Re: Any new restriction in Koji added recently in Rawhide?

2019-06-13 Thread Petr Pisar
On 2019-06-13, Peter Lemenkov wrote: > I've noticed that I cannot build Elixir in Rawhide anymore. It got > stuck at tests and all I've got is a cryptic (at least to me) message: > > > + RPM_EC=0 > BUILDSTDERR: ++ jobs -p > + exit 0 > F31 has a new rpm-build with a new features. Your issue seems

Re: Heads-up: rpm 4.15 alpha coming to rawhide

2019-06-11 Thread Petr Pisar
On 2019-06-10, Panu Matilainen wrote: > > As per https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/RPM-4.15, rpm 4.15-alpha > will be hitting rawhide soon. A soname bump is involved but Igor kindly > promised to handle rebuilding all dependent packages as part of the > change, so no further action

Re: Tagging commit hashes of Koji builds in dist-git

2019-06-07 Thread Petr Pisar
On 2019-06-06, Stephen Gallagher wrote: > Might be worth asking if there's a reason to need this offline. If the > exact commit ID is stored in Koji and is authoritative, also tagging > it into git might be convenient for offline purposes. The fact that > it's not immutable is probably not an

Re: Bodhi 4.0.0 deployed, one known issue so far

2019-05-29 Thread Petr Pisar
On 2019-05-28, Dan Čermák wrote: > I just tried to submit an update via `fedpkg update` but got a failure > via the cli: > $ fedpkg update > Could not execute update: Could not generate update request: 'anonymous' > A copy of the filled in template is saved as bodhi.template.last > Similar to

perl-SQL-Shell-1.16 changed license

2019-05-24 Thread Petr Pisar
perl-SQL-Shell since 1.16 version has GPLv2+ license instead of GPLv2. -- Petr ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct:

Re: miniz: a soname bump and a license change

2019-05-22 Thread Petr Pisar
On 2019-05-22, Petr Pisar wrote: > I'm going to rebase miniz in Rawhide from 1.15_r4 to 2.1.0. The new > miniz breaks ABI (while preserving API), thus a soname will change. > I will rebuild all the two dependent packages: > > perl-Sereal-Encoder > perl-Sereal-Decoder >

miniz: a soname bump and a license change

2019-05-22 Thread Petr Pisar
Hello, I'm going to rebase miniz in Rawhide from 1.15_r4 to 2.1.0. The new miniz breaks ABI (while preserving API), thus a soname will change. I will rebuild all the two dependent packages: perl-Sereal-Encoder perl-Sereal-Decoder This new miniz also comes with a new license. It moves from

perl-GIS-Distance license change

2019-05-13 Thread Petr Pisar
perl-GIS-Distance-0.18-1.fc31 changed a license from "GPL+ or Artistic" to "GPLv3+". -- Petr ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct:

Re: flatpak crashing with SIGSEGV 11

2019-05-02 Thread Petr Pisar
On 2019-05-02, Link Dupont wrote: > I just installed Fedora 30, and flatpak is crashing after a few > seconds of downloading. abrt caught the crash and directed me to this > report[1]. It looks like the crash is in libcurl. I can't be the only > one experiencing this crash. Has anyone else seen

Re: Orphaning js-jquery

2019-04-26 Thread Petr Pisar
On 2019-04-26, Miro Hrončok wrote: > On 26. 04. 19 10:55, Vít Ondruch wrote: >> How does modularity make it easier though? >>> >>> It seems to me that it does the exact opposite - instead of having >>> one version of each package to maintain I now have multiple versions >>> to worry about! I mean

Making Perl site paths ABI-specific

2019-04-25 Thread Petr Pisar
It was a long time ago I wrote to this list. I'm thinking about changing site paths. Now, perl configures site paths to: /usr/local/lib64/perl5 /usr/local/share/perl5 so that anyone installing distributions from CPAN in a system-wide manner will install his modules there. These two

Re: Fedora modularity and cyclic dependencies

2019-04-16 Thread Petr Pisar
On 2019-04-16, Igor Gnatenko wrote: > You can do something like: > > rpms: > foo-bootstrap: > name: foo > bar: > buildafter: > - foo-bootstrap > foo: > buildafter: > - bar > How does foo.spec get to know that it should enable bootstrapping in foo-bootstrap

Re: Anyone seeing udev failing to start in Rawhide?

2019-04-11 Thread Petr Pisar
On 2019-04-10, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > ● systemd-udevd.service - udev Kernel Device Manager >Loaded: loaded (/usr/lib/systemd/system/systemd-udevd.service; static; > vendor preset: disabled) >Active: failed (Result: exit-code) since Wed 2019-04-10 09:43:21 BST; 3min > 41s ago >

Re: F31 Self-Contained Change proposal: Include several modules in the EFI build of Grub2 for security use-cases

2019-04-05 Thread Petr Pisar
On 2019-04-03, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote: > On Wednesday, 03 April 2019 at 21:30, Chris Murphy wrote: >> On Wed, Apr 3, 2019 at 2:58 AM Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski >> wrote: >> > >> > On Thursday, 28 March 2019 at 17:30, Ben Cotton wrote: >> > > On Mon, Mar 25, 2019 at 4:12 PM Ben

Re: F30 System-Wide Change proposal: Move Gold Into A SubpackageOf Binutils

2019-02-20 Thread Petr Pisar
On 2019-02-19, Ben Cotton wrote: > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/BINUTILS_GOLD > >== Summary == > Move the GOLD linker from the main binutils package into its own sub-package. > >== Owner == [...] >== Detailed Description == [...] >== Benefit to Fedora == [...] >== Scope == [...] >==

Re: F31 System-Wide Change proposal: Automatic strict inter-package dependencies

2019-02-20 Thread Petr Pisar
On 2019-02-19, Petr Pisar wrote: > I have a few packages that use "virtual provides" provided by multiple > subpackages to allow users to select an implementation that best fits > his needs. See perl-Archive-Extract for an example. > > How would you cope with this u

Re: Review request

2019-02-20 Thread Petr Pisar
On Tue, Feb 19, 2019 at 08:30:00PM +0100, Robert-André Mauchin wrote: > Can a kind soul help with a review? > > Review Request: perl-File-Rsync - Perl module interface to rsync > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1678884 > Done. Almost perfect. -- Petr signature.asc Description: PGP

Re: F31 System-Wide Change proposal: Automatic strict inter-package dependencies

2019-02-19 Thread Petr Pisar
On 2019-02-18, Ben Cotton wrote: > Let's take graphene as an example. > > Spec file contains: > > %package devel > Requires: %{name}%{?_isa} = %{version}-%{release} > %package tests > Requires: %{name}%{?_isa} = %{version}-%{release} > > > What we see when we build RPMs is: > * graphene-devel

Re: Orphaning pl (SWI Prolog)

2019-02-08 Thread Petr Pisar
On 2019-01-29, Petr Pisar wrote: > I have no interest in maintaining pl (SWI Prolog) package and thus I'm > going to orphan it. > Orphaned. -- Petr ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to

Orphaning pl (SWI Prolog)

2019-01-29 Thread Petr Pisar
I have no interest in maintaining pl (SWI Prolog) package and thus I'm going to orphan it. The package is a Prolog langugage interpreter with bundled various libraries and tools written in that language. E.g. an HTTP server or an interface to Java virtual machine. Upstream does a new major

Re: Changes in libpcreposix (a regexp emulation in PCRE)

2019-01-25 Thread Petr Pisar
On 2019-01-23, Petr Pisar wrote: > This change is implemented in pcre2-10.32-6.fc30 and pcre-8.42-7.fc30. > > For applications to take the benefit of this change, they need to be > rebuilt. I will perform the rebuild in Rawhide. These packages are > possible affected: > >

Changes in libpcreposix (a regexp emulation in PCRE)

2019-01-23 Thread Petr Pisar
I got a bug report that the applications that use a libpcreposix library crash after building with an --as-needed linker flag . It turned out that many distributions (except Fedora) have already patched libpcreposix (in an incompatible way) and

Re: perl-libs-4:5.28.1-430.fc30 is broken

2019-01-16 Thread Petr Pisar
On Wed, Jan 16, 2019 at 10:11:56AM +0100, Petr Pisar wrote: > I "fixed" perl in Rawhide yesterday (perl-libs-4:5.28.1-430.fc30) and it > causes segfaults in some cases (especially when using Tk). I'm debugging it > right now in the hope I will find the cause and the missing c

perl-libs-4:5.28.1-430.fc30 is broken

2019-01-16 Thread Petr Pisar
I "fixed" perl in Rawhide yesterday (perl-libs-4:5.28.1-430.fc30) and it causes segfaults in some cases (especially when using Tk). I'm debugging it right now in the hope I will find the cause and the missing changes from blead. If I don't, I will revert the patch till the end of today. -- Petr

Re: Signing Kernel Module with the Private Key

2019-01-10 Thread Petr Pisar
On 2019-01-10, Chris Murphy wrote: > [root@fnuc extra]# perl > /usr/src/kernels/4.19.14-300.fc29.x86_64/scripts/sign-file sha256 > /home/chris/MOK.priv /home/chris/MOK.der icp.ko > Unrecognized character \x7F; marked by <-- HERE after <-- HERE near > column 1 at

Re: perl: warning: Setting locale failed.

2019-01-08 Thread Petr Pisar
On Tue, Jan 08, 2019 at 06:02:48PM +0100, Petr Šabata wrote: > On Tue, Jan 08, 2019 at 05:58:35PM +0100, Emmanuel Seyman wrote: > > * Ralf Corsepius [08/01/2019 17:33] : > > > > > > Adding > > > BuildRequires: glibc-all-langpacks > > > to all the *.specs obviously fixes this issue. However, I

[EPEL-devel] Re: Does EPEL support people who do not upgrade RHEL?

2019-01-06 Thread Petr Pisar
On Fri, Jan 04, 2019 at 11:36:31AM -0800, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > On 1/4/19 12:54 AM, Igor Gnatenko wrote: > > I believe that EPEL is not meant to support all possible old versions of > > RHEL. It is built against latest release, so the expectation is that it > > supports only latest release. > >

[EPEL-devel] Does EPEL support people who do not upgrade RHEL?

2019-01-04 Thread Petr Pisar
Hello, I have a question regarding packaging for EPEL. Fedora renamed perl package to perl-interpreter package and changed all the occurances in all spec files. Because there are package maintainers who share spec files between Fedora and EPEL, I added the perl-interpreter package to EPEL.

perl-NetPacket-1.7.0 license change

2019-01-03 Thread Petr Pisar
perl-NetPacket-1.7.0 changes a license from (Artistic 2.0) to (Artistic 2.0 and CC-BY). -- Petr ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct:

Re: Fedora Lifecycles: imagine longer-term possibilities

2018-12-06 Thread Petr Pisar
On 2018-12-06, Daniel P Berrangé wrote: > On Thu, Dec 06, 2018 at 02:48:32PM +0000, Petr Pisar wrote: >> On 2018-12-06, Florian Weimer wrote: >> > In a sense, it's the old discussion between explicit rename recording >> > and rename detection. I think it's clear b

Re: Fedora Lifecycles: imagine longer-term possibilities

2018-12-06 Thread Petr Pisar
On 2018-12-06, Florian Weimer wrote: > In a sense, it's the old discussion between explicit rename recording > and rename detection. I think it's clear by now that rename detection > has won. > Can you give us some example of a rename detection that works? If a packager cherry-picks patches, he

Re: [HEADS UP] Rawhide buildroot now has glibc-minimal-langpack instead

2018-12-03 Thread Petr Pisar
On 2018-11-28, Igor Gnatenko wrote: > the removal of glibc-all-langpacks from the buildroot[0] is done. > Standard buildroot has decreased from 445 to 237 megabytes in > installed size ;) > That's nice, but Koji builders have not been reconfigured away from LANG=en_US.UTF-8 and that means that

Re: Something is broken in low-level components, processes segfault

2018-11-21 Thread Petr Pisar
On 2018-11-21, Igor Gnatenko wrote: > https://apps.fedoraproject.org/koschei/build/5700914 > > process didn't exit successfully: `/usr/bin/rustc --crate-name > glib_sys src/lib.rs --color never --crate-type lib > --emit=dep-info,link -C opt-level=3 -C metadata=20d7ee6da134c60a -C >

Re: Container updates available in bodhi

2018-11-15 Thread Petr Pisar
On 2018-11-15, Clement Verna wrote: > On Thu, 15 Nov 2018 at 13:55, Petr Pisar wrote: > >> On 2018-11-14, Clement Verna wrote: >> > After a successful OSBS build, a bodhi update can be created. Fedpkg does >> > not yet support creating updates for containers

Re: Container updates available in bodhi

2018-11-15 Thread Petr Pisar
On 2018-11-14, Clement Verna wrote: > After a successful OSBS build, a bodhi update can be created. Fedpkg does > not yet support creating updates for containers [0], so you have to either > use bodhi web UI or the bodhi cli. For example > > bodhi updates new --type enhancement --notes

icecast-2.4.4 license correction

2018-11-02 Thread Petr Pisar
I've just built icecast-2.4.4 for all Fedoras and EPEL-7 and corrected a license tag from "GPLv2+" to "GPLv2+ and GPLv2 and BSD" in icecast binary package and to "GPLv2+ and MIT and FSFULLR and FSFUL" in icecast-doc binary package to reflect the reality (the GPLv2 only code also existed in older

indent license corrected

2018-09-13 Thread Petr Pisar
While rebasing indent package to a fresh new 2.2.12 release (done after 8 years), I corrected license declaration from "GPLv3+" to "GPLv3+ and BSD and Verbatim". -- Petr ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an

Re: Buildroot-only modules

2018-09-07 Thread Petr Pisar
On 2018-09-07, Petr Šabata wrote: > I suppose there could be other tools that > would allow you to download such modules so you could play with > them without polluting the "applications" repo. > Yes, there are , especially bin/moduleprovides for

Re: Intent to split 'postgresql.spec' into 'libpq.spec' and 'libecpg.spec'

2018-08-30 Thread Petr Pisar
On 2018-08-29, Vít Ondruch wrote: > While the split is reasonable, this change has IMHO one big flaw and > that is the change of the names, which are not really intuitive. > I second that. I'd rather see postgresql-client providing the libpq library. It's symmetric to postgresql-server name. --

Re: Fwd: fedora-tagger sunset - week post F29 beta freeze

2018-08-28 Thread Petr Pisar
On 2018-08-28, Mattia Verga wrote: >> On 2018-08-26, Mattia Verga > :( >> >> -- Petr > The Group tag would not fix exactly what I mean. I wouldn't want to > create groups of packages, but apply descriptive tags of the abilities > of the

Re: Fwd: fedora-tagger sunset - week post F29 beta freeze

2018-08-27 Thread Petr Pisar
On 2018-08-26, Mattia Verga wrote: >> On 24.8.2018 10:04, Clement Verna wrote: >> >> Oh no, the press-random-arrows-to-get-badges app will be gone :D > > Actually, I would find tags useful for searching packages related to > a specific field: for example, I would like to search for 'astronomy' >

Re: Fedora 30 System-Wide Change proposal: Remove glibc-all-langpacks from buildroot

2018-08-24 Thread Petr Pisar
On 2018-08-22, Ben Cotton wrote: > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Remove_glibc-langpacks-all_from_buildroot > > glibc-minimal-langpack is added to @Buildsystem group and installed > into the minimal buildroot instead of glibc-all-langpacks. Packages > which need more locales than plain

perl-Net-DNS-Nameserver-1.17-1.fc29 license change

2018-08-07 Thread Petr Pisar
perl-Net-DNS-Nameserver-1.17-1.fc29 binary package corrected a license from "GPL+ or Artistic" to "MIT". -- Petr ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of

sharutils license corrected

2018-07-24 Thread Petr Pisar
I corrected sharutils' license tag from: GPLv3+ and (LGPLv3+ or BSD) and LGPLv2+ and Public Domain and GFDL to: GPLv3+ and (GPLv3+ and BSD) and (LGPLv3+ or BSD) and LGPLv2+ and Public Domain and GFDL -- Petr ___ devel mailing list --

perl-File-MMagic license corrected

2018-07-16 Thread Petr Pisar
I corrected a license tag at the perl-File-MMagic-1.30-16.fc29 package from "ASL 1.0 and BSD" to "App-s2p and ASL 1.0 and BSD". -- Petr ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to

Re: Fedora 29 Mass Rebuild

2018-07-13 Thread Petr Pisar
On 2018-07-12, Mohan Boddu wrote: > Things got fixed quicker than expected. The issues related to binutils > is fixed with binutils-2.30.90-3.fc29 build. > Taskotron reports on SDL rebuild

Re: [HEADS UP] Removal of GCC from the buildroot

2018-07-12 Thread Petr Pisar
On 2018-07-11, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > The effects of fsync are impossible to see unless you hard-reboot the > machine. Are you sure non-fsynced changes are are guaranteed to be visible on block cache level? E.g. if you mix read/write and mmaped I/O from different processes? > I

Re: Perl 5.28 upgrade

2018-07-06 Thread Petr Pisar
On Wed, Jul 04, 2018 at 10:41:25AM +0200, Petr Pisar wrote: > On Tue, Jun 26, 2018 at 07:47:59AM +0200, Jitka Plesnikova wrote: > > Perl 5.28 change was discussed on FESCO meeting and was accepted. > > Perl 5.28 was released on June 23 2018 and mass rebuild can start. > > >

Re: Merging Perl 5.28 to Fedora 29

2018-07-06 Thread Petr Pisar
On 2018-07-04, Petr Pisar wrote: > Perl SIG completed Perl 5.28 upgrade > <https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/perl5.28> in f29-perl side tag > that involved rebuildnig about 3000 packags. Once relengs merge the tag > back to f29 <https://pagure.io/releng/issue/7583&g

Re: installing glibc-minimal-langpack in buildroots

2018-07-06 Thread Petr Pisar
On 2018-07-05, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > On Thu, Jul 05, 2018 at 01:19:38PM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: >> On Thu, Jul 05, 2018 at 02:41:01PM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote: >> > On 07/05/2018 02:28 PM, Stephen Gallagher wrote: >> > >So if we made this change, it should >> >

Merging Perl 5.28 to Fedora 29

2018-07-04 Thread Petr Pisar
Hello, Perl SIG completed Perl 5.28 upgrade in f29-perl side tag that involved rebuildnig about 3000 packags. Once relengs merge the tag back to f29 , the new Perl becomes available. If you encounter any

Re: Perl 5.28 upgrade

2018-07-04 Thread Petr Pisar
On Tue, Jun 26, 2018 at 07:47:59AM +0200, Jitka Plesnikova wrote: > Perl 5.28 change was discussed on FESCO meeting and was accepted. > Perl 5.28 was released on June 23 2018 and mass rebuild can start. > > I have required `f29-perl' build-root for this purpose and it was created. > > I will

Re: change in -fpic handling?

2018-06-26 Thread Petr Pisar
On 2018-06-26, Dave Love wrote: > What has changed in the last month to affect building shared libraries > in rawhide? > > I tried to rebuild libxsmm in rawhide, after changing the spec to use > python2 explicitly, and it failed with > Did you check continuous integration results

Re: F29 System Wide Change: Modules for Everyone

2018-06-21 Thread Petr Pisar
On 2018-06-21, Stephen Gallagher wrote: > On Thu, Jun 21, 2018 at 5:17 AM Kevin Kofler wrote: >> Will the repositories be enabled or disabled by default? >> > > Enabled by default. Packaging policy will require that modules with a > default stream may not override packages in the standard repo.

Re: Packages which call install-info in scriptlets

2018-06-18 Thread Petr Pisar
On 2018-06-18, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote: >>>>>> "PP" == Petr Pisar writes: > >PP> What about uninstallation? > > That is covered by the existing triggers: > > %transfiletriggerpostun -n info -- %{_infodir} > [ -f %{_infodir}/dir ] &&

Re: Packages which call install-info in scriptlets

2018-06-18 Thread Petr Pisar
On 2018-06-16, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote: > As of Fedora 28, the 'info' package has gained a file trigger > (%transfiletrigger) which will automatically rebuild the info directory > node when any file is installed into %_infodir. What about uninstallation? I've just removed the scriptlets from

Re: ga (global arrays) package maintainer needed

2018-06-12 Thread Petr Pisar
On 2018-06-12, Marcin Dulak wrote: > What is the current policy about bundling in Fedora? > . -- Petr ___ devel mailing list --

Re: Perl modules looking for new owners

2018-06-08 Thread Petr Pisar
On Fri, Jun 08, 2018 at 10:36:06AM +0100, Paul Howarth wrote: > On Fri, 8 Jun 2018 10:01:36 +0100 > Daniel P. Berrangé wrote: > > > On Wed, Jun 06, 2018 at 01:04:37PM +0100, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote: > > > Over the years I've added a number of Perl modules to Fedora for > > > apps I needed at

Re: Perl modules looking for new owners

2018-06-08 Thread Petr Pisar
On Fri, Jun 08, 2018 at 10:36:06AM +0100, Paul Howarth wrote: > On Fri, 8 Jun 2018 10:01:36 +0100 > Daniel P. Berrangé wrote: > > > On Wed, Jun 06, 2018 at 01:04:37PM +0100, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote: > > > Over the years I've added a number of Perl modules to Fedora for > > > apps I needed at

Re: F29 System Wide Change: Strong crypto settings: phase 2

2018-06-06 Thread Petr Pisar
On 2018-06-05, John Florian wrote: > Makes sense, but what is the best way to deal with such old HW if you're > stuck with it?  I don't want to compromise my workstation for all my > normal needs just to deal with some ancient embedded https server, but > it would kind of suck to have to boot

Re: CPAN Search Going Away

2018-06-04 Thread Petr Pisar
On Mon, Jun 04, 2018 at 01:53:07PM +0200, Petr Pisar wrote: > On Thu, May 24, 2018 at 06:34:38PM +0200, Petr Pisar wrote: > > I can mass update spec files for all Perl packages. I submitted this Fedora > > 29 > > change request > > <https://fedoraproject.org/wiki

Re: F29 System Wide Change: Perl Move to MetaCPAN

2018-06-04 Thread Petr Pisar
On 2018-06-04, Petr Pisar wrote: > On 2018-05-25, Jan Kurik wrote: >>= Proposed System Wide Change: Perl Move to MetaCPAN = >> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Perl_Move_to_MetaCPAN >> > This change was approved and I will start updating the packages in a few >

Re: F29 System Wide Change: Perl Move to MetaCPAN

2018-06-04 Thread Petr Pisar
On 2018-05-25, Jan Kurik wrote: >= Proposed System Wide Change: Perl Move to MetaCPAN = > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Perl_Move_to_MetaCPAN > This change was approved and I will start updating the packages in a few moments. Each affected package will receive one commit with "cpan.org

Re: CPAN Search Going Away

2018-06-04 Thread Petr Pisar
On Thu, May 24, 2018 at 06:34:38PM +0200, Petr Pisar wrote: > I can mass update spec files for all Perl packages. I submitted this Fedora 29 > change request <https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Perl_Move_to_MetaCPAN> The change was approved. I will start updating the packages so

Re: CPAN Search Going Away

2018-05-25 Thread Petr Pisar
On Thu, May 24, 2018 at 06:34:38PM +0200, Petr Pisar wrote: > I submitted this Fedora 29 change request > <https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Perl_Move_to_MetaCPAN> and this > packaging guidelines request > <https://pagure.io/packaging-committee/issue/770>. > The Per

Re: CPAN Search Going Away

2018-05-25 Thread Petr Pisar
On Thu, May 24, 2018 at 12:55:27PM -0400, Dan Book wrote: > The changes look good to me. However, the source URL does not really need > to be updated (it will still mirror the file); www.cpan.org is not > changing, only search.cpan.org is. I know. But metacpan.org's Download links point to

Re: CPAN Search Going Away

2018-05-24 Thread Petr Pisar
On Fri, May 18, 2018 at 10:55:02AM +0100, Dave Cross wrote: > See https://log.perl.org/2018/05/goodbye-search-dot-cpan-dot-org.html > > This means that the URLs included in RPMs of CPAN modules will need to > change to MetaCPAN URLs. > > Please let me know if I can be any help making this

perl-podlators-4.11 license change

2018-05-09 Thread Petr Pisar
perl-podlators-4.11 changes licence from "(GPL+ or Artistic) and MIT" to "(GPL+ or Artistic) and FSFAP". -- Petr ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Prioritizing ~/.local/bin over /usr/bin on the PATH

2018-05-04 Thread Petr Pisar
On 2018-05-03, Tomas Orsava wrote: > On 05/02/2018 05:14 PM, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote: >> On Wed, May 02, 2018 at 11:10:05AM -0400, Siteshwar Vashisht wrote: >>> >>> - Original Message - From: "Daniel P. Berrangé" To: "Development

Re: OpenCOLLADA build error

2018-04-24 Thread Petr Pisar
On 2018-04-20, Richard Shaw wrote: > > I'm getting the following error when I build with mock in both f27 and > rawhide: > > BUILDSTDERR: In file included from > /builddir/build/BUILD/OpenCOLLADA-1.6.62/COLLADABaseUtils/src/COLLADABUURI.cpp:18: > BUILDSTDERR:

Re: starting services in fedora

2018-04-17 Thread Petr Pisar
On 2018-04-17, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek <zbys...@in.waw.pl> wrote: > On Tue, Apr 17, 2018 at 08:30:59AM +0200, Miroslav Suchý wrote: >> Dne 17.4.2018 v 07:46 Petr Pisar napsal(a): >> > Maybe nobody knows how to determine a system is live. >> >> +1 > >

Re: starting services in fedora

2018-04-16 Thread Petr Pisar
On 2018-04-17, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > I'm a bit surprised that there's no reply to this fairly explosive > idea. Maybe Nikos' text is too long, so let me summarize: > > tl;dr: the proposal is to start services immediately during > installation (in %post), iff they

Re: DNF dependencies and --allowerasing

2018-04-04 Thread Petr Pisar
On 2018-04-03, Przemek Klosowski wrote: > Recently, upgrading pymol was blocked because of version incompatiblity > with pymol-wxpython: > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1563269 > > The previous version is 1.8.6 and both packages are closely coupled so

Re: [ACTION NEEDED #2] Missing BuildRequires: gcc/gcc-c++

2018-03-07 Thread Petr Pisar
On 2018-03-07, Sandro Mani wrote: > I.e. mmg3d reports "No CMAKE_CXX_COMPILER could be found.", but mmg3d is > a pure C library, so I suppose it is just cmake which checks for a c++ > compiler regardless of whether it is used or not. C++ is the default language cmake

perl-Test-PostgreSQL license change

2018-03-05 Thread Petr Pisar
I missed a license change in perl-Test-PostgreSQL-1.06 (2015 year). The old license was "Artistic 2.0 and (GPL+ or Artistic)", the new one is "Artistic 2.0". An updated package heads to all Fedoras that will fix it. -- Petr ___ devel mailing list --

Re: rawhide: Can't locate ExtUtils/CBuilder.pm

2018-03-01 Thread Petr Pisar
On Thu, Mar 01, 2018 at 10:33:25AM +, Paul Howarth wrote: > That'll be because Server-Starter's Build.PL has > > "c_source => [qw()]," > > And that's generated by Minilla, so all non-XS Minilla-based dists are > likely to be affected. > Indeed. I reported a bug against Minilla

Re: rawhide: Can't locate ExtUtils/CBuilder.pm

2018-03-01 Thread Petr Pisar
On Thu, Mar 01, 2018 at 09:38:08AM +0100, Ralf Corsepius wrote: > Hi, > > perl-Plack fails to build in rawhide with > this error[1] > > ... > + /usr/bin/perl Build.PL --installdirs=vendor > Can't locate ExtUtils/CBuilder.pm in @INC (you may need to install the > ExtUtils::CBuilder module) (@INC

Re: Adapting Perl packages to GCC removal from Fedora 29 build root

2018-02-23 Thread Petr Pisar
On Fri, Feb 23, 2018 at 02:22:38PM +0100, Robert-André Mauchin wrote: > What about packages that use perl(XSLoader) but not perl(Module::Build)? > Shouldn't they require gcc too? > If you mean build-requiring gcc because your package run-requires XSLoader because it packages an XS code the is

Adapting Perl packages to GCC removal from Fedora 29 build root

2018-02-23 Thread Petr Pisar
It's a long time I sent a message here. And because your read my new message, it means something is wrong. Here it is: GCC won't be in the minimal build root since Fedora 29. That affects Perl packages that executes gcc at build

Re: "Bodhi is unable to request this update for stabilization: invalid syntax (ssl.py, line 7)"

2018-02-13 Thread Petr Pisar
On 2018-02-13, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > What does it mean? > I opened . -- Petr ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to

Re: pghmcfc pushed to perl-Ref-Util-XS (master). "Update to 0.117 (..more)"

2018-02-01 Thread Petr Pisar
On Thu, Feb 01, 2018 at 01:16:15PM +0100, Petr Pisar wrote: > It does not exist in EPEL 6. I will add it there. > I submitted <https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2018-35805e33b6> to testing. You can add perl-generators-1.08-5.el6 into the build root, if you ne

Re: pghmcfc pushed to perl-Ref-Util-XS (master). "Update to 0.117 (..more)"

2018-02-01 Thread Petr Pisar
On Thu, Feb 01, 2018 at 11:39:55AM +, Paul Howarth wrote: > On Thu, 1 Feb 2018 11:38:57 +0100 > Petr Pisar <ppi...@redhat.com> wrote: > > > On Thu, Feb 01, 2018 at 09:04:14AM +, > > notificati...@fedoraproject.org wrote: > > > --- a/perl-Ref-Util-XS.sp

Re: pghmcfc pushed to perl-Ref-Util-XS (master). "Update to 0.117 (..more)"

2018-02-01 Thread Petr Pisar
On Thu, Feb 01, 2018 at 09:04:14AM +, notificati...@fedoraproject.org wrote: > --- a/perl-Ref-Util-XS.spec > +++ b/perl-Ref-Util-XS.spec > @@ -13,9 +13,9 @@ BuildRequires: coreutils > BuildRequires: findutils > BuildRequires: gcc > BuildRequires: make >

perl-RDF-RDFa-Generator license change

2018-01-31 Thread Petr Pisar
perl-RDF-RDFa-Generator-0.192-1.fc28 changed license from: (GPL+ or Artistic) and CC-BY-SA and Public Domain to: (GPL+ or Artistic) and Public Domain. -- Petr ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to

Re: -z defs linker flag activated in Fedora rawhide

2018-01-30 Thread Petr Pisar
On 2018-01-25, Petr Pisar <ppi...@redhat.com> wrote: > On 2018-01-25, Daniel P Berrangé <berra...@redhat.com> wrote: >> Not neccessarily - with perl, the APIs used by extensions are actually >> in libperl.so, not /usr/bin/perl, and the extensions link to libperl.so >

Re: Fedora27: NFS v4 terrible write performance, is async working

2018-01-30 Thread Petr Pisar
On Tue, Jan 30, 2018 at 08:31:05AM +0100, Reindl Harald wrote: > Am 30.01.2018 um 08:25 schrieb Petr Pisar: > > On 2018-01-29, J. Bruce Fields <bfie...@redhat.com> wrote: > > > The file create isn't allowed to return until the server has created the > > > file an

Re: Fwd: Re: Fedora27: NFS v4 terrible write performance, is async working

2018-01-29 Thread Petr Pisar
On 2018-01-29, J. Bruce Fields wrote: > The file create isn't allowed to return until the server has created the > file and the change has actually reached disk. > Why is there such a requirement? This is not true for local file systems. This is why fsync() exists. -- Petr

Re: -z defs linker flag activated in Fedora rawhide

2018-01-29 Thread Petr Pisar
On Thu, Jan 25, 2018 at 04:14:52PM +, Tom Hughes wrote: > There seems to be a similar issue with perl extensions that use C++ failing > to link due to missing libstdc++ symbols, eg: > > https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=24412387 > > I think in that case the issue is that

Re: -z defs linker flag activated in Fedora rawhide

2018-01-25 Thread Petr Pisar
On 2018-01-25, Daniel P Berrangé wrote: > Not neccessarily - with perl, the APIs used by extensions are actually > in libperl.so, not /usr/bin/perl, and the extensions link to libperl.so > So perl binary modules ought to still build without undefined symbols, > as IIUC

Re: microcode updates and spectre variant 2

2018-01-16 Thread Petr Pisar
On 2018-01-15, Randy Barlow wrote: > I'm quite surprised that my PIII is getting a microcode update. It's 18 > years old! > I assume Intel simply released latest microcode for all processors they had some regardless of the Spectre bug. Probably some of them have

Re: F28 System Wide Change: Removal of Sun RPC Interfaces From glibc

2018-01-09 Thread Petr Pisar
On 2018-01-05, Florian Weimer wrote: > perl-PDL-2.18.0-4.fc27.src.rpm [...] > This is based on relatively current Fedora rawhide/x86_64 and reflects > which currently uses svc_/clnt_/xdr_ symbols from glibc. It does not > indicate whether these packages can use libtirpc

Re: time-1.8 changes license and output

2017-11-09 Thread Petr Pisar
On 2017-11-08, Matthew Miller <mat...@fedoraproject.org> wrote: > On Wed, Nov 08, 2017 at 05:06:11PM +0000, Petr Pisar wrote: >> I hope Fedora's time-1.8 won't disrupt your scripts so blatantly. > > Let's land this in F28 (rawhide) and not update in F27. And make sure >

time-1.8 changes license and output

2017-11-08 Thread Petr Pisar
After many years a new 1.8 version of "time" tool was released. This version brings some noticable changes: (1) License changed from (GPLv2+) to (GPLv3+ and GFDL). (2) Additional exit codes are used to report meassured command failures and failures to execute the command. (3) A meassured

pl-7.6.1 license change

2017-11-08 Thread Petr Pisar
pl package in version 7.6.1 that is being built for Fedora >= 28 changed license from: (BSD and (GPLv2+ with exceptions or Artistic 2.0)) and (GPL+ or Artistic) and (BSD or GPL) and LGPLv2+ and TCL and UCD and MIT and BSD and Public Domain to: (BSD and (GPLv2+ with exceptions or

Re: [HEADS UP] Removed legacy provides from coreutils

2017-11-08 Thread Petr Pisar
On 2017-11-08, Igor Gnatenko wrote: > On Tue, 2017-11-07 at 23:58 +, Sérgio Basto wrote: >> Script of startup of Azureus use mktemp >> >> cat /usr/bin/azureus | grep mktemp >> >> TMP_SCRIPT=$(mktemp) >> >> mktemp will be disappeared or will be

Re: Is it possible to upload new sources of a package from a URL?

2017-09-26 Thread Petr Pisar
On 2017-09-26, Richard W.M. Jones <rjo...@redhat.com> wrote: > On Tue, Sep 26, 2017 at 07:18:12AM +0000, Petr Pisar wrote: >> On 2017-09-25, Hedayat Vatankhah <hedayat@gmail.com> wrote: >> > /*Pierre-yves Chibon*/ wrote on Mon, 25 Sep 2017 09:38:39 +0200:

Re: Is it possible to upload new sources of a package from a URL?

2017-09-26 Thread Petr Pisar
On 2017-09-25, Hedayat Vatankhah wrote: > /*Pierre-yves Chibon*/ wrote on Mon, 25 Sep 2017 09:38:39 +0200: >> It's an interesting idea but then it would become quite hard to check >> if there is a mitm attack of some sort. With the current process, at >> least the packager

Broken perl-libwww-perl-6.27-1.fc28

2017-09-22 Thread Petr Pisar
I accidentally build perl-libwww-perl-6.27-1.fc28 that cannot be installed because of broken dependencies. There is already perl-libwww-perl-6.27-2.fc28 that fixes, but it still has not yet get into f28-build target. Hopefully next compose will resolve it because it looks like after introducing

Re: How to chainbuild in a build override?

2017-09-22 Thread Petr Pisar
On 2017-09-22, Ralf Corsepius wrote: > How to build a sub tree of packages in fc27, when the root of this tree > changed SONAME? > In rawhide, if you want a longer time isolation, you ask relengs for a sige tag, you do all builds there without affecting others and then you

Re: Providing ABI/API assurances for the base runtime in Fedora.

2017-09-15 Thread Petr Pisar
On Thu, Sep 14, 2017 at 12:28:51PM -0500, Carlos O'Donell wrote: > With the split I'm suggesting for interface/implementation you could move > your installed glibc to any release you want that is no older than the > platform-glibc package used to build all of your installed packages. > And that

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >