Re: Mass rebuild for f33-java11 side tag completed

2020-07-21 Thread Jiri Vanek
Hi! Side tag was merged, java-11-openjdk now should be system JDK. Don't hesitate to reach me if you encounter some misbehaving! J. On 7/11/20 10:24 AM, Jiri Vanek wrote: > Hello! > > toatal packages: 610 > passed: 427 > failed: 176 > > From the failures, there is 29 whi

Re: Mass rebuild for f33-java11 side tag completed

2020-07-21 Thread Jiri Vanek
Hi! Side tag was merged, java-11-openjdk now should be system JDK. Don't hesitate to reach me if you encounter some misbehaving! J. On 7/11/20 10:24 AM, Jiri Vanek wrote: > Hello! > > toatal packages: 610 > passed: 427 > failed: 176 > > From the failures, there is 29 whi

Re: [fedora-java] Re: Mass rebuild for f33-java11 side tag completed

2020-07-21 Thread Jiri Vanek
contriute, or sugest next steps here. I would liek to have it java-packaging gudelines change, and self-contained f33 change, but it may be to late. I see yo already track the Fabio's to-high bytecode issue, but my proposal is to prevent it in future. However, it do not seem to be facing to much symp

Re: [fedora-java] Re: Mass rebuild for f33-java11 side tag completed

2020-07-13 Thread Jiri Vanek
List Archives: > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > -- Jiri Vanek Senior QE engineer, OpenJDK QE lead, Mgr. Red Hat Czech jva...@redhat.comM: +420775390109 ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To u

Mass rebuild for f33-java11 side tag completed

2020-07-13 Thread Jiri Vanek
. Thoughts? J. -- Jiri Vanek Senior QE engineer, OpenJDK QE lead, Mgr. Red Hat Czech jva...@redhat.comM: +420775390109 ___ devel-announce mailing list -- devel-annou...@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-announce-le

Mass rebuild for f33-java11 side tag completed

2020-07-13 Thread Jiri Vanek
. Thoughts? J. -- Jiri Vanek Senior QE engineer, OpenJDK QE lead, Mgr. Red Hat Czech jva...@redhat.comM: +420775390109 ___ devel-announce mailing list -- devel-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-announce-le

Re: [fedora-java] Re: java stack is dead, long live the javastack (was "500 packages FTBFS in rawhide with java-11-openjdk as system JDK")

2020-07-01 Thread Jiri Vanek
On 7/1/20 4:09 PM, Fabio Valentini wrote: > On Wed, Jul 1, 2020 at 4:00 PM Jiri Vanek wrote: >> >> On 7/1/20 3:21 PM, Fabio Valentini wrote: >>> On Wed, Jul 1, 2020 at 3:09 PM Aleksandar Kurtakov >>> wrote: >>>> >>>> Fabi

Re: [fedora-java] Re: java stack is dead, long live the javastack (was "500 packages FTBFS in rawhide with java-11-openjdk as system JDK")

2020-07-01 Thread Jiri Vanek
; Fedora Code of Conduct: > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > List Archives: > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > -- Jiri Vanek Senio

Re: [fedora-java] Re: java stack is dead, long live the javastack (was "500 packages FTBFS in rawhide with java-11-openjdk as system JDK")

2020-06-30 Thread Jiri Vanek
On 6/29/20 1:59 PM, Aleksandar Kurtakov wrote: > > > On Mon, Jun 29, 2020 at 2:39 PM Jiri Vanek <mailto:jva...@redhat.com>> wrote: > > Current stats from my testing samples: > 408 failing > 263 passing > > > Are these nu

java stack is dead, long live the javastack (was "500 packages FTBFS in rawhide with java-11-openjdk as system JDK")

2020-06-29 Thread Jiri Vanek
it, and stat rebuilding on pretty fresh field J. -- Jiri Vanek Senior QE engineer, OpenJDK QE lead, Mgr. Red Hat Czech jva...@redhat.comM: +420775390109 ___ devel-announce mailing list -- devel-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send

java stack is dead, long live the javastack (was "500 packages FTBFS in rawhide with java-11-openjdk as system JDK")

