Re: Could not execute import_srpm

2019-04-10 Thread Martin Stransky
I see that too, filed it as https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/7704 ma On 4/8/19 12:08 PM, Antonio Trande wrote: Hi all. I can't upload source archive of new package 'smoldyn' $ fedpkg import ../../smoldyn-2.58-1.fc29.src.rpm Uploading:

Re: firefox-wayland and URLs in other programs

2019-04-03 Thread Martin Stransky
On 4/3/19 10:32 AM, Hans de Goede wrote: Hi Martin, On 02-04-19 17:24, Martin Stransky wrote: Please file a #BZ and let's investigate it there. As mentioned further down the thread, changing the default web application in gnome settings from firefox to firefox-wayland fixes this. Let me

Re: firefox-wayland and URLs in other programs

2019-04-02 Thread Martin Stransky
Please file a #BZ and let's investigate it there. Thanks. On 4/2/19 5:05 PM, Hans de Goede wrote: Hi All, To help testing firefox on wayland I'm running it as my day to day browser now, but when I click links (specifically in thunderbird) I get a dialog saying "firefox is running but not

Re: F30: Self-Contained Change proposal: Firefox Wayland By Default On Gnome

2019-01-28 Thread Martin Stransky
On 1/28/19 9:21 AM, Tom Hughes wrote: On 25/01/2019 21:55, Tom Hughes wrote: On 25/01/2019 21:24, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: On Fri, Jan 25, 2019 at 09:43:32AM -0500, Ben Cotton wrote: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Firefox_Wayland_By_Default_On_Gnome == Summary == Firefox is going

Re: Call for participation: Fedora Flatpaks

2018-09-07 Thread Martin Stransky
On 9/7/18 9:36 AM, Vít Ondruch wrote: Dne 7.9.2018 v 03:45 Owen Taylor napsal(a): I'd like to invite Fedora contributors to start creating Flatpaks of graphical applications in Fedora. We're still working on putting the final pieces into place to have a complete story from end to end, but

Re: Firefox with native Wayland backend at updates

2018-06-01 Thread Martin Stransky
On 06/01/2018 02:26 AM, mcatanz...@gnome.org wrote: On Thu, May 31, 2018 at 5:39 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote: We try hard to avoid messy menus with duplicate entries, and you get away with adding an extra desktop entry to an application installed by default on almost all Spins, for an

Re: Firefox with native Wayland backend at updates

2018-06-01 Thread Martin Stransky
On 06/01/2018 02:26 AM, mcatanz...@gnome.org wrote: On Thu, May 31, 2018 at 5:39 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote: We try hard to avoid messy menus with duplicate entries, and you get away with adding an extra desktop entry to an application installed by default on almost all Spins, for an

Re: Firefox with native Wayland backend at updates

2018-05-29 Thread Martin Stransky
On 05/29/2018 08:48 AM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: On Mon, May 28, 2018 at 10:56:27AM +0200, Martin Stransky wrote: We have Firefox 60.0.1 with native Wayland backend at Fedora updates now: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-c0674d672f https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org

Firefox with native Wayland backend at updates

2018-05-28 Thread Martin Stransky
We have Firefox 60.0.1 with native Wayland backend at Fedora updates now: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-c0674d672f https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-1f788d5c09 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-a62434cca8 The Wayland backend is available

Re: Security updates and batched pushes

2018-01-10 Thread Martin Stransky
On 01/08/2018 01:36 AM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: On 01/07/2018 01:38 PM, Christian Dersch wrote: Hi all, within the whole Meltdown and Spectre story I realized that Koji pushes even security updates to batched only, not directly to stable. In The critera for bypassing batched is if the update is

Re: Call for testing - Firefox 57

2017-11-06 Thread Martin Stransky
On 11/06/2017 11:50 AM, Vít Ondruch wrote: Dne 12.10.2017 v 10:58 Martin Stransky napsal(a): On 10/12/2017 10:52 AM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: On Thu, Oct 12, 2017 at 09:57:20AM +0200, Martin Stransky wrote: - and disabled XUL extensions For people who don't follow the internals of how

Re: Updates for Firefox 57 beta

2017-10-16 Thread Martin Stransky
On 10/16/2017 11:10 AM, James Hogarth wrote: On 16 October 2017 at 10:00, Martin Stransky <stran...@redhat.com> wrote: On 10/15/2017 03:58 PM, Gerald B. Cox wrote: On Sun, Oct 15, 2017 at 3:45 AM, Alexander Ploumistos < alex.ploumis...@gmail.com> wrote: Hello, Now that FES

Re: Updates for Firefox 57 beta

2017-10-16 Thread Martin Stransky
On 10/15/2017 03:58 PM, Gerald B. Cox wrote: On Sun, Oct 15, 2017 at 3:45 AM, Alexander Ploumistos < alex.ploumis...@gmail.com> wrote: Hello, Now that FESCo has ruled that "firefox 57beta is removed from f25/f26 updates-testing but stays in f27/rawhide", could we at least keep getting new

Re: Updates for Firefox 57 beta

2017-10-16 Thread Martin Stransky
On 10/15/2017 11:04 PM, Greg Evenden wrote: Hello, Now that FESCo has ruled that "firefox 57beta is removed from f25/f26 updates-testing but stays in f27/rawhide", could we at least keep getting new builds in koji for f25/f26? Judging by the feedback in bodhi, the various threads here, rhbz and

Re: Why is Fx 57 in Updates Testing?

2017-10-13 Thread Martin Stransky
On 10/13/2017 01:29 PM, Peter Oliver wrote: On Thu, 12 Oct 2017, Adam Williamson wrote: it sounds like downgrading from 56 to 52 (the most recent ESR), aside from the epoch bump it'd require on our side, is not straightforward (it seems there were profile changes between 56 and 52). Ouch.

Re: Call for testing - Firefox 57

2017-10-12 Thread Martin Stransky
On 10/12/2017 11:16 AM, Alexander Ploumistos wrote: On Thu, Oct 12, 2017 at 10:57 AM, Martin Stransky <stran...@redhat.com> wrote: and also expect new versions there. Please give it a shot and report any issue to our [1] or Mozilla bugzilla [2]. Hi Martin, Do you want feedback in

Re: Call for testing - Firefox 57

2017-10-12 Thread Martin Stransky
On 10/12/2017 10:52 AM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: On Thu, Oct 12, 2017 at 09:57:20AM +0200, Martin Stransky wrote: - and disabled XUL extensions For people who don't follow the internals of how Firefox works, this means all extensions you have installed will stop working. Apparently

Re: Call for testing - Firefox 57

2017-10-12 Thread Martin Stransky
On 10/12/2017 09:57 AM, Martin Stransky wrote: Hi folks, let's have some fun with upcoming Firefox 57 a.k.a Firefox Quantum. This is a major Firefox update with key - pleasant and unpleasant - changes: - fastest than ever with Rust, CSS Stylo, Sandbox... - new "Photon" look - an

Re: Why is Fx 57 in Updates Testing?

2017-10-12 Thread Martin Stransky
On 10/12/2017 10:48 AM, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote: On Thursday, 12 October 2017 at 10:08, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: In practical terms, FF57 disables all extensions. I had forgotten how unusable the web has become without NoScript ... Have you tested with the latest noscript?

Call for testing - Firefox 57

2017-10-12 Thread Martin Stransky
Hi folks, let's have some fun with upcoming Firefox 57 a.k.a Firefox Quantum. This is a major Firefox update with key - pleasant and unpleasant - changes: - fastest than ever with Rust, CSS Stylo, Sandbox... - new "Photon" look - and disabled XUL extensions according to the disruptive nature

Re: Why is Fx 57 in Updates Testing?

2017-10-12 Thread Martin Stransky
On 10/11/2017 09:42 PM, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: [] It is something we forget a lot.. but is a reason why older maintainers of XYZ software (Mozilla, X11, gcc, kernel, etc) would make sure that a heads up email about a major version change goes out. If you put out a heads up that

Re: Why is Fx 57 in Updates Testing?

2017-10-11 Thread Martin Stransky
On 10/11/2017 07:26 PM, Gerald B. Cox wrote: On Wed, Oct 11, 2017 at 10:04 AM, Heiko Adams wrote: Am Mittwoch, den 11.10.2017, 07:53 -0700 schrieb Gerald B. Cox: By definition BETA software is never intended to be pushed to stable. Fx 57 is BETA. When the STABLE

Re: Why is Fx 57 in Updates Testing?

2017-10-11 Thread Martin Stransky
On 10/11/2017 03:17 PM, Gerald B. Cox wrote: Was this on purpose? Fx 57 is BETA, and I was under the impression that BETA software was for RAWHIDE. Yes, I understand there is an annotation NOT to push Fx 57 to stable - but I thought that was the purpose of updates testing... software there is

Re: Why is Fx 57 in Updates Testing?

2017-10-11 Thread Martin Stransky
On 10/11/2017 03:52 PM, Tomasz Torcz wrote: On Wed, Oct 11, 2017 at 03:32:07PM +0200, Martin Stransky wrote: On 10/11/2017 03:17 PM, Gerald B. Cox wrote: Was this on purpose? Fx 57 is BETA, and I was under the impression that BETA software was for RAWHIDE. It's going to be stable in one

Re: Why is Fx 57 in Updates Testing?

2017-10-11 Thread Martin Stransky
On 10/11/2017 03:46 PM, Mátyás Selmeci wrote: On 10/11/17 08:32, Martin Stransky wrote: On 10/11/2017 03:17 PM, Gerald B. Cox wrote: Was this on purpose?  Fx 57 is BETA, and I was under the impression that BETA software was for RAWHIDE. It's going to be stable in one month. Fx 57 release

Re: Why is Fx 57 in Updates Testing?

2017-10-11 Thread Martin Stransky
On 10/11/2017 03:46 PM, Mátyás Selmeci wrote: On 10/11/17 08:32, Martin Stransky wrote: On 10/11/2017 03:17 PM, Gerald B. Cox wrote: Was this on purpose?  Fx 57 is BETA, and I was under the impression that BETA software was for RAWHIDE. It's going to be stable in one month. Fx 57 release

Re: Why is Fx 57 in Updates Testing?

2017-10-11 Thread Martin Stransky
On 10/11/2017 03:17 PM, Gerald B. Cox wrote: Was this on purpose? Fx 57 is BETA, and I was under the impression that BETA software was for RAWHIDE. It's going to be stable in one month. Fx 57 release date is 2017-11-14. Yes, I understand there is an annotation NOT to push Fx 57 to stable -

Re: Call for testing - Firefox CSD/titlebar

2017-09-19 Thread Martin Stransky
Do you mind to file at BZ please? Thanks, ma. On 09/16/2017 06:15 PM, Christian Dersch wrote: I can confirm this behaviour @KDE Plasma and also i3 window manager. On 09/16/2017 06:03 PM, Mattia Verga wrote: On KDE the result is terrible. I get a window inside another window:

Call for testing - Firefox CSD/titlebar

2017-09-15 Thread Martin Stransky
Guys, there's available [1] new Firefox package with emulated CSD rendering [2]. What does it mean for you? Firefox renders CSD decorations on its own then and you don't see the default gnome titlebar on top of the main window and you get a "Chromish" look. That should also work with Firefox

Re: firefox-55.0.2-2.fc26.x86_64 conflicts with pkgconfig(nspr) >= 4.16

2017-08-30 Thread Martin Stransky
On 08/24/2017 04:46 PM, Dridi Boukelmoune wrote: Hello, For some reason I fail to understand, a non-devel package is conflicting with a devel package :-/ According to dnf it's the only explicit conflict for the package: $ dnf repoquery --conflicts firefox-55.0.2-2.fc26.x86_64

Retired package - xulrunner

2017-06-15 Thread Martin Stransky
Hello, Xulrunner is no longer supported by upstream and contains known security bugs so we decided to retire it from master (will be still available for Fedora 26). If any project needs that package it has to bundle it. ma. ___ devel mailing list

Re: Firefox 52.0.1: CVE-2017-5428

2017-03-22 Thread Martin Stransky
On 03/22/2017 01:22 AM, Bojan Smojver wrote: Does anyone know whether the fix for this problem is already in F25 builds of FF or should a new build be prepared and pushed to fix this? See: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1433819 Sorry I overlooked this one. Builds are in koji

Firefox 52 - ALSA backend disabled

2017-03-13 Thread Martin Stransky
Hi, ALSA backend is no longer available in official Fedora Firefox builds [1] since it has been deprecated by Mozilla and no longer maintained [2]. If you still want to use ALSA on Fedora builds, you just need to rebuild Firefox with such option. Just set "alsa_backend" to 1 and run the

flatpak app launch script

2017-02-01 Thread Martin Stransky
Hi, I feel that launching a flatpak app from command line a bit regression from rpm packages. It's really different to type: $firefox or $flatpak run org.mozilla.Firefox Especially when "flatpak run org.mozilla" carries no information for user, they just want to launch the app and don't

Re: Important: NSS + Firefox + Thunderbird + Seamonkey + Icecat + Xulrunner

2017-01-23 Thread Martin Stransky
On 01/21/2017 04:33 PM, Christian Dersch wrote: On 01/21/2017 04:15 PM, Kai Engert wrote: I've disabled autokarma. Thanks :) The current Firefox 50.x will go unsupported on Tuesday, replaced by Firefox 51. Usually new important security fixes are contained in the new Firefox update.

Re: Important: NSS + Firefox + Thunderbird + Seamonkey + Icecat + Xulrunner

2017-01-20 Thread Martin Stransky
On 01/20/2017 04:13 PM, Josh Boyer wrote: On Fri, Jan 20, 2017 at 9:52 AM, Kai Engert wrote: Hello, we are currently dealing with a tricky situation, that the NSS and Mozilla package maintainers have been discussing, and I'd like to publish our plan. The most recent NSS update,

Re: Firefox 49.0.2

2016-10-27 Thread Martin Stransky
On 10/27/2016 11:11 AM, Michael J Gruber wrote: Martin Stransky venit, vidit, dixit 26.10.2016 11:42: Thanks for pointing it here, I miss that minor update. Btw. a new #BZ at bugzilla.redhat.com would work even better. There are two security bugs marked as "High" which means

Re: Firefox 49.0.2

2016-10-26 Thread Martin Stransky
Thanks for pointing it here, I miss that minor update. Btw. a new #BZ at bugzilla.redhat.com would work even better. There are two security bugs marked as "High" which means "Moderate" in Fedora terms. The big ones has "Critical" rating and there's none fixed in this release. AFAIK the main

Re: Firefox 48 v Electrolysis

2016-07-27 Thread Martin Stransky
I believe it's disabled by default, because upstream enables it specifically for safe instances (no/safe extensions and so) by mozilla installer which is disabled in Fedora. You can enable it by your own in about:config, set browser.tabs.remote.autostart value to true. Note: some extensions

Re: Firefox on Wayland

2016-06-29 Thread Martin Stransky
On 06/28/2016 12:13 PM, Martin Stransky wrote: On 06/28/2016 08:41 AM, Samuel Rakitničan wrote: I've failed to launch the application properly under X.org and Wayland using the launcher icon in GNOME shell. But when I switched to Wayland, I executed the `firefox` command from "Ter

Re: Firefox on Wayland

2016-06-28 Thread Martin Stransky
On 06/28/2016 08:41 AM, Samuel Rakitničan wrote: I've failed to launch the application properly under X.org and Wayland using the launcher icon in GNOME shell. But when I switched to Wayland, I executed the `firefox` command from "Terminix" and it worked under XWayland with no regressions so

Re: Firefox on Wayland

2016-06-22 Thread Martin Stransky
22, 2016 at 1:12 PM, Martin Stransky <stran...@redhat.com> wrote: Hi Folks, Firefox with native Wayland support is available here: https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/stransky/firefox-wayland/ https://stransky.fedorapeople.org/firefox-47.0-6.wayland.fc25.src.rpm It's an official

Firefox on Wayland

2016-06-22 Thread Martin Stransky
Hi Folks, Firefox with native Wayland support is available here: https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/stransky/firefox-wayland/ https://stransky.fedorapeople.org/firefox-47.0-6.wayland.fc25.src.rpm It's an official Fedora Firefox package (47.0) + Wayland patch and it replaces your distro

Firefox - call for testing (Gtk3 effort)

2016-02-03 Thread Martin Stransky
Folks, we see many Gtk3 crashes in Firefox recently (https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1239962) which comes from Gtk3 system library. If you's like to help here, please install latest FF updates from koji: F23: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-8344bd0b61 F22:

Re: Firefox - call for testing (Gtk3 effort)

2016-02-03 Thread Martin Stransky
Also please remove Firefox from ABRT blacklist at: /etc/abrt/abrt-action-save-package-data.conf ma. On 02/03/2016 10:43 AM, Martin Stransky wrote: Folks, we see many Gtk3 crashes in Firefox recently (https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1239962) which comes from Gtk3 system library

Re: Firefox - call for testing (Gtk3 effort)

2016-02-03 Thread Martin Stransky
closing. Jakub On 02/03/2016 10:43 AM, Martin Stransky wrote: Folks, we see many Gtk3 crashes in Firefox recently (https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1239962) which comes from Gtk3 system library. If you's like to help here, please install latest FF updates from koji: F23: https

Re: Firefox - call for testing (Gtk3 effort)

2016-02-03 Thread Martin Stransky
On 02/03/2016 02:45 PM, Jakub Jelen wrote: On 02/03/2016 10:53 AM, Martin Stransky wrote: Also please remove Firefox from ABRT blacklist at: /etc/abrt/abrt-action-save-package-data.conf ma. On 02/03/2016 10:43 AM, Martin Stransky wrote: Folks, we see many Gtk3 crashes in Firefox recently

Re: Firefox - call for testing (Gtk3 effort)

2016-02-03 Thread Martin Stransky
On 02/03/2016 05:08 PM, Jonathan Wakely wrote: On 03/02/16 11:58 +0100, Jakub Jelen wrote: Don't know it it will help, but I see Firefox almost always crash when I open new window and try to close it on F23. Sometimes earlier after opening the windows, sometimes later after closing. I've been

Re: Xulrunner - intent to remove from Fedora 24

2016-01-28 Thread Martin Stransky
On 01/28/2016 08:52 PM, Samuel Sieb wrote: On 01/27/2016 10:17 PM, Ben Rosser wrote: It's been a while since I've used it, but chatzilla appears to still under active development here: https://hg.mozilla.org/chatzilla/shortlog. Yes, it is still somewhat active. I am one of the upstream

Re: Xulrunner - intent to remove from Fedora 24

2016-01-27 Thread Martin Stransky
On 01/26/2016 06:48 PM, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: On 26 January 2016 at 10:18, Yaakov Selkowitz <yselk...@redhat.com> wrote: On 2016-01-26 08:55, Richard Hughes wrote: On 26 January 2016 at 12:51, Martin Stransky <stran...@redhat.com> wrote: does anyone use the xulru

