Re: Searching a new home for my packages

Am Mo., 31. Aug. 2020 um 15:29 Uhr schrieb Nikola Forró : > On Thu, 2020-07-16 at 15:37 +0200, Nikola Forró wrote: > > On Sat, 2020-06-13 at 13:54 +0200, Thomas Spura wrote: > > > Any takers for: > > > - *python-mglob* and/or *python-minimock *(instead of retiring

Re: Searching a new home for my packages

Am So., 14. Juni 2020 um 09:08 Uhr schrieb Remi Collet < fed...@famillecollet.com>: > Hi, > > Le 12/06/2020 à 21:37, Thomas Spura a écrit : > > - php-zmq > > I can take this one. > Thanks, done! Best Thomas -- Fedora: https://fedor

Re: Searching a new home for my packages

Am Fr., 12. Juni 2020 um 23:54 Uhr schrieb Miro Hrončok : > > and hope I didn't forget one, if so, please let me know > > I found python-mglob python-minimock python-zmq scipy zeromq Thank you! mglob and minimock does not seem in use anymore, and I asked here for maintainers or to simply

Re: Searching a new home for my packages

Am Fr., 12. Juni 2020 um 23:44 Uhr schrieb Elliott Sales de Andrade < quantum.anal...@gmail.com>: > On Fri, 12 Jun 2020 at 17:39, Miro Hrončok wrote: > > > > On 12. 06. 20 21:37, Thomas Spura wrote: > > > Hi all, > > > > > > unfortunately, I don'

Searching a new home for my packages

Hi all, unfortunately, I don't find much time anymore to look for my packages .. Due to that, I would like to step down as the primary maintainer and am searching for a new home for my packages! On most of them, I am co-maintainer and the following are the ones, where I am maintainer (and hope I

Orphaning python-mglob/python-minimock

Hi all, I would like to orphan these two packages, because as far as I know, nothing requires it currently. I used to package both for ipython dependencies, but they don't seem to be needed anymore. *python-minimock:* Seems not in use anymore: - dnf repoquery --whatrequires python3-minimock /

Re: Elliott Sales de Andrade (qulogic) is now in python{,-packagers}-sig

Miro Hrončok schrieb am Sa., 6. Okt. 2018, 06:54: > Welcome \o/ > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Qulogic > > Welcome Elliott! :) ___ python-devel mailing list -- python-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to

Re: ipykernel to recommend stuff?

Christian Dersch schrieb am Mi., 5. Apr. 2017 um 11:19 Uhr: > On 04/05/2017 11:03 AM, Miro Hrončok wrote: > > > > OK, proposal: > > > > Recommend from pythonX-ipykernel: > > > > pythonX-matplotlib > > pythonX-numpy > > pythonX-pandas > > pythonX-scipy > >

Re: Soon retirement of zeromq2 and zeromq3

Petr Pisar <ppi...@redhat.com> schrieb am Mo., 14. Nov. 2016 um 10:32 Uhr: > On Sun, Nov 13, 2016 at 10:40:43AM +0000, Thomas Spura wrote: > > The current dependencies are: > > # dnf repoquery --whatrequires zeromq2 --alldeps > > perl-ZMQ-LibZMQ2-0:1.09-7.fc23.x86_6

Soon retirement of zeromq2 and zeromq3

Hi all, zeromq2 and zeromq3 were additional/compat packages that made it possible to ship multiple versions of zeromq (namely the old versions 2 and 3). These days, they don't get any bugfixes anymore and the version 4 should be used were possible. There should have been enough time to port all

Soon retirement of zeromq2 and zeromq3

Hi all, zeromq2 and zeromq3 were additional/compat packages that made it possible to ship multiple versions of zeromq (namely the old versions 2 and 3). These days, they don't get any bugfixes anymore and the version 4 should be used were possible. There should have been enough time to port all

Re: ipython 4 and Jupyter

Jonathan Underwood <jonathan.underw...@gmail.com> schrieb am Mo., 18. Apr. 2016 um 12:04 Uhr: > On 18 April 2016 at 08:06, Thomas Spura <toms...@fedoraproject.org> wrote: > > Any help on reviewing new packages for ipython/jupyter and > (co-)maintaining > >

Re: ipython 4 and Jupyter

Jonathan Underwood <jonathan.underw...@gmail.com> schrieb am Mo., 18. Apr. 2016 um 12:04 Uhr: > On 18 April 2016 at 08:06, Thomas Spura <toms...@fedoraproject.org> wrote: > > Any help on reviewing new packages for ipython/jupyter and > (co-)maintaining > >

Re: ipython 4 and Jupyter

Philippe Makowski schrieb am So., 17. Apr. 2016 um 19:29 Uhr: > Hi, > > just in case, I started to package ipython 4 and Jupyter in Mageia.. > my progress is there https://wiki.mageia.org/en/User:Philippem > > may be it could help for Fedora. > Thank you for your

Re: libsodium soname bump in rawhide/F24

Remi Collet schrieb am Mo., 7. März 2016, 16:11: > Le 07/03/2016 12:34, Remi Collet a écrit : > > Hi > > > > I'm upgrading libsodium from 1.0.5 (soname 13) to 1.0.8 (soname 18) > > > > I will also rebuild dependent packages: > > > > - fastd > > - usbguard > > - zeromq >

Re: Python naming guidelines clarification

Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek schrieb am Do., 21. Jan. 2016 um 16:50 Uhr: > On Thu, Jan 21, 2016 at 02:36:00PM +0100, Jan Včelák wrote: > > On Thu, Jan 21, 2016 at 2:12 PM, Robert Kuska wrote: > > >> And what is the best current practice if the library

Re: matplotlib 1.5.0 tagged

The current matplotlib maintainer is happily accepting co-maintainers :) So feel free to submit a review request for cycler or even better help Thomas to create one to become the maintainer of his own (upstream) package. Best, Thomas Neal Becker schrieb am Fr., 30. Okt.

Re: display state of package generation on KOJI

Joachim Backes schrieb am Di., 27. Okt. 2015 um 07:46 Uhr: > Hi developers, > > sometimes I'm searching for new packages on KOJI, for example for new > kernels, but I see only a "Finished" column (beside others) on the > specific website. It would be helpful if the

Re: Orphaned packages available for new point of contact

Kalev Lember <kalevlem...@gmail.com> schrieb am So., 13. Sep. 2015 um 13:37 Uhr: > On 09/09/2015 10:10 PM, Thomas Spura wrote: > > I retired ScientificPython as it does require an older numpy and doesn't > > build anytime soon with the current numpy and will be FTBFS for

Re: Orphaned packages available for new point of contact

Matěj Cepl schrieb am Do., 10. Sep. 2015 um 12:56 Uhr: > On 2015-09-10, 09:24 GMT, Mathieu Bridon wrote: > > On Thu, 2015-09-10 at 11:16 +0200, Matěj Cepl wrote: > >> On 2015-09-09, 19:37 GMT, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > >> > pytz > >> > python-dateutil > >> > >> I see these two as too

Re: Orphaned packages available for new point of contact

Jon Ciesla schrieb am Mi., 9. Sep. 2015 um 22:06 Uhr: > > > On Wed, Sep 9, 2015 at 2:37 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > >> Greetings. > > >> >> I have orphaned packages that formerly had a point of contact of >> jspaleta. >> >> > Bummer. :( > Indeed... > I

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] FTBFS Packages in rawhide (2015-07-27)

Orion Poplawski or...@cora.nwra.com schrieb am Di., 28. Juli 2015 um 01:31 Uhr: On 07/27/2015 12:15 PM, Orion Poplawski wrote: On 07/27/2015 01:51 AM, Thomas Spura wrote: opensou...@till.name mailto:opensou...@till.name schrieb am Mo., 27. Juli 2015 um 09:19 Uhr: The following

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] FTBFS Packages in rawhide (2015-07-27)

opensou...@till.name schrieb am Mo., 27. Juli 2015 um 09:19 Uhr: The following packages did not build for two releases and will be retired before the Alpha Freeze, unless someone takes care of them. If you know for sure that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper

Re: [Fedora-packaging] build failure - Failed to create the file ./: Is a directory

David Timms dti...@iinet.net.au schrieb am Do., 25. Juni 2015 um 14:04 Uhr: trying on -devel On 25/06/15 02:06, David Timms wrote: I haven't seen this one before. I'm fixing up my first mistake which was that adding the new source file to look-aside dropped the audacity-manual zip entry

Heads up: soname bump of zeromq in rawhide

I plan to build zeromq-4.1.2 in rawhide later this week which bumps the soname. I'll also rebuild the dependencies of it: # dnf repoquery --disablerepo=* --enablerepo=rawhide --whatrequires libzmq.so.4()(64bit) Last metadata expiration check performed 0:19:12 ago on Sun Jun 21 22:58:01 2015.

Re: Apps using default Python in Fedora vs. EPEL

Nick Coghlan ncogh...@gmail.com schrieb am Do., 26. Feb. 2015 um 00:14 Uhr: On 5 February 2015 at 17:48, Nick Coghlan ncogh...@gmail.com wrote: On 4 February 2015 at 21:01, Bohuslav Kabrda bkab...@redhat.com wrote: - Original Message - I don't really feel strongly about this, I

Re: python-sig and retiring python3-dateutil

Pete Travis m...@petetravis.com schrieb am Mon Jan 26 2015 at 5:24:32 PM: On 01/26/2015 08:53 AM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: Hi, since bug #1126521 seems to be progressing nicely, I think it would be nice to get in touch with python-sig, the maintainers of python3-dateutil,

Re: Review swap

Jerry James loganje...@gmail.com schrieb am Mon Dec 01 2014 at 9:12:13 PM: CVC4 has a new version with a new dependency. How about yet another review swap, this time for abc: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1169492 Let me know what I can review in exchange. Thanks, Taken.

[perl-ZMQ-LibZMQ2] zeromq-2 moved to zeromq2

commit f915f53c7e4709a963be9571cba65bec0dc55490 Author: Thomas Spura thomas.sp...@gmail.com Date: Mon Nov 17 10:32:57 2014 +0100 zeromq-2 moved to zeromq2 perl-ZMQ-LibZMQ2.spec |7 +-- 1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) --- diff --git a/perl-ZMQ-LibZMQ2.spec b/perl

Re: distutils does not find g++ on Fedora 20

Do you have the file /usr/libexec/gcc/x86_64-redhat-linux/4.8.2/cc1plus on your system as that's called from gcc later on. It seems your installation broke, so maybe that file is gone now. What is the output of yum reinstall gcc-c++? You only wrote you got errors... Brad Bell bradb...@seanet.com

[zeromq] update to version 4 in rawhide

Dear zeromq users, I'll update the zeromq package to version 4 next week in rawhide, which will break all existing packages that depend on the current zeromq package as there have been quite some changes [1]. It is recommend to upgrade to version 4, yet given the list of packages, it might take

Re: [zeromq] update to version 4 in rawhide

Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com schrieb am Fri Nov 14 2014 at 2:46:02 PM: On 2014-11-14, Thomas Spura toms...@fedoraproject.org wrote: I'll update the zeromq package to version 4 next week in rawhide, which will break all existing packages that depend on the current zeromq package

Re: python-sig in pkgdb2?

2014-10-07 9:10 GMT+02:00 Bohuslav Kabrda bkab...@redhat.com: - Original Message - Hi all, there just was a request to test groups for pkgdb2 [1] and I thought it might be a good opportunity to maybe start sharing at least some core python packages among a few people. For instance,

Re: update of ipython in rawhide

2014-05-29 18:04 GMT+02:00 Kalev Lember kalevlem...@gmail.com: On 05/23/2014 11:01 PM, Thomas Spura wrote: Dear maintainers of dependent packages of ipython, I will update python-ipython in rawhide next week on Friday to version 2.1.0. This will be shortly before the mass rebuilt on 6/6 [2

update of ipython in rawhide

Dear maintainers of dependent packages of ipython, I will update python-ipython in rawhide next week on Friday to version 2.1.0. This will be shortly before the mass rebuilt on 6/6 [2]. A scratch built can be found at [1]. Please check if a dependent package is still working fine. A lot has

update of python-tornado in rawhide

Dear maintainers of dependent packages of python-tornado, I will update python-tornado in rawhide next week on Thuesday to version 3.2.1. This will be shortly before the mass rebuilt on 6/6 [3]. The backward incompatible changes of version 3 series can be found at:

Re: orphaning packages

On Sun, Dec 1, 2013 at 5:06 PM, Miro Hrončok mhron...@redhat.com wrote: Dne 30.11.2013 22:26, Ionuț Arțăriși napsal(a): python-tornado -- Scalable, non-blocking web server and tools I need that one so I can take it. Hmm, sorry for being faster ;) I didn't see this mail, but only the

Re: orphaning packages

On Sun, Dec 1, 2013 at 6:30 PM, Miro Hrončok mhron...@redhat.com wrote: What do you need it for? Is your dependency still working with 3.1.1? pronteserve from printrun httpretty octoprint None of those is in Fedora right now. Feel free to take the package, I'll investigate if 3.1.1 is ok

Orphaning gpointing-device-settings

Hi, the package gpointing-device-settings is searching for a new maintainer in all branches. I just orphaned it as I don't use it any more and it doesn't preserve the settings from one reboot to another and don't know how to fix this properly [1]. A partial solution might be at [2] Furthermore

Re: Mate-Desktop

On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 9:59 PM, Jason L Tibbitts III ti...@math.uh.edu wrote: Ri == Rave it chat-to...@raveit.de writes: Ri For your information. I stoped working for the Mate-Desktop project Ri for f18 because for me it is imposssible to to work together with Ri Dan Mashal. One of the

Orphaning of blazeblogger

Hi, I just orphaned blazeblogger [1] in rawhide as I just switched to hyde [2]. If there are perl enthusiasts, who like to take it, feel free to do so and just let me know, if you also want other (non-rawhide) branches. Greetings, Tom [1] http://blaze.blackened.cz/ [2]

Re: changelog in spec file, was Re: Stop the git abuse

On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 11:02 AM, Stanislav Ochotnicky sochotni...@redhat.com wrote:  * If a git commit is tagged in a specific way, omit from rpm changelog.   What I mean by tagged is a git tag, in form of let's say   silentXXX. Where XXX has to be unique, but that can be figured out by  

Re: Review swaps?

On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 8:58 PM, Richard Shaw hobbes1...@gmail.com wrote: I've got two reviews I need completed which are dependencies for another package I'd like to submit. Pivy https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458975 Please open a new review request so $reporter == ${submitter

Re: Xfce 4.10pre1 in rawhide

On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 12:50 PM, Gilboa Davara gilb...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 10:31 AM, Frank Murphy frankl...@gmail.com wrote: Hence my reply. *Sigh* Then better look here: http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/xfce/2012-April/001082.html :) Greetings, Tom -- devel

Re: Broken dependencies: parcellite

On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 6:02 PM, Christoph Wickert christoph.wick...@googlemail.com wrote: Am Mittwoch, den 21.03.2012, 12:52 + schrieb build...@fedoraproject.org: parcellite has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree: On i386:       parcellite-1.0.2-0.1.rc5.fc17.i686 requires

Re: Bug #787712 threaded python deadlocks

On Sat, Feb 25, 2012 at 4:37 AM, Warren Togami Jr. wtog...@gmail.com wrote: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=787712 Hi, thanks for looking into this.  I am however more concerned that this patch goes into both F17 and F16-updates.  Who can do it?  Can I? Any provenpackager, yes. I

Re: How to determine FAS from BZ email?

2012/2/23 Miroslav Suchý msu...@redhat.com: But I find incredibly hard to find relation between bugzilla email and FAS account. How do you do this check? Show all useres in the cla_signed group [3] and search for the mail address. When it's not there it may be overritten in [4]. When it's not

Re: How to determine FAS from BZ email?

On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 3:24 PM, Jamie Nguyen ja...@tomoyolinux.co.uk wrote: Thomas Spura wrote: 2012/2/23 Miroslav Suchý msu...@redhat.com: But I find incredibly hard to find relation between bugzilla email and FAS account. How do you do this check? Show all useres in the cla_signed group

Re: [python] pep 394 is accepted

On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 2:45 PM, Neal Becker ndbeck...@gmail.com wrote: acceptance of pep 394 should be of interest to python users Why? We already do that on fedora so nothing will change. (Right now we have a symlink from python2 - python and not the other way around like in the pep, but the

Re: [python] pep 394 is accepted

On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 4:12 PM, Neal Becker ndbeck...@gmail.com wrote: Thomas Spura wrote: On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 2:45 PM, Neal Becker ndbeck...@gmail.com wrote: acceptance of pep 394 should be of interest to python users Why? We already do that on fedora so nothing will change. (Right

Re: Should we be using Bohdi yet for branched?

On Sun, Feb 12, 2012 at 4:02 PM, Bruno Wolff III br...@wolff.to wrote: It doesn't look like Bohdi isn't set up for branched yet. http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel-announce/2012-February/000889.html On Feb 14 will be the use bodhi and do updates switch. Greetings, Tom -- devel

Re: BTRFS as default in F17?

On Mon, Jan 23, 2012 at 11:56 PM, Greg aptge...@gmail.com wrote: will BTRFS be default in F17? going by a story posted on Phoronix there's likely to be a fsck next month? http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=news_itempx=MTA0Njk Looks like these bugs needs to be resolved first:

Re: Self Introduction

On Sun, Jan 1, 2012 at 3:51 PM, Ofer Schreiber oschr...@redhat.com wrote: As I'm not used to this kind of self-intro posts, I'll try to make this one quick :) I'm Ofer Schreiber, and I've been working with several Linux distributions for the past few years or so. Currently, I'm working for

Re: Please help do simulation build of two packages (xneur and gxneur)

On Sun, Dec 18, 2011 at 6:29 PM, Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) fo...@hubbitus.com.ru wrote: Now I have problem building two packages and pushes into stable branches - to build gxneur I need waiting until xneur go through testing and will be pushed to stable. Sometimes, when karma can't be

Re: Summary/Minutes from today's FESCO meeting (2011-12-12 at 1800 UTC)

On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 9:53 PM, J. Bruce Fields bfie...@redhat.com wrote: On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 02:12:30PM -0500, Stephen Gallagher wrote: On Tue, 2011-12-13 at 14:06 -0500, J. Bruce Fields wrote: On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 01:22:06PM -0800, Toshio Kuratomi wrote: To some extent I agree

Re: ARPACK - Change of upstream

On Sun, Dec 11, 2011 at 11:43 PM, TASAKA Mamoru mtas...@fedoraproject.org wrote: Jussi Lehtola wrote, at 12/12/2011 03:46 AM +9:00: Hi, Recently, a collaboration has picked up the pieces and started maintaining a new fork of ARPACK [2]. AFAIK forking or renaming will always require new

Re: Non-responsive maintainer ?

2011/12/5 Pierre-Yves Chibon pin...@pingoured.fr: - koji ➙ last build... This doesn't seem to work correctly. My last build was 2 days ago: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/userinfo?userID=988 And the script says it was Nov 2... Otherwise a great start :) Thanks, Tom -- devel mailing

Re: Non-responsive maintainer ?

2011/12/6 Kevin Fenzi ke...@scrye.com: On Tue, 6 Dec 2011 10:26:00 + Daniel P. Berrange berra...@redhat.com wrote: It might be interesting to run this script across every single user in the Fedora accounts system, and proactively identify any users whom have not done anything in Fedora

Re: boost soname bump

2011/11/20 Jussi Lehtola jussileht...@fedoraproject.org Is the bump for real this time? I remember that some time ago the soname was bumped but then returned, so I had to do two unneeded builds. -- Unless there are too much problems with this yes:

Re: Review swaps

On Wed, 26 Oct 2011 09:18:55 -0600 Jerry James wrote: The first two should be dead easy. From Fedora's point of view, they're just data packages; no libraries or binaries are involved. The third one is a bit complex. I had to tweak a lot of pathnames to match existing Fedora practice, as

Re: Heads up - firefox desktop file change

On Mon, 24 Oct 2011 16:58:05 +0200 Martin Stransky wrote: Firefox desktop file name has been changed in rawhide, from mozilla-firefox.desktop to firefox.desktop. See bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=736558. Ok. Could you also please comment to packaging the firefox/mozilla

Re: yubikey

On Tue, 11 Oct 2011 23:02:36 -0700 Toshio Kuratomi wrote: On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 11:11:39PM -0400, Paul Wouters wrote: On Tue, 11 Oct 2011, Nathanael D. Noblet wrote: As far as I know if you burn the key you will lose the ability to use the yubikey's servers and I'm guessing

Re: Firefox on Fedora: No longer funny

On Wed, 12 Oct 2011 20:58:15 +0200 Henrik Nordström wrote: mån 2011-10-10 klockan 20:44 +0200 skrev Thomas Spura: Forcing only critpath packages being in updates-testing and the rest being allowed to push to stable directly would help to fix issues much faster. You could set stable

Re: Firefox on Fedora: No longer funny

On Mon, 10 Oct 2011 17:18:10 -0400 Bill Nottingham wrote: Rahul Sundaram (methe...@gmail.com) said: On 10/10/2011 08:52 PM, Thomas Spura wrote: So there doesn't need to be more co-maintainers (which is welcomed anyway), but it would help to get such updates pushed to stable

Re: Firefox on Fedora: No longer funny

On Tue, 11 Oct 2011 10:36:01 -0400 Bill Nottingham wrote: Thomas Spura (toms...@fedoraproject.org) said: If the required updates are due to version checks in the extensions, it might be possible to have RPM have a dependency generator that checks these and outputs the appropriate

Re: Upstream Release Monitor

On Tue, 11 Oct 2011 09:45:17 -0500 Nathan O. wrote: If I remember correctly I did update it in rawhide. The master repo says it is updated to the latest version, by looking at the SPEC http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/gitweb/?p=worker.git;a=blob_plain;f=worker.spec;hb=master Apparently, you

Re: Firefox on Fedora: No longer funny

On Tue, 11 Oct 2011 12:01:00 -0400 David Michael wrote: Hi, On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 10:45 AM, Thomas Spura toms...@fedoraproject.org wrote: The automatic requires proposed in bug #745038, does this:        Requires: firefox = 3.0        Requires: firefox = 10.0a1 and seems

Re: Firefox on Fedora: No longer funny

On Tue, 11 Oct 2011 10:57:35 -0700 Adam Williamson wrote: On Mon, 2011-10-10 at 11:40 -0600, Tim Flink wrote: On Sun, 9 Oct 2011 13:16:52 +0200 Thomas Spura toms...@fedoraproject.org wrote: It would be great, when bodhi would allow me to add an updated mozilla-noscript

Re: Firefox on Fedora: No longer funny

On Sun, 09 Oct 2011 14:07:17 -0600 Peter Gueckel wrote: Vinzenz Vietzke wrote: Yeah sometimes is okay of course. Happening every two or three weeks it isn't. So, why are you using devel? This happened on F-15. -Tom -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Firefox on Fedora: No longer funny

On Mon, 10 Oct 2011 03:41:43 +0530 Rahul Sundaram wrote: On 10/10/2011 03:33 AM, Till Maas wrote: On Sun, Oct 09, 2011 at 11:10:12PM +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote: On 10/09/2011 10:59 PM, Vinzenz Vietzke wrote: I'd prefer a bit less bleeding edge over breaking crucial packages.

Re: Firefox on Fedora: No longer funny

On Mon, 10 Oct 2011 11:30:19 -0600 Tim Flink wrote: On Sat, 08 Oct 2011 23:43:58 +0200 Christoph Wickert christoph.wick...@googlemail.com wrote: 3. Can someone (I'm looking at you, QA) make sure all extensions are still compatible? Anyone with a FAS account can pull updates from

Re: Firefox on Fedora: No longer funny

On Mon, 10 Oct 2011 17:18:10 -0400 Bill Nottingham wrote: Rahul Sundaram (methe...@gmail.com) said: On 10/10/2011 08:52 PM, Thomas Spura wrote: So there doesn't need to be more co-maintainers (which is welcomed anyway), but it would help to get such updates pushed to stable

Re: Firefox on Fedora: No longer funny

On Sun, 9 Oct 2011 11:05:28 +0200 Till Maas wrote: On Sat, Oct 08, 2011 at 11:43:58PM +0200, Christoph Wickert wrote: 3. Can someone (I'm looking at you, QA) make sure all extensions are still compatible? The problem is that testers seem to ignore test cases provided for updates,

Re: rawhide report: 20110903 changes

On Sat, 3 Sep 2011 12:37:37 + Rawhide Report wrote: Broken deps for x86_64 -- FlightGear-2.0.0-6.fc16.x86_64 requires libosgViewer.so.74()(64bit) FlightGear-2.0.0-6.fc16.x86_64 requires libosgUtil.so.74()(64bit)

Re: Notice of intent: patching glibc

On Wed, 31 Aug 2011 12:00:43 +0200 Andreas Schwab wrote: Zoltan Boszormenyi zbos...@freemail.hu writes: The I can 100%... is not the first sentence of the comment but it's all in there. I'm taking about the redhat bug. How do I get to know about all this if nobody tells me? Yep...

Re: Notice of intent: patching glibc

On Wed, 31 Aug 2011 12:11:54 +0200 Thomas Spura wrote: On Wed, 31 Aug 2011 12:00:43 +0200 Andreas Schwab wrote: Zoltan Boszormenyi zbos...@freemail.hu writes: The I can 100%... is not the first sentence of the comment but it's all in there. I'm taking about the redhat bug

Re: Compiler as Require

On Fri, 26 Aug 2011 16:34:22 -0300 Sergio Belkin wrote: Hi Is it OK include a compiler (eg gcc-c++) for a -devel subpackage? I'd say, it depends on the use case... Why do you want to do that? * Only to have some piece of software installed, which can handle the (C++?) source code? Then no:

Re: pdfedit

On Sun, 21 Aug 2011 18:04:48 +0200 Joachim Backes wrote: Hi, in F15 I could install pdfedit by yum. Anybody knows when this will be possible in F16? Hi Joachim, It won't be possible in the near future, because it's orphaned: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/pdfedit Unless

Re: Attention: rawhide packages needing rebuilds due to the trailing slash bug of rpm-4.9.1

On Wed, 17 Aug 2011 12:10:03 +0300 Panu Matilainen wrote: Hi all, Due to the brown paperbag bug of rpm-4.9.1 causing unwanted trailing slashes on directories (with various nasty side-effects), the following packages in rawhide require rebuilding, the sooner the better to stop spreading

Re: Heads-up: ipython-0.11 breaking anything :)

On Tue, 2 Aug 2011 14:22:35 -0600 Jerry James wrote: On Tue, Aug 2, 2011 at 1:29 PM, Jerry James loganje...@gmail.com wrote: Also, I can test now, and it looks like python-polybori is broken by the new ipython. When I try to run ipbori, I get an ipython help message, followed by this:

Re: Heads-up: ipython-0.11 breaking anything :)

On Tue, 2 Aug 2011 14:22:35 -0600 Jerry James wrote: On Tue, Aug 2, 2011 at 1:29 PM, Jerry James loganje...@gmail.com wrote: Unfortunately, I can't test it.  I waited for today's Rawhide update so I could get the new version of ipython.  About 2 seconds after the yum transaction finished,

Re: Intel HD 3000 video blank screen during install of F15

On Wed, 03 Aug 2011 08:58:27 -0400 Ric Wheeler wrote: I have a shiny new laptop (HP Pavilion dm4) with the Sandy Bridge video (HD 3000). Installing F15 or the nightly F16 build causes a blank screen during the install. Installing/running basic video works but is annoying. I have spent a

Heads-up: ipython-0.11 breaking anything :)

Hi list, I just build ipython-0.11 in rawhide, which changed pretty much anything internally, so *ALL* dependant packages will be possible broken. repoquery just reports 2 packages, but it should be more...: python-networkx python-polybori Missing packages (maybe more): python-matplotlib scipy

Re: Defining build options based on available compiler version

On Sat, 30 Jul 2011 19:44:41 +0300 Jussi Lehtola wrote: Hi, I tried using %global gccver %(gcc -dumpversion) %if %{gccver} = 4.6.0 foo here %endif to conditionalize usage of quadruple precision support in a spec file that ships on multiple distros, but the comparison gives the

Re: Defining build options based on available compiler version

On Sat, 30 Jul 2011 21:39:24 +0100 Niels de Vos wrote: Watch out, this is very dangerous! You are comparing strings, not versions: print '4.6.2' = '4.6.12' True Thanks... I was testing with to low numbers... :( The better way would be to use distutils.version: from distutils.version

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] Retiring packages in F-16

On Wed, 13 Jul 2011 09:55:30 +1000 Peter Hutterer wrote: On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 11:05:14PM +0200, Thomas Spura wrote: On Tue, 12 Jul 2011 15:28:59 -0400 Bill Nottingham wrote: Orphan gpointing-device-settings This is co-maintained by whot (not shown in this list). I

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] Retiring packages in F-16

On Tue, 12 Jul 2011 15:28:59 -0400 Bill Nottingham wrote: Orphan gpointing-device-settings This is co-maintained by whot (not shown in this list). I definitely want to keep this. Peter: Do you continue as primary maintainer and I'll co-maintain it, or do you want to stay co-maintainer?

Re: Orphaning gbirthday and linbox

On Sat, 14 May 2011 21:14:20 -0600 Jerry James wrote: On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 6:46 AM, Thomas Spura toms...@fedoraproject.org wrote:        * linbox:          Required for SAGE [1], but FTBFS since a while and the new          version now requires another package, not yet in fedora

Orphaning gbirthday and linbox

Hi list, I'm orphaning gbirthday and linbox, because I either don't use them anymore or it's too much work to integrate it into fedora... * gbirthday: I don't use it anymore, and it has some SQL bugs open (I don't use SQL either, so I can't debug it etc.) *

Re: AutoQA: distro congestion?

On Tue, 19 Apr 2011 08:37:25 -0700 Adam Williamson wrote: On Tue, 2011-04-19 at 11:05 +0200, Michael Schwendt wrote: Some packagers have been observed circumventing the system by configuring a karma threshold of 1, so their own +1 vote or the first one from an arbitrary tester make it

Re: AutoQA: distro congestion?

On Tue, 19 Apr 2011 10:40:22 -0700 Adam Williamson wrote: On Tue, 2011-04-19 at 18:30 +0200, Thomas Spura wrote: On Tue, 19 Apr 2011 08:37:25 -0700 Adam Williamson wrote: On Tue, 2011-04-19 at 11:05 +0200, Michael Schwendt wrote: Some packagers have been observed circumventing

Re: Is Rawhide dead ?

On Mon, 4 Apr 2011 07:55:42 +0200 Pablo Martin-Gomez wrote: Hi, Since the 28th of March, Rawhide get no more updates as the rawhide report show up (or better said, don't show up) by its disappearance. The last update I got was a broken NetworkManager and Empathy/Gnome-Shell ('cos of

Re: Broken deps in F15 tree

On Tue, 1 Mar 2011 12:42:08 +0200 Jussi Lehtola wrote: Hi, I wonder why I'm still getting nag mails about pokerth has broken dependencies in the F-15 tree: On x86_64: pokerth-0.8.3-1.fc15.x86_64 requires libboost_iostreams-mt.so.1.44.0()(64bit) pokerth-0.8.3-1.fc15.x86_64 requires

Re: boost 1.46.0

On Sat, 05 Feb 2011 11:05:57 +0100 Petr Machata wrote: 04.02.2011 14:33, Petr Machata wrote: I'm in the process of test-driving a couple packages locally to make sure that the new boost works. If that turns out well, I'll do a non-scratch build of boost-1.46.0-0.beta1 later today. [snip]

Re: Vacation/devaway system

On Wed, 08 Dec 2010 16:07:51 +0100 Stanislav Ochotnicky wrote: Hi, there have been quite a few unresponsive maintainers processes in past few months + there are people that don't respond to emails in timely fashion. I'd like to have a system where anyone can see which maintainers are

Re: [Help]/proc/acpi/fan empty and CPUFan never Stop

On Wed, 24 Nov 2010 19:23:31 -0300 João Neto wrote: 2010/11/24 João Neto joao.gsn...@gmail.com I Running Fedora 14 x64 on HP G42 250Br ( Intel 5 Series/3400Series Chipset Family ) on Core i3 330M; After boot, the CPU temp is 58º C, after 1 or 2 minutes, without any operation, the CPU

Re: Plan for tomorrow's FESCo meeting (2010-11-17)

On Mon, 22 Nov 2010 14:32:04 -0800 Jesse Keating wrote: On 11/22/10 12:47 PM, Till Maas wrote: On Mon, Nov 22, 2010 at 12:31:05PM -0800, Mike Fedyk wrote: So they stay in updates-testing until someone does actually test them. We all know that the longer that updates wait in

Re: F-14 Branched report: 20101026 changes

On Tue, 26 Oct 2010 21:15:03 +0200 Dan Horák wrote: Jesse Keating píše v Út 26. 10. 2010 v 12:01 -0700: On 10/26/10 11:46 AM, Branched Report wrote: Updated Packages: tryton-1.6.1-1.fc14 --- * Tue Jul 27 2010 Dan Horák dan[at]danny.cz 1.6.1-1 - update to

Re: Anaconda suggestion...

. -- Thomas Spura -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: Who is working on python3 packages?

the original maintainer accept that change to the package. If upstream released an extra python3 package, I sometimes package that and get it in fedora. I don't think we need a python3 SIG for that. Isn't the python SIG enought? ;-) http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/SIGs/Python -- Thomas Spura

  1   2   >