2020-06-29 Thread Jiri Vanek
it, and stat rebuilding on pretty fresh field J. -- Jiri Vanek Senior QE engineer, OpenJDK QE lead, Mgr. Red Hat Czech jva...@redhat.comM: +420775390109 ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel

Re: Fedora 33 System-Wide Change proposal: Fedora-Retired-Packages

2020-06-16 Thread Jiri Vanek
ct.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > List Archives: > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > -- Jiri Vanek Senior QE engineer, OpenJDK QE lead, Mgr. Red Hat Czech jva...@redhat.com

Re: Fedora 33 Self-Contained Change proposal: Default animated background for Fedora Workstation

2020-06-16 Thread Jiri Vanek
gt; Fedora Code of Conduct: > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > List Archives: > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > --

Re: [fedora-java] Re: Announcement: Aim to remove libdb-java from Fedora-rawhide

2020-06-15 Thread Jiri Vanek
g_list_guidelines > List Archives: > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/java-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org > -- Jiri Vanek Senior QE engineer, OpenJDK QE lead, Mgr. Red Hat Czech jva...@redhat.comM: +420775390109 ___ devel maili

Re: 500 packages FTBFS in rawhide with java-11-openjdk as system JDK

2020-06-10 Thread Jiri Vanek
a.2C_eg_java-11-openjdk.29 Thanx for investigations! J. > > Reference here: > > https://bugs.mysql.com/bug.php?id=99750 > > Best regards, > Ondrej > > On Tue, Jun 9, 2020 at 6:42 PM Jiri Vanek <mailto:jva...@redhat.com>> wrote: > > On 6/9/20 5:

Re: 500 packages FTBFS in rawhide with java-11-openjdk as system JDK

2020-06-09 Thread Jiri Vanek
On 6/9/20 5:07 PM, Fabio Valentini wrote: > On Tue, Jun 9, 2020 at 4:52 PM Fabio Valentini wrote: >> >> On Tue, Jun 9, 2020 at 4:05 PM Jiri Vanek wrote: >>> Please see >>> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Java11#common_issues_packagers_can_face_and_gathe

Re: [fedora-java] 500 packages FTBFS in rawhide with java-11-openjdk as system JDK

2020-06-09 Thread Jiri Vanek
ore information. Very bad timing:( I hope it will get fixed asap. I'm really sorry for troubles! J. > > On Tue, Jun 9, 2020 at 5:05 PM Jiri Vanek <mailto:jva...@redhat.com>> wrote: > > > > Please see > &g

500 packages FTBFS in rawhide with java-11-openjdk as system JDK

2020-06-09 Thread Jiri Vanek
yyang maven-plugin-testing maven-plugin-tools maven-wagon maven2 modello plexus-active-collections plexus-component-api plexus-containers zbyszekclosure-compiler diffoscope gnulib hdfview jblas jhdf5 js-zlib neurord nom-tam-fits Thanx! J. -- Jiri Vanek Senior QE engineer, OpenJDK QE

500 packages FTBFS in rawhide with java-11-openjdk as system JDK

2020-06-09 Thread Jiri Vanek
yyang maven-plugin-testing maven-plugin-tools maven-wagon maven2 modello plexus-active-collections plexus-component-api plexus-containers zbyszekclosure-compiler diffoscope gnulib hdfview jblas jhdf5 js-zlib neurord nom-tam-fits Thanx! J. -- Jiri Vanek Senior QE engineer, OpenJDK QE

Re: F33 system wide change, java-11-openjdk as system jdk

2020-05-19 Thread Jiri Vanek
, future steps will be based. Thanx! J. On 4/30/20 6:29 PM, Jiri Vanek wrote: > Hello fellow java package maintainers! > > We are planning to bump the JDK from java-1.8.0-openjdk to java-11-openjdk > for F33. Please see > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Java11 > > Sho

Re: F33 system wide change, java-11-openjdk as system jdk

2020-05-19 Thread Jiri Vanek
, future steps will be based. Thanx! J. On 4/30/20 6:29 PM, Jiri Vanek wrote: > Hello fellow java package maintainers! > > We are planning to bump the JDK from java-1.8.0-openjdk to java-11-openjdk > for F33. Please see > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Java11 > > Sho