Xulrunner - intent to remove from Fedora 24

2016-01-26 Thread Martin Stransky
Hi, does anyone use the xulrunner package? (and gecko-devel actually). Mozilla does not maintain it any more and the XUL as technology is going to be removed/deprecated. I'd like to remove the package from Fedora 24. ma. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Retired - nspluginwrapper

2015-12-07 Thread Martin Stransky
Hi Folks, I'm going to retire and remove nspluginwrapper from Fedora 24 and newer [1]. Firefox and Chromium does not use that any more. Please speak up if you need that. ma. [1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1289053 -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Firefox addon signing

2015-08-28 Thread Martin Stransky
On 08/27/2015 04:40 PM, Alexander Ploumistos wrote: Aren't the addons that we ship in fedora a bunch of text files zipped in an xpi archive? It is kind of awkward to send them back and forth, but if there are no other binaries, does it go against a particular policy? Or we could decide that we

Re: Firefox addon signing

2015-08-28 Thread Martin Stransky
On 08/28/2015 11:00 AM, Alexander Ploumistos wrote: On Fri, Aug 28, 2015 at 10:18 AM, Martin Stransky stran...@redhat.com wrote: Can we ship addons which are already signed by Mozilla? Or does Fedora packager modify them somehow? It seems that even when the source is an xpi file, rpm treats

Re: Firefox addon signing

2015-08-28 Thread Martin Stransky
On 08/28/2015 11:34 AM, Alexander Ploumistos wrote: On Fri, Aug 28, 2015 at 12:24 PM, Martin Stransky stran...@redhat.com wrote: Thanks for the info. Actually is there any reason why Fedora packager would need to modify the original extension? That depends on the extension and its

Re: Firefox addon signing

2015-08-28 Thread Martin Stransky
On 08/28/2015 11:40 AM, Emmanuel Seyman wrote: * Martin Stransky [28/08/2015 11:24] : Thanks for the info. Actually is there any reason why Fedora packager would need to modify the original extension? If there is a security issue with an extension, the packager might well want to distribute

Re: Firefox testing - offscreen surfaces and OMTC

2015-08-25 Thread Martin Stransky
On 08/25/2015 12:09 PM, Kamil Paral wrote: I'm seeing flickering (e.g. with arstechnica) on 01:00.0 VGA compatible controller: Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. [AMD/ATI] RV620/M82 [Mobility Radeon HD 3450/3470] with native drivers (F22). I have seen heavy flickering on mapy.cz (online maps)

Re: Firefox testing - offscreen surfaces and OMTC

2015-08-24 Thread Martin Stransky
it to release yet: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=84252 What do you mean here by acceleration? The offscreen surfaces referenced in this post are CPU rendering. ma. On 08/21/2015 01:33 AM, Martin Stransky wrote: Folks, I'd use some testing for new Firefox feature - offscreen

Re: Firefox testing - offscreen surfaces and OMTC

2015-08-24 Thread Martin Stransky
On 08/24/2015 09:43 AM, drago01 wrote: On Mon, Aug 24, 2015 at 8:54 AM, Martin Stransky stran...@redhat.com wrote: On 08/21/2015 08:28 PM, Thomas Daede wrote: I've been running nightly with this enabled for quite a while on Intel and it's been fine. Note that OMTC is required for e10s

Re: Firefox testing - offscreen surfaces and OMTC

2015-08-24 Thread Martin Stransky
On 08/24/2015 10:41 AM, drago01 wrote: On Mon, Aug 24, 2015 at 10:18 AM, Martin Stransky stran...@redhat.com wrote: On 08/24/2015 09:43 AM, drago01 wrote: On Mon, Aug 24, 2015 at 8:54 AM, Martin Stransky stran...@redhat.com wrote: On 08/21/2015 08:28 PM, Thomas Daede wrote: I've been

Re: Firefox testing - offscreen surfaces and OMTC

2015-08-21 Thread Martin Stransky
I see the same flickering on NVIDIA hardware. Intel seems to be fine. On 08/21/2015 03:06 PM, Alexander Ploumistos wrote: On Fri, Aug 21, 2015 at 11:33 AM, Martin Stransky stran...@redhat.com wrote: - Install Firefox 40 on Fedora 22,23,Rawhide (you'd need Gtk3 build) - go to about:config

Re: Firefox testing - offscreen surfaces and OMTC

2015-08-21 Thread Martin Stransky
On 08/21/2015 03:34 PM, Alexander Ploumistos wrote: On Fri, Aug 21, 2015 at 4:24 PM, Martin Stransky stran...@redhat.com wrote: I see the same flickering on NVIDIA hardware. Intel seems to be fine. Which model? Is it using one of the older driver series? It's GeForce GTX 750 with nvidia

Firefox testing - offscreen surfaces and OMTC

2015-08-21 Thread Martin Stransky
Folks, I'd use some testing for new Firefox feature - offscreen surfaces [1]. It may also fix crashes when OMTC is enabled [2]. Browser should be a bit faster with those features on. How to test? - Install Firefox 40 on Fedora 22,23,Rawhide (you'd need Gtk3 build) - go to about:config,

Rapid release for security updates

2015-05-19 Thread Martin Stransky
Hi guys, is there any mechanism how to speed up release of critical security fixes by Fedora update system? For instance Firefox packages are released *week* after official Mozilla release which is really bad. Any idea here? ma. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Rapid release for security updates

2015-05-19 Thread Martin Stransky
On 05/19/2015 11:12 AM, drago01 wrote: On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 10:38 AM, Martin Stransky stran...@redhat.com wrote: Hi guys, is there any mechanism how to speed up release of critical security fixes by Fedora update system? For instance Firefox packages are released *week* after official

Re: Rapid release for security updates

2015-05-19 Thread Martin Stransky
On 05/19/2015 03:17 PM, Michael Cronenworth wrote: On 05/19/2015 04:12 AM, drago01 wrote: Why does it take so long? Most firefox uipdates get enough karma before they end up in testing. In that case they should be picked up by the next push (which is still a manual process afaik; so no idea how

FYI: Firefox - No more binary components in extensions

2015-05-07 Thread Martin Stransky
Forwarded Message Subject: No more binary components in extensions Date: Mon, 4 May 2015 11:03:12 -0400 From: Benjamin Smedberg benja...@smedbergs.us Reply-To: dev-extensi...@lists.mozilla.org To: dev-platform dev-platf...@lists.mozilla.org, Firefox Dev

Re: Flash plugin 0-day vulnerability in the wild

2015-01-26 Thread Martin Stransky
On 01/26/2015 01:48 PM, drago01 wrote: On Mon, Jan 26, 2015 at 1:40 PM, Martin Stransky stran...@redhat.com wrote: On 01/23/2015 10:51 AM, Martin Stransky wrote: Folk, There's a live 0-day flash vulnerability which is not fixed yet [1][2]. If you use flash plugin I recommend you to enable

Re: Flash plugin 0-day vulnerability in the wild

2015-01-26 Thread Martin Stransky
On 01/26/2015 02:12 PM, Ahmad Samir wrote: On 26 January 2015 at 15:03, drago01 drag...@gmail.com wrote: On Mon, Jan 26, 2015 at 2:01 PM, Ahmad Samir ahmadsamir3...@gmail.com wrote: On 26 January 2015 at 14:55, Martin Stransky stran...@redhat.com wrote: Where have you got that? Official

Re: Flash plugin 0-day vulnerability in the wild

2015-01-26 Thread Martin Stransky
On 01/26/2015 02:03 PM, drago01 wrote: On Mon, Jan 26, 2015 at 2:01 PM, Ahmad Samir ahmadsamir3...@gmail.com wrote: On 26 January 2015 at 14:55, Martin Stransky stran...@redhat.com wrote: Where have you got that? Official Adobe site [1] says the latest is 11.2.202.438 and flash download page

Re: Flash plugin 0-day vulnerability in the wild

2015-01-26 Thread Martin Stransky
On 01/23/2015 10:51 AM, Martin Stransky wrote: Folk, There's a live 0-day flash vulnerability which is not fixed yet [1][2]. If you use flash plugin I recommend you to enable the click-to-play mode for it. There's also a Fedora Firefox update with such change [3]. ma. [1] https

Flash plugin 0-day vulnerability in the wild

2015-01-23 Thread Martin Stransky
Folk, There's a live 0-day flash vulnerability which is not fixed yet [1][2]. If you use flash plugin I recommend you to enable the click-to-play mode for it. There's also a Fedora Firefox update with such change [3]. ma. [1]

Re: firefox/vimeo

2015-01-13 Thread Martin Stransky
Please file a bug for that at bugzilla.redhat.com ma. On 01/12/2015 08:59 PM, Nikos Roussos wrote: I noticed that I'm unable to watch Vimeo videos with Firefox without Flash plugin. Same is not true if I use the Firefox build from upstream. Do we disable something on our build that may be

Re: Firefox webrtc support in F21?

2014-12-15 Thread Martin Stransky
Hi, the WebRTC needs the h264 CISCO codec which was disabled in Fedora Firefox, see: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1155499 https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/ticket/1359 If you'd like to use the WebRTC (and Mozilla Hello service) in Fedora Firefox, go to about:config and set those

Re: Firefox webrtc support in F21?

2014-12-15 Thread Martin Stransky
There's also a good page about it: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/OpenH264 ma. On 12/15/2014 09:12 AM, Martin Stransky wrote: Hi, the WebRTC needs the h264 CISCO codec which was disabled in Fedora Firefox, see: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1155499 https://fedorahosted.org

Re: Firefox webrtc support in F21?

2014-12-15 Thread Martin Stransky
On 12/15/2014 10:29 AM, Florian Weimer wrote: On 12/15/2014 09:12 AM, Martin Stransky wrote: the WebRTC needs the h264 CISCO codec Are you sure? I've always assumed that Mozilla was more in the WebM/VP8 camp. Yes, I may be wrong here. But it seems to be necessary for the Mozilla Hello

Re: Firefox webrtc support in F21?

2014-12-15 Thread Martin Stransky
On 12/15/2014 03:25 PM, drago01 wrote: On Mon, Dec 15, 2014 at 9:12 AM, Martin Stransky stran...@redhat.com wrote: Hi, the WebRTC needs the h264 CISCO codec which was disabled in Fedora Firefox, see: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1155499 https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/ticket

Re: Mozilla enabled ads in Firefox and they're active in Fedora

2014-11-24 Thread Martin Stransky
On 11/23/2014 05:50 AM, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote: The tiles are coming from Mozilla. So yes please explain how the advertisers can track me through them if I don't click them. Much depends on what's in the tile. For example an embedded 1 pixel transparent gif, commonly known as a web bug, and

Re: Mozilla enabled ads in Firefox and they're active in Fedora

2014-11-20 Thread Martin Stransky
On 11/20/2014 03:28 PM, Petr Viktorin wrote: It's not about tracking per se – I'm fine with e.g. opt-in usage reports that feed into research for making a better browser – that benefits me (in a very indirect and miniscule way, but in the end the purpose is for the *user's* benefit). Ads are a

Re: Mozilla enabled ads in Firefox and they're active in Fedora

2014-11-18 Thread Martin Stransky
Hi, It looks like the recent Firefox Adds does not break any Fedora rules so it's perfectly ok to ship it as is. The H264 codec download feature break the Fedora law and has been removed from Fedora. When Fedora rules the Adds out of the apps it will be removed from FF immediately. Until

Re: Mozilla enabled ads in Firefox and they're active in Fedora

2014-11-18 Thread Martin Stransky
On 11/17/2014 02:15 AM, Kevin Kofler wrote: Ralf Corsepius wrote: Well, how to put it ... Mozilla.com's role in fedora has many times been subject to controvercies, but doubts have always been ruled ;) They always get special exceptions for any and all Fedora policies that upstream does not

Re: Join to Mozilla Location Service in Fedora

2014-11-06 Thread Martin Stransky
On 11/06/2014 03:18 PM, Bastien Nocera wrote: - Original Message - Hi Folks, as you may know [0] Firefox in Fedora [1] is using Mozilla Location service [2] as a location provider instead of the Google one. I'd like to ask you to join the project, install the Mozilla Stumbler

Join to Mozilla Location Service in Fedora

2014-11-06 Thread Martin Stransky
Hi Folks, as you may know [0] Firefox in Fedora [1] is using Mozilla Location service [2] as a location provider instead of the Google one. I'd like to ask you to join the project, install the Mozilla Stumbler application [3] and help to improve the location accuracy. Thanks! ma. p.s.:

Re: Firefox Gtk3 test package

2014-11-04 Thread Martin Stransky
, Martin Stransky wrote: Hi guys, first $SUBJ is available at: http://stransky.fedorapeople.org/FirefoxGtk3/ It's just a src.spm and plugin support it not finished (don't browse youtube ;-)) but may work as a preview. I'll provide Fedora builds and repo later. ma. -- devel mailing list devel

Re: Firefox Gtk3 test package

2014-11-04 Thread Martin Stransky
IMO It would be great if anyone can step in, rebuild the gtk3 package for other Fedora's and maintain the copr repo. I can help with any issues with that so feel free to ask. ma. On 11/04/2014 12:37 PM, Martin Stransky wrote: The Gtk3 Firefox is enabled for master (Fedora 22) now. If you'd

Re: Bodhi-Problem? - Firefox 32 / Thunderbird 31.1

2014-09-08 Thread Martin Stransky
On 09/08/2014 08:32 AM, Adam Williamson wrote: On Sun, 2014-09-07 at 12:17 -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote: 0) The autoqa note above. The maintainer could override that and push to testing. 2) F21 is currently in Alpha freeze. Only updates that fix accepted blockers or freeze exceptions go to

Re: Firefox Gtk3 test package

2014-09-04 Thread Martin Stransky
On 09/03/2014 09:58 AM, Kẏra wrote: Testing has been great! I still really appreciate this repo. There have been a few firefox releases plus Fedora 21 is no longer rawhide so that could use its own repo. Any plans to update soon? I've been able to find these two bugs (though I haven't been able

Re: Firefox Gtk3 test package

2014-06-10 Thread Martin Stransky
On 06/09/2014 09:04 PM, Kẏra wrote: On that note, I haven't seen a new build in a while! When can we hope for an update? There are some patches waiting upstream for review so when those are done. I'd like also update the firefox-gtk3 build to Firefox 31. cool! can you link to bugs / review

Re: Firefox 29.0.1

2014-05-14 Thread Martin Stransky
Why do you think it's fixed in 29.0.1? I see only some Android and network fixes there (http://hg.mozilla.org/releases/mozilla-release/). ma. On 05/13/2014 11:34 PM, Bojan Smojver wrote: Could someone please build that. The blank PDF print thing is a bit annoying with 29. Thanks, -- devel

Re: Firefox 29.0.1

2014-05-14 Thread Martin Stransky
On 05/14/2014 10:20 AM, Bojan Smojver wrote: On Wed, 2014-05-14 at 08:59 +0200, Martin Stransky wrote: Why do you think it's fixed in 29.0.1? I see only some Android and network fixes there (http://hg.mozilla.org/releases/mozilla-release/). http://www.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/29.0.1

Re: Firefox 29.0.1

2014-05-14 Thread Martin Stransky
On 05/14/2014 12:37 PM, Bojan Smojver wrote: On May 14, 2014 7:57:25 PM GMT+10:00, Martin Stransky stran...@redhat.com wrote: The release notes are wrong, the patch is not applied in 29.0.1 but only in an upcoming Firefox 30. Sure works in Windows with 29.0.1. Actually it works because

Re: Firefox Gtk3 test package

2014-03-28 Thread Martin Stransky
On 03/28/2014 11:44 AM, Kẏra wrote: First off, thank you so much for this! I have been using it and it is stunning. The difference is huge. Thanks! It also seems to be the only browser that has supported my HiDPI display (perhaps that's thanks to gtk3?). That's a great news, I was not

Re: advertisement in packaged software (e.g. Firefox)

2014-02-13 Thread Martin Stransky
From the original post at [1]: Directory Tiles will instead suggest pre-packaged content for first-time users. Some of these tile placements will be from the Mozilla ecosystem, some will be popular websites in a given geographic location, and some will be sponsored content from hand-picked

Re: Firefox Gtk3 test package

2014-01-28 Thread Martin Stransky
On 01/28/2014 10:59 AM, Maros Zatko wrote: On 01/16/2014 12:54 PM, Martin Stransky wrote: On 01/14/2014 07:12 PM, Maros Zatko wrote: On 01/14/2014 03:38 PM, H. Guémar wrote: What's the point ? Personally, it's mainly about not throwing gnome 3 HIG at people. There's absolutely no benefit

Re: Firefox Gtk3 test package

2014-01-17 Thread Martin Stransky
On 01/16/2014 08:19 PM, Sérgio Basto wrote: On Qui, 2014-01-16 at 12:47 +0100, Martin Stransky wrote: New builds are available at copr [1]. Package firefox-gtk3-29.0-3 contains working NPAPI plugin support, so flash and other should work there. Please report any issue to bugzila (firefox

Re: Firefox Gtk3 test package

2014-01-16 Thread Martin Stransky
/FirefoxGtk3/ On 01/13/2014 04:15 PM, Martin Stransky wrote: Hi guys, first $SUBJ is available at: http://stransky.fedorapeople.org/FirefoxGtk3/ It's just a src.spm and plugin support it not finished (don't browse youtube ;-)) but may work as a preview. I'll provide Fedora builds and repo later

Re: Firefox Gtk3 test package

2014-01-16 Thread Martin Stransky
On 01/14/2014 06:31 PM, Peter Robinson wrote: Is it possible to split the NSAPI components out into a sub package and hence remove the dependence on gtk2 for those people that don't use NSAPI plugins? You can build your own package at copr. We can add some config flags to firefox spec to make

Re: Firefox Gtk3 test package

2014-01-16 Thread Martin Stransky
On 01/14/2014 07:12 PM, Maros Zatko wrote: On 01/14/2014 03:38 PM, H. Guémar wrote: What's the point ? Personally, it's mainly about not throwing gnome 3 HIG at people. There's absolutely no benefit in keeping Gtk+2 longer. Gtk+ 2.24.0 has been released 3 years ago (january, 2011) and is only

Re: Firefox Gtk3 test package

2014-01-16 Thread Martin Stransky
On 01/14/2014 08:18 PM, Reindl Harald wrote: Am 14.01.2014 19:12, schrieb Maros Zatko: On 01/14/2014 03:38 PM, H. Guémar wrote: What's the point ? Personally, it's mainly about not throwing gnome 3 HIG at people personally if a GTK user does not want GTK3 i want a pure QT firefox to get

Re: Firefox Gtk3 test package

2014-01-16 Thread Martin Stransky
On 01/16/2014 01:04 PM, Reindl Harald wrote: Am 16.01.2014 12:56, schrieb Martin Stransky: On 01/14/2014 08:18 PM, Reindl Harald wrote: Am 14.01.2014 19:12, schrieb Maros Zatko: On 01/14/2014 03:38 PM, H. Guémar wrote: What's the point ? Personally, it's mainly about not throwing gnome 3

  1   2   >