Your calculations have to be off; I’m pretty sure there are way more than 100
Fedora users with a Nvidia GPU. The Linux Hardware Project alone reports 106
Fedora users with Nvidia GPUs (which is actually 29% of their sample) so that’s
a hard minimum:
> However, the majority of Linux PC users *must* step out of the happy path
> to get their hardware working for two cases:
>
> * NVIDIA graphics
> * Broadcom wireless
In the Firefox Public Data Report, GPU vendor is 69% Intel, 13% Nvidia, 13%
AMD, 5% other. I don’t think Broadcom wireless is
I don’t agree with this change, as it seems obvious that many users who do not
want proprietary software installed do not want repositories with proprietary
software in them installed either (whether or not these repositories are
enabled) and would want to have to opt-in to that too.
For Fedora, linux-hardware.org says 78% use EFI and 16% have Secure Boot
enabled. Not a very good data set, though Fedora telemetry wouldn’t be either.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to
Maybe Workstation could provide Déjà Dup in the default system to make
it discoverable and encourage users to create backups.
It has to be an installed application (can’t be a website), and most
users would benefit from having backups.
___
devel mailing
That’s one fewer reason not to use XFS then. It seems
Documentation/admin-guide/cgroup-v2.rst was not updated and still says
only ext2, ext4, and btrfs have writeback implemented.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe
The master branch for cp now defaults to copy-on-write on filesystems
that support reflinks, which should make copies more efficient if
Fedora starts using btrfs:
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/coreutils.git/commit/?id=25725f9d41735d176d73a757430739fb71c7d043.
Dolphin and KIO also seem like
I intended to demonstrate that cgroups can be used to cause the kernel OOM
killer to react appropriately and fast enough, implying that replacing the
OOM killer is not necessary and that replacing it by a userspace OOM killer
that does not account for cgroups can be undesirable. The exact same
> For now, kernel developers have made it clear they do not care about
> user space responsiveness. At all. Their concern with kernel
> oom-killer is strictly with keeping the kernel functioning.
This is false. The stated purpose of the OOM killer is not only to keep the
kernel alive. Nor does
This change would appear more acceptable if it was combined with removing the
Fedora user agent patch for Firefox
(https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/firefox/blob/master/f/firefox-fedora-ua.patch),
which is simultaneously a worse privacy risk and a worse way to count users
than randomized
That would be untrue.
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/freetype/freetype2.git/tree/src/smooth/ftsmooth.c?h=VER-2-8-1#n357
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora
11 matches
Mail list logo
