Uh no? There's nothing headed to any Fedora release that will replace or
touch redis in any way. The "obsoletes" is commented out in the spec and
non-functional, it's only there for note/intent purposes depending on what
comes of this change proposal.
If I mistakenly pushed something somewhere
On Wed, Apr 17, 2024 at 9:43 AM Leon Fauster via devel <
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org> wrote:
> Am 17.04.24 um 15:59 schrieb Jonathan Wright via devel:
> > Valley 7.2.5 stable was released yesterday. Builds are in Bodhi and
> > ready for testing/feedback.
> >
> >
ey is then the one the AWS employee did.
>>
>> Thank you Jonathan for the work on this.
>>
>> On 3/28/24 11:13, Jonathan Wright via devel wrote:
>> > This is the one previously known as "PlaceHolderKV".
>> >
>> > I forgot to mention but red
com> wrote:
> So, valkey is then the one the AWS employee did.
>
> Thank you Jonathan for the work on this.
>
> On 3/28/24 11:13, Jonathan Wright via devel wrote:
> > This is the one previously known as "PlaceHolderKV".
> >
> > I forgot to men
-1 as well, for all the reasons already mentioned.
On Mon, Apr 8, 2024 at 8:28 AM Iñaki Ucar wrote:
> So someone wanted to use rpmautospec and was willing to do the work,
> putting things together as an opt-in feature. Perfect.
>
> Now, I don't see any problem if some time later someone
That would be a bit premature. At this point it looks like one bad actor,
and the other maintainer probably wasn't even aware. We should wait and
see how this plays out.
On Fri, Mar 29, 2024 at 1:01 PM Kevin Kofler via devel <
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> wow:
dation.
>
>
> https://www.linuxfoundation.org/press/linux-foundation-launches-open-source-valkey-community
>
> It came out just today.
>
> On 3/23/24 11:35, Jonathan Wright via devel wrote:
> > KeyDB builds are in Bodhi and ready for testing for all Fedora versions
> > + EPEL
KeyDB builds are in Bodhi and ready for testing for all Fedora versions +
EPEL8/9.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/?search=keydb-6.3.4-2
I'm still keeping an eye on, and chatting with the creators of the other
two, redict and the unnamed one from an AWS employee and will package them
On Thu, Mar 21, 2024 at 1:28 PM Neal Gompa wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 21, 2024 at 2:24 PM Scott Williams
> wrote:
> >
> > > If we have some clue that a v7 merge/release
> > > is on the very near horizon for KeyDB
> >
> > This doesn't look promising for v7 in time for Fedora 40 or shortly
> after,
Anything that was new in Redis 7 is not currently in KeyDB. This is a
decent list of features I found that would be impacted.
https://www.instaclustr.com/blog/redis-7-new-features/
KeyDB has it on their roadmap to merge in the latest features from Redis 7
but that's not complete yet (nor can I
While it may not end up as the right solution to replace Redis, here's the
review for KeyDB:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2270592
On Wed, Mar 20, 2024 at 9:49 PM Kevin Kofler via devel <
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org> wrote:
> Kevin Kofler via devel wrote:
> > Can
Is this all a misunderstanding?
https://redis.com/blog/redis-labs-modules-license-changes/ seems to claim
that redis-core which appears to cover redis-server and redis-sentinel will
remain BSD-3.
On Wed, Mar 20, 2024 at 7:38 PM Jonathan Wright
wrote:
> DragonflyDB is not an option, they do not
DragonflyDB is not an option, they do not use an OSI-approved license. I
reached out to them a couple of years ago to see if they would swap to one
and they said they don't have an interest in it.
On Wed, Mar 20, 2024 at 7:13 PM Aaron Rainbolt wrote:
> On 3/20/24 17:19, Neal Gompa wrote:
>
>
, 2024 at 5:29 PM Neal Gompa wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 20, 2024 at 6:26 PM Jonathan Wright via devel
> wrote:
> >
> > We can potentially look to https://github.com/Snapchat/KeyDB which I've
> been loosely working on packaging anyway.
> >
>
> I'll want to test this for P
We can potentially look to https://github.com/Snapchat/KeyDB which I've
been loosely working on packaging anyway.
On Wed, Mar 20, 2024 at 5:21 PM Neal Gompa wrote:
> Hey everyone,
>
> It looks like Redis, Inc. has announced that future versions of Redis
> are no longer OSS and will be
Hello,
I'm updating certbot from 2.6.0 to 2.9.0 in EPEL9 [1]. This contains one
minor, potentially breaking changes though I don't expect it to impact
anyone:
NamespaceConfig now tracks how its arguments were set via a dictionary,
allowing us to remove a bunch
of global state previously needed
I think you sent this to the wrong list ;)
On Wed, Feb 7, 2024 at 8:03 AM Luis Correia
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> please excuse my probable clumsiness but I'm having issues while trying to
> get ssh access to a package I'm now co-maintaining on RPM Fusion Free.
>
> I have followed all steps in
>
mock -r fedora-rawhide-x86_64 --scrub=bootstrap did the trick. Thank you!
On Fri, Dec 1, 2023 at 9:27 AM Pavel Raiskup wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 1, 2023 at 4:09 PM Jonathan Wright via devel <
> devel@lists.fedoraproject.org> wrote:
>
>> Erm, I do already have dnf5 present
Erm, I do already have dnf5 present within my f39 install where I was
trying to run the mockbuild.
$ which /usr/bin/dnf5
/usr/bin/dnf5
Any ideas as to the cause of the error?
On Fri, Dec 1, 2023 at 9:06 AM Jonathan Wright
wrote:
> This is awesome!
>
> I grabbed the RPM and then attempted to
This is awesome!
I grabbed the RPM and then attempted to run a `fedpkg --release rawhide
mockbuild` using it and ran into this error:
INFO: Package manager dnf5 detected and used (direct choice)
Start: dnf5 update
execv(/usr/bin/dnf5) failed: No such file or directory
Shouldn't it call dnf5 as
Co-maintainers welcome! What's your FAS? :D
On Mon, Nov 20, 2023 at 9:39 AM Pete Zaitcev wrote:
> On Mon, 20 Nov 2023 10:48:58 +0100
> Miro Hrončok wrote:
>
> > Request package ownership via the *Take* button in he left column on
> > https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/
>
> >
Shoot those were mine. I didn't mean to let them orphan :(
On Wed, Oct 4, 2023 at 6:39 PM Aleksei Bavshin
wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 25, 2023 at 5:00 AM Miro Hrončok wrote:
> > RBTools orphan 2
> weeks ago
> > python-pydiffx
I've picked up git and paperkey.
On Tue, Oct 3, 2023 at 9:25 AM Todd Zullinger wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm orphaning all my packages (which I effectively did
> months ago). It's been fun being a maintainer since 2006.
>
> However, I am not interested in contributing to a project
> where the primary
That would make for somedifficult verbal conversations. What do you
propose for the phonetic version? :D
On Mon, Jul 24, 2023 at 3:43 PM Chuck Anderson wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 24, 2023 at 02:08:25PM -0400, Stephen Smoogen wrote:
> > Personally I would have preferred to call this a new tool
I picked up the package back in December of '22 when it was orphaned. Ref
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/thread/W5YHD4JSFGJQBZEUWS5KYFJHJSIWPZCD/
I'm happy to re-add you so I've added you back as an admin :)
On Mon, Jul 24, 2023 at 8:31 AM Ivan
Lance,
I can sponsor/mentor you. I'll reach out to ya via Mattermost.
On Tue, Jun 27, 2023 at 10:51 AM Lance Albertson wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, Jun 22, 2023 at 9:50 AM Othman Madjoudj
> wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> Please note that I've orphaned by packages, list in the end of the
>> message.
>>
>>
If you'll add me as admin/owner on the packages I'll continue to maintain
them. FAS jonathanspw
Especially interested in remmina since I use it nearly every day.
On Wed, Jun 21, 2023 at 12:27 PM Philip Wyett
wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> After the announcement below today.
>
>
If you can do a review on
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2186056 it will help
unblock the updates.
On Tue, Apr 4, 2023 at 8:46 PM Mukundan Ragavan
wrote:
>
> On 4/3/23 12:53, Blaise Pabon wrote:
>
> Hi Mukundan, Jonathan,
>
> I have been working on becoming a fedora
I built it for EPEL9 BTW :)
On Mon, Apr 3, 2023 at 8:49 AM Kamil Paral wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 30, 2023 at 5:12 PM Jonathan Wright via devel <
> devel@lists.fedoraproject.org> wrote:
>
>> I've grabbed this package. I'll keep an eye on the GH issue and get an
>> up
Personally I'd not really like this solution. For some sponsors which have
tons of time and can always take on people to mentor it will be great for
those folks. For people who get "assigned" to sponsors that don't
necessarily have time and don't update their status to unavailable or
whatever at
You added me on it a while back and I haven't done anything with it yet,
but I do still intend to work on it when I get a chance.
On Sun, Apr 2, 2023 at 9:52 AM Mukundan Ragavan
wrote:
>
> I have been maintaining spyder in Fedora for sometime now. Since the
> time I took up maintaining spyder,
I just retired python-acme this morning in F38/39. It's now built by the
certbot package.
On Thu, Mar 30, 2023 at 11:02 AM Jerry James wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 1, 2023 at 3:28 PM Jerry James wrote:
> > The maintainers of the packages I am about to mention are BCCed on this
> email.
>
> And that
I've grabbed this package. I'll keep an eye on the GH issue and get an
update released once upstream releases patches/updates for the kernel
issues.
On Thu, Mar 30, 2023 at 5:59 AM Leigh Scott wrote:
> I have orphaned hstr today.
>
>
> https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/hstr
>
> It is
2.2.0 will hit F37 and F38 stable repos tonight.
I'm holding EPEL9 back a little bit longer.
On Tue, Mar 21, 2023 at 9:21 AM Alexander Bokovoy
wrote:
> On ti, 21 maalis 2023, Jonathan Wright via devel wrote:
> >Hi,
> >
> >I've updated Certbot to 2.2.0 in rawhide, f38, f37,
Hi,
I've updated Certbot to 2.2.0 in rawhide, f38, f37, and epel9. I wanted to
email devel and seek more testing than usual for this release as I've also
converted the 10-15 packages to be built from a single spec instead of all
broken up as they were prior (ref
I'm seeing the same errors on rawhide buildroot right now.
On Mon, Jan 23, 2023 at 1:34 PM Artur Frenszek-Iwicki <
s...@fedoraproject.org> wrote:
> I wanted to resubmit one of my failed builds, but the buildroot seems to
> be broken currently:
>
> > Problem 1: package
On Tue, Jan 17, 2023 at 8:21 AM Stephen Smoogen wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, 17 Jan 2023 at 09:19, Arthur Bols wrote:
>
>> On 17/01/2023 14:57, Stephen Smoogen wrote:
>> > So bodhi and pagure are at different datacenters with hopefully
>> different
>> > network paths. Could people do some mtr or
Are you by chance running this inside of a rawhide docker container within
GH actions? If so, I'm in the same boat and haven't figured out how to
force it back to "2", or why it's failing in the first place.
On Mon, Jan 16, 2023 at 12:05 PM Daniel P. Berrangé
wrote:
> I'm getting the strange
Just got the following error:
https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/50417
I'm pretty sure I've always requested branches as someone with "commit"
access and never had them rejected.
On Thu, Jan 12, 2023 at 3:30 AM Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski <
domi...@greysector.net> wrote:
> On
This is incredible, thank you all so much for the work!
On Tue, Jan 10, 2023, 5:26 AM Michal Konecny wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> this automation is now in place and new SCM requests will be processed
> automatically. If you find any issue with the automation, please report it
> to toddlers issue
I have a spec mostly ready to combine all of it back into a single spec
file. Would you be open to discussing/reviewing that, merging it, then
pushing that to stable?
On Tue, Dec 27, 2022 at 9:17 PM Nick Bebout wrote:
> I have built certbot 2.1.0 for all supported releases of Fedora and for
>
I've taken chocolate-doom and gif2png.
On Tue, Nov 29, 2022 at 7:53 AM Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> Hi
>
> I have orphaned all the packages I used to maintain but haven't had the
> time to keep up with in a long time. Feel free to pick them up if you
> like. All the best.
>
>
I took a few packages. I'm trying to also take bonnie++ but the take
request is returning a 500 error.
On Mon, Nov 28, 2022 at 12:35 PM Mattia Verga via devel <
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org> wrote:
> Il 28/11/22 19:20, Mattia Verga ha scritto:
> > From your output I made a list of the orphaned
Constantly changing the name/command of the package manager seems like a
huge annoyance to end users at best, and a point of discouragement at worst.
Think about all the guides that can be found via search engines for how to
do things in a given OS. If we're constantly changing the package
I have some packages that rely on this so I'm happy to jump on as a
co-maintainer. Giving someone else a chance to take lead but if no one
else does I'll pick it up.
On Mon, Oct 10, 2022 at 1:57 PM drago01 wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 10, 2022 at 11:11 AM Richard W.M. Jones
> wrote:
> >
> > On Mon,
Absolutely. The more help the merrier.
On Thu, Sep 29, 2022 at 3:01 AM Sandro wrote:
> On 29-09-2022 03:44, Orion Poplawski wrote:
> > Looks like python-pandas has been orphaned. Is anyone interested in
> > taking it on? I've done some drive by work (and have maintained it in
> > EPEL), but
I threw my name on it. Will go through its current state in the next few
days.
On Wed, Sep 28, 2022 at 8:45 PM Orion Poplawski wrote:
> Looks like python-pandas has been orphaned. Is anyone interested in
> taking it on? I've done some drive by work (and have maintained it in
> EPEL), but I
On Tue, Sep 6, 2022 at 3:52 PM Vitaly Zaitsev via devel <
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org> wrote:
> On 06/09/2022 19:49, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
> > Of course, hardware authenticators would be even more secure, and it
> > sure seems pretty reasonable to expect that people with commit access to
> >
I'm happy to help maintain the python packages.
FAS: jonathanspw
On Mon, Sep 5, 2022 at 11:00 AM Ankur Sinha wrote:
> I've taken a few more (a few for the neuro-sig):
>
> > Depending on: mcpanel (1), status change: 2022-08-30 (0 weeks ago)
> > eegview (maintained by: aekoroglu,
Ah I see you got someone.
On Tue, Aug 30, 2022 at 3:19 PM Jonathan Wright
wrote:
> I'll trade you for a basic Python package:
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2121258
>
> On Tue, Aug 30, 2022 at 6:56 AM Richard W.M. Jones
> wrote:
>
>>
>>
I'll trade you for a basic Python package:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2121258
On Tue, Aug 30, 2022 at 6:56 AM Richard W.M. Jones
wrote:
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2122605
>
> Pretty simple package, just a small library and a single tool.
>
> This
I'll start on yours if you'll start on mine, I have a pile of my own :)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/buglist.cgi?bug_status=NEW=Package%20Review=jonathan%40almalinux.org=1=equals_name=My%20review%20requests_id=12864886=Fedora_based_on=My%20review%20requests_format=advanced
On Thu, Aug 25, 2022 at
I'm working on some of the deps for mailman3/hyperkitty.
I should have the python-flufl-lock dep solved for you.
On Mon, Aug 22, 2022 at 12:04 PM Michel Alexandre Salim <
sali...@fedoraproject.org> wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 22, 2022 at 01:07:26PM +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> > The following packages
Welcome to Fedora :)
On Mon, Aug 22, 2022 at 5:53 PM Aaron Stern via devel <
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org> wrote:
> Greetings all.
>
> My name is Aaron, I contribute packages for openSUSE (
> https://build.opensuse.org/users/ukbeast89) and am looking to help bring
> updates to wine and FAudio.
I'm happy to trade for https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2118887
On Sun, Aug 21, 2022 at 1:03 PM Lyes Saadi
wrote:
> Hello devel!
>
> I have new dependency I need to update dialect to 2.0. It's been waiting
> since july, so I'm proposing a review swap. It's the python/meson
>
Do it!
On Thu, Aug 18, 2022, 4:01 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> Greetings everyone.
>
> Many years ago mock introduced and then made default it's isolation to
> use systemd-nspawn instead of chroot. Shortly after the nspawn isolation
> was added, it was used in fedoraproject koji builds, but there
He's using this:
fedora-review-0.8.0-1.fc36.noarch : Review tool for fedora rpm packages
Repo: updates
Matched from:
Filename: /usr/bin/fedora-create-review
I get the same error.
On Mon, Aug 8, 2022 at 4:15 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 07, 2022 at 08:27:19PM -0500, Richard
Per the unresponsive package maintainer policy I'm checking if anyone has a
way to contact Haïkel Guémar (FAS hguemar).
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2116206
Lack of updates to one of his packages, python-pyperclip is holding up
other packages.
I've taken ownership of RBTools, csound, and gpart.
On Tue, Aug 2, 2022 at 4:50 AM Miro Hrončok wrote:
> The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they
> are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for
> sure
> that the package should be retired,
Hi,
I'd like to take over the orphaned package dnstracer.
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/dnstracer
I submitted a ticket with releng for this as there was no "take" button present.
https://pagure.io/releng/issue/10915
My username is jonathanspw
60 matches
Mail list logo
