Re: RPM package for gql

2020-10-06 Thread Nico Kadel-Garcia
Why not look into the "pyprpm" tool to build a source RPM to start with, to see if it has the dependency stack of doom common to some other python modules? On Tue, Oct 6, 2020 at 12:19 AM Sreeraj wrote: > > gql from https://github.com/graphql-python/gql is very widely used python > client for

Re: Fedora 32/33 livedisks do not boot on M$ system(s)

2020-10-04 Thread Nico Kadel-Garcia
On Sun, Oct 4, 2020 at 3:01 PM Samuel Sieb wrote: > > On 10/4/20 9:36 AM, Marius Schwarz wrote: > > And still,we do not know why the f33 livedisc does not boot at all when > > inserted early > > AND > > why grub-install /dev/USBDRIVE (correct devicename ofcourse ) is > > overwriting the ssd boot

Re: Fedora 33 System-Wide Change proposal: systemd-resolved

2020-09-01 Thread Nico Kadel-Garcia
On Tue, Sep 1, 2020 at 10:21 PM John M. Harris Jr wrote: > > On Tuesday, September 1, 2020 7:14:35 AM MST Michael Catanzaro wrote: > > On Mon, Aug 31, 2020 at 11:49 pm, John M. Harris Jr > > wrote: > > > > > Michael, > > > > > > The file is /etc/nsswitch.conf. > > > > > > You're wasting

Re: Fedora 33 System-Wide Change proposal: systemd-resolved

2020-09-01 Thread Nico Kadel-Garcia
On Tue, Sep 1, 2020 at 3:34 AM Roberto Ragusa wrote: > > On 2020-09-01 08:52, John M. Harris Jr wrote: > > On Monday, August 31, 2020 8:32:49 AM MST Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote: > >> On 31.08.2020 17:07, John M. Harris Jr wrote: > >> > >>> ship a release with "fallback" to Google and

Re: Ditch RPM in favor of DPKG

2020-07-18 Thread Nico Kadel-Garcia
On Sat, Jul 18, 2020 at 1:21 AM Anthony F McInerney wrote: > > > > On Sat, 18 Jul 2020 at 04:19, John M. Harris Jr wrote: >> >> On Thursday, July 16, 2020 3:11:19 AM MST Dridi Boukelmoune wrote: >> > there was no reason not to replac it with regular apt >> >> Nico touched on these already, but

Re: Ditch RPM in favor of DPKG

2020-07-17 Thread Nico Kadel-Garcia
On Fri, Jul 17, 2020 at 3:15 AM Dridi Boukelmoune wrote: > > > Oddly, the subject of the original post infers getting rid of rpm but > > the post itself sounds like it's proposing something different and > > that's why I decided to speak up. > > Yes, poor joke of mine, keeps hitting home though

Re: Ditch RPM in favor of DPKG

2020-07-15 Thread Nico Kadel-Garcia
On Wed, Jul 15, 2020 at 4:29 AM Dridi Boukelmoune wrote: > > On Tue, Jul 14, 2020 at 8:39 PM Dishant Pandya wrote: > > > > Its ok to have something that builds deb packages on Fedora, but in my > > opinion RPM is far more better then debian packages. Also the Dnf and yum > > package manager on

Re: Fedora 33 System-Wide Change proposal: Make btrfs the default file system for desktop variants

2020-07-12 Thread Nico Kadel-Garcia
On Sun, Jul 12, 2020 at 7:51 AM Dominique Martinet wrote: > (Yes, that means applications need to start being concious of what fs > they are being run on, or at least the fedora configuration needs to do > that check for them) Good luck with that. It's a direct violation of the "object

Re: The future of legacy BIOS support in Fedora.

2020-07-11 Thread Nico Kadel-Garcia
On Tue, Jul 7, 2020 at 6:17 AM Gerd Hoffmann wrote: > > On Mon, Jul 06, 2020 at 01:26:31PM -0700, John M. Harris Jr wrote: > > I guess that shows how unfamiliar I am with UEFI boot Fedora. You would > > encrypt /boot to ensure that your boot images have not been tampered with, > > Well, if that

Re: [EPEL] rpmconf question for EPEL7 on Amazon Linux 2

2020-07-01 Thread Nico Kadel-Garcia
On Tue, Jun 30, 2020 at 2:18 PM Christopher wrote: > > Hi, > > I know Fedora doesn't directly support Amazon Linux, but I was > wondering if the package maintainer for rpmconf on EPEL was aware that > the latest version doesn't work on Amazon Linux 2, which recently > updated to python-3.7,

Re: Fedora 33 System-Wide Change proposal: Make btrfs the default file system for desktop variants

2020-06-30 Thread Nico Kadel-Garcia
On Sun, Jun 28, 2020 at 6:21 AM Antti wrote: > > Hello, > > I'm in total opposition to this proposal as a long-time Fedora user. The > btrfs is unstable and not ready for production. Most of what I'm about to > write is admittedly anecdotal but it's the only file system in Linux which > has

Re: RHEL 9 and modularity

2020-06-28 Thread Nico Kadel-Garcia
On Wed, Jun 24, 2020 at 10:45 AM Vít Ondruch wrote: > > > Dne 24. 06. 20 v 15:47 Miro Hrončok napsal(a): > > On 24. 06. 20 14:41, Vít Ondruch wrote: > >> Having python27 and python36 modules is fail, because these should be > >> 2.7 and 3.6 streams of python module. > > > > Oh. We are so sorry

Re: RHEL 9 and modularity

2020-06-20 Thread Nico Kadel-Garcia
On Thu, Jun 18, 2020 at 8:45 AM Josh Boyer wrote: Modularity has been an interesting idea on paper, but not worth the effort. It should not be used for RHEL 9. > It is always good to push the boundaries and search for better ideas > and improvements, and that is part of what makes Fedora great.

