[EPEL-devel] Re: Retire mongodb from EPEL7

2020-09-22 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Tue, Sep 22, 2020 at 06:33:49AM -0700, Troy Dawson wrote: > On Tue, Sep 22, 2020 at 5:28 AM Andrew C Aitchison > wrote: > > > > On Tue, 22 Sep 2020, Patrik Novotny wrote: > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > there's intend to retire the mongodb package from EPEL7 [1]. As for > > > the MongoDB license

Re: Fedora 33 - ssh clients - drop of PubkeyAcceptedKeyTypes=ssh-rsa

2020-09-20 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Sun, Sep 20, 2020 at 07:11:29PM +0200, Pavel Raiskup wrote: > After upgrade of one of my servers to F33, I noticed that I can not ssh to > one of my other servers running Debian 9 system (relatively freshly EOLed, > I need to do something about it). On F33 I always need to: > > $ ssh

Re: Fedora EOL wrt new dist-git branches (and my confusion)

2020-09-20 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Sat, Sep 19, 2020 at 03:11:39PM -0500, Richard Shaw wrote: > On Fri, Sep 18, 2020 at 5:03 PM Ben Cotton wrote: > > > On Fri, Sep 18, 2020, 17:03 Miro Hrončok wrote: > > > >> > >> So, my question is: Should we fix the document to describe the long > >> standing > >> practice more

Re: Fedora EOL wrt new dist-git branches (and my confusion)

2020-09-20 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Fri, Sep 18, 2020 at 11:02:26PM +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote: > Hello, > > As many of you know, Fedora has an EOL policy that roughly tl;drs to: > > "Fedora N goes to End of Life 4 weeks after Fedora N+2 Final Release (GA)." > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_Release_Life_Cycle > > The

[EPEL-devel] Re: Proposed EPEL Playground Documentation

2020-09-20 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Wed, Sep 16, 2020 at 11:28:10AM -0700, Troy Dawson wrote: > On Wed, Sep 16, 2020 at 9:36 AM Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > > > On Tue, Sep 15, 2020 at 09:18:17AM -0700, Troy Dawson wrote: > > ...snip... > > > > > > When a maintainer is done with their package i

[EPEL-devel] Re: proposal: EPEL 8 Next

2020-09-20 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Wed, Sep 16, 2020 at 09:54:00PM -0500, Carl George wrote: > At the EPEL Steering Committee last week, we had an extensive discussion of > this proposal, specifically focused on how to handle the dist macro. I > believe these are the possible choices. > > * keep dist the same as epel8 (.el8) >

Re: btrfs and default page sizes (4k vs 64k)

2020-09-18 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Fri, Sep 18, 2020 at 10:08:46AM -0400, Neal Gompa wrote: > On Fri, Sep 18, 2020 at 10:07 AM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek > wrote: > > > > On Wed, Sep 16, 2020 at 02:09:42PM -0400, Neal Gompa wrote: > > > I'm annoyed in general that we still have problems like this, and I'm > > > even more

Re: Unresponsive packagers: ekulik, imcleod and lsun

2020-09-17 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Thu, Sep 17, 2020 at 05:08:08PM +0100, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote: > On Wed, Sep 16, 2020 at 05:26:48PM +0200, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: > > Good Morning Everyone, > > > > Since September 5th, we have been emailing daily the following users to > > notify > > that the email they have set in FAS

Re: jbig2dec 0.19

2020-09-17 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Thu, Sep 17, 2020 at 02:19:33PM -, Michael J Gruber wrote: > ... this or build root overrides, but what about rawhide? rawhide can use side tags as well... is that the question? sidetags are in general much better than buildroot overrides (IMHO). kevin signature.asc Description: PGP

Re: Shouldn't we have process for removing old packages?

2020-09-17 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Thu, Sep 17, 2020 at 12:39:28PM +0200, Vít Ondruch wrote: > Looking at rubygem-sinatra-rabbit [1], I wonder if we should not have > process for removing "zombie" packages. > > The issue with this package is that while it keeps building, it is very > likely not working. The `%check` suite is

[EPEL-devel] Re: Proposed EPEL Playground Documentation

2020-09-16 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Tue, Sep 15, 2020 at 09:18:17AM -0700, Troy Dawson wrote: ...snip... > > When a maintainer is done with their package in playground, they must > untag all builds of it out of epel-playground. We do not want > epel-playground cluttered with old test packages. Done means either > the package

[EPEL-devel] Re: EPEL playground && mock builds against released repos

2020-09-15 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Tue, Sep 15, 2020 at 10:53:10AM +0200, Pavel Raiskup wrote: > Hi, we ship epelplayground-8-x86_64.cfg file in mock-core-configs so users can > reproduce builds locally with mock. Initially the configuration worked, but > it > has been failing for quite some time now. Dnf isn't able to

