Hello,
thanks to the Copr's new ability to upload SRPMs directly, we have improved
DNF's continuous integration process a lot. If you are interested in how we do
that or if you would like to use/test our nightly builds [1], take a look at
http://dnf.baseurl.org/2015/09/21/ci-moved-to-copr/ or j
- Original Message -
> From: "Kevin Kofler"
> To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Sent: Friday, July 31, 2015 2:56:48 AM
> Subject: Re: gross DNF bandwidth inefficiency if filesystem space limited
>
> Radek Holy wrote:
> > Known, https://bugzilla.
- Original Message -
> From: "Felix Miata"
> To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Sent: Thursday, July 30, 2015 9:21:19 AM
> Subject: gross DNF bandwidth inefficiency if filesystem space limited
>
> # dnf upgrade
> (dnf nearly exhausts freespace downloading all packages before installing a
- Original Message -
> From: "Stephen Gallagher"
> To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Cc: rel-...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Sent: Friday, July 10, 2015 2:05:24 PM
> Subject: RPM Weak Dependencies and the install media compose process
>
> (Please keep the conversation on the devel list;
- Original Message -
> From: "Radek Holy"
> To: "Development discussions related to Fedora"
>
> Cc: ndbeck...@gmail.com
> Sent: Tuesday, June 23, 2015 5:47:10 PM
> Subject: Re: need rpm help (nothing provides /bin/python)
>
>
>
&g
- Original Message -
> From: "Michael Šimáček"
> To: "Development discussions related to Fedora"
> , ndbeck...@gmail.com
> Sent: Tuesday, June 23, 2015 3:58:49 PM
> Subject: Re: need rpm help (nothing provides /bin/python)
>
> On 2015-06-23 13:21, Neal Becker wrote:
> > I updated mercu
5:09 +0200, Kalev Lember wrote:
> > On 06/12/2015 10:28 AM, Radek Holy wrote:
> > > If a package "Requires: foo" and both "bar" and "barbaz" "Provides:
> > > foo", they are handled as being equally suitable. DNF/libsolv is not
> &g
- Original Message -
> From: "Dennis Jacobfeuerborn"
> To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Sent: Saturday, June 13, 2015 12:30:39 PM
> Subject: Re: DNF vs YUM, $pkg, $pkg-mpi, $pkg-openmpi having same provides
>
> On 12.06.2015 15:25, Radek Holy wrote:
- Original Message -
> From: "Kalev Lember"
> To: "Development discussions related to Fedora"
>
> Sent: Friday, June 12, 2015 3:09:50 PM
> Subject: Re: DNF vs YUM, $pkg, $pkg-mpi, $pkg-openmpi having same provides
>
> On 06/12/2015 10:
not installing the right kernel-devel
> package)
> On Fri, Jun 12, 2015 at 8:40 AM, Radek Holy < rh...@redhat.com > wrote:
> > - Original Message -
>
> > > From: "Thorsten Leemhuis" < fed...@leemhuis.info >
>
> > > To: "Developme
- Original Message -
> From: "Thorsten Leemhuis"
> To: "Development discussions related to Fedora"
>
> Sent: Friday, June 12, 2015 2:19:10 PM
> Subject: Can soft dependencies help to get the proper kernel-devel packages?
> (Was: Soft- Re: DKMS is not installing
> the right kernel-dev
- Original Message -
> From: "Sandro Mani"
> To: "Development discussions related to Fedora"
>
> Sent: Friday, June 12, 2015 10:40:40 AM
> Subject: Re: DNF vs YUM, $pkg, $pkg-mpi, $pkg-openmpi having same provides
> On 12.06.2015 10:28, Radek H
- Original Message -
> From: "Sandro Mani"
> To: "Development discussions related to Fedora"
>
> Sent: Thursday, June 11, 2015 6:01:12 PM
> Subject: DNF vs YUM, $pkg, $pkg-mpi, $pkg-openmpi having same provides
> Hello,
> Investigating bug #1230838, I noticed that when installing mmg3d
- Original Message -
> From: "Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek"
> To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Sent: Wednesday, June 10, 2015 10:05:41 PM
> Subject: Re: F23 System Wide Change: Python 3 as Default
>
> On Wed, Jun 10, 2015 at 08:50:14AM -0400, Jan Kurik wrote:
> > = Proposed System Wid
- Original Message -
> From: "Radek Holy"
> To: "Development discussions related to Fedora"
>
> Sent: Wednesday, May 6, 2015 5:24:52 PM
> Subject: Re: dnf woes
>
> - Original Message -
> > From: "Philip Rhoades"
> >
- Original Message -
> From: "Philip Rhoades"
> To: "Development discussions related to Fedora"
>
> Sent: Wednesday, May 6, 2015 4:31:46 PM
> Subject: dnf woes
>
> People,
>
> I have been watching the dnf arguments over the last year or so with a
> little interest but now I am exposed
- Original Message -
> From: "Martin Sourada"
> To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Sent: Saturday, April 25, 2015 8:57:19 AM
> Subject: Re: dnf interactive config file updates
>
> V Mon, 13 Apr 2015 21:20:49 +0100
> "Richard W.M. Jones" napsáno:
>
> > On Mon, Apr 13, 2015 at 02:17:14
- Original Message -
> From: "Pádraig Brady"
> To: "Development discussions related to Fedora"
>
> Sent: Friday, April 24, 2015 11:58:53 AM
> Subject: Re: dnf caches
>
> On 24/04/15 10:40, Radek Holy wrote:
> > - Original Me
- Original Message -
> From: "Pádraig Brady"
> To: "Development discussions related to Fedora"
>
> Sent: Thursday, April 23, 2015 8:11:45 PM
> Subject: Re: dnf caches
>
> On 23/04/15 18:44, drago01 wrote:
> > On Thu, Apr 23, 2015 at 7:07 PM, Pádraig Brady wrote:
> >> My Fedora 22 syste
- Original Message -
> From: "Pete Travis"
> To: "Development discussions related to Fedora"
>
> Sent: Tuesday, April 14, 2015 5:18:15 PM
> Subject: Re: dnf replacing yum and dnf-yum
> On Apr 13, 2015 5:07 AM, &
- Original Message -
> From: "Rave it"
> To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Sent: Tuesday, April 14, 2015 12:45:41 PM
> Subject: Re: dnf replacing yum and dnf-yum
>
> > Message: 13
> > Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2015 03:35:50 +0200
> > From: Kevin Kofler
> > To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> >
- Original Message -
> From: "Kevin Fenzi"
> To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Sent: Monday, April 13, 2015 5:01:45 PM
> Subject: Re: dnf interactive config file updates
>
> On Mon, 13 Apr 2015 15:45:41 +0100
> "Richard W.M. Jones" wrote:
>
> >
> > I see that dnf has sprung apt-sty
- Original Message -
> From: "Pete Travis"
> To: "Development discussions related to Fedora"
>
> Sent: Friday, April 10, 2015 5:31:08 PM
> Subject: Re: dnf replacing yum and dnf-yum
> On Apr 10, 2015 4:39 AM, "Radek Holy" < rh...@r
- Original Message -
> From: "Przemek Klosowski"
> To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Sent: Thursday, April 9, 2015 5:01:19 PM
> Subject: Re: dnf replacing yum and dnf-yum
> On 04/08/2015 02:32 AM, Jan Zelený wrote
> > I'm afraid not. From the very beginning, we were sending a clear me
- Original Message -
> From: "Przemek Klosowski"
> To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Sent: Thursday, April 9, 2015 5:13:49 PM
> Subject: Re: dnf replacing yum and dnf-yum
> On 04/09/2015 11:05 AM, Michal Luscon wrote:
> > On 04/09/2015 05:01 PM, Przemek Klosowski wrote:
>
> > > Usin
- Original Message -
> From: "Bruno Wolff III"
> To: "Radek Holy"
> Cc: "Development discussions related to Fedora"
>
> Sent: Wednesday, April 8, 2015 5:03:46 PM
> Subject: Re: dnf replacing yum and dnf-yum
>
> On Wed,
- Original Message -
> From: "Bruno Wolff III"
> To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Sent: Tuesday, April 7, 2015 5:51:41 PM
> Subject: Re: dnf replacing yum and dnf-yum
>
> On Tue, Apr 07, 2015 at 09:07:08 -0600,
> Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> >
> >dnf's default behavior is like yum with --sk
- Original Message -
> From: "Radek Holy"
> To: "James Antill"
> Cc: "Development discussions related to Fedora"
>
> Sent: Saturday, February 14, 2015 7:53:50 PM
> Subject: Re: another dnf kernel issue?
>
> - Original Messa
- Original Message -
> From: "James Antill"
> To: "Radek Holy"
> Cc: ndbeck...@gmail.com, "Development discussions related to Fedora"
>
> Sent: Friday, February 13, 2015 8:28:44 PM
> Subject: Re: another dnf kernel issue?
>
&g
- Original Message -
> From: "Neal Becker"
> To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Sent: Monday, February 9, 2015 3:08:17 PM
> Subject: another dnf kernel issue?
>
> [nbecker@nbecker1 ~]$ sudo dnf remove kernel*3.18.3*
> [sudo] password for nbecker:
> No match for argument: kernel*3.18.3*
>
- Original Message -
> From: "Neal Becker"
> To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Sent: Thursday, January 22, 2015 1:25:40 AM
> Subject: another dnf problem
>
> I installed kernel* from updates-testing. Now I want to go back to
> distro-sync.
> Let's try it:
> sudo dnf distro-sync kernel*
- Original Message -
> From: "Radek Holy"
> To: "Development discussions related to Fedora"
>
> Sent: Wednesday, January 14, 2015 1:50:59 PM
> Subject: Re: A little problem with dnf
>
> - Original Message -
> > From: "Adrian S
- Original Message -
> From: "Adrian Soliard"
> To: "Development discussions related to Fedora"
>
> Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2015 1:09:43 PM
> Subject: Re: A little problem with dnf
>
> 2015-01-13 6:33 GMT-03:00 Radek Holy :
> >
- Original Message -
> From: "Jan Zelený"
> To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2015 8:33:21 AM
> Subject: Re: A little problem with dnf
>
> On 12. 1. 2015 at 07:55:26, Adrian Soliard wrote:
> > 2015-01-12 5:35 GMT-03:00 Igor Gnatenko :
> > > On Mon, Jan 12, 201
- Original Message -
> From: "Hedayat Vatankhah"
> To: "Development discussions related to Fedora"
>
> Sent: Monday, January 5, 2015 7:50:27 PM
> Subject: Re: Yet another frustration with Fedora package management
> Radek Holy wrote
- Original Message -
> From: "Hedayat Vatankhah"
> To: "Development discussions related to Fedora"
>
> Sent: Saturday, January 3, 2015 9:42:01 PM
> Subject: Yet another frustration with Fedora package management
> Hi!
> Summary: Try to prevent a package from being updated/installed from
- Original Message -
> From: "Radek Holy"
> To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Sent: Tuesday, December 9, 2014 6:28:54 PM
> Subject: Poll: How users use DNF
>
> Dear users of YUM and DNF,
>
> I'm writing to you regarding a request for your feed
Dear users of YUM and DNF,
I'm writing to you regarding a request for your feedback. I would be very
grateful if you could send me a brief description of how you use YUM or DNF
currently or how would you like to use it. I am particularly interested in the
occurrences of "dnf/yum install" calls
- Original Message -
> From: "Michael Schroeder"
> To: "Development discussions related to Fedora"
>
> Sent: Sunday, November 9, 2014 4:03:37 PM
> Subject: Re: Status of weak dependencies support in Fedora 21+
>
> On Sat, Nov 08, 2014 at 11:26:50PM +0100, drago01 wrote:
> > Well if you
- Original Message -
> From: "Miroslav Suchý"
> To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Sent: Thursday, November 6, 2014 10:31:31 AM
> Subject: Re: Running docker in a mock chroot
>
> On 11/05/2014 11:45 PM, Dridi Boukelmoune wrote:
> > I haven't really tried, I only wanted to look at fig 1.0
- Original Message -
> From: "Ankur Sinha"
> To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Sent: Thursday, July 17, 2014 9:40:03 AM
> Subject: Re: dnf-0.5.4 released
>
> On Thu, 2014-07-17 at 08:47 +0200, Ales Kozumplik wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > New DNF is out since yesterday. I built the whole stack
- Original Message -
> From: "Jan Zelený"
> To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Sent: Tuesday, June 17, 2014 9:07:39 AM
> Subject: Re: F22 System Wide Change: Replace Yum With DNF
>
> On 16. 6. 2014 at 19:49:35, Peter Oliver wrote:
> > On 16 June 2014 08:31, Jan Zelený wrote:
> > > On 13
- Original Message -
> From: "Vít Ondruch"
> To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Sent: Monday, February 3, 2014 12:13:44 PM
> Subject: Re: Nightly builds of DNF available
>
>
> Dne 3.2.2014 11:17, Ankur Sinha napsal(a):
> > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:NamingGuidelines#Pre-Re
I have just changed the versioning scheme. Thank you for pointing it out.
Best regards
--
Radek Holý
Associate Software Engineer
Software Management Team
Red Hat Czech
- Original Message -
From: "Stanislav Ochotnicky"
To: "Radek Holy" , "Development discu
Hello Ankur,
On Mon, 2014-02-03 at 6:33:02 AM, Ankur Sinha wrote:
> Can you please check if the repodata is being generated properly? I can
> see dnf-0.4.12-1.git8c69fa2.fc20.noarch.rpm in my web browser[1], but a
> dnf check-update doesn't list it as an update. Here's the relevant
> output from d
On Thu, 2014-01-30 at 5:11:31 AM, Ankur Sinha wrote:
> Is it OK to file bugs at bugzilla for nightlies, or should we only file
> bugs for the versions pushed to Fedora?
Yes, it is, sure.
Best regards
--
Radek Holý
Associate Software Engineer
Software Management Team
Red Hat Czech
--
devel maili
ubject: Re: Nightly builds of DNF available
On 01/29/2014 05:03 PM, Radek Holy wrote:
> I am glad to announce the launch of continuous integration job for DNF. Each
> change now starts the bunch of DNF tests on top of upstream versions of
> hawkey, librepo and libcomps.
>
> It also me
Dear all,
I am glad to announce the launch of continuous integration job for DNF. Each
change now starts the bunch of DNF tests on top of upstream versions of hawkey,
librepo and libcomps.
It also means that from now nightly builds of DNF and its dependencies are
available to you. Download the
48 matches
Mail list logo
