fedpkg says "fedora.client.bodhi has been deprecated."
Dear Packagers: I probably missed some kind of announcement, but this started happening unexpectedly: [zaitcev@lembas liberasurecode.master]$ fedpkg srpm /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/fedora/client/bodhi.py:48: DeprecationWarning: fedora.client.bodhi has been deprecated. Please use bodhi.client.bindings instead. DeprecationWarning) All the packages are up to date... or so I think (fedpkg-1.28-1.fc25.noarch, python-fedora-0.9.0-3.fc25.noarch). Is there something I need to steal from Rawhide or what? -- Pete ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: F25 builds a library with AVX, causes SIGILL on AMD
On Tue, 23 May 2017 09:30:14 +0300 Benson Muitewrote: > Will this mean that repository builds will typically have poor > performance to support portability? Yes. In extreme cases, where the difference in performance is measurable, the library may need to be modified to select a proper implementation at runtime. Ironically, liberasurecode crashed on the part that's only invoked once per data block, so obviously it's not performance critical to such a degree. In addition, I'm not sure a conversion to floating point is even necessary there. Note that in case of liberasurecode, the library itself is by definition is a switcher shim. Those that want performance specify the fastest Galois Field implementation and liberasurecode then uses -ldl. The fastsest known module for Intel CPUs is their in-house ISA-L library. -- Pete ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: F25 builds a library with AVX, causes SIGILL on AMD
On Mon, 22 May 2017 23:00:14 -0600 Pete Zaitcev <zait...@redhat.com> wrote: > As much as I can tell, there's nothing custom in CFLAGS in Makefile.am, > everything is inherited from RPM somehow. Here's how the actual line > looks like in Koji logs: Hate to reply to myself, but I'm an idiot as usual. The culprit is in configure.ac, not in Makefile.am $CC - -E -mavx /dev/null 2>&1 if [[ $? == "0" ]]; then SUPPORTED_FLAGS="$SUPPORTED_FLAGS -mavx" AC_MSG_RESULT([$CC supports -mavx]) fi I need to nail down this stuff to some generally portable subset. Sorry for the noise, -- Pete ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
F25 builds a library with AVX, causes SIGILL on AMD
Hi, All: I'm going to re-state the problem in short, but in case, URL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1454543 - I maintain a library (liberasurecode) - It contains a call to ceill() from -lm - When Koji builds the code, something makes gcc to inline AVX - The result blows up: Program received signal SIGILL, Illegal instruction. 0x7fafaf9e04bd in liberasurecode_get_aligned_data_size ( => 0x778c44bd <+61>:vxorpd %xmm0,%xmm0,%xmm0 As much as I can tell, there's nothing custom in CFLAGS in Makefile.am, everything is inherited from RPM somehow. Here's how the actual line looks like in Koji logs: libtool: compile: gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I../include -I../include/erasurecode -I../include/xor_codes -I../include/rs_vand -I../include/isa_l -I../include/shss -Werror -O2 -g -Werror -D_GNU_SOURCE=1 -Wall -pedantic -std=c99 -O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Werror=format-security -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions -fstack-protector-strong --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -grecord-gcc-switches -specs=/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/redhat-hardened-cc1 -m64 -mtune=generic -mmmx -DINTEL_MMX -msse -DINTEL_SSE -msse2 -DINTEL_SSE2 -msse3 -DINTEL_SSE3 -mssse3 -DINTEL_SSSE3 -msse4.1 -DINTEL_SSE41 -msse4.2 -DINTEL_SSE42 -mavx -DINTEL_AVX -DARCH_64 -c erasurecode.c -fPIC -DPIC -o .libs/liberasurecode_la-erasurecode.o So, what now? I have no clue where to start fixing this. Thanks in advance for any suggestions, -- Pete ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Packages FTBFS with Python 3.6
On Wed, 21 Dec 2016 00:18:47 +0100 Miro HronĨokwrote: > I've attached the list of failed packages (failed.txt). You can search python-ceilometerclient python-keystoneclient python-manilaclient python-swiftclient These are victims of python-oslo-sphinx, needs a new release: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1408503 -- P ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: check-buildroot blows up with a Go binary
On Thu, 4 Aug 2016 12:53:24 -0600 Jerry Jameswrote: > That error means that the string > "/q/zaitcev/rpms/BUILDROOT/openstack-swift-2.9.0-1.z5.x86_64" appears > in one of the files listed in %files. Grep for BUILDROOT in your > installed file tree to find the culprit(s). Jerry, thanks a lot, this was a key insight. Now all I need is to find parameters for the go compiler that preclude it from packing the debugging information into the binary. Although, now I'm curious how this differs from what C compiler does, and why the debuginfo extraction process can't deal with this binary. -- Pete -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
check-buildroot blows up with a Go binary
Hi, All: I'm trying to package something that's written in Go, and as soon as I have the compiled binary installed, the rpmbuild blows up like this: + /usr/lib/rpm/check-buildroot Binary file /q/zaitcev/rpms/BUILDROOT/openstack-swift-2.9.0-1.z5.x86_64/usr/lib/debug/usr/bin/hummingbird.debug matches Binary file /q/zaitcev/rpms/BUILDROOT/openstack-swift-2.9.0-1.z5.x86_64/usr/bin/hummingbird matches Found '/q/zaitcev/rpms/BUILDROOT/openstack-swift-2.9.0-1.z5.x86_64' in installed files; aborting error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.9NyAWC (%install) When I showed this error to people on #fedora-devel, they suspected that I managed to get the path to buildroot into %files, but it clearly is not the case. I added the installation of the binary without any changes to %files. Such build would normally break at the end in such case, when it complains about unpackaged files found. But this case is different, as above. Does anyone have any guesses about what's going on? Thanks in advance, -- Pete -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Looking for spec A producing package B
On Wed, 20 Jul 2016 18:21:30 +0200 Stanislav Ochotnickywrote: > First a working example: > http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/rpms/python-beanbag.git/tree/python-beanbag.spec > > Basically no %files section without "-n ". That means no > "main rpm" will get created. Thanks a lot, I was able to update the spec. -- Pete -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Anyone wants Pound?
Hi, guys: I stopped using Pound for myself (replaced with stunnel + HAproxy), so I was looking at shedding its maintainership. Anyone wants to take it over or should I instigate EOL? Cheers, -- Pete -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Re: Packages
On Thu, 26 Feb 2015 13:07:35 -0800 Adam Williamson adamw...@fedoraproject.org wrote: I don't need it, I'm a proven packager. MUAUAUAUAAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHA Hahaha, good one. I volunteered in pkgdb before I saw this. -- P -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Re: F22 System Wide Change: Default Local DNS Resolver
On Wed, 14 Jan 2015 06:26:49 +1030 William B will...@firstyear.id.au wrote: Right now, enabled unbound and dnssec-trigger on a laptop is an extremely difficult experience. Can you tell why you're trying that. Everyone I talk to always go unbound, unbound, unbound... WHY? Unbound is plain broken and does not work, especially with DNSSEC. But I use plain dnsmasq with NM, and everything works perfectly and fully automated by NM on my F21 laptop -- including VPN (with vpnc, no less), my internal LAN DNS, airports, office. Perhaps that's only because dnsmasq fails to participate in DNSSEC properly? Or what? Why is everyone so fixated on Unbound? -- Pete -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Re: GUI applications writing garbage to stdout/stderr
On Wed, 14 Jan 2015 11:22:57 +0100 Marcel Oliver m.oli...@jacobs-university.de wrote: Are these considered bugs that I should file against the package? Is there a policy that applies? I think you should file. I had in the past made maintainers of gvim (vim-X11) and evince take action to fix this. -- Pete -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Re: Dash as default shell
On Thu, 2 Oct 2014 14:12:12 +0100 Daniel P. Berrange berra...@redhat.com wrote: I'd be curious of the results if someone wants to take a stock Fedora 21 install and switch /bin/sh to point to dash and report if they can still boot login to GNOME. I did a smaller run on a server without GNOME. Had to chage the parts of initscripts that you have foreseen and nothing else. The unpleasant part was that iptables won't start. -- Pete -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Mongo client in Rawhide
Guys, does anyone know what's up with this (in mock_output.log): ... Start: build setup for iwhd-1.6-12.fc22.src.rpm ERROR: Exception(/var/tmp/koji/tasks/6322/7456322/local/work/cli-build/1409089719.76847.osWulSbq/iwhd-1.6-12.fc22.src.rpm) Config(f22-build-2326357-414230) 0 minutes 1 seconds INFO: Results and/or logs in: /var/lib/mock/f22-build-2326357-414230/result ERROR: Command failed: # ['/usr/bin/yum-builddep', '--installroot', '/var/lib/mock/f22-build-2326357-414230/root/', '/var/lib/mock/f22-build-2326357-414230/root///builddir/build/SRPMS/iwhd-1.6-12.fc22.src.rpm', '--setopt=tsflags=nocontexts'] Getting requirements for iwhd-1.6-12.fc22.src -- autoconf-2.69-15.fc21.noarch -- automake-1.14.1-4.fc21.noarch -- bison-3.0.2-3.fc22.x86_64 -- boost-devel-1.55.0-4.fc22.x86_64 -- boost-filesystem-1.55.0-4.fc22.x86_64 -- flex-2.5.37-8.fc22.x86_64 -- gc-devel-7.4.2-2.fc22.x86_64 -- hail-devel-0.8-0.16.gf9c5b967.fc22.x86_64 -- help2man-1.46.1-1.fc22.noarch -- jansson-devel-2.6-4.fc21.x86_64 -- libcurl-devel-7.37.1-3.fc22.x86_64 -- libmicrohttpd-devel-0.9.34-4.fc22.x86_64 -- liboauth-devel-1.0.3-3.fc22.x86_64 -- libuuid-devel-2.25-4.fc22.x86_64 -- libxml2-devel-2.9.1-5.fc22.x86_64 -- mongodb-server-2.6.3-2.fc22.x86_64 -- systemd-216-2.fc22.x86_64 Error: No Package found for mongodb-devel I didn't see any changes in Mongo announced for F22, am I missing something? -- Pete -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Re: unsigned char vs. signed char
On Tue, 15 Jul 2014 10:40:10 -0600 Orion Poplawski or...@cora.nwra.com wrote: Did you know that char defaults to signed char on x86 but unsigned char on ppc and arm? I didn't. Children these days... This variety existed since the 80s. PDP-11 was signed, IBM 370 - unsigned. -- Pete -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Re: Editing rsyslog.conf from %post
On Tue, 27 May 2014 08:27:24 -0400 Matthew Miller mat...@fedoraproject.org wrote: You could drop something into /etc/rsyslog.d/, not relying on just local0 but also the program name. See (http://wiki.rsyslog.com/index.php/Filtering_by_program_name) Thanks a lot, that's exactly the hint that I needed. Is the application's logging useful/appropriate? Maybe it should be patched to not log as much, or to only do so when a debug flag is enabled? No, it needs those logs. It's basically a webserver and a bunch of tools read the logs. -- Pete -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Editing rsyslog.conf from %post
Greetings, All: I have a bug 1083039 where basically an application logs everything to syslog making a mess out of /var/log/messages. The logging facility is configurable and the default is local0. I'm toying with an idea of doing something like this in %post sed -e s/cron.none[ \t]*\/var\/log\/messages/cron.none;local0.none\t\/var\/log\/messages/ -i- /etc/rsyslog.conf However, I have a feeling that such action is ill-advised. For example, what does happen if the package is uninstalled and some other package logs to local0? Or what if we ever move to a different package as part of JournalD etc. Does anyone have a better idea off the top of his/her head? Thanks in advance, -- Pete -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Re: default local DNS caching name server
On Thu, 10 Apr 2014 10:41:54 -0400 Chuck Anderson c...@wpi.edu wrote: [...] We need an independent, system-wide DNS cache, and always point resolv.conf to 127.0.0.1 to solve this fundamental design problem with how name resolution works on a Linux system. Windows has had a default system-wide DNS cache for over a decade. It is about time that Linux catches up. I observe you pointedly ignore the existence of nscd (which does not require any changes to resolv.conf). Why is that? -- Pete -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Desktop racing problem in F20
Dear Fedorians: Recently, I was hitting a number of odd behaviours that look like races. Filed a couple of bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1082092 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1082095 But this feels unsatisfactory, because reproducibility is extremely low for all cases. Bugs aren't going to cut it. So, I'm wondering if anyone has an idea where to dig. Here's what I recall seeing: - The audio volume applet does not always react to plugging headphones. Re-plug and it goes away. - Screensaver forgetting to blank. Move cursor and problem disappears. - Applications may not map on screen on start. Click on activity again usually fixes the problem. I think there were more, I just can't remember them all. In each instance it's easy to blame firmware, kernel, whatever. But there are several. If RAM was bad, I imagine I'd see crashes. But no, system is stable. Also, F19 worked fine. Of course it's most difficult to find a black cat in dark room when it is not in the room, so I'm wondering if I'm seeing things. If anyone else is seeing a sudden onset of racing behaviours after upgrade to F20, please let me know. -- Pete -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Re: Desktop racing problem in F20
On Fri, 28 Mar 2014 10:53:23 -0600 Stephen John Smoogen smo...@gmail.com wrote: Well I have seen all of these in the last 2 weeks on Fedora 19 so I am not sure what exactly is going on. Thanks for sharing. Perhaps some bad updates went in? If we only see the 3 areas, it may be 3 unrelated bugs. I just asked in case there are 10 races. Did you file any bugs? I'll be happy to dedup. -- Pete -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Re: Maybe it's time to get rid of tcpwrappers/tcpd?
On Thu, 20 Mar 2014 20:05:21 +0100 Lennart Poettering mzerq...@0pointer.de wrote: Well, all mails servers as well as sshd have much better ways to do such filtering. sshd has Match, The sshd's Match does not have any historic criteria (e.g. sshd does not keep a database of previous login attempts). It is not possible to import an address match from elsewhere either (where e.g. denyhosts could write it). In short, Match cannot replay fail2ban and denyhosts, as far as I can see. I think your original idea of using firewalls was better. Someone just has to implement it. Unfortunately, I'm neck-deep in cloud storage at the moment, so I'm not volunteering. -- Pete -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Re: Maybe it's time to get rid of tcpwrappers/tcpd?
On Thu, 20 Mar 2014 18:34:22 +0100 Lennart Poettering mzerq...@0pointer.de wrote: I doubt there are many people even using them anymore, firewalls are more comprehensive and a lot more powerful, and while every admin knows firewalls, I figure only very few know tcpd/tcpwrap, and even fewer ever actively make use of them... I use tcpwrappers through denyhosts, which write out /etc/hosts.deny. Then openssh-server then uses the tcpwrappers to apply the rules (AFAIK). When I investigated it, denyhosts was superior to fail2ban due to the latter doing some crazy stuff with iptables that made me uncomfortable. Also, this: Installing: fail2ban noarch 0.9-0.3.git1f1a561.fc20fedora 261 k Installing for dependencies: ed x86_64 1.10-1.fc20updates 72 k gamin-python x86_64 0.1.10-15.fc20 fedora 34 k python-inotify noarch 0.9.4-4.fc20 fedora 49 k systemd-python x86_64 208-15.fc20updates 80 k I agree that tcpwrappers should die in favour of firewalls. Folks working on fail2ban are already considering integration with firewalld, which seems like a great idea. Too bad fail2ban is just as crusty as tcpwrappers. If we only had denyhosts that executed firewall-cmd... -- Pete -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Protection from merge commits
Dear All: I found that I pushed a merge node into Fedora git (fortunately it was only on f19 branch, not in Rawhide): commit 51eec48c20ba57054f17ba29f23e6a0aa36df9a4 Merge: ac36771 f9213a5 Author: Pete Zaitcev zait...@kotori.zaitcev.us Date: Wed Aug 7 12:14:15 2013 -0600 Merge branch 'f19' of ssh://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/openstack-swift into f19 Thought I was careful about them, but apparently not enough. So, does anyone have a script that can be attached to git hooks, reliably detects an attempt to push merge nodes, then bails the push? Thanks, -- Pete -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Re: Why is AHCI built-in?
On Mon, 19 Aug 2013 13:16:03 -0500 Ian Pilcher arequip...@gmail.com wrote: (I want to rebuild it with LED triggers for the disk LEDs on my NAS.) Frankly this sounds like madness. You need to build a kernel, it's trivial -- just edit one of configs and rpmbuild -ba, and then you have very clear delineation of what upgrades what and what depends on what. -- Pete -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Re: Question about what to do if mantainer is absent
On Tue, 14 May 2013 20:03:41 -0500 Michael Catanzaro mike.catanz...@gmail.com wrote: Well the open model has already been tried and proven in openSUSE, and they're still using it because it actually works really well. There aren't usually any issues regarding overlap of work, though admittedly that community is a smaller than Fedora's. It's hard to get away with scp /home/*/.ssh/id_rsa evilhost because every change is always reviewed by a small group of maintainers responsible for a collection of packages. How do they deal with a conflict? Imagine someone there splitting texlive into 2500 subpackages and then 100 angry contributors reverting it. What are they going to do in their open model then? -- Pete -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Do you think this is a security risk and if not is it a bad UI decision?
On Wed, 08 May 2013 10:09:13 +0200 Pierre-Yves Chibon pin...@pingoured.fr wrote: On Wed, 2013-05-08 at 10:10 +0200, Olav Vitters wrote: On Fri, May 03, 2013 at 09:03:02PM -0700, Dan Mashal wrote: Let's be realistic here. The precedence they have recently set is they make decisions and if you don't like it too bad. Even if that is true, what is your point? That you are replying to a 4 days old email on a thread that is no longer active? FOUR DAYS is no longer active for you? Seriously? You want to STFU those who disagree _this hard_? -- Pete -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Do you think this is a security risk and if not is it a bad UI decision?
On Sat, 4 May 2013 05:32:18 +0100 Matthew Garrett mj...@srcf.ucam.org wrote: I strongly disagree. The policy implication of this violation of tradition and expectation goes beyond Anaconda. If you want to change a decision, it helps if you're discussing it in a forum that's read by the people who made that decision. This is a perfectly appropriate forum where their authority for making this decision is to be discussed before it's revoked if necessary. -- Pete -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: NetworkManager: do not tend missing hardware
On Thu, 25 Apr 2013 10:28:56 -0700 John Reiser jrei...@bitwagon.com wrote: $ dmesg Apr 25 05:56:36 localhost NetworkManager[614]: info modem-manager is now available Yeah, modem manager is irksome, although in my case it only wastes 2.3 MB. Did you try to file something like make NM load helpers only as needed? Dan is usually quite responsive. At worst he'll explain in Bugzilla why NM does it this way. Bluetooth is generally attached through USB, BTW. NM could know if BT adapter is on or not, even get events when it comes online (by flipping hardware switch). -- Pete -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Keystone on Rawhide tracebacks around sqlalchemy
Greetings: When I try to run Keystone, it blows up with this: File /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/migrate/versioning/schema.py, line 10, in module from sqlalchemy import exceptions as sa_exceptions ImportError: cannot import name exceptions python-sqlalchemy-0.8.0-0.1.b1.fc19.x86_64 openstack-keystone-2013.1-0.2.g2.fc19.noarch Weird thing is, I'm not trying to migrate anything anywhere. Just launching a new Keystone with keystone-manage db_sync. Does it work for anyone else? Thanks, -- Pete -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Proposed F19 Feature: Ryu - Network Operating System
On Thu, 24 Jan 2013 12:20:01 +0900 Isaku Yamahata yamah...@valinux.co.jp wrote: I suppose you're talking about the difference from plain Open vSwitch plugin. Plain OVS plugin doesn't use OpenFlow controller. So it's rather static and utilizes small subset of OVS. For example, it doesn't react to network usage dynamically. Thanks a lot, that explains it. -- Pete -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Proposed F19 Feature: Ryu - Network Operating System
On Wed, 23 Jan 2013 15:25:53 + Jaroslav Reznik jrez...@redhat.com wrote: Currently, Ryu manages network devices by using OpenFlow. You can say that Ryu is an OpenFlow Controller. I'm just curious about something. Not saying if we need or do not need Ryu in Fedora, I notice that Ryu attempts to insert itself between OpenStack and OpenVSwitch (or actually anything that implements OpenFlow). What's the purpose of adding the layer, and how is it different from what Quantum is doing now? There has to be some kind of specific benefit. -- Pete -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Update mongodb to 2.2.0 (latest release)
On Tue, 09 Oct 2012 09:52:04 -0500 Troy Dawson tdaw...@redhat.com wrote: I'm pretty sure at the very least we need to update the various mongo drivers (rubygem-mongo, pymongo, etc..) Well, I suppose can rebuild iwhd in F17 and bump Requires: mongo = 2.2. Not ideal in a stable release, but it you think it's ok... I see Nate is AWOL in this thread suspiciously. -- Pete -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Package with no upstream (ftp)
On Wed, 18 Jul 2012 10:55:55 -0400 David Cantrell dcantr...@redhat.com wrote: Or forget the netkit source. I'd like to see ftp(1) replaced with the NetBSD ftp client: ftp://ftp.netbsd.org/pub/NetBSD/misc/tnftp/ But we already have a yet nicer FTP client, lftp. Really not point in tinkering with the plain FTP this way, it seems to me. -- Pete -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] Retiring packages for Fedora 18
On Fri, 6 Jul 2012 16:55:19 -0400 Bill Nottingham nott...@redhat.com wrote: Package Pound (orphan) I'm taking Pound in the interests of Swift, while we're figuring out what the standard reverse proxy in Fedora is. -- P -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: GitHub is a terrible upstream
On Mon, 23 Apr 2012 14:08:05 -0600 Orion Poplawski or...@cora.nwra.com wrote: %global commit bd245c9 Source0: https://github.com/jukka/pcfi/tarball/%{commit}/jukka-pcfi-%{commit}.tar.gz %setup -q -n jukka-pcfi-%{commit} I do not understand how this is supposed to work in the face of yum update. Suppose I cut a package last year: swift3-1.0.0-878c23.tag.xz Then I build an RPM: openstack-swift-plugin-swift3-1.0.0-878c23-1.fc17.noarch.rpm Today I run the same git-archve and get: swift3-1.0.0-5c74ba.tag.xz openstack-swift-plugin-swift3-1.0.0-5c74ba-1.fc18.noarch.rpm Great, how do I update from the old one to the new one? Please do not suggest epoch. -- Pete -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
python-webob 1.1 vs 1.2
Guys, I noticed that we started building Webob 1.1 in F17. However, I had some issues with 1.1, namely they deprecated a bunch of attributes by throwing warnings. This causes unit tests to fail and ironically the way 1.2 completely disables them with None is much easier to detect, so that code supporting both 1.0 and 1.2 may be written. Code supporting 1.0 and 1.1 is much more difficult. So, do you think we could just jump over 1.1 and go to 1.2 betas instead? Alternatively, I'd love some advice on how to deal with 1.1. -- Pete -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: ARM as a primary architecture
On Fri, 23 Mar 2012 04:46:23 +0100 Kevin Kofler kevin.kof...@chello.at wrote: My desktop is actually older and slower than my notebook. Yet I use the desktop whenever I'm at home. The form factor is just more convenient. That's just what you personally prefer. I quit using desktops back in 2001, because laptop form factor is just more convenient for me. Let's not mistake personal perceptions for the whole picture. -- Pete -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: ARM as a primary architecture
