Re: Orphaning packages (was LibreOffice packages)
I've picked up low-memory-monitor On 6/29/23 08:46, Neal Gompa wrote: On Thu, Jun 29, 2023 at 10:48 AM Bastien Nocera wrote: Hello, As part of the same process outlined in Matthias Clasen's "LibreOffice packages" email, my upstream and downstream work on desktop Bluetooth, multimedia applications (namely totem, rhythmbox and sound-juicer) and libfprint/fprintd is being stopped, and all the rest of my upstream and downstream work will be reassigned depending on Red Hat's own priorities, as I am transferred to another team. While it's possible that some of the maintenance will stay with me in the new team, I've not yet been told which team I would be joining. Here is a list of Fedora packages which I maintained or co-maintained which I won't be able to contribute to anymore: apfs-fuse bluez codespell eosrei-emojione-fonts geocode-glib gnome-bluetooth gnome-epub-thumbnailer gnome-kra-ora-thumbnailer gnome-user-share gom grilo grilo-plugins ifuse iio-sensor-proxy libfprint libglib-testing libimobiledevice libpeas libplist libportal libusbmuxd low-memory-monitor malcontent power-profiles-daemon sloccount switcheroo-control totem totem-pl-parser umockdev usbmuxd I've picked up libimobiledevice as I need it for Fedora Asahi work. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers
Would like to take**golang-github-lithammer-dedent and aqemu but I believe I still need a sponsor. Anyone willing to sponsor? On 6/9/23 07:24, Omair Majid wrote: Hi, Jens-Ulrik Petersen writes: What would be really helpful is to know how it compares with other Naskh fonts like Paktype (current default) and Nafees, and even Noto Nastaliq Urdu (they are all in Fedora 38). I lack the tools/skills/knowledge/jargon to describe the differences I see. Is there a guide for n00bs where they can read up on what sort of things to compare and how to describe those differences? Omair -- PGP Key: B157A9F0 (http://pgp.mit.edu/) Fingerprint = 9DB5 2F0B FD3E C239 E108 E7BD DF99 7AF8 B157 A9F0 ___ devel mailing list --devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email todevel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct:https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines:https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives:https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it:https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: What is Fedora?
I'm no lawyer here, and I've only worked with Linux for roughly 8 years now, but I find all of this GPL / redhat terms of agreement very confusing and seems at the face of it to be in conflict with each other. For example, Red Hat states: "If you use the Individual Developer Subscriptions for any other purposes or beyond the parameters described in these Program Terms, you are in violation of Red Hat’s Enterprise Agreement and are required to pay the Subscription fees that would apply to such use, in addition to any and all other remedies available to Red Hat under applicable law. Examples of such violations include, but are not limited to, ● using the Red Hat Subscription Services for Individual Development Use and/or Individual Production Use on more than sixteen (16) Physical or Virtual Nodes, or ● selling, distributing and/or rebranding the Red Hat Subscription Services (or any part thereof) contained in the Individual Developer Subscriptions. " However, the GPL section 4 seems to make pretty clear on how I can "convey verbatim copies" , allowing me to essentially copy/modify the built binaries and take those to any machines as I see fit. Although redhat provides a free Developer license and access to its source, all I could find with a Dev license was the iso image, either its very difficult to find, or does not exist and I don't believe access to an ISO complies with the GPL either, as the GPL guarantees access to the preferred form of work for the making of modifications to it. Even if redhat did in fact provide access to a git repo of some kind walled off by a user account and buried behind mouse clicks, would I still be able to compile and build rhel from source and run that on more then 16 machines? Or will I be in violation with Rhels terms and in for a potential lawsuit? On 6/21/23 14:45, JT wrote: There are mirrors online that you can pull from as well if you dont have an account or know someone who has an account. Or you can create a dev account with a throw away email to get the ISOs. I'll happily download any ISO you want. :P I know several people that their dev account is linked with their personal gmail account, but I havent created a new dev account in a while so IDK if they filter for domains. Red Hat has even released instructions on how you can run your own mirror. I believe you do need a RH login to access those instructions. https://access.redhat.com/solutions/23016 Example sources: https://archive.org/details/rhel-baseos-9.1-x86_64-dvd_202212 http://calipso.linux.it.umich.edu/pulp/isos/UM/Library/content/dist/rhel8/8/x86_64/baseos/iso/ If you're concerned about getting an ISO from anywhere other than RedHat.com, then I'd suggest you sign up for a free account with a fresh email account that is only used for your RH account. At the end of the day, the source will always be available in some form, Red Hat cannot violate the GPL without opening itself up to massive lawsuits. On Wed, Jun 21, 2023 at 5:27 PM Philip Wyett wrote: On Wed, 2023-06-21 at 17:18 -0400, JT wrote: > > > How are you downloading RHEL ISO images? > > I already sent you the URL in a prior response: > https://developers.redhat.com/products/rhel/download > > > Please do not tell me to take a deep breath and relax. Show some respect. > > I am being respectful, I've been trying to explain to you that this isn't anything to get > stressed out over. I've calmly addressed the questions you've raised. > What you are worried about is not possible because of the legal requirements of the GPL which Red > Hat has accepted by using GPL licensed code. > > You're stressing out over a non issue... you dont need to stress over this... aka... you can > relax... it's going to be ok. > > If me addressing your concerns and telling you that you dont need to worry is disrespectful... > well... I'm sorry that you think I'm being disrespectful. I'm trying to make you feel better by > explaining that you dont need to be worried. > I did say I tried this, but nobody is listening... Attached: One mage saying Download/Signup One image when you click on download at no cost and you need to login or create an account. Beauty of using clean VM's Regards Phil -- *** Playing the game for the games own sake. *** Associations: * Debian Maintainer (DM) * Fedora/EPEL Maintainer. * Contributor member of the AlmaLinux foundation. WWW: https://kathenas.org Buy Me a Coffee: https://www.buymeacoffee.com/kathenasorg Twitter: @kathenasorg Instagram: @kathenasorg IRC: kathenas GPG: 724AA9B52F024C8B ___ devel mailing list --devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email todevel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of
Re: Non-responsive maintainer check for deji - grads
Hello, I am interesting in maintaining this package(grads) if no one else will, but I require sponsorship since I am still new to this group. On 11/7/22 17:12, Orion Poplawski wrote: Non-responsive maintainer check for deji Mainly for grads: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2140875 But there is also an old bug for TexMaker: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2088781 Has anyone else heard from Deji? Is anyone else interested in taking over grads or TexMaker should it come to that? Thanks, Orion ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
