orphaning German dictionary/thesaurus/hyphenation

hello, i've orphaned these linguistic packages for "de" languages: * hunspell-de this tends to have a new release once or twice a year * mythes-de upstream is a bit odd in that there is a new automatically generated .oxt file once per day, but the file name never changes... * hyphen-de

Re: CUPS will change license since 2.3 version - now incompatible with GPLv2

On 08.11.2017 15:53, Hans de Goede wrote: > Hi, > > On 08-11-17 15:06, Solomon Peachy wrote: >> On Wed, Nov 08, 2017 at 08:54:03AM -0500, Neal Gompa wrote: >>> Is there anyone who could raise concerns to Apple about the license >>> change? Maybe convince them to dual-license it or something? >>

Re: F27 System Wide Change: Graphical Applications as Flatpaks

On 17.07.2017 19:26, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > On Mon, Jul 17, 2017 at 12:03:13PM +0200, Michael Stahl wrote: >> On 16.07.2017 12:54, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: >>> On Fri, Jul 14, 2017 at 04:59:37PM +, Debarshi Ray wrote: >>>> On Fri, Jul 14, 2017 at 09:44:

Re: F27 System Wide Change: Graphical Applications as Flatpaks

On 16.07.2017 14:10, Kevin Kofler wrote: > Debarshi Ray wrote: >> How about reliable online updates of running applications as a >> benefit? > > Upgrading RPM applications online just works. I do it all the time. The KDE > tools do not even implement offline updates (and IMHO that's a good

Re: F27 System Wide Change: Graphical Applications as Flatpaks

On 16.07.2017 12:54, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > On Fri, Jul 14, 2017 at 04:59:37PM +, Debarshi Ray wrote: >> On Fri, Jul 14, 2017 at 09:44:18AM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: >>> >>> If RPMs of the graphical application work fine now, what on earth is >>> the point of forcing packagers to

Re: Understanding the Fedora Modularity initiative (video + slides)

On 24.03.2017 13:34, nicolas.mail...@laposte.net wrote: >> Why would Solaris switch to rpm, when they already had SysV >> packages at the time, which are pretty much equivalent in >> functionality? > > Solaris at the time had degenerated into a barebones system, they > needed to find a way to

Re: Understanding the Fedora Modularity initiative (video + slides)

On 24.03.2017 10:35, nicolas.mail...@laposte.net wrote: > Hi, > > IPS is a tweak on rpm. I suspect a mostly overengineered one, SUN had > massive ego problems and looked down on Linux systems. So they could > not just adopt rpm, they had to change it sufficiently to one up > Linux peasants (many

Re: Get LLVM's libc++abi into Fedora, BZ1332306

On 15.02.2017 09:48, E.N. virgo wrote: >> I'm not sure if I follow. Supporting multiple C++ ABIs would make >> things more complicated for developers because they now have to figure >> out which ABI their project needs and if all the libraries they want to >

Re: Nautilus usability

On 11/28/2016 07:53 AM, Samuel Sieb wrote: > On 11/27/2016 10:40 PM, drago01 wrote: >> On Monday, November 28, 2016, Py > >> wrote: >> >An SSD drive might not have this problem, but a spinning disk >> >definitely >> >will. You should never try

Re: F24 GStreamer zero day

On 23.11.2016 01:57, Michael Catanzaro wrote: > Hi, > > Is anybody working on fixing [1]? > > The exploit is a little impractical in that it only works if you have > not updated any F24 base packages except GStreamer, but we should still > fix it. I don't see any GStreamer updates in bodhi yet.

Re: OpenSSL-1.1.0 COPR for Rawhide

On 22.07.2016 16:53, Simo Sorce wrote: > On Fri, 2016-07-22 at 16:48 +0200, Tomas Mraz wrote: >> >> 2. Add compat 1.0.2 package which would be used by 3rd party >> applications and also temporarily by applications that are not yet >> ported to the new API. However the current plan is to not

Re: Fedora development of Snap packages

On 15.06.2016 08:24, Florian Weimer wrote: > On 06/15/2016 06:27 AM, Andrew Lutomirski wrote: >> On Tue, Jun 14, 2016 at 9:07 PM, Florian Weimer wrote: >>> On 06/15/2016 04:11 AM, Andrew Lutomirski wrote: >>> I *strongly* disagree here. The xdg-app folks seem to be doing

Re: Firefox not working anymore over ssh?

On 29.03.2016 19:22, Tim Landscheidt wrote: > Michael Catanzaro wrote: > >>> Yes. This makes it work. Thanks a lot. > >> Then it was probably broken by this update: > >> https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-606ca05253 > > The "LIBGL_DRI3_DISABLE=1"

Re: Proposal to reduce anti-bundling requirements

On 15.09.2015 15:58, Simo Sorce wrote: > On Tue, 2015-09-15 at 09:41 -0400, Carlos O'Donell wrote: >> On 09/14/2015 08:29 AM, Florian Weimer wrote: >>> I think the real issue here is the ELF model with backwards/forwards >>> linking and symbol interposition. Ideally, we should load each DSO >>>

Re: Checking the ABI of packages submitted to the updates-testing Fedora repository

On 08.06.2015 12:37, Petr Pisar wrote: On 2015-06-05, Dodji Seketeli do...@seketeli.org wrote: The nature of programs written in these dynamic languages makes it quite hard to compare types used in the API entry points of a library Pedantic note: There is difference between dynamic vs.

Re: Fedora tcp_wrappers (missing) support for custom acl scripts, aclexec

On 09.01.2015 23:16, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote: Hello, I recently noticed Debian/Ubuntu has had support for aclexec in tcp_wrappers via a custom patch since 2006, so you can do this in /etc/hosts.allow or hosts.deny: sshd: ALL: aclexec /usr/local/bin/sshfilter.sh %a if sshfilter.sh

Re: rawhide report: 20141028 changes

On 28.10.2014 16:10, Adam Jackson wrote: On Tue, 2014-10-28 at 10:57 +, Fedora Rawhide Report wrote: [dragonegg] dragonegg-3.4-0.3.rc0.fc21.i686 requires libLLVM-3.4.so dragonegg-3.4-0.3.rc0.fc21.i686 requires gcc = 0:4.8.2-14.fc21 This one's a joy. dragonegg is a gcc

Re: Improving the offline updates user experience

On 17.09.2014 13:58, Miroslav Suchý wrote: On 09/17/2014 11:54 AM, Bastien Nocera wrote: All those OSes require reboots when updating the OS. Define OS. Firefox is definitely not OS. While systemd is OS. I am fine with reboot after systemd upgrade, but not after upgrading Firefox. the

Re: Maybe it's time to get rid of tcpwrappers/tcpd?

On 06/06/14 00:25, David Sommerseth wrote: On 20/03/14 20:05, Lennart Poettering wrote: On Thu, 20.03.14 12:20, Stephen John Smoogen (smo...@gmail.com) wrote: I doubt there are many people even using them anymore, firewalls are more comprehensive and a lot more powerful, and while every admin

Re: BerkeleyDB 6 symbol versioning and associated problems

On 07/05/14 15:39, Joe Orton wrote: On Wed, May 07, 2014 at 03:19:42PM +0200, Jan Staněk wrote: One of the planned parts of the F21 System Wide Change: BerkeleyDB 6 [1] is the introduction of downstream symbol versioning of both versions of the libraries (libdb with v6 and libdb5 with v5).

Re: The right way to git clone a subversion repo...

On 08/01/14 14:27, Darryl L. Pierce wrote: The problem is that it's been HOURS and Git hasn't finished cloning the tree. It's the third step which is taking forever to complete. I left it to run overnight (10 hours) and it never finished. I paused it, came to work, resumed it and it's still

Re: crypto consolidation status

On 03/12/13 19:58, Tomas Mraz wrote: On Út, 2013-12-03 at 18:46 +0100, Jan Včelák wrote: Hello list. What is the current status of Crypto Consolidation in Fedora? Is it still current and is the page up to date [1]? The page is mostly up to date. interesting page... under Packages to

Re: Abrt (was Re: Most buggy packages)

On 20/02/13 09:40, Jiri Moskovcak wrote: One thing we're struggling with now is the normalization of stacktraces which means deciding which functions are important and which are not. e.g. for kernel there are stacktraces with a lot of warn_* functions and only a few functions are different

Re: Static Analysis: some UI ideas

On 05/02/13 17:57, David Malcolm wrote: On Tue, 2013-02-05 at 13:02 +0100, Kamil Dudka wrote: On Monday 04 February 2013 22:37:45 David Malcolm wrote: Content-addressed storage: they're named by SHA-1 sum of their contents, similar to how git does it, so if the bulk of the files don't change,

Re: Proposed F19 Feature: Apache OpenOffice

On 04/02/13 01:37, Peter Boy wrote: By the way: As I learnt on Linux Day last year, LibreOffice still depends on OpenOffice and is in the process to rebase their code to OpenOffice 3.4 (or something alike). So I'm wondering about different set of features. how exactly does LibreOffice

Re: Proposed F19 Feature: Apache OpenOffice

On 04/02/13 13:59, Martin Sourada wrote: Also, going by your reasoning there would be no point in having Calligra either... Furthermore, technically LO is the fork ;-) technically, both Apache OpenOffice and LibreOffice are forks, since neither of them: a) are under the OpenOffice.org

Re: Fwd: [Libjpeg-turbo-users] jpeg-9, API/ABI compatibility, and the future role of this project

On 15/01/13 20:04, Xose Vazquez Perez wrote: On 01/15/2013 01:01 PM, Adam Tkac wrote: Another interesting thread is http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/message.php?msg_id=30352453 We are currently discussing drop of the https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/libjpeg-turbo-jpeg8-ABI feature

Re: Fwd: [Libjpeg-turbo-users] jpeg-9, API/ABI compatibility, and the future role of this project

On 16/01/13 16:55, Adam Tkac wrote: On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 01:02:57PM +0100, Michael Stahl wrote: On 15/01/13 20:04, Xose Vazquez Perez wrote: I hope other distributions don't use that release. FWIW i'm afraid i've had to build jpeg8 from source already to get a certain binary [1] built

Re: Fwd: [Libjpeg-turbo-users] jpeg-9, API/ABI compatibility, and the future role of this project

On 16/01/13 21:40, Tom Lane wrote: Michael Stahl mst...@redhat.com writes: read more carefully then: the git repo contains binaries built against different Ubuntu baseline versions, the older of which have jpeg6 and the newer jpeg8. [ shrug... ] So we'd be incompatible with some of them

Re: Couldn't we enable 256 colors by default on TERM?

On 26/06/12 18:45, Miloslav Trmač wrote: On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 3:24 AM, Matthew Garrett mj...@srcf.ucam.org wrote: We discussed this in fesco today and had a couple of concerns. Another one is that connecting to systems that don't support xterm-256 is not quite easy. In particular, there

Re: Eliminating automatic provides on private libs

[resent another time because the list automatically rejected my mail] On 27/04/12 10:13, Panu Matilainen wrote: [...] The short background is that for libraries which dont have a SONAME, rpmbuild fakes one based on the file name. The rationale for this has been that since the linker