[root@ossus Survey2]# sudo dnf --releasever=30
--setopt=module_platform_id=platform:f30 --enablerepo=updates-testing
distro-sync
Fedora Modular 30 - x86_64 522 kB/s | 2.4 MB
00:04
Fedora Modular 30 - x86_64 - Updates 99 B/s | 257 B
00:02
Fedora 30 - x86_64 - Test
Hi,
I maintain the hpx package and it uses std:atomic and when I install
gcc-c++ it seems that libatomic is not a dependency of the gcc-c++
package. My program fails, because it can not link against libatomic. Is
this the supposed behavior to install libatomic or should libatomic
become one of
/19 12:55 -0600, Patrick Diehl wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I maintain the hpx package, which links against boost. I would prefer to
>> build my package by myself, since we will need to update it to
>> compile/link
>> with boost 1.69. I tested it yesterday and we need
Hi,
I maintain the hpx package, which links against boost. I would prefer to
build my package by myself, since we will need to update it to compile/link
with boost 1.69. I tested it yesterday and we need to patch our last stable
release to work with boost 1.69. The patch should be available next
Hi,
my name is Patrick Diehl a staff member at the Center for Computation
and Technology (CCT) at Louisiana State University. I am a contributor
to the C++ library for parallelism and concurrency (HPX) [0].
Since we released 1.2 of HPX, I like to propose a Fedora
package [1] for HPX.
My pgp
