[389-devel] Re: Porting Perl scripts

2019-06-24 Thread Rich Megginson
On 6/24/19 10:00 AM, Mark Reynolds wrote: On 6/24/19 11:46 AM, Simon Pichugin wrote: Hi team, I am working on porting our admin Perl scripts to Python CLI. Please, check the list and share your opinion: - cl-dump.pl - dumps and decodes changelog. Is it used often (if at all)?

[389-devel] Re: Logging future direction and ideas.

2019-05-10 Thread Rich Megginson
On 5/9/19 9:13 PM, William Brown wrote: Hi all, So I think it's time for me to write some logging code to improve the situation. Relevant links before we start: https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/issue/49415 http://www.port389.org/docs/389ds/design/logging-performance-improvement.html

[389-devel] Re: [discuss] Entry cache and backend txn plugin problems

2019-02-26 Thread Rich Megginson
On 2/26/19 4:26 PM, William Brown wrote: On 26 Feb 2019, at 18:32, Ludwig Krispenz wrote: Hi, I need a bit of time to read the docs and clear my thoughts, but one comment below On 02/25/2019 01:49 AM, William Brown wrote: On 23 Feb 2019, at 02:46, Mark Reynolds wrote: I want to start a

Re: packaging ruby dependencies

2017-10-25 Thread Rich Megginson
On 10/25/2017 01:43 PM, nicolas.mail...@laposte.net wrote: Hi Jason, Packaging deps is a virtuous circle: it makes the work of the next person who needs them for other software easier, which increases the chance other software is packaged, which increases the value of the distro as a whole,

Re: packaging ruby dependencies

2017-10-25 Thread Rich Megginson
On 10/25/2017 09:49 AM, William Moreno wrote: 2017-10-25 9:38 GMT-06:00 Sandro Bonazzola >: 2017-10-25 16:54 GMT+02:00 Jason Brooks >: Hi all -- As part of a

Re: journal-triggerd, interest, alternatives?

2017-02-15 Thread Rich Megginson
On 02/15/2017 11:31 AM, Martin Langhoff wrote: On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 11:19 AM, Rich Megginson <rmegg...@redhat.com> wrote: Probably most Fedora users will use a general purpose tool like rsyslog (already in Fedora) or fluentd/logstash to read events from journald and do custom tr

Re: journal-triggerd, interest, alternatives?

2017-02-15 Thread Rich Megginson
On 02/15/2017 07:23 AM, Martin Langhoff wrote: My applications largely log to system loggers. Looking around for something that triggers an email when certain log entries appear in system logs (ie: python stacktraces), I got just one hit, journal-triggerd. It is not in Fedora.

[389-devel] Re: Design Doc: Automatic server tuning by default

2016-11-07 Thread Rich Megginson
On 11/06/2016 04:07 PM, William Brown wrote: On Fri, 2016-11-04 at 12:07 +0100, Ludwig Krispenz wrote: On 11/04/2016 06:51 AM, William Brown wrote: http://www.port389.org/docs/389ds/design/autotuning.html I would like to hear discussion on this topic. thread number: independent of number

[389-devel] Re: Close of 48241, let's not support bad crypto

2016-10-03 Thread Rich Megginson
On 10/03/2016 09:34 PM, William Brown wrote: On Mon, 2016-10-03 at 21:26 -0600, Rich Megginson wrote: On 10/03/2016 08:58 PM, William Brown wrote: Hi, I want to close #48241 [0] as "wontfix". I do not believe that it's appropriate to provide SHA3 as a password hashing algorithm.

[389-devel] Re: Close of 48241, let's not support bad crypto

2016-10-03 Thread Rich Megginson
On 10/03/2016 08:58 PM, William Brown wrote: Hi, I want to close #48241 [0] as "wontfix". I do not believe that it's appropriate to provide SHA3 as a password hashing algorithm. The SHA3 algorithm is designed to be fast, and cryptographically secure. It's target usage is for signatures and

[EPEL-devel] Re: nodejs update

2016-09-08 Thread Rich Megginson
On 09/08/2016 11:27 AM, Stephen Gallagher wrote: On 08/22/2016 11:23 AM, Stephen Gallagher wrote: On 08/11/2016 07:43 AM, Stephen Gallagher wrote: On 08/11/2016 05:16 AM, Zuzana Svetlikova wrote: Hi! As some of you may know, nodejs package that is present in EPEL is pretty outdated. The

[389-devel] Re: Sign compare checking

2016-08-30 Thread Rich Megginson
On 08/30/2016 03:27 AM, Howard Chu wrote: Date: Mon, 29 Aug 2016 11:43:27 -0600 From: Rich Megginson <rmegg...@redhat.com> Subject: [389-devel] Re: Sign compare checking To: 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Message-ID: <a7fdb987-8efa-d26d-08c1-3cf0ecb59...@redhat.com> Content-Typ

[389-devel] Re: Sign compare checking

2016-08-29 Thread Rich Megginson
On 08/28/2016 11:13 PM, William Brown wrote: So either, this is a bug in the way openldap uses the ber_len_t type, we have a mistake in our logic, or something else hokey is going on. I would like to update this to: if ( (tag != LBER_END_OF_SEQORSET) && (len == 0) && (*fstr != NULL) ) Or

[EPEL-devel] Re: nodejs update

2016-08-25 Thread Rich Megginson
On 08/25/2016 03:32 PM, Neal Gompa wrote: On Thu, Aug 25, 2016 at 10:48 AM, Rich Megginson <rmegg...@redhat.com> wrote: How does EPEL deal with the fact that nodejs won't work with openssl 1.0.1? For CentOS we have a patch that allows nodejs 4.x to build with openssl 1.0.1 in EL7. A

[EPEL-devel] Re: nodejs update

2016-08-25 Thread Rich Megginson
On 08/11/2016 05:43 AM, Stephen Gallagher wrote: On 08/11/2016 05:16 AM, Zuzana Svetlikova wrote: Hi! As some of you may know, nodejs package that is present in EPEL is pretty outdated. The current v0.10 that we have will go EOL in October and npm (package manager) is already not maintained.

[389-devel] Re: Please review: 48951 dsconf and dsadm foundations

2016-08-22 Thread Rich Megginson
On 08/22/2016 05:23 PM, William Brown wrote: On Sun, 2016-08-21 at 21:33 -0600, Rich Megginson wrote: On 08/21/2016 09:02 PM, William Brown wrote: Anything that is yum, systemd command, etc. is ansible. Anything about installing an instance or 389 specific we do. I think that is an arbitrary

[389-devel] Re: Please review: 48951 dsconf and dsadm foundations

2016-08-21 Thread Rich Megginson
On 08/21/2016 07:56 PM, William Brown wrote: On Sun, 2016-08-21 at 19:44 -0600, Rich Megginson wrote: On 08/21/2016 05:28 PM, William Brown wrote: On Fri, 2016-08-19 at 11:21 +0200, Ludwig Krispenz wrote: Hi William, On 08/19/2016 02:22 AM, William Brown wrote: On Wed, 2016-08-17 at 14:53

[389-devel] Re: Please review: 48951 dsconf and dsadm foundations

2016-08-21 Thread Rich Megginson
On 08/21/2016 05:28 PM, William Brown wrote: On Fri, 2016-08-19 at 11:21 +0200, Ludwig Krispenz wrote: Hi William, On 08/19/2016 02:22 AM, William Brown wrote: On Wed, 2016-08-17 at 14:53 +1000, William Brown wrote: https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/48951

[389-devel] Re: Logging performance improvement

2016-06-30 Thread Rich Megginson
On 06/30/2016 08:14 PM, William Brown wrote: On Thu, 2016-06-30 at 20:01 -0600, Rich Megginson wrote: On 06/30/2016 07:52 PM, William Brown wrote: Hi, I've been thinking about this for a while, so I decided to dump my thoughts to a document. I think I won't get to implementing

[389-devel] Re: Logging performance improvement

2016-06-30 Thread Rich Megginson
On 06/30/2016 07:52 PM, William Brown wrote: Hi, I've been thinking about this for a while, so I decided to dump my thoughts to a document. I think I won't get to implementing this for a while, but it would really help our server performance.

Re: jwm

2016-05-31 Thread Rich Megginson
On 05/31/2016 11:56 AM, Dennis Gilmore wrote: On Tuesday, May 31, 2016 2:31:04 PM CDT Bernardo Sulzbach wrote: On 05/31/2016 01:59 PM, Rich Megginson wrote: On 05/31/2016 10:42 AM, Bernardo Sulzbach wrote: On 05/31/2016 01:39 PM, Michael Catanzaro wrote: On Sun, 2016-05-29 at 17:17 -0400

Re: jwm

2016-05-31 Thread Rich Megginson
On 05/31/2016 11:31 AM, Bernardo Sulzbach wrote: On 05/31/2016 01:59 PM, Rich Megginson wrote: On 05/31/2016 10:42 AM, Bernardo Sulzbach wrote: On 05/31/2016 01:39 PM, Michael Catanzaro wrote: On Sun, 2016-05-29 at 17:17 -0400, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: They usually have a 60 hour a week

Re: jwm

2016-05-31 Thread Rich Megginson
On 05/31/2016 10:42 AM, Bernardo Sulzbach wrote: On 05/31/2016 01:39 PM, Michael Catanzaro wrote: On Sun, 2016-05-29 at 17:17 -0400, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: They usually have a 60 hour a week job I hope this isn't accurate...? I didn't write about it myself, but was left wondering

Re: [389-devel] Please review: [389 Project] #48257: Fix coverity issues - 08/24/2015

2015-11-06 Thread Rich Megginson
On 11/05/2015 05:09 PM, Noriko Hosoi wrote: https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/48257 https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/48257/0001-Ticket-48257-Fix-coverity-issues-08-24-2015.patch Once this ticket is closed, is it okay to respin nunc_stans which is going to be version 0.1.6?

Re: Cloning bugs: Just Don't Do It

2015-11-03 Thread Rich Megginson
On 11/03/2015 09:13 AM, Adam Williamson wrote: You see that 'Clone' button in Bugzilla? You, yes you, with your cursor hovering over it? Don't do it! It's a trap. Cloning a bug is almost never actually what you want to do. When you clone a bug, all of the following are transferred to the new

Re: [389-devel] Please comment: [389 Project] #48285: The dirsrv user/group should be created in rpm %pre, and ideally with fixed uid/gid

2015-10-21 Thread Rich Megginson
On 10/21/2015 12:20 PM, Noriko Hosoi wrote: Thanks to William for his reviewing the patch. I'm going to push it. But before doing so, I have a question regarding the autogen files. The proposed patch requires to rerun autogen.sh and push the generated files to the git. My current env has

Re: [389-devel] [lib389] Deref control advice needed

2015-09-02 Thread Rich Megginson
On 09/02/2015 10:35 AM, thierry bordaz wrote: On 08/27/2015 02:31 AM, Rich Megginson wrote: On 08/26/2015 03:28 AM, William Brown wrote: In relation to ticket 47757, I have started work on a deref control for Noriko. The idea is to get it working in lib389, then get it upstreamed into pyldap

Re: [389-devel] [lib389] Deref control advice needed

2015-08-26 Thread Rich Megginson
On 08/26/2015 03:28 AM, William Brown wrote: In relation to ticket 47757, I have started work on a deref control for Noriko. The idea is to get it working in lib389, then get it upstreamed into pyldap. At this point it's all done, except that the actual request control doesn't appear to work.

Re: [389-devel] Review of plugin code

2015-08-07 Thread Rich Megginson
On 08/07/2015 05:18 PM, William Brown wrote: On Thu, 2015-08-06 at 14:25 -0700, Noriko Hosoi wrote: Hi William, Very interesting plug-in! Thanks. As a plugin, it's value is quite useless due to the nsDS5ReplicaType flags. But it's a nice simple exercise to get ones head around how the plugin

[389-devel] Please review: Ticket #48227 rpm.mk doesn't build srpms for 389-ds and nunc-stans

2015-07-21 Thread Rich Megginson
https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/48227/0001-Ticket-48227-rpm.mk-doesn-t-build-srpms-for-389-ds-a.patch -- 389-devel mailing list 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel

[389-devel] Please review: Ticket #48224 - redux 2 - logconv.pl should handle *.tar.xz, *.txz, *.xz log files

2015-07-20 Thread Rich Megginson
https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/48224/0001-Ticket-48224-redux-2-logconv.pl-should-handle-.tar.x.patch -- 389-devel mailing list 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel

[389-devel] Please review: Ticket #48224 - logconv.pl should handle *.tar.xz, *.txz, *.xz log files

2015-07-13 Thread Rich Megginson
https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/48224/0001-Ticket-48224-logconv.pl-should-handle-.tar.xz-.txz-..patch -- 389-devel mailing list 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel

[389-devel] jenkins is disabled until further notice (EOM)

2015-06-19 Thread Rich Megginson
-- 389-devel mailing list 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel

[389-devel] 389 performance testing tools

2015-05-15 Thread Rich Megginson
No readme yet, but here are the scripts: https://github.com/richm/389-perf-test -- 389-devel mailing list 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel

[389-devel] Please review: nunc-stans: Ticket #33 - coverity - 13178 Explicit null dereferenced

2015-05-12 Thread Rich Megginson
https://fedorahosted.org/nunc-stans/attachment/ticket/33/0001-Ticket-33-coverity-13178-Explicit-null-dereferenced.patch -- 389-devel mailing list 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel

[389-devel] Please review: nunc-stans: Tickets 34-38 - coverity 13179-13183 - Dereference before NULL check

2015-05-12 Thread Rich Megginson
https://fedorahosted.org/nunc-stans/attachment/ticket/34/0001-Tickets-34-38-coverity-13179-13183-Dereference-befor.patch -- 389-devel mailing list 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel

[389-devel] Please review: Ticket #48122 nunc-stans FD leak

2015-05-11 Thread Rich Megginson
https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/48122/0001-Ticket-48122-nunc-stans-FD-leak.2.patch -- 389-devel mailing list 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel

[389-devel] Take 2: Please review: Ticket #48178 add config param to enable nunc-stans

2015-05-01 Thread Rich Megginson
Fixed problem with previous patch. https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/48178/0001-Ticket-48178-add-config-param-to-enable-nunc-stans.patch -- 389-devel mailing list 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel

[389-devel] Please review: Ticket #48178 add config param to enable nunc-stans

2015-04-30 Thread Rich Megginson
https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/48178/0001-Ticket-48178-add-config-param-to-enable-nunc-stans.patch -- 389-devel mailing list 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel

Re: [389-devel] [389-users] GUI console and Kerberos

2015-03-16 Thread Rich Megginson
Allow from all /Location in /etc/dirsrv/admin-serv/admserv.conf On Wed, Mar 11, 2015 at 2:13 PM, Rich Megginson rmegg...@redhat.com wrote: On 03/11/2015 11:54 AM, Paul Robert Marino wrote: Hey every one I have a question I know at least once in the past i setup the admin console so it could

Re: [389-devel] [389-users] GUI console and Kerberos

2015-03-12 Thread Rich Megginson
On 03/11/2015 11:54 AM, Paul Robert Marino wrote: Hey every one I have a question I know at least once in the past i setup the admin console so it could utilize Kerberos passwords based on a howto I found once which after I changed jobs I could never find again. today I was looking for

[389-devel] Please review #2: Ticket #48105 create tests - tests subdir - test server/client programs - test scripts

2015-03-09 Thread Rich Megginson
I found a bug with my previous patch. https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/48105/0001-Ticket-48105-create-tests-tests-subdir-test-server-c.2.patch -- 389-devel mailing list 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel

[389-devel] Please review: Ticket #48105 create tests - tests subdir - test server/client programs - test scripts

2015-03-06 Thread Rich Megginson
https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/48105/0001-Ticket-48105-create-tests-tests-subdir-test-server-c.patch -- 389-devel mailing list 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel

[389-devel] Please review: Ticket #48106 create code doc with doxygen

2015-03-04 Thread Rich Megginson
https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/48106/0001-Ticket-48106-create-code-doc-with-doxygen.patch -- 389-devel mailing list 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel

Re: [389-devel] No rule to make target dbmon.sh

2015-02-26 Thread Rich Megginson
On 02/26/2015 04:31 PM, William wrote: On latest master I am getting: make[1]: *** No rule to make target `ldap/admin/src/scripts/dbmon.sh', needed by `all-am'. Stop. Did a git clean -f -x -d followed by autoreconf -i; ./configure --with-openldap --prefix=/srv --enable-debug Not sure, but

[389-devel] Please review: Ticket #48046 - convert nunc-stans to an autoconf project

2015-02-25 Thread Rich Megginson
https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/48046/0001-Ticket-48046-convert-nunc-stans-to-an-autoconf-proje.patch -- 389-devel mailing list 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel

Re: Removing (or trying to) BerkeleyDB from Fedora

2015-01-08 Thread Rich Megginson
On 01/08/2015 06:56 AM, Jan Staněk wrote: Hi guys, as the new BerkeleyDB 6.x has a more restrictive license than the previous versions (AGPLv3 vs. LGPLv2), and due to that many projects cannot use it, perhaps it is time to get rid of it from Fedora for good - or at least trim down the list of

[389-devel] we now have epel7 branches for fedpkg . . .

2014-11-10 Thread Rich Megginson
. . . but it looks like we are gated by rhel7.1 - waiting for TLS 1.1 fixes/packages to show up with rhel 7.1 -- 389-devel mailing list 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel

[389-devel] No more spam from jenkins

2014-10-21 Thread Rich Megginson
I don't know what's wrong with jenkins. I tried to fix it, but I cannot figure out what the problem is. In the meantime, I have disabled it, so no more spam. Sorry for the spam. -- 389-devel mailing list 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: [389-devel] if you tag a release, please release a tarball too

2014-09-19 Thread Rich Megginson
On 09/19/2014 01:15 AM, Timo Aaltonen wrote: On 19.09.2014 09:33, Timo Aaltonen wrote: Hi 1.3.3.3 is tagged in git since a week ago, but there's no tarball for it. Dunno if you have scripts for the release dance, but if you do please include the tarball build to it so it's not a

Re: [389-devel] Please review: Fix slapi_td_plugin_lock_init prototype

2014-09-15 Thread Rich Megginson
On 09/15/2014 05:20 AM, Petr Viktorin wrote: diff --git a/ldap/servers/slapd/slapi-plugin.h b/ldap/servers/slapd/slapi-plugin.h index f1ecfe8..268e465 100644 --- a/ldap/servers/slapd/slapi-plugin.h +++ b/ldap/servers/slapd/slapi-plugin.h @@ -5582,7 +5582,7 @@ void slapi_td_get_val(int

Re: [389-devel] Please review: Fix slapi_td_plugin_lock_init prototype

2014-09-15 Thread Rich Megginson
On 09/15/2014 07:28 PM, Petr Viktorin wrote: On 09/15/2014 09:06 PM, Rich Megginson wrote: On 09/15/2014 05:20 AM, Petr Viktorin wrote: diff --git a/ldap/servers/slapd/slapi-plugin.h b/ldap/servers/slapd/slapi-plugin.h index f1ecfe8..268e465 100644 --- a/ldap/servers/slapd/slapi-plugin.h +++ b

[389-devel] Please review: Ticket #47892 coverity defects found in 1.3.3.1

2014-09-12 Thread Rich Megginson
https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/47892/0001-Ticket-47892-coverity-defects-found-in-1.3.3.1.patch -- 389-devel mailing list 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel

Re: [389-devel] Please review lib389: start/stop may hand indefinitely

2014-09-05 Thread Rich Megginson
On 09/05/2014 10:32 AM, thierry bordaz wrote: On 09/05/2014 01:10 PM, thierry bordaz wrote: Detected with testcase 47838 that defines ciphers not recognized during SSL init. 47838 testcase makes the full test suite to hang. -- 389-devel mailing list 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[389-devel] Please review: Redux: Ticket #47692 single valued attribute replicated ADD does not work

2014-07-10 Thread Rich Megginson
Previous fix was incomplete. https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/47692/0001-Ticket-47692-single-valued-attribute-replicated-ADD-.2.patch -- 389-devel mailing list 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel

[389-devel] Please review: Ticket #47831 - server restart wipes out index config if there is a default index

2014-06-25 Thread Rich Megginson
https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/47831/0001-Ticket-47831-server-restart-wipes-out-index-config-i.patch -- 389-devel mailing list 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel

Re: [389-devel] single valued attribute update resolution

2014-04-30 Thread Rich Megginson
On 04/25/2014 07:43 AM, Ludwig Krispenz wrote: There are still scenarios where replication can lead to inconsistent states for single valued attributes, which I think has two reasons: - for single valued attributes there are scenarios where modifications applied concurrently cannot be simply

[389-devel] Please review: Take 2: Ticket #47772 empty modify returns LDAP_INVALID_DN_SYNTAX

2014-04-11 Thread Rich Megginson
https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/47772/0001-Ticket-47772-empty-modify-returns-LDAP_INVALID_DN_SY.2.patch -- 389-devel mailing list 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel

[389-devel] Please review: Ticket #47772 empty modify returns LDAP_INVALID_DN_SYNTAX

2014-04-09 Thread Rich Megginson
https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/47772/0001-Ticket-47772-empty-modify-returns-LDAP_INVALID_DN_SY.patch -- 389-devel mailing list 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel

[389-devel] Please review: Ticket #47774 mem leak in do_search - rawbase not freed upon certain errors

2014-04-09 Thread Rich Megginson
https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/47774/0001-Ticket-47774-mem-leak-in-do_search-rawbase-not-freed.patch -- 389-devel mailing list 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel

Re: [389-devel] [389-users] Source directory is now list-able

2014-04-08 Thread Rich Megginson
On 04/08/2014 02:24 PM, Timo Aaltonen wrote: On 07.04.2014 21:52, Rich Megginson wrote: http://port389.org/sources is now open and list-able. The default sort order is latest first. The http://port389.org/wiki/Source page has been updated with this link. \o/ many thanks for this :) Sure

[389-devel] Source directory is now list-able

2014-04-07 Thread Rich Megginson
http://port389.org/sources is now open and list-able. The default sort order is latest first. The http://port389.org/wiki/Source page has been updated with this link. -- 389-devel mailing list 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel

Re: [389-devel] [389-users] git repo / tarball issues

2014-04-04 Thread Rich Megginson
On 04/04/2014 10:55 AM, Timo Aaltonen wrote: On 04.04.2014 19:42, Noriko Hosoi wrote: Hi Timo, Timo Aaltonen wrote: 1) 389-ds-console 1.2.7 has no tarball though it was tagged for release in Sep'12 You can download the tar ball from here now.

[389-devel] Please review: Ticket #47492 - PassSync removes User must change password flag on the Windows side

2014-04-03 Thread Rich Megginson
https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/47492/0001-Ticket-47492-PassSync-removes-User-must-change-passw.3.patch -- 389-devel mailing list 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel

[389-devel] Please review: Ticket #47492 - PassSync removes User must change password flag on the Windows side

2014-04-03 Thread Rich Megginson
https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/47492/0001-Ticket-47492-PassSync-removes-User-must-change-passw.3.patch -- 389-devel mailing list 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel

Re: [389-devel] Changes for

2014-04-01 Thread Rich Megginson
On 04/01/2014 07:34 AM, Carsten Grzemba wrote: Hi Rich, this breaks the current implementaion for posix-winsync: Bug 716980 - winsync uses old AD entry if new one not found https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=716980 Resolves: bug 716980 Bug Description: winsync uses old AD entry if new

[389-devel] Please review: Ticket #47680 Upgraded 389-admin rpms and now I can't start dirsrv-admin

2014-03-19 Thread Rich Megginson
https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/47680/0001-Ticket-47680-Upgraded-389-admin-rpms-and-now-I-can-t.patch -- 389-devel mailing list 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel

Re: [389-devel] strcasestr vs. PL_strcasestr

2014-03-07 Thread Rich Megginson
On 03/07/2014 07:15 AM, Carsten Grzemba wrote: Hi Nathan, is there special reason why you use /strcasestr/ in ACL plugin instead of /PL_strcasestr/. It presents me some headache to build 1.3.2 on Solaris 10.

Re: [389-devel] Design review: Access control on entries specified in MODDN operation (ticket 47553)

2014-02-25 Thread Rich Megginson
On 02/25/2014 07:24 AM, thierry bordaz wrote: On 02/24/2014 10:47 PM, Noriko Hosoi wrote: Rich Megginson wrote: On 02/24/2014 09:00 AM, thierry bordaz wrote: Hello, IPA team filled this ticket https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/47553. It requires an ACI improvement so

Re: [389-devel] Design review: Access control on entries specified in MODDN operation (ticket 47553)

2014-02-25 Thread Rich Megginson
On 02/25/2014 07:42 AM, thierry bordaz wrote: On 02/25/2014 03:34 PM, Rich Megginson wrote: On 02/25/2014 07:24 AM, thierry bordaz wrote: On 02/24/2014 10:47 PM, Noriko Hosoi wrote: Rich Megginson wrote: On 02/24/2014 09:00 AM, thierry bordaz wrote: Hello, IPA team filled this ticket

Re: [389-devel] Design review: Access control on entries specified in MODDN operation (ticket 47553)

2014-02-25 Thread Rich Megginson
On 02/25/2014 08:14 AM, thierry bordaz wrote: On 02/25/2014 03:46 PM, Rich Megginson wrote: On 02/25/2014 07:42 AM, thierry bordaz wrote: On 02/25/2014 03:34 PM, Rich Megginson wrote: On 02/25/2014 07:24 AM, thierry bordaz wrote: On 02/24/2014 10:47 PM, Noriko Hosoi wrote: Rich Megginson

Re: [389-devel] Design review: Access control on entries specified in MODDN operation (ticket 47553)

2014-02-25 Thread Rich Megginson
On 02/25/2014 08:28 AM, thierry bordaz wrote: On 02/25/2014 04:17 PM, Rich Megginson wrote: On 02/25/2014 08:14 AM, thierry bordaz wrote: On 02/25/2014 03:46 PM, Rich Megginson wrote: On 02/25/2014 07:42 AM, thierry bordaz wrote: On 02/25/2014 03:34 PM, Rich Megginson wrote: On 02/25/2014

Re: [389-devel] Design review: Access control on entries specified in MODDN operation (ticket 47553)

2014-02-25 Thread Rich Megginson
On 02/25/2014 09:28 AM, thierry bordaz wrote: On 02/25/2014 04:53 PM, Ludwig Krispenz wrote: On 02/25/2014 04:45 PM, Rich Megginson wrote: On 02/25/2014 08:28 AM, thierry bordaz wrote: On 02/25/2014 04:17 PM, Rich Megginson wrote: On 02/25/2014 08:14 AM, thierry bordaz wrote: On 02/25/2014

Re: [389-devel] Design review: Access control on entries specified in MODDN operation (ticket 47553)

2014-02-25 Thread Rich Megginson
On 02/25/2014 10:00 AM, thierry bordaz wrote: On 02/25/2014 05:56 PM, Rich Megginson wrote: On 02/25/2014 09:51 AM, thierry bordaz wrote: On 02/25/2014 05:36 PM, Rich Megginson wrote: On 02/25/2014 09:28 AM, thierry bordaz wrote: On 02/25/2014 04:53 PM, Ludwig Krispenz wrote: On 02/25/2014

Re: [389-devel] Design review: Access control on entries specified in MODDN operation (ticket 47553)

2014-02-24 Thread Rich Megginson
On 02/24/2014 02:47 PM, Noriko Hosoi wrote: Rich Megginson wrote: On 02/24/2014 09:00 AM, thierry bordaz wrote: Hello, IPA team filled this ticket https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/47553. It requires an ACI improvement so that during a MODDN a given user is only allowed

Re: [389-devel] mmr.pl deprecated?

2014-02-11 Thread Rich Megginson
but in addition programs which don't use SASL but instead use the users password field for authentication can function without having to put the Kerberos database in the LDAP server. Ill send out an email to the user list once I create the github repo On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 11:09 AM, Rich Megginson

Re: [389-devel] mmr.pl deprecated?

2014-02-11 Thread Rich Megginson
, Rich Megginson rmegg...@redhat.com wrote: On 02/11/2014 08:16 AM, Paul Robert Marino wrote: I would have no problem doing that. The more I look at it I may just use it as a template for creating a new set of Perl based replication management tools. Part of the reason for dropping mmr.pl is Perl

Re: [389-devel] Please review test cases update with new modules

2014-02-11 Thread Rich Megginson
On 02/11/2014 09:55 AM, thierry bordaz wrote: Some lib389 routines moved or their name changes (schema, tasks, index and plugins): ack -- 389-devel mailing list 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel -- 389-devel mailing list

Re: [389-devel] mmr.pl deprecated?

2014-02-10 Thread Rich Megginson
On 02/09/2014 02:29 PM, Paul Robert Marino wrote: I just noticed on the wiki that it says mmr.pl is deprecated because its it is too buggy and has no maintainer There is no dedicated source code repo for it. There is no place to file bugs/tickets against it. There is no one to fix the

[389-devel] Please review: Ticket #47692 single valued attribute replicated ADD does not work

2014-02-07 Thread Rich Megginson
https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/47692/0001-Ticket-47692-single-valued-attribute-replicated-ADD-.patch -- 389-devel mailing list 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel

[389-devel] Please review: Ticket #47374 - flush.pl is not included in perl5

2014-01-31 Thread Rich Megginson
https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/47374/0001-Ticket-47374-flush.pl-is-not-included-in-perl5.2.patch -- 389-devel mailing list 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel

Re: [389-devel] 389-ds-base: /bin/sh scripts should use . instead of source

2014-01-24 Thread Rich Megginson
On 01/24/2014 04:13 AM, Roberto Polli wrote: Hi @all, iirc /bin/sh scripts should use . instead of source (see http://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/9699919799/utilities/V3_chap02.html#dot ) To use source you should change the interpreter to be /bin/bash

Re: [389-devel] plugin PRE_ENTRY_FN scope

2014-01-17 Thread Rich Megginson
On 01/17/2014 11:20 AM, Deas, Jim wrote: Should I be able to use SLAPI_SEARCH_ATTR to view attributes about to be returned to the client in PRE_ENTRY_FN? Yes, looks like it, but you have to be prepared for the case where a client does not specify a search attribute list - in this case, the

Re: [389-devel] plugin PRE_ENTRY_FN scope

2014-01-17 Thread Rich Megginson
...@lists.fedoraproject.org] On Behalf Of Rich Megginson Sent: Friday, January 17, 2014 10:32 AM To: 389 Directory server developer discussion. Subject: Re: [389-devel] plugin PRE_ENTRY_FN scope On 01/17/2014 11:20 AM, Deas, Jim wrote: Should I be able to use SLAPI_SEARCH_ATTR to view attributes about

[389-devel] Please review: Ticket #47516 replication stops with excessive clock skew

2014-01-17 Thread Rich Megginson
https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/47516/0001-Ticket-47516-replication-stops-with-excessive-clock-.patch With the previous patch, the CSN generator was not updated. The server with the greater timestamp could issue update operations that the consumer could not overrule. With the

[389-devel] Please review: Ticket #47675 logconv errors when search has invalid bind dn

2014-01-16 Thread Rich Megginson
https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/47675/0001-Ticket-47675-logconv-errors-when-search-has-invalid-.patch -- 389-devel mailing list 389-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel

Re: [389-devel] plugin problem using slapi_entry_attr_find

2014-01-16 Thread Rich Megginson
On 01/16/2014 11:39 AM, Deas, Jim wrote: My bet, a rookie mistake. Am I forgetting to init a pointer etc??? Adding the line surrounded by ** in this routine makes dirsrv unstable and crashes it after a few queries. /* Registered preop_result routine */ int gnest_preop_results(

Re: [389-devel] plugin problem using slapi_entry_attr_find

2014-01-16 Thread Rich Megginson
the preop_result so I know if it’s proper to look for attributes? *From:*389-devel-boun...@lists.fedoraproject.org [mailto:389-devel-boun...@lists.fedoraproject.org] *On Behalf Of *Rich Megginson *Sent:* Thursday, January 16, 2014 11:29 AM *To:* 389 Directory server developer discussion. *Subject

Re: [389-devel] plugin problem using slapi_entry_attr_find

2014-01-16 Thread Rich Megginson
? JD *From:*389-devel-boun...@lists.fedoraproject.org [mailto:389-devel-boun...@lists.fedoraproject.org] *On Behalf Of *Rich Megginson *Sent:* Thursday, January 16, 2014 2:25 PM *To:* 389 Directory server developer discussion. *Subject:* Re: [389-devel] plugin problem using

[389-devel] Please review: Ticket #47674 various cleanup - multiple backends, legacy support

2014-01-15 Thread Rich Megginson
https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/47674 -- 389-devel mailing list 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel

[389-devel] Please review: Ticket #47657 add schema test suite and tests for Ticket #47634

2014-01-06 Thread Rich Megginson
https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/47657/0001-Ticket-47657-add-schema-test-suite-and-tests-for-Tic.patch -- 389-devel mailing list 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel

Re: [389-devel] ISO 8601 parser

2014-01-06 Thread Rich Megginson
On 12/23/2013 11:06 AM, Nathaniel McCallum wrote: https://www.redhat.com/archives/freeipa-devel/2013-December/msg00229.html 389ds may be interested in the ISO 8601 parser contained in the patch. It offers two main advantages to the one already contained in the 389ds tree: 1. It is*far* more

[389-devel] Please review: Ticket #47648 lib389 - add schema classes, methods

2013-12-19 Thread Rich Megginson
https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/47648/0001-Ticket-47648-lib389-add-schema-classes-methods.patch -- 389-devel mailing list 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel

[389-devel] Please review: lib389 - various cleanups

2013-12-18 Thread Rich Megginson
https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/47643 -- 389-devel mailing list 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel

[389-devel] Please review: fix various problems that cause a lot of valgrind noise

2013-12-18 Thread Rich Megginson
https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/47645/0001-fix-various-problems-that-cause-a-lot-of-valgrind-no.patch -- 389-devel mailing list 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel

Re: [389-devel] Regarding Microsoft announcemnt: MD5 deprecation on Microsoft Windows

2013-12-17 Thread Rich Megginson
Hi, As you would have noticed, Microsoft has announced for Deprecation of MD5 Hashing Algorithm for Microsoft Root Certificate Program. Is there any impact on us because of this decision with regards to WinSync part? No. Can somebody help me in giving some insight onto this? Regards,

[389-devel] Please review: Ticket #47631 objectclass may, must lists skip rest of objectclass once first is found in sup

2013-12-16 Thread Rich Megginson
https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/47631/0001-Ticket-47631-objectclass-may-must-lists-skip-rest-of.patch -- 389-devel mailing list 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel

[389-devel] Please review: take 2: Ticket #47623 fix memleak caused by 47347

2013-12-10 Thread Rich Megginson
https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/47623/0001-Ticket-47623-fix-memleak-caused-by-47347.patch -- 389-devel mailing list 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel

Re: FTBFS if -Werror=format-security flag is used

2013-12-09 Thread Rich Megginson
On 12/09/2013 03:33 PM, Przemek Klosowski wrote: On 12/06/2013 09:21 AM, Ralf Corsepius wrote: printf(string) is legitimate C, forcing printf(%s, string) is just silly. My apologies for being repetitive, but the original point is that printf(string) is insecure unless you can guarantee

[389-devel] Please review: Ticket #47623 fix memleak caused by 47347

2013-12-09 Thread Rich Megginson
https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/47623/0001-Ticket-47623-fix-memleak-caused-by-47347.patch -- 389-devel mailing list 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel

  1   2   3   4   5   >