[EPEL-devel] Re: Proposing an EPEL packaging SIG

2020-09-15 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Mon, Sep 14, 2020 at 09:42:36AM -0700, Michel Alexandre Salim wrote: > I wonder if these are two separate concerns though? I agree that being > able to indicate a package should always be branched would be great, > but... epel-sig / epel-wranglers might not find a package relevant in a > new

Re: [EPEL-devel] Re: Proposing an EPEL packaging SIG

2020-09-15 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Mon, Sep 14, 2020 at 09:42:36AM -0700, Michel Alexandre Salim wrote: > I wonder if these are two separate concerns though? I agree that being > able to indicate a package should always be branched would be great, > but... epel-sig / epel-wranglers might not find a package relevant in a > new

Re: When will we have access to https://openqa.stg.fedoraproject.org ?

2020-09-14 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Mon, Sep 14, 2020 at 09:22:28AM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Mon, 2020-09-14 at 08:56 -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > On Mon, Sep 14, 2020 at 10:31:50AM +0200, Normand wrote: > > > Hello Adam, > > > > > > Since the infra move we do no

Re: When will we have access to https://openqa.stg.fedoraproject.org ?

2020-09-14 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Mon, Sep 14, 2020 at 10:31:50AM +0200, Normand wrote: > Hello Adam, > > Since the infra move we do not have anymore access to > https://openqa.stg.fedoraproject.org > Do you know when it is planned to have access to it ? > > So unable to have access to openqa tests results for aarch64 and

Re: [EPEL-devel] Proposing an EPEL packaging SIG

2020-09-14 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Fri, Sep 11, 2020 at 11:52:03AM -0700, Michel Alexandre Salim wrote: ...snip... > > EPEL packages are maintained in dist-git as additional branches on > Fedora packages; however, unlike with Fedora releases, where by default > a package gets branched for any new Fedora release, EPEL branches

[EPEL-devel] Re: Proposing an EPEL packaging SIG

2020-09-14 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Fri, Sep 11, 2020 at 11:52:03AM -0700, Michel Alexandre Salim wrote: ...snip... > > EPEL packages are maintained in dist-git as additional branches on > Fedora packages; however, unlike with Fedora releases, where by default > a package gets branched for any new Fedora release, EPEL branches

Re: F33 update stuck for past 6 days in request for testing->stable

2020-09-11 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Fri, Sep 11, 2020 at 04:35:03PM -0500, Tony Asleson wrote: > This release: > > https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-4da598e74b > > has been stuck waiting to get moved to stable. Is some error going on > that isn't evident? We are in Beta freeze. Only packages that fix

[EPEL-devel] Re: Proposed EPEL Playground Documentation

2020-09-09 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Tue, Sep 08, 2020 at 08:52:39AM -0700, Troy Dawson wrote: > Note1: Not everything has been implemented yet. package.cfg is still > in the epel repos. fedpkg has not been updated. This documentation > will go out when those changes are implemented. > > Note2: This is a proposal. It can be

Re: [ELN] Update obsoleted for weird reasons

2020-09-09 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Wed, Sep 09, 2020 at 08:07:24PM +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote: > Hello. > > I've noticed at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python3.9 that the latest > ELN release of python3.9 is behind Fedora. > > I've assumed the build has failed, but it succeeded: > >

[EPEL-devel] Re: proposal: EPEL 8 Next

2020-09-09 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Wed, Sep 09, 2020 at 01:15:29PM -0500, Carl George wrote: > > So, maintainers would need to be careful to make sure epel8-next or > > whatever packages are rpm 'newer' at all times to make this work right? > > Or I guess if they were fixing soname issues like above, dnf might be > > smart

[EPEL-devel] Re: proposal: EPEL 8 Next

2020-09-09 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Wed, Sep 09, 2020 at 12:36:44PM -0400, Ben Cotton wrote: ...snip... > Warning: heresy and rampant speculation ahead! > It's too early to do this now, but I think there's a compelling case > to be made for shifting EPEL from Fedora to Stream at some point. This > would be dependent on getting a

[EPEL-devel] Re: proposal: EPEL 8 Next

2020-09-09 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Tue, Sep 08, 2020 at 11:00:42PM -0500, Carl George wrote: > Howdy folks, > > A large part of my day job is working on CentOS Stream. Naturally I would > like it to be successful and have wide adoption. I know that EPEL will play > a big role in this success. EPEL is extremely popular. Many

Re: fedbot spamming in #fedora

2020-09-06 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Sat, Sep 05, 2020 at 12:54:34AM +0200, Germano Massullo wrote: > Il 19/07/20 19:41, Kevin Fenzi ha scritto: > > On Fri, Jul 17, 2020 at 05:34:13PM +0200, Germano Massullo wrote: > >> Is it necessary to have in #fedora IRC channel, fedbot spamming 48 times > >> p

[EPEL-devel] Re: Continuing playground discussion

2020-09-06 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Fri, Sep 04, 2020 at 07:18:31AM -0700, Troy Dawson wrote: ...snipp > Step 5 - Send a daily report > -- Is this similar to what we send for EPEL6,7,8 ? > --- If this is true, I'm in favor of it. If not, then please explain more. > -- I have no idea about the work involved for this. I was

Re: F34 Change: Reduce installation media size by improving the compression ratio of SquashFS filesystem (Self-Contained Change)

2020-09-03 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Thu, Sep 03, 2020 at 11:30:10AM +0200, Kamil Paral wrote: > On Wed, Sep 2, 2020 at 8:28 PM Matthew Miller > wrote: > > > On Tue, Sep 01, 2020 at 02:13:21PM +0200, Kamil Paral wrote: > > > Bohdan, could you build the same image in several configurations (the > > most > > > likely candidates)

Re: Fedora Jam 33 Beta - Possible Blocker?

2020-09-02 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Wed, Sep 02, 2020 at 12:08:58PM -0700, Erich Eickmeyer wrote: > HI all, > > On Wed, Sep 2, 2020 at 2:36 pm, Matthew Miller > wrote: > > On Wed, Sep 02, 2020 at 02:25:25PM -0400, Neal Gompa wrote: > > > There's a FBR (freeze break request) to patch all the builders to > > > fix > > > this

[EPEL-devel] Re: Continuing playground discussion

2020-09-02 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Mon, Aug 31, 2020 at 08:05:14AM -0700, Troy Dawson wrote: > On Mon, Aug 31, 2020 at 7:08 AM Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > > > > > > > > On Mon, 31 Aug 2020 at 09:43, Troy Dawson wrote: > >> > >> On Sun, Aug 30, 2020 at 11:44 AM kevin wrote: > >> > > >> > >> > > Thoughts? > >> > > >> > Well,

Re: Strange build failures in rawhide buildroot (cont'd) - glibc 2.33 dev snapshot?

2020-08-15 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Sat, Aug 15, 2020 at 05:46:43PM +0200, Fabio Valentini wrote: > On Sat, Aug 15, 2020 at 5:30 PM Paul Howarth wrote: > > It does! Running mock with --isolation=simple works around the issue. > Looks like the glibc 2.32.9000 snapshot broke systemd-nspawn based > chroots with this change: > -

Re: Strange build failures in rawhide buildroot (cont'd) - glibc 2.33 dev snapshot?

2020-08-14 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Fri, Aug 14, 2020 at 09:14:46PM +0200, Fabio Valentini wrote: > > Sérgio, I have no idea what you're talking about here. Do you mean the > new policy to wait with a rawhide compose until the first "branched" > compose is successful and synced out? If I understand correctly, that > "policy" is

Re: nothing provides kernel needed by libguestfs-1:1.43.1-4.fc33.x86_64

2020-08-13 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Wed, Aug 12, 2020 at 02:43:15PM +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote: > On 12. 08. 20 14:39, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > There is indeed no kernel package I can find that's tagged into > > f34, but there is one tagged into f33: > > > >https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=1579426 >

Re: Please untag dotnet3.1-3.1.106-1.fc33

2020-08-13 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Thu, Aug 13, 2020 at 09:23:35AM -0600, Jeff Law wrote: > On Thu, 2020-08-13 at 11:13 -0400, Omair Majid wrote: > > Jeff Law writes: > > > > > I can't help with the untagging, but I'm here if there's anything > > > going wrong with the system tools that is ultimately affecting dotnet. > > > >

Re: User builds can't be viewed in bodhi

2020-08-12 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Thu, Aug 13, 2020 at 01:16:59AM +0100, Chihurumnaya Ibiam wrote: > Hi, > > While trying to access a user's builds in bodhi I kept getting this error > . Can you try again now? There was/is just finishing up a planned outage:

Re: Fedora 33 Mass Branching

2020-08-11 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Tue, Aug 11, 2020 at 09:56:10AM -0700, Tom Stellard wrote: > On 8/11/20 12:44 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > On Mon, Aug 10, 2020 at 05:39:02PM -0700, Tom Stellard wrote: > > > On 8/9/20 3:16 PM, Mohan Boddu wrote: > > > > Hello All, > > > > >

Re: Fedora 33 Mass Branching

2020-08-11 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Mon, Aug 10, 2020 at 05:39:02PM -0700, Tom Stellard wrote: > On 8/9/20 3:16 PM, Mohan Boddu wrote: > > Hello All, > > > > Fedora 33 will be branched from rawhide on August 11th 2020 as per the > > Fedora 33 schedule[1]. The process takes about a day and everything > > should be ready by August

Re: LTO and the F33 mass rebuild

2020-08-11 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Sun, Aug 09, 2020 at 10:06:49PM -0600, Jeff Law wrote: > On Sun, 2020-08-09 at 12:02 +0200, Fabio Valentini wrote: > > On Sun, Aug 9, 2020 at 12:03 AM Jeff Law wrote: > > > So I've done two passes over the F33 build failures here: > > > > > >