Re: F33 system wide change, java-11-openjdk as system jdk

2020-05-04 Thread Jiri Vanek
On 5/4/20 12:59 PM, Iñaki Ucar wrote: > On Mon, 4 May 2020 at 11:22, Jiri Vanek wrote: >> >>> Thanks, but as I said above, the RStudio rpms don't pull the JVM, >>> because it's not required at runtime. So I suppose that, beyond fixing >>> the java-devel ve

Re: F33 system wide change, java-11-openjdk as system jdk

2020-05-04 Thread Jiri Vanek
On 5/4/20 11:15 AM, Iñaki Ucar wrote: > Hi, thanks for your assistance, comments inline: > > On Mon, 4 May 2020 at 10:48, Jiri Vanek wrote: >> >> Generally, no program can say, that do not support jdk11, because any >> javac/java application can be >> *hacked* t

Re: F33 system wide change, java-11-openjdk as system jdk

2020-05-04 Thread Jiri Vanek
_64.cfg . >> Eg: >> >> sudo cp downloaded-fedora-32-x86_64.cfg >> /etc/mock/jvanek-java11-fedora-32-x86_64.cfg >>or >> cp downloaded-fedora-32-x86_64.cfg >> ~/.config/mock/jvanek-java11-fedora-32-x86_64.cfg >>then >> # change spe

F33 system wide change, java-11-openjdk as system jdk

2020-04-30 Thread Jiri Vanek
Hello fellow java package maintainers! We are planning to bump the JDK from java-1.8.0-openjdk to java-11-openjdk for F33. Please see https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Java11 Short Story: * if you have some java package, be aware that we are bumping JDK in rawhide * Ensure your package

F33 system wide change, java-11-openjdk as system jdk

2020-04-30 Thread Jiri Vanek
Hello fellow java package maintainers! We are planning to bump the JDK from java-1.8.0-openjdk to java-11-openjdk for F33. Please see https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Java11 Short Story: * if you have some java package, be aware that we are bumping JDK in rawhide * Ensure your package

F33 system wide change, java-11-openjdk as system jdk

2020-04-30 Thread Jiri Vanek
Hello fellow java package maintainers! We are planning to bump the JDK from java-1.8.0-openjdk to java-11-openjdk for F33. Please see https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Java11 Short Story: * if you have some java package, be aware that we are bumping JDK in rawhide * Ensure your package

Re: Fedora 33 System-Wide Change proposal: java-11-openjdk as system JDK in F33

2020-03-30 Thread Jiri Vanek
Sounds like good idea..the way how to go. Only I'm not familiar with how it works. -- Jiri Vanek Senior QE engineer, OpenJDK QE lead, Mgr. Red Hat Czech jva...@redhat.comM: +420775390109 ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproj

Re: Fedora 33 System-Wide Change proposal: java-11-openjdk as system JDK in F33

2020-03-30 Thread Jiri Vanek
On 3/30/20 5:26 PM, Fabio Valentini wrote: > On Mon, Mar 30, 2020 at 4:05 PM Ben Cotton wrote: >> >> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Java11 . >> >> == Summary == >> Update the system JDK in Fedora from java-1.8.0-openjdk to java-11-openjdk. >> >&g

Re: Fedora 33 System-Wide Change proposal: java-11-openjdk as system JDK in F33

2020-03-30 Thread Jiri Vanek
> me. Sure. If I did, then not intentionally. By jira ticket in the above I had in mind general ticket on pagure or similarly. The word jira did not belonged here. fixed the doc. > Thanx! thanx a lot, J. -- Jiri Vanek Senior QE engineer, OpenJDK QE lead, Mgr. Red Hat Czech jva...@r

Re: [fedora-java] Re: Switching Maven and Ant to OpenJDK 11

2019-10-29 Thread Jiri Vanek
ee and open support, provided by project groups, which consists from nearly all oepnjdk8 interested corporations, and namely RH, which is Openjdk8 project lead, and hundreds of community members. Please really do not spread miss-informations like this. J. > -- Jiri Vanek Senior

