Re: Orphaning my packages

epository settings: > https://github.com/timlau/dnf-daemon/settings (there will be a > "transfer repository" button at the bottom of the page). > > Thanks. > > On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 6:28 AM, Tim Lauridsen <t...@rasmil.dk> wrote: > > Hi Guys > > > >

Orphaning my packages

it. If someone is interested in taking over the project or part of it, then please contact me and I give access to the repositories on github. Thanks to all there yumex users over the years and I'm sorry that I can't continue the project. Thanks for all the good times under the Fedora umbrella. Tim

Fwd: frafra uploaded yumex-dnf-4.1.6.tar.gz for yumex-dnf

How do i handle a situation where someone, without my knowledge uploads new sources to one of my projects. It could be a security problem ? Tim -- Forwarded message - From: Date: Sun, 27 Dec 2015 at 23:00 Subject: frafra uploaded

Re: frafra uploaded yumex-dnf-4.1.6.tar.gz for yumex-dnf

On Mon, 28 Dec 2015 at 11:41 Pierre-Yves Chibon <pin...@pingoured.fr> wrote: > On Mon, Dec 28, 2015 at 09:38:25AM +0000, Tim Lauridsen wrote: > >Looks like a false alarm, just a scatch build > >https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1294377 > > Why up

Re: frafra uploaded yumex-dnf-4.1.6.tar.gz for yumex-dnf

Looks like a false alarm, just a scatch build https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1294377 Tim On Mon, 28 Dec 2015 at 10:38 Tim Lauridsen <tim.laurid...@gmail.com> wrote: > How do i handle a situation where someone, without my knowledge uploads > new sources to one of

Re: lxqt

This is not a yumex-dnf issue, it works fine in other DE's, Other lxqt users have had this issue, I don't know what the solution is Tim On Wed, 23 Dec 2015 at 10:13 mastaiza wrote: > This is not a problem, it is a problem with lxqt, there dont have a > working polkit gui

Re: Fedora 22 and missing applications

On Wed, 27 May 2015 at 17:19 Matthew Miller mat...@fedoraproject.org wrote: On Wed, May 27, 2015 at 05:07:52PM +0200, Michael Schwendt wrote: Having keywords makes the search functionality much better, but isn't actually required for your application to be shown in the software center.

Re: dnf replacing yum and dnf-yum

On Mon, 13 Apr 2015 at 10:22 Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net Now, I admit that the second half is limping a bit. The information is available but it's not as easily accessible as you want it to be. If you want to help us, I invite you to write a plugin that will show the information

review swap : yumex-dnf

Hi. I have submitted yumex-dnf for inclusion into fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1210430 yumex-dnf is a rewritten version of yumex, based on dnf instead of yum you can check it out here https://copr.fedoraproject.org/coprs/timlau/yumex-dnf If you want to review it, then

Re: dnf replacing yum and dnf-yum

On Wed, 8 Apr 2015 at 11:05 drago01 drag...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, Apr 7, 2015 at 6:37 PM, Adam Williamson adamw...@fedoraproject.org wrote: On Tue, 2015-04-07 at 18:33 +0200, drago01 wrote: On Tue, Apr 7, 2015 at 6:00 PM, Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net wrote: Am

Re: dnf debug-info-install

On Tue, 7 Apr 2015 at 14:10 Michael Catanzaro mcatanz...@gnome.org wrote: Hi, I want 'dnf debug-info-install' to be available by default on Workstation. Right now it lives in the dnf-plugins-extras package, which depends on snapper, which we can't install by default. Can this plugin please

Re: dnf replacing yum and dnf-yum

On Tue, 7 Apr 2015 at 17:54 Bruno Wolff III br...@wolff.to wrote: On Tue, Apr 07, 2015 at 09:07:08 -0600, Kevin Fenzi ke...@scrye.com wrote: dnf's default behavior is like yum with --skip-broken already. Not when installing packages. If thats not working and you need to find out

Re: F21 downloads repository metadata in 3 places!

On Tue Dec 16 2014 at 9:09:59 PM Chris Murphy li...@colorremedies.com wrote: Fresh installation of Fedora 21 Workstation, accepting defaults, I then reboot and notice the following contents of /var/cache, filtering out things not relevant for this discussion (which also happen to not change

Re: Suspend/resume broken on Lenovo laptops (Fedora 21 beta)

On Tue Nov 11 2014 at 6:25:35 PM valent.turko...@gmail.com valent.turko...@gmail.com wrote: Guys and galls, if you have Lenovo laptop please install latest Fedora 21 beta and provide feedback because there are reported cases that suspend/resume doesn't work on Lenovo laptops. Currently

Re: dnf vs yum

On Fri Oct 24 2014 at 12:46:41 PM Rahul Sundaram methe...@gmail.com wrote: Hi On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 3:51 AM, Michael Simacek wrote: Mock-1.2 no longer depends on yum API and has been ported to use DNF. So if you use the new version and set config_opts['package_manager']='dnf' and also

Re: dnf vs yum

On Fri Oct 24 2014 at 1:23:27 PM Rahul Sundaram methe...@gmail.com wrote: Hi On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 6:51 AM, Tim Lauridsen wrote: Mock still defaults to yum, but supports dnf also using config_opts['package_manager']='dnf' So it makes sense to have a hard requirement on yum Well

Re: dnf vs yum

On Fri Oct 24 2014 at 4:01:20 PM Stanislav Ochotnicky sochotni...@redhat.com wrote: On Fri 24 Oct 2014 02:26:37 PM CEST Rahul Sundaram wrote: Hi On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 7:58 AM, Vít Ondruch wrote: Yes, switch the defaults ASAP. Thanks FWIW, there is still considerable work

Re: dnf vs yum

Drop as in use yum for that, but dnf for the new versions? That sounds reasonable. Well reality is f-r is mostly for checking *current* Fedora guidelines that in some cases apply only to rawhide. If someone is running f-r on a system from 4 years ago to verify current packaging

Re: fedora 21 lets me install packages without root

On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 8:03 PM, Richard Hughes hughsi...@gmail.com wrote: On 20 October 2014 18:00, Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net wrote: uninstall anything in context of packagekit and just use yum Please stop giving advice like this. If you try to remove PackageKit you'll end up

Re: Review swap

I am still in need of a reviewer. Who can help me out? I'm willing to review for you in exchange. -- I will take it later today, if nobody beat me to it :) Tim -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of

Re: Can you help with making fonts awesome in Fedora 21?

On Thu, Oct 16, 2014 at 11:44 AM, Richard Hughes hughsi...@gmail.com wrote: If you maintain a font in Fedora, or are a provenpackager, I could really need your help this weekend. Basically, we want to implement AppStream metadata[1] for all the fonts we want to show in the software center.

Re: dnf on debuglevel

On Sun, Oct 5, 2014 at 9:03 AM, Balint Szigeti balint.s...@gmail.com wrote: p.s. Can someone tell me how dnf tells the new (uninstalled packages) changelog? I tried to do it with yum but the only way that I found is yum changelog plugin which tell the changelog after I downloaded the

Review Swap : dnfdaemon - Dbus daemon for dnf package actions

If someone would review this one and let me know what to review Review Request: dnfdaemon - Dbus daemon for dnf package actions https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1149390 Tim -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: Proposal: Increasing application icon sizes to 64px

On Thu, Oct 2, 2014 at 11:17 AM, Richard Hughes hughsi...@gmail.com wrote: Designing an application for the lowest common denominator does not give you a high-quality cohesive application that's easy to use and nice on the eye. It gives you a miss-mash of ugly noise that's hard to use. I

Re: Proposal: Increasing application icon sizes to 64px

On Fri, Sep 26, 2014 at 12:19 PM, Richard Hughes hughsi...@gmail.com wrote: At the moment applications have to provide an icon = 32x32px in size to be included in the AppStream metadata and shown in the software center. This is *tiny* on a HiDPI screen, so should I mandate that all

postr orphaned

I have orphaned postr a flicker uploader, I have not used it for years Upstream has been stalled for years, but there has been some recent activity latest upstream release is 0.13.1 not yet in fedora, because of python-bsddb3 is not in fedora, only python3-bsddb3 is. Tim -- devel mailing list

Re: comps categories: are they any use to anyone any more?

On Mon, Jun 23, 2014 at 6:42 PM, Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com wrote: Yeah, you're probably right. In that case we should probably explain the difference somewhere - are you aware of anywhere it's currently written down? There are no comments in the comps.xml files, no documentation in

Re: comps categories: are they any use to anyone any more?

On Sun, Jun 22, 2014 at 3:10 AM, Bill Nottingham nott...@splat.cc wrote: Check the post-install tools; I believe at least one of apper or yumex still uses them. Yes, Yumex is still using categories to organize groups, both in the current stable release and in nextgen release based on the

Re: repodata - xz

On Sat, Jun 21, 2014 at 8:28 PM, Jon jdisn...@gmail.com wrote: Would it be too much trouble to use the sqlite data in DNF? I suppose it would be a step backwards to have our primary (future) tool using gzip metadata. the information in the sqlite files is orded i a way the yum is using the

Re: dnf even allows to uninstall RPM and systemd without warnings

On Sat, Jun 21, 2014 at 6:29 PM, Rahul Sundaram methe...@gmail.com wrote: Tim, Is there anyone working on a protected packages plugin for Dnf? In the past, it has helped users avoid trashing their systems due to bugs in package-cleanup and so on. So it is not just the command line users

Re: comps categories: are they any use to anyone any more?

On Sun, Jun 22, 2014 at 6:33 PM, Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com wrote: on the other hand, there's a clear overlap with 'environment groups'. it seems like we kinda have one type of group too many. :P environments is something you can install, categories is not, they fit different a

Re: dnf even allows to uninstall RPM and systemd without warnings

On Sun, Jun 22, 2014 at 5:18 PM, Stephen John Smoogen smo...@gmail.com wrote: Where should the RFE be filed? Bugzilla againt dnf or dnf-plugins-core Tim -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct:

Re: DNF: why does it refresh metadata all the time

On Fri, Jun 20, 2014 at 4:01 PM, Zdenek Kabelac zkabe...@redhat.com wrote: Also for years Debian supplies short update 'diffs' - so user doesn't have to download multiple MB sized files - just couple short small files - again something much nicer then running a daemon to download tens of MB on

Re: repodata - xz

On Fri, Jun 20, 2014 at 3:44 PM, Dennis Gilmore den...@ausil.us wrote: because thats how createrepo works. the gzipped files are not ones you download. yum and dnf use the sqlite files. yum is using the sqlite files, dnf uses the .xml.gz files -- devel mailing list

Re: DNF: why does it refresh metadata all the time

On Thu, Jun 19, 2014 at 8:47 PM, Dennis Gilmore den...@ausil.us wrote: In testing dnf on rawhide I nearly always do dnf clean metadata dnf update purely because I found most of the time dnfs metadata was out of date. To me dnf fetching the metadata behind the scenes just doesn't work right.

Re: dnf replacement for yum-cron

Bugzilla is the right place for a an RFE, not fdl :) Tim On Mon, Jun 16, 2014 at 2:50 PM, Neal Becker ndbeck...@gmail.com wrote: Been using yum-cron for years with good results. If yum is being phased out, I'll want a dnf-cron replacement -- devel mailing list

Re: dnf replacement for yum-cron

On Mon, Jun 16, 2014 at 2:50 PM, Neal Becker ndbeck...@gmail.com wrote: Been using yum-cron for years with good results. If yum is being phased out, I'll want a dnf-cron replacement dnf's cache is updated by by a systemd service, not dynamic when executed like yum. so if yum-cron is only

Re: F22 System Wide Change: Replace Yum With DNF

On Mon, Jun 16, 2014 at 11:04 PM, Zing z...@fastmail.fm wrote: Does yum have current developers/maintainers? If so, actually obsoleting yum seems kind of rude to me. If that's the case why not just leave yum as is? Those that want to use yum use yum and dnf use dnf. I don't know the

Re: F22 System Wide Change: Replace Yum With DNF

Come on, every thing in Fedora changes all the time, It is hard for me to see the fuzz about having to type 'dnf install foobar', instead of 'yum install foobar' If you uses a tool like yum at the command line, you should be able to handle that. more novice users will use gui tool and don't

Re: Replace Yum With DNF

It alredy has, it is called dnf-plugins-core all tools in dnf is implemented as plugins there is extending the dnf command line Tim On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 11:11 PM, David dgbo...@gmail.com wrote: Excuse me. To whom, or to where, should I write to request that dnf has a tools package like

Re: Replace Yum With DNF

On Fri, Jun 13, 2014 at 2:30 PM, Lukas Zapletal l...@redhat.com wrote: Is there a migration for users and developers document? A page with yum commands on the left and corresponding commands with dnf on the right. Including developer things like scripts from yum-utils (yum-builddep etc).

Re: Copr and Playground plugin part of dnf-plugins-core?

If you want people to vote for something, It would be a good idea to say why and what the pro/cons is for having copr as a separate package. Tim On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 11:29 AM, Miroslav Suchý msu...@redhat.com wrote: In https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1090516 Jiri asked for

Re: Copr and Playground plugin part of dnf-plugins-core?

I have started a new dnf-utils project for commuty plugins/addons there is not maintain by the core dnf team https://github.com/timlau/dnf-utils copr / playground is welcome here is the core dnf developers, think its dont fit into dnf-plugins.core It is not submitted as a fedora package yet,

Re: What will happen to XFCE, LXDE, Mate, Cinnemon in Fedora.Next

On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 12:40 PM, Bastien Nocera bnoc...@redhat.com wrote: - Original Message - Workstation might implement easy installation of alternative desktops in the GNOME Software app at some point. Urgh. This is just moving the problem from the installer/media selection

What will happen to XFCE, LXDE, Mate, Cinnemon in Fedora.Next

What will happen to XFCE, LXDE, Mate, Cinnemon in Fedora.Next ? The Workstation WG, looks like a Gnome only thing, will there be at place of users of other DE's in Fedora.next ? Best Regards Tim -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Proposal: Don't show applications in the software center with XPM icons

On Fri, Mar 7, 2014 at 6:50 AM, Satyajit Sahoo satyajit.ha...@gmail.comwrote: Apps with ugly icons and ugly design results in bad user experience IMO. They should not be displayed in the software center The quaility of an application has nothing todo, with at fancy icon, not showning the icon

Re: Proposal: Don't show applications in the software center with XPM icons

Not showing app, because they have bad looking icons, seems like a bad idea to me. what about using some cairo magic to merge the .xpm icon with some other .png frame to make it look better

Re: packages from bitbucket

Seems like bitbucket uses unversioned tar ball, not the best approch https://bitbucket.org/yarosla/httpress/get/tip.tar.gz I would make my own tarball from the git checkout and document in the spec how to make it https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:SourceURL#Using_Revision_Control Tim

Re: packages from bitbucket

On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 11:21 AM, Christopher Meng cicku...@gmail.comwrote: Bitbucket has downloads support. Also you can get the tarball from the tags. What's the problem? The problem with this project is that there is no release tags, so you cant get a specific version, just download

Re: AppData questions

On Wed, Nov 6, 2013 at 8:43 PM, Richard Hughes hughsi...@gmail.com wrote: On 6 November 2013 10:41, Michael Schwendt mschwe...@gmail.com wrote: # rpm -qf /usr/share/app-info/xmls/fedora-20.xml.gz gnome-software-3.10.3-1.fc20.x86_64 does. It's AppStream metadata. Whould it not be a

Re: Copr

On Thu, Nov 7, 2013 at 1:54 PM, Miroslav Suchý msu...@redhat.com wrote: Dear developers and Fedora contributors, let me introduce Copr: http://copr-fe.cloud.fedoraproject.org/ Copr is a build system for third party repositories. It is intended for: * upstream teams - to make nightly and

Re: Is Gnome Software ready for primetime ?

On Fri, Nov 1, 2013 at 8:57 PM, Ray Strode halfl...@gmail.com wrote: Small errors here: liControl want package repositories there is enabled for current session/li maybe should be: liControl what package repositories are enabled for the current session/li Thanks, fixed upstream

Re: Is Gnome Software ready for primetime ?

On Fri, Nov 1, 2013 at 12:01 PM, Richard Hughes hughsi...@gmail.com wrote: Packages are not interesting to desktop users, they are just an implementation detail of how to get something done. e.g. Play my media file, Open this document someone sent to me. Anyone wanting to do things like

Re: Is Gnome Software ready for primetime ?

On Fri, Nov 1, 2013 at 7:51 AM, Pete Travis li...@petetravis.com wrote: Hmm... It sounds like yumex would be much more discoverable if it included an appdata file :) Done, https://github.com/timlau/yumex/blob/82198add9daabcfcabe9d8bb7a28ef3190e920d7/misc/yumex-appdata.xml Tim -- devel

Re: Is Gnome Software ready for primetime ?

On Fri, Nov 1, 2013 at 3:26 PM, Matthias Clasen mcla...@redhat.com wrote: Great, thanks for doing that. Noticed while quickly looking over the file: - it is not valid xml: needs to be escaped as amp; - 'gui' is not a great term to use. I'd suggest rewording the first sentence maybe as

Re: Is Gnome Software ready for primetime ?

On Fri, Nov 1, 2013 at 8:30 PM, drago01 drag...@gmail.com wrote: On Fri, Nov 1, 2013 at 8:27 PM, Tim Lauridsen tim.laurid...@gmail.com wrote: On Fri, Nov 1, 2013 at 3:26 PM, Matthias Clasen mcla...@redhat.com wrote: Great, thanks for doing that. Noticed while quickly looking over

Re: Is Gnome Software ready for primetime ?

On Fri, Nov 1, 2013 at 8:38 PM, Richard Hughes hughsi...@gmail.com wrote: You've got some odd non-utf8 char as the very first byte in the file: Looks like the editor has written an Unicode BOM, after removing that it validates ok Tim -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Is Gnome Software ready for primetime ?

I have tested gnome-software to see the current state, compaired to gpk in F19, there is a lot stuff there cant be done. 1. You cant install backgrounds / icons 2. Not all application found in the menu, can be found under installed, you can search for them and find them, but cant remove them (ex.

Re: Is Gnome Software ready for primetime ?

On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 12:50 PM, Matthias Clasen mcla...@redhat.comwrote: On Thu, 2013-10-31 at 12:13 +0100, Tim Lauridsen wrote: I have tested gnome-software to see the current state, compaired to gpk in F19, there is a lot stuff there cant be done. 1. You cant install backgrounds

Re: Is Gnome Software ready for primetime ?

On Fri, Nov 1, 2013 at 4:58 AM, Ankur Sinha sanjay.an...@gmail.com wrote: It isn't a *package* management application. It's an *application* management application, ie., it only handles packages that are desktop applications (and therefore have desktop files associated with them). I'm

Re: Could someone help me with writing polkit rule?

Yes, I think so The policy is to config pkexec to run something as root The rule is to make the group get permission without having to enter a root/admin password Tim On Fri, Oct 25, 2013 at 2:08 PM, Peter Lemenkov lemen...@gmail.com wrote: 2013/10/25 tim.laurid...@gmail.com