Re: Coin4 build failure

[J. Scheurich]

About a question related to #error...

On 8/7/20 2:12 PM, Richard Shaw wrote:

So I was curious what the error was, but my bigger question is, what
changed?

This was just a rebuild for the CMake change FTBFS. I have not changed
anything other than what was necessary to fix the CMake commands.


Maybe the source maintainers improooved securitiy related things ?

so long
MUFTI
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Coin4 build failure

[J. Scheurich]

You can bypass this by using

CXXFLGS="-DXML_POOR_ENTROPY=1"


export CXXFLAGS="-DXML_POOR_ENTROPY=1"

in bash before compiling

sorry...

so long
MUFTO

___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Coin4 build failure

[J. Scheurich]

On 07.08.20 02:58, Richard Shaw wrote:
> While trying to update the spec for the CMake change I ran into this
> for the first time:
>
> cd /builddir/build/BUILD/coin-6enkw/x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu/src/base
> && /usr/bin/g++
>  -I/builddir/build/BUILD/coin-6enkw/x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu/data
> -I/builddir/build/BUILD/coin-6enkw/include/Inventor/annex
> -I/builddir/build/BUILD/coin-6enkw/src
> -I/builddir/build/BUILD/coin-6enkw/x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu/src
> -I/builddir/build/BUILD/coin-6enkw/include
> -I/builddir/build/BUILD/coin-6enkw/x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu/include -O2
> -flto=auto -ffat-lto-objects -fexceptions -g -grecord-gcc-switches
> -pipe -Wall -Werror=format-security -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2
> -Wp,-D_GLIBCXX_ASSERTIONS
> -specs=/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/redhat-hardened-cc1
> -fstack-protector-strong -specs=/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/redhat-annobin-cc1
>  -m64 -mtune=generic -fasynchronous-unwind-tables
> -fstack-clash-protection -fcf-protection -DNDEBUG -fPIC
> -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -DCOIN_INTERNAL -DCOIN_DEBUG=0 -o
> CMakeFiles/base.dir/dict.cpp.o -c
> /builddir/build/BUILD/coin-6enkw/src/base/dict.cpp
> /builddir/build/BUILD/coin-6enkw/src/xml/expat/xmlparse.c:94:3: error:
> #error You do not have support for any sources of high quality entropy
> enabled. For end user security, that is probably not what you want.
> Your options include: * Linux + glibc >=2.25 (getrandom):
> HAVE_GETRANDOM, * Linux + glibc <2.25 (syscall SYS_getrandom):
> HAVE_SYSCALL_GETRANDOM, * BSD / macOS >=10.7 (arc4random_buf):
> HAVE_ARC4RANDOM_BUF, * BSD / macOS <10.7 (arc4random):
> HAVE_ARC4RANDOM, * libbsd (arc4random_buf): HAVE_ARC4RANDOM_BUF +
> HAVE_LIBBSD, * libbsd (arc4random): HAVE_ARC4RANDOM + HAVE_LIBBSD, *
> Linux / BSD / macOS (/dev/urandom): XML_DEV_URANDOM * Windows
> (RtlGenRandom): _WIN32. If insist on not using any of these, bypass
> this error by defining XML_POOR_ENTROPY; you have been warned. If you
> have reasons to patch this detection code away or need changes to the
> build system, please open a bug. Thank you!
>    94 | # error  \
>       |   ^
>
> Thoughts?
>
A longer pat of the source would be help, cause #error is commonly used
to describe a problem
detected by the compiler during complie time like here:


https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/cpp/preprocessor/hash-error-directive-c-cpp?view=vs-2019

|#if !defined(__cplusplus) #error C++ compiler required. #endif |

Not  recommended, but often seen

The error text in this case is

You do not have support for any sources of high quality entropy enabled.
For end user security, that is probably not what you want. Your options
include: * Linux + glibc >=2.25 (getrandom): HAVE_GETRANDOM, * Linux +
glibc <2.25 (syscall SYS_getrandom): HAVE_SYSCALL_GETRANDOM, * BSD /
macOS >=10.7 (arc4random_buf): HAVE_ARC4RANDOM_BUF, * BSD / macOS <10.7
(arc4random): HAVE_ARC4RANDOM, * libbsd (arc4random_buf):

If insist on not using any of these, bypass this error by defining
XML_POOR_ENTROPY; you have been warned. If you have reasons to patch
this detection code away or need changes to the build system, please
open a bug. Thank you!

You can bypass this by using

CXXFLGS="-DXML_POOR_ENTROPY=1"


but you should reinspect the osusres to use a better random seed.

so long
MUFTI
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Reminder: upcoming Fedora 33 deadlines & milestones

[J. Scheurich]

Am 05.08.20 um 01:52 schrieb Ben Cotton:

Here are some upcoming deadlines and milestones for the Fedora 33
development cycle:

Are you sure, that boost1.73 should be part of fedora 33 ?
It lloks like boost.173 would require a future verson of gcc/g++

ao long
MUFTI
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: gdb says "Unexpected size of section `.reg-xstate/...` in core file

[J. Scheurich]

I'm not sure if this is a bug and if it is, where it is...

$ coredumpctl gdb
...
Using host libthread_db library "/lib64/libthread_db.so.1".
Core was generated by `/usr/lib/systemd/systemd-oomd'.
Program terminated with signal SIGABRT, Aborted.

warning: Unexpected size of section `.reg-xstate/59286' in core file.
#0  0x7f552f8b3b95 in raise () from /lib64/libc.so.6
(gdb)


coredumpctl gdb is a command for systemd to unhide and debug
the last core file.
Do you have a crash/core file ?
Otherwise this output may mean "no core file found" ?

so long
MUFTI
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

yuv2png and vpxenc (webm) in fedora ?

[J. Scheurich]

Hi,

Would it be ok, to create a png2vuy and vpxenc package in fedora ?
With png2vuy and vpxenc it would be possible to create a webm-movie from
a sequence of image files.
Can the fedora firefox show a .webm file (youtube use the .webm format) ?
A program, that could use png2yuv and vpxenc for movie creation would be
white_dune

so long
MUFTI
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Why fedpkg build failed ?

[J. Scheurich]

Hi,

I updated white_dune with creating a source.rpm,

$ fedpkg clone wdune
$ fedpkg import source.rpm
$ fedpkg commit
$ fedpkg push
$ fedpkg build

but i get the following problem

https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=45824536 ->
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=45824645 ->
https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//work/tasks/4645/45824645/root.log

INFO buildroot.py:440:  Mock Version: 2.3
DEBUG util.py:215:  ensuring that dir exists: 
/var/lib/mock/f33-build-21066053-1630063/root/dev/pts
DEBUG util.py:218:  creating dir: 
/var/lib/mock/f33-build-21066053-1630063/root/dev/pts
DEBUG util.py:215:  ensuring that dir exists: 
/var/lib/mock/f33-build-21066053-1630063/root/dev/shm
DEBUG util.py:218:  creating dir: 
/var/lib/mock/f33-build-21066053-1630063/root/dev/shm
DEBUG buildroot.py:598:  kernel version == 5.6.15-300.fc32.armv7hl+lpae
DEBUG util.py:228:  touching file: 
/var/lib/mock/f33-build-21066053-1630063/root/etc/fstab
DEBUG util.py:228:  touching file: 
/var/lib/mock/f33-build-21066053-1630063/root/etc/yum/yum.conf
DEBUG util.py:228:  touching file: 
/var/lib/mock/f33-build-21066053-1630063/root/etc/dnf/dnf.conf
DEBUG util.py:228:  touching file: 
/var/lib/mock/f33-build-21066053-1630063/root/var/log/yum.log
DEBUG util.py:215:  ensuring that dir exists: 
/var/lib/mock/f33-build-21066053-1630063/root/proc
DEBUG util.py:793:  child environment: None
DEBUG util.py:719:  Executing command: ['/bin/mount', '-n', '-t', 'tmpfs', 
'-o', 'rprivate', 'tmpfs', 
'/var/lib/mock/f33-build-21066053-1630063/root/proc'] with env {'TERM': 
'vt100', 'SHELL': '/bin/sh', 'HOME': '/builddir', 'HOSTNAME': 'mock', 'PATH': 
'/usr/bin:/bin:/usr/sbin:/sbin', 'LANG': 'C.UTF-8'} and shell False
DEBUG util.py:774:  Child return code was: 0
DEBUG util.py:215:  ensuring that dir exists: 
/var/lib/mock/f33-build-21066053-1630063/root/proc
DEBUG util.py:793:  child environment: None
DEBUG util.py:719:  Executing command: ['/bin/mount', '-n', '--rbind', '-o', 
'nodev,noexec,nosuid,readonly,rprivate', '/proc', 
'/var/lib/mock/f33-build-21066053-1630063/root/proc'] with env {'TERM': 
'vt100', 'SHELL': '/bin/sh', 'HOME': '/builddir', 'HOSTNAME': 'mock', 'PATH': 
'/usr/bin:/bin:/usr/sbin:/sbin', 'LANG': 'C.UTF-8'} and shell False
DEBUG util.py:774:  Child return code was: 0
DEBUG util.py:215:  ensuring that dir exists: 
/var/lib/mock/f33-build-21066053-1630063/root/sys
DEBUG util.py:793:  child environment: None
DEBUG util.py:719:  Executing command: ['/bin/mount', '-n', '-t', 'tmpfs', 
'-o', 'rprivate', 'tmpfs', '/var/lib/mock/f33-build-21066053-1630063/root/sys'] 
with env {'TERM': 'vt100', 'SHELL': '/bin/sh', 'HOME': '/builddir', 'HOSTNAME': 
'mock', 'PATH': '/usr/bin:/bin:/usr/sbin:/sbin', 'LANG': 'C.UTF-8'} and shell 
False
DEBUG util.py:774:  Child return code was: 0
DEBUG util.py:215:  ensuring that dir exists: 
/var/lib/mock/f33-build-21066053-1630063/root/sys
DEBUG util.py:793:  child environment: None
DEBUG util.py:719:  Executing command: ['/bin/mount', '-n', '--rbind', '-o', 
'nodev,noexec,nosuid,readonly,rprivate', '/sys', 
'/var/lib/mock/f33-build-21066053-1630063/root/sys'] with env {'TERM': 'vt100', 
'SHELL': '/bin/sh', 'HOME': '/builddir', 'HOSTNAME': 'mock', 'PATH': 
'/usr/bin:/bin:/usr/sbin:/sbin', 'LANG': 'C.UTF-8'} and shell False
DEBUG util.py:774:  Child return code was: 0
...


What do this messages mean ?

so long
MUFTI
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Fwd: How to update ? Was:[Red Hat Bugzilla] Your Outstanding Requests

[J. Scheurich]

Hi,
>> What is wrong ?
> Bugzilla + the build system are not magically linked. You need to close the
> bug manually after building the package in rawhide and F32.
>
> Just from a quick glance I think your rebuilds were successful so you can
> close the bug report. :-)
Thanks. But how do i close the bugreport ?

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1800246

do not offer a "close bug"

so long
MUFTI
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Fwd: How to update ? Was:[Red Hat Bugzilla] Your Outstanding Requests

[J. Scheurich]

Hi,

I got the following mail:

 Forwarded Message 
Subject:[Red Hat Bugzilla] Your Outstanding Requests
Date:   Mon, 2 Mar 2020 02:11:13 GMT
From:   bugzi...@redhat.com
To: muft...@web.de



The following is a list of bugs or attachments to bugs in which a user
has been
waiting more than 3 days for a response from you. Please take
action on these requests as quickly as possible. (Note that some of
these bugs
might already be closed, but a user is still waiting for your response.)

We'll remind you again tomorrow if these requests are still outstanding,
or if
there are any new requests where users have been waiting more than 3
days for your response.

needinfo


Bug 1800246: wdune: FTBFS in Fedora rawhide/f32 (15 days old)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1800246
To see all your outstanding requests, visit:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/request.cgi?action=queue=mufti11%40web.de=type
 End Forwarded Message 

According to

https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=41322749

this is version 1.654

buildArch (wdune-1.654-4.fc32.src.rpm, armv7hl)


but i updated to version 1.789

with something like

...
$ fedpkg import wdune-1.789-sourcrerpm
...
$ fedpkg ---release f32
$ fedpkg build

This showed no error.

What is wrong ?

so long
MUFTI




___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Why does "fedpkg build" failed for wdune ?

[J. Scheurich]

https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=41519708

| Result

| GenericError: Build already in progress (task 41519706)

I already started "fedpkg build", but it said

...
Watching tasks (this may be safely interrupted)...

so i interrupted it and restarted "fedpkg build"

What to do ?

so long
MUFTI
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

reiew request freewrl 4.0

[J. Scheurich]

Hi,

I want to offer a review swap for freewrl 4.0:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1789919

/I would prefer C/C++ project to review.

so long
MUFTI
/
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

wdune/white is available for fedora 32

[J. Scheurich]

Hi,

After 13 months, wdune/white_dune is avaliable for fedora 32 8-)

I want to say thanks for anyońe, who gave tips, especially Petr Menšík
(the reviewer) and
Robert-André Mauchin (the sponsor).


so long
MUFTI


___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Fedora Account Data Update mufti11

[J. Scheurich]

On 1/3/20 3:55 PM, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote:

What does
ssh -vvvmuft...@pkgs.fedoraproject.org
say?

$ ssh -vvv muft...@pkgs.fedoraproject.org
OpenSSH_8.1p1, OpenSSL 1.1.1d FIPS  10 Sep 2019
debug1: Reading configuration data /home/home/mufti/.ssh/config
debug1: Reading configuration data /etc/ssh/ssh_config
debug3: /etc/ssh/ssh_config line 51: Including file
/etc/ssh/ssh_config.d/05-redhat.conf depth 0
debug1: Reading configuration data /etc/ssh/ssh_config.d/05-redhat.conf
debug2: checking match for 'final all' host pkgs.fedoraproject.org
originally pkgs.fedoraproject.org
debug3: /etc/ssh/ssh_config.d/05-redhat.conf line 3: not matched 'final'
debug2: match not found
debug3: /etc/ssh/ssh_config.d/05-redhat.conf line 5: Including file
/etc/crypto-policies/back-ends/openssh.config depth 1 (parse only)
debug1: Reading configuration data
/etc/crypto-policies/back-ends/openssh.config
debug3: gss kex names ok: [gss-gex-sha1-,gss-group14-sha1-,gss-group1-sha1-]
debug3: kex names ok:
[curve25519-sha256,curve25519-sha...@libssh.org,ecdh-sha2-nistp256,ecdh-sha2-nistp384,ecdh-sha2-nistp521,diffie-hellman-group-exchange-sha256,diffie-hellman-group14-sha256,diffie-hellman-group16-sha512,diffie-hellman-group18-sha512,diffie-hellman-group-exchange-sha1,diffie-hellman-group14-sha1,diffie-hellman-group1-sha1]
debug1: configuration requests final Match pass
debug1: re-parsing configuration
debug1: Reading configuration data /home/home/mufti/.ssh/config
debug1: Reading configuration data /etc/ssh/ssh_config
debug3: /etc/ssh/ssh_config line 51: Including file
/etc/ssh/ssh_config.d/05-redhat.conf depth 0
debug1: Reading configuration data /etc/ssh/ssh_config.d/05-redhat.conf
debug2: checking match for 'final all' host pkgs.fedoraproject.org
originally pkgs.fedoraproject.org
debug3: /etc/ssh/ssh_config.d/05-redhat.conf line 3: matched 'final'
debug2: match found
debug3: /etc/ssh/ssh_config.d/05-redhat.conf line 5: Including file
/etc/crypto-policies/back-ends/openssh.config depth 1
debug1: Reading configuration data
/etc/crypto-policies/back-ends/openssh.config
debug3: gss kex names ok: [gss-gex-sha1-,gss-group14-sha1-,gss-group1-sha1-]
debug3: kex names ok:
[curve25519-sha256,curve25519-sha...@libssh.org,ecdh-sha2-nistp256,ecdh-sha2-nistp384,ecdh-sha2-nistp521,diffie-hellman-group-exchange-sha256,diffie-hellman-group14-sha256,diffie-hellman-group16-sha512,diffie-hellman-group18-sha512,diffie-hellman-group-exchange-sha1,diffie-hellman-group14-sha1,diffie-hellman-group1-sha1]
debug2: resolving "pkgs.fedoraproject.org" port 22
debug2: ssh_connect_direct
debug1: Connecting to pkgs.fedoraproject.org [209.132.181.4] port 22.
debug1: Connection established.
debug1: identity file /home/home/mufti/.ssh/id_rsa type 0
debug1: identity file /home/home/mufti/.ssh/id_rsa-cert type -1
debug1: identity file /home/home/mufti/.ssh/id_dsa type -1
debug1: identity file /home/home/mufti/.ssh/id_dsa-cert type -1
debug1: identity file /home/home/mufti/.ssh/id_ecdsa type -1
debug1: identity file /home/home/mufti/.ssh/id_ecdsa-cert type -1
debug1: identity file /home/home/mufti/.ssh/id_ed25519 type -1
debug1: identity file /home/home/mufti/.ssh/id_ed25519-cert type -1
debug1: identity file /home/home/mufti/.ssh/id_xmss type -1
debug1: identity file /home/home/mufti/.ssh/id_xmss-cert type -1
debug1: Local version string SSH-2.0-OpenSSH_8.1
debug1: Remote protocol version 2.0, remote software version OpenSSH_7.4
debug1: match: OpenSSH_7.4 pat
OpenSSH_7.0*,OpenSSH_7.1*,OpenSSH_7.2*,OpenSSH_7.3*,OpenSSH_7.4*,OpenSSH_7.5*,OpenSSH_7.6*,OpenSSH_7.7*
compat 0x0402
debug2: fd 4 setting O_NONBLOCK
debug1: Authenticating to pkgs.fedoraproject.org:22 as 'mufti11'
debug3: hostkeys_foreach: reading file "/home/home/mufti/.ssh/known_hosts"
debug3: record_hostkey: found key type RSA in file
/home/home/mufti/.ssh/known_hosts:4
debug3: load_hostkeys: loaded 1 keys from pkgs.fedoraproject.org
debug3: order_hostkeyalgs: prefer hostkeyalgs:
rsa-sha2-512-cert-...@openssh.com,rsa-sha2-256-cert-...@openssh.com,ssh-rsa-cert-...@openssh.com,rsa-sha2-512,rsa-sha2-256,ssh-rsa
debug3: send packet: type 20
debug1: SSH2_MSG_KEXINIT sent
debug3: receive packet: type 20
debug1: SSH2_MSG_KEXINIT received
debug2: local client KEXINIT proposal
debug2: KEX algorithms:
curve25519-sha256,curve25519-sha...@libssh.org,ecdh-sha2-nistp256,ecdh-sha2-nistp384,ecdh-sha2-nistp521,diffie-hellman-group-exchange-sha256,diffie-hellman-group14-sha256,diffie-hellman-group16-sha512,diffie-hellman-group18-sha512,diffie-hellman-group-exchange-sha1,diffie-hellman-group14-sha1,diffie-hellman-group1-sha1,ext-info-c
debug2: host key algorithms:

Re: Fedora Account Data Update mufti11

[J. Scheurich]

You might have to wait a bit until the changes have propagated.
If it still doesn't work, make sure the .ssh/id_rsa file has mode 600,
otherwise OpenSSH will give you errors.

Thanks, but it still do not work:

$ ls -l .ssh/id_rsa.pub
-rw---. 1 mufti mufti 575 Jan  3 13:41 .ssh/id_rsa.pub
[mufti@linux ~]$ fedpkg clone wdune
Cloning into 'wdune'...
muft...@pkgs.fedoraproject.org: Permission denied (publickey).
fatal: Could not read from remote repository.

Please make sure you have the correct access rights
and the repository exists.
Could not execute clone: Failed to execute command.

so long
MUFTI
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Fwd: Fedora Account Data Update mufti11

[J. Scheurich]

Hi,

I tried:

$ fedpkg clone wdune
Cloning into 'wdune'...
muft...@pkgs.fedoraproject.org: Permission denied (publickey).
fatal: Could not read from remote repository.

Please make sure you have the correct access rights
and the repository exists.
Could not execute clone: Failed to execute command.


I logged into FAS and updated my ssh key and gpg.

I got a email with:

You have just updated information about your account. If you did not request
these changes please contactad...@fedoraproject.org and let them know. Your
updated information is:

username: mufti11
full name: J. "MUFTI" Scheurich
ircnick: None
telephone: 071150479845
locale: en
timezone: Europe/Berlin
country code: DE
latitude: None
longitude: None
privacy flag: False
ssh_key: ssh-rsa
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mu...@linux.fritz.box

gpg_keyid: 5269558ED797EDD374D1C844F8FBBEF0632A9918

If the above information is incorrect, please log in and fix it:

https://admin.fedoraproject.org/accounts/user/edit/mufti11



It looks lik the information is correct:

$ cat ~/.ssh/id_rsa.pub
ssh-rsa
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
mu...@linux.fritz.box
$ gpg -ka mufti11
pub   rsa4096 2019-06-11 [SCEA] [expires: 2020-06-10]
  7686907C86109D8A31A004AC3005F9A641282A81
uid   [ultimate] Jörg Scheurich (white_dune upstream)


pub   rsa2048 2019-12-23 [SC] [expires: 2021-12-22]
  5269558ED797EDD374D1C844F8FBBEF0632A9918
uid   [ultimate] J. Sheurih 
sub   rsa2048 2019-12-23 [E]

But i still get:

$ fedpkg clone wdune
Cloning into 'wdune'...
muft...@pkgs.fedoraproject.org: Permission denied (publickey).
fatal: Could not read from remote repository.

Please make sure you have the correct access rights
and the repository exists.
Could not execute clone: Failed to execute command.

Any idears ?

so long
MUFTI
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Final fedora distribution Was: How to reuild wdune ?

[J. Scheurich]

https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/packageinfo?tagOrder=extra_arches=30158=-completion_time=0#taglist
**
| Information for package wdune
| f32     releng     yes

Maybe this could be a problem ?

so long
MUFTI
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Final fedora distribution Was: How to reuild wdune ?

[J. Scheurich]

Hi,

$ fedpkg request-branch --repo wdune f31
Could not execute request_branch: Missing a Pagure token. Refer to
"fedpkg request-repo -h" to set atoken in your user configuration.
$ fedpkg request-repo wdune
Could not execute request_repo: A Bugzilla bug is required on new
repository requests
$

I adeded it a dummy bug

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1786307

but no effect 8-(

so long
MUFTI
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Final fedora distribution Was: How to reuild wdune ?

[J. Scheurich]

Hi,

| fedpkg request-branch --repo wdune f31
| fedpkg request-branch --repo wdune f30

$ fedpkg request-branch --repo wdune f31
Could not execute request_branch: Missing a Pagure token. Refer to
"fedpkg request-repo -h" to set atoken in your user configuration.

I created a new token at https://pagure.io/settings/token/new and
inserted it in ~/.config/rpkg/fedpkg.conf

???

so long

MUFTI
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Final fedora distribution Was: How to reuild wdune ?

[J. Scheurich]

Hi,

$ fedpkg build --target f32

was successfull.

# lsb_release -a | grep Release
Release:    32
# yum search wdune
Last metadata expiration check: 1:42:31 ago on Tue 24 Dec 2019 06:59:24
AM CET.
No matches found.

What is needed to add wdune to fedora 32 ?

so long
MUFTI
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: How to reuild wdune ?

[J. Scheurich]

$ fedpkg build --target f31

https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=39903543

Result

BuildError: package wdune not in list for tag f31-updates-candidate


What has to be done, to bring wdune to fedora 31 ?

so long
MUFTI
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: How to reuild wdune ?

[J. Scheurich]

Hi,

I got

$ fedpkg build

for wdune running, but what i need to publish it ?

So i can install it with

# yum install wdune

?

so long
MUFTI
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: How to reuild wdune ?

[J. Scheurich]

I tried the following:

$ kinit muft...@fedoraproject.org 
rm -rf wdune
fedpkg clone wdune
cd wdune
$ fedpkg import ~/rpmbuild/SRPMS/wdune-1.654-3.fc32.src.rpm >
/dev/null

$ git commit -sm "Initial import (#1658153)"


You do not need to sign your git commits.

error: gpg failed to sign the data
fatal: failed to write commit object


So the commit probably failed because git couldn't find a GPG
associated with your email address.




Why would you want to sign your commits with fedora GPG keys, and not
your own key? And those are the public keys, they wouldn't help you
either way ...


I think ,my gpg key are up to date.

How to proove it ?


Just skip the -s argument in "git commit".


$ git commit
error: gpg failed to sign the data
fatal: failed to write commit object

Same problem 8-(


so long

MUFTI

___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

How to reuild wdune ?

[J. Scheurich]

Hi,

I tried the following:

$ kinit muft...@fedoraproject.org
rm -rf wdune
fedpkg clone wdune
cd wdune
$ fedpkg import ~/rpmbuild/SRPMS/wdune-1.654-3.fc32.src.rpm > /dev/null

$ git commit -sm "Initial import (#1658153)"
error: gpg failed to sign the data
fatal: failed to write commit object
$ fedpkg push
Everything up-to-date
$ fedpkg build
Could not execute build: /home/home/mufti/wdune has uncommitted
changes.  Use git status to see details
Try option --srpm to make scratch build from local changes.
$

I updated the gpg keys with

curl https://getfedora.org/static/fedora.gpg | gpg --import
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Current status of wdune and vcglib ?

[J. Scheurich]

Hi,

I got 2 emails:

| Your Pagure API key wdune (white_dune) is a graphical VRML97/X3D
editor will expire in 1 day(s).
| Please get a new key for non-interrupted service.

| Your Pagure API key vcglib Visualization and Computer Graphics Library will 
expire in 1 day(s).
| Please get a new key for non-interrupted service.

How to set a Pagure API key ?

There are some problems relating to wdune and vcglib:

$ kinit muft...@fedoraproject.org
Password for muft...@fedoraproject.org:
 fedpkg clone wdune
Cloning into 'wdune'...
remote: Counting objects: 3, done.
remote: Total 3 (delta 0), reused 0 (delta 0)
Receiving objects: 100% (3/3), done.
$ fedpkg clone vcglib
Cloning into 'vcglib'...
No such repository
fatal: Could not read from remote repository.

Please make sure you have the correct access rights
and the repository exists.
Could not execute clone: Failed to execute command.
$

I was able to add source to wdune and git add/commit/push it, but the
git push do not come to a
end saying soemthing like "distributing information".

What is the current fedora status of wdune and vcglib ?

so long
MUFTI
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: which old version of fedora can read a old iRIX XFS filesystem ?

[J. Scheurich]

Hi,

| When trying to mount a old SGI IRIX64 XFS filesystem, current Linux
| versions complain with:

| function not implemented

| So you have to use a older Linux version (e.g. 2.68).

Just for the records: i was able to read a IRIX64 XFS MO-dsik with a USB
MO-drive using
a Ubuntu Linux 4.10 Live CD image in kvm/Virtual machine Manager.

Unfortunately the data  was uninteresting 8-(

so long
MUFTI

___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

which old version of fedora can read a old iRIX XFS filesystem ?

[J. Scheurich]

Hi,

When trying to mount a old SGI IRIX64 XFS filesystem, current Linux
versions complain with:

function not implemented

So you have to use a older Linux version (e.g. 2.68).

Which fedora version is old enough and are old fedora CD/DVD images
still available ?

so long
MUFTI
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: How to approve a review request ?

[J. Scheurich]

Hi

I want to approve the review request of vimvi-qt, but  this is my first
offical review 8-(

You need to set fedora-review+ flag. Click on "Show advanced fields" near
the top of the bug, and flags should be visible in a drop-down menu on
the right.



Mufti, it's weird that your screenshot shows that you can set the
fedora-review flag to ? but not to +. Maybe file a ticket with
infra---possibly Bugzilla didn't sync with FAS properly or something?



How do i file a ticket with infra ?

so long
MUFTI
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: How to approve a review request ?

[J. Scheurich]

Hi,

I want to approve the review request of vimvi-qt, but  this is my first
offical review 8-(

You need to set fedora-review+ flag. Click on "Show advanced fields" near
the top of the bug, and flags should be visible in a drop-down menu on
the right.


I still don't find it 8-(

http://wdune.ourproject.org/examples/vimvi.png

so long
MUFTI
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

How to approve a review request ?

[J. Scheurich]

Hi,

I want to approve the review request of vimvi-qt, but  this is my first
offical review 8-(

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1770278

I can't find the right page to do that.

Can someone help me ?

so long
MUFTI
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Problems using fedpkg

[J. Scheurich]

Hi,
>> When i try to use "fedpkg co vcglib", i get
>>
>> $ fedpkg co vcglib
>> Cloning into 'vcglib'...
>> muft...@pkgs.fedoraproject.org: Permission denied (publickey).
>> fatal: Could not read from remote repository.
>>
>>
>> How to set/reset the right account information ?
>>
>> so long
>> MUFTI
> I think you'll have to add your public key here:
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/accounts/user/view/mufti11
>
> After that, it might take a few hours for that to propagate to other systems.

I get:

The server encountered an unexpected condition which prevented it from
fulfilling the request.

The key file was exported with:

$ gpg --export  muft...@web.de > key

what is wrong ?

so long
MUFTI
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Problems using fedpkg

[J. Scheurich]

Hi,

When i try to use "fedpkg co vcglib", i get

$ fedpkg co vcglib
Cloning into 'vcglib'...
muft...@pkgs.fedoraproject.org: Permission denied (publickey).
fatal: Could not read from remote repository.

Please make sure you have the correct access rights
and the repository exists.
Could not execute clone: Failed to execute command.

How to set/reset the right account information ?

so long
MUFTI
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Simple review swap: vimiv-qt: image viewer with vim like key bindings

[J. Scheurich]

Would anyone like to swap reviews please? I'd like to vimiv-qt reviewed:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1770278

I could review it in exchange of a review of vcglib:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1677989

This has been already reviewed, but the review is too old to be usable.

so long
MUFTI
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: review swap for vcglib

[J. Scheurich]

Cause the last review is too old, i need a fresh review for vcglib:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1677989

I also cannot find the "muftii" FAS account you listed in this bug ...


Sorry, typo: it should be "mufti11" 8-(


I'm available for any review in exchange.

My initial target is wdune (white_dune), but it also requires OpenSubdiv.
There is a fedora 30 package for OpenSubdiv and a review request
for OpenSubdiv. Just wait for a fedora 31 Opensubdiv package ?

What do you mean, there's a fedora 30 package for OpenSubdiv?


Strange: there is a "BuildRequires: opensubdiv-devel" in the wdune spec
file, and  it looks like, it do not fail under fedora 30


And what do you mean by "just wait for a fedora 31 package"?


The review-request for OpenSubdiv is from 16.10.2019,  so i hope OpenSubdiv
there will be something i can use as

BuildRequires: opensubdiv-devel

in the wdune .spec file for fedora 31 in the near future

so long
MUFTI
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

review swap for vcglib

[J. Scheurich]

Hi,

Cause the last review is too old, i need a fresh review for vcglib:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1677989

I'm available for any review in exchange.

My initial target is wdune (white_dune), but it also requires OpenSubdiv.
There is a fedora 30 package for OpenSubdiv and a review request
for OpenSubdiv. Just wait for a fedora 31 Opensubdiv package ?

so long
MUFTI
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

review swap for wdune (white_dune)

[J. Scheurich]

Hi,

Cause the last review is too old, i need a fresh review for wdune
(white_dune):

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1658153

This package requires vcglib:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1677989

I'm available for any review in exchange.

so long
MUFTI
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: vcglib Review too old

[J. Scheurich]

$ fedpkg request-repo vcglib 1677989
Could not execute request_repo: The Bugzilla bug's review was approved
over 60 days ago

What to do ?


A need a "new" review. This can be pretty simple if the original
reviewer just resets the "fedora-review" flag and sets it again
(assuming there is no new policy which requires changes to the spec
file).


There are no changes in the spec file.

so long
MUFTI
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

vcglib Review too old

[J. Scheurich]

Hi,

When i try

$ fedpkg request-repo vcglib 1677989
Could not execute request_repo: The Bugzilla bug's review was approved
over 60 days ago

What to do ?

so long

MUFTI
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Low Memory Detection on Linux

[J. Scheurich]

gmemusage is a tool to show memory usage per userspace application.
top can show low memory state.


I remember gmemusage from the SGI days and remember using it on Linux
too, but currently

yum whatprovides */gmemusage

claims there are No Matches Found. Where did you get your gmemusage from?


https://packages.debian.org/sid/utils/gmemusage

Points as homepage

http://oss.sgi.com/projects/gmemusage/

which id not valid, but the sources

http://deb.debian.org/debian/pool/main/g/gmemusage/gmemusage_0.2.orig.tar.gz

are usable.

so long
MUFTI
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Low Memory Detection on Linux

[J. Scheurich]

do you know if there's any reliable and widely available way how to
measure memory usage on Linux by user space application (Firefox in
this case) and detect low-memory state?



gmemusage is a tool to show memory usage per userspace application.
top can show low memory state.

so long
MUFTI
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: fedora-review broken?

[J. Scheurich]

> On Wed, Aug 28, 2019, 15:12 Richard Shaw  > wrote:
>
> While I'm trying to use it for a review on RPM Fusion I don't
> think the error is related...
>
> Just running fedora-review without any arguments produces this in
> the log:
>
> Traceback (most recent call last):
>   File
> "/usr/lib/python3.7/site-packages/FedoraReview/review_helper.py",
> line 236, in run
>     self._do_run(outfile)
>   File
> "/usr/lib/python3.7/site-packages/FedoraReview/review_helper.py",
> line 197, in _do_run
>     Settings.init()
>

I get similar errors when i try to use fedora-review under fedora31.
Amazingly fedora-review under fedora30 works without this problem.
This is the same fedora-review version, but maybe the problem is in the
used python scripts ?

so long
MUFTI
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: fedora-review seam to not work 8-(

[J. Scheurich]

| Try cleaning your chroot.
> mock -scrub=all

This do not help on fedora 31 8-(

$  fedora-review -n vcglib
INFO: Processing local files: vcglib
INFO: Getting .spec and .srpm Urls from : Local files in /home/home/mufti
INFO:   --> SRPM url: file:///home/home/mufti/vcglib-1.0.1-1.src.rpm
INFO:   --> Spec url: file:///home/home/mufti/vcglib.spec
INFO: Using review directory: /home/home/mufti/review-vcglib
ERROR: Exception down the road... (logs in /root/.cache/fedora-review.log)

so long
MUFTI
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: fedora-review seam to not work 8-(

[J. Scheurich]

> What's your version of fedora-review? You should have 0.7.2
>
> Name : fedora-review
> Version  : 0.7.2
> Release  : 1.fc30
$ fedora-review -V
fedora-review version 0.7.2 65d36bb 2019-04-09 16:30:26 -0400
external plugins:
$ yum info fedora-review
...
Installed Packages
Name : fedora-review
Version  : 0.7.2
Release  : 2.fc31
Architecture : noarch
Size : 626 k
Source   : fedora-review-0.7.2-2.fc31.src.rpm

This seams to be release 2.fc31, not 1.fc30.

Should i try to install 1.fc30 ?

so long
MUFTI
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

fedora-review seam to not work 8-(

[J. Scheurich]

Hi,

(Since the last update ?) fedora-review seams to not work:

I am using

Spec URL: ftp://ftp.ourproject.org/pub/wdune/vcglib.spec
SRPM URL: ftp://ftp.ourproject.org/pub/wdune/vcglib-1.0.1-1.src.rpm

as a testcase.

$ fedora-review -n vcglib
INFO: Processing local files: vcglib
INFO: Getting .spec and .srpm Urls from : Local files in /home/home/mufti
INFO:   --> SRPM url: file:///home/home/mufti/vcglib-1.0.1-1.src.rpm
INFO:   --> Spec url: file:///home/home/mufti/vcglib.spec
INFO: Using review directory: /home/home/mufti/review-vcglib
ERROR: Exception down the road... (logs in
/home/mufti/.cache/fedora-review.log)

$ less /home/mufti/.cache/fedora-review.log
...
08-05 17:51 root INFO   --> SRPM url:
file:///home/home/mufti/vcglib-1.0.1-1.src.rpm
08-05 17:51 root INFO   --> Spec url:
file:///home/home/mufti/vcglib.spec
08-05 17:51 root DEBUG    find_urls completed: 0.010
08-05 17:51 root INFO Using review directory:
/home/home/mufti/review-vcglib
08-05 17:51 root DEBUG    Avoiding init of working mock root
08-05 17:51 root DEBUG    Url download completed: 2.384
08-05 15:51 root DEBUG    Exception down the road...
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "/usr/lib/python3.7/site-packages/FedoraReview/review_helper.py",
line 236, in run
    self._do_run(outfile)
  File "/usr/lib/python3.7/site-packages/FedoraReview/review_helper.py",
line 226, in _do_run
    self._do_report(outfile)
  File "/usr/lib/python3.7/site-packages/FedoraReview/review_helper.py",
line 99, in _do_report
...

As far as i understand python, a "BaseException" occored in
self._do_run(outfile):

$ less +232 /usr/lib/python3.7/site-packages/FedoraReview/review_helper.py
   self.log.debug("fedora-review %s %s started", __version__,
BUILD_FULL)
    self.log.debug("Command  line: %s", " ".join(sys.argv))
    try:
    rcode = 0
    self._do_run(outfile)
    except ReviewError as err:
    if isinstance(err, SpecParseReviewError):
    nvr = _Nvr(self.bug.get_name())
    result = SimpleTestResult(
    "SpecFileParseError", "Can't parse the spec file: ",
str(err)
    )
    write_xml_report(nvr, [result])
    self.log.debug("ReviewError: %s", str(err), exc_info=True)
    if not err.silent:
    msg = "ERROR: " + str(err)
    if err.show_logs:
    msg += " (logs in " + Settings.session_log + ")"
    self.log.error(msg)
    rcode = err.exitcode
    except BaseException:
    self.log.debug("Exception down the road...", exc_info=True)
    self.log.error(
    "Exception down the road... (logs in %s)",
Settings.session_log
...

What i am doing wrong ?

so long
MUFTI
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Offering do-anything-swap in exchange to white_dune sponsoring

[J. Scheurich]

On 30.07.19 00:55, Alexander Ploumistos wrote:
> Hello mufti,
>
>
> On Mon, Jul 29, 2019 at 9:56 PM J. Scheurich  wrote:
>> What can you do in a informal review more than sending comments with
>> found potential problems ?
> Helpful comments such as those you've made on Bugzilla are always welcome.
> You may have noticed some people using a template when reviewing
> packages, one that covers all possible aspects of a package. This
> template is produced by the fedora-review tool, but you can always do
> the same work manually, as long as you go over the same areas
> (fedora-review and the template really help the reviewer keep track of
> things).
>
> In December, Michael Schwendt gave you the link to the package review process:
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Package_Review_Process
> This page explains how things should proceed, what each interested
> party needs to do and it contains a few relevant links.

In short:

| Review the package ..
| * Go through the MUST items listed in Review Guidelines
<https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:ReviewGuidelines> .
| * Go through the SHOULD items in Review Guidelines
<https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:ReviewGuidelines> .
| * The FedoraReview <https://fedorahosted.org/FedoraReview/> tool
(packaged as fedora-review) can help to automate this process.
| * Include the text of your review in a comment in the ticket. For easy
readability, simply use a regular
| comment instead of an attachment.

I didnt't include the text of the review, cause i thought, potential
problems has to be solved first 8-(
Sometine others (who can do a real review), added the text of the
review, some others wrote
something like:

"I have manually reviewed this package, and it is APPROVED. It conforms
to the Fedora Packaging Guidelines, and is under an acceptible license.
It builds cleanly in Rawhide."

Is it ok for a informal review, to send the text of the review, if some
other reviewer also included
the text of the review ?

so long
MUFTI

 


so long
MUFTI
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Offering do-anything-swap in exchange to white_dune sponsoring

[J. Scheurich]

>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1669913
>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1672861
>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1672862
>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1672863
>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1684936
>>
>>
> I wouldn't class any of those as informal reviews.
> ___

What can you do in a informal review more than sending comments with
found potential problems ?

so long
MUFTI
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Offering do-anything-swap in exchange to white_dune sponsoring

[J. Scheurich]

>> Cause i can't offer a review-swap (cause i am not in the packager
>> group), i offer a do-anything-swap in exchange to white_dune fedora
>> sponsoring.
> Posting links to the informal reviews you completed would be the best
> way to attract potential sponsors, but I cannot find any.
>
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1669913
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1672861
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1672862
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1672863
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1684936

so long
MUFTI
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Offering do-anything-swap in exchange to white_dune sponsoring

[J. Scheurich]

> > Cause i can't offer a review-swap (cause i am not in the packager
> > group), i offer a do-anything-swap in exchange to white_dune fedora
> > sponsoring.
>
> Posting links to the informal reviews you completed would be the best
> way to attract potential sponsors, but I cannot find any.
>
> Showing your understanding of Packaging Guidelines is I think
> essential to becoming a Fedora packager, so please do some informal
> reviews first.

I already done some informal reviews, but nothing happens 8-(
What is wrong in offering something like debugging ?

so long
MUFTI
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Offering do-anything-swap in exchange to white_dune sponsoring

[J. Scheurich]

Hi,

Cause i can't offer a review-swap (cause i am not in the packager
group), i offer a do-anything-swap in exchange to white_dune fedora
sponsoring.

I have some experience in writing C, C++, java, awk, lex/yacc and
shellscript, but i don't have enough time to write a complex 30
lines program like white_dune from scratch.
Creating a prototype or a add-on would be possible.
Or debugging a big program using gdb on a clear error would be great.
The tasks i worked on are X3D, OpenGL/jogl and numerics, but i would
debug any task...

so long
MUFTI


___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Added Qt usage example to white_dune

[J. Scheurich]

Hi,

Added a Qt export example to white_dune 1.222 as

wdune-1.222/docs/export_example_c++/qt_opengl_example/

So you can click/drag your 3D application part in white_dune
and click/drag your 2D application part in qtcreator/qtdesigner.

A screenshot of the example is here:

https://heise.cloudimg.io/width/656/q75.png-lossy-75.webp-lossy-75.foil1/_www-heise-de_/download/media/white-dune-18741/qtexport_1-1-30.png

white_dune has no sponsoring for fedora, but you can always use the
fedora 30
port on https://wdune.ourproject.org/

so long
MUFTI
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Added simple 3D game to wdune opengl_examples subpackage

[J. Scheurich]

Hi,

I added the VRML97 based "Tux warbird" 3D game to the white_dune
opengl_examples
subpackage.
This adds C++ code to the VRML-Script nodes in a way that makes it
possible to still
use warbird.wrl in a VRML97 browser like FreeWRL or (webgl based) firefox.
The resulting interactive binary only links glut, OpenGL libs, libpng
and libjpeg.
This is usefull, if you have no VRML/X3D browser (default in fedora) or
no connection
to the internet.

The white_dune package is still missing sponsoring...

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1658153

If you want to test the binary, you need to install

ftp://ftp.ourproject.org/pub/wdune/wdune-opengl-examples-1.179-3.fc31.x86_64.rpm

and

ftp://ftp.ourproject.org/pub/wdune/wdune-1.179-3.fc31.x86_64.rpm

so long
MUFTI

___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: how to create Makefile

[J. Scheurich]

I'm trying to compile the program olive with the help of a spec file [1], which 
unfortunately fails when creating the Makefile.
Have somebody a idea or solution ?


qt projects usally uses "qmake" if you have a .pro project file.

https://doc.qt.io/archives/3.3/qmake-manual-3.html

so long
MUFTI
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

white_dune reached version 1.0 (need sponsoring)

[J. Scheurich]

Hi,

white_dune (3D modeler and animation-tool) reached version 1 cause it could
render any visible node of VRML87/X3D 3.3.

It needs fedora sponsoring.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1658153

Petr Mensik  wrote


| find anyone to sponsor your account on devel list. I think this
package is
| quite good and would be nice to have, especially to Games developers.
I would
| sponsor you myself, but not yet able to sponsor.


vcglib

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1677989

(nedded by white_dune) also needs fedora sponsoring.

so long
MUFTI
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Strange C++ error with GCC 9.0.1

[J. Scheurich]

g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -DUSE_OPENSSL -DPCAPPLAY -DRTP_STREAM -DUSE_SCTP
-DHAVE_EPOLL -I. -I./include   -D__LINUX -I./include -Wall -pedantic
-O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Werror=format-security -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2
-Wp,-D_GLIBCXX_ASSERTIONS -fexceptions -fstack-protector-strong
-grecord-gcc-switches -specs=/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/redhat-hardened-cc1
-specs=/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/redhat-annobin-cc1 -m64 -mtune=generic
-fasynchronous-unwind-tables -fstack-clash-protection -fcf-protection
-c -o src/sipp-sipp.o `test -f 'src/sipp.cpp' || echo
'./'`src/sipp.cpp
In file included from ./include/strings.hpp:24,
  from ./include/sipp.hpp:484,
  from src/sipp.cpp:41:
/usr/include/c++/9/cstddef:52:8: error: expected unqualified-id before
string constant
52 | extern "C++"
   |^
make[1]: *** [Makefile:1768: src/sipp-sipp.o] Error 1


https://en.cppreference.com/w/cpp/language/language_linkage
...
| Only two language linkages are guaranteed to be supported:
| 1) "C++", the default language linkage.
| 2) "C", which makes it possible to link with functions written in the
| C programming language, and to define, in a C++ program, functions
| that can be called from the modules written in C.

Cause  'extern "C++"' is the default for C++ and the compiler is g++,
you should be able to simply delete 'extern "C++"', is should have no
effect.

so long
MUFTI
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Introduction

[J. Scheurich]

Hello! I'm Ruchit Vithani, a sophomore from DAIICT gandhinagar, India.
I'm new to this community and would like to contribute. Will someone
help me get started?


If you want to add a package to fedora, you have first to ask for a review.

Read https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Package_Review_Process

so long
MUFTI
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Uninstallable aqsis-core in fedora 30

[J. Scheurich]

Hi,

It looks like "aqsis-core" is not installable in fedora 30 (x86_64)

# dnf install aqsis-core
Last metadata expiration check: 0:03:47 ago on Sat 09 Mar 2019 04:19:02
PM CET.
Error:
 Problem: conflicting requests
  - nothing provides libboost_system.so.1.66.0()(64bit) needed by
aqsis-core-1.8.2-31.fc29.x86_64
  - nothing provides libboost_thread.so.1.66.0()(64bit) needed by
aqsis-core-1.8.2-31.fc29.x86_64
  - nothing provides libboost_filesystem.so.1.66.0()(64bit) needed by
aqsis-core-1.8.2-31.fc29.x86_64
  - nothing provides libboost_regex.so.1.66.0()(64bit) needed by
aqsis-core-1.8.2-31.fc29.x86_64
  - nothing provides libboost_iostreams.so.1.66.0()(64bit) needed by
aqsis-core-1.8.2-31.fc29.x86_64
  - nothing provides libboost_wave.so.1.66.0()(64bit) needed by
aqsis-core-1.8.2-31.fc29.x86_64
(try to add '--skip-broken' to skip uninstallable packages)

I need aqsis-core (a renderer for .RIB files) as requirement for white_dune.

Who to ask ?

so long
MUFTI
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Looking for volunteers for a handful of Go package reviews

[J. Scheurich]

I have several Go packages in need of a review for the latest Rclone version.
I'm available for any review in exchange.

- golang-github-anacrolix-dms
   https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1684956


I would review it, but i am not in the packager group 8-(
All i can offer is a unofficial review in exchage to wdune fedora
sponsoring.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1658153

so long
MUFTI
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Expect nag email if you are maintaining a package in fedora with important/critical flaw open against it

[J. Scheurich]

Really nothing else to say here, apart from $SUBJECT.

Expect nag email if you are maintaining a package in fedora with 
important/critical flaw open against it

| ... Red Hat Product Security Team

Is this security related or can i nag about  the  FE-NEEDSPONSOR flag in
wdune ?

so long
MUFTI

___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Adding zstd support for mksquashfs

[J. Scheurich]

On Wed, 20 Feb 2019 10:15:13 +0100
Roberto Ragusa  wrote:


> squashfs is now supporting the interesting zstd compression algorithm,
> but the mksquashfs tool in Fedora doesn't support zstd.
...
> Which is the correct way to get this into Fedora?

You have to create a RPM package

https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/

and use the review process

https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Package_Review_Process

It can be take time to get fedora sponsored...

so long
MUFTI
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

review request: vcglib

[J. Scheurich]

Hi,

I entered a review request for the vcglib library.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1677989

Despite it's name, this is not a real .a/.so library.
It is just a huge collection of C++ header files.

Unfortunatly i can not offer a official review swap, cause i am not in
the packager group.

A package, that requires this library is wdune

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1658153

which needs fedora sponsoring...

so long
MUFTI
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Review swap: newsboat

[J. Scheurich]

Hi,


I have packaged terminal RSS/Atom reader newsboat [1] for Fedora, and I
would like to have it reviewed [2] (ideally before F30 beta). Any
volunteers?


I would review it (unclear, if i have the rights (i have a fedora
account, but i don't know, if this is sufficent for a offical review))
in return for white_dune fedora sponsoring...

so long
MUFTI
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: compilation of mellowplayer fails on Fedora 30 with gcc-9.0.1 - error: redundant move in return statement [-Werror=redundant-move]

[J. Scheurich]

the compilation of mellowplayer-3.5.1 with gcc-9.0.1 fails on Fedora 30,
see the build.log [1]

Fedora Bugzilla [2] - -Wredundant-move gives false positives in C++11 mode

[1] https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//work/tasks/2212/32602212/build.log


BUILDSTDERR: 
/builddir/build/BUILD/MellowPlayer-402e336880f94853a541fc3e773e593b584fe8e0/src/3rdparty/boost-di-extensions/Factory.hpp:31:24:
   required from here
BUILDSTDERR: 
/builddir/build/BUILD/MellowPlayer-402e336880f94853a541fc3e773e593b584fe8e0/src/3rdparty/boost-di-extensions/Factory.hpp:45:32:
 error: redundant move in return statement [-Werror=redundant-move]
BUILDSTDERR: 
/builddir/build/BUILD/MellowPlayer-402e336880f94853a541fc3e773e593b584fe8e0/src/3rdparty/boost-di-extensions/Factory.hpp:45:32:
 note: remove 'std::move' call
BUILDSTDERR: cc1plus: error: unrecognized command line option 
'-Wno-c++1z-extensions' [-Werror]
BUILDSTDERR: cc1plus: error: unrecognized command line option 
'-Wno-unused-private-field' [-Werror]
BUILDSTDERR: cc1plus: all warnings being treated as errors
BUILDSTDERR: make[2]: *** [src/main/CMakeFiles/MellowPlayer.dir/build.make:150: 
src/main/CMakeFiles/MellowPlayer.dir/Program.cpp.o] Error 1
BUILDSTDERR: make[1]: *** [CMakeFiles/Makefile2:515: 
src/main/CMakeFiles/MellowPlayer.dir/all] Error 2
BUILDSTDERR: make: *** [Makefile:133: all] Error 2
RPM build errors:
BUILDSTDERR: error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.CD4l4Z (%build)
BUILDSTDERR: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.CD4l4Z (%build)
Child return code was: 1
EXCEPTION: [Error()]
Traceback (most recent call last):

it looks lie the options  -Wno-c++1z-extensions and
-Wno-unused-private-field' are wrong

...

UILDSTDERR: 
/builddir/build/BUILD/MellowPlayer-402e336880f94853a541fc3e773e593b584fe8e0/src/3rdparty/boost-di-extensions/Factory.hpp:31:24:
   required from here
BUILDSTDERR: 
/builddir/build/BUILD/MellowPlayer-402e336880f94853a541fc3e773e593b584fe8e0/src/3rdparty/boost-di-extensions/Factory.hpp:45:32:
 error: redundant move in return statement [-Werror=redundant-move]
BUILDSTDERR:45 | return std::move(object);
BUILDSTDERR:   |^

https://stackoverflow.com/questions/9532608/is-returning-with-stdmove-sensible-in-the-case-of-multiple-return-statements

For local variables, there's no need to |std::move| them in the |return|
statement most of the time^† , since the language actually demands that
this happens automatically:

||


___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: undefined symbol: shm_open (ppc64le and aarch64)

[J. Scheurich]

| One of my packages failed the mass rebuild, but only on ppc64le and

aarch64. The error they both hit is this:

Error: package or namespace load failed for 'BiocParallel' in
dyn.load(file, DLLpath = DLLpath, ...):
  unable to load shared object
'/builddir/build/BUILDROOT/R-BiocParallel-1.16.5-1.fc30.ppc64le/usr/lib64/R/library/BiocParallel/libs/BiocParallel.so':

/builddir/build/BUILDROOT/R-BiocParallel-1.16.5-1.fc30.ppc64le/usr/lib64/R/library/BiocParallel/libs/BiocParallel.so:
undefined symbol: shm_open
Error: loading failed


On ububtu (ARM) ...

$ for i in /lib/aarch64-linux-gnu/*.so ; do echo $i;nm -D $i | grep
shm_open; done | more
...
/lib/aarch64-linux-gnu/librt-2.27.so
3f28 T shm_open

It looks like you have to link -lrt

so long
MUFTI
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: NeuroFedora review swaps

[J. Scheurich]

If you've submitted a review ticket for wdune already, I will be happy
to review it and provide comments.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1658153

so long
MUFTI
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: how can i compile against zlib system library

[J. Scheurich]

i want to compile helm[1] for Fedora 29, but i want to compile it against the 
zlib system library.


I added in helm/standalone/builds/linux/Makefile
...
JUCE_CXXFLAGS += ... -fpermissive
...
JUCE_LDFLAGS +=  ... -lz 

and the error you told about vanished - but the rpm do not completed 8-(

so long
MUFTI
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Asking for a review swap Was: Why no wdune sponsoring ?

[J. Scheurich]

> I have looked at your spec/srpm and it needs much improvement, 

What can be improvided ?
The srpm produces a valid rpm on all architecures,
all tips of 

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1653481

has been followed.

so long
MUFTI
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Asking for a review swap Was: Why no wdune sponsoring ?

[J. Scheurich]

Asking for a review swap is usually done as a
post to this very "devel" mailing list, and it includes the package
name, bugzilla link, and which kinds of packages you can review in
return.


package  name: wdune (whitr_dune)
bugzilla link:   https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1658153
I have experience in C, C++, java, sh, OpenGL, X11, awk, rpm...

so long
MUFTI
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Why no wdune sponsoring ?

[J. Scheurich]

LMGTFY (fedora review swap )


https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/thread/5OPPTTNKQF2S5PUOX4HNAW5B7R4UFREU/




This review ends with

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=557546

| Fedora Update System 2010-03-23 23:30:09 UTC

| telepathy-sunshine-0.1.6-1.fc13 has been pushed to the Fedora 13 
stable repository.  If problems still

| persist, please make note of it in this bug report.

Are there any other review requests which can return sponsorship ?

Googling "fedora review swap sponsor" shows nothing interesting 8-(

so long
MUFTI
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Why no wdune sponsoring ?

[J. Scheurich]

Hi,

Are there any tips how to get wdune fedora sponsoring ?

What to do ?
Propose a review swap , you review a package for other and other review
your package and sponsor / mentor you .


How to initialise a review swap ?
Is there a mailing list or something to initialise review swaps ?

Are there any lists with potential review swap ?
Most people which need a review also need sponsoring by themselves, or 
am i wrong ?


so long
MUFTI
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Why no wdune sponsoring ?

[J. Scheurich]

Hi,

Are there any tips how to get wdune fedora sponsoring ?

We are working years on free software, but the distributors simply 
ignore it

(or worse) use a more than 10 years old version (like in debian/ubuntu) 8-(

What is wrong with wdune ?

It uses old technologies like motif or X3D.
Motif has the advantage that the 2D-GUI did not change over the years
(a lot of interesting software under Linux died from changing versions of
QT or gtk for example).
X3D has been superseded by webgl, but X3D can be displayed via webgl
(X_ITE or x3dom).

What need to be done, to bring wdune to fedora ?
If i get no fedora sponsoring, are there some volunteers to add wdune to 
fedora ?


It looks like, is not much work, it looks like wdune passed the review 
process:


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1658153

What to do ?

so long
MUFTI
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Who is the fedora sponsor for aqsis ?

[J. Scheurich]

Hi,

Still searching for a wdune fedora sponsor.
Who is the fedora sponsor for aqsis ?
wdune (white_dune) can convert VRML/X3D to a RIB file, which can
be used with aqsis to create images (the images can be concatinated
to build a movie).

so long
MUFTI
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Introducing white_dune

[J. Scheurich]

Hi,

Cause wdune/white_dune still needs sponsoring, i need to indroduce it.

white_dune is a graphical VRML97/X3D editor, simple 3D modeller,
animation tool, and VRML97/X3DV commandline compiler in development.

With white_dune you can create/change 3D objects and animate them
(in a easy way if you choose the -4kids GUI).
The result can be shown in any webgl enabled web browser or can be
converted to the RIB format for movie creation.

The 3D Modelling features are NURBS, Subdivison, Extrude face,
convex hull, skin and bones (via the HAnim X3D nodes),
Constructive Solid Geometry and Superformula based modelling.
With the Superformula you can create symetric shapes with only
20 parameters.

Beside VRML97/X3D and RIB, white_dune can write C/C++ OpenGL
or java JOGL programs with the animation.

White_dune comes with a second GUI ("4kids") for beginners/kids.
A example for a animation with the scenes made by kids in the age
between 7 and 12 is
https://wdune.ourproject.org/examples/stara2006_2007.html

With a expensive graphicscard like Nvidia Quadro white_dune support
shutter glasses.

Cause VRML97/X3D is a multimedia format, white_dune has dependencies
for image/movie/sound editor programs like gimp (or pinta for dune -4kids),
cinelerra or audacity.
But there is no movieeditor for MPEG 1 (like cinelerra) in fedora, or
am i wrong ?

so long
MUFTI
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

How to use %license: with a license file ?

[J. Scheurich]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1653481

COPYING.txt must be installed with %license not %doc.

But %License: only accepts things like GPLv3+ or am i wrong ?

so long
MUFTI
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Need help with Add Package to Source Code Management (SCM) system

[J. Scheurich]

$ fedpkg --name wdune-0.99-1.pl1216 request-repo 31403246
Could not execute request_repo: A Bugzilla bug is required on new 
repository requests


What bug is needed ?


The review bug that you created when getting the package reviewed:

https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Join_the_package_collection_maintainers#Create_Your_Review_Request 



I don't see one for wdune though so I guess you haven't had it
reviewed yet? 


I have reviewed it, but with the name "white_dune":

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1653481

Should i add a review request with the name "wdune" ?

so long
MUFTI
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Need help with Add Package to Source Code Management (SCM) system

[J. Scheurich]

Hi,

I need help:

https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Join_the_package_collection_maintainers#Add_Package_to_Source_Code_Management_.28SCM.29_system_and_Set_Owner

I tried:

$ fedpkg --release f29 build --scratch --srpm 
rpmbuild/SRPMS/wdune-0.99-1.pl1216.fc29.src.rpm

.
Created task: 31403246

$ fedpkg --name wdune-0.99-1.pl1216 request-repo 31403246
Could not execute request_repo: A Bugzilla bug is required on new 
repository requests


What bug is needed ?

so long
MUFTI
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Self Introduction: J."MUFTI" Scheurich

[J. Scheurich]

| I am a programmer/maintainer of white_dune and i am trying to include 
it into fedora.

You need to create a non-production (scratch) build which cannot be
released when building from a SRPM, like this:

$ fedpkg --release f29 build --scratch --srpm 
rpmbuild/SRPMS/wdune-0.99-1.pl1216.fc29.src.rpm
... 31390152 build (f29-candidate, wdune-0.99-1.pl1216.fc29.src.rpm) 
completed successfully


How to continue in order to include a white_dune package into fedora ?

so long
MUFTI
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Self Introduction: J."MUFTI" Scheurich

[J. Scheurich]

https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Join_the_package_collection_maintainers#Introduce_yourself

| When a new package maintainer joins the Fedora Project, we request 
that he/she introduces
| themselves on the Fedora devel 
 
mailing list.


I am a programmer/maintainer of white_dune ( 
http://wdune.ourproject.org/ ) and i am trying to

include it into fedora.

I got the following mail

basset  has sponsored you for membership in the 
cla_fpca
group of the Fedora account system. If applicable, this change should
propagate into the e-mail aliases and git repository within an hour.


but i don't know, if it is sufficent to build a fedora package.

Currently i have the following problem:

$ fedpkg --release f29 build --srpm 
rpmbuild/SRPMS/wdune-0.99-1.pl1216.fc29.src.rpm
Failed to get repository name from Git url or pushurl
[] 100% 00:00:46  22.25 MiB 489.29 KiB/sec
Building wdune-0.99-1.pl1216.fc29.src.rpm for f29-candidate
Created task: 31387399
Task info: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=31387399
Watching tasks (this may be safely interrupted)...
31387399 build (f29-candidate, wdune-0.99-1.pl1216.fc29.src.rpm): free
31387399 build (f29-candidate, wdune-0.99-1.pl1216.fc29.src.rpm): free -> 
FAILED: ActionNotAllowed: policy violation (build_from_srpm)
  0 free  0 open  0 done  1 failed

31387399 build (f29-candidate, wdune-0.99-1.pl1216.fc29.src.rpm) failed
$

Any ideas ?

so long
MUFTI
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org