On Thu, 22 Mar 2012 14:01:27 -0400 DJ Delorie d...@redhat.com wrote: Buy a trimslice and run it with iSCSI. This is not good enough for me to become involved with Fedora on ARM. Glad it works for you, but I need a real system, like a Netwinder. -- Pete -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: ARM as a primary architecture
On Fri, 23 Mar 2012 22:02:37 + Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com wrote: It unfortunately shed no light on the ARM topic, because, well, there's ARM SoCs in all those form factors. Except the x86-64 high performance single threaded class :-) Rich, check this out - http://summit.openstack.org/sessions/view/40 -- P -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: ARM as a primary architecture
On Fri, 23 Mar 2012 22:05:39 + Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com wrote: Trimslice has options of SSD or HDD as well so it would be no less of a real machine like a netwinder. http://trimslice.com/web/models So I see, thanks. DJ's original suggestion was too forceful in insisting on iSCSI. I also received a word from colleague in town that he's going to tinker with Trimslice Pro. -- Pete -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: ARM as a primary architecture
On Tue, 20 Mar 2012 11:52:29 -0400 Peter Jones pjo...@redhat.com wrote: 6) supported platforms must be fully integrated into building and installation. Apropos that, what are the supported platforms right now? From what I know about the Fedora on ARM, they use a rather scary looking pile of development boards with very poor I/O. I'd like to know if you can make a suggestion like if you want to hack on Fedora on ARM, buy Dell XXX or Archos YYY, and then we're all more or less on the same page for next 2 years at least. Or it doesn't work like that in the ARM world? -- Pete -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Notice: IPv6 breaking issues tentatively considered blocker for F17
On Sat, 10 Mar 2012 07:46:56 -0600 Chris Adams cmad...@hiwaay.net wrote: DHCPv6 is not the only way to configure dynamic IPv6; my home network is using SLAAC. IMHO that will probably be more common in home and other small networks. This may be the case for the network that you or I run, but not for providers. Comcast require DHCPv6 (otherwise they can't delegate /64 automatically). -- Pete -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Notice: IPv6 breaking issues tentatively considered blocker for F17
On Mon, 12 Mar 2012 13:08:24 -0500 Dan Williams d...@redhat.com wrote: Comcast require DHCPv6 (otherwise they can't delegate /64 automatically). Do they send RAs at all? If so, which (if either) of the other and managed flags are set? If they don't, do they just expect DHCPv6 to be magically run, and what gets used for the default gateway address given that DHCPv6 has no such option? I'd love to know... I promise to let you know once I can run rdisc6 eth0.2. -- Pete -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Automating the NonResponsiveMaintainers policy
On Fri, 02 Mar 2012 12:09:21 +0100 Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net wrote: if you are working the whole month on a different component and give no single feedback to a new reported bug you are ending in frustrated submitters - if they get a assigned they do not feel ignored This is going to end in counter-automation, with a script that uploads I'm busy, this bug is not to be used as an excuse to initiate punitive automation comment every 6 days. -- Pete -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Some fedora projects are still not using transifex (properly)
On Tue, 21 Feb 2012 10:20:32 +0100 Alan Pevec ape...@gmail.com wrote: Semi-related question: what's the procedure to get new language team approved on transifex? BTW, Aeolus Image Warehouse had to dump Transifex. It was impossible to build anything without having an account there, and that was unacceptable, if we ever wanted contributions. -- Pete -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: F17 heads up: gnome-shell for everyone!
On Fri, 04 Nov 2011 18:23:02 +0100 Kevin Kofler kevin.kof...@chello.at wrote: If I filed every bug in the distro in upstream I'd have a dozen different bugzilla accounts by now. So what? Maintainers are not messengers, they have other work to do than forwarding the bugs you're too lazy to file directly at the right place. IMHO you are very, very wrong about this. A maintainer is fully responsible for the product he is delivering into the hands of users. Sending them to file bugs upstream means not doing maintainer's job. Aside from the abdication of responsibility, there are a few technical problems with the idea as well. The need for a given user to allocate accounts and the resulting chilling effect is one downside, as already mentioned. The bug is not going anywhere if you make it harder for the user to file! Also, upstream often refuses to deal with distro bugs, and may ask to rebuild from the source or to use upstream-built releases. -- Pete -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Anaconda memory requirements
On Sat, 20 Aug 2011 11:31:55 -0700 John Reiser jrei...@bitwagon.com wrote: How much memory will anaconda require to install Fedora 16? Anaconda requires 768MB, and more (=1GB) if there is no swap partition. It is not just Anaconda. F15 GA kernel would not even uncompress initramfs on anything below 1GB. On VM hosts, I modify the VMs with virsh to have 1GB, then scale them down after installation. This is getting difficult to manage, I have to say. My almost brand new Red Hat corporate T400 only has 2GB, and I have a stack of almost good enough boxes. In the past we always felt free to push obsolete hardware over to BSD. Remember NPTL? CMOV? But now I have a feeling that we may be outstripping the speed of improvement in common hardware. Or maybe I need a better computer. I'm wondering what everyone's feeling is about it. I saw a tweet (by Mairin, I think) the 12GB is a life-changing experience. Well, if that's our new standard platform, then sure, no sense to optimize for 1GB. -- Pete -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: F15's /usr/include/rpc has disappeared; netdb.h uncompilable
