On 20 April 2012 07:34, Toshio Kuratomi a.bad...@gmail.com wrote:
Originally we considered having three questions:
* keep release naming the way it is.
* Keep release names but change the process.
* Discard release names altogether.
I would go for the third option. I dont' find Fedora or
2012/3/5 Michał Piotrowski mkkp...@gmail.com:
So I grepped /etc for GRUB_CMDLINE_LINUX.
I found file:
/etc/default/grub
Why /etc/default dir is used instead of /etc/sysconfig? To be honest -
it's not really user friendly from long time RH Linux user POV.
I run Grub2 from upstream and the
On 10 April 2011 20:01, Doug Ledford dledf...@redhat.com wrote:
The bug I'm looking at right now is specifically against the live image, so
no I can't test that with something in updates testing. It needs to make it
to the base before it gets on the live media to see if it solves the problem
On 6 October 2010 23:25, Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com wrote:
This isn't generally how we do things. We encourage people to mark bugs
as blockers; this constitutes *nominating* the bug as a blocker, it
makes it pop up for review at a blocker review meeting. We then usually
determine
On 26 September 2010 09:25, Piscium grok...@gmail.com wrote:
My question is this: what should be the name of the configuration file
for Intel 32 bits architecture?
config-x86 or
config-i386 or
config-i686 or
one of the above followed by -generic?
My custom kernel seems to be running
This question is addressed at those with kernel building experience.
The Fedora wiki has instructions on building a custom kernel:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Docs/CustomKernel
That's good, thanks.
Let's say that someone would like to build a kernel with different
configuration options. He or
2010/9/19 Michał Piotrowski mkkp...@gmail.com:
Here is a workaround
sudo rpm -e --nodeps upstart-sysvinit
sudo yum install systemd-sysvinit
sudo yum upgrade --skip-broken
I installed rawhide yesterday. I solved this issue with a different
method: yum shell. Basically you enter the commands
Some people like everything up-to-date, while others are more
conservative. Fine. Isn't there a middle ground?
Currently there are these repos: updates and updates_testing.
Maybe two more repos could be added: updates_fixes and updates_enhancements.
After a package stays for a while in
On 29 August 2010 21:15, Kevin Fenzi ke...@scrye.com wrote:
On Sun, 29 Aug 2010 10:38:29 +0100
Piscium grok...@gmail.com wrote:
Please do join in the design team and help them out:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Join_the_Design_Team
While I appreciate the arts, I am not good at creating
Over the last few days there seems to be a bit of existential angst
about Fedora. So here are my random thoughts.
About Fedora disappearing if Red Hat is bought by some evil
corporation, for example Microsoft. :-) I am not worried. As it has
been pointed out, all the Fedora packages as well as
It seems to me that it is mostly sysadmins that are concerned about
systemd. That is understandable, they are the group of users that will
be most affected by the new paradigm, and will have to learn new
tricks.
Yet sysadmins are just a section of the Fedora users. For example,
people that like
2010/8/23 Miloslav Trmač m...@volny.cz:
If non-sysadmins will hardly notice the new init system, shouldn't the
sysadmins, who will notice, be the primary consideration?
Mirek
Not IMO. Sysadmins are just one group of stakeholders. My intervention
was just to put things in perspective.
However
On 25 July 2010 07:34, Kevin Fenzi ke...@scrye.com wrote:
Greetings.
first it seems that systemd-sysvinit needs to add a:
Provides: sysvinit-userspace
To avoid the current conflicts/upgrade problems:
--- Package upstart-sysvinit.x86_64 0:0.6.5-7.fc14 set to be installed
-- Processing
13 matches
Mail list logo
