[389-devel] Please review: PR 50987 - Add option to healthcheck to list all the lint reports

2020-05-14 Thread Matus Honek
https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/pull-request/50987 -- Matúš Honěk Software Engineer Red Hat Czech ___ 389-devel mailing list -- 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to 389-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of

[389-devel] Re: Github / Gitter (Chat service)

2020-04-27 Thread Matus Honek
On Sat, Apr 25, 2020 at 7:57 AM William Brown wrote: > > Hi all, > > In the past I have previously "name squatted" 389ds on github, which has > meant that I'm able to reserve 389ds on gitter - gitter is a web based chat, > similar to irc, but "cool" with all the kids these days (which really, I

[389-devel] Couple of troubles around using dsconf

2019-11-19 Thread Matus Honek
Hello folks, Context: My setup is a running dscontainer with exported /data. While developing (outside of the container) I am trying to run `dsconf ldapi://%2fpath%2fto%2fdscontainers%2fsocket security get`. Issue 1: I get IndexError exception: File

Re: Fedora 31 Self-Contained Change proposal: Ship BerkleyDB backend as a module

2019-08-06 Thread Matus Honek
u, Aug 1, 2019 at 6:57 AM Matus Honek wrote: > > > > On Wed, Jul 31, 2019 at 4:57 PM Stephen Gallagher > > wrote: > > > > > > On Tue, Jul 23, 2019 at 8:45 AM Ben Cotton wrote: > > > > > > > > https://fedoraproject.org/wik

Re: Fedora 31 Self-Contained Change proposal: Ship BerkleyDB backend as a module

2019-08-01 Thread Matus Honek
package so that BDB and HDB backends > > are required to be dynamically loaded. > > > > == Owner == > > * Name: [[User:mhonek| Matus Honek]] > > * Email: mhonek (at) redhat (dot) com > > > > ... > > > == Upgrade/compatibility impact == > > Server using BDB

[389-devel] Re: 389 DS nightly 2019-07-17 - 0% PASS

2019-07-17 Thread Matus Honek
A fixing PR, for the record: https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/pull-request/50503 On Wed, Jul 17, 2019 at 8:52 AM Matus Honek wrote: > > I guess not installing the initconfig breaks the ds-setup, sigh... > Looking into it. > > > On Wed, Jul 17, 2019 at 1:24 AM wr

[389-devel] Re: 389 DS nightly 2019-07-17 - 0% PASS

2019-07-17 Thread Matus Honek
I guess not installing the initconfig breaks the ds-setup, sigh... Looking into it. On Wed, Jul 17, 2019 at 1:24 AM wrote: > > https://fedorapeople.org/groups/389ds/ci/nightly/2019/07/17/report-389-ds-base-1.4.1.5-20190716git7466be3.fc30.x86_64.html >

[389-devel] Re: Environment variables in systemd

2019-06-20 Thread Matus Honek
On Thu, Jun 20, 2019 at 12:25 PM William Brown wrote: > > > > > On 13 Jun 2019, at 14:17, William Brown wrote: > > > > Hi there, > > > > There have been a few changes to systemd files recently so I wanted to > > check about how to correctly supply environment variables to the server. > > For

[389-devel] Updated commit message format

2019-04-04 Thread Matus Honek
Hello, I would like to bring to your attention a recent change in our Contribution Guide [1]. We have updated the recommended commit message format. In particular, the "Fixes " string prefixing the URL which will make our lives easier in case of pull requests by automatically updating the

[389-devel] Re: Filter does not work with Anonymous connection

2019-02-27 Thread Matus Honek
On Wed, Feb 27, 2019 at 9:10 AM Ludwig Krispenz wrote: > > > On 02/26/2019 04:42 PM, Matus Honek wrote: > > This kinda leads me to thinking we should implement ACIs management > > within the DSLdapObjects like this (probably specific to a particular > > subclass, to a d

[389-devel] Re: Filter does not work with Anonymous connection

2019-02-26 Thread Matus Honek
This kinda leads me to thinking we should implement ACIs management within the DSLdapObjects like this (probably specific to a particular subclass, to a degree). One that would take care of this added requirement for objectclass ACIs because of hidden .filter's behavour. Because that is currently

[389-devel] Re: Notes on ns-slapd and relationship to lib389

2018-08-13 Thread Matus Honek
I agree. Additionally, it will eventually make our lives easier once we start altering something filesystem related as we won't have to look for whatever scripting puts something somewhere (yes, I hate side effects, and yes, been there, even with setup-ds.pl in my short history). I'd rather have

Re: F29 System Wide Change: OpenLDAP without Non-threaded Libraries

2018-07-17 Thread Matus Honek
lease clarify what the plan is here? Thanks. Florian is right, the idea is to make changes to the source code (probably a downstream patch will be needed) such that the threaded library will be built twice, once with libldap soname and once with libldap_r soname, and the non-threaded libldap w

[389-devel] Please review: Ticket 49601 - Replace HAVE_SYSTEMD define with WITH_SYSTEMD in svrcore

2018-03-26 Thread Matus Honek
https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/issue/49601#comment-501820 https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/issue/raw/files/12f4095f8d725d76f60882d2a844a0e26ad20439a84e0bbdf3c9b34bd1bbd285-0001-Ticket-49601-Replace-HAVE_SYSTEMD-define-with-WITH_S.patch -- Matus Honek Associate Software Engineer Red Hat Czech