The subject says it all.
Regards,
Milos
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
The subject says it all.
Regards,
Milos
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On 5.5.2010 12:17, Dan Horák wrote:
Does anyone still use preupgrade-cli or can I remove it from the next
upstream release? If anyone is that interested in it, could you
possibly help fix it up and maintain it? Thanks.
I use it quite regularly for updating my machines
+1 but don't have
Hi Rudolf,
a usual request: could you repost including the maintainer names?
Thank you,
Milos Jakubicek
On 2.5.2010 23:30, Rudolf Kastl wrote:
Hello,
i did a desktop-file-validate on all .desktop files in the current
rawhide distro (note rpmfusion too).
here is the result of only
On 29.4.2010 10:27, Rafał Psota wrote:
htop -- Interactive process viewer
I'll take htop, but you have to release ownership in the pkgdb so that I
can take it.
Regards,
Milos
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
grabbed antlr (since I already comaintain antlr3 which
depends on antlr) and would be glad if you request comaintainership!
Regards,
Milos Jakubicek
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On 6.3.2010 23:21, Till Maas wrote:
Good news everyone,
you can probably expect to receive more positive bodhi karma for your
updates in the future (or you already got unexpected much), because
there is now a script called 'fedora-easy-karma'[0], that makes
providing feedback a lot easier.
Hi Chen,
On 12.2.2010 12:50, Chen Lei wrote:
I realized from http://tukaani.org/xz/; the core of the xz utils
compression code is based on LZMA SDK http://7-zip.org/sdk.html, but
it has been modified quite a lot to be suitable for XZ Utils.
So I think we should ship lzma sdk for fedora in
:0.4.6-8.fc11.i586
libarchive-devel-0:2.6.2-1.fc11.i586
Updating libarchive to the F12 only affects a few stuffs(soname unchanged).
??2010-02-13 01:02:56??Milos Jakubicek xja...@fi.muni.cz
mailto:xja...@fi.muni.cz ??
Hi Chen,
On 12.2.2010 12:50, Chen Lei wrote:
I realized from
On 12.2.2010 19:17, Chen Lei wrote:
lzma itself already replaced by xz-lzma-compat several months ago.
xz-lzma-compat provides lzma=5.
Am I dumb, oh yes of course, this is since the xz review, sorry for
confusion!
Well then we are safe to go.
Milos
--
devel mailing list
On 30.1.2010 14:29, Paulo Cavalcanti wrote:
https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/2009-August/msg00462.html
I am not saying the points raised in the above link are not important, but
the solution is pretty obvious to me.
Obviously it isn't if you looked at the BZ link in the
On 31.1.2010 01:24, Paulo Cavalcanti wrote:
Anyway, the discussion was good and maybe it is useful to other people too.
:)
Well, really: if you want to change something, file the bugreport, or
get in touch with relevant maintainers. I'm not a tcl/tk/python expert,
but if you think that your
On 18.1.2010 13:17, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 01/17/2010 09:04 AM, Milos Jakubicek wrote:
Hi all,
is there any good way how to handle the situation described at
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=528524
?
I.e. you have a single
Hi all,
is there any good way how to handle the situation described at
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=528524
?
I.e. you have a single library (single soname) which can be compiled
with or without GUI support (with different ABI) -- and we'd like to
have both of them, of course
On 12.1.2010 01:14, Kevin Kofler wrote:
semantics) hitting so many packages is a very bad idea and that it's
unrealistic to get them all fixed for F13.
+ 1...speaking as somebody who's fixed dozens of packages after the F11
and F12 mass rebuilds and looking at the loong list referenced
15 matches
Mail list logo
