Re: Bundled copies of the Porter stemmer library

2013-04-17 Thread Tom Lane
from upstream in unbundling, because the Porter code isn't widely available as a prepackaged library. (AFAIK anyway --- has that situation changed in the last few years?) regards, tom lane -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org

Re: PIE breaks detection of available stack depth with getrlimit?

2013-04-17 Thread Tom Lane
Dhiru Kholia dhiru.kho...@gmail.com writes: On 04/16/13 at 05:59pm, Tom Lane wrote: Pursuant to the recent discussion about using _hardened_build in more packages, I tried turning it on in postgresql. I was unpleasantly surprised to find that that causes the package's regression tests

PIE breaks detection of available stack depth with getrlimit?

2013-04-16 Thread Tom Lane
file it against? regards, tom lane -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: PIE breaks detection of available stack depth with getrlimit?

2013-04-16 Thread Tom Lane
. regards, tom lane -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: MySQL and MariaDB in Fedora

2013-04-14 Thread Tom Lane
are pretty off-topic. regards, tom lane -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

bison, flex have broken deps in rawhide

2013-04-04 Thread Tom Lane
: You could try running: rpm -Va --nofiles --nodigest DEBUG util.py:354: Child return code was: 1 Somebody please fix? regards, tom lane -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: bison, flex have broken deps in rawhide

2013-04-04 Thread Tom Lane
;-) regards, tom lane -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Karma needed for urgent postgresql security updates

2013-04-04 Thread Tom Lane
PostgreSQL has ever had. I'd appreciate it if people could test these and up-karma them so they can go stable ASAP. (Meanwhile, I'm looking for something nice in a brown paper bag ... it was my bug :-() regards, tom lane -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: bison, flex have broken deps in rawhide

2013-04-04 Thread Tom Lane
glitch and that another build try will work. Yes, I resubmitted the rawhide build and it seems to be running fine this time. Weird. regards, tom lane -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: bison, flex have broken deps in rawhide

2013-04-04 Thread Tom Lane
Kevin Fenzi ke...@scrye.com writes: Tom Lane t...@redhat.com wrote: Somebody please fix? Well, fortunately this is only affecting rawhide, and I would hope nobody is storing critical data on rawhide ;-) Sure, but I'd like to note that rawhide users are people too. ;) We should try

Re: Expanding the list of Hardened Packages

2013-04-03 Thread Tom Lane
definitive about the worst-case address space wastage due to ASLR in 32-bit builds; anyone here know? regards, tom lane -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: Unhelpful update descriptions

2013-03-11 Thread Tom Lane
. regards, tom lane -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: MySQL-libs conflicts with mariadb-libs-5.5.29-7.fc19.x86_64

2013-03-11 Thread Tom Lane
. regards, tom lane -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: Unhelpful update descriptions

2013-03-11 Thread Tom Lane
. regards, tom lane -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: Should MariaDB touch my.cnf in %post?

2013-02-15 Thread Tom Lane
and packagers. But we may need to revisit the idea that we can just have mariadb obsolete mysql and be done. regards, tom lane -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: Should MariaDB touch my.cnf in %post?

2013-02-14 Thread Tom Lane
. regards, tom lane -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: Proposed F19 Feature: Replace MySQL with MariaDB

2013-02-11 Thread Tom Lane
have to work out how they would coexist or conflict with the core packages. regards, tom lane -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

config.guess/config.sub for aarch64 (was Re: Mass Rebuild for Fedora 19)

2013-02-08 Thread Tom Lane
changes in upstream autoconf yet, and if so what version? If not, why not? regards, tom lane -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: MySQL 5.6 for Fedora 19

2013-02-06 Thread Tom Lane
. regards, tom lane -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: Proposed F19 Feature: Replace MySQL with MariaDB

2013-01-28 Thread Tom Lane
the biggest issue involved with Oracle's handling of mysql vis-a-vis downstream packagers. But if there were to be an attempt to deal with the docs licensing problem in particular, that would be a good solution from my standpoint. regards, tom lane -- devel mailing list devel

Re: Proposed F19 Feature: Replace MySQL with MariaDB

2013-01-23 Thread Tom Lane
short-term benefit. mariadb really wants to plop down exactly where mysql was sitting: take over the executable names, the library sonames, the data directory, etc. Anything else will greatly complicate packaging and open the door to added bugs. regards, tom lane -- devel

Re: drop inheritance at f19 branch point?

2013-01-23 Thread Tom Lane
more work to do ... but it's work you'd have had to face up to soon anyway.) regards, tom lane -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: Proposed F19 Feature: Replace MySQL with MariaDB

2013-01-22 Thread Tom Lane
expecting would be that the mysql database package group would actually give you mariadb, as would the anaconda checkbox. regards, tom lane -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: Proposed F19 Feature: Replace MySQL with MariaDB

2013-01-22 Thread Tom Lane
dropped? We could leave 'em as is, couldn't we? regards, tom lane -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: Proposed F19 Feature: Replace MySQL with MariaDB

2013-01-22 Thread Tom Lane
Bill Nottingham nott...@redhat.com writes: Tom Lane (t...@redhat.com) said: (If the compatibility testing goes *really* smoothly, maybe we could just drop the requirement for original mysql to still be available, in which case it reduces to the standard package-replacement problem. But I'm

Re: MariaDB in Fedora

2013-01-16 Thread Tom Lane
. Personally I'd like to dump mysql in time for F19, but we need validation that switching to maria doesn't break anything for anyone. regards, tom lane -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: Fwd: [Libjpeg-turbo-users] jpeg-9, API/ABI compatibility, and the future role of this project

2013-01-16 Thread Tom Lane
. regards, tom lane once organizer, Independent JPEG Group -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: MariaDB: Packagers needed

2012-12-14 Thread Tom Lane
: mysql-devel, and no source changes are needed in other packages. regards, tom lane -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: libjpeg-turbo API/ABI bump in F19 (transition from jpeg6 to jpeg8 API/ABI)

2012-12-13 Thread Tom Lane
-turbo-devel provide libjpeg-devel and not libjpeg-turbo-compat-devel? Only if jpeg8 is a drop-in (source code compatible) replacement. Otherwise you're only moving the point at which failures will occur. regards, tom lane -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: yum upgrade from F17 to F18

2012-11-09 Thread Tom Lane
Juan Rodriguez nus...@fedoraproject.org writes: I did it on a live system, too. The only thing that failed during that time was postgres (Which managed to stay borked after it was done and f18 booted, the pg_upgrade method didn't work properly) BZ? regards, tom lane

Re: Fedora 18 Beta to slip by two weeks, Beta release date is now Nov 27

2012-11-08 Thread Tom Lane
dangerous. regards, tom lane -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: Rolling release model philosophy (was Re: Anaconda is totally trashing the F18 schedule (was Re: f18: how to install into a LVM partitions (or RAID)))

2012-11-04 Thread Tom Lane
you right back to the series-of-releases approach that we have now. regards, tom lane -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: Rolling release model philosophy (was Re: Anaconda is totally trashing the F18 schedule (was Re: f18: how to install into a LVM partitions (or RAID)))

2012-11-04 Thread Tom Lane
creating a nasty feedback loop that further helps to drive away people whose main interest is not in helping to debug the system. Eventually the short-lived releases would just be rawhide-with-a-different-name. regards, tom lane -- devel mailing list devel

Re: Anaconda is totally trashing the F18 schedule (was Re: f18: how to install into a LVM partitions (or RAID))

2012-11-02 Thread Tom Lane
per release cycle across the whole distro. Any significant extra burden is going to be insupportable. regards, tom lane -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: Anaconda is totally trashing the F18 schedule (was Re: f18: how to install into a LVM partitions (or RAID))

2012-11-02 Thread Tom Lane
development cycle so feature owners and others working in the community are dealing with active and actively maintained packages. How exactly are you going to force maintainers who go missing to do so at a prescheduled time? Real life is seldom that convenient. regards, tom

Re: Anaconda is totally trashing the F18 schedule (was Re: f18: how to install into a LVM partitions (or RAID))

2012-11-02 Thread Tom Lane
=?UTF-8?B?IkrDs2hhbm4gQi4gR3XDsG11bmRzc29uIg==?= johan...@gmail.com writes: On 11/02/2012 04:25 PM, Tom Lane wrote: How exactly are you going to force maintainers who go missing to do so at a prescheduled time? Real life is seldom that convenient. bash script + a cron job should suffice

Re: Rolling release model philosophy (was Re: Anaconda is totally trashing the F18 schedule (was Re: f18: how to install into a LVM partitions (or RAID)))

2012-11-02 Thread Tom Lane
or the day after. (Anyone up for porting fedpkg to Ubuntu?) I've seen a whole lot of user demand for *more* stable versions of Fedora. I've seen none whatever for less stable versions. regards, tom lane -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https

Re: Rolling release model philosophy (was Re: Anaconda is totally trashing the F18 schedule (was Re: f18: how to install into a LVM partitions (or RAID)))

2012-11-02 Thread Tom Lane
Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com writes: On Fri, 2012-11-02 at 17:53 -0400, Tom Lane wrote: I've seen a whole lot of user demand for *more* stable versions of Fedora. I've seen none whatever for less stable versions. Perhaps I ought to be more clear. I think we can maintain the level

Re: Anaconda is totally trashing the F18 schedule (was Re: f18: how to install into a LVM partitions (or RAID))

2012-10-31 Thread Tom Lane
as possible. There is not a third option. (Brooks' _Mythical_Man-Month_ has useful things to say about this sort of scheduling trap --- anybody who hasn't read it should.) regards, tom lane -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org

Anaconda is totally trashing the F18 schedule (was Re: f18: how to install into a LVM partitions (or RAID))

2012-10-30 Thread Tom Lane
package, we'd be telling the maintainer to hold off till F19. The rest of us don't get to be doing major feature development post-beta-freeze. regards, tom lane -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: MariaDB: Packagers needed

2012-10-29 Thread Tom Lane
is that mysql is now open source in name only. /opinion regards, tom lane -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: Systemd macros (f18+)

2012-09-13 Thread Tom Lane
macros is anything significant. Meanwhile, by refusing to do this you are inconveniencing a lot of package maintainers for whom the costs of having different specfiles in different branches *are* significant. regards, tom lane -- devel mailing list devel

Re: PostgreSQL 9.2 for F18?

2012-09-10 Thread Tom Lane
there is probably a good change it will make it in F18. Otherwise it probably won't. PG 9.2 is now released, and F18 isn't beta yet. So I'd like to push it into F18 --- will anyone help test? regards, tom lane -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https

Re: PostgreSQL 9.2 for F18?

2012-09-10 Thread Tom Lane
Bruno Wolff III br...@wolff.to writes: On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 10:24:40 -0400, Tom Lane t...@redhat.com wrote: PG 9.2 is now released, and F18 isn't beta yet. So I'd like to push it into F18 --- will anyone help test? Yeah! I'll definitely do some testing. My personal web server

Re: Mass changes to packaging

2012-08-28 Thread Tom Lane
, then we can remove the redundant macro definitions. In the meantime, people who are arguing against this seem to be entirely too confident that the current design is perfect. regards, tom lane -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org

Re: Moving pid files from /var/run/$name.pid to /var/run/$name/$name.pid

2012-08-24 Thread Tom Lane
to make it configurable. /var/run is not a universal standard. You don't have to look any further than /var/run versus /run to realize that some flexibility there is a good idea for any upstream that has any portability pretensions whatsoever. regards, tom lane -- devel

Re: Mass changes to packaging

2012-08-23 Thread Tom Lane
to be enabled by default. Having two separate macros is not a bad thing IMO, even if they happen to have the same expansion today. regards, tom lane -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: Mass changes to packaging

2012-08-22 Thread Tom Lane
not have to. regards, tom lane -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: Mass changes to packaging (was: Re: New: Introduce new systemd-rpm macros in [...])

2012-08-21 Thread Tom Lane
. If that doesn't happen, I'm going to resist using them in my spec files until they are in all active Fedora branches. regards, tom lane -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: Mass changes to packaging

2012-08-21 Thread Tom Lane
the service's enable state. regards, tom lane -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: Mass changes to packaging

2012-08-21 Thread Tom Lane
Bruno Wolff III br...@wolff.to writes: Tom Lane t...@redhat.com wrote: Bruno Wolff III br...@wolff.to writes: Yeah, it gets old pretty quick when every time some packages get updated, one needs to enable or disable them again. Huh? That doesn't happen given the current (F16/F17) scriptlets

Re: PostgreSQL 9.2 for F18?

2012-08-20 Thread Tom Lane
=?ISO-8859-2?Q?Micha=B3_Piotrowski?= mkkp...@gmail.com writes: Is there any chance that 9.2 will be available for F18? I'm holding off until there is a 9.2.0 release, or at least an RC release, but I do very much want it to be in F18. regards, tom lane -- devel mailing

Is package lookaside cache based on file name, or md5sum?

2012-08-13 Thread Tom Lane
it...) thanks, tom lane -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

postgresql Unix-domain sockets moving

2012-08-13 Thread Tom Lane
. regards, tom lane -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: Insane results from mock rawhide build

2012-08-03 Thread Tom Lane
Jesse Keating jkeat...@j2solutions.net writes: On 08/02/2012 06:27 PM, Tom Lane wrote: I just did /usr/bin/mock -r fedora-rawhide-x86_64 /tmp/freeimage-3.10.0-10.fc18.src.rpm Check and see what repo url is in that config file, and see what it resolves to when in use? I did another rm -rf

Insane results from mock rawhide build

2012-08-02 Thread Tom Lane
, so WTF? Where is mock pulling this from? (The other packages it grabbed seem to be an assortment of mostly fc17 and a few fc18 builds; didn't really check dates on the others, but for sure this is not a post-mass-rebuild package set.) regards, tom lane -- devel mailing

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED v4] Retiring packages for F-18

2012-08-02 Thread Tom Lane
Bruno Wolff III br...@wolff.to writes: On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 20:13:18 -0400, Tom Lane t...@redhat.com wrote: I'm still hoping to kill libpng-compat (and libtiff-compat) before we branch F18. Should libpng12 obsolete libpng-compat? Doh. I didn't think about that, but you're probably

redhat-lsb-desktop versus transition to current libpng

2012-08-01 Thread Tom Lane
. regards, tom lane -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: Provenpackager help needed to complete libpng/libtiff transition

2012-08-01 Thread Tom Lane
Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com writes: On Wed, 2012-08-01 at 01:53 -0400, Tom Lane wrote: There are still about half a dozen packages left that failed the recent mass rebuild because they contain source-code dependencies on obsolete versions of libpng and/or libtiff. I've filed patches

Re: redhat-lsb-desktop versus transition to current libpng

2012-08-01 Thread Tom Lane
the normal package review pushups, when this is absolutely nothing except a backwards-compatibility package --- it ought to be exactly like the F16 libpng package. And I'd like to get it done before the F18 branch. regards, tom lane -- devel mailing list devel

Re: redhat-lsb-desktop versus transition to current libpng

2012-08-01 Thread Tom Lane
Tom Callaway tcall...@redhat.com writes: On 08/01/2012 10:03 AM, Tom Lane wrote: What this means, IMO, is that we need to split out libpng12 as a separate package. The current hack that I'm using (bundling 1.2 and 1.5 into a single SRPM) was never meant to be more than a very short-term

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] [FINAL NOTICE] Retiring packages for F-18

2012-07-31 Thread Tom Lane
be nearly so ad-hoc. See recent threads. regards, tom lane -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Provenpackager help needed to complete libpng/libtiff transition

2012-07-31 Thread Tom Lane
Thanks! regards, tom lane -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: Suggestion: Continuous mass rebuild

2012-07-29 Thread Tom Lane
seems to have stopped, I agree that it would be a good thing for the Fedora project to start doing it officially. regards, tom lane -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED v4] Retiring packages for F-18

2012-07-26 Thread Tom Lane
was likely to sort correctly as well. regards, tom lane -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED v4] Retiring packages for F-18

2012-07-26 Thread Tom Lane
. regards, tom lane -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED v3] Retiring packages for F-18

2012-07-24 Thread Tom Lane
.) regards, tom lane -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Accidental soname bump in libdbi

2012-07-23 Thread Tom Lane
gripe for one of the dependent packages, please *do not* rebuild. apologies, tom lane -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: Accidental soname bump in libdbi

2012-07-23 Thread Tom Lane
Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com writes: On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 1:52 PM, Tom Lane t...@redhat.com wrote: So I'll fix that later today. If you got a broken-deps gripe for one of the dependent packages, please *do not* rebuild. Whoops, just did Io-language. Let me know when it's fixed

Re: Support for legacy init script actions for systemd services

2012-06-26 Thread Tom Lane
: /usr/libexec/initscripts/legacy-actions/frobozz/xyzzy What do we need to Require: for this? Is there still a requirement to hide it in a foo-sysvinit subpackage? regards, tom lane -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman

Re: Support for legacy init script actions for systemd services

2012-06-26 Thread Tom Lane
idea. regards, tom lane -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: Support for legacy init script actions for systemd services

2012-06-26 Thread Tom Lane
in the Fedora project I beg to differ. If Bill doesn't get his wrist slapped by FPC, I'll be implementing this for postgresql tomorrow, because I'm tired of hearing complaints about it. regards, tom lane -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https

Re: Support for legacy init script actions for systemd services

2012-06-26 Thread Tom Lane
Michael Cronenworth m...@cchtml.com writes: On 06/26/2012 06:54 PM, Tom Lane wrote: I beg to differ. If Bill doesn't get his wrist slapped by FPC, I'll be implementing this for postgresql tomorrow, because I'm tired of hearing complaints about it. I must be the only one that prefers your

Re: Support for legacy init script actions for systemd services

2012-06-26 Thread Tom Lane
parameters through to the legacy script, I don't see how. Anyway this seems a bit outside the charter of the legacy-script feature, which IIUC is to let you do exactly what you did before. If you now prefer postgresql-setup, by all means keep using that. regards, tom lane

Re: service restart question

2012-06-25 Thread Tom Lane
a horribly bad one. regards, tom lane -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: multilib conflict with doxygen generated pdf

2012-06-13 Thread Tom Lane
). regards, tom lane -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: Setting up Koji question - postgres

2012-06-02 Thread Tom Lane
' information_schema.sql, which is automatically installed when the database is initialized (hence the OP was getting a lot of errors from the objects already existing). regards, tom lane -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org

Re: Stop the git abuse

2012-05-20 Thread Tom Lane
%if 0%{?fedora} n conditionals.) [ shrug... ] The fact that *you* don't care is not evidence that nobody else cares, and it is certainly not evidence that nobody else should care. regards, tom lane -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https

Packaging issue: what to do about debuginfo after arch-noarch change?

2012-05-14 Thread Tom Lane
that addresses the point. Given that we're converting most Java packages to noarch, perhaps the issue comes up often enough to justify having a policy? regards, tom lane -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: Packaging issue: what to do about debuginfo after arch-noarch change?

2012-05-14 Thread Tom Lane
Tom Callaway tcall...@redhat.com writes: On 05/14/2012 10:34 AM, Tom Lane wrote: I recently converted mysql-connector-java from arch to noarch (it used to use GCJ to build, now it doesn't). Martin Cermak pointed out to me that if you had the debuginfo subpackage installed, and you upgrade

New libtiff version in rawhide, requires dependent packages rebuild

2012-05-06 Thread Tom Lane
either libtiff- or libpng-dependent code, contact me off-list and I'll be glad to try to help. regards, tom lane adrian fbida pre-existing FTBFS (libpng related) agoode nip2pre-existing FTBFS agoode openslide agoode vips

Re: SELinuxDenyPtrace: Write, compile, run, but don't debug applications?

2012-04-08 Thread Tom Lane
will gladly join the crowd of villagers with torches and pitchforks. regards, tom lane -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: SELinuxDenyPtrace: Write, compile, run, but don't debug applications?

2012-04-08 Thread Tom Lane
and probably a very large fraction of other Fedora users. How is that more secure? regards, tom lane -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: Does systemd expose any unit-file-parsing functionality?

2012-03-21 Thread Tom Lane
Lennart Poettering mzerq...@0pointer.de writes: On Sat, 17.03.12 11:41, Tom Lane (t...@redhat.com) wrote: Tomasz Torcz to...@pipebreaker.pl writes: You can try systemctl show -p Environment unit [ experiments with that ... ] Hm, the output format seems pretty ill-designed, but I guess I

Re: Does systemd expose any unit-file-parsing functionality?

2012-03-21 Thread Tom Lane
Lennart Poettering mzerq...@0pointer.de writes: On Wed, 21.03.12 20:39, Tom Lane (t...@redhat.com) wrote: ... what I find systemctl show producing is a line like Environment=PGPORT=5432 PGDATA=/var/lib/pgsql/data PGPORT=5433 So I have to pick this apart, understanding that later entries

Re: ARM as a primary architecture

2012-03-21 Thread Tom Lane
) get ARM builders that are fast enough to make it *practical* for ARM to be a PA. But I think denying that we need non-Intel PAs is just fundamentally wrongheaded. regards, tom lane -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org

Re: ARM as a primary architecture

2012-03-21 Thread Tom Lane
Kevin Kofler kevin.kof...@chello.at writes: Tom Lane wrote: I thought it was a serious error to drop PPC from primary-arch status. I think it was one of the best decisions Fedora ever made. I'm glad I don't have to deal with slow PPC builders anymore, nor to fix build errors

Does systemd expose any unit-file-parsing functionality?

2012-03-17 Thread Tom Lane
, and it was just pointed out to me that it completely fails to handle .include directives. So I'm wondering if there is anything in the systemd infrastructure that could help me do this in a more robust way. Ideas anyone? regards, tom lane -- devel mailing list devel

Re: Does systemd expose any unit-file-parsing functionality?

2012-03-17 Thread Tom Lane
Tomasz Torcz to...@pipebreaker.pl writes: On Sat, Mar 17, 2012 at 10:32:22AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote: I have a shell script that needs to dig the values of a couple of Environment= settings out of a systemd service file. Currently it just assumes it knows the search path for such things, finds

Re: Detecting Postgres version during build

2012-03-07 Thread Tom Lane
Well, what you need to build against is Postgres 9.1.x, because that is what is in current Fedora releases. I think you should just do -DPG91 and be done with it. You could BuildRequire postgresql-devel = 9.1.0 if that makes you feel better. regards, tom lane -- devel

Re: [ACTION NO LONGER REQUIRED] Retired packages for F-17

2012-03-07 Thread Tom Lane
of permanent round-robin FTBFS checks using idle buildfarm members? regards, tom lane -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: master branch still invokes build in f17-candidate??

2012-02-29 Thread Tom Lane
. regards, tom lane -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: master branch still invokes build in f17-candidate??

2012-02-28 Thread Tom Lane
, tom lane -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

master branch still invokes build in f17-candidate??

2012-02-27 Thread Tom Lane
(f17-candidate, /postgresql:2e73ff757cfdd20a708fc783e09ff23f3d8644e0): free 3822862 build (f17-candidate, /postgresql:2e73ff757cfdd20a708fc783e09ff23f3d8644e0): free - open (x86-02.phx2.fedoraproject.org) WTF? Do I need to fix this, and if so how? regards, tom lane

Re: master branch still invokes build in f17-candidate??

2012-02-27 Thread Tom Lane
Orion Poplawski or...@cora.nwra.com writes: On 02/27/2012 09:09 AM, Tom Lane wrote: WTF? Do I need to fix this, and if so how? git pull (to bring in the f17 branch and mark devel as f18) Hmm, that package indeed hadn't had f17 git pull'd yet. (I had scripted a git pull in all my package

Re: Looking for a package maintainer for flam3

2012-02-26 Thread Tom Lane
Bruno Wolff III br...@wolff.to writes: I also like keeping these from escalating to Tom Lane, who I'd rather see working on Postgres. I appreciate that too ;-) Thanks! regards, tom lane -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https

Re: mysql is now a critpath package? WTF?

2012-01-06 Thread Tom Lane
they should be looking into something like bdb. Embedded databases are simply different critters from database servers, and trying to pretend that code designed as the latter can be used as the former is not going to lead to anything but pain. regards, tom lane -- devel

mysql is now a critpath package? WTF?

2012-01-05 Thread Tom Lane
So I submitted a routine bodhi request for updating mysql, and was astonished to find that it's marked as critpath. It was never that before. Who decided this, and would it not have been polite to involve or at least notify the package maintainer? regards, tom lane

Re: mysql is now a critpath package? WTF?

2012-01-05 Thread Tom Lane
Dennis Gilmore den...@ausil.us writes: El Thu, 05 Jan 2012 12:16:34 -0500 Tom Lane t...@redhat.com escribió: So I submitted a routine bodhi request for updating mysql, and was astonished to find that it's marked as critpath. It was never that before. Who decided this, and would it not have

Re: mysql is now a critpath package? WTF?

2012-01-05 Thread Tom Lane
Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com writes: On Thu, Jan 5, 2012 at 5:36 PM, Tom Lane t...@redhat.com wrote: That answer doesn't make me any happier. I've got a problem with being saddled with an extra layer of bureaucracy without any say-so on my part, and I'm also quite nervous about

  1   2   3   >