Re: Proposal: gate stable release critical path updates on openQA test results

2021-01-10 Thread Pierre-Yves Chibon
On Fri, Jan 08, 2021 at 05:24:11PM -0500, Matthew Miller wrote: > On Fri, Jan 08, 2021 at 09:34:29PM +0100, Kevin Kofler via devel wrote: > > > So if anything, I think this change is in line with your views here. > > > > Well, if (and as long as) the gating only blocks the autopush and does not

Re: HOWTO: Change default branch on pagure.io projects

2021-01-06 Thread Pierre-Yves Chibon
On Wed, Jan 06, 2021 at 07:16:44AM -, Wolfgang Stoeggl via devel wrote: > > git push origin :master > > (This deletes the old ‘master’ branch) > > git push origin :master > remote: Branch deletion is not allowed > remote: Denied push for ref 'refs/heads/master' for user '**' > remote: All

Re: Planned Outage - taiga - 2021-01-05 07:00 UTC

2021-01-04 Thread Pierre-Yves Chibon
On Thu, Dec 31, 2020 at 05:33:08PM +0100, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: > There will be an outage starting at 2021-01-05 07:00 UTC > which will last approximately 3 hours. > > To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UTCHowto >

Re: Fedora 34 Change: Enable spec file preprocessing (System-Wide Change proposal)

2021-01-04 Thread Pierre-Yves Chibon
On Thu, Dec 17, 2020 at 09:14:40PM +0100, Fabio Valentini wrote: > On Thu, Dec 17, 2020 at 8:06 PM Ben Cotton wrote: > > > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Enable_Spec_File_Preprocessing > > > > > > == Summary == > > This change should enable an opt-in spec file preprocessor in Fedora > >

Re: Stale proven packagers

2021-01-04 Thread Pierre-Yves Chibon
On Tue, Dec 22, 2020 at 01:39:26PM -0800, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Tue, 2020-12-22 at 13:23 -0800, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > > > > Perhaps we need a process for cleaning up membership of this extremely > > > powerful group? If the FAS password of *any one* of those user accounts > > > were

Re: Stale proven packagers

2021-01-04 Thread Pierre-Yves Chibon
On Tue, Dec 22, 2020 at 12:39:56PM -0800, Adam Williamson wrote: > A propos of some discussion of the Solarwinds news, it occurred to me > to check how many proven packager accounts there are in FAS. There are > 251, which seems like a lot. Then it occurred to me to check how many > of them are

Planned Outage - taiga - 2021-01-05 07:00 UTC

2020-12-31 Thread Pierre-Yves Chibon
There will be an outage starting at 2021-01-05 07:00 UTC which will last approximately 3 hours. To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UTCHowto or run: date -d '2021-01-05 07:00UTC' Reason for outage: Upgrade to a more recent/patched taiga

Planned Outage - taiga - 2021-01-05 07:00 UTC

2020-12-31 Thread Pierre-Yves Chibon
There will be an outage starting at 2021-01-05 07:00 UTC which will last approximately 3 hours. To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UTCHowto or run: date -d '2021-01-05 07:00UTC' Reason for outage: Upgrade to a more recent/patched taiga

Re: GitLab AMA Topic Follow Up: Branches

2020-12-14 Thread Pierre-Yves Chibon
On Sun, Dec 13, 2020 at 04:18:44PM +, Aoife Moloney wrote: > Hi everyone, > > Its been a few weeks but there are still two topics left to cover from > the original AMA session. This week's topic is Branches. As always, > below are some links to the original documents and chat logs from the >

Re: koji buildsystem changes

2020-12-14 Thread Pierre-Yves Chibon
On Sun, Dec 13, 2020 at 08:42:53PM -0700, Jerry James wrote: > On Sun, Dec 13, 2020 at 3:22 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > * Finally releng is looking at establishing a sidetag cleanup policy. > > A reminder that sidetags should be short lived and only created when > > needed. koji must generate

Re: Fedora 34 Change: GitRepos-master-to-main (Self-Contained Change)

2020-12-10 Thread Pierre-Yves Chibon
On Thu, Dec 10, 2020 at 10:29:12AM -0800, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > On Thu, Dec 10, 2020 at 10:36:36AM +0100, Robert-André Mauchin wrote: > > On 12/3/20 4:02 PM, Ben Cotton wrote: > > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/GitRepos-master-to-main > > > > > > == Summary == > > > > > > This Change

Re: Fedora 34 Change: GitRepos-master-to-main (Self-Contained Change)

2020-12-03 Thread Pierre-Yves Chibon
On Thu, Dec 03, 2020 at 04:56:09PM +0100, Clement Verna wrote: >On Thu, 3 Dec 2020 at 16:21, Pierre-Yves Chibon <[1]pin...@pingoured.fr> >wrote: > > On Thu, Dec 03, 2020 at 04:08:26PM +0100, Fabio Valentini wrote: > > On Thu, Dec 3, 2020 at 4:0

Re: Fedora 34 Change: GitRepos-master-to-main (Self-Contained Change)

2020-12-03 Thread Pierre-Yves Chibon
On Thu, Dec 03, 2020 at 04:39:35PM +0100, Petr Šabata wrote: > On Thu, Dec 3, 2020 at 4:34 PM Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: > > > > On Thu, Dec 03, 2020 at 04:16:56PM +0100, Petr Šabata wrote: > > > Since I don't see those on the list, does this impact > > > >

Re: Fedora 34 Change: GitRepos-master-to-main (Self-Contained Change)

2020-12-03 Thread Pierre-Yves Chibon
On Thu, Dec 03, 2020 at 04:16:56PM +0100, Petr Šabata wrote: > Since I don't see those on the list, does this impact > > * rpkg (fedpkg)? Wrapper to git, should not be impacted. The only thing I could think of was: when we fedpkg clone an empty git repo, have fedpkg do the "git branch -M main"

Re: Fedora 34 Change: GitRepos-master-to-main (Self-Contained Change)

2020-12-03 Thread Pierre-Yves Chibon
On Thu, Dec 03, 2020 at 04:08:26PM +0100, Fabio Valentini wrote: > On Thu, Dec 3, 2020 at 4:03 PM Ben Cotton wrote: > > > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/GitRepos-master-to-main > > > > == Summary == > > > > This Change will move Fedora git repositories to use "main" as the > > default

Re: GitLab AMA Topic Follow Up: Namespace & Issue Tracking

2020-11-27 Thread Pierre-Yves Chibon
On Mon, Nov 23, 2020 at 10:22:25AM +, Aoife Moloney wrote: > # GitLab AMA Session Topic - Namespace & Issue Tracking > > Hi everyone, > > Thanks again for your involvement in the GitLab AMA session on IRC in > September. This email discussion thread is on Namespace & Issue > Tracking. I have

Re: CPE Weekly: 2020-11-22

2020-11-24 Thread Pierre-Yves Chibon
On Tue, Nov 24, 2020 at 06:30:10AM -, Tom Seewald wrote: > > On Mon, 23 Nov 2020 at 05:54, Aoife Moloney > wrote: > > > > What is OSBS? Please don't use undefined acronyms. > > OSBS = OpenShift Build Service It's the tool we use to build containers in our infrastructure (and thus also

Re: Summary/Minutes from today's FESCo Meeting (2020-11-11)

2020-11-13 Thread Pierre-Yves Chibon
On Fri, Nov 13, 2020 at 10:11:28AM +0100, Petr Pisar wrote: > On Fri, Nov 13, 2020 at 09:58:22AM +0100, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: > > On Fri, Nov 13, 2020 at 12:52:06AM +0100, Kevin Kofler via devel wrote: > > > Matthew Miller wrote: > > > > Well, except, it clearly

Re: Summary/Minutes from today's FESCo Meeting (2020-11-11)

2020-11-13 Thread Pierre-Yves Chibon
On Fri, Nov 13, 2020 at 12:52:06AM +0100, Kevin Kofler via devel wrote: > Matthew Miller wrote: > > Well, except, it clearly *does* work that way. We have many > > lightly-maintained packages in practice. > > Do we really? Which are those packages? Every single package that failed to build from

Re: Self Introduction: Davide Cavalca

2020-10-29 Thread Pierre-Yves Chibon
On Thu, Oct 29, 2020 at 11:52:09AM -0700, Michel Alexandre Salim wrote: > On Thu, 2020-10-29 at 13:12 +0100, Vít Ondruch wrote: > >   > > This might be a good time to start discussing the possibility of > > having > > "organization" ACLs (e.g. if a bunch of employees at FB, or Datto, or > >

Re: Mass spec change: Replace Python 3 version globs (3.?) with macros to support 3.10

2020-10-29 Thread Pierre-Yves Chibon
On Thu, Oct 29, 2020 at 02:05:53PM -, Tomas Hrnciar wrote: > Hello everyone, > > I am just letting you know that we successfully replaced all 3.? globs > yesterday. Thanks! Both for doing it and the heads-up :) Pierre ___ devel mailing list --

Re: GitLab AMA Topic Discussion: Permissions & Access

2020-10-28 Thread Pierre-Yves Chibon
On Wed, Oct 28, 2020 at 09:56:11AM -0400, Neal Gompa wrote: > On Wed, Oct 28, 2020 at 8:57 AM Pierre-Yves Chibon > wrote: > > > > On Sun, Oct 25, 2020 at 09:17:04PM +, Aoife Moloney wrote: > > > Hi everyone, > > > > > > Thanks again for your

Re: GitLab AMA Topic Discussion: Permissions & Access

2020-10-28 Thread Pierre-Yves Chibon
On Sun, Oct 25, 2020 at 09:17:04PM +, Aoife Moloney wrote: > Hi everyone, > > Thanks again for your involvement in the GitLab AMA session on IRC in > September. As promised, this is the first of a 5-part series breaking > down main topics that came up during the session. I will send a topic >

Re: Unresponsive packagers: wolnei and dturecek

2020-10-13 Thread Pierre-Yves Chibon
On Sat, Oct 10, 2020 at 09:08:29AM +0200, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: > On Fri, Oct 09, 2020 at 09:53:58PM +0200, Pavel Raiskup wrote: > > On Friday, October 9, 2020 4:59:32 PM CEST Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: > > > - dturecek has no corresponding bugzilla account - First notificat

Re: Unresponsive packagers: wolnei and dturecek

2020-10-10 Thread Pierre-Yves Chibon
On Fri, Oct 09, 2020 at 09:53:58PM +0200, Pavel Raiskup wrote: > On Friday, October 9, 2020 4:59:32 PM CEST Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: > > - dturecek has no corresponding bugzilla account - First notification Oct > > 1st > > Dominik left Red Hat ~10 days ago, so he probably l

Unresponsive packagers: wolnei and dturecek

2020-10-09 Thread Pierre-Yves Chibon
Good Morning Everyone, The following two accounts do not have a valid bugzilla account associated with their email in FAS. They have received a daily notification about it (and thus so have we) and so far in vain. - wolnei has no corresponding bugzilla account - First notification Sept 29th

Re: EPEL8 Branch Request: perl-Data-GUID

2020-10-08 Thread Pierre-Yves Chibon
On Thu, Oct 08, 2020 at 03:27:22PM +0200, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: > On Thu, Oct 08, 2020 at 03:22:46PM +0200, Emmanuel Seyman wrote: > > > > Hello, all. > > > > Ralf Corsepius has requested that someone give Paul Howarth and Jitka > > Plesnikova collaborator r

Re: EPEL8 Branch Request: perl-Data-GUID

2020-10-08 Thread Pierre-Yves Chibon
On Thu, Oct 08, 2020 at 03:22:46PM +0200, Emmanuel Seyman wrote: > > Hello, all. > > Ralf Corsepius has requested that someone give Paul Howarth and Jitka > Plesnikova collaborator rights in bug #1870755 . Their FAS usernames > are pghmcfc and jplesnik respectively. > > Is there someone on the

Re: Unresponsive packagers: ekulik, imcleod and lsun

2020-10-04 Thread Pierre-Yves Chibon
On Sat, Oct 03, 2020 at 04:04:46AM -, Liming Sun wrote: > Apology for the late reply. I had email issues from upstream community > recently. Somehow my Redhat Bugzilla account seems not accessible anymore > either. I recreated the account with the same email address > (l...@mellanox.com).

Re: Planned Outage - pagure.io - 2020-10-01 08:00 UTC

2020-10-01 Thread Pierre-Yves Chibon
On Thu, Oct 01, 2020 at 11:27:08AM +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote: > On 30. 09. 20 9:38, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: > > We are moving the service to a new server running RHEL8 and python3. > > I don't understand why you do this. It worked just fine on Python 2! It did and now it works f

Re: Packages in rawhide not showing in src.fedoraproject.org

2020-09-30 Thread Pierre-Yves Chibon
On Wed, Sep 30, 2020 at 02:15:34PM +0100, José Abílio Matos wrote: > On Wednesday, September 30, 2020 1:19:51 PM WEST Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: > > It actually queries bodhi and failing to find things in it, it fallsback to > > mdapi normally. > > Potential bug in the logic?

Re: Packages in rawhide not showing in src.fedoraproject.org

2020-09-30 Thread Pierre-Yves Chibon
On Wed, Sep 30, 2020 at 01:39:15PM +0200, Fabio Valentini wrote: > On Wed, Sep 30, 2020 at 12:55 PM José Abílio Matos wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > I am sorry if this has been discussed before but I do not remember it. > > > > > > The culprit to this message was the review of R-pak > > > >

Planned Outage - pagure.io - 2020-10-01 08:00 UTC

2020-09-30 Thread Pierre-Yves Chibon
There will be an outage starting at 2020-10-01 08:00 UTC, which will last approximately 4 hours. To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UTCHowto or run: date -d '2020-10-01 08:00 UTC' Reason for outage: We are moving the service to a new

Planned Outage - pagure.io - 2020-10-01 08:00 UTC

2020-09-30 Thread Pierre-Yves Chibon
There will be an outage starting at 2020-10-01 08:00 UTC, which will last approximately 4 hours. To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UTCHowto or run: date -d '2020-10-01 08:00 UTC' Reason for outage: We are moving the service to a new

Re: Proposal: drop extras-qa from all fedora bugs

2020-09-29 Thread Pierre-Yves Chibon
On Tue, Sep 29, 2020 at 09:30:45AM -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > Since time began (Fedora 7), all fedora bugs in bugzilla have had their > "QA Contact" field set to: extras...@fedoraproject.org. > > Bugzilla describes "QA Contact" as: > > "The person responsible for confirming this bug if it is

Re: Unresponsive packagers: ekulik, imcleod and lsun

2020-09-22 Thread Pierre-Yves Chibon
On Wed, Sep 16, 2020 at 05:26:48PM +0200, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: > Good Morning Everyone, > > Since September 5th, we have been emailing daily the following users to notify > that the email they have set in FAS does not correspond to a valid bugzilla > account. > Thi

Re: Unresponsive packagers: ekulik, imcleod and lsun

2020-09-17 Thread Pierre-Yves Chibon
On Thu, Sep 17, 2020 at 03:57:42PM -, Ernestas Kulik wrote: > You can contact me via the email address you’re spamming, I’m ignoring only > those automated warnings, not everything. The email we're sending is coming from ad...@fedoraproject.org which will reach the Fedora admins if you reply

Unresponsive packagers: ekulik, imcleod and lsun

2020-09-16 Thread Pierre-Yves Chibon
Good Morning Everyone, Since September 5th, we have been emailing daily the following users to notify that the email they have set in FAS does not correspond to a valid bugzilla account. This is a requirement for Fedora packagers. Does someone know how to contact these people? ekulik is main

Re: [EPEL-devel] Proposing an EPEL packaging SIG

2020-09-15 Thread Pierre-Yves Chibon
On Mon, Sep 14, 2020 at 08:54:57AM -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > On Fri, Sep 11, 2020 at 11:52:03AM -0700, Michel Alexandre Salim wrote: > > There are several changes we can make to both streamline the process, > > and not increase the maintenance burden on the (other) maintainers of > > these

Re: Proposing an EPEL packaging SIG

2020-09-14 Thread Pierre-Yves Chibon
On Mon, Sep 14, 2020 at 10:35:18AM +0200, Vít Ondruch wrote: > > Dne 14. 09. 20 v 10:11 Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek napsal(a): > > On Mon, Sep 14, 2020 at 09:50:45AM +0200, Vít Ondruch wrote: > >> Reading this proposal and with the EPEL8 experience, where there was not > >> even wiki page, where

Re: Gitlab Ask Me Anything - Sept 10th, 13:30 UTC

2020-09-09 Thread Pierre-Yves Chibon
On Fri, Sep 04, 2020 at 04:27:55PM +0100, Aoife Moloney wrote: > Good Morning folks, > > As you likely remember, a little while ago now, was announced the decision to > move dist-git to a gitlab instance. This decision was the results of different > factors which included a wish for Red Hat to

Re: About the Future of Communishift

2020-09-04 Thread Pierre-Yves Chibon
On Fri, Sep 04, 2020 at 01:47:58PM +0200, Tomasz Torcz wrote: > On Fri, Sep 04, 2020 at 07:16:02AM -0400, Neal Gompa wrote: > > On Fri, Sep 4, 2020 at 7:10 AM clime wrote: > > > > > > On Fri, 4 Sep 2020 at 12:59, clime wrote: > > > > > > > > On Fri, 4 Sep 2020 at 12:48, Aoife Moloney wrote: > >

Re: mdapi.fedoraproject.org data not up to date?

2020-08-31 Thread Pierre-Yves Chibon
On Mon, Aug 31, 2020 at 05:43:14PM +0200, Robert-André Mauchin wrote: > Hello, > > I am trying to retrieve versioning information for some packages through > mdapi.fedoraproject.org. But several "recent" (some two/three months ago) > packages are returning a 404 error as if they don't exist. >

Re: Non-responsive maintainer: mstuchli

2020-08-21 Thread Pierre-Yves Chibon
! Pierre >Cheers, >Matt >On Fri 21 Aug 2020 at 10:38, Pierre-Yves Chibon <[1]pin...@pingoured.fr> >wrote: > > Good Morning Everyone, > > While working on cleaning up the errors encountered when syncing default > > assignee

Non-responsive maintainer: mstuchli

2020-08-21 Thread Pierre-Yves Chibon
Good Morning Everyone, While working on cleaning up the errors encountered when syncing default assignee and CC list from dist-git to bugzilla, I ran into the user mstuchli. The email address set in FAS does not seem to correspond to a valid bugzilla account. fedora_active_user indicates that

Re: What is the real value of Release and %changelog metadata?

2020-08-19 Thread Pierre-Yves Chibon
On Wed, Aug 19, 2020 at 04:30:18PM +0200, Nils Philippsen wrote: > On Wed, 2020-08-19 at 10:46 +0200, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: > > On Thu, Aug 13, 2020 at 03:08:50PM +0200, Pavel Raiskup wrote: > > > Release tag problem/proposal > > > > &

Removing co-maintainers from retired packages

2020-08-19 Thread Pierre-Yves Chibon
Good Morning Everyone, A little while ago we were asked to remove all the co-maintainers from retired packages [1]. This was brought to the devel list for discussion in [2] and then to FESCo for a final decision [3]. As a result, after orphaning the retired packages (cf [4]), we will be removing

Re: What is the real value of Release and %changelog metadata?

2020-08-19 Thread Pierre-Yves Chibon
On Thu, Aug 13, 2020 at 03:08:50PM +0200, Pavel Raiskup wrote: > Questionnaire right at the beginning, so if you tl;dr, you don't miss it: > > https://forms.gle/Jgr13vtRkiUwLb6W6 > > This is no change proposal but rather a result of my long-term curiosity > around the $Subject problem. I

Planned Outage - Blockerbugs - 2020-08-18 17:00 UTC

2020-08-18 Thread Pierre-Yves Chibon
There will be an outage starting at 2020-08-18 17:00UTC, which will last approximately 3 hours. To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UTCHowto or run: date -d '2020-08-18 17:00UTC' Reason for outage: Blockerbugs host VM upgrade from EL7

Re: http response to fedpkg build failure?

2020-08-06 Thread Pierre-Yves Chibon
On Thu, Aug 06, 2020 at 06:46:12AM -0500, Richard Shaw wrote: >This is a new one for me: >$ fedpkg build The key line is this one:         Sorry!  This service is currently unavailable. Looks like you've hit koji at a time of an outage. We had a vpn issue earlier today where

Non responsive packager: svahl

2020-08-03 Thread Pierre-Yves Chibon
Good Morning Everyone, I have been trying to contact packagers without a proper bugzilla account associated with their FAS email for a while now. The first email to devel-announce is from June 13th [1]. This is a requirement for packagers which is mentioned at:

Re: Non responsive packager: usercont

2020-08-03 Thread Pierre-Yves Chibon
nto that. > František > On Mon, Jul 27, 2020 at 10:44 AM Pierre-Yves Chibon > <[4]pin...@pingoured.fr> wrote: > >Good Morning Everyone, > >I have been trying to contact packagers without a proper bugzilla >account >asso

Re: Over 1000 (retired) packages orphaned

2020-07-28 Thread Pierre-Yves Chibon
On Tue, Jul 28, 2020 at 11:53:21AM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > I went through this list ... > > On Mon, Jul 27, 2020 at 10:10:36PM +0200, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: > > Orphaning rpms/jbuilder from tc01 > > Right, this was renamed "dune", so this should be

Re: Non responsive packager: mildew

2020-07-28 Thread Pierre-Yves Chibon
e and mildew is the main admin on all of them. So it may actually be better if the packages are orphaned and you take over from mildew right after it. Pierre >On Mon, Jul 27, 2020 at 10:42 AM Pierre-Yves Chibon ><[2]pin...@pingoured.fr> wrote: > > Good Morning Everyone

Over 1000 (retired) packages orphaned

2020-07-27 Thread Pierre-Yves Chibon
Good Morning Everyone, In the spirit of cleaning a little bit the information in dist-git, I have been orphaning a little more than 1000 packages that were retired on all of their branches recorded in PDC. This has two potential small consequences: - If you monitor the number of packages you

Re: Non responsive packager: mmahut

2020-07-27 Thread Pierre-Yves Chibon
On Mon, Jul 27, 2020 at 03:46:17PM +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote: > On 27. 07. 20 15:42, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: > > On Mon, Jul 27, 2020 at 03:33:19PM +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote: > > > On 27. 07. 20 10:39, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: > > > > Good Morning Everyone, >

Re: Non responsive packager: mmahut

2020-07-27 Thread Pierre-Yves Chibon
On Mon, Jul 27, 2020 at 03:33:19PM +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote: > On 27. 07. 20 10:39, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: > > Good Morning Everyone, > > > > I have been trying to contact packagers without a proper bugzilla account > > associated with their FAS email for a

Re: Non responsive packager: amitshah

2020-07-27 Thread Pierre-Yves Chibon
On Mon, Jul 27, 2020 at 10:01:00AM +0100, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote: > On Mon, Jul 27, 2020 at 10:36:48AM +0200, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: > > Good Morning Everyone, > > > > I have been trying to contact packagers without a proper bugzilla account > > associated with

Re: Non responsive packager: amitshah

2020-07-27 Thread Pierre-Yves Chibon
On Mon, Jul 27, 2020 at 10:52:34AM +0200, Hans de Goede wrote: > Hi, > > On 7/27/20 10:36 AM, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: > > Good Morning Everyone, > > > > I have been trying to contact packagers without a proper bugzilla account > > associated with their FAS

Non responsive packager: usercont

2020-07-27 Thread Pierre-Yves Chibon
Good Morning Everyone, I have been trying to contact packagers without a proper bugzilla account associated with their FAS email for a while now. The first email to devel-announce is from June 13th [1]. This is a requirement for packagers which is mentioned at:

Non responsive packager: tstclair

2020-07-27 Thread Pierre-Yves Chibon
Good Morning Everyone, I have been trying to contact packagers without a proper bugzilla account associated with their FAS email for a while now. The first email to devel-announce is from June 13th [1]. This is a requirement for packagers which is mentioned at:

Non responsive packager: sspreitz

2020-07-27 Thread Pierre-Yves Chibon
Good Morning Everyone, I have been trying to contact packagers without a proper bugzilla account associated with their FAS email for a while now. The first email to devel-announce is from June 13th [1]. This is a requirement for packagers which is mentioned at:

Non responsive packager: romal

2020-07-27 Thread Pierre-Yves Chibon
Good Morning Everyone, I have been trying to contact packagers without a proper bugzilla account associated with their FAS email for a while now. The first email to devel-announce is from June 13th [1]. This is a requirement for packagers which is mentioned at:

Non responsive packager: rspanton

2020-07-27 Thread Pierre-Yves Chibon
Good Morning Everyone, I have been trying to contact packagers without a proper bugzilla account associated with their FAS email for a while now. The first email to devel-announce is from June 13th [1]. This is a requirement for packagers which is mentioned at:

Non responsive packager: robled

2020-07-27 Thread Pierre-Yves Chibon
Good Morning Everyone, I have been trying to contact packagers without a proper bugzilla account associated with their FAS email for a while now. The first email to devel-announce is from June 13th [1]. This is a requirement for packagers which is mentioned at:

Non responsive packager: nguzman

2020-07-27 Thread Pierre-Yves Chibon
Good Morning Everyone, I have been trying to contact packagers without a proper bugzilla account associated with their FAS email for a while now. The first email to devel-announce is from June 13th [1]. This is a requirement for packagers which is mentioned at:

Non responsive packager: rfairley

2020-07-27 Thread Pierre-Yves Chibon
Good Morning Everyone, I have been trying to contact packagers without a proper bugzilla account associated with their FAS email for a while now. The first email to devel-announce is from June 13th [1]. This is a requirement for packagers which is mentioned at:

Non responsive packager: mmahut

2020-07-27 Thread Pierre-Yves Chibon
Good Morning Everyone, I have been trying to contact packagers without a proper bugzilla account associated with their FAS email for a while now. The first email to devel-announce is from June 13th [1]. This is a requirement for packagers which is mentioned at:

Non responsive packager: mildew

2020-07-27 Thread Pierre-Yves Chibon
Good Morning Everyone, I have been trying to contact packagers without a proper bugzilla account associated with their FAS email for a while now. The first email to devel-announce is from June 13th [1]. This is a requirement for packagers which is mentioned at:

Non responsive packager: mhabrnal

2020-07-27 Thread Pierre-Yves Chibon
Good Morning Everyone, I have been trying to contact packagers without a proper bugzilla account associated with their FAS email for a while now. The first email to devel-announce is from June 13th [1]. This is a requirement for packagers which is mentioned at:

Non responsive packager: ggillies

2020-07-27 Thread Pierre-Yves Chibon
Good Morning Everyone, I have been trying to contact packagers without a proper bugzilla account associated with their FAS email for a while now. The first email to devel-announce is from June 13th [1]. This is a requirement for packagers which is mentioned at:

Non responsive packager: luismartingil

2020-07-27 Thread Pierre-Yves Chibon
Good Morning Everyone, I have been trying to contact packagers without a proper bugzilla account associated with their FAS email for a while now. The first email to devel-announce is from June 13th [1]. This is a requirement for packagers which is mentioned at:

Non responsive packager: mbartos

2020-07-27 Thread Pierre-Yves Chibon
Good Morning Everyone, I have been trying to contact packagers without a proper bugzilla account associated with their FAS email for a while now. The first email to devel-announce is from June 13th [1]. This is a requirement for packagers which is mentioned at:

Non responsive packager: avesh

2020-07-27 Thread Pierre-Yves Chibon
Good Morning Everyone, I have been trying to contact packagers without a proper bugzilla account associated with their FAS email for a while now. The first email to devel-announce is from June 13th [1]. This is a requirement for packagers which is mentioned at:

Non responsive packager: andreyma

2020-07-27 Thread Pierre-Yves Chibon
Good Morning Everyone, I have been trying to contact packagers without a proper bugzilla account associated with their FAS email for a while now. The first email to devel-announce is from June 13th [1]. This is a requirement for packagers which is mentioned at:

Non responsive packager: amitshah

2020-07-27 Thread Pierre-Yves Chibon
Good Morning Everyone, I have been trying to contact packagers without a proper bugzilla account associated with their FAS email for a while now. The first email to devel-announce is from June 13th [1]. This is a requirement for packagers which is mentioned at:

Non responsive packager: affix

2020-07-27 Thread Pierre-Yves Chibon
Good Morning Everyone, I have been trying to contact packagers without a proper bugzilla account associated with their FAS email for a while now. The first email to devel-announce is from June 13th [1]. This is a requirement for packagers which is mentioned at:

Re: Branch creation for unretired package

2020-07-23 Thread Pierre-Yves Chibon
On Thu, Jul 23, 2020 at 10:20:45AM +0200, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: > On Wed, Jul 22, 2020 at 10:12:58PM +0200, Mohamed El Morabity wrote: > > Hello, > > > > I'm the maintainer of the nicotine+ package. This package was retired > > before F32 branching last year (no Py

Re: Branch creation for unretired package

2020-07-23 Thread Pierre-Yves Chibon
On Wed, Jul 22, 2020 at 10:12:58PM +0200, Mohamed El Morabity wrote: > Hello, > > I'm the maintainer of the nicotine+ package. This package was retired > before F32 branching last year (no Python 3 support at this time) and > I unretired it after a review request and a unretirement request >

Re: [Fedora-packaging] Re: RPM-level auto release and changelog bumping - Fedora 33 System-Wide Change proposal

2020-07-15 Thread Pierre-Yves Chibon
On Fri, Jul 03, 2020 at 11:11:30AM +0200, Nicolas Mailhot via devel wrote: > Le vendredi 03 juillet 2020 à 09:48 +0200, Pierre-Yves Chibon a écrit : > > On Thu, Jul 02, 2020 at 12:10:58PM +0200, Björn Persson wrote: > > > Nicolas Mailhot wrote: > > > > The same pr

Re: Using "rawhide" for the dist-git branch for Fedora Rawhide

2020-07-08 Thread Pierre-Yves Chibon
On Wed, Jul 08, 2020 at 10:09:35AM -0400, Kaleb Keithley wrote: >Whatever name is picked: devel, main, rawhide, next, etc.,  how about >setting the default branch. >E.g. `git symbolic-ref HEAD refs/heads/rawhide` >This way when someone clones the repo they don't need to know or

Re: Packagers with no corresponding valid bugzilla accounts

2020-07-08 Thread Pierre-Yves Chibon
On Tue, Jul 07, 2020 at 10:38:01AM -0700, Michel Alexandre Salim wrote: > On Tue, 2020-07-07 at 10:30 +0200, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: > > On Tue, Jul 07, 2020 at 08:17:00AM +, Mattia Verga wrote: > > > Il 06/07/20 22:04, Pierre-Yves Chibon ha scritto: > > &

Re: Packagers with no corresponding valid bugzilla accounts

2020-07-07 Thread Pierre-Yves Chibon
On Tue, Jul 07, 2020 at 10:30:02AM +0200, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: > On Tue, Jul 07, 2020 at 08:17:00AM +, Mattia Verga wrote: > > Il 06/07/20 22:04, Pierre-Yves Chibon ha scritto: > > > > > > Good Morning Everyone, > > > > > > The list

Re: Packagers with no corresponding valid bugzilla accounts

2020-07-07 Thread Pierre-Yves Chibon
On Tue, Jul 07, 2020 at 08:17:00AM +, Mattia Verga wrote: > Il 06/07/20 22:04, Pierre-Yves Chibon ha scritto: > > > > Good Morning Everyone, > > > > The list is slowly going down, we have now 38 accounts that are still > > problematic, they have all rece

Re: Packagers with no corresponding valid bugzilla accounts

2020-07-06 Thread Pierre-Yves Chibon
On Thu, Jun 25, 2020 at 02:55:50PM +0200, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: > On Sat, Jun 13, 2020 at 10:10:36PM +0200, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: > > Good Morning Everyone, > > > > If you are a packagers or are watching tickets on dist-git (ie: asked to be > > cc'ed on tick

Re: Packagers with no corresponding valid bugzilla accounts

2020-07-06 Thread Pierre-Yves Chibon
On Thu, Jun 25, 2020 at 02:55:50PM +0200, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: > On Sat, Jun 13, 2020 at 10:10:36PM +0200, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: > > Good Morning Everyone, > > > > If you are a packagers or are watching tickets on dist-git (ie: asked to be > > cc'ed on tick

Re: [Fedora-packaging] RPM-level auto release and changelog bumping - Fedora 33 System-Wide Change proposal

2020-07-03 Thread Pierre-Yves Chibon
On Thu, Jul 02, 2020 at 03:44:51PM +0200, Nicolas Mailhot via devel wrote: > Le 2020-07-02 15:11, Kamil Dudka a écrit : > >On Thursday, July 2, 2020 1:02:05 PM CEST Nicolas Mailhot via > >devel wrote: > >>If there is buy-in, it will be implemented by goodwill people. > >>If there > >>is no buy-in,

Re: [Fedora-packaging] Re: RPM-level auto release and changelog bumping - Fedora 33 System-Wide Change proposal

2020-07-03 Thread Pierre-Yves Chibon
On Thu, Jul 02, 2020 at 12:10:58PM +0200, Björn Persson wrote: > Nicolas Mailhot wrote: > > The same process that commits a new state of the changelog file in > > sources, > > commits the date that was written in the changelog in a separate key = > > value > > file (with the components of the

Re: Remove me as comaintainer/commiter - orphaning packages

2020-06-29 Thread Pierre-Yves Chibon
On Sun, Jun 28, 2020 at 03:39:34PM +0200, Johan Cwiklinski wrote: > Hello, > > I'm going to stop packaging, so I've orphaned the following packages I > was "maintaining": > - iipsrv > - glpi > - php-elvanto-litemoji > - php-IDNA_Convert > - php-markdown > - php-scssphp-scssphp > - php-simplepie >

Re: Need help to contact: digimer mbartos, ignotusp

2020-06-25 Thread Pierre-Yves Chibon
Pierre > On 2020-06-25 9:08 a.m., Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: > > Good Morning Everyone, > > > > As announced on devel-announce [1] I have sent an email to each account > > listed > > on dist-git to be either point of contact or included in the CC list

Need help to contact: digimer mbartos, ignotusp

2020-06-25 Thread Pierre-Yves Chibon
Good Morning Everyone, As announced on devel-announce [1] I have sent an email to each account listed on dist-git to be either point of contact or included in the CC list of tickets opened on bugzilla. The following emails to the following account came back with and error: - digimer (error:

Re: Packagers with no corresponding valid bugzilla accounts

2020-06-25 Thread Pierre-Yves Chibon
On Sat, Jun 13, 2020 at 10:10:36PM +0200, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: > Good Morning Everyone, > > If you are a packagers or are watching tickets on dist-git (ie: asked to be > cc'ed on tickets on bugzilla for a given package), you must have a valid > bugzilla account associated

Re: Packagers with no corresponding valid bugzilla accounts

2020-06-25 Thread Pierre-Yves Chibon
On Sat, Jun 13, 2020 at 10:10:36PM +0200, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: > Good Morning Everyone, > > If you are a packagers or are watching tickets on dist-git (ie: asked to be > cc'ed on tickets on bugzilla for a given package), you must have a valid > bugzilla account associated

Re: RHEL 9 and modularity

2020-06-23 Thread Pierre-Yves Chibon
On Tue, Jun 23, 2020 at 08:30:37AM -0400, Josh Boyer wrote: > On Tue, Jun 23, 2020 at 8:01 AM Miro Hrončok wrote: > > > > On 22. 06. 20 21:36, Josh Boyer wrote: > > >> I'd like to ask whether RHEL 9 has decided for default modular streams > > >> despite > > >> their failure in Fedora, whether

Re: Packagers with no corresponding valid bugzilla accounts

2020-06-17 Thread Pierre-Yves Chibon
On Tue, Jun 16, 2020 at 05:15:17PM -0400, Christopher wrote: > On Tue, Jun 16, 2020 at 11:10 AM Pierre-Yves Chibon > wrote: > > > > On Tue, Jun 16, 2020 at 11:05:00AM -0400, Christopher wrote: > > >Why aren't the packager accounts linked to their FAS ac

Re: Packagers with no corresponding valid bugzilla accounts

2020-06-16 Thread Pierre-Yves Chibon
On Tue, Jun 16, 2020 at 11:05:00AM -0400, Christopher wrote: >Why aren't the packager accounts linked to their FAS account alias? >[1]fa...@fedoraproject.org ? I've been annoyed by FAS-linked services >trying to use my forwarding address for my account id rather than my FAS >user

Re: Packagers with no corresponding valid bugzilla accounts

2020-06-14 Thread Pierre-Yves Chibon
On Sun, Jun 14, 2020 at 07:09:57PM +0200, Felix Schwarz wrote: > > Am 13.06.20 um 22:10 schrieb Pierre-Yves Chibon: > > bpereto > > Benjamin was a previous maintainer of borgbackup. After the Python 3.9 rebuild > I noticed that a new ticket was still assigned to him [1]. I

Re: Packagers with no corresponding valid bugzilla accounts

2020-06-14 Thread Pierre-Yves Chibon
On Sun, Jun 14, 2020 at 08:10:11AM +0200, Jan Kratochvil wrote: > On Sat, 13 Jun 2020 22:10:36 +0200, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: > > jkratoch > > This account is set as "inactive" in FAS. Couldn't you regenerate this list > with inactive accounts excluded? > &g

Packagers with no corresponding valid bugzilla accounts

2020-06-13 Thread Pierre-Yves Chibon
Good Morning Everyone, If you are a packagers or are watching tickets on dist-git (ie: asked to be cc'ed on tickets on bugzilla for a given package), you must have a valid bugzilla account associated with the email address you have set in FAS. There are currently 66 users and groups who do not

Packagers with no corresponding valid bugzilla accounts

2020-06-13 Thread Pierre-Yves Chibon
Good Morning Everyone, If you are a packagers or are watching tickets on dist-git (ie: asked to be cc'ed on tickets on bugzilla for a given package), you must have a valid bugzilla account associated with the email address you have set in FAS. There are currently 66 users and groups who do not

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >