabled). I did a preupgrade from F16-F17 on Apr 27 and thankfully, all worked out - I am posting from that laptop. I am sure I took a big risk but so far, so good. -- Harish Pillay 9v1hp hpil...@redhat.com +65.9636.9253 gpg id: 746809E3 pgpMQBY0JHTiQ.pgp Description: PGP signature -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Install Fedora Button for LiveCD
* on the Tue, Apr 03, 2012 at 12:54:46PM -0500, Chris Adams was commenting: | Once upon a time, Matthias Clasen mcla...@redhat.com said: | That really depends on what use cases we see for our live cds. In my | view, there's really only two: | | The primary use for a live cd is to install. | | That's the primary use of the install media. The primary use of the | live media is to boot a live system. There are significant regions where people only get LiveCDs and not Install CDs - bandwidth, swag handouts at events etc. So, I think placing the icon/text on the top bar (as proposed by the OP), makes things much clearer and obvious. I've gotten so many questions about how to install from the liveCD, that it clearly is something that we should fix and make obvious. Regards. -- Harish Pillay 9v1hp hpil...@redhat.com +65.9636.9253 gpg id: 746809E3 pgpJL8ENLLFkE.pgp Description: PGP signature -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Fedora is featuring on GSoC 2012
Buddhike - | I am delighted to announce that the Fedora Project has been accepted | for the GSoC 2012 program[0]. | This would be the 7th time where the Fedora project represents the | program since 2005. | | The students' application procedure and other relevant information | will be published soon. If you are interested in | joining with the Fedora project as a student or a mentor please | explore following URLs. | | First of all subscribe for the summer-coding mailing list [1] and | explore the Idea list [2], feel free to contact us for more | information. | | [0] http://www.google-melange.com/gsoc/accepted_orgs/google/gsoc2012 | | [1] https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/summer-coding | | [2] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Summer_coding_ideas_for_2012 This is really wonderful. Thanks for stepping up to the task. The hard work starts now. Harish | -- | Regards, | Buddhike Chandradeepa Kurera(bckurera) | Fedora Ambassador Sri Lanka | Event Liaison - Design Team | | Email: bckur...@fedoraproject.org | IRC: bckurera | -- | devel mailing list | devel@lists.fedoraproject.org | https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel -- Harish Pillay 9v1hp hpil...@redhat.com +65.9636.9253 gpg id: 746809E3 pgpFpELBs9EtF.pgp Description: PGP signature -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