Re: Fedora rawhide compose report: 20200809.n.0 changes

2020-08-09 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Sun, Aug 09, 2020 at 04:10:41PM +, Fedora Rawhide Report wrote: > OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20200808.n.0 > NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20200809.n.0 ...snip... > = DOWNGRADED PACKAGES = > Package: igt-gpu-tools-1.25-1.20200808git9f09772.fc33 > Old package:

Re: Unable to login with FAS

2020-08-09 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Sun, Aug 09, 2020 at 11:06:21PM +0800, Qiyu Yan wrote: > Scott Talbert 于2020年8月9日周日 下午10:30写道: > > > > There seems to be some sort of problem with FAS right now. (I would have > > reported this to fedora-infrastructure Pagure, but I can't log in to > > Pagure.) :( We do have a handy

Re: Using a side tag

2020-08-08 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Sat, Aug 08, 2020 at 08:52:22PM -0400, Scott Talbert wrote: > I'm trying to use a side tag to rebuild a package (wxGTK) and its dependent > (CubicSDR) due to an soname bump. > > I rebuilt wxGTK and then once it completed, I started a build for CubicSDR. > However, CubicSDR's build still used

Re: Respinning rawhide images every filesystem update?

2020-08-08 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Thu, Aug 06, 2020 at 12:02:09PM -0400, Alex Scheel wrote: > - Original Message - > > From: "Stephen John Smoogen" > > To: "Development discussions related to Fedora" > > > > Sent: Thursday, August 6, 2020 10:55:51 AM > > Subject: Re: Respinning rawhide images every filesystem update?

Re: Still problems with s390x builds

2020-08-08 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Sat, Aug 08, 2020 at 05:57:07PM +0200, Andrea Musuruane wrote: > On Sat, Aug 8, 2020 at 5:46 PM José Abílio Matos wrote: > > > On Saturday, 8 August 2020 16.26.39 WEST Andrea Musuruane wrote: > > > > > Can someone please check? > > > > > > > > > > Thanks! > > > > > > > > > > Andrea > > > > >

Re: Test machines for s390x?

2020-08-06 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Thu, Aug 06, 2020 at 06:45:22PM +0200, Dan Horák wrote: > On Wed, 5 Aug 2020 21:21:02 -0700 > Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > > On Wed, Aug 05, 2020 at 11:26:34PM -0400, Elliott Sales de Andrade wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > Now that ppc64 is gone, s390x is t

Re: Test machines for s390x?

2020-08-05 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Wed, Aug 05, 2020 at 11:26:34PM -0400, Elliott Sales de Andrade wrote: > Hi, > > Now that ppc64 is gone, s390x is the only big-endian architecture > left. Bugs around endianness are not usually difficult to fix, _if_ I > can debug it and see where exactly the problem is. However, this >

Re: Respinning rawhide images every filesystem update?

2020-08-05 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Mon, Aug 03, 2020 at 02:36:40PM -0400, Alex Scheel wrote: > Hey list, > > > How do Fedora rawhide images get respun? Every time filesystem updates, They are rebuild in every rawhide nightly compose. Here's the one from last night/this morning:

Re: ARM: Installed (but unpackaged) file(s) found: /usr/bin/....gdb-index-9pY4kY

2020-08-04 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Tue, Aug 04, 2020 at 07:52:54PM +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote: > On 04. 08. 20 18:16, Florian Weimer wrote: > > * Miro Hrončok: > > > > > Hello, I've got this failure I cannot really understand, it happens on > > > armv7hl only (aarch64 and s390x were cancelled): > > > > > > Checking for

Re: Headsup: dbus 1.12.10-1.fc29 is missing systemd dbus.service file, breaking almost everything

2020-08-04 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Tue, Aug 04, 2020 at 09:45:40AM -0400, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > On Tue, 4 Aug 2020 at 09:37, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel > wrote: > > > > On 04.08.2020 13:58, Kamil Paral wrote: > > > So, how do we ban spammers from this list? CC devel-owner. > > > > Allow only CLA+1 group members to post

s390x builder improvements

2020-08-03 Thread Kevin Fenzi
ok. I did what I could with the resources we have right now to improve things on the s390x builders. 1. I noticed that we had the kvm instances oversubscribed on cpus (the host has 32, we had 42 used). So, I lowered all the kvm builders to 3 vcpus from 4. (Those are 15-24). 2. I moved the

Re: What do to about massive # of FTBFS bugs?

2020-08-03 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Mon, Aug 03, 2020 at 10:28:03PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > On Mon, Aug 03, 2020 at 04:04:57PM -0500, Richard Shaw wrote: > > I'm up to 21 and climbing. Technically two are failure to install... > > > > I'm confused if I should even fix these right now due to the various issues > > I've

Planned Outage - koji.fedoraproject.org - 2020-08-05 21:00 UTC

2020-08-03 Thread Kevin Fenzi
Planned Outage - koji.fedoraproject.org - 2020-08-05 21:00 UTC There will be an outage starting at 2020-08-05 21:00 UTC which will last approximately 3 hours. To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UTCHowto or run: date -d '2020-08-05

Planned Outage - koji.fedoraproject.org - 2020-08-05 21:00 UTC

2020-08-03 Thread Kevin Fenzi
Planned Outage - koji.fedoraproject.org - 2020-08-05 21:00 UTC There will be an outage starting at 2020-08-05 21:00 UTC which will last approximately 3 hours. To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UTCHowto or run: date -d '2020-08-05

Re: Fedora 33 Mass Rebuild

2020-08-03 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Mon, Aug 03, 2020 at 01:30:56PM -0400, Jaroslav Skarvada wrote: > > Most of my FTBFSs are in form: > BuildrootError: Requested repo (1785390) is DELETED > > Wtf? > > E.g.: > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1863168 > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1863196 >

Re: Lots of FTBFS bugs filed for S390x "BuildrootError: Requested repo (1785390) is DELETED" / "rpm.error: error reading package header" errors

2020-08-03 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Mon, Aug 03, 2020 at 05:21:58PM +0200, Hans de Goede wrote: > Hi All, > > > I just noticed that a lot my packages got a FTBFS because of > failing to build on s390x. The first set of rebuilds failed with: > > "BuildrootError: Requested repo (1785390) is DELETED" > > The second set of

Re: module build: BuildrootError: could not init mock buildroot

2020-08-03 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Mon, Aug 03, 2020 at 04:47:39PM +0200, Jun Aruga wrote: ... > So, I suppose previously it tried to build outputed platform (f30). > The other build id 9294 is f32, 9295 is f31, 9296 is f33. Ah, that would do it. I finally was shown the command to retire the f30 eol platform and did so...

Re: [Test-Announce] RIP: Thomas Gilliard (satellit)

2020-08-02 Thread Kevin Fenzi
Sad news indeed. ;( He will be missed... kevin signature.asc Description: PGP signature ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct:

Re: Fedora rawhide compose report: 20200802.n.0 changes

2020-08-02 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Sun, Aug 02, 2020 at 12:55:28PM +, Fedora Rawhide Report wrote: > OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20200731.n.0 > NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20200802.n.0 > > = SUMMARY = > Added images:4 > Dropped images: 5 > Added packages: 11 > Dropped packages:6 > Upgraded packages: 18240 >

Re: Another possible LTO failure in guestfish (or maybe readline)

2020-08-01 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Sat, Aug 01, 2020 at 02:03:40PM -0600, Jeff Law wrote: > On Sat, 2020-08-01 at 12:12 +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote: > > Hi, > > > > seeing the amount of fallout from LTO, I really think that this feature > > ought to be dropped from F33, and evaluated carefully for F34 (i.e., can it > > be done

Re: module build: BuildrootError: could not init mock buildroot

2020-08-01 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Fri, Jul 31, 2020 at 04:05:20PM +0200, Jun Aruga wrote: > Hi, > Sometimes once per a few times, I faced the following weird build > error when building Ruby modules. > Did you see it? Known issue? > > https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=48194471 > BuildrootError: could not

[EPEL-devel] Re: Continuing playground discussion

2020-08-01 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Fri, Jul 31, 2020 at 03:13:00PM -0700, Troy Dawson wrote: > We were having a good discussion about epel8-playground in the > Steering Committee meeting this week. Since we ran out of time I'd > like to continue it via email. > > Most everyone agreed that playground is currently a bit of a

Re: libcroco retired on Rawhide, breaking builds

2020-08-01 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Sat, Aug 01, 2020 at 06:35:30PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > On Sat, Aug 01, 2020 at 03:13:50PM +0200, Fabio Valentini wrote: > > On Sat, Aug 1, 2020 at 2:44 PM Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > > > > > On Sat, Aug 01, 2020 at 03:25:48AM -0400, Elliott Sales de Andrade wrote: > > > >

Re: libcroco retired on Rawhide, breaking builds

2020-08-01 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Sat, Aug 01, 2020 at 03:37:37PM -, Michael J Gruber wrote: > It is tagged as > > f33-rebuild > f33-updates-candidate > > now but not as > > f33 > > and bodhi does not know about it either. Is it possible/advisable to tag it > as f33 directly to get the other rebuilds going again? You

Re: libcroco retired on Rawhide, breaking builds

2020-08-01 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Sat, Aug 01, 2020 at 03:15:59PM +0200, Fabio Valentini wrote: > On Sat, Aug 1, 2020 at 3:12 PM Michael J Gruber > wrote: > > > > Well, that second mass rebuild made things worse for me. > > The time between the two was really short - we do need time to fix things > > (see below). > > The

Re: Another possible LTO failure in guestfish (or maybe readline)

2020-07-31 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Fri, Jul 31, 2020 at 01:37:25PM -0600, Jeff Law wrote: > On Fri, 2020-07-31 at 19:26 +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > On Fri, Jul 31, 2020 at 12:02:22PM -0600, Jeff Law wrote: > > > Looks like it's in the buildroots now. Let me know if that doesn't fix > > > the > > > problem. > > > >

Re: Rebase of fmt to 7.0.0

2020-07-29 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Wed, Jul 29, 2020 at 07:18:26PM +0200, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote: > On 29.07.2020 18:20, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > can you do it in a side tag > > OK. Got it. > > > and coordinate rebuilds with dependent packages? > > I'm not a proven packager. I cannot

Re: Duplicate package was reviewed

2020-07-29 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Wed, Jul 29, 2020 at 06:41:57PM +0200, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote: > Hello all. > > Duplicate package of libquotient - libqmatrixclient - was reviewed, > accepted and pushed to stable repositories. > > Not it cause conflicts. I guess you meant "Now" there? > > libqmatrixclient must be

Re: s390 builds failing with "All mirrors were tried"

2020-07-29 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Wed, Jul 29, 2020 at 10:25:24AM -0600, Jeff Law wrote: > On Wed, 2020-07-29 at 09:19 -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > On Wed, Jul 29, 2020 at 10:31:32AM -0400, Scott Talbert wrote: > > > On Wed, 29 Jul 2020, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > > > > > > libnbd fa

Re: Rebase of fmt to 7.0.0

2020-07-29 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Wed, Jul 29, 2020 at 05:01:08PM +0200, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote: > On 29.07.2020 14:44, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > Was this package built and then untagged? > > We delayed the build due issues[1-3] with the sphinx/doxygen > documentation generator. As a workaround, we decided to

Re: s390 builds failing with "All mirrors were tried"

2020-07-29 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Wed, Jul 29, 2020 at 10:31:32AM -0400, Scott Talbert wrote: > On Wed, 29 Jul 2020, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > > libnbd failed in the mass rebuild. I kicked off a second build by > > hand, and it failed in the exact same way: > > > >

Re: ceph -> qemu -> lots failing in the mass rebuild

2020-07-29 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Wed, Jul 29, 2020 at 02:40:18PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > qemu is uninstallable at the moment because ceph is uninstallable > because fmt was upgraded from 6 to 7 in the middle of the build > (resulting in an soname bump - it was announced). > > There are quite a few things failing

Re: xen soname bump

2020-07-28 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Tue, Jul 28, 2020 at 12:33:29PM +0100, Michael Young wrote: > On Tue, 28 Jul 2020, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > > On Mon, Jul 27, 2020 at 02:40:28PM -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > > On Sun, Jul 26, 2020 at 05:03:50PM +0100, Michael Young wrote: > > > > I am

Re: xen soname bump

2020-07-27 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Sun, Jul 26, 2020 at 05:03:50PM +0100, Michael Young wrote: > I am about to update xen to xen-4.14.0 on rawhide, which will update the > version on many libraries in xen-libs from 4.13 to 4.14. Packages that use > these libraries (I think just qemu) will presumaably need a rebuild > afterwards.

Re: s390x weirdness during mass rebuild

2020-07-27 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Mon, Jul 27, 2020 at 05:26:01PM +0200, Dan Horák wrote: > On Mon, 27 Jul 2020 09:10:59 -0600 > Jerry James wrote: > > > I don't know if this is related to what we saw during the previous > > mass rebuild, but on s390x only, the TOPCOM build failed with: > > > > BuildrootError: Requested repo

Re: ar (binutils) segfaulting in Rawhide - known bug?

2020-07-26 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Sun, Jul 26, 2020 at 10:17:03AM -0600, Jeff Law wrote: > On Sun, 2020-07-26 at 09:39 -0600, Jerry James wrote: > > On Fri, Jul 24, 2020 at 6:41 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > > On Fri, Jul 24, 2020 at 04:55:31PM -0600, Jeff Law wrote: > > > > What would help w

Re: Fedora flatpaks on non-x86 architectures

2020-07-25 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Sun, Jul 26, 2020 at 11:18:40AM +0800, Qiyu Yan wrote: > John Doe 于2020年7月26日周日 上午10:47写道: > > > > > I don't have a machine of other than x86_64 so I can't test, but does this > > > mean fedora's flatpak source is totally unavailable on secondary arches? > > > Or > > > I have any

Re: ar (binutils) segfaulting in Rawhide - known bug?

2020-07-24 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Fri, Jul 24, 2020 at 04:55:31PM -0600, Jeff Law wrote: > On Fri, 2020-07-24 at 17:55 -0400, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > > On Fri, 24 Jul 2020 at 17:51, Jeff Law wrote: > > > On Fri, 2020-07-24 at 22:40 +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > > > On Fri, Jul 24, 2020 at 03:37:05PM -0600, Jeff

Re: Modularity Improvements Objective

2020-07-24 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Fri, Jul 24, 2020 at 11:16:16AM -0400, Neal Gompa wrote: > > Unfortunately, MBS is maintained by a different team: the team that > maintains Koji. I am unsure about what they're planning to do, but I > hope they're going to do *something*. To add history here, MBS was written by and

Re: Infra updates?

2020-07-22 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Wed, Jul 22, 2020 at 04:31:20PM -0500, Richard Shaw wrote: > > I can't remember the name, but the tool that would let you see dependency > differences between releases. I have a package that's failing one of it's > tests but neither the package version (or even the spec file) have changed. >

Re: Infra updates?

2020-07-22 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Wed, Jul 22, 2020 at 12:24:07PM -0500, Richard Shaw wrote: > I may have missed it but I don't remember seeing any infra updates for a > while but I was out of town last week with limited connectivity... > > What's the current status? Are you meaning the Datacenter move? or ? Most all the

[EPEL-devel] Re: EPEL repos packaged for Fedora (for repoquery)

2020-07-21 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Tue, Jul 21, 2020 at 02:06:43PM +0200, Miro Hron=C4=8Dok wrote: > On 07. 07. 20 14:08, Tomas Orsava wrote: > > On 6/30/20 9:10 PM, Miro Hron=C4=8Dok wrote: > > > On 30. 06. 20 21:03, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > > > I don't think a package-review is needed?

Re: fedora-minimal container and registry negative feedback

2020-07-19 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Sun, Jul 19, 2020 at 11:12:53AM +0200, Athos Ribeiro wrote: > On Tue, Jun 30, 2020 at 09:22:45AM +, Dridi Boukelmoune wrote: > > > The tag page for fedora-minimal seems to be working > > > https://registry.fedoraproject.org/repo/fedora-minimal/tags/. Do you have > > > a link of the page

Re: fedbot spamming in #fedora

2020-07-19 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Fri, Jul 17, 2020 at 05:34:13PM +0200, Germano Massullo wrote: > Is it necessary to have in #fedora IRC channel, fedbot spamming 48 times > per day about Fedora respins update? > > [16:51] *** F32-20200715 updated lives available: > https://tinyurl.com/Live-respins2 Built by the Fedora Respin

Re: [Fedora-packaging] RPM-level auto release and changelog bumping - Fedora 33 System-Wide Change proposal

2020-07-19 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Mon, Jul 13, 2020 at 10:17:11AM +0200, Nicolas Mailhot via devel wrote: > Le dimanche 12 juillet 2020 à 13:07 -0700, Kevin Fenzi a écrit : > > On Sun, Jul 05, 2020 at 02:15:23PM +0200, Nicolas Mailhot via devel > > wrote: > > > > > > This is now done in the la

Re: Koji oops

2020-07-17 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Fri, Jul 17, 2020 at 02:25:32PM +0200, Dan Horák wrote: > On Fri, 17 Jul 2020 15:15:00 +0300 > Евгений Пивнев wrote: > > > What’s wrong with koji? > > Yet another maintenance jobs that I missed? > > https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=47345974 > >

[EPEL-devel] Re: Problems with yum update

2020-07-16 Thread Kevin Fenzi
vin -- > > -- > Warron French > > > > On Thu, Jul 16, 2020 at 4:12 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > > On Thu, Jul 16, 2020 at 03:59:23PM -0400, warron.french wrote: > > > I work in a lab environment that has a proxy somewhere on the network. > > > > >

[EPEL-devel] Re: Problems with yum update

2020-07-16 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Thu, Jul 16, 2020 at 03:59:23PM -0400, warron.french wrote: > I work in a lab environment that has a proxy somewhere on the network. > > I have my VMware VM running CentOS8 and have installed the > epel-latest-release package. snip... > > I don't know what to do to fix this. Can someone

Re: Firefox 78.0.2 for F32

2020-07-13 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Tue, Jul 14, 2020 at 08:33:04AM +1000, Bojan Smojver via devel wrote: > Would someone with sufficient powers mind queueing up this update? I would assume that person would be the one who built it... perhaps there's some reason for not wanting to push it yet. (CCing builder here) kevin

Re: [Fedora-packaging] RPM-level auto release and changelog bumping - Fedora 33 System-Wide Change proposal

2020-07-12 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Sun, Jul 05, 2020 at 02:15:23PM +0200, Nicolas Mailhot via devel wrote: > Le mercredi 01 juillet 2020 à 12:27 +0200, Dominik 'Rathann' > Mierzejewski a écrit : > > > > > To get beautiful changelogs, you also need to add > > > > > > > > > %buildsys_name Your name > > > %buildsys_email Your

Re: out of Koji disk space

2020-07-10 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Thu, Jul 09, 2020 at 06:15:54PM +0200, Jan Kratochvil wrote: > On Tue, 07 Jul 2020 21:11:31 +0200, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > I am not sure what to tell you here. Perhaps you could describe the > > reason you are working on the chromium debuginfo? Is it broken? Missing? > > Le

Re: TPM2 for disk encryption, clevis

2020-07-08 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Wed, Jul 08, 2020 at 11:58:58AM +0300, Marius Vollmer wrote: > Hi, > > we have some rudimentary support for Clevis in the Cockpit Web Console, > and now the question is, should we add support for "tpm2" to that? What does 'support for clevis' there look like? you mean just binding a encrypted

Re: Packagers with no corresponding valid bugzilla accounts

2020-07-08 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Wed, Jul 08, 2020 at 09:25:32AM +0200, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: > On Tue, Jul 07, 2020 at 10:38:01AM -0700, Michel Alexandre Salim wrote: > > Should we make the script more robust and ignore invalid watcher > > emails? Seems worrying if someone who's not even a packager can block > > packager

Re: out of Koji disk space

2020-07-07 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Tue, Jul 07, 2020 at 07:55:09AM +0200, Jan Kratochvil wrote: > On Fri, 03 Jul 2020 14:52:00 +0200, Jan Kratochvil wrote: > > On Thu, 02 Jul 2020 02:04:48 +0200, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > > On Wed, Jul 01, 2020 at 11:22:26PM +0200, Jan Kratochvil wrote: > > > > I will

Re: Could not execute build: database outage

2020-07-06 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Mon, Jul 06, 2020 at 03:03:07PM +0100, José Abílio Matos wrote: > While calling "fedpkg build" I got the warning (error?) displayed in the > title: > > ... > Could not execute build: database outage > > Apparently the build is over and well. :-) >

Re: [heads-up] soname version bump for evolution-data-server in rawhide

2020-07-04 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Sat, Jul 04, 2020 at 09:48:04AM -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > On Sat, Jul 04, 2020 at 06:37:09PM +0200, Fabio Valentini wrote: > > On Fri, Jul 3, 2020 at 8:10 AM Milan Crha wrote: > > > > > > Hello, > > > I'm sorry for a late notice, th

Re: [heads-up] soname version bump for evolution-data-server in rawhide

2020-07-04 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Sat, Jul 04, 2020 at 06:37:09PM +0200, Fabio Valentini wrote: > On Fri, Jul 3, 2020 at 8:10 AM Milan Crha wrote: > > > > Hello, > > I'm sorry for a late notice, the 3.37.3 release (will be done today) of > > the evolution-data-server has a soname version bump on the > > libedataserver

Re: out of Koji disk space

2020-07-01 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Wed, Jul 01, 2020 at 11:22:26PM +0200, Jan Kratochvil wrote: > On Wed, 01 Jul 2020 17:46:23 +0200, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > * Is this only on x86_64 that you need this? Or all arches? > > Sure we should have this on all arches but I haven't tested non-x86_64 yet. > There po

Re: Cleaning up comps packages in rawhide

2020-07-01 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Tue, Jun 30, 2020 at 05:46:11PM -, Ian McInerney wrote: > I have been going through the packages listed in the comps file for rawhide > (given in here https://pagure.io/fedora-comps) to clean it up and remove any > packages that are currently not in any Fedora rawhide repos, and to update

Re: out of Koji disk space

2020-07-01 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Wed, Jul 01, 2020 at 03:38:26PM +0200, Jan Kratochvil wrote: > On Wed, 01 Jul 2020 15:14:09 +0200, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > > At the moment we have about 10% of the hardware > > we shipped back in operation and there are at least 2 to 3 weeks to > > get the rest up. Getting up larger

[EPEL-devel] Re: EPEL repos packaged for Fedora (for repoquery)

2020-06-30 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Tue, Jun 30, 2020 at 06:46:43PM -, Miro Hrončok wrote: > To scratch my own itch I've packaged EPEL repos for Fedora. I've decided to > use the existing epel-release component for this (but I am OK to get a > different name, such as epel-repos). > > See

Re: Fedora Packager Dashboard available for testing

2020-06-27 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Tue, Jun 23, 2020 at 06:28:56PM +0200, Josef Skladanka wrote: > Hi, > > We'd like to announce public testing of the Packager Dashboard - a new > service for Fedora package maintainers aiming to provide all relevant > data: FTBFS/FTI status (from both Bugzilla, Koschei and health check), >

Re: Bodhi too eager to push updates to stable?

2020-06-25 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Thu, Jun 25, 2020 at 08:18:27PM +0200, Tomasz Torcz wrote: > On Thu, Jun 25, 2020 at 06:10:23PM -, Artur Iwicki wrote: > > Isn't this how bodhi always worked? One week (two weeks for EPEL) and > > if doesn't get negative karma, it gets pushed - no matter if it's an > > enhancement, or a

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >