On Fri, 2024-09-06 at 14:57 +0200, Simone Caronni wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 6, 2024 at 2:50 PM Sérgio Basto
> wrote:
> > I'd like to understand, so what in "X server 21.1" broke ? from
> > this
> > thread [1] only 340xx driver stopped to work , 390xx supports
On Fri, 2024-09-06 at 13:58 +0200, Neal Gompa wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 6, 2024 at 1:47 PM Sérgio Basto
> wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, 2024-09-05 at 18:54 +0200, Neal Gompa wrote:
> > > My understanding is the reason we hadn't was because of the
> > > NVIDIA
> &g
On Thu, 2024-09-05 at 18:54 +0200, Neal Gompa wrote:
> My understanding is the reason we hadn't was because of the NVIDIA
> binary driver. For the desktops that still use X11 and the X11 DDX
> instead of the modesetting driver, that could be a problem if the ABI
> broke.
Here it says, some NVIDIA
On Thu, 2024-09-05 at 22:41 +, Leigh Scott wrote:
> Neal Gompa wrote:
> > > My understanding is the reason we hadn't was because of the
> > > NVIDIA
> > binary driver.
>
> It doesn't matter if it breaks 340xx, it's in a poor state due to
> legacy drm removal.
X11 DDX was remove because, IIR
On Thu, 2024-09-05 at 16:54 +0200, Simone Caronni wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> I've noticed that we're really behind on xorg-x11-server releases
> (almost 3 years!) and that by rebasing we would drop tons of
> patches that have already been upstreamed during this time.
>
> No one that is listed in t
Hi,
Can someone approve my msg ?
Thank you
Forwarded Message
From: epel-announce-boun...@lists.fedoraproject.org
To: ser...@serjux.com
Subject: Your message to epel-annou...@lists.fedoraproject.org awaits
moderator approval
Date: 30/08/2024 16:16:55
Your mail to 'epel-annou...
On Tue, 2024-07-30 at 01:31 +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> On 30. 07. 24 1:20, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > I got build failure of pypy3.9 and pypy3.10 on x86_64 only, with:
> >
> > collect2: fatal error: cannot find ‘ld’
> > compilation terminated.
> >
> > See the CI results o
side-tag f41-build-side-92992 pushed to rawhide
sdrangel doesn't build due a problem with dependencies , gr-funcube
doesn't built with new fmt
On Thu, 2024-07-25 at 22:22 +0100, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> Hi,
>
> from
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2290312
&
Hi,
from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2290312
we will rebuild [1] on a side-tag f41-build-side-92992 except python-
torch I don't expect any problem
[1]
rawhide OpenImageIO
rawhide YafaRay
rawhide caffe
rawhide digikam
rawhide dtkmultimedia
rawhide frei0r-plugins
rawhide gmic
r
Hi,
On Thu, 2024-07-18 at 16:42 +0200, Germano Massullo wrote:
> Hello, I discussed the feasibility of packaging
> https://github.com/italia/cie-middleware-linux
> in Fedora devel Matrix channel with Cristian Le and xvitaly. With the
> help of Cristian Le I wrote the following [1] draft that will
On Mon, 2024-07-15 at 12:56 +0200, Mark E. Fuller via devel wrote:
> I want to make a minor update to an EPEL 8 package, but the default
> Python is 3.6 where the update requires >=3.7
>
> Is this possible to do (with modules?)? How would I specify it in the
> spec file if it is?
>
you have p
On Sun, 2024-07-14 at 12:29 -0500, Ian Pilcher wrote:
> On 7/13/24 4:39 AM, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> >
> >
> > if I don't like this functionality, can I have my vt consoles back
> > ?
> >
>
> It seems that you will need to compile your own kernel
if I don't like this functionality, can I have my vt consoles back ?
and please stop use the argument of the security , I don't know how
write it with nice words , but saying one untested software have better
security that an very old one is not fair to me , is just not a good
argument to me.
On Sat, 2024-07-06 at 08:06 -0400, Neal Gompa wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 6, 2024 at 7:55 AM Sérgio Basto
> wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, 2024-06-04 at 10:34 +0200, Hans de Goede wrote:
> > > Hi Ian,
> > >
> > > On 6/4/24 5:39 AM, Ian Laurie via devel wrote:
>
On Tue, 2024-06-04 at 10:34 +0200, Hans de Goede wrote:
> Hi Ian,
>
> On 6/4/24 5:39 AM, Ian Laurie via devel wrote:
> > On 6/1/24 1:04 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > > On Fri, 2024-05-31 at 13:36 +0200, Jiri Konecny wrote:
> > > > To my knowledge it shouldn't be. Fedora Workstation is already
> >
On Wed, 2024-07-03 at 18:02 +0200, Marián Konček wrote:
> > As many of you know, as packages change, so do their BuildRequires.
> > In
> > the current state, maintaining them requires some manual work from
> > the
> > maintainer.
> >
> > 1. So I got around the idea of a simple tool that checks f
On Sun, 2024-06-23 at 09:50 +, Leigh Scott wrote:
> How do I disable this?, it has made kerberos login much harder.
> I'm considering ditching provenpackager rights if that is a
> condition.
This (2FA) is not enforced or checked,
--
Sérgio M. B.
--
__
On Fri, 2024-05-31 at 07:58 +0200, Felix Schwarz wrote:
> also a huge thank you from my side.
> You did an excellent job to keep nodejs in Fedora!
I'd like send the same message
- also a huge thank you from my side.
- You did an excellent job to keep nodejs in Fedora
--
Sérgio M. B.
--
_
Hello,
I saw in key tasks: "Mass Rebuild: RPMs first, then modules", modules
aren't over ?
BTW we continue to receive CVE's bugzilla reports on modules for
nextcloud on epel 8 for example , how we stop that ?
Thank you
On Tue, 2024-06-18 at 09:46 +0100, Aoife Moloney wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
>
On Mon, 2024-06-17 at 14:00 -0400, Przemek Klosowski via devel wrote:
> On 6/17/24 02:39, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote:
> > On 16/06/2024 18:24, Aoife Moloney wrote:
> > > This release of Fedora Linux ships version 3 of the GNU Image
> > > Manipulation Program, with many new features and improved
On Mon, 2024-06-17 at 12:44 +0100, Aoife Moloney wrote:
> Wiki -
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/NvidiaInstallationWithSecureboot
> Discussion Thread -
> https://discussion.fedoraproject.org/t/f41-change-proposal-nvidia-driver-installation-with-secure-boot-support-self-contained/120330
>
On Tue, 2024-06-11 at 19:48 +0200, Marc Deop i Argemí wrote:
> On Tuesday 11 June 2024 14:52:19 CEST Sérgio Basto wrote:
>
> I had enough with you an your attitude. You have been abusing the
> good will
> and temperament of many Fedora contributors for too long. Somebody
> mus
On Tue, 2024-06-04 at 14:26 +0200, Jiri Konecny wrote:
> On 04. 06. 24 5:39, Ian Laurie via devel wrote:
> > On 6/1/24 1:04 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > > On Fri, 2024-05-31 at 13:36 +0200, Jiri Konecny wrote:
> > > > To my knowledge it shouldn't be. Fedora Workstation is already
> > > > running
On Mon, 2024-05-06 at 13:56 +0200, Florian Festi wrote:
> As this change does not affect the resulting binary packages an
> immediate rebuild is not needed. The change will "only" ensure the
> packages still build with the new version of RPM.
I think you should rebuild the packages because at the
On Fri, 2024-05-31 at 08:04 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Fri, 2024-05-31 at 13:36 +0200, Jiri Konecny wrote:
> > To my knowledge it shouldn't be. Fedora Workstation is already
> > running
> > on Wayland by default for quite some time and even Live ISO is
> > already
> > Wayland. To my knowl
On Sun, 2024-05-26 at 21:29 +0200, Robert-André Mauchin wrote:
> On 21/05/2024 15:53, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> > tl;dr I screwed up and accidentally made two critical mistakes:
> >
> > 1) Node.js 22 got into Rawhide as the default early. I'm not sure
> > of
> > how to back that out safely.
> > 2
On Fri, 2024-05-24 at 16:55 +0200, Dominik Wombacher wrote:
> [4] https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/pagure
good news and thanks, I want to test in my local machine, to do that I
need the package updated, please add some builds .
Best regards,
--
Sérgio M. B.
--
Hi,
Since the thread is in top posting, I will top posting too ...
I also saw a "Native stack trace" [1] on Rawhide on nodejs-electron [2]
Best regards,
[2]
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/sergiomb/electrons/build/7462286/
[1]
[432/39358] python3 ../../tools/polymer/html_to_wrapper.py
On Tue, 2024-04-23 at 12:06 +0200, Tomas Hrcka wrote:
> 1. Suitability for dist-git and src.fedoraproject.org replacement
Can someone explain me what is the problem of pagure ?
please join to
https://discussion.fedoraproject.org/t/2024-git-forge-evaluation/111795/20
Thanks
--
Sérgio M. B.
-
On Tue, 2024-05-14 at 14:53 +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> Hi,
>
> When is Fedora 38 going EOL?
>
> https://fedorapeople.org/groups/schedule/f-38/f-38-key-tasks.html say
> s today
> https://fedorapeople.org/groups/schedule/f-40/f-40-key-tasks.html say
> next week
>
> Which one is correct?
Bodhi s
On Sun, 2024-05-12 at 17:00 -0600, Neal Gompa wrote:
> On Sun, May 12, 2024 at 4:59 PM Sérgio Basto
> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/gimp3
> >
>
> What the heck? This should have been gimp2 for the old version, not
> gi
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/gimp3
On Wed, 2024-05-08 at 20:43 +0200, Josef Řídký wrote:
> I believe once the GIMP 3.0 is out the Fedora version will follow
> almost immediately.
>
> Josef
> GIMP co-maintainer
>
> Dne po 6. 5. 2024 22:13 uživatel Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
> naps
On Sat, 2024-05-04 at 07:53 +0200, Peter Boy wrote:
>
>
> > Am 04.05.2024 um 05:41 schrieb Sérgio Basto :
> >
> > Hi,
> > About this documentation [0], finally talks about rescue a
> > bootloader
> > with live images ... (but I will wrote about that i
Hi,
About this documentation [0], finally talks about rescue a bootloader
with live images ... (but I will wrote about that in another time)
I run in trouble on cloning a disk from an old computer and starting
booting on a new computer , security get the thing more complicated, I
had to disable
Hi,
wdune is FTBFS on F40 and FTI on F41 and I haven't time to fix it
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2261785
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2276277
Best regards,
--
Sérgio M. B.
--
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fe
On Wed, 2024-04-17 at 21:51 -0500, Michel Lind wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> protobuf was recently orphaned without any announcement to this list.
>
> I've picked it up since et depends on it.
>
Update protobuf is a huge task
see https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/protobuf/pull-request/26 ( move
from
On Mon, 2024-04-15 at 10:55 +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
>
> Anyone got any idea about this build failure?
>
I think is this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2263180
> https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=116395331
>
> [+] All set and ready to build.
> clang:
On Sun, 2024-04-07 at 15:15 +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> I'm revisting the topic of rpmautospec because I was doing some work
> on various packages, and it's annoying that some packages are using
> rpmautospec and others are not.
>
> All my packages have been conve
On Fri, 2024-03-08 at 16:19 +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> For mingw-* packages we (sometimes) have a separate package from the
> native package, eg. libgcrypt vs mingw-libgcrypt. Therefore two
> different packages are sometimes built with the exact same sources.
>
> However I discovered copy
Hi,
Some days ago I notice that shogun-data still in Fedora [1] but shogun
is retired for 4 years [2], just run `fedpkg retire DESCRIPTION` is
enough ?
Thank you,
[1]
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/shogun-data
[2]
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/shogun
--
Sérgio M. B.
--
_
On Tue, 2024-03-19 at 14:22 +0100, Allan via devel wrote:
> På Tue, 19 Mar 2024 09:09:26 -0400
> "Garry T. Williams" skrev:
> > On Monday, March 18, 2024 4:46:01 PM EDT Sérgio Basto wrote:
> > > On Mon, 2024-03-18 at 16:17 -0400, Garry T. Williams wrote:
> >
On Mon, 2024-03-18 at 16:17 -0400, Garry T. Williams wrote:
> On Wednesday, February 7, 2024 4:06:46 AM EDT Kevin Kofler via devel
> wrote:
> > Garry T. Williams wrote:
> > > I hope my report can be resolved before I am forced to use
> > > Wayland.
> >
> > You will not be forced to use Wayland. St
vips-8.15.1-4.fc41
webkit2gtk4.0-2.42.5-3.fc41
webkitgtk-2.43.4-5.fc41
xine-lib-1.2.13-13.fc41
On Wed, 2024-03-13 at 01:39 +, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> new try, now with version 0.10.2
>
> side-tag: f41-build-side-85651
>
>
> On Wed, 2024-02-14 at 16:14 -0600, Micha
new try, now with version 0.10.2
side-tag: f41-build-side-85651
On Wed, 2024-02-14 at 16:14 -0600, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 14 2024 at 09:38:39 PM +00:00:00, Sérgio Basto
> wrote:
> > I found "cc1plus: out of memory allocating 603 bytes after a
> >
On Mon, 2024-03-11 at 15:11 +0100, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 11, 2024, 04:07 Jerry James wrote:
> > On Sun, Mar 10, 2024 at 10:38 AM Orion Poplawski
> > wrote:
> > > I'm starting to see this building perl-Alien-CFITSIO in F40 (not
> > > rawhide):
> > >
> > > + cd Alien-CFITSIO-v4.4.0.
On Thu, 2024-03-07 at 11:15 +, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> On Thu, 2024-03-07 at 10:27 +, Barry Scott wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > On 21/02/2024 07:11, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > dnf --releasever=40 --setopt=module_plat
On Thu, 2024-03-07 at 10:27 +, Barry Scott wrote:
>
>
>
>
> On 21/02/2024 07:11, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
>
> >
> > dnf --releasever=40 --setopt=module_platform_id=platform:f40 \
> > --enablerepo=updates-testing \
> > $(rpm -q fedora-repos-modular >/dev/null && echo --
> > enablerepo=up
On Tue, 2024-03-05 at 21:36 +, Ryan Bach via devel wrote:
> > The Fedora gstreamer maintainers regularly and actively update and
> > maintain the GST stack, I'm not sure what a message with just a
> > link
> > provides, did you have a particular query you wanted answered about
> > the release i
On Tue, 2024-03-05 at 03:28 +, Ryan Bach via devel wrote:
> https://www.phoronix.com/news/GStreamer-1.24-Released
AFAIK Fedora can't have H264 neither H265 decoding or encoding because
these codecs are patented and have royalties and you don't have way to
get around.
The solution is to use f
On Thu, 2024-02-29 at 19:19 +0900, Mamoru TASAKA wrote:
> Petr Pisar wrote on 2024/02/29 18:35:
> > V Thu, Feb 29, 2024 at 10:02:32AM +0100, Jos de Kloe napsal(a):
> > > Dear all,
> > >
> > > while doing koji builds for the latest eccodes version 2.34.1 I
> > > ran in to an
> > > issue that is puz
On Sat, 2024-02-24 at 09:47 +0100, Ralf Corsépius wrote:
>
>
> Am 24.02.24 um 01:36 schrieb Samuel Sieb:
> > On 2/23/24 15:38, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> > > On Sat, 2024-02-24 at 00:06 +0100, Ralf Corsépius wrote:
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
On Sat, 2024-02-24 at 00:06 +0100, Ralf Corsépius wrote:
>
>
> Am 23.02.24 um 22:37 schrieb Samuel Sieb:
> > On 2/23/24 10:50, Ralf Corsépius wrote:
> > >
> > > # dnf system-upgrade download --releasever=40
> > > ...
> > > No match for group package "multican"
> > > ...
> > >
> > > WTH?
> >
>
On Fri, 2024-02-23 at 12:57 -0500, Stephen Smoogen wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, 23 Feb 2024 at 08:04, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> > On Thu, 2024-02-22 at 20:36 -0500, Neal Gompa wrote:
> > > On Thu, Feb 22, 2024 at 8:32 PM Sérgio Basto
> >
> > > No. This is one of tho
On Fri, 2024-02-23 at 09:17 -0500, Neal Gompa wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 23, 2024 at 8:04 AM Sérgio Basto
> wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, 2024-02-22 at 20:36 -0500, Neal Gompa wrote:
> > > On Thu, Feb 22, 2024 at 8:32 PM Sérgio Basto
> > > wrote:
> > > >
On Thu, 2024-02-22 at 20:36 -0500, Neal Gompa wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 22, 2024 at 8:32 PM Sérgio Basto
> wrote:
> >
> > On Sun, 2024-01-28 at 20:14 +, Neal Gompa wrote:
> > > On Sun, Jan 28, 2024 at 7:54 PM Gary Buhrmaster
> > > wrote:
> > > >
On Thu, 2024-02-22 at 16:28 -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Thu, 2024-02-22 at 15:32 -0700, Orion Poplawski wrote:
> > I've seeing:
> >
> > INFO:anaconda.modules.payloads.payload.dnf.transaction_progress:Ins
> > talled:
> > glibc-common-2.39.9000-
> > 1.fc41.x86_64 1708040026
> > e4113ddcb7a4bf
On Sun, 2024-01-28 at 20:14 +, Neal Gompa wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 28, 2024 at 7:54 PM Gary Buhrmaster
> wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Dec 20, 2023 at 7:54 PM Aoife Moloney
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > Wiki -> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Unify_bin_and_sbin
> > >
> >
> > One additional item to c
On Sun, 2024-02-18 at 23:45 +0100, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 18, 2024 at 4:25 PM Michael J Gruber
> wrote:
> >
>
> (snip)
>
> >
> > I see this somehow connected to the discussion about signing keys
> > that
> > we had recently. A radical solution would be: branch rawhide, not
> > fr
On Fri, 2024-02-16 at 14:01 +0100, Florian Weimer wrote:
> * Orion Poplawski:
>
> > It seems that numpy is defining a uint32_t type as long unsigned
> > int
> > on i686, while glibc(?) is defining it as unsigned int. Now what
> > puzzles me a little is that on i686 aren't these both 4-byte
> > in
On Wed, 2024-02-14 at 15:38 +, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> On Wed, 2024-02-14 at 13:38 +, Mikhail Gavrilov wrote:
> > Why branched config pointed to rolling config?
> > # ls -ln | grep fedora-40
> > lrwxrwxrwx. 1 0 135 26 Jan 11 20:46 fedora-40-aarch64.cfg ->
> &
On Wed, 2024-02-14 at 12:57 -0600, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
>
> I checked the build log for
> https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=113473592 but
> unfortunately I don't actually see any error message. I searched for
> "error:" (indicating a compiler error) and I also searched for
On Wed, 2024-02-14 at 16:41 +0100, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 14, 2024 at 2:53 PM Sérgio Basto
> wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, 2024-02-09 at 13:28 +, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > > I will start a mass rebuild [1] in a side-tag, very soon , the
On Wed, 2024-02-14 at 13:38 +, Mikhail Gavrilov wrote:
> Why branched config pointed to rolling config?
> # ls -ln | grep fedora-40
> lrwxrwxrwx. 1 0 135 26 Jan 11 20:46 fedora-40-aarch64.cfg ->
> fedora-rawhide-aarch64.cfg
> lrwxrwxrwx. 1 0 135 23 Jan 11 20:46 fedora-40-i386.cfg -> fedora-
On Fri, 2024-02-09 at 13:28 +, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> Hi,
> I will start a mass rebuild [1] in a side-tag, very soon , the goal
> is
> finish and merge it before branch of Fedora 40, please let me know we
> have any objection that prevent to proceeding.
>
As we already h
On Fri, 2024-02-09 at 16:53 +, Gary Buhrmaster wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 9, 2024 at 4:23 PM Sérgio Basto
> wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > I'd like to bring to your attention that Fedora would benefit with
> > update of exiv2 [1] and protobuf [2] but these p
Hi,
I'd like to bring to your attention that Fedora would benefit with
update of exiv2 [1] and protobuf [2] but these packages have lots of
dependencies and the update of the dependent packages is not trivial .
tips, ideas and opinions ? to do these soname updates
thank you
[1]
https://src.fe
Hi,
I will start a mass rebuild [1] in a side-tag, very soon , the goal is
finish and merge it before branch of Fedora 40, please let me know we
have any objection that prevent to proceeding.
Best regards,
[1]
dnf repoquery --disablerepo=* --enablerepo={rpmfusion-{non,}free-,}rawhide
--whatrequ
On Fri, 2024-02-09 at 13:21 +0100, Marc Deop i Argemí wrote:
> On Friday, 9 February 2024 11:53:01 CET Sérgio Basto wrote:
> > so you agree that are giving the overhead to us (the people who
> > want
> > keep X11 as it is )
>
> Yes!!! OF COURSE!
>
> If you wan
On Thu, 2024-02-08 at 22:04 -0500, Steve Cossette wrote:
> I
> On Thu, Feb 8, 2024 at 9:51 PM Sérgio Basto
> wrote:
> > On Thu, 2024-02-08 at 20:43 +0100, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> > > On Thu, Feb 8, 2024 at 12:33 PM Sérgio Basto
> > > wrote:
> > > &g
On Thu, 2024-02-08 at 20:43 +0100, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 8, 2024 at 12:33 PM Sérgio Basto
> wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, 2024-02-07 at 16:03 +0100, Marc Deop i Argemí wrote:
> > > We are not banning nor deleting anything. We are not _supporting_
> > >
On Tue, 2024-02-06 at 16:06 +0100, Frantisek Zatloukal wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, Feb 6, 2024 at 3:55 PM Sérgio Basto
> wrote:
> > On Tue, 2024-02-06 at 15:43 +0100, Frantisek Zatloukal wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > On Tue, Feb 6, 2024 at 1:50 PM Sérgio Bast
On Wed, 2024-02-07 at 16:03 +0100, Marc Deop i Argemí wrote:
> We are not banning nor deleting anything. We are not _supporting_ it.
you are removing X11 from the builds deliberately , when
many people , members of Fedora on devel mailing list, express that
they want have X11 , in fact we have m
On Wed, 2024-01-24 at 17:56 +0100, Lumír Balhar wrote:
> Hello.
>
> Today I found out an interesting difference between Koji and COPR.
> autowrap package has this in its specfile:
>
> Requires: python%{python3_pkgversion}-Cython%{?_isa}
>
> Which is incorrect for noarch package but hold on. The
On Tue, 2024-02-06 at 12:30 -0500, Yaakov Selkowitz wrote:
> On Tue, 2024-02-06 at 12:48 +0000, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> > On Mon, 2024-02-05 at 20:36 +0000, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> > > On Sun, 2024-02-04 at 19:59 +, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
On Tue, 2024-02-06 at 15:43 +0100, Frantisek Zatloukal wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, Feb 6, 2024 at 1:50 PM Sérgio Basto
> wrote:
> > Mass rebuild finished and merge to rawhide [1].
> > Packages player and MLT are already FTBFS on Rawhide so I didn't
> > touch
> &g
On Mon, 2024-02-05 at 20:36 +, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> On Sun, 2024-02-04 at 19:59 +0000, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I will start a mass rebuild in a side-tag, very soon , the goal is
> > finish and merge it before branch of Fedora 40, please let me know
>
On Sun, 2024-02-04 at 19:59 +, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I will start a mass rebuild in a side-tag, very soon , the goal is
> finish and merge it before branch of Fedora 40, please let me know we
> have any thing that prevent to proceeding.
>
mass rebuild started on s
On Sun, 2024-02-04 at 03:55 +0100, Kevin Kofler via devel wrote:
> Neal Gompa wrote:
> > It's extremely obvious that people want to use it. You replied to
> > someone who did and denigrated their opinion. Frankly, I'm
> > disappointed in your response as well as the tone of you and Kevin.
>
> I ca
Hi,
I will start a mass rebuild in a side-tag, very soon , the goal is
finish and merge it before branch of Fedora 40, please let me know we
have any thing that prevent to proceeding.
Best regards,
--
Sérgio M. B.
--
___
devel mailing list -- devel@li
On Fri, 2024-02-02 at 14:42 +0100, Kevin Kofler via devel wrote:
> Peter Hutterer wrote:
> > Fedora still ships the previous release, server 1.20.x
>
> So should we not upgrade that to the latest upstream release (Xorg
> 21.0)?
I'm working on one pull request
https://src.fedoraproject.org/for
On Fri, 2024-02-02 at 01:34 -0600, Jonathan Bennett via devel wrote:
> Hey folks, outside observer, and long-time Fedora user weighing in
> with
> some thoughts. First off, I've been hyped to see Fedora lead the way
> with finally making a real move to Wayland, and retire X11. And now
> I'm
> fa
On Thu, 2024-02-01 at 15:31 +0100, Leon Fauster via devel wrote:
> Am 01.02.24 um 14:18 schrieb Sérgio Basto:
>
>
> > The problem is not KDE SIG not support X11, the problem is KDE SIG
> > want
> > drop X11 and force user to use wayland .
>
>
> Looking from
ht
> not have helped. What I'm trying to say basically is, I get that for
> some legacy nvidia users the Wayland experience may not be optimal.
> But will it ever be? Does that mean we can never drop x11? Will
> anyone ever update those legacy nvidia drivers
On Tue, 2024-01-30 at 09:57 -0500, Steven A. Falco wrote:
> On 1/30/24 08:55 AM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> > On Tue, Jan 30, 2024 at 08:38:51AM -0500, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> > > 3) Fedora has a long-standing and well-communicated stance that
> > > we are
> > > a Wayland distribution first and
On Mon, 2024-01-29 at 16:33 -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On 2024-01-29 16:00, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> >
> > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/Versioning/#_rawhide_is_allowed_to_lag_temporarily
> >
> > you may do a new build with lower EVR
Link to the FESCo ticket: https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/3165
and I'm very upset
--
Sérgio M. B.
--
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
ht
On Mon, 2024-01-29 at 15:43 -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
> nirik ran a script that checks for versioning issues in Rawhide
> today,
> and it found several:
> https://pagure.io/releng/issue/11922#comment-893797
>
> Some of these followed a pattern, so I figured a reminder was in
> order.
> In al
On Sun, 2024-01-28 at 15:57 -0600, Richard Shaw wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 28, 2024 at 9:55 AM Ben Beasley
> wrote:
> > Blender already excludes i686:
> >
> > https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/blender/blob/8088da10c20e53ab0e1dd5de6fd3a2344bd288aa/f/blender.spec#_207
> >
> > So does prusa-slicer:
> >
Hi,
Unfortunately, I pushed the commit to rawhide when I just wanted just
it to my fork first and make one PR.
Anyway, lxc was ready to go and also lxc is a leaf package so the
impact should be small (otherwise it would have already reverted it).
So I triggered the build but if there is any in
Hi,
MLT failed to build [2] with [1] , what do you suggest ?
Best regards,
[1]
builddir/build/BUILD/mlt-7.22.0/src/modules/gdk/pixops.c: In function
‘scale_line_22_yuv’:
/builddir/build/BUILD/mlt-7.22.0/src/modules/gdk/pixops.c:188:1:
internal compiler error: in backward_pass, at tree-vect-slp
On Wed, 2024-01-24 at 17:38 +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> lmms thm
I fixed the build , I base it on opensuse packages
https://build.opensuse.org/package/rdiff/openSUSE:Backports:SLE-15-SP6/lmms?linkrev=base&rev=9
> lxc hguemar, sag
On Wed, 2024-01-24 at 05:05 -0500, Neal Gompa wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 24, 2024 at 5:01 AM Miroslav Suchý
> wrote:
> >
> > Dne 24. 01. 24 v 10:51 Aoife Moloney napsal(a):
> > >
> > > All other milestones remain the same at this time and the
> > > published schedule[4] has been updated to reflect the
On Fri, 2024-01-19 at 15:50 +0530, Samyak Jain wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Per the Fedora Linux f40 schedule [1] we started a mass rebuild on
> 2024-01-17 for Fedora f40 but due to various reasons such as dnf
> issues, and other side-tags not getting merged we had to stop it.
> But we finally managed to
On Thu, 2024-01-18 at 09:13 -0700, Jerry James wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 16, 2024 at 3:32 PM Sérgio Basto
> wrote:
> > You got mass rebuild script here [1] in massrebuildsinfo.py [2] you
> > may
> > define what packages you are going to rebuild , in line 93 of
> > mass-
On Fri, 2024-01-19 at 00:21 +, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> On Fri, 19 Jan 2024 at 00:10, Jonathan Wakely
> wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, 17 Jan 2024 at 19:07, Jonathan Wakely
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > I'll be building boost, tbb, and the packages that depend on them
> > > in
> > > the f40-build-side-816
On Tue, 2024-01-16 at 14:50 -0700, Jerry James wrote:
> Given the problems we had with font packages not being rebuilt in the
> last mass rebuild, can we ensure that the mass rebuild script uses
> "git push --no-verify" instead of plain "git push"?
>
> See:
> - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug
On Mon, 2024-01-15 at 14:01 +0100, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> Hi!
>
> The f40-build-side-81394 side-tag contains new
> gcc, annobin, libtool and redhat-rpm-config for f40, meant to be
> tagged into rawhide shortly before the mass rebuild.
>
> If there is anything you'd like to rebuild against it befo
On Thu, 2023-12-07 at 11:41 +0100, Michal Schorm wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 7, 2023 at 11:21 AM Florian Weimer
> wrote:
> > Asking individual maintainers for trivial changes does not scale.
> > The
> > alternative would be not to address FTBFS and other build issues,
> > maybe
> > file bugs, and rely o
On Fri, 2023-12-01 at 16:26 +0100, Michael J Gruber wrote:
> So, due to me following my package (notmuch) upstream and testing
> early against upstream's git, reporting and working with upstream, I
> noticed a FTBFS and helped fixing it. Nothing urgent since it was
> basically just a test failing f
On Thu, 2023-11-23 at 20:40 +0100, Florian Weimer wrote:
> * Mattia Verga via devel:
>
> > Il 23/11/23 16:40, Florian Weimer ha scritto:
> > > I've got an update that I don't see pushed to stable. How do I
> > > make
> > > sure that doesn't happen?
> > >
> > > As it's for rawhide, I didn't creat
1 - 100 of 1025 matches
Mail list logo
