Re: Proposal to deprecated `fedpkg local`

2021-01-27 Thread Radovan Sroka
"fedpkg local lets me cycle through build failures faster in the early
stages"

Totally agree.

On Wed, Jan 27, 2021 at 5:34 PM Gwyn Ciesla via devel <
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org> wrote:

>
>
>
> --
> Gwyn Ciesla
> she/her/hers
> 
> in your fear, seek only peace
> in your fear, seek only love
> -d. bowie
>
> Sent with ProtonMail Secure Email.
>
> ‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
> On Wednesday, January 27, 2021 10:27 AM, Fabio Valentini <
> decatho...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Jan 27, 2021 at 5:24 PM Gwyn Ciesla via devel
> > devel@lists.fedoraproject.org wrote:
> >
>
> > > It's needed for testing builds against versions of packages not yet in
> mock. I use it almost every day. Losing it would make things like testing
> solib bumps harder.
> >
>
> > I've done local test builds for soname bumps and similar things lots
> > of times, and I've never used (or thought about using) fedpkg local
> > for that.
> > I used "mock --chain" or a combination of "mock --postinstall
> > --no-clean" for those builds ... which is much closer to what koji
> > will do with your builds, and gives every build the clean environment
> > it deserves >:-)
>
> That's a great thing to do, but fedpkg local lets me cycle through build
> failures faster in the early stages. I'd really hate to see it go; If
> others don't use it, they can keep not using it. :)
>
> >
>
> > Fabio
> >
>
> > devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> > To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> > Fedora Code of Conduct:
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
> > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> > List Archives:
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
>
> ___
> devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct:
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives:
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
>


-- 
--
-

Radovan Sroka
Software Engineer | Security Technologies | Red Hat, Inc.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org


Re: Non responsive packager: mildew

2020-07-27 Thread Radovan Sroka
Hello,

These packages are mine and @Sergio Correia  so there
is no need to orphan them.

I'll try to contact him and clarify the situation.

On Mon, Jul 27, 2020 at 10:42 AM Pierre-Yves Chibon 
wrote:

> Good Morning Everyone,
>
> I have been trying to contact packagers without a proper bugzilla account
> associated with their FAS email for a while now. The first email to
> devel-announce
> is from June 13th [1].
>
> This is a requirement for packagers which is mentioned at:
>
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Join_the_package_collection_maintainers#Create_a_Bugzilla_Account
>
> Since then a number of packagers have fixed their situation but that user
> did not.
>
> Currently I see:
> mildew is maintaining rpms/PEGTL
> mildew is maintaining rpms/clevis
> mildew is maintaining rpms/jose
> mildew is maintaining rpms/json
> mildew is maintaining rpms/luksmeta
> mildew is maintaining rpms/sudo
> mildew is maintaining rpms/tang
> mildew is watching rpms/usbguard
>
>
> I am hereby starting the non-responsive procedure for that user.
>
> Does someone know how to contact them?
>
> Failing to contact them, I will be asking FESCo to orphan the packages.
>
>
> Thanks in advance for your help,
>
> Pierre
>
>
> [1]
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel-annou...@lists.fedoraproject.org/thread/HDK6TTRXN7BQTYNSOR3TA5HMMKWQ5UQT/
> ___
> devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct:
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives:
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
>


-- 
--
-

Radovan Sroka
Software Engineer | Security Technologies | Red Hat, Inc.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org


Re: Non-responsive maintainer - Daniel Kopeček

2018-07-23 Thread Radovan Sroka
Hi Vitaly,

According to the team calendar he is on his PTO since Thursday. He should
be back tomorrow I guess :).

On Sun, Jul 22, 2018 at 7:01 PM Vitaly Zaitsev 
wrote:

> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA256
>
> Hello!
>
> According Non-responsive Maintainer Policy I'm asking the maintainer
> to respond and resolve issues with packages spdlog and json.
>
> RHBZ (spdlog): https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1468817
>
> RHBZ (json): https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1558490
>
> - --
> Sincerely,
>  Vitaly Zaitsev (vit...@easycoding.org)
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
>
> iQIzBAEBCAAdFiEEGFSlHDlYR1Xq8pxov5n8bdRauQoFAltUuCoACgkQv5n8bdRa
> uQqu6g//Shwdm4h3DieFglOLErUz0ptD3/uNebYUTw1mbPlqQHEnb3tXVU6cSKUS
> JJTBz7fnfbyK/cTTaoazVsSIiF738LcHPMTz75HNLLsnExaDenv9fbaObfrXr5QK
> gMy+CR7kh831vmWHCklSmKc1FXz2jsWRt3MqBIF+1fx5hqObEMmLK9Kd5NIJZh4n
> m/55OjKSS5GjUedExo9pMbCYIPHWnx72ilwvJMpysyH6L6TbU6esl0KU9V9x94hh
> yc3J+3MSMv3mhfnLGlUvP3+WqTdE8V5PyvV9my7w/sm1Z3jT8noFKucYHGtk13kB
> AfjXyzMqSPAlb9Ek8IE+GEsc1aQtB0N5KxGE3oC+e0DSw295j6jNkEWMMIRyjsVB
> 62yFlJtThOr8s3OwJ509ayg/DKsXdV0v1jZFoUKN3RlfyeBabhzQZip2QlEtIH6m
> QIcArtxq46OBIuowgvfAdx4Hu6L3uwKWtGHp0YVKQ6yW942dtdBGi7S4Fq9blzPZ
> euCP0HB9ceUC/FCP+cdpslQ3DCVMBDDSfnvpx2N63gxv1Q12Zdfthv3NdHSB1c7E
> 5dBMQbs8yzT5QbdG4VC5dZ9Q2koTxx6PzyHUedKsjhcS2c7Cyzd+9wmsxOYs3SFf
> XAijz2rPC0pdHlw7asMFIuoUaybJYnFWV9NhuOnSvpTwfdx09wM=
> =KjxK
> -END PGP SIGNATURE-
> ___
> devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives:
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/TZ67FVO57UHOAZA3KNBH6LQ4BW4B5YCU/
>
-- 
--
-

Radovan Sroka
Associate Software Engineer | Security Technologies | Red hat, Inc.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/HN26C3Q3CYM3S7J2UIWGXKNVXIN5WMEW/


[HEADS UP] [RAWHIDE] changed secure path in default sudoers

2017-12-14 Thread Radovan Sroka
/usr/local/sbin and /usr/local/bin has been added into secure_path variable
in default sudoers on RAWHIDE sudo.

It was requested in https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1166185.

If you don't want it you still can revert it. You can add there file under
/etc/sudoers.d e.g. /etc/sudoers.d/secure_path_revert.

With this approach you can still use default sudoers and have it updated
after each update of sudo and also have your own configuration under
/etc/sudoers.d directory.

$ cat /etc/sudoers.d/secure_path_revert
#replace secure_path with old default
Defaultssecure_path = /sbin:/bin:/usr/sbin:/usr/bin


-- 
--
-

Radovan Sroka
Associate Software Engineer | Security Technologies | Red hat, Inc.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org


Re: [HEADS-UP] unannounced libfastjson ABI change breaks rsyslog

2017-11-02 Thread Radovan Sroka
"So it shouldn't break anything else."

On Thu, Nov 2, 2017 at 8:52 AM Radovan Sroka <rsr...@redhat.com> wrote:

> Hi Guys,
>
> libfastjson is rsyslog specific library. So it should break anything else.
> I did a mistake because I didn't group updates for libfastjson and for
> rsyslog. Rsyslog was broken yesterday on fedora 26 but now it should be
> everything OK. I will be really careful with other branches and also with
> another updates in future.
>
>
> On Thu, Nov 2, 2017 at 4:36 AM Troy Curtis Jr <troycurti...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Nov 1, 2017 at 5:49 PM Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski <
>> domi...@greysector.net> wrote:
>>
>>> Dear Fedora,
>>>
>>>
>> ..snip..
>>
>>
>>> This breaks, for example, rsyslog-8.30.0-3, which was compiled against
>>> libfastjson-0.99.7, but didn't go out together with it, so when I ran
>>> dnf update, the set contained only new rsyslog, which, when run with
>>> libfastjson-0.99.6 (same SONAME!) simply dies:
>>> # rsyslogd -n
>>> rsyslogd: symbol lookup error: rsyslogd: undefined symbol:
>>> fjson_global_do_case_sensitive_comparison
>>>
>>> Dear maintainers, please use abipkgdiff when doing library updates.
>>> Upstreams do break ABI without bumping SONAME sometimes.
>>>
>>>
>> I'm not sure if it is a real issue or not.  A user in #fedora got bit by
>> this where his rsyslog was upgraded but not his libfastjson.  Updating to
>> libfastjson-0.99.7 allowed rsyslog to startup and begin logging.  But it
>> appeared to die quickly.  This happened at least twice.
>>
>> There could be other things going on with his setup, but I thought I'd
>> point out a potential issue to be on the lookout for even if the missing
>> symbol has been resolved.
>>
>> Troy
>>
> --
> --
> -
>
> Radovan Sroka
> Associate Software Engineer | Security Technologies | Red hat, Inc.
>
-- 
--
-

Radovan Sroka
Associate Software Engineer | Security Technologies | Red hat, Inc.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org


Re: [HEADS-UP] unannounced libfastjson ABI change breaks rsyslog

2017-11-02 Thread Radovan Sroka
Hi Guys,

libfastjson is rsyslog specific library. So it should break anything else.
I did a mistake because I didn't group updates for libfastjson and for
rsyslog. Rsyslog was broken yesterday on fedora 26 but now it should be
everything OK. I will be really careful with other branches and also with
another updates in future.


On Thu, Nov 2, 2017 at 4:36 AM Troy Curtis Jr <troycurti...@gmail.com>
wrote:

>
>
> On Wed, Nov 1, 2017 at 5:49 PM Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski <
> domi...@greysector.net> wrote:
>
>> Dear Fedora,
>>
>>
> ..snip..
>
>
>> This breaks, for example, rsyslog-8.30.0-3, which was compiled against
>> libfastjson-0.99.7, but didn't go out together with it, so when I ran
>> dnf update, the set contained only new rsyslog, which, when run with
>> libfastjson-0.99.6 (same SONAME!) simply dies:
>> # rsyslogd -n
>> rsyslogd: symbol lookup error: rsyslogd: undefined symbol:
>> fjson_global_do_case_sensitive_comparison
>>
>> Dear maintainers, please use abipkgdiff when doing library updates.
>> Upstreams do break ABI without bumping SONAME sometimes.
>>
>>
> I'm not sure if it is a real issue or not.  A user in #fedora got bit by
> this where his rsyslog was upgraded but not his libfastjson.  Updating to
> libfastjson-0.99.7 allowed rsyslog to startup and begin logging.  But it
> appeared to die quickly.  This happened at least twice.
>
> There could be other things going on with his setup, but I thought I'd
> point out a potential issue to be on the lookout for even if the missing
> symbol has been resolved.
>
> Troy
>
-- 
--
-

Radovan Sroka
Associate Software Engineer | Security Technologies | Red hat, Inc.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org


apple swift fedora support

2017-10-16 Thread Radovan Sroka
Is there any initiative to package apple swift and other swift tools?

https://github.com/apple/swift

Thanks.
-- 
--
-

Radovan Sroka
Associate Software Engineer | Security Technologies | Red hat, Inc.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org