Re: Location of executable code

2020-05-22 Thread Nico Kadel-Garcia
On Fri, May 22, 2020 at 3:20 PM David Malcolm wrote: > Hi Steve > > Your email talks about "application whitelisting" and "executables", > and this thread seems to be getting in to the weeds about things like > the distinction between scripts vs machine code, and modules vs > scripts; code vs

Re: The price of FHS

2020-05-22 Thread Nico Kadel-Garcia
On Fri, May 22, 2020 at 4:37 PM Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > > > > On Fri, 22 May 2020 at 15:59, Paul Dufresne via devel > wrote: >> >> The File Hierarchy Standard (FHS), is a standard that define where the >> files of a package should be placed in the root directory of the >> systems. It

Re: Location of executable code

2020-05-22 Thread Nico Kadel-Garcia
On Fri, May 22, 2020 at 10:31 AM Steve Grubb wrote: > > Hello, > > I am working on our application whitelisting daemon. It uses the rpmdb to > derive trust in what's on disk. If we use the whole rpmdb, then the number of > files is large. So, to prune the amount of entries in the trust db down to

Re: FreeCAD dist-git check, WAS:Re: Aggressive updating (Python 3.9): Are we trying to hard?

2020-05-22 Thread Nico Kadel-Garcia
On Thu, May 21, 2020 at 1:04 PM Richard Shaw wrote: > > On Thu, May 21, 2020 at 11:56 AM Aleksandra Fedorova > wrote: >> >> On Thu, May 21, 2020 at 6:30 PM Richard Shaw wrote: >> > >> > On Thu, May 21, 2020 at 10:37 AM Przemo Firszt wrote: >> >> >> >> "FreeCAD -t 0" performs approx 470 tests.

Re: Aggressive updating (Python 3.9): Are we trying to hard?

2020-05-22 Thread Nico Kadel-Garcia
On Wed, May 20, 2020 at 3:39 PM Miroslav Suchý wrote: > > Dne 19. 05. 20 v 14:03 Richard Shaw napsal(a): > > Because Qt 5.13.x / PySide2 5.13.x is NOT compatible with Python 3.8. But > > instead of asking ourselves, "should we push > > in the VERY latest Python and hope it's ok?", we just patch

Re: Re-Launching the Java SIG

2020-05-18 Thread Nico Kadel-Garcia
On Mon, May 18, 2020 at 9:34 AM Ty Young wrote: > The "toolchain" isn't broken, other than Gradle developers not caring > about backwards compatibility but... It works for them, just as A toolchain with broken links scattered through it is not toolchain. Building up the .jar files as a

Re: Announcement: EPEL Steering Committee Changes

2020-02-18 Thread Nico Kadel-Garcia
On Wed, Feb 19, 2020 at 1:01 AM John M. Harris Jr wrote: > > On Tuesday, February 18, 2020 10:35:26 AM MST Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > > Hi, > > > > It has been a pleasure for me to be a part of and help lead the > > EPEL steering committee for the last couple of years. It has not > > always

Re: Packaging of Ansible collections

2020-02-09 Thread Nico Kadel-Garcia
On Sun, Feb 9, 2020 at 4:59 AM Igor Gnatenko wrote: > > Hello, > > Did anybody had an experience of packaging Ansible collections into an RPM? > > I guess if would be enough to put the files somewhere under > /usr/share/ansible, but not sure. Also I'm not sure what download URL could > be used.

Re: Package uses Gradle (retired) to build: what to do?

2020-02-08 Thread Nico Kadel-Garcia
On Sat, Feb 8, 2020 at 10:44 AM Neal Gompa wrote: > > On Sat, Feb 8, 2020 at 6:23 AM Ankur Sinha wrote: > > > > Hello, > > > > netcdf-java[1] uses the Gradle build system, and is required to update > > hdfview[2] to the latest version. Gradle, however, was retired[3] as > > "out of date, broken,

Re: Orphaning hibernate

2020-02-04 Thread Nico Kadel-Garcia
On Tue, Feb 4, 2020 at 11:19 AM Michal Srb wrote: > This is more complicated and it would probably deserve a separate thread :) > Java and Python are completely different ecosystems. And Java ecosystem > (apps/libs) is just inherently unfriendly to Linux distributions. It's not > necessary

Re: Java Dev Group and Fedora Quality

2020-01-26 Thread Nico Kadel-Garcia
On Sat, Jan 25, 2020 at 5:07 PM Bill Chatfield via devel wrote: > > I'm trying to find out what's going on with Java in Fedora. Fedora 31 was > released with a broken Eclipse. I subscribe to the java-devel mailing list > but there is no traffic there. If I go to "Join a Group" and click on "J"

Re: Mock build Fedora package on CentOS 7

2020-01-19 Thread Nico Kadel-Garcia
On Sun, Jan 19, 2020 at 2:08 PM Pavel Raiskup wrote: > > On Thursday, January 16, 2020 4:50:09 PM CET Ian Pilcher wrote: > > On 1/16/20 9:39 AM, Miroslav Suchý wrote: > > > https://github.com/rpm-software-management/mock/wiki/Feature-container-for-bootstrap > > > > Right, but it still doesn't

Re: Mock build Fedora package on CentOS 7

2020-01-18 Thread Nico Kadel-Garcia
This is turning into a "debug mock on CentOS" discussion, not a Fedora discussion per se. Please let me know if it should be over in the mock github.com issues instead. On Sat, Jan 18, 2020 at 10:56 AM Ian Pilcher wrote: > > On 1/18/20 5:07 AM, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote: > >

Re: Mock build Fedora package on CentOS 7

2020-01-18 Thread Nico Kadel-Garcia
On Thu, Jan 16, 2020 at 10:50 AM Ian Pilcher wrote: > > On 1/16/20 9:39 AM, Miroslav Suchý wrote: > > https://github.com/rpm-software-management/mock/wiki/Feature-container-for-bootstrap > > Right, but it still doesn't work. > > [pilcher@breadbox ~]$ cat /etc/centos-release > CentOS Linux release

Re: Effort to remove libdb

2020-01-16 Thread Nico Kadel-Garcia
On Thu, Jan 16, 2020 at 10:53 PM Jerry James wrote: > > On Thu, Jan 16, 2020 at 8:29 PM Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote: > > The lack of a good backup tool for Berkeley DB earned me nearly a year > > of contracting salary from the BBC to keep alive an obsolete Berkeley > > DB

Re: Effort to remove libdb

2020-01-16 Thread Nico Kadel-Garcia
On Thu, Jan 16, 2020 at 1:17 PM Jerry James wrote: > > On Thu, Jan 16, 2020 at 9:09 AM Filip Janus wrote: > > Hi all, > > as you maybe know the BerkeleyDB 6.x has a more restrictive license than > > the previous versions (AGPLv3 vs. LGPLv2), and due to that many projects > > cannot use it. > >

Re: Mock build Fedora package on CentOS 7

2020-01-15 Thread Nico Kadel-Garcia
On Wed, Jan 15, 2020 at 12:08 PM Ian Pilcher wrote: > > Is $SUBJECT possible these days? > > I've tried with both --bootstrap-chroot and --use-bootstrap-image, but > the build is failing with: > >ERROR: builddep command missing. >Please install package dnf-plugins-core. > > This happens

Re: Let's talk about Fedora in the '20s!

2020-01-15 Thread Nico Kadel-Garcia
On Tue, Jan 14, 2020 at 3:04 AM Benson Muite wrote: > Maybe am wrong about faces/fingerprints as passwords: > > https://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2019/05/08/5 There was also the infamous "gummy fingerprint" article from 2002: https://cryptome.org/gummy.htm And the mythbusters

Re: Fedora 32 System-Wide Change proposal: Enable fstrim.timer by default

2020-01-02 Thread Nico Kadel-Garcia
On Thu, Jan 2, 2020 at 2:48 PM Robbie Harwood wrote: > > "John M. Harris Jr" writes: > > > On Friday, December 20, 2019 10:59:52 AM MST Chris Murphy wrote: > >> Issuing the command once per week harms no one > > > > Based on what's actual in the Change proposal, this is not the case. > > > >

Re: Removing a commit

2019-12-21 Thread Nico Kadel-Garcia
On Sat, Dec 21, 2019 at 5:06 PM Kevin Kofler wrote: > > Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote: > > It is *possible* to branch from right before the commit, and put > > *that* in your branch or your local repo to work with. It's also > > possible to replace an upstream git rep

Re: Removing a commit

2019-12-21 Thread Nico Kadel-Garcia
On Sat, Dec 21, 2019 at 3:20 PM Fabio Valentini wrote: > > On Sat, Dec 21, 2019 at 9:11 PM Antonio Trande wrote: > > > > Hi all. > > > > Please, can you help me to remove this last commit on EPEL7 branch? > > > >

Re: Fedora 32 System-Wide Change proposal: Drop Optical Media Release Criterion

2019-12-14 Thread Nico Kadel-Garcia
On Sat, Dec 14, 2019 at 9:26 AM Justin W. Flory wrote: > For what it's worth, I like Miro's idea a lot but also haven't thought about > it extensively. I think this could prioritize these issues as > release-blocking when we don't have enough data to understand the impact of > this Change,

Re: Fedora 32 System-Wide Change proposal: Drop Optical Media Release Criterion

2019-12-14 Thread Nico Kadel-Garcia
On Sat, Dec 14, 2019 at 1:25 AM John M. Harris Jr wrote: > > On Friday, December 13, 2019 1:34:29 PM MST Mike Pinkerton wrote: > > On 13 Dec 2019, at 15:03, John M. Harris Jr wrote: > > > > > > > On Friday, December 13, 2019 12:53:57 PM MST Chris Murphy wrote: > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> What?

Re: Fedora 32 System-Wide Change proposal: Disallow Empty Password By Default

2019-12-06 Thread Nico Kadel-Garcia
On Fri, Dec 6, 2019 at 3:02 AM Lennart Poettering wrote: > Humm, so you turn off gpg verification of RPMs you install? Nah, you > don't, because you put trust in Fedora that the RPMs they build are > somewhat safe to use. That's what vendor trust means. Since regular > users (and even very

Re: Fedora 32 System-Wide Change proposal: Disallow Empty Password By Default

2019-12-05 Thread Nico Kadel-Garcia
On Thu, Dec 5, 2019 at 9:02 AM John M. Harris Jr wrote: > Please don't recommend to anyone to use passwords for SSH. That is incredibly > insecure, and if privileged users are using password-based SSH, that'll > quickly lead to a serious compromise of your entire system, depending on the >

Re: Fedora 32 System-Wide Change proposal: Disallow Empty Password By Default

2019-12-05 Thread Nico Kadel-Garcia
On Wed, Dec 4, 2019 at 9:24 PM John M. Harris Jr wrote: > > On Wednesday, December 4, 2019 6:02:07 PM MST Kevin Kofler wrote: > > John M. Harris Jr wrote: > > > > > Well, you could theoretically use ssh-agent (or equivalent), without > > > changing the protocol in any way. > > > > > > You need

Re: Fedora 32 System-Wide Change proposal: Disallow Empty Password By Default

2019-12-05 Thread Nico Kadel-Garcia
On Wed, Dec 4, 2019 at 6:01 AM Lennart Poettering wrote: > (One thinkable extension of homed's current model btw is to support > logind lingering by asking for the user pw using plymouth. this would > then mean you'd be asked to unlock your user during early boot like as > with classic disk

Re: What are the benefits of default modular streams over non-modular packages?

2019-11-19 Thread Nico Kadel-Garcia
On Mon, Nov 18, 2019 at 6:23 AM Mikolaj Izdebski wrote: > > On Thu, Nov 14, 2019 at 4:59 PM Miro Hrončok wrote: > > I've asked whether it wouldn't be in fact much easier to keep the default > > versions of our packages non-modular. > > > > Others have said they are interested in this as well. A

Re: bug 1767576 in fedora-review / mock and relative workarounds

2019-11-18 Thread Nico Kadel-Garcia
g dnf workarounds, and te zstd fix to build Fedora 31 packages on RHEL or CentOS operating systems. One of the critical fixes I've been doing is to include "BuildRequires: epel-rpm-macros" on anything that might build on a CentOS or RHEL OS. Nico Kadel-Garcia __

Re: Modularity: The Official Complaint Thread

2019-11-12 Thread Nico Kadel-Garcia
You mean like quota-devel? Sent from my iPhone > On Nov 12, 2019, at 4:14 PM, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski > wrote: > > On Tuesday, 12 November 2019 at 22:07, Stephen Gallagher wrote: >>> On Tue, Nov 12, 2019 at 4:03 PM Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski >>> wrote: >>> On Tuesday, 12

Re: Please, IMHO, resolve in some way the Samba MIT kerberos problem.

2019-11-06 Thread Nico Kadel-Garcia
On Wed, Nov 6, 2019 at 1:00 PM Dario Lesca wrote: > > Il giorno mer, 06/11/2019 alle 09.03 -0500, Nico Kadel-Garcia ha > scritto: > > > Can the Fedora samba maintainers do that? > > > > > > Thank > > > > > > > They are very welcome to my wo

Re: Please, IMHO, resolve in some way the Samba MIT kerberos problem.

2019-11-06 Thread Nico Kadel-Garcia
> Waiting for MIT kerberos to become stable and supported from samba > team, a simple solution is insert into official samba.spec, a flag for > easily rebuild it with heimdal kerberos, without substitute or modify > the .spec file. > > Something like this: > > $ rpmbuild --rebuild --with heimdal

Re: Please, IMHO, resolve in some way the Samba MIT kerberos problem.

2019-11-04 Thread Nico Kadel-Garcia
On Mon, Nov 4, 2019 at 8:39 AM Neal Gompa wrote: > The problem with the Samba team's advice is that it essentially > prevents the MIT Kerberos AD-DC implementation from getting any > better. Without people using it, we can't know what needs to be fixed. > The Red Hat FreeIPA team has been

Re: Blender for Fedora 31 does not support multimedia?

2019-11-01 Thread Nico Kadel-Garcia
This has been solved for Java versions, for gcc release, for databases, and for multiple python releases. /etc/alternatives mostly works, compat libraries work, SCL installs work. Let’s avoid inventing another packaging and naming scheme for this, we’re only just recovering from “modularity”.

Re: Switching Maven and Ant to OpenJDK 11

2019-10-26 Thread Nico Kadel-Garcia
On Sat, Oct 26, 2019 at 3:41 PM Tomasz Torcz wrote: > > On Sat, Oct 26, 2019 at 02:23:33PM -0400, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote: > > > > > > > > Any reasons? Defaulting to ancient software conflicts with our > > > > “First” foundation. > > > >

Re: Switching Maven and Ant to OpenJDK 11

2019-10-26 Thread Nico Kadel-Garcia
On Sat, Oct 26, 2019 at 1:07 PM Gerald Henriksen wrote: > > On Sat, 26 Oct 2019 15:59:27 +0200, you wrote: > > >On Sat, Oct 26, 2019 at 03:53:28PM +0200, Jiri Vanek wrote: > >> any package can switch to jdk11, but sysem jdk should be jdk8, at least > >> for some more time... > > > > Any

Re: Why Redhat and Fedora create rpms differently

2019-10-25 Thread Nico Kadel-Garcia
On Fri, Oct 25, 2019 at 12:40 PM Vít Ondruch wrote: > > > Dne 25. 10. 19 v 16:32 David Cantrell napsal(a): > > On 10/25/19 10:20 AM, Code Zombie wrote: > >> Just trying to get started with packaging. I started with a pretty > >> big app, and looking through tutorials, it seems Fedora and Redhat >

Re: Fedora 32 System-Wide Change proposal: Modules in Non-Modular Buildroot

2019-10-18 Thread Nico Kadel-Garcia
On Thu, Oct 17, 2019 at 8:09 AM Stephen Gallagher wrote: > > On Thu, Oct 17, 2019 at 7:53 AM Miro Hrončok wrote: > > > That was a representative example. I came up with it at 11pm after a > > > long day. Don't read too much into the specifics. The point was that > > > builds may require newer or

Re: Temporarily using `best=False' for EPEL-8 builds in Copr

2019-10-13 Thread Nico Kadel-Garcia
On Sun, Oct 13, 2019 at 5:58 PM Jakub Kadlcik wrote: > > > These bugs exist in RHEL 8 as well as CentOS 8 based environments. Why do > > you think that modularity will *ever* work this way? > > I don't know whether this question was aimed directly to me, but if so > ... I am sorry, I can't help

Re: Temporarily using `best=False' for EPEL-8 builds in Copr

2019-10-10 Thread Nico Kadel-Garcia
> On Oct 10, 2019, at 7:34 PM, Jakub Kadlcik wrote: > > Hello, > > currently, there is a problem with building EPEL-8 packages because of > DNF bugs regarding modularity (see RHBZ 1758459). > > The only known workaround is to use DNF with `best=False'. Even though > it is something you don't

Re: EPEL 7 is broken for python3 related builds

2019-10-09 Thread Nico Kadel-Garcia
On Wed, Oct 9, 2019 at 6:24 PM Miro Hrončok wrote: > > On 09. 10. 19 21:23, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote: > >> On Oct 9, 2019, at 8:03 AM, Miro Hrončok wrote: > >>> On 09. 10. 19 13:47, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote: > >>> It's going to be a while before EPEL g

Re: EPEL 7 is broken for python3 related builds

2019-10-09 Thread Nico Kadel-Garcia
> On Oct 9, 2019, at 8:03 AM, Miro Hrončok wrote: > >> On 09. 10. 19 13:47, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote: >> It's going to be a while before EPEL gets all of the "python36" >> labeled packages rebuilt to say "Provides: python3-module" as well as

Re: EPEL 7 is broken for python3 related builds

2019-10-09 Thread Nico Kadel-Garcia
On Wed, Oct 9, 2019 at 5:33 AM Miro Hrončok wrote: > > On 09. 10. 19 4:34, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote: > > On Tue, Oct 8, 2019 at 1:56 PM Irina Boverman wrote: > >> > >> Using "BuildRequires: python%{python3_pkgversion}-devel" results in this > >>

Re: EPEL 7 is broken for python3 related builds

2019-10-08 Thread Nico Kadel-Garcia
On Tue, Oct 8, 2019 at 1:56 PM Irina Boverman wrote: > > Using "BuildRequires: python%{python3_pkgversion}-devel" results in this > error: > > fedpkg scratch-build > DEBUG util.py:593: No matching package to install: 'python36-devel' A lot of Fedora .spec files use "python3-devel" and various

Re: Estimate the size of iso file based on a kickstart file

2019-09-19 Thread Nico Kadel-Garcia
On Thu, Sep 19, 2019 at 8:11 AM Kalpa Welivitigoda wrote: > > Hi all, > > Given a kickstart file (flatten) and we intend to make an iso using > it, is there a tool or service by which we can estimate the size of > the final iso (based on the packages defined in the kickstart file) > before

Re: Proposal to use repo files in Anaconda environment

2019-09-18 Thread Nico Kadel-Garcia
On Wed, Sep 18, 2019 at 4:49 AM wrote: > > Hi James, > > On Tue, 2019-09-17 at 09:57 -0400, James Cassell wrote: > > In general, I'd prefer to extend the ks repo command. > > > > My main concern is that the original-ks.cfg or anaconda-ks.cfg might > > no longer provide a complete description of

Re: Fedora 31 System-Wide Change proposal (late): No i686 Repositories

2019-09-08 Thread Nico Kadel-Garcia
On Sun, Sep 8, 2019 at 11:44 PM John M. Harris Jr. wrote: > > On Sunday, September 8, 2019 7:05:39 PM MST Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote: > > On Sun, Sep 8, 2019 at 7:00 AM vvs vvs wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > I'm sorry, but where did you saw that I said

Re: Fedora 31 System-Wide Change proposal (late): No i686 Repositories

2019-09-08 Thread Nico Kadel-Garcia
On Sun, Sep 8, 2019 at 7:00 AM vvs vvs wrote: > > I'm sorry, but where did you saw that I said something about i686 *kernel*? I > think that I explicitly mentioned *x86_64* kernel with i686 userland and > described why it could be beneficial for some users with limited memory. And a child with

Re: Fedora Workstation and disabled by default firewall

2019-09-04 Thread Nico Kadel-Garcia
On Wed, Sep 4, 2019 at 5:46 AM Nicolas Mailhot via devel wrote: > > Le 2019-09-03 18:52, Kyle Marek a écrit : > > > Additionally, binding to a specific address does not handle dynamic > > networks very well. > > Simplify that to binding to a specific address does not handle network > very well,

Re: Fedora Samba DC for what purpose it is released in Fedora ?

2019-09-03 Thread Nico Kadel-Garcia
On Tue, Sep 3, 2019 at 2:43 PM Robbie Harwood wrote: > > Nico Kadel-Garcia writes: > > > Robert Marcano wrote: > >> Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote: > >>> Alexander Bokovoy wrote: > >>>> On Mon, 02 Sep 2019, Dario Lesca wrote: > >>>&

Re: Fedora Samba DC for what purpose it is released in Fedora ?

2019-09-02 Thread Nico Kadel-Garcia
On Mon, Sep 2, 2019 at 9:25 PM Robert Marcano wrote: > > On 9/2/19 4:52 PM, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote: > > On Mon, Sep 2, 2019 at 3:33 PM Alexander Bokovoy > > wrote: > >> > >> On Mon, 02 Sep 2019, Dario Lesca wrote: > >>> Il giorno lun, 02/09/

Re: Fedora Samba DC for what purpose it is released in Fedora ?

2019-09-02 Thread Nico Kadel-Garcia
f a specific software need? > -- > / Alexander Bokovoy > Sr. Principal Software Engineer > Security / Identity Management Engineering > Red Hat Limited, Finland Sorry to chew on your employer, who are very helpful generally and whose work I normally appreciate. sssd and freeipa

Re: Fedora Samba DC for what purpose it is released in Fedora ?

2019-09-02 Thread Nico Kadel-Garcia
On Mon, Sep 2, 2019 at 1:56 PM Alessio wrote: > > On Mon, Sep 2, 2019, 5:16 PM Dario Lesca wrote: >> >> >> After few minutes almost everything work well, except for a thing ... >> all windows PC cannot access to others windows PC. > > > Wait. I'm not an expert. Said that, are we sure that the

Re: Fedora Workstation and disabled by default firewall

2019-09-01 Thread Nico Kadel-Garcia
On Sun, Sep 1, 2019 at 7:16 AM wrote: > > On Sat, Aug 31, 2019 at 6:37 PM, Nico Kadel-Garcia > wrote: > > If 30 years in DevOps and system security in both large and small > > networks count for anything, this makes *complete* sense. The > > distinction between

Re: Fedora 31 System-Wide Change proposal: Switch RPMs to zstd compression

2019-09-01 Thread Nico Kadel-Garcia
On Sun, Sep 1, 2019 at 3:52 AM Florian Weimer wrote: > > * Neal Gompa: > > > Well, technically, the correct thing to do would be for Mock to > > support downloading bootstrap images to speed up bootstrap. These > > images could be regularly produced by Fedora infrastructure and made > > available

Re: Fedora Workstation and disabled by default firewall

2019-08-31 Thread Nico Kadel-Garcia
On Sat, Aug 31, 2019 at 7:04 PM John Harris wrote: > > On Friday, August 30, 2019 5:16:25 AM MST Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote: > > > On Aug 29, 2019, at 9:41 PM, John Harris wrote: > > > > > > > > >> On Thursday, August 29, 2019 8:12:22 AM MST Dan Bo

Re: Non-responsive maintainer

2019-08-30 Thread Nico Kadel-Garcia
Jenkins in a container is begging for container churn with artifacts and logs. Jenkins *slaves* are another story, Sent from my iPhone > On Aug 29, 2019, at 9:38 PM, John Harris wrote: > >> On Thursday, August 29, 2019 11:11:43 AM MST Fabio Valentini wrote: >> On Thu, Aug 29, 2019 at 7:51 PM

Re: Fedora Workstation and disabled by default firewall

2019-08-30 Thread Nico Kadel-Garcia
> On Aug 29, 2019, at 9:41 PM, John Harris wrote: > >> On Thursday, August 29, 2019 8:12:22 AM MST Dan Book wrote: >> I would agree, but people do install multiple desktops after installing a >> spin. Such a use case needs to be considered (not sure if it matters, >> though). > > This is

Re: svnmailer orphaned

2019-08-29 Thread Nico Kadel-Garcia
> On Aug 27, 2019, at 8:01 AM, Paul Howarth wrote: > > Hi all, > > the svnmailer package has recently been orphaned and will be retired if > nobody picks it up. > > The package provides a tool to email emailed notifications of events in > subversion repositories. It is written in Python (2)

Re: [HEADS-UP]: Mercurial with Python3 on rawhide?

2019-08-29 Thread Nico Kadel-Garcia
> On Aug 26, 2019, at 7:57 AM, Neal Becker wrote: > > It is intended for both py2 and py3 packages to be parallel installed, > correct? They are supposed to be entirely distinct binary rpms, even if built from the same stone. *By convention*, the non-numbered binary is the linked to the

Re: Fedora 31 System-Wide Change proposal: Switch RPMs to zstd compression

2019-08-29 Thread Nico Kadel-Garcia
Sent from my iPhone > On Aug 29, 2019, at 12:58 PM, Kamil Dudka wrote: > >> On Tuesday, June 4, 2019 9:43:53 AM CEST Panu Matilainen wrote: >>> On 6/4/19 9:56 AM, Daniel Mach wrote: >>> >>> Dne 31. 05. 19 v 2:15 Pavel Raiskup napsal(a): >>> > On Thursday, May 30, 2019 10:38:25 AM CEST

Re: New release of Mock (fixes and subscription-manager support)

2019-08-28 Thread Nico Kadel-Garcia
On Wed, Aug 28, 2019 at 7:02 AM Miroslav Suchý wrote: > > Dne 28. 08. 19 v 4:06 Nico Kadel-Garcia napsal(a): > > i will point out, from experience with subscription manager, that > > downloading RPM's from subscription-manager is unacceptably slow > > inmost build en

Re: New release of Mock (fixes and subscription-manager support)

2019-08-28 Thread Nico Kadel-Garcia
On Wed, Aug 28, 2019 at 5:54 AM Pavel Raiskup wrote: > > On Wednesday, August 28, 2019 4:06:32 AM CEST Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote: > > i will point out, from experience with subscription manager, that > > downloading RPM's from subscription-manager is unacceptably slow > > i

Re: New release of Mock (fixes and subscription-manager support)

2019-08-27 Thread Nico Kadel-Garcia
On Tue, Aug 27, 2019 at 10:20 AM Miroslav Suchý wrote: > > Hi, > I released new version of Mock and mock-core-configs. For full release notes > see: > https://github.com/rpm-software-management/mock/wiki/Release-Notes-1.4.18 > I just submitted packages to Bodhi. > > I would like to point two

Re: Koschei branching?

2019-08-25 Thread Nico Kadel-Garcia
On Mon, Aug 26, 2019 at 12:02 AM Igor Gnatenko wrote: > > Hi Nico, > > you can check it here: https://apps.fedoraproject.org/koschei/ > > You can see Fedora Rawhide, Fedora 30, Fedora 29 and EPEL7, but there > is no Fedora 31 which kinda indicates that Koschei has not been > updated yet. Which

Re: Koschei branching?

2019-08-25 Thread Nico Kadel-Garcia
On Sun, Aug 25, 2019 at 8:33 AM Igor Gnatenko wrote: > > I see that there is no Fedora 31. Is anybody working on creating that > and moving rawhide forward to 32? I think you need to take a look at the current Fedora repositories, you'll find fedora 31 packages and find that the rawhide package

Re: Workaround for missing gpg keys in mock?

2019-08-22 Thread Nico Kadel-Garcia
On Thu, Aug 22, 2019 at 7:57 PM Christopher wrote: > > I'm trying to do `fedpkg mock` to locally build some packages, and I > keep getting errors about GPG keys not found for f31/f32 packages. How > do I work around this? Disable gpg checks in /etc/mock/whatever.cfg ?

Re: Why retire Python 2 packages and games that still work to end user ?

2019-08-14 Thread Nico Kadel-Garcia
On Wed, Aug 14, 2019 at 4:31 PM Kevin Kofler wrote: > > David Sommerseth wrote: > > Instead of spending time and resources keeping old stuff alive longer than > > needed, rather spend that energy on porting the old Python 2 over to > > Python 3. In the long run, this will result in far less work

Re: Proper way to keep service enabled when updated from sysv to systemd?

2019-08-13 Thread Nico Kadel-Garcia
On Tue, Aug 13, 2019 at 10:36 AM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > > On Tue, Aug 13, 2019 at 06:02:42PM +0800, Robin Lee wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I packaged xe-guest-utilities with a systemd service for Fedora. > > > > But there is an upstream rpm package that include the same service as > > a

Re: Why retire Python 2 packages and games that still work to end user ?

2019-08-11 Thread Nico Kadel-Garcia
On Sun, Aug 11, 2019 at 4:33 AM Miro Hrončok wrote: > > I also think that there ought to be more cooperation from the maintainers of > > individual python2-* modules. The approved Fedora 31 Change makes it way too > > easy for maintainers to just drop Python 2 support for no reason. > > When a

Re: Why retire Python 2 packages and games that still work to end user ?

2019-08-10 Thread Nico Kadel-Garcia
On Sat, Aug 10, 2019 at 7:47 PM Kevin Kofler wrote: > > Sérgio Basto wrote: > > Why we would retire childsplay or gcompris or gdesklets ? IMHO we still > > haven't a replacement . > > > > From [1] I strongly disagree with the text, why all python 2 packages > > will be removed automatically and

Re: Does anybody care about gettext?

2019-08-10 Thread Nico Kadel-Garcia
On Sat, Aug 10, 2019 at 12:48 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > On 8/10/19 4:12 AM, Björn Persson wrote: > > Rafal Luzynski wrote: > >> 9.08.2019 22:10 Jerry James wrote: > >>> Source: https://ftp.gnu.org/pub/gnu/gettext/%{name}-%{version}.tar.xz > >> > >> Do we need to change ftp to https? > > > >

Re: Xen / EC2 release criteria proposal

2019-08-09 Thread Nico Kadel-Garcia
On Fri, Aug 9, 2019 at 8:57 PM Adam Williamson wrote: > > Hey folks! I'm starting a new thread for this to trim the recipient > list a bit and include devel@ and coreos@. > > The Story So Far: there is a Fedora release criterion which requires > Fedora to boot on Xen: > > "The release must boot

Re: Dropping -devel subpackage

2019-08-04 Thread Nico Kadel-Garcia
On Sun, Aug 4, 2019 at 2:36 PM Iñaki Ucar wrote: > > On Sun, 4 Aug 2019 at 15:01, Rex Dieter wrote: > > > > Iñaki Ucar wrote: > > > > > On Sun, 4 Aug 2019 at 01:21, Miro Hrončok wrote: > > >> > > >> > So the question is: should I add "Obsoletes: pkg-devel < $new_version" > > >> > to pkg's SPEC?

Re: systemd-243-rc1

2019-08-01 Thread Nico Kadel-Garcia
On Thu, Aug 1, 2019 at 4:16 AM Fabio Valentini wrote: > So ... prerelease versions are usually tagged with an "-rc1" suffix > (or similar), which is a valid value for git tags, but RPM doesn't > allow versions to contain hyphens. > In RPM versions, prereleases can be tagged with an "~rc1" suffix

Re: some man pages have bugs, can't be grep'd

2019-07-16 Thread Nico Kadel-Garcia
On Tue, Jul 16, 2019 at 5:13 PM Chris Murphy wrote: > > I've been seeing this since clean installing Fedora 30. I don't recall > ever seeing it before, including on a Fedora 29 -> Fedora 30 upgraded > system (is now the clean installed system). > > [chris@flap ~]$ man rpm | grep -C 10

Re: nettle: heads up soname bump

2019-07-16 Thread Nico Kadel-Garcia
On Tue, Jul 16, 2019 at 5:34 AM Björn 'besser82' Esser wrote: > > Am Dienstag, den 16.07.2019, 00:20 +0200 schrieb Kevin Kofler: > > Miro Hrončok wrote: > > > gnutls now cannot be rebuilt: > > > > > > nothing provides libnettle.so.6 needed by gnutls-3.6.8- > > > 1.fc31.armv7hl > > > > Don't you

Re: Fedora 31 System-Wide Change proposal: Switch RPMs to zstd compression

2019-06-25 Thread Nico Kadel-Garcia
On Wed, Jun 19, 2019 at 9:31 AM Panu Matilainen wrote: > > On 6/19/19 1:51 PM, Aleš Matěj wrote: > > > >> At this point, the drpm library is the only blocker for zstd payloads, > >> since createrepo_c needs to be able to handle zstd drpms. > > > > I looked into the drpm library and I should be

Re: Modularity vs. libgit

2019-06-17 Thread Nico Kadel-Garcia
On Mon, Jun 17, 2019 at 5:35 AM Michael Schroeder wrote: > > On Fri, Jun 14, 2019 at 12:12:01PM -0400, Neal Gompa wrote: > > I would actually really like to see rpm's multiversioning capabilities > > extended to support this. > > I'd actually prefer to drop the multiversion mode for the kernel

Re: Modularity vs. libgit

2019-06-16 Thread Nico Kadel-Garcia
On Sun, Jun 16, 2019 at 7:15 AM Kevin Kofler wrote: > > Adam Samalik wrote: > > So, I'd like to discuss the libgit issue [1] [2] we're experiencing. With > > a help of a few people, I've put together this post to get us on common > > ground:

Re: Do people not care about broken dependencies?

2019-06-12 Thread Nico Kadel-Garcia
On Wed, Jun 12, 2019 at 3:21 AM Neal Gompa wrote: > > On Tue, Jun 11, 2019 at 11:08 PM Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote: > > > > On Mon, Jun 10, 2019 at 8:31 AM Dan Horák wrote: > > > > > > On Mon, 10 Jun 2019 11:35:52 +0200 > > > Igor Gnatenko wrote: >

Re: Do people not care about broken dependencies?

2019-06-11 Thread Nico Kadel-Garcia
On Mon, Jun 10, 2019 at 8:31 AM Dan Horák wrote: > > On Mon, 10 Jun 2019 11:35:52 +0200 > Igor Gnatenko wrote: > > > On Mon, Jun 10, 2019 at 11:31 AM Vít Ondruch > > wrote: > > > > > > There used to be sent nagging email about broken dependencies, but > > > it is not sent anymore. I last

Re: I found 2 problems on remove python2-foo packages

2019-06-05 Thread Nico Kadel-Garcia
On Tue, Jun 4, 2019 at 7:57 AM Neal Gompa wrote: > > On Tue, Jun 4, 2019 at 3:26 AM Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote: > > > > On Mon, Jun 3, 2019 at 10:51 AM Sérgio Basto wrote: > > > > > > Hi, > > > These removed python2 packages are breaking upgrade pa

Re: I found 2 problems on remove python2-foo packages

2019-06-04 Thread Nico Kadel-Garcia
On Mon, Jun 3, 2019 at 10:51 AM Sérgio Basto wrote: > > Hi, > These removed python2 packages are breaking upgrade path > > 1- when you remove python2-foo , you should add to main package > Obsoletes: python2-foo If I may suggest, *absolutely not*. "Obsoletes: python2-foo" specifically means that

Re: Inconsistent dnf provides result

2019-06-01 Thread Nico Kadel-Garcia
On Sat, Jun 1, 2019 at 4:06 PM José Abílio Matos wrote: > > On Saturday, 1 June 2019 20.29.33 WEST Georg Sauthoff wrote: > > On Sat, Jun 01, 2019 at 11:28:37AM -0700, Samuel Sieb wrote: > > > On 6/1/19 10:40 AM, Georg Sauthoff wrote: > > > > $ mkdir -p o ; rpm2cpio

Re: Replacing glibc langpacks

2019-05-27 Thread Nico Kadel-Garcia
On Mon, May 27, 2019 at 5:36 AM Florian Weimer wrote: > > I'm investigating whether it makes sense to switch to a scheme where the > glibc locale data is built from source, during package installation, > based on the langpack configuration system. This is similar to what > Debian does. May I

Re: How to submit Root CA to ship with Fedora

2019-05-21 Thread Nico Kadel-Garcia
On Mon, May 20, 2019 at 9:20 AM Stephen Gallagher wrote: > > On Mon, May 20, 2019 at 8:53 AM Danishka Navin wrote: > > Seems government is working with Chinese tech people to run mass online > > surveillance system. > > http://www.themorning.lk/china-styled-mass-online-surveillance/ > > > > > >

  1   2   3   4   5   >