Re: plan to orphan cassandra

On Tue, Sep 17, 2019 at 1:21 PM Honza Horak wrote: > > On 9/8/19 8:19 PM, Miro Hrončok wrote: > > On 06. 09. 19 20:15, Ricardo Martinelli Oliveira wrote: > >> Honza, > >> > >> Can we discuss the possibility to hand over the package to me? I am > >

Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers

I'll take cassandar On Mon, Sep 16, 2019 at 11:37 AM Gwyn Ciesla via devel wrote: > > I'll take python-junitxml and pygobject2. > > > -- > Gwyn Ciesla > she/her/hers > > in your fear, seek only peace > in your fear, seek only love > -d. bowie > >

Re: plan to orphan cassandra

Honza, Can we discuss the possibility to hand over the package to me? I am the guy who annoyed you on scl mailing list and I'm red hatter too. I'm interested to have this working on OpenShift since our partners did not get it run wel on it. On Thu, Aug 22, 2019 at 10:19 AM Honza Horak wrote: >

Re: Cassandra package looking for human power

I can help you with it. Do I need to request approval to get maintainer role to this package? I already created packages before. On Mon, Nov 5, 2018 at 2:58 PM Jakub Janco wrote: > > Hello Fedora developers and maintainers, > > Apache Cassandra is a free and open-source distributed NoSQL database

Re: Golang SIG primary goals?

Hi Robert, Maybe a document with Go packaging guidelines would be very helpful. Also, it would be good document and maintain gofed as part of the go packager toolkit. I don't know if they are all already part of golang-SIG, but I'm in to help improving the wiki pages. On Fri, Aug 24, 2018 at

Re: Golang SIG for Fedora

I think we already have tools for that. What I expect with the SIG is something that could improve the Go Packaging best practices listed in https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Go On Mon, Aug 6, 2018 at 9:10 AM, Vitor Ramos wrote: > I think that we can mature in the first moment the

Re: Golang SIG for Fedora

+1, I started looking on packaging Go libraries and looking for recommendations. I saw [1] but as this seems more a draft (so a WIP document) it would be good if we have specific group to discuss best practices, package reviews, etc. [1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Go On

Re: macro for /usr/lib/java

Fantastic! Thanks Antonio! On Sat, Jun 30, 2018 at 10:26 AM, Antonio Trande wrote: > See > > $ cat /usr/lib/rpm/macros.d/macros.jpackage > > %_jnidir --> %{_prefix}/lib/java > > On 30/06/2018 15:15, Ricardo Martinelli Oliveira wrote: >> Hello, >> >

macro for /usr/lib/java

Hello, I'm upgrading sbt and scala packages to 0.13.13 and 2.11.11 respectively. I am looking for a way to point to a jar file for jansi-native without hard-coding the path (/usr/lib/java). Is there a macro available that points to that path? what is the best option to avoid hard-code this

Re: josm orphaned

Jakub, Can we discuss tomorrow about the package? I'd love to be co-maintainer since I use josm frequently. On Sun, Mar 25, 2018 at 5:46 PM, Jakub Jelen wrote: > Hello, > I would like take the package, but other co-maintainers are always welcomed. > I filled the following

Re: josm orphaned

I never packaged something for Fedora before, but can you give me a chance to see how is the effort to maintain the package before I adopt it? On Thu, Mar 22, 2018 at 3:51 AM, Till Maas wrote: > Hi > > I orphaned josm (https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/josm), the java >