Re: List of long term FTBFS packages to be retired in August

Hi, On 6/28/23 09:43, Miro Hrončok wrote: If you see a package that was built, please let me know. If you see a package that should be exempted from the process, please let me know and we can work together to get a FESCo approval for that. If you see a package that can be rebuilt, please do

Re: [HEADS UP] Fedora 39 Python 3.12 rebuilds to start in a side tag this week

On 6/16/23 09:47, Miro Hrončok wrote: On 16. 06. 23 9:41, Bastien Nocera wrote: Scolding people that haven't seen your original message for limitations in the build system isn't nice. Apologies for not being nice enough. However, we need to notify the folks who do that and ask them to stop,

Re: libdc1394 soname bump

Hi all, On 6/5/23 23:13, Till Hofmann wrote: Hi all, I have updated libdc1394 to 2.2.7, which bumps the soname to libdc1394.so.26. I created the side tag f39-build-side-68587 and built the updated libdc1394 in the side tag. If my query was correct, the following packages need to be rebuilt

libdc1394 soname bump

Hi all, I have updated libdc1394 to 2.2.7, which bumps the soname to libdc1394.so.26. I created the side tag f39-build-side-68587 and built the updated libdc1394 in the side tag. If my query was correct, the following packages need to be rebuilt: ffmpeg libdc1394 mrpt opencv player vxl You

How to build two flavors of the same package?

Hi all, Someone (rightfully) suggested that we should build glfw twice, once with wayland support and once without: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2152319 Is there any best practice how to build the same package in two different flavors, in this case cmake-based? I vaguely

Review swaps for 3 nagios plugins

Hi all, I'm looking for reviews or review swaps for 3 nagios plugins: python-nagios-plugins-check_systemd https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2082886 nagios-plugins-check_ssl_cert https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2131602 nagios-plugins-check_newest_file_age

Orphaning rofi

Hi all, I've just orphaned rofi [1], as I don't use it anymore and use wofi instead. The package is in a good shape, Dan (CCed) has already taken care of it in the past. Dan, please take the package if you want! If not, everyone else feel free to take it! Kind regards, Till [1]

librealsense soname bump 2.39

Hi all, I'm updating librealsense to 2.39.0, which bumps the soname to 2.39. I'll take care of rebuilding its only dependency (fawkes). Kind regards, Till ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to

log4cxx soname bump

Hi all, I'll upgrade log4cxx to 0.11.0, which bumps the soname. The only dependency is fawkes, which I will rebuild. Kind regards, Till ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to

Re: fawkes

On 10/11/20 1:51 PM, Till Hofmann wrote: On 10/11/20 1:56 AM, Rich Mattes wrote: On 10/10/20 5:27 PM, Till Hofmann wrote: On 10/10/20 6:24 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: On Sat, Oct 10, 2020 at 10:59:12AM +0200, Till Hofmann wrote: On 10/10/20 10:54 AM, Till Hofmann wrote: On 10/9/20 11

Re: fawkes

On 10/11/20 1:56 AM, Rich Mattes wrote: On 10/10/20 5:27 PM, Till Hofmann wrote: On 10/10/20 6:24 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: On Sat, Oct 10, 2020 at 10:59:12AM +0200, Till Hofmann wrote: On 10/10/20 10:54 AM, Till Hofmann wrote: On 10/9/20 11:46 PM, Till Hofmann wrote: On 10/9/20 9:19

Re: fawkes

On 10/10/20 6:24 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: On Sat, Oct 10, 2020 at 10:59:12AM +0200, Till Hofmann wrote: On 10/10/20 10:54 AM, Till Hofmann wrote: On 10/9/20 11:46 PM, Till Hofmann wrote: On 10/9/20 9:19 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: I think this might be that we need a newer ignition-msgs

Re: fawkes

On 10/10/20 10:54 AM, Till Hofmann wrote: > > > On 10/9/20 11:46 PM, Till Hofmann wrote: > >> >> On 10/9/20 9:19 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > >>> >>> I think this might be that we need a newer ignition-msgs package? >>> Or something in gaz

Re: fawkes

On 10/9/20 11:46 PM, Till Hofmann wrote: > > On 10/9/20 9:19 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: >> >> I think this might be that we need a newer ignition-msgs package? >> Or something in gazebo? > > I think it's the other way around: ignition-msgs needs protobuf 3.13 &

Re: fawkes

Hi Kevin, On 10/9/20 9:19 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > Hey folks. > > The fawkes package FTBFS and is not installable in F33/rawhide. > This breaks the robotics spin compose, and since it's the _last_ failing > thing in f33 composes, I'd love to fix it. :) > > We don't have a listed post of

Re: BZ + Firefox: browser freezes when choosing close reason?

On 9/5/20 3:17 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > On Sat, Sep 05, 2020 at 02:50:28PM +0200, Till Hofmann wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> I'm having a weird problem with Bugzilla: Whenever I want to close an >> issue and I click on the reason menu (the one that shows

BZ + Firefox: browser freezes when choosing close reason?

Hi all, I'm having a weird problem with Bugzilla: Whenever I want to close an issue and I click on the reason menu (the one that shows NOTABUG, NEXTRELEASE etc.), my browser freezes. Is anyone else seeing this issue? I've tried to search for similar bug reports, but searching for "bugzilla

What to do about FTBFS because auf cmake change?

Hi all, I have a number of packages that are FTBFS due to https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/CMake_to_do_out-of-source_builds. None of my packages has seen any commits for that change. I've read on the list that packages that are considered "a complete mess" are not touched. Are all my

librealsense soname bump to 2.38

Hi all, I'm updating librealsense to 2.38.0 in the next few days, which includes an soname bump. The only dependency is fawkes, which I also maintain (and which is currently FTBFS for other reasons). Kind regards, Till ___ devel mailing list --

Re: libdc1394: Unannounced soname bump?

On 7/27/20 2:28 PM, Richard Shaw wrote: > I just got a BZ on OpenImageIO due to inability to install the -devel > package, > > Upon inspection it looks like the soname was bumped but a rebuild of > OIIO was not performed. > > libdc1394-2.2.2-14.fc32 -> libdc1394-2.2.6-1.fc33 > >

Re: Fedora Packager Dashboard available for testing

On 6/23/20 6:28 PM, Josef Skladanka wrote: > Hi, > > We'd like to announce public testing of the Packager Dashboard - a new > service for Fedora package maintainers aiming to provide all relevant > data: FTBFS/FTI status (from both Bugzilla, Koschei and health check), > orphan warnings,

Re: Fedora 33 System-Wide Change proposal: Fedora-Retired-Packages

On 6/16/20 9:56 AM, Vít Ondruch wrote: > Also, I wonder what is wrong with "dnf autoremove", which is supposed to > remove unused leaf packages, which were not explicitly installed? On my system, it removed grub2-efi and made the system unbootable. So I'm not sure running this as part of the

Re: Fedora 33 System-Wide Change proposal: Fedora-Retired-Packages

On 6/16/20 1:16 AM, Miroslav Suchý wrote: > Dne 16. 06. 20 v 0:37 James Cassell napsal(a): >> Please not using mechanism. Make it easy to opt out, or better yet opt-in. > > On package level, there is likely no other way. DNF team will have no > time/resources to implement this on DNF level. >

soname bump: librealsense

Hi all, I'm updating librealsense to 2.35.2 in Rawhide. The only dependency is fawkes, which is currently FTBFS because gazebo fails to install. Kind regards, Till ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to

Re: [HEADS UP] F33 Boost 1.73.0 rebuilds starting in a side tag

On 6/3/20 4:50 PM, Jonathan Wakely wrote: > On 03/06/20 13:36 +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote: >> On 03. 06. 20 13:32, Till Hofmann wrote: >>> Yes, that's what I meant. I'm not going to test patches by submitting >>> builds over and over again, that's not really time ef

Re: [HEADS UP] F33 Boost 1.73.0 rebuilds starting in a side tag

On 6/3/20 1:01 PM, Frantisek Zatloukal wrote: > > > On Wed, Jun 3, 2020 at 12:46 PM Jonathan Wakely > mailto:jwak...@fedoraproject.org>> wrote: > > On 03/06/20 12:35 +0200, Till Hofmann wrote: > > > > > >On 6/2/20 5:24 PM, Jonatha

Re: [HEADS UP] F33 Boost 1.73.0 rebuilds starting in a side tag

On 6/2/20 5:24 PM, Jonathan Wakely wrote: > ### C++ includes > > Several packages failed to build because they couldn't find C++ > Standard Library algorithms: > freeopcua: error: 'for_each' is not a member of 'std' I don't see a changelog entry (or a commit), did you only update the

Re: i3 new SIG

Hi Eduard, On 5/15/20 12:21 AM, Eduard Lucena wrote: > > As others have already mentioned in the thread: we should look into > joining forces with the sway SIG (which I am also a member of). > > > It's not a bad idea, but TBH, I still want to stay away from Wayland. > > While a

Review swap: freeopcua

Hi all, I'm looking for a review for freeopuca, a C++ OPC-UA library: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1824467 The package should be rather easy to review. I'm willing to do a review in return. Kind regards, Till ___ devel mailing list --

Re: Updated review trackers pages

On 4/7/20 9:21 AM, Mattia Verga via devel wrote: > we have updated the script which provides the cached review trackers > pages at https://fedoraproject.org/PackageReviewStatus/ (thanks to > cverna for the assistance). It looks like 1821497 [1] is displayed incorrectly (currently at the

Re: Packages looking for new (co)maintainers

Hi Peter, On 3/8/20 12:04 PM, Peter Robinson wrote: > A list of packages that I still have an interest in but would > appreciate a co-maintainer: > dotconf > festival-freebsoft-utils > speech-dispatcher > flite > csound I can help out with flite, although I can't promise I'll put a lot of time

Re: Unannounced SONAME bump: librealsense

Hi Fabio, On 3/6/20 9:13 PM, Fabio Valentini wrote: > Hi everybody, > > librealsense (maintainers in CC) bumped the SONAME of its shipped > library with the latest update, and (at least some) dependent packages > have not been rebuilt (including fawkes, maintainers in CC). Thanks for the

Re: mock build failures for f32/33

Hi Richard, On 2/18/20 3:44 PM, Richard Shaw wrote: > I am unable to build packages using mock for either f32 or f33 which is > very problematic. Afaik you need mock from updates-testing for the new config/keys. Kind regards, Till ___ devel mailing

Re: Disabling Fedora 29 chroots in Copr

On 2/18/20 12:15 PM, Jakub Kadlcik wrote: > I would like to ask you, can anyone with non Red Hat email confirm, > that they get the notifications? The subject is > >> [Copr] upcoming deletion of outdated chroots in your projects > I received the notification. I have a posteo.de email. Kind

Re: Packaging of github cli?

On 2/14/20 7:36 PM, Joe Doss wrote: > On 2/14/20 10:23 AM, Joe Doss wrote: >> On 2/14/20 9:56 AM, Richard Shaw wrote: >>> Anyone working on packaging github's CLI? >>> >>> https://github.com/cli/cli  >>> >>> I've never packaged a GO application before... >> >> I have a spec I am working on right

Re: Proxies for Copr repositories

On 2/4/20 2:58 PM, Miroslav Suchý wrote: > Dne 04. 02. 20 v 13:18 Till Hofmann napsal(a): >> Does COPR itself also use the CDN for builds? I usually build dependency > > Yes. Since today. > >> chains, and since this morning, I see a lot of build failures due to

Re: Proxies for Copr repositories

On 2/4/20 10:03 AM, Miroslav Suchý wrote: > Hi, > I just enabled the content delivery network (CDN) for Copr repositories. > It is provided by CloudFront from AWS. And it is provided for free by Amazon > to Fedora. > [...] > > If you experience any problem with CDN, please let me know. >

Re: undefined symbol from OpenColorIO prevents Blender from running

On 11/20/19 1:32 PM, Till Hofmann wrote: On 11/20/19 4:49 AM, Richard Shaw wrote: On Tue, Nov 19, 2019 at 9:27 PM Luya Tshimbalanga mailto:l...@fedoraproject.org>> wrote:     Some users reported Blender which I maintain failed to start due to     this issue:     blender: symbol

Re: undefined symbol from OpenColorIO prevents Blender from running

++filt _ZN4YAML6detail9node_data12empty_scalarB5cxx11E YAML::detail::node_data::empty_scalar[abi:cxx11] So the problem is really with YAML. It looks like Till Hofmann built yaml-cpp 0.6.3 for Fedora 30 and 31 (I only built it for Rawhide) and did not rebuild OCIO. Yes I did. There was no soname bump and the abidiff warnings looke

Re: CGAL soname "bump" in rawhide

On 10/13/19 4:39 PM, Ankur Sinha wrote: Hello, I'm building a new package, graph-tools. The scratch build fails on rawhide with: ``` annobin-cc1 -m64 -mtune=generic -fasynchronous-unwind-tables -fstack-clash-protection -fcf-protection -Wno-register -fopenmp -O3 -fvisibility=default

Re: Problem with F30 module packages that are built in F32 buildroot (?)

On 9/23/19 1:42 PM, Petr Pisar wrote: On 2019-09-22, Till Hofmann wrote: We have an odd issue with a module build of sway for F30: It looks like the module was actually built with a F32 buildroot. BZ: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1754167 Here's the build: https

Re: Automation ignores FTBFS guidelines

On 9/22/19 4:08 PM, Miro Hrončok wrote: On 22. 09. 19 16:01, Till Hofmann wrote: So the guidelines allow package retirement without any announcement on devel. That's certainly unexpected, at least to me. I also don't think this is a good idea, because maintainers of packages that depend

Re: Automation ignores FTBFS guidelines

On 9/22/19 3:40 PM, Miro Hrončok wrote: On 22. 09. 19 14:37, Till Hofmann wrote: Hi all, So I've just been notified that tolua++ has been retired, which is a dependency of one of my packages (fawkes). BZ: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1736911 I've closed this bug because

Re: Automation ignores FTBFS guidelines

On 9/22/19 3:01 PM, Hans de Goede wrote: But I do have something to say about the specific example used. tolua++ being retired is not a problem for fawkes, as fawkes depends on compat-tolua++, which is maintained by me and has NOT been retired. Thanks for pointing this out! I assumed

Automation ignores FTBFS guidelines

Hi all, So I've just been notified that tolua++ has been retired, which is a dependency of one of my packages (fawkes). BZ: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1736911 This would have been fine (as no action has been taken), if the automation had actually followed the FTBFS

Problem with F30 module packages that are built in F32 buildroot (?)

Hi all, We have an odd issue with a module build of sway for F30: It looks like the module was actually built with a F32 buildroot. BZ: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1754167 Here's the build: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=1376355 The modulemd file

Re: Upcoming change for adopting orphaned packages and anitya integration

On 9/13/19 12:32 PM, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: > ## Anitya integration > > Currently if you want to tweak the setting for the anitya integration, you > need > to open a pull-request on the fedora-scm-requests project at > https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/ > That git repo is pretty

mongo-cxx-driver 3.4.0 is available (was: RH Account of package maintainer disabled)

On 7/10/19 8:01 AM, Petr Kubat wrote: > Hi Till, > > On 7/10/19 7:39 AM, Till Hofmann wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> I'm trying to contact the maintainer (Marek Skalický) of >> mongo-cxx-driver, which has a pending update: >> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug

Cannot build with mock for rawhide on Fedora 30

Hi all, I'm facing an issue with the package signatures on Fedora when trying to build in rawhide chroot: $ mock -r fedora-rawhide-x86_64 --shell [...] Public key for zstd-1.4.2-1.fc31.x86_64.rpm is not installed. Failing package is: zstd-1.4.2-1.fc31.x86_64 GPG Keys are configured as:

Re: friday roundup of failing images in rawhide

On 7/20/19 3:16 AM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > 6. Fedora Robotics lab: > https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=36353237 > > fawkes broken deps: > > Problem 1: conflicting requests > - nothing provides fawkes-plugin-clips-webview needed by > fawkes-1.2.0-6.fc31.x86_64 > - nothing

Re: Vim and spec template

On 7/19/19 11:33 AM, Elliott Sales de Andrade wrote: > On Fri, 19 Jul 2019 at 05:09, Zdenek Dohnal wrote: >> >> >> On 7/18/19 9:47 PM, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote: "ZD" == Zdenek Dohnal writes: >>> ZD> Hi all, I would like to ask as Vim co-maintainer, do you find useful >>> ZD> for Vim

Re: Vim and spec template

On 7/18/19 6:44 PM, Steven A. Falco wrote: > On 7/18/19 10:28 AM, Zdenek Dohnal wrote: >> >> On 7/18/19 4:10 PM, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote: >>> Hello, Zdenek Dohnal. >>> >>> Thu, 18 Jul 2019 15:51:33 +0200 you wrote: >>> Even the new .spec files, which do not have to be RPM spec files?

Re: Vim and spec template

On 7/18/19 1:44 PM, Zdenek Dohnal wrote: > Hi all, > > I would like to ask as Vim co-maintainer, do you find useful for Vim to do: > > - when you open new file with .spec suffix, Vim will get you basic spec > file structure? > > Recently I found out someone can find it as bad behavior >

RH Account of package maintainer disabled

Hi all, I'm trying to contact the maintainer (Marek Skalický) of mongo-cxx-driver, which has a pending update: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1723810 However, if I try to select "Need additional information", I get an error: You can't ask Marek Skalický because that account is

Nonresponsive maintainer: bioinfornatics

Hi all, I'm trying to reach bioinfornatics. According to fedora_active_user, their last login was on 2019-03-27. Open tickets: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1700141 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1674976 Does anyone know how to reach bioinfornatics? Kind regards,

Should I always create a dedicated stream branch for my module?

Hi all, I'm currently working on a module for sway. We basically just want to have a stream that always contains the latest version of sway (including all its dependencies), the same version that is also in rawhide (this stream should be named 'rolling' if I understand the guidelines correctly).

Re: sway SIG

On 3/18/19 4:22 PM, Till Hofmann wrote: > There's been ongoing discussions on BZ [1] with some people showing > interest in a SIG. The main purpose of this email is to see who else > would be interested in contributing to sway. If we can find enough > people, I'd continue

sway SIG

Hi all, there's been a rising number of people interested in sway, the i3-compatible Wayland compositor. At the same time, with the recent sway 1.0 release, the packaging work is also increasing, as more and more components are split into separate projects. For this reason, we thought about

Re: Self-Introduction: Michael Zhang

On 1/20/19 2:27 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > Also, please attach your spec file and srpm to the bug. Don't use url > obfuscators and don't use external hosting (people want to see where > the links go without following them, and we want those files to be > available infinitely, and

Re: ONGOING PROBLEM: Buildsystem degradation

On 1/4/19 6:38 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > On 12/24/18 4:24 AM, Till Hofmann wrote: > >> OK, I was actually wondering exactly that, I remembered that COPR is >> maintained/run by someone else. But on the Fedora Infrastructure Status >> page [1], there is also a C

Re: ONGOING PROBLEM: Buildsystem degradation

On 12/23/18 7:20 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > On 12/23/18 3:37 AM, Till Hofmann wrote: >> >> >> On 12/21/18 4:03 PM, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: >>> There is currently a problem with the networking of various systems in >>> our Phoenix data-center

Re: ONGOING PROBLEM: Buildsystem degradation

On 12/21/18 4:03 PM, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > There is currently a problem with the networking of various systems in > our Phoenix data-center which houses most of our build systems. The > problem has knocked off most of our x86_64 build systems and several > of our aarch64/arm systems.

Re: [HEADS UP] Latest protobuf is coming into Rawhide

On 11/23/18 12:55 PM, Igor Gnatenko wrote: > I've built it and dependent packages in side tag and it's going to be > merged back soon. > > Only 4 problematic packages: > * gazebo (not related to protobuf, FTBFS for long time) >

Re: Issues with Google Chrome, PyCharm, Steam and other third-party repos in Fedora 29 prereleases

On 10/25/18 4:02 PM, Stephen Gallagher wrote: > It was discovered[1] a short while ago that, due to a packaging > mistake in the fedora-workstation-repos package, upgrades from Fedora > 28->Fedora 29 would replace the /etc/yum.repos.d/*.repo files provided > from that package with their default

Re: bottlenecks that case my machine to freeze

On 10/25/18 4:47 PM, mcatanz...@gnome.org wrote: > On Thu, Oct 25, 2018 at 6:50 AM, Nicolas Mailhot > wrote: >> I get the same thing without any special load. System would work fine >> for hours and then input would start bugging. >> >> It translates into floods of keystrokes, or eaten

Re: @fedoraproject.org email in Bugzilla

On 10/24/18 1:54 PM, Christopher wrote: > On Wed, Oct 24, 2018, 06:19 Till Hofmann <mailto:thofm...@fedoraproject.org>> wrote: > > Hi all, > > I've been using my @fedoraproject.org <http://fedoraproject.org> > email alias in Bugzilla for a &

@fedoraproject.org email in Bugzilla

Hi all, I've been using my @fedoraproject.org email alias in Bugzilla for a while. I regularly get those complaining emails that I should fix my account, specifically it says: > If you recently changed the email address associated with your > Fedora account in the Fedora Account System, it is

Re: Yet another gargantuan mathematical software update

On 10/12/18 9:14 PM, Jerry James wrote: > On Sun, Oct 7, 2018 at 7:33 AM Till Hofmann > wrote: >> FYI: gazebo is currently FTBFS because player is FTBFS. I looked into >> player and fixed two smaller issues [1], but it's still FTBFS [2]. It >> looks like it's still re

Re: Yet another gargantuan mathematical software update

On 10/7/18 2:17 AM, Jerry James wrote: > Hi folks, > > It's about time for another "update the world" moment for some of the > mathematical software we have in Fedora. I'm going to try to clear > away a big chunk of my backlogged package work with this update, so it > will be even bigger than

Re: SONAME bump for armadillo

b On 08/18/2018 01:58 AM, José Abílio Matos wrote: > On Friday, 17 August 2018 16.53.37 WEST José Abílio Matos wrote: >> reveals that the only packages that require armadillo are: >> * gdal >> * mlpack >> * mmseq > > OK, after following the prescribed procedure for rawhide I had only a

Re: Packages with scriptlets which call ldconfig

On 06/28/2018 03:30 AM, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote: > In Fedora 28 and newer, it is no longer necessary for most packages > which install shared libraries to have scriptlets which call ldconfig: > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Scriptlets#Shared_Libraries > > For your convenience, I

Re: Nonresponsive maintainer: guidograzioli

On 06/04/2018 10:14 AM, Till Hofmann wrote: > Hi all, > > I'm trying to get in contact with Guido Graizoli (FAS guidograzioli). He > has not responded to a bug report requesting an update of bibtex2html > [1]. The package is currently also FTBFS [2], where he did not respond &

Nonresponsive maintainer: guidograzioli

Hi all, I'm trying to get in contact with Guido Graizoli (FAS guidograzioli). He has not responded to a bug report requesting an update of bibtex2html [1]. The package is currently also FTBFS [2], where he did not respond either. I also tried contacting him privately by e-mail, but I did not get

Re: Fedora 28 Change Checkpoint: 100% Code Complete Deadline & Beta Freeze

On 03/08/2018 03:54 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote: > I wrote: >> Fedora: >>> Beta and Final freezes are in effect from 00:00 UTC of the freeze day. >> >> KDE: >>> All deadlines are due 23:59 UTC, but if you need a few more hours, notify >>> someone from the release team. > > PS: The deadlines I

Re: News in opencv package

On 03/02/2018 08:31 PM, Sérgio Basto wrote: > On Fri, 2018-03-02 at 10:55 -0800, Adam Williamson wrote: >> On Fri, 2018-03-02 at 18:39 +, Sérgio Basto wrote: >>> >>> player will fail due a glibc problem >> >> Can you elaborate? You've tried a build and it blew up? >> >> I am starting to get

Re: News in opencv package

On 03/02/2018 12:24 PM, Josef Ridky wrote: > Hi folks, > > I would like to inform you, that new version of opencv package (3.4.1) will > be available in rawhide and Fedora 28. > All packages, that requires opencv should be rebuild. > It would be nice if the announcement would have been made

Re: Exclude paths for elfdeps dependency generator

On 02/20/2018 05:33 PM, Till Hofmann wrote: > Hi all, > > I have a question regarding the the RPM dependency generator scripts. > I'm working on packaging the ROS stack [1,2] and I'm currently dealing > with the dependency generation. My goal is to wrap all Provides and > Re

Re: Lazarus vs. FPC updates

On 02/26/2018 12:53 PM, Artur Iwicki wrote: > Is there a way I can automatically do something like "BuildRequires: fpc > (whatever version); Requires: fpc = version-used-during-build", or would I > have to control this manually? You can define an RPM macro for the version in fpc, e.g., by

Exclude paths for elfdeps dependency generator

Hi all, I have a question regarding the the RPM dependency generator scripts. I'm working on packaging the ROS stack [1,2] and I'm currently dealing with the dependency generation. My goal is to wrap all Provides and Requires for sonames because ROS does not use proper sonames (and therefore they

Re: package conflict with source package but not with binary package

On 12/30/2017 09:44 PM, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote: > Hi, Till. > > On Saturday, 30 December 2017 at 17:27, Till Hofmann wrote: > [...] >> So, I'm wondering: >> 1. Can I add "Provides: bear = %{version}-%{release}", as bear does not >> provide

non-responsive maintainer: radford

Hi all, I'm trying to contact Jim Radford (radford) per non-responsive maintainer policy [1]. I contacted Jim several times on bz#1505463 [2] and also sent a private e-mail to his email account shown in FAS. If you know how to get in touch with Jim, please let me know. Kind regards, Till [1]

Re: provenpackager request: Re: [HEADS UP] opencv 3.3.1 is going to rawhide

On 01/09/2018 05:53 PM, Sérgio Basto wrote: > Packages remaining to rebuild: > digikam > fawkes > kf5-libkface > nomacs > player > simon > > Provenpackager request for: > Do fedpkg build in fawkes master [3] > [3] > https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/fawkes/commits/master > That won't help

package conflict with source package but not with binary package

Hi all, I'm preparing Bear [1] as a Fedora package. Unfortunately, the package name bear is already taken by the bear engine [2], so I'm considering the best way to resolve this. Ubuntu [3], Debian [4], Arch (AUR) [5], and Mint [6] all package the compilation database (i.e., the package I'm

Re: Firefox "shield"

On 12/17/2017 01:11 AM, Benjamin Kreuter wrote: > Sorry if this was discussed already, but it looks like Firefox 57 on > Fedora 26 (and I assume 27 but have not checked) in the Fedora repo has > "extension.shield-recipe-client.enabled = true". > > 1) Is there a reason this is not turned off by

Re: Wiki search?

On 12/10/2017 02:21 PM, Radka Janekova wrote: > Hi, > > is it just me or there is no way to search the new wiki? Could we pretty > please have easily accessible search bar, or have a search button under > the obvious "Navigation" drop down? Anything would do the trick really... > Should be

Re: Do I need Epoch: for downgrades in rawhide?

On 10/15/2017 08:08 PM, Randy Barlow wrote: > On 10/15/2017 12:34 PM, Neal Gompa wrote: >> I would suggest that you submit librealsense1 as a separate package, >> instead. The applications that use the older versions should probably >> be linked to the older one, but things should progressively

Do I need Epoch: for downgrades in rawhide?

Hi all, if I want to downgrade a package in rawhide only (I only pushed the update to rawhide), do I need to add an Epoch? background: I updated librealsense to librealsense2 and afterwards realized that the new library is a major rewrite that does not support older camera models. After

Re: Why is Fx 57 in Updates Testing?

On 10/12/2017 11:32 AM, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: On Thu, Oct 12, 2017 at 11:22:52AM +0200, Till Hofmann wrote: Actually, as a regular desktop user, I'd be surprised if I got the FF57 with a regular update without upgrading to the latest Fedora release. I don't think FF57 should be in F26

Re: Why is Fx 57 in Updates Testing?

On 10/11/2017 10:58 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: I don't get the whole kerfuffle about FF57 being beta: F27 is in beta now too, and it's the time to test what will be in the relased version, and using a pre-release of a package seems to be a better way to do this than using some old

Re: Why is Fx 57 in Updates Testing?

On 10/11/2017 04:00 PM, Martin Stransky wrote: On 10/11/2017 03:52 PM, Tomasz Torcz wrote: On Wed, Oct 11, 2017 at 03:32:07PM +0200, Martin Stransky wrote: On 10/11/2017 03:17 PM, Gerald B. Cox wrote: Was this on purpose?  Fx 57 is BETA, and  I was under the impression that BETA software

Re: Self Introduction: David Hendricks

On 10/02/2017 12:10 PM, Igor Gnatenko wrote: On Mon, 2017-10-02 at 05:39 -0400, Charalampos Stratakis wrote: Hello and welcome! Please, avoid using top posting.. See: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines#Proper_post ing_style From the same section: "Please, remove the

Re: Packages giveaway

On 09/20/2017 09:57 AM, Fabio Alessandro Locati wrote: Clearly this is not working very well, so I'm giving up all my Point of Contacts position on packages. I will try to work on them, even if I'm not th PoC anymore, but I don't want to keep those packages stuck due to my (un)availability.

Re: How to chainbuild in a build override?

On 09/23/2017 02:05 AM, Kevin Kofler wrote: Petr Pisar wrote: In rawhide, if you want a longer time isolation, you ask relengs for a sige tag, you do all builds there without affecting others and then you ask relengs to merge the builds back to rawhide. Of course this has same races and one

Re: How to use COPR + Tito + dist-git?

On 28.03.2017 14:23, Miroslav Suchý wrote: > Dne 28.3.2017 v 10:40 Till Hofmann napsal(a): >> I'm playing around with Tito and COPR following [1,2]. It works great so >> far, but I'm still having problems with loading the sources to a >> lookaside cache. I've found a blog pos

How to use COPR + Tito + dist-git?

Hi all, I'm playing around with Tito and COPR following [1,2]. It works great so far, but I'm still having problems with loading the sources to a lookaside cache. I've found a blog post that uses git-annex [3], but the COPR builders do not have git-annex installed. According to another blog post

Taking orphaned package ctemplate

Hi all, I'm taking the ctemplate package. The package was unretired about a year ago but it was never built after unretirement. After I filed a ticket about the missing builds [1], the package was orphaned without further comments. The package is still functional and (somewhat) maintained

Re: Retiring yap (Prolog interpreter)

On 23.02.2017 17:18, Petr Pisar wrote: > I'm deeply sorry I will have to retire yap package because: > > It crashes on i686 after updating GCC to 7 > . > Last stable version is 7 years old (we have it in Fedora). > Last development version is 4

Re: unheeded ACL requests

On 02/12/2017 04:05 AM, Globe Trotter wrote: > Hello, > > For a long time (almost 2 years), dilo (and a number of packages) have > not been updated. So, I decided to request commit privileges. But the > request has sat unheeded for the last several months. Unfortunately, > this is not true only

Re: rpmlint: wrong-script-interpreter

On 02/06/2017 04:39 AM, Pranav Kant wrote: > Hi Michael, > > On Mon, Feb 6, 2017 at 3:31 AM, Michael Catanzaro > wrote: > > Dude it looks like you have a tracking pixel in your mail: > >

Re: Request for review swap

On 18.01.2017 13:09, Mamoru TASAKA wrote: > Hello, all: > > I have one review request for a package for LXDE: > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1409243 lxhotkey > > Review swap is appreciated. I'll take it. Can you please review librealsense:

  1   2   >