Some days ago the version number for the f18-kernels was changed to
20x as in kernel-3.7.3-205.fc18. Is there a special reason for this?
Are the first 200 numbers reserved for something?
--joshua
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
2012/10/28 Matthew Garrett mj...@srcf.ucam.org
On Sun, Oct 28, 2012 at 03:04:15AM +0100, Joshua C. wrote:
I see but is there a general switch do disable those even if secure boot
is
set to enable in the uefi firmware?
No. That's kind of the point.
Honestly looking into the latest
Over the last months there have been many patches to the rawhide-kernel and
rawhide-grub2 packages that aim to make those compatible with the M$
requirements for secure boot. Those locked down many user space
capabilities. However I still haven't seen any single magic switch that
can disable all
2012/10/28 Kevin Kofler kevin.kof...@chello.at
Joshua C. wrote:
Over the last months there have been many patches to the rawhide-kernel
and rawhide-grub2 packages that aim to make those compatible with the M$
requirements for secure boot. Those locked down many user space
capabilities
2012/10/15 Hans de Goede hdego...@redhat.com:
Hi,
On 10/15/2012 10:41 AM, Joshua C. wrote:
2012/10/15 Hans de Goede hdego...@redhat.com:
Hi,
On 10/15/2012 09:23 AM, Joshua C. wrote:
I have a broken fake raid on my machine (intel p67 chipset with one of
the disks missing) and when
I have a broken fake raid on my machine (intel p67 chipset with one of
the disks missing) and when trying to install F17 yesterday (with
up-to-date respin done with pungi) I was greeted with the following
message disk sdXXX has bios raid information and. blah. is
part of a broken raid,
2012/10/15 Hans de Goede hdego...@redhat.com:
Hi,
On 10/15/2012 09:23 AM, Joshua C. wrote:
I have a broken fake raid on my machine (intel p67 chipset with one of
the disks missing) and when trying to install F17 yesterday (with
up-to-date respin done with pungi) I was greeted
Can someone finally rebuild firefox 6.0.1 for fedora? The browser is a
critical part of everyone's system today and I really don't understand
why such software isn't updated when needed to.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
2011/9/2 Michał Piotrowski mkkp...@gmail.com:
Hi,
2011/9/1 Joshua C. joshua...@googlemail.com:
Can someone finally rebuild firefox 6.0.1 for fedora? The browser is a
critical part of everyone's system today and I really don't understand
why such software isn't updated when needed to.
I'm
The nightly builds for f16 are broken for the last 4-5 days because of
the abrt and libreport packages and the error is:
DEBUG util.py:247: Package abrt-plugin-bugzilla is obsoleted by
libreport-plugin-bugzilla, but obsoleting package does not provide for
requirements
DEBUG util.py:247: Package
2011/7/21 Jiri Moskovcak jmosk...@redhat.com:
On 07/21/2011 07:32 PM, Joshua C. wrote:
The nightly builds for f16 are broken for the last 4-5 days because of
the abrt and libreport packages and the error is:
DEBUG util.py:247: Package abrt-plugin-bugzilla is obsoleted by
libreport-plugin
I've been testing with grub and found an interesting problem. When I
install the package
http://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/packages/grub/0.97/71.fc15/x86_64/grub-0.97-71.fc15.x86_64.rpm
everything is fine and grub works as it should:
[root@localhost x86_64-redhat]# grub
Probing devices to guess
Can someone please apply this patch
http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/mickflemm/01-fast-chan-switch-modparm
to the f15 kernel? It fixes an introduced regression with the 2.6.38
kernel https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=34992. Thanks
--joshua
--
devel mailing list
2011/3/24 Pete Zaitcev zait...@redhat.com:
On Wed, 23 Mar 2011 20:36:33 -0400
Genes MailLists li...@sapience.com wrote:
On 03/23/2011 07:58 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
Jochen Schmitt wrote:
If you want to get firefox4 on Fedora 14 now, the only way is to use
the private firefox4 repository
2011/3/24 Kevin Kofler kevin.kof...@chello.at:
drago01 wrote:
On Thu, Mar 24, 2011 at 7:23 PM, Kevin Kofler kevin.kof...@chello.at
wrote:
Adam Williamson wrote:
In the particular case of Firefox, this isn't a problem, as it just
gives you one giant static executable...so it's very easy to
Hi,
fedora is known for offering the latest and greates software and
being on the edge etc. So I was just wondering if the latest f14
will ever get the latest firefox 4.0?
Recompilation of the packages from f15 is not such a good option.
--jason
--
devel mailing list
2011/3/23 Nathaniel McCallum nathan...@natemccallum.com:
On Wed, 2011-03-23 at 16:41 -0500, Adam Miller wrote:
On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 10:35:55PM +0100, Joshua C. wrote:
Hi,
fedora is known for offering the latest and greates software and
being on the edge etc. So I was just wondering
2011/3/23 Jochen Schmitt joc...@herr-schmitt.de:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Am 23.03.2011 22:35, schrieb Joshua C.:
fedora is known for offering the latest and greates software and
being on the edge etc. So I was just wondering if the latest f14
will ever get the latest
Is there any chance that we'll get the kernel-2.6.36.x on f14?
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
19 matches
Mail list logo