Re: [fedora-java] Re: Switching Maven and Ant to OpenJDK 11

2019-10-26 Thread Jiri Vanek
On 10/26/19 4:33 PM, Neal Gompa wrote: > On Sat, Oct 26, 2019 at 9:53 AM Jiri Vanek wrote: >> >> any package can switch to jdk11, but sysem jdk should be jdk8, at least for >> some more time... >> > > If anything, we're late to the party of moving to JDK 11

Re: Switching Maven and Ant to OpenJDK 11

2019-10-26 Thread Jiri Vanek
va works in this regard, but since > this is the default > stream etc., wouldn't it be wise to coordinate such change with a general > OpenJDK 11 default Fedora > system wide change? > > E.g. would the dependent OpenJDK 8 packages still build in stable releases if > this chan

Re: Fedora 31 System-Wide Change proposal (late): No i686 Repositories

2019-07-15 Thread Jiri Vanek
ists.fedoraproject.org > Fedora Code of Conduct: > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > List Archives: > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org >

Re: Fedora 31 System-Wide Change proposal (late): No i686 Repositories

2019-07-15 Thread Jiri Vanek
t.org > To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org > Fedora Code of Conduct: > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > List Archives: > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/arch

Re: [fesco] Updated FTBFS package policy

2018-05-28 Thread Jiri Vanek
/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/P3KFTJMDNO42POS5N3Z4UXDNPFGAQH73/ -- Jiri Vanek Senior QE engineer, OpenJDK QE lead, Mgr. Red Hat Czech jva...@redhat.comM: +420775390109 ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe

Re: F28 Self Contained Change: java-openjdk 10 - rolling release for Short Term Support releases of OpenJDK

2018-04-17 Thread Jiri Vanek
On 04/17/2018 05:38 PM, Jiri Vanek wrote: On 04/15/2018 11:18 AM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: Note - page was updated for what you asked. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/java-openjdk-10 Dont hesitate toask for more :) TY! J. On Wed, Apr 11, 2018 at 02:58:56PM +0200, Jan

Re: F28 Self Contained Change: java-openjdk 10 - rolling release for Short Term Support releases of OpenJDK

2018-04-17 Thread Jiri Vanek
ttps://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/java-openjdk-10 Owner(s): * Jiri Vanek OpenJDK have release cadence of 6 months. but 3/4 of them are Short Term Supported for 6 months only. This package is designed to harbore them. Currently it is build on openJDK 10. LTSs (next is 11) will go a

Re: Orphaning openjfx

2018-03-22 Thread Jiri Vanek
will be with us for some time. Again, thank you very much for your passion on this battlefield. J. On 03/21/2018 10:28 PM, Jonny Heggheim wrote: Hi, I do not have time maintaining openjfx, it would be better if is maintained by someone that can give it more love than me. Jonny -- Jiri

Re: [ACTION NEEDED] Missing BuildRequires: gcc/gcc-c++

2018-02-20 Thread Jiri Vanek
On 02/20/2018 01:02 PM, Zdenek Dohnal wrote: On 02/18/2018 06:09 PM, Igor Gnatenko wrote: List of packages and respective maintainers: https://ignatenkobrain.fedorapeople.org/gcc-removal-pkgs.txt Done in packages where I am admin. TY! J. ___

Re: Incomaptible changes in new package for f27

2017-10-10 Thread Jiri Vanek
On 10/10/2017 01:44 PM, Michael Schwendt wrote: On Tue, 10 Oct 2017 13:29:19 +0200, Jiri Vanek wrote: Hello all! I seek advice how to proceed with following situation. There is new package for f27 - java-9-openjdk. The issue is, RPM do not like change of directory to symlink which

Incomaptible changes in new package for f27

2017-10-10 Thread Jiri Vanek
yway, what are general thoughts? J. -- Jiri Vanek Senior QE engineer, OpenJDK QE lead, Mgr. Red Hat Czech jva...@redhat.comM: +420775390109 ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: F27 Self Contained Change: Decouple system java setting from java command setting

2017-06-20 Thread Jiri Vanek
approval: N/A (not needed for this Change) -- Jiri Vanek Senior QE engineer, OpenJDK QE lead, Mgr. Red Hat Czech jva...@redhat.comM: +420775390109 ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le

Re: F27 Self Contained Change: Java 9

2017-04-20 Thread Jiri Vanek
d an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org -- Jiri Vanek Senior QE engineer, OpenJDK QE lead, Mgr. Red Hat Czech jva...@redhat.comM: +420775390109 ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email t

Re: Creating an new update is failing

2016-12-01 Thread Jiri Vanek
On 12/01/2016 10:55 AM, Jiri Vanek wrote: On 11/30/2016 07:10 PM, Patrick マルタインアンドレアス Uiterwijk wrote: Hi, Hello, I'm trying to create a new update and I'm getting this error: Builds : Unable to create update. Parent instance is not bound to a Session; lazy load operation of attribute

Re: Creating an new update is failing

2016-12-01 Thread Jiri Vanek
On 11/30/2016 07:10 PM, Patrick マルタインアンドレアス Uiterwijk wrote: Hi, Hello, I'm trying to create a new update and I'm getting this error: Builds : Unable to create update. Parent instance is not bound to a Session; lazy load operation of attribute 'release' cannot proceed The build looks

Re: No mass rebuild in Fedora 25

2016-05-02 Thread Jiri Vanek
Hello! this link > [1] https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/teams/fesco/fesco.2016-01-08-17.22.html Do not explain more about the missing mass rebuild. Are there more infomration about? [2] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/25/Schedule Thanx! J. -- devel mailing list

Re: Orphaning jasperreports

2015-06-22 Thread Jiri Vanek
On 06/22/2015 02:56 PM, gil wrote: HI I have intention to orphaning/retire jasperreports [1] , because it fails build [2] with new batik (1.8) and newer release use non free itext 5.x library. [1] https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/jasperreports/ [2]

Re: review swap

2015-06-16 Thread Jiri Vanek
On 06/16/2015 05:16 PM, gil wrote: hi I'm working for upgrade springframework-batch (spring-batch) [1]. There are still some packages under review: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1228203 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1228503

Re: F22 System Wide Change: Legacy implementations of the Java platform in Fedora

2015-02-27 Thread Jiri Vanek
On 02/26/2015 02:54 PM, Miloslav Trmač wrote: = Proposed System Wide Change: Legacy implementations of the Java platform in Fedora = https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/LegacyJDKsInFedora == Detailed Description == This is no real work proposal. Stepping back, I’m not sure this has been

Re: F22 System Wide Change: Legacy implementations of the Java platform in Fedora

2015-02-27 Thread Jiri Vanek
in Fedora On 02/24/2015 05:04 AM, Jaroslav Reznik wrote: = Proposed System Wide Change: Legacy implementations of the Java platform in Fedora = https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/LegacyJDKsInFedora Change owner(s): Jiri Vanek jva...@redhat.com Currently Fedora supports one main Java runtime and Java

Re: F22 System Wide Change: Legacy implementations of the Java platform in Fedora

2015-02-27 Thread Jiri Vanek
On 02/26/2015 02:51 PM, Jiri Vanek wrote: On 02/24/2015 10:34 AM, Jaroslav Reznik wrote: = Proposed System Wide Change: Legacy implementations of the Java platform in Fedora = https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/LegacyJDKsInFedora Change owner(s): Jiri Vanek jva...@redhat.com Currently

Re: F22 System Wide Change: Legacy implementations of the Java platform in Fedora

2015-02-27 Thread Jiri Vanek
On 02/27/2015 11:48 AM, Severin Gehwolf wrote: On Thu, 2015-02-26 at 15:46 +0100, Mikolaj Izdebski wrote: On 02/26/2015 02:46 PM, Jiri Vanek wrote: On 02/26/2015 10:13 AM, Mikolaj Izdebski wrote: On 02/26/2015 09:23 AM, Jiri Vanek wrote: On 02/26/2015 09:20 AM, Mikolaj Izdebski wrote: On 02

Re: F22 System Wide Change: Legacy implementations of the Java platform in Fedora

2015-02-27 Thread Jiri Vanek
On 02/27/2015 11:47 AM, Aleksandar Kurtakov wrote: - Original Message - From: Jiri Vanek jva...@redhat.com To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Sent: Friday, February 27, 2015 11:43:53 AM Subject: Re: F22 System Wide Change: Legacy implementations of the Java platform in Fedora On 02/26

Re: F22 System Wide Change: Legacy implementations of the Java platform in Fedora

2015-02-27 Thread Jiri Vanek
On 02/27/2015 11:58 AM, Aleksandar Kurtakov wrote: - Original Message - From: Jiri Vanek jva...@redhat.com To: Development discussions related to Fedora devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Sent: Friday, February 27, 2015 12:54:04 PM Subject: Re: F22 System Wide Change: Legacy implementations

Re: F22 System Wide Change: Legacy implementations of the Java platform in Fedora

2015-02-27 Thread Jiri Vanek
On 02/27/2015 12:04 PM, Andrew Haley wrote: On 02/27/2015 10:47 AM, Aleksandar Kurtakov wrote: If we want to be sure that this legacy jdk will not interfere with the system JDK let it not provide anything via alternatives. That way people that want it can use it by playing with PATH/JAVA_HOME

Re: F22 System Wide Change: Legacy implementations of the Java platform in Fedora

2015-02-27 Thread Jiri Vanek
On 02/27/2015 12:57 PM, Aleksandar Kurtakov wrote: Shouldn't this one replace 3). As if there are no alternatives, priorities are meaningless. Sound good. J. Alexander Kurtakov Red Hat Eclipse team - Original Message - From: Jiri Vanek jva...@redhat.com To: devel

Re: F22 System Wide Change: Legacy implementations of the Java platform in Fedora

2015-02-27 Thread Jiri Vanek
On 02/27/2015 12:04 PM, Andrew Haley wrote: On 02/27/2015 10:47 AM, Aleksandar Kurtakov wrote: If we want to be sure that this legacy jdk will not interfere with the system JDK let it not provide anything via alternatives. That way people that want it can use it by playing with PATH/JAVA_HOME

Re: F22 System Wide Change: Legacy implementations of the Java platform in Fedora

2015-02-26 Thread Jiri Vanek
On 02/26/2015 09:43 AM, Aleksandar Kurtakov wrote: - Original Message - From: Jiri Vanek jva...@redhat.com To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Sent: Thursday, February 26, 2015 10:39:35 AM Subject: Re: F22 System Wide Change: Legacy implementations of the Java platform in Fedora On 02

Re: F22 System Wide Change: Legacy implementations of the Java platform in Fedora

2015-02-26 Thread Jiri Vanek
On 02/26/2015 10:13 AM, Mikolaj Izdebski wrote: On 02/26/2015 09:23 AM, Jiri Vanek wrote: On 02/26/2015 09:20 AM, Mikolaj Izdebski wrote: On 02/26/2015 08:42 AM, Jiri Vanek wrote: Also, my proposal of introducing java metapackage (see my other post in this thread), which would always require

Re: F22 System Wide Change: Legacy implementations of the Java platform in Fedora

2015-02-26 Thread Jiri Vanek
On 02/26/2015 04:20 PM, Robert Marcano wrote: On 02/24/2015 05:04 AM, Jaroslav Reznik wrote: = Proposed System Wide Change: Legacy implementations of the Java platform in Fedora = https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/LegacyJDKsInFedora Change owner(s): Jiri Vanek jva...@redhat.com Currently

Re: F22 System Wide Change: Legacy implementations of the Java platform in Fedora

2015-02-26 Thread Jiri Vanek
On 02/24/2015 10:34 AM, Jaroslav Reznik wrote: = Proposed System Wide Change: Legacy implementations of the Java platform in Fedora = https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/LegacyJDKsInFedora Change owner(s): Jiri Vanek jva...@redhat.com Currently Fedora supports one main Java runtime and Java

Re: F22 System Wide Change: Legacy implementations of the Java platform in Fedora

2015-02-26 Thread Jiri Vanek
On 02/24/2015 08:36 PM, Sumit Bhardwaj wrote: Hi All, I have been reading this mail chain for some time and there is something I wanted to say. It's kind of a long mail, I apologize for taking so much of your time but request you to please bear with me. I work as a technical consultant on IBM

Re: F22 System Wide Change: Legacy implementations of the Java platform in Fedora

2015-02-26 Thread Jiri Vanek
On 02/24/2015 06:22 PM, Mikolaj Izdebski wrote: On 02/24/2015 05:21 PM, Mario Torre wrote: On Tue, 2015-02-24 at 15:37 +0100, Mikolaj Izdebski wrote: On 02/24/2015 02:15 PM, Jiri Vanek wrote: On 02/24/2015 12:43 PM, Mikolaj Izdebski wrote: I am against official guidelines or policy

Re: F22 System Wide Change: Legacy implementations of the Java platform in Fedora

2015-02-26 Thread Jiri Vanek
On 02/26/2015 09:16 AM, Mikolaj Izdebski wrote: On 02/25/2015 06:58 PM, Miloslav Trmač wrote: On 02/24/2015 06:41 PM, Miloslav Trmač wrote: Hello, java would be the preferred JRE in Fedora. The package would have no content, but it would have Requires on preferred Fedora JRE, currently

Re: F22 System Wide Change: Legacy implementations of the Java platform in Fedora

2015-02-26 Thread Jiri Vanek
On 02/26/2015 09:31 AM, Aleksandar Kurtakov wrote: - Original Message - From: Mikolaj Izdebski mizde...@redhat.com To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Sent: Thursday, February 26, 2015 10:16:26 AM Subject: Re: F22 System Wide Change: Legacy implementations of the Java platform in Fedora

Re: F22 System Wide Change: Legacy implementations of the Java platform in Fedora

2015-02-26 Thread Jiri Vanek
On 02/26/2015 09:20 AM, Mikolaj Izdebski wrote: On 02/26/2015 08:42 AM, Jiri Vanek wrote: Also, my proposal of introducing java metapackage (see my other post in this thread), which would always require the latest JDK, solves this problem in a different way, without modifying ordinary Java

Re: F22 System Wide Change: Legacy implementations of the Java platform in Fedora

2015-02-25 Thread Jiri Vanek
...@greysector.net [2015-02-24 09:29]: On Tuesday, 24 February 2015 at 15:09, Deepak Bhole wrote: * Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski domi...@greysector.net [2015-02-24 09:04]: On Tuesday, 24 February 2015 at 14:28, Jiri Vanek wrote: [...] There were several attempts in past like can you please support

Re: F22 System Wide Change: Legacy implementations of the Java platform in Fedora

2015-02-25 Thread Jiri Vanek
wrote: * Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski domi...@greysector.net [2015-02-24 09:29]: On Tuesday, 24 February 2015 at 15:09, Deepak Bhole wrote: * Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski domi...@greysector.net [2015-02-24 09:04]: On Tuesday, 24 February 2015 at 14:28, Jiri Vanek wrote: [...] There were

Re: F22 System Wide Change: Legacy implementations of the Java platform in Fedora

2015-02-25 Thread Jiri Vanek
On 02/24/2015 05:21 PM, Mikolaj Izdebski wrote: On 02/24/2015 04:59 PM, Pete Travis wrote: On Feb 24, 2015 8:32 AM, Mikolaj Izdebski mizde...@redhat.com wrote: On 02/24/2015 02:17 PM, Aleksandar Kurtakov wrote: I would much rather live without any legacy jdk, and if so then without any

Re: F22 System Wide Change: Legacy implementations of the Java platform in Fedora

2015-02-25 Thread Jiri Vanek
On 02/25/2015 10:07 AM, Mikolaj Izdebski wrote: On 02/25/2015 06:39 AM, Hedayat Vatankhah wrote: However, if there are JAR files which are useful for a developer, they can have a -legacy version too! There is no technical reason to suffix anything - you can put JARs that depend on old version

Re: F22 System Wide Change: Legacy implementations of the Java platform in Fedora

2015-02-25 Thread Jiri Vanek
On 02/25/2015 06:39 AM, Hedayat Vatankhah wrote: /*Kevin Kofler*/ wrote on Wed, 25 Feb 2015 01:31:59 +0100: Jaroslav Reznik wrote: = Proposed System Wide Change: Legacy implementations of the Java platform in Fedora = https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/LegacyJDKsInFedora Change owner(s):

Re: F22 System Wide Change: Legacy implementations of the Java platform in Fedora

2015-02-24 Thread Jiri Vanek
On 02/24/2015 01:34 PM, Severin Gehwolf wrote: On Tue, 2015-02-24 at 12:43 +0100, Mikolaj Izdebski wrote: [...] option one - introducing new packages - preferred 1. main jdk is proclaimed as dead as it was until now. The new jdk is derived as new package prviousName-legacy Fedora

Re: F22 System Wide Change: Legacy implementations of the Java platform in Fedora

2015-02-24 Thread Jiri Vanek
Package maintainers are responsible for their packages. If maintainer of main JDK is also maintaining legacy JDK then (s)he should be responsible for both of them. I don't see why any special rule should be defined. You missed very important point. The maintainer will never be same. We (people

Re: F22 System Wide Change: Legacy implementations of the Java platform in Fedora

2015-02-24 Thread Jiri Vanek
On 02/24/2015 01:50 PM, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote: On Tuesday, 24 February 2015 at 13:34, Severin Gehwolf wrote: On Tue, 2015-02-24 at 12:43 +0100, Mikolaj Izdebski wrote: [...] option one - introducing new packages - preferred 1. main jdk is proclaimed as dead as it was

Re: F22 System Wide Change: Legacy implementations of the Java platform in Fedora

2015-02-24 Thread Jiri Vanek
On 02/24/2015 12:43 PM, Mikolaj Izdebski wrote: I am against official guidelines or policy for legacy JDK packages. I don't think that any such policy is needed and it would only encourage adoption of old packages for which there might be no security updates. Well thats the point - people are

Re: F22 System Wide Change: Legacy implementations of the Java platform in Fedora

2015-02-24 Thread Jiri Vanek
On 02/24/2015 04:03 PM, Mikolaj Izdebski wrote: On 02/24/2015 03:51 PM, Mikolaj Izdebski wrote: 2.) Ensure dist upgrades remove old JDK package (which may no longer get security updates). Firstly, as I understand upgrade isn't supposed to remove packages by default, unless they are

Re: F22 System Wide Change: Legacy implementations of the Java platform in Fedora

2015-02-24 Thread Jiri Vanek
On 02/24/2015 02:58 PM, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote: On Tuesday, 24 February 2015 at 14:28, Jiri Vanek wrote: [...] There were several attempts in past like can you please support jdk 7,6...in newer fedoras and we always told no. When come speech about do it on your own suddenly many

Re: F22 System Wide Change: Legacy implementations of the Java platform in Fedora

2015-02-24 Thread Jiri Vanek
On 02/24/2015 02:17 PM, Aleksandar Kurtakov wrote: - Original Message - From: Jiri Vanek jva...@redhat.com To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Sent: Tuesday, February 24, 2015 3:02:38 PM Subject: Re: F22 System Wide Change: Legacy implementations of the Java platform in Fedora On 02/24

Re: F22 System Wide Change: Legacy implementations of the Java platform in Fedora

2015-02-24 Thread Jiri Vanek
On 02/24/2015 03:11 PM, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote: On Tuesday, 24 February 2015 at 15:09, Deepak Bhole wrote: * Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski domi...@greysector.net [2015-02-24 09:04]: On Tuesday, 24 February 2015 at 14:28, Jiri Vanek wrote: [...] There were several attempts

Orphaning visualvm

2015-02-05 Thread Jiri Vanek
Hi! I'm no longer interested in maintaining of visualvm - https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/visualvm/ - Simply I didn't used it for last three years If somebody still is using it, I will happily retire ownership to him/her. Looking forward to meet the successor, J. --

Bump of giflib broken OpenJDK (and many other packages I guess)

2013-11-25 Thread Jiri Vanek
Hi! Although it is more then nice to have giflib 5 in rawhide, I would encourage you to untag[1] it from rawhide, and prepare doubled packages in koji to give dependent packages time to rebuilt: 1) Find a provenpackager / releng member to work on rebuilding all the packages quickly