On Sat, 7 May 2011 16:00:36 +0100 Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com wrote: * The RPC implementation in libc is obsoleted. Old programs keep working but new programs cannot be linked with the routines in libc anymore. Programs in need of RPC functionality must be linked against TI-RPC. The TI-RPC implemtation is IPv6 enabled and there are other benefits. The question is: what is TI-RPC and where one finds it? Is it even packaged in Fedora? ... and what about programs that just use XDR? That actually was my question, because I'm responsible for Hail and its subpackages (CLD protocol uses XDR encoding). -- Pete -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: F15's /usr/include/rpc has disappeared; netdb.h uncompilable
On Thu, 05 May 2011 15:39:21 +0200 Jim Meyering j...@meyering.net wrote: Reported as http://bugzilla.redhat.com/702366 and http://bugzilla.redhat.com/702354 Well, here's NEWS: * The RPC implementation in libc is obsoleted. Old programs keep working but new programs cannot be linked with the routines in libc anymore. Programs in need of RPC functionality must be linked against TI-RPC. The TI-RPC implemtation is IPv6 enabled and there are other benefits. Visible changes of this change include (obviously) the inability to link programs using RPC functions without referencing the TI-RPC library, the removal of the RPC headers from the glibc headers, and the lack of symbols defined in rpc/netdb.h when netdb.h is installed. Implemented by Ulrich Drepper. The question is: what is TI-RPC and where one finds it? Is it even packaged in Fedora? -- Pete -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: tomboy orphaned
On Thu, 28 Apr 2011 14:08:05 +0800 Steven Yong woong...@gmail.com wrote: On Apr 27, 2011 11:30 PM, Ray Strode halfl...@gmail.com wrote: I use it everyday and I am a C/C++ programmer. What is the requirement for the role? Just use Gnote. It being in C++ you can even maintain it for Fedora. -- Pete -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Firefox 4 for f14?
On Wed, 23 Mar 2011 20:36:33 -0400 Genes MailLists li...@sapience.com wrote: On 03/23/2011 07:58 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote: Jochen Schmitt wrote: If you want to get firefox4 on Fedora 14 now, the only way is to use the private firefox4 repository on Or you can simply download it direct from mozilla.org and install it in /usr/local/ Mozilla's own build is garbage: Input Method does not work, fonts all screwed up. Spot's is much better and is actually usable. -- Pete -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: debugfs query
On Fri, 28 Jan 2011 11:19:22 -0500 Kyle McMartin k...@mcmartin.ca wrote: On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 10:36:20AM +, Steven Whitehouse wrote: Currently Fedora doesn't automatically mount debugfs at boot time. So I thought that it might be worth asking whether this should be the case? systemd seems to, so I guess it will be mounted by default in F-15. What is it in debugfs that SystemD needs? -- Pete -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Shrinking terminals in rawhide
Apropos terminals, did you have a chance to stop them spewing an error message on every keypress/release? Or am I a freak of nature to even read ~/.xsession-errors in the first place? -- Pete -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: How to filter posts on planet.fedoraproject.org?
On Sun, 16 Jan 2011 16:10:59 +0300 Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) fo...@hubbitus.com.ru wrote: But I'm wondering how I can filter records which I read via RSS by language!? Planet was insufferable like this for years now. I gave up some time in 2006 and simply subscribed in Liferea to feeds themselves. You just need revisit it once a year or so and check if any interesting feeds were added. -- Pete -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Local system security
On Wed, 05 Jan 2011 16:13:25 -0500 Adam Jackson a...@redhat.com wrote: But prevention of DoS on the part of local actors is just not a game you can win. If nothing else, remember that the way Linux implements malloc() assumes you have infinite memory, which means you overcommit resources, which means failure happens. As long as we say things like the first one, Oracle will continue to pretend that Solaris is somehow more suitable to deploy Sunray... As for the second one, look here (we ship with overcommit set to heuristic, which is Webkit crashes in Rawhide): https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=648319#c63 -- Pete -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Introducing wicked
On Fri, 26 Nov 2010 10:24:34 +0100 Olaf Kirch o...@suse.de wrote: 3. Why not NetworkManager? On the other hand, there's NetworkManager (and I'm getting to this point because Pete Zaitcev brought this up). Right now, NetworkManager doesn't handle bridges, bonds, infiniband, token ring - that's why I say it's a bit desktopish, the server environment simply has never been the focus of NetworkManager's development. Also, it links against a somewhat longish lists of fairly heavy-weight libraries (including nspr), and requires dbus - all of which make it pretty much impossible to use in initrd or an environment where space is a premium. Thanks, I see. Not sure I agree entirely though, but duly noted. -- Pete -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Introducing wicked
On Thu, 25 Nov 2010 20:29:30 + Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com wrote: On Thu, Nov 25, 2010 at 05:24:37PM +0100, Olaf Kirch wrote: You may ask, don't we have enough of those already? Don't we have NetworkManager, connman, netcf, and a few more? Indeed ... You don't explain how it's better than netcf. Or NM for that matter. There is nothing desktop-oriented about NM beyond the history when it was introduced to solve issues that originated on desktop. But its technical design is no different from what you are offering. Thus the case for replacement is not made. -- Pete -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: fedora mission (was Re: systemd and changes)
On Fri, 27 Aug 2010 17:54:37 -0400 Matthias Clasen mcla...@redhat.com wrote: Your attack is misguided, Jon. It is very much our responsibility to inform users that the software they install or use is no longer actively supported. Inform, sure. But Kevin proposed an installer that would just refuse to install. Jon had every right to be outraged, IMHO. -- Pete -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: usb_modeswitch by default
On Fri, 05 Mar 2010 22:27:48 -0800 Dan Williams d...@redhat.com wrote: I have taken over the maintainership from Robert, and the new usb_modeswitch rpms are in rawhide now. And F-13? I'm pushing for F13 and F12 at least :) I usually end up getting the bugs when modems don't switch, I just never had the time to give usb_modeswitch any love. One last thing: Dan, is it your page at this URL: http://live.gnome.org/NetworkManager/MobileBroadband It says: Huawei Most Huawei devices are handled automatically by the kernel. If the 'option' driver which handles Huawei devices lacks the USB IDs of your device, the correct solution is to add those IDs to the kernel driver by submitting a patch to your distribution's bugzilla or Linux Kernel Mailing List. If your device is not yet recognized, you can eject the fake driver CD with usb_modeswitch, and bind the generic usbserial driver manually to the device (see below). Someone filed a bug about this today: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=571542 -- Pete -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: usb_modeswitch by default
On Thu, 04 Mar 2010 01:50:21 +0530 Rahul Sundaram methe...@gmail.com wrote: (adding linux-usb to cc:, see below) Increasingly a number of broadband connections require usb_modeswitch to connect online http://who-t.blogspot.com/2010/03/vodafone-australia-mobile-broadband-and.html Any opposition to adding this to the base group? I am strongly opposed. IMHO, using usb_modeswitch is not necessary, and we should not package its version 1.0.0 or any other version. The root of the problem here is that someone thought it was a good idea to make the kernel chase Huawei IDs. But it's not. Even if the linux-next were taking the IDs as Huawei pops them, without any lag, the distro kernels simply have no chance to keep up. Here is the log from Peter's blog: usb 1-2: new high speed USB device using ehci_hcd and address 6 usb 1-2: New USB device found, idVendor=12d1, idProduct=1520 usb 1-2: New USB device strings: Mfr=3, Product=2, SerialNumber=0 usb 1-2: Product: HUAWEI Mobile usb 1-2: Manufacturer: HUAWEI Technology So, the 0x1520. The 2.6.33 ends with 0x143f. No woder Peter resorts to usb_modeswitch! And what's the downside for him? My ulcers? We ought to put a quirk in usb-storage that deals with Huawei in a particular way. I don't see how screenfuls of garbage in unusual_devs.h is any better than special-casing in usb_stor_acquire_resources. If we do not do that, users will continue using usb_modeswitch, and then all the kernel code that deals with Huawei now amounts to useless waste. -- Pete -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: usb_modeswitch by default
On Thu, 04 Mar 2010 09:00:12 -0800 Dan Williams d...@redhat.com wrote: The problem is that there are a ton more devices that need modeswitching than just Huawei, and upstream USB developers are refusing to take patches that add more devices to the kernel modeswitching code because they assert it should be done in userspace. Thus, usb_modeswitch is the only thing that can handle *all* modems that need modeswitching these days. Honestly we should just stop adding new Huawei IDs to unusual_devs, and just use usb_modeswitch. Who are these mysterious kernel developers? You don't happen to have any e-mail saved? If Greg Kroah rules that we should promote usb_modeswitch, then fine, let's do that, and drop all Huawei nonsense from kernel. But I haven't heard anything like that so far. In fact, the party line was exactly the opposite: eradicate usb_modeswitch. -- Pete -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: usb_modeswitch by default
On Thu, 4 Mar 2010 12:46:35 -0800 Matthew Dharm mdharm-...@one-eyed-alien.net wrote: The problem is that there are a ton more devices that need modeswitching than just Huawei, and upstream USB developers are refusing to take patches that add more devices to the kernel modeswitching code because they assert it should be done in userspace. [] Who are these mysterious kernel developers? You don't happen to have any e-mail saved? I'm one of those developers. We've hashed this out before. I'm pretty sure Greg's with me on this one. If the device can be handled in userspace, then it should be. If it's storage emulation mode is not good enough to handle in userspace, then a kernel update will have to be done. OK, that sounds good. So, I withdraw objections after Rahul's question, as far as Fedora is concerned. On the kernel side, should we discard all the cruft un unusual_devs.h? -- Pete -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel