Re: Modularity and the system-upgrade path

2019-10-11 Thread Robbie Harwood
Chris Murphy writes: > On Fri, Oct 11, 2019 at 6:57 AM Simo Sorce wrote: >> On Fri, 2019-10-11 at 09:56 +0200, Daniel Mach wrote: >>> On 10/7/19 8:55 PM, Simo Sorce wrote: I have to ask, given containers are so popular and can deal with any dependency without conflicting with system

Non-responsive maintainer: jamielinux

2019-10-11 Thread Robbie Harwood
Hello, In accordance with Fedora's non-responsive maintainer policy, I'm sending this message in attempt to contact Jamie Nguyen (jamielinux). Required non-responsive maintainer bug: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1760898 Open unaddressed bugs (219 in total):

Re: Non-responsive maintainer: awjb (Andreas Bierfert)

2019-10-10 Thread Robbie Harwood
Andreas Bierfert writes: > On Thu, 2019-10-10 at 14:23 -0400, Robbie Harwood wrote: >> Hello, >> >> In accordance with Fedora non-responsive maintainer policy, I'm >> sending this message in attempt to contact Andreas Bierfert (awjb). >> >> Required

Re: Non-responsive maintainer: awjb (Andreas Bierfert)

2019-10-10 Thread Robbie Harwood
... and that's the wrong list. My bad. Thanks, --Robbie signature.asc Description: PGP signature ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct:

Non-responsive maintainer: awjb (Andreas Bierfert)

2019-10-10 Thread Robbie Harwood
Hello, In accordance with Fedora non-responsive maintainer policy, I'm sending this message in attempt to contact Andreas Bierfert (awjb). Required non-responsive maintainer bug: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1760528 Open unaddressed bugs (53 in total):

Re: Modularity and the system-upgrade path

2019-10-08 Thread Robbie Harwood
Matthew Miller writes: > On Mon, Oct 07, 2019 at 03:20:21PM -0400, Alexander Scheel wrote: > >>> And where is the software for those containers coming from? Some >>> container registry like Docker Hub? One of the main points of >>> Modularity is to provide a trusted source of software to install

Re: Defining the future of the packager workflow in Fedora

2019-10-04 Thread Robbie Harwood
Pierre-Yves Chibon writes: > On Wed, Oct 02, 2019 at 03:17:33PM -0400, Robbie Harwood wrote: > >> With about six more emails about it, sure. And another piece of >> infrastructure that has to be up and bug-free. >> >> Even the gating and bodhi emails today

Re: Defining the future of the packager workflow in Fedora

2019-10-04 Thread Robbie Harwood
Björn Persson writes: > Panu Matilainen wrote: >> On 10/2/19 8:33 PM, Matthew Miller wrote: >>> On Wed, Oct 02, 2019 at 05:31:56PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: >>> > ○ Every changes to dist-git is done via pull-requests Erm, no thank you. Pull requests are a terrible

Re: Defining the future of the packager workflow in Fedora

2019-10-02 Thread Robbie Harwood
"Colin Walters" writes: > On Wed, Oct 2, 2019, at 1:40 PM, Fabio Valentini wrote: > >> As others in the thread have pointed out, mandatory pull requests >> just make no sense for most single-maintainer projects, which most >> packages probably are. > > Well, a lot of this relates to what the

Re: Fedora 31: Samba DC: "setup_kerberos_keys: generation of a des-cbc-md5 key failed: Bad encryption type"

2019-09-30 Thread Robbie Harwood
Dario Lesca writes: > I have fill this bug: > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1757071 > > This error happen into my test Samba DC MIT Kerberos environment > If you suggest to me some trick I can test it Single-DES support has been removed from krb5 as per

Re: Defining the future of the packager workflow in Fedora

2019-09-30 Thread Robbie Harwood
"Michael J Gruber" writes: > There is the current worklflow and the current mindset. One influences > the other. > > For a long-time gitter, the prevailing Fedora packager mindset is > still very much "dist-cvs". dist-git is often used as merely a tool to > drive "dist-something", not so much as

Re: Defining the future of the packager workflow in Fedora

2019-09-26 Thread Robbie Harwood
Pierre-Yves Chibon writes: > Here is what the vision we came to and that we would like to discuss: > > ○ Every changes to dist-git is done via pull-requests > ○ Pull-requests are automatically tested > ○ Every commit to dist-git (ie: PR merged) is automatically built in koji > ○ Every build in

Re: Unresponsive maintainers: Alex Chernyakhovsky & Othman Madjoudj

2019-09-23 Thread Robbie Harwood
Alex Chernyakhovsky writes: > Yeah, I have no idea how I missed that bug. But I've uploaded 1.3.2 > for all active branches and requested an epel8 branch, so that's all I > can do for now :) Appreciated. Thanks, --Robbie signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: Fedora in GNOME Online Accountes

2019-09-18 Thread Robbie Harwood
mcatanz...@gnome.org writes: > Robbie Harwood wrote: > >> Can you link the bug you've filed about this? > > I don't even know where to file a bug. Which component? kerberos? > xdg-desktop-portal? When filing bugs that you don't know the cause of, it's best to start w

Re: Fedora in GNOME Online Accountes

2019-09-18 Thread Robbie Harwood
mcatanz...@gnome.org writes: > Felipe Borges wrote: > >> The "Fedora" account is just a branded Kerberos account. By adding a >> Fedora account in GNOME Online Accounts you would get automatically >> signed on whenever you'd need to enter your FAS credentials. This >> means while accessing

Re: Unresponsive maintainers: Alex Chernyakhovsky & Othman Madjoudj

2019-09-04 Thread Robbie Harwood
Alex Chernyakhovsky writes: > On Wed, Sep 4, 2019 at 5:16 PM Alex Chernyakhovsky wrote: >> On Wed, Sep 4, 2019 at 3:33 PM Robbie Harwood wrote: >>> >>> Hi Fedora, >>> >>> I'm trying to contact Alex Chernyakhovsky and Othman Madjoudj, who >>>

Unresponsive maintainers: Alex Chernyakhovsky & Othman Madjoudj

2019-09-04 Thread Robbie Harwood
Hi Fedora, I'm trying to contact Alex Chernyakhovsky and Othman Madjoudj, who are the maintainers of mosh as far as I can tell. I have started the nonresponsive maintainer process due to lack of contact through bugzilla mail; bugs are https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1697355 and

Re: Fedora Samba DC for what purpose it is released in Fedora ?

2019-09-04 Thread Robbie Harwood
Alexander Bokovoy writes: > On ke, 04 syys 2019, alcir...@gmail.com wrote: >>On Mon, 2019-09-02 at 17:14 +0200, Dario Lesca wrote: >>> >>> After few minutes almost everything work well, except for a thing ... >>> all windows PC cannot access to others windows PC. >> >> Hey Dario. >> Since in

Re: Fedora Samba DC for what purpose it is released in Fedora ?

2019-09-03 Thread Robbie Harwood
Nico Kadel-Garcia writes: > Robbie Harwood wrote: >> Nico Kadel-Garcia writes: >>> Robert Marcano wrote: >>>> Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote: >>>>> Alexander Bokovoy wrote: >>>>>> Dario Lesca wrote: >>>>>>> Rob

Re: Fedora Samba DC for what purpose it is released in Fedora ?

2019-09-03 Thread Robbie Harwood
st alternatives systems (e.g., Debian) have had packages build against both; in my opinion this is more effort than it's worth. You end up exposing all the compatibility issues (libgssapi is standardized; libkrb5 is not; the ccache format is ad hoc best ef

Re: Join the new Minimization Team

2019-08-14 Thread Robbie Harwood
> Here's the scriptlet: > > %triggerun libs -- krb5-libs < 1.15.1-5 > if ! grep -q 'includedir /etc/krb5.conf.d' /etc/krb5.conf ; then > sed -i '1i # To opt out of the system crypto-policies > configuration of krb5, > remove the\n# symlink at /etc/krb5.conf.d/crypto-policies which will > not

Re: I wish to drop python2-Cython

2019-08-06 Thread Robbie Harwood
Miro Hrončok writes: > I'd like to drop python2-Cython subpackage from Cython, as I consider > it not needed, however there are still packages that buildrequire > it. Let me know if you want to maintain python2-Cython instead of me > and Igor. Hi, I believe you're CC'd on the thread with myself

Re: Rolling out Phase I of rawhide package gating

2019-07-24 Thread Robbie Harwood
> On Wed, Jul 24, 2019 at 11:30:45AM -0400, Robbie Harwood wrote: > > So we don't have an easy way to do this. I have a script that monitors the > entire pipeline/workflow in production and in staging. > I have been querying datagrepper for messages about the build that I've m

Re: Rolling out Phase I of rawhide package gating

2019-07-24 Thread Robbie Harwood
Pierre-Yves Chibon writes: > When you run `fedpkg build` on Rawhide, your package will be built in > a new koji tag (which will be the default target for Rawhide). The > package will be picked up from this koji tag, signed and moved onto a > second tag. Bodhi will be notified by koji once this

Re: Fedora 31 Self-Contained Change proposal: Limit Scriptlet Usage of core packages

2019-07-01 Thread Robbie Harwood
Ben Cotton writes: > == Detailed Description == > > Currently we know how to make an installable OS with packages that > doesn't require the use of scriptlets, indeed rpm-ostree and others > have already done this on a significantly bigger scale. So we plan to > remove direct scriptlets from

Re: How to install a mountpoint directory from an rpm?

2019-04-30 Thread Robbie Harwood
Many sites do intentionally, even - it's quite popular in University settings and in the financial sector. Nothing really drives that home like breaking support for it (which I'd like to say I've never done, but can't). Putting it anywhere other than /afs would be crazy - especially when /afs

Re: announcing HTTPS pushing to dist-git/src.fedoraproject.org for packagers and non-packagers

2019-04-24 Thread Robbie Harwood
> The 2FA scheme that we are solely planning to support is U2F/FIDO2, and to > the best of my knowledge there has so far not been any work on integrating > this with any krb5 server. It's not done, but I'm definitely working on this. We deployed

Re: F30 Self-Contained Change proposal: krb5 crypto modernization

2019-01-17 Thread Robbie Harwood
Jason L Tibbitts III writes: >>>>>> "RH" == Robbie Harwood writes: > > RH> If I backport this to fc29, will that assuage people's concerns? > > I think it would certainly help and I wouldn't complain. In fact, I'd > love to start running that

Re: F30 Self-Contained Change proposal: krb5 crypto modernization

2019-01-17 Thread Robbie Harwood
Jason L Tibbitts III writes: >>>>>> "RH" == Robbie Harwood writes: > > RH> Ah, I see, you're talking about the case when the enctype is already > RH> not permitted. That all makes sense then. > > Right. Basically, if any one of these: >

Re: F30 Self-Contained Change proposal: krb5 crypto modernization

2019-01-14 Thread Robbie Harwood
Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek writes: > On Tue, Jan 08, 2019 at 04:45:53PM -0600, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote: >> >>>>> "RH" == Robbie Harwood writes: >> >> RH> Ah, I see, you're talking about the case when the enctype is already >> RH> no

Re: F30 Self-Contained Change proposal: krb5 crypto modernization

2019-01-14 Thread Robbie Harwood
Tomasz Torcz writes: > On Mon, Jan 07, 2019 at 04:12:47PM -0500, Robbie Harwood wrote: >> Adam Williamson writes: >> >> > On Thu, 2019-01-03 at 22:40 -0600, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote: >> > >> >> But to be fair, MIT krb5 is not known for having grea

Re: F30 Self-Contained Change proposal: krb5 crypto modernization

2019-01-08 Thread Robbie Harwood
Jason L Tibbitts III writes: >>>>>> "RH" == Robbie Harwood writes: >>> >>> Well certainly there isn't much you can do to fix old principals on >>> existing systems. But the current versions should be complaining >>> loudly when

Re: F30 Self-Contained Change proposal: krb5 crypto modernization

2019-01-07 Thread Robbie Harwood
Jason L Tibbitts III writes: >>>>>> "RH" == Robbie Harwood writes: > > RH> I really don't think that "it won't work and there'll be error > RH> messages" is an "extremely optimistic description". > > But to be fair, MIT krb5

Re: F30 Self-Contained Change proposal: krb5 crypto modernization

2019-01-07 Thread Robbie Harwood
Adam Williamson writes: > On Thu, 2019-01-03 at 22:40 -0600, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote: > >> But to be fair, MIT krb5 is not known for having great error output. >> Not being able to start at all because the K/M has an enctype which is >> acceptable and not at all deprecated according to the

Re: F30 Self-Contained Change proposal: krb5 crypto modernization

2019-01-03 Thread Robbie Harwood
> BC> == Detailed Description == > > > Is it just me or does this not actually say clearly what is changing? > The first paragraph talks about two RFCs. The second paragraph talks > about how easy it is to break single DES. The third paragraph talks > about how disabled by default is

Re: F30 Self-Contained Change proposal: krb5 crypto modernization

2019-01-03 Thread Robbie Harwood
Raphael, I'm confused how this doesn't comply. Their source code lives here: https://github.com/h1kari/des_kpt Also, let's keep comments on this thread *and CC me* - then there's only one place to look for replies (and I'm not subscribed to this list). In any case, as I stated there, if you

Re: F30 Self-Contained Change proposal: krb5 crypto modernization

2019-01-03 Thread Robbie Harwood
Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos writes: > How does this ties with crypto policies? libkrb5 is already under > crypto policies and has these ciphers disabled by default. Is this > change about removing them from the code or removing them from the > capabilities of the KDC which is not covered by crypto

Intent to orphan krb5-appl*

2017-06-20 Thread Robbie Harwood
Hi, I am orphaning krb5-appl in Fedora in the hopes that it will be retired.

Re: Broken dependencies: perl-Authen-Krb5-Admin

2016-10-21 Thread Robbie Harwood
build...@fedoraproject.org writes: > perl-Authen-Krb5-Admin has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree: > On aarch64: > perl-Authen-Krb5-Admin-0.17-12.fc25.aarch64 requires > libkadm5clnt_mit.so.10()(64bit) > perl-Authen-Krb5-Admin-0.17-12.fc25.aarch64 requires >