Orion Poplawski or...@cora.nwra.com writes:
On 02/24/2015 05:22 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
Orion Poplawski wrote:
Getting:
/builddir/build/BUILD/mrpt-1.0.2/libs/base/include/mrpt/utils/mrpt_macros.h:296:150:
error: no match for 'operator' (operand types are
'std::basic_ostreamchar' and
Josh Boyer jwbo...@fedoraproject.org writes:
We should not include preprocessed source files by default without the user
knowing and agreeing. People use gcc to build proprietary source still.
There's a check box to this effect in ABRT. It's not much different
from sending backtraces or some
Parag Nemade panem...@gmail.com writes:
I actually got more confused when pmachata built harfbuzz without
giving specific information in the changelog.
The reason was that I was rebuilding both Boots and ICU deps, and since
I just took a list of conflicts en blocks (as explained in another
Mikolaj Izdebski mizde...@redhat.com writes:
I don't know why 0.9.38-3 was built, it looks like unnecessary build.
Yes, it is.
About 30 packages diverged after f22-boost side-tag had been created.
It's impractical to check by hand whether any happened to be already
rebuilt in the short window
Hi,
Most of the mass rebuild finished last week already, but due to FOSDEM
and other circumstances (like me leaving the result file on my home NFS
out of reach yesterday) I'm only getting to writing this now. A bunch
of Boost-related bugs have been already resolved, or I contacted the
Dodji Seketeli do...@seketeli.org writes:
but the link just points to the package. While it's not necessarily
difficult to use, I wouldn't quite call it intuitive either.
Indeed. And while we are in the Shameless Plug department, I'd like
to mention the presence of a new tool called
commit 71b6739cd7e4f2863289ba4993ff2e25a68d17d1
Author: Petr Machata pmach...@redhat.com
Date: Mon Jan 26 21:17:28 2015 +0100
Rebuild for boost 1.57.0
slic3r.spec |5 -
1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/slic3r.spec b/slic3r.spec
index 6f99957
Petr Machata pmach...@redhat.com writes:
I'll rebase TBB to 4.3u2 next week.
This is now done in Rawhide. The F21 update is here:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/tbb-4.3-1.20141204.fc21
Thanks,
Petr
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https
Dodji Seketeli do...@seketeli.org writes:
Petr Machata pmach...@redhat.com a écrit:
The soname didn't change. I reviewed the actual changes using abidiff,
and the only thing reported that I think is an actual ABI violation is
insertion of one virtual method. I don't think that's real
The packages with MPICH enabled are here:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=8678117
http://ppc.koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2283793
http://s390.koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1706653
http://arm.koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2852781
Your favorite time of the year, and mine as well, is here!
The plan is to do the rebase next week, maybe on the weekend already.
As usual, I'll request a side tag, build boost, and then work through
the dependent packages. I'll wrap the work on Thursday at the latest
regardless on what state it
Marcin Juszkiewicz mjuszkiew...@redhat.com writes:
W dniu 19.01.2015 o 20:58, Petr Machata pisze:
I'll rebase TBB to 4.3u2 next week. A scratch build is here:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=8665932
Can you do builds on secondary architectures as well? arm-koji
Hello,
I'll rebase TBB to 4.3u2 next week. A scratch build is here:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=8665932
Client packages are as follows, their owners are CC'd.
adobe-source-libraries-0:1.0.43-23.fc22.src
freecad-0:0.14-5.fc22.src
Colin Walters walt...@verbum.org writes:
On Tue, Jul 1, 2014, at 12:53 PM, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
Yes, soname bumps are nonevents with OBS, since everything is
automatically rebuilt. Sounds like Koschei is a big step towards that.
I've always found it really strange how so many people
Hi there,
the rebuilds are mostly over, thanks for everyone who chimed in. Some
packages may have been double-rebuilt, as there was no synchronization
between the partakers.
Maybe next year I'll publish the list of packages on a wiki, organized
by dependencies, so that people at least know in
Hello,
boost-1.55.0 has been built in a side-tag f21-boost. I'll be rebuilding
Boost clients over the next couple days--first those that depend on
Boost DSO's, then possibly the rest. Anyone wanting to join the party
should feel free. This is the incantation to use to build in the side
tag:
$
Ralf Corsepius rc040...@freenet.de writes:
However, I recall another case, deps on dirs often don't work:
(massively) parallel make.
Did you try to build the package single-threaded (make -j1)?
No, it used -j2 (as bug 885474 suggests).
PM.
--
devel mailing list
Ralf Corsepius rc040...@freenet.de writes:
I guess, no. AFAIS, this makefile carries deps on directories.
This is a very old known general limitation of and portability isse
with make and one of known donts.
Deps on dirs work on local Linux file systems, but doesn't work on
linux nfs and
Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com writes:
Maybe we need to put a mass rebuild starts point in the Schedule in
the future so that people are more aware of this and have the sorts of
features like a perl rebase done in reasonable time.
That would be useful.
Thanks,
PM
--
devel mailing list
Ahmad Samir ahmadsamir3...@gmail.com writes:
$ yum list boost-static*
[...]
Available Packages
boost-static.i686
1.53.0-6.fc19fedora
boost-static.x86_64
1.53.0-8.fc19updates
it looks like
punto...@libero.it punto...@libero.it writes:
there is also zookeeper... to be rebuild with the new boost?
Yeah, I only got around to rebuilding those that directly depend on
Boost DSO's. I guess I can order builds of the rest of the dependencies
today, though originally my plan was to go
More failures from another bunch of rebuilds of about 100 packages that
have API-only dependence on Boost. I fixed those overtly Boost-related,
what remains seems to fail due to something else, so it should be OK to
just fix these in Rawhide and ignore Boost.
Note that f20-boost will be merged
Hi there,
as some of you may have noticed, the biannual Boost rebuild has been
underway since Saturday! So far about 100 packages have been rebuilt.
I'll appreciate any help that I can get with resolving the current
failures. Just ping me on IRC (_petr) so that we don't duplicate
effort.
Petr Machata pmach...@redhat.com writes:
as some of you may have noticed, the biannual Boost rebuild has been
underway since Saturday! [...] I'll appreciate any help that I can
get with resolving the current failures.
I forgot to mention that if you wish to build Boost clients, you should
Ville Skyttä ville.sky...@iki.fi writes:
These are now fixed in master.
Thanks!
PM
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
punto...@libero.it punto...@libero.it writes:
Il 29/07/2013 18:01, Petr Machata ha scritto:
bookkeeper 5663346 Package: xbean-3.13-2.fc20.noarch (build)
Requires: eclipse-equinox-osgi
sorry, i rebuilt without boost 1.54.x support...
eclipse-equinox-osgi is available also in arm
Dan Mashal dan.mas...@gmail.com writes:
The Feature page still belongs to the FeaturePageIncomplete category.
I feel a somewhat similar way about boost and it would be nice if
there was some more detailed descriptions here.
Frankly, my biannual filing of Feature/Change page is mostly
Petr Machata pmach...@redhat.com writes:
Dan Mashal dan.mas...@gmail.com writes:
The Feature page still belongs to the FeaturePageIncomplete category.
I feel a somewhat similar way about boost and it would be nice if
there was some more detailed descriptions here.
So if the consensus
Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com writes:
Is the installed libSDL.so symlink a mistage in the SDL-devel package?
Is renaming libSDL.so to libSDL-1.2.so wise? The libSDL.so is used in
upstream and other distributions.
I'm speculating here, but renaming the actual DSO like this would make
it
Richard Shaw hobbes1...@gmail.com writes:
I initially got abi-compliance-checker into Fedora because one of my
packages does not maintain any sort of API/ABI compatibility or even
versioning for that matter. That way I could always check a new
release to see if any of its dependencies needed
Summary of changes:
a4b73be... Rebuild for TBB memory barrier bug (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
This was long overdue, last update was almost a year ago. That said,
the update should be safe: upstream-tracker.org lists only one warning
that is potentially ABI-breaking, which is that the constant eid_max
changed value. That constant doesn't appear to be used by any of the
clients. Soname
Dan Horák d...@danny.cz writes:
Josh Stone píše v Út 05. 03. 2013 v 09:44 -0800:
Is that feasible for C++ APIs? I mean, it might be possible if you're
*really* careful about hiding class changes, but this project is not
structured that way.
it is, see eg. the wxWidgets library, they are
Kevin Fenzi ke...@scrye.com writes:
On Fri, 08 Feb 2013 02:57:19 +0100
Petr Machata pmach...@redhat.com wrote:
Hi there,
I have just built boost 1.53. I didn't go through the side tag as
originally envisioned, as tomorrow's mass rebuild should take care of
it all in one fell swoop
Kevin Fenzi ke...@scrye.com writes:
I know the last cycle the boost tag was merged back in and there were a
lot of packages that still needed rebuilding. For this cycle, do you
have any provenpackagers in your feature owners that could just make
sure all the packages are rebuilt? It would be
Hi there,
as every release, we (the Boost maintainers) intend to rebase Boost for
Fedora 19. The targeted release is 1.53.0. The plan is outlined on the
feature page [1].
Boost 1.53 is not out yet (it will be on February 4). Beta is out, but
I don't think it's a good idea to rebase to that.
Hi there,
if you had problems with linking or detection of Boost.Thread due to a
message that looks similar to this:
/usr/bin/ld: /tmp/ccAv0B8G.o: undefined reference to symbol
'_ZN5boost6system15system_categoryEv'
/usr/bin/ld: note: '_ZN5boost6system15system_categoryEv' is defined in DSO
David Malcolm dmalc...@redhat.com writes:
On Tue, 2012-08-07 at 01:22 +0200, Petr Machata wrote:
Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com writes:
On Mon, Aug 6, 2012 at 11:33 AM, David Malcolm dmalc...@redhat.com wrote:
(c) move the boost-1.50 from f18-boost into f18 proper
My understanding
Petr Machata pmach...@redhat.com writes:
look at re-enabling Python 3 this week, but I'm thinking that I'll
actually build it only after the merge.
Python 3 support is in git. I'll spin a build after the merge is done.
Thanks,
PM
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https
David Malcolm dmalc...@redhat.com writes:
On Sat, 2012-08-04 at 21:30 +0530, Parag N(पराग़) wrote:
Thanks. But I am getting this error for xs package scratch build.
DEBUG util.py:257: -- gc-devel-7.2c-3.fc18.x86_64
DEBUG util.py:257: -- readline-devel-6.2-5.fc18.x86_64
DEBUG
Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com writes:
I rebuilt my boost users into f18-boost, and now I'm getting rawhide
broken dep warnings for one that needs a rebuild for libGLEW. The
boost rebuild in f18-boost has the new libGLEW. I'm assuming I can
just let it sit until f18-boost is tagged into
doesn't like the new boost. We'll figure out
how to work around the notorious API changes. (Or fix boost.)
Thank you,
Petr Machata
Related:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/F18Boost150
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=825826
https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/5230
--
devel
Michael Schwendt mschwe...@gmail.com writes:
21 link with flex libs-- flex doesn't change often, though
I believe that libfl.a hasn't really changed in Fedora at all. It
exports two symbols, totaling something like 10 lines of actual code.
Absence of client rebuilds is just not a
Hi there,
we (the Boost maintainers) intend to bump boost to a more recent version
in course of Fedora 18 development. Though no schedule is available for
Boost or Fedora as of yet, it seems like we are aiming for 1.50 and
there should be a couple months of overlap. We intend to make this a
Ralf Ertzinger fed...@camperquake.de writes:
Hi.
On Sun, 19 Feb 2012 22:26:20 +0100, Petr Machata wrote
Please don't do this.
The main reason being that header code from bundled boost is in
general not binary compatible with the native code from system
boost. It might maybe happen
Alec Leamas leamas.a...@gmail.com writes:
I've tried to package Adobe Source Libraries, (BZ:790628). Once again,
I'm running into bundling issues.. The situation is basically that ASL
build system expects a boost source tree to be available. This is not
just to include and link, it's for the
Richard Shaw hobbes1...@gmail.com writes:
On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 8:18 AM, Rex Dieter rdie...@math.unl.edu wrote:
Richard Shaw wrote:
I've gone through the CMakeLists.txt and added add_dependencies(...
but I think that's redundant because target_link_libraries is getting
set properly.
I'm
Julian Sikorski beleg...@gmail.com writes:
I was trying to build mame (an rpmfusion package) with gcc-4.7. I have
managed to get it to build, but it fails at the linking stage:
obj/sdl/libocore.a(sdlsocket.o): In function `operator new(unsigned long)':
Orion Poplawski or...@cora.nwra.com writes:
On 12/05/2011 05:29 PM, Petr Machata wrote:
Orion Poplawskior...@cora.nwra.com writes:
I'm seeing the following boost related build error building paraview
in rawhide. Do any boost gurus know what the issue might be the
issue?
Hi there, please
Bruno Wolff III br...@wolff.to writes:
It looks like there was a soname bump in boost yesterday. Boost affects
enough stuff, that there really should have been a heads up message posted to
the devel list about this.
Yes, Denis Arnaud has kindly prepared a new release, but forgot to give
a
Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com writes:
On Tue, 2011-11-22 at 14:49 +0100, Petr Machata wrote:
Bruno Wolff III br...@wolff.to writes:
It looks like there was a soname bump in boost yesterday. Boost affects
enough stuff, that there really should have been a heads up message posted
Hi there,
SSIA. The update is ABI-breaking (at least concurrent_priority_queue
changed member layout, I didn't look further), but upstream didn't bump
soname. Rebuild is recommended. I'm CC-ing maintainers of the three
client packages that I know about.
Thanks,
PM
--
devel mailing list
Kevin Kofler kevin.kof...@chello.at writes:
It's not the Firefox maintainers, it is Mozilla who have decided that
release numbers are irrelevant and that the bug fix release for
Firefox 5 is Firefox 6.
If Firefox were following the update policy, they'd backport the security
fixes, not
Hi there,
I rebased TBB to 3.0. This should even be ABI-stable release--upstream
didn't bump the SONAME, and I verified that no ABI-looking symbols
disappeared.
Thanks,
PM
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Jon Ciesla l...@jcomserv.net writes:
Wesnoth seems not to like the new Boost all that well:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=3218720name=build.log
Is this a common sort of error? My Boost-fu is weak, so there might be
something obvious I'm missing.
Yeah, all boost errors
Petr Machata pmach...@redhat.com writes:
Jon Ciesla l...@jcomserv.net writes:
Wesnoth seems not to like the new Boost all that well:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=3218720name=build.log
Is this a common sort of error? My Boost-fu is weak, so there might be
something
Petr Machata pmach...@redhat.com writes:
Jon Ciesla l...@jcomserv.net writes:
Wesnoth seems not to like the new Boost all that well:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=3218720name=build.log
Is this a common sort of error? My Boost-fu is weak, so there might be
something
Petr Machata pmach...@redhat.com writes:
in accordance with the announced Fedora feature[1][2], we (the Boost
maintainers) plan to rebase Boost to 1.47.0 really soon now. [...]
I'll do that in the next few days and if all comes out green-ish, I'll
push the package into Fedora 16 and write
Kalev Lember kalevlem...@gmail.com writes:
On 07/18/2011 11:35 PM, Petr Machata wrote:
in accordance with the announced Fedora feature[1][2], we (the Boost
maintainers) plan to rebase Boost to 1.47.0 really soon now. Boost
1.47.0 has been released recently and Denis Arnaud kindly did
Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com writes:
On Mon, Jul 18, 2011 at 9:35 PM, Petr Machata [1]pmach...@redhat.com
wrote:
in accordance with the announced Fedora feature[1][2], we (the Boost
maintainers) plan to rebase Boost to 1.47.0 really soon now. Boost
1.47.0 has been released
.
[1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/F16Boost147
[2] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=711845
Thanks,
Petr Machata
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Bruno Wolff III br...@wolff.to writes:
I don't remember seeing a soname bump announcement for boost and since
for branched it went from 1.46.0 to 1.46.1 and then back to 1.46.0, I don't
want to start rebuilding stuff if this is going to happen in rawhide too.
It's not our plan te revert this
Bruno Wolff III br...@wolff.to writes:
On Wed, Apr 06, 2011 at 16:18:34 +0200,
Petr Machata pmach...@redhat.com wrote:
Bruno Wolff III br...@wolff.to writes:
I don't remember seeing a soname bump announcement for boost and since
for branched it went from 1.46.0 to 1.46.1 and then back
Kevin Fenzi ke...@scrye.com writes:
I have someone very interested in taking over
mediawiki-openid and php-pear-Auth-OpenID, so I will probably approve
them for those packages soon since they are both very broken and need
love, but I wonder how many of the others are in the same state. :(
Richard Shaw hobbes1...@gmail.com writes:
On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 8:19 AM, Chris Adams cmad...@hiwaay.net wrote:
This would be more appropriate on fedora-devel (any follow-up questions
should go there).
Basically, you rebuild a package when there is a good reason to rebuild
it. You've made
07.02.2011 20:03, Zach Carter wrote:
I believe my package schroot may have been hit by a 1.46 issue that is fixed
in
1.47
Is there a plan to update to 1.47 or backport the fixes?
Not in a systematic manner, but generally yes, we do fixes of this sort.
From the 1.47 changelog:
Doc
06.02.2011 15:44, Thomas Spura wrote:
I just rebuild my package and tried a random other one: xsd and it
failed:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2764873
From the looks of it, this is the case of boost::filesystem v2 vs. v3.
This will get rid of it:
diff --git a/xsd.spec
04.02.2011 14:33, Petr Machata wrote:
I'm in the process of test-driving a couple packages locally to make
sure that the new boost works. If that turns out well, I'll do a
non-scratch build of boost-1.46.0-0.beta1 later today.
The packages that I tried built OK, so I'm calling this good
Hi,
beta of boost-1.46.0 was released recently and packaged yesterday. It's
now in the git, and a scratch build[2] was done. This is in preparation
for final release that should be out on 7th, just before the feature
freeze. Providing boost-1.46.0 is one of features of F15[1].
I'm in the
04.02.2011 14:59, Rex Dieter wrote:
Petr Machata wrote:
beta of boost-1.46.0 was released recently and packaged yesterday. It's
now in the git, and a scratch build[2] was done. This is in preparation
for final release that should be out on 7th, just before the feature
freeze. Providing
04.02.2011 21:10, Bastien Nocera wrote:
Could we please either have boost.m4 packaged in Fedora, or at least
changes for running with the latest boost in Fedora integrated upstream?
What you are hitting here seems more related to gcc or binutils change.
For some reason g++ -R isn't valid
05.02.2011 00:38, Petr Machata wrote:
What you are hitting here seems more related to gcc or binutils change.
For some reason g++ -R isn't valid anymore. Passing this as g++ -Wl,-R
fixes the problem (or at least works around it). FWIW I don't see -R in
gcc manual on F14, must have been
72 matches
Mail list logo
