lution).
> Can someone explain that topic a bit?
>
> kloczek
>
ISC DHCP uses BIND libraries e.g. to support Dynamic DNS updates on
authoritative DNS server when assigning leases to hosts. I don't think that
glibc resolver would be anyhow useful i
can be retired or please consider
maintaining python-adns as well.
Regards,
Tomas
--
Tomas Hozza
Associate Manager, Software Engineering - EMEA ENG Core Services
PGP: 1D9F3C2D
UTC+1 (CET)
Red Hat Inc. http://cz.redhat.com
___
devel
On 10/09/2016 09:58 PM, Peter Robinson wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 3, 2016 at 11:18 AM, Jan Kurik <jku...@redhat.com> wrote:
> > = Proposed Self Contained Change: BIND version 9.11 =
> > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/BIND_9.11
> >
> > Change owner(s):
> &
On 09/29/2016 10:36 AM, Igor Gnatenko wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 29, 2016 at 10:08 AM, Tomas Hozza <tho...@redhat.com> wrote:
> > On 09/29/2016 06:19 AM, Bojan Smojver wrote:
> >> Could someone with sufficient access please spin up an update of bind
> >> for F-24 and o
he updates shortly. The problem with Fedora is that we can not
prepare the update in advance as for RHEL, because everything (git repos,
update system, etc.) is public.
Regards,
Tomas
--
Tomas Hozza
Associate Manager, Software Engineering - EMEA ENG Mainstream RHEL
PGP: 1D9F3C2D
UTC+2
On 07.04.2016 15:50, James Hogarth wrote:
>
>
> On 7 April 2016 at 14:26, Tomas Hozza <tho...@redhat.com
> <mailto:tho...@redhat.com>> wrote:
>
> Hi all.
>
> We pushed an update for log4cplus in F24+ [1]. It is a rebase and one of
> the depend
[1] https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-53b6df64eb
Regards,
--
Tomas Hozza
Senior Software Engineer - EMEA ENG Developer Experience
PGP: 1D9F3C2D
UTC+1 (CET)
Red Hat Inc. http://cz.redhat.com
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject
On 07.12.2015 12:23, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> On Mon, 07.12.15 10:48, Tomas Hozza (tho...@redhat.com) wrote:
>
>> On 04.12.2015 15:57, Lennart Poettering wrote:
>>> On Tue, 01.12.15 11:15, Tomas Hozza (tho...@redhat.com) wrote:
>>>
>>>> You are not
't want
to be picked on. This is completely out of context.
Tomas
--
Tomas Hozza
Software Engineer - EMEA ENG Developer Experience
PGP: 1D9F3C2D
UTC+1 (CET)
Red Hat Inc. http://cz.redhat.com
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
On 07.12.2015 15:15, Richard Hughes wrote:
> On 7 December 2015 at 14:04, Tomas Hozza <tho...@redhat.com> wrote:
>> I took this conversation as a mean for improvement.
>
> When an email is titled "F24 System Wide Change" I think a lot of
> people (like me) we
On 07.12.2015 15:00, Matthew Miller wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 07, 2015 at 02:59:18PM +0100, Tomas Hozza wrote:
> >> I agree with Lennart. Whether or not this is expected to work with
> >> DNSSEC is of academic interest given that people will expect it to work
> >> with
On 07.12.2015 16:44, Andrew Lutomirski wrote:
>
> On Dec 7, 2015 1:49 AM, "Tomas Hozza" <tho...@redhat.com
> <mailto:tho...@redhat.com>> wrote:
> >
> > On 04.12.2015 15:57, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> > > On Tue, 01.12.15 11:15, Tomas Hozza
t; Florian
> --
> devel mailing list
> devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
>
--
Tomas Hozza
Software Engineer - EMEA ENG Developer Experience
PGP: 1D9F3C2D
UTC+1 (CET)
Red Hat Inc.
On 03.12.2015 15:40, Adam Miller wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 3, 2015 at 8:12 AM, Tomas Hozza <tho...@redhat.com> wrote:
> > On 03.12.2015 14:54, Jan Kurik wrote:
> >> On Thu, Dec 3, 2015 at 2:38 PM, Tomas Hozza <tho...@redhat.com> wrote:
> >>> On 03.12.2015
Crane
> * * Docker Registry
>
> == Scope ==
> For the Scope of this Change please check
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Layered_Docker_Image_Build_Service#Scope
>
Hi.
The "Ongoing Work Tracking" link does not work.
How is this different from the proposal
On 03.12.2015 14:54, Jan Kurik wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 3, 2015 at 2:38 PM, Tomas Hozza <tho...@redhat.com> wrote:
>> On 03.12.2015 11:40, Jan Kurik wrote:
>>> = Proposed System Wide Change: Layered Docker Image Build Service =
>>> https
by libvirt). I'll
review
the change wiki in this regard.
> * howto get domainname set automatically from dhcp
As discussed in the Bug, this is not going to work and it is expected not to.
Setting search domains from DHCP is a security issue.
Tomas
> --
> devel mailing list
> devel@li
gt; > = Default Local DNS Resolver =
> > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Default_Local_DNS_Resolver
> >
> > Change owner(s):
> > * P J P
> > * Pavel Šimerda
> > * Tomas Hozza
> > * Petr Špaček
> >
> > Plain DNS protocol is insecu
On 01.12.2015 16:06, Björn Persson wrote:
> Tomas Hozza <tho...@redhat.com> wrote:
> > - dnssec-trigger does not do the Captive Portal detection and handling and
> > we rather rely on NM for the detection and on Gnome Shell for the Portal
> > login
>
> Can
On 01.12.2015 13:28, Tomas Mraz wrote:
> On Út, 2015-12-01 at 11:15 +0100, Tomas Hozza wrote:
> > You are not mistaken.
> >
> > This is the third time, because previously we rather moved the change to the
> > next Fedora to bring better user experience. Every time there
On 25.11.2015 10:03, Tomas Hozza wrote:
> Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FESCo
> meeting Wednesday at 18:00UTC in #fedora-meeting on irc.freenode.net.
>
> To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at
> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/UTCH
at the end of the meeting, during
the open floor topic. Note that added topics may be deferred until
the following meeting.
Regards,
--
Tomas Hozza
Software Engineer - EMEA ENG Developer Experience
PGP: 1D9F3C2D
UTC+1 (CET)
Red Hat Inc. http://cz.redhat.com
--
devel mailing list
would be IPv6 only - as long
> > as there is no IPv4-only user who cares - it's correct way.
>
> Whether a package is IPv6 only and whether a package works with
> ipv6.disabled=1 are two distinct things that need to be tested
> separately. On the other IPv6 only packages
/Default_Local_DNS_Resolver
[2] https://www.piratepad.ca/p/default-dns-resolver-f23
[3] https://bluejeans.com/s/8pTY/
Regards,
--
Tomas Hozza
Software Engineer - EMEA ENG Developer Experience
PGP: 1D9F3C2D
Red Hat Inc. http://cz.redhat.com
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https
On 02.07.2015 17:56, Chris Murphy wrote:
On Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 9:45 AM, Stephen Gallagher sgall...@redhat.com wrote:
On Thu, 2015-07-02 at 10:33 -0500, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
On Thu, 2015-07-02 at 09:55 +0200, Tomas Hozza wrote:
* AGREED: Netizen is not approved as spin. We approve
)
* plautrba (4)
* jkurik (4)
* mfabian (2)
* maxamillion (2)
* pravins (2)
* mitr (1)
* jkurik_mtg (1)
* hguemar (0)
* rishi (0)
* nirik (0)
* dgilmore (0)
Generated by `MeetBot`_ 0.1.4
.. _`MeetBot`: http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot
On 30.06.2015 12:02, Tomas Hozza wrote:
Following is the list
On 30.06.2015 13:46, Stef Walter wrote:
On 30.06.2015 11:24, Tomas Hozza wrote:
On 26.06.2015 17:13, Matthias Clasen wrote:
On Tue, 2015-06-23 at 18:43 +0200, Tomas Hozza wrote:
Hey, I was out for a week, so this may be a bit of a late reply.
As Michael and Bastien already stated, all
On 30.06.2015 13:58, Stef Walter wrote:
On 30.06.2015 13:53, Bastien Nocera wrote:
- Original Message -
On 30.06.2015 11:24, Tomas Hozza wrote:
snip
It means that the site of your bank you are on may not be provided the
actual host you should be connected to, but instead by some
On 30.06.2015 13:53, Bastien Nocera wrote:
- Original Message -
On 30.06.2015 11:24, Tomas Hozza wrote:
snip
It means that the site of your bank you are on may not be provided the
actual host you should be connected to, but instead by some attacker's.
The insecure mode means
On 30.06.2015 14:11, Bastien Nocera wrote:
- Original Message -
On 30.06.2015 13:53, Bastien Nocera wrote:
- Original Message -
On 30.06.2015 11:24, Tomas Hozza wrote:
snip
It means that the site of your bank you are on may not be provided the
actual host you should
On 30.06.2015 14:37, Bastien Nocera wrote:
- Original Message -
snip
No, it is not. It is opt-in now, we want it by default. Please read the
change. Thank you.
I don't see any options about it in GNOME's Network panel. I'm not interested
in integration as an after-thought.
On 30.06.2015 16:07, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
On Tue, 2015-06-30 at 11:24 +0200, Tomas Hozza wrote:
The thing is that some information are unrelated to NM. There is no
reason to push all information back to NetworkManager, since its role
is
explicitly defined - manage network connections
On 30.06.2015 16:07, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
On Tue, 2015-06-30 at 14:23 +0200, Tomas Hozza wrote:
Except that this is exactly what we DON'T want to do. DNSSEC is an
extension of DNS and it can be used even without the need for the
whole
Internet to be signed. We want to use it even
email.
Thanks in advance.
Regards,
--
Tomas Hozza
Software Engineer - EMEA ENG Developer Experience
PGP: 1D9F3C2D
Red Hat Inc. http://cz.redhat.com
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http
Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FESCo
meeting Wednesday at 18:00UTC in #fedora-meeting on irc.freenode.net.
To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/UTCHowto
or run:
date -d '2015-07-01 18:00 UTC'
Links to all tickets
On 26.06.2015 17:13, Matthias Clasen wrote:
On Tue, 2015-06-23 at 18:43 +0200, Tomas Hozza wrote:
Hey, I was out for a week, so this may be a bit of a late reply.
As Michael and Bastien already stated, all the GNOME networking UI
relies on information gotten from NetworkManager, and we'd
://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot
On 23.06.2015 17:43, Tomas Hozza wrote:
Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FESCo
meeting Wednesday at 18:00UTC in #fedora-meeting on irc.freenode.net.
To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/UTCHowto
Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FESCo
meeting Wednesday at 18:00UTC in #fedora-meeting on irc.freenode.net.
To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/UTCHowto
or run:
date -d '2015-06-24 18:00 UTC'
Links to all tickets
specific
solutions and pieces we can start working on.
Thanks.
Regards,
--
Tomas Hozza
Software Engineer - EMEA ENG Developer Experience
PGP: 1D9F3C2D
Red Hat Inc. http://cz.redhat.com
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman
love to see more will for cooperation from GNOME people, so we
can converge to the working and well integrated solution. Vague claims
that something is missing or something needs to be done, without clear
reasoning is not helping anyone.
Cheers
--
Tomas Hozza
Software Engineer - EMEA ENG Developer
On 17.06.2015 16:22, Paul Wouters wrote:
On Wed, 17 Jun 2015, Tomas Hozza wrote:
While I don't actually care, this might well be a sticking point for
many people since their DNS information is going to an untrusted (to
them) DNS server. Yeah, I tend to trust Fedora, but not everyone
of concept of how to do client side DNSSEC
validation properly.
Tomas
Paul
--
Tomas Hozza
Software Engineer - EMEA ENG Developer Experience
PGP: 1D9F3C2D
Red Hat Inc. http://cz.redhat.com
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman
On 12.06.2015 18:58, Dan Williams wrote:
On Fri, 2015-06-12 at 10:58 +0200, Tomas Hozza wrote:
On 11.06.2015 22:48, Dan Williams wrote:
On Tue, 2015-06-09 at 12:30 -0400, Matthew Miller wrote:
On Tue, Jun 09, 2015 at 11:34:39AM -0400, Paul Wouters wrote:
decision needs to then be made
guidelines to include some note
on git submodules. If you have some proposed draft of the change (e.g.
describing the current approach used in other packages) I think it is a
good idea to include it.
[1] https://fedorahosted.org/fpc/
Regards,
Tomas
--
Tomas Hozza
Software Engineer - EMEA ENG
done only by the dnssec-trigger based on the information passed
by VPN to the NM.
Tomas
--
Tomas Hozza
Software Engineer - EMEA ENG Developer Experience
PGP: 1D9F3C2D
Red Hat Inc. http://cz.redhat.com
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https
it
will clean up after itself and return back the system to the original
state. Of course you can remove it if you wish :)
All these sub-problems (including VPN handling an so on) are solved by
dnssec-trigger with tweaks by Tomas Hozza and Pavel Simerda.
HERE we need to coordinate with other
a design for this which integrates better with GNOME
Shell and the existing network icon there.
I hope too.
Regards,
Tomas
--
Tomas Hozza
Software Engineer - EMEA ENG Developer Experience
PGP: 1D9F3C2D
Red Hat Inc. http://cz.redhat.com
--
devel mailing list
devel
to contact some GNOME guys and ask them for help.
Thank you for your comments!
Regards,
--
Tomas Hozza
Software Engineer - EMEA ENG Developer Experience
PGP: 1D9F3C2D
Red Hat Inc. http://cz.redhat.com
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https
-2.5.1-3.fc22.1.x86_64
So this needs to be installed without the --disablerepo=* argument.
Tomas
--
Tomas Hozza
Software Engineer - EMEA ENG Developer Experience
PGP: 1D9F3C2D
Red Hat Inc. http://cz.redhat.com
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https
On 06/02/2015 06:44 PM, Paul Wouters wrote:
On Tue, 2 Jun 2015, David Howells wrote:
Install a local DNS resolver trusted for the DNSSEC validation
running on
127.0.0.1:53. This must be the only name server entry in
/etc/resolv.conf.
The automatic name server entries received via
On 06/01/2015 03:32 PM, Matthew Miller wrote:
On Mon, Jun 01, 2015 at 08:03:27AM -0400, Jan Kurik wrote:
People use Fedora on portable/mobile devices which are connected to
diverse networks as and when required. The automatic DNS
configurations provided by these networks are never
that use ISC's DLV in their default configuration in Fedora.
If you are aware of any other component, please file a bug and add it to the
tracking bug:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1223360
Thanks!
Regards,
Tomas
--
Tomas Hozza
Software Engineer - EMEA ENG Developer Experience
On 03/10/2015 04:06 PM, Tomas Hozza wrote:
Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FESCo
meeting Wednesday at 18:00UTC in #fedora-meeting on irc.freenode.net.
To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/UTCHowto
or run:
date -d
Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FESCo
meeting Wednesday at 18:00UTC in #fedora-meeting on irc.freenode.net.
To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/UTCHowto
or run:
date -d '2015-03-11 18:00 UTC'
Links to all tickets
On 02/01/2015 10:39 AM, Alec Leamas wrote:
On 30/01/15 16:10, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
On Fri, 30 Jan 2015 15:58:00 +0100
Alec Leamas leamas.a...@gmail.com wrote:
There were not really any questions directly related to products.
Perhaps some could be added next time?
In any case, I am in
you think this? I don't see any reason why the new tmp-inst directories
can
not be on tmpfs...
Incidentally, why /tmp-inst but /var/tmp/tmp-inst? Why not /tmp/tmp-inst for
/tmp or /var/tmp-inst for /var/tmp? Shouldn't the naming be consistent?
Tom
Regards,
--
Tomas Hozza
Software Engineer
tons of hackish options. From this point of view, the choice
is pretty clear I think.
Regards,
--
Tomas Hozza
Software Engineer - EMEA ENG Developer Experience
PGP: 1D9F3C2D
Red Hat Inc. http://cz.redhat.com
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https
contributions in testing the setup. Hopefully
you recognize some of the improvements done based on your reports.
Regards,
--
Tomas Hozza
Software Engineer - EMEA ENG Developer Experience
PGP: 1D9F3C2D
Red Hat Inc. http://cz.redhat.com
--
devel mailing list
devel
On 01/15/2015 05:15 PM, Luke Macken wrote:
On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 10:19:19AM +0100, Tomas Hozza wrote:
Hi all.
When upgrading F20 to F21 using FedUp, some users had a problem
with some packages not being upgraded (e.g. [1]). The problem was
caused by broken update path F20 - F21
Hi all.
I updated BIND to the latest stable 9.10 version in rawhide,
as discussed here [1]. Feel free to try it out.
[1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/BIND_9.10
Regards,
--
Tomas Hozza
Software Engineer - EMEA ENG Developer Experience
PGP: 1D9F3C2D
Red Hat Inc
be. However I think such task should be
automