Re: Network Interface Names in saved firewall rules
On Tue, 29 Jan 2013 13:58:30 -0500, Bill Nottingham wrote: Tomasz Torcz (to...@pipebreaker.pl) said: If I understand right, there is not guarantee em1 would become eno1 in 100% of cases. Iptables saved config would still need to be checked and verified. It won't, but having it be the same in the case where it *does* have the same idea as biosdevname of 'first embedded interface', it could be useful to have the same name. One way to handle this: when firewall rules are saved through firewalld (or iptables-services), it should also ask NetworkManager to save the network device names involved by their MAC addresses. Except when it knows a MAC address wouldn't be stable (e.g. tun/tap device with a kernel generated MAC address) or when running in a VM. The kernel could help in identifying devices would unstable MAC addresses. Just a documented and supported way to avoid reconfiguring the firewall on Fedora upgrade when network device name policy could potentially change would also help. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: gcc-4.7 build issue
On Wed, 25 Jan 2012 17:30:57 +, Scott Tsai wrote: Alain, once the boost-polygon / gcc-4.7 bug in RHBZ 784654 is fixed you can pull the packaging changes from https://www.gitorious.org/fedora- packages/kicad/ In case you want to update kicad to the latest bzr revision, I've uploaded: http://scottt.tw/fedora/kicad-eeschema-boost-1.47-build-fix.patch That's the same remove some const declarations to make code using boost::ptr_vector build fix but against latest upstream BZR. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Review swaps
On Tue, 20 Dec 2011 14:27:07 -0700, Jerry James wrote: gap https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=756635 I'll trade you js-of-ocaml: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=767042 for gap. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Any interest in an or1ksim package?
On Mon, 05 Dec 2011 02:02:27 -0500, Jon Masters wrote: Anyone interested in an or1ksim package for Fedora? I'm interested and I'm willing to do the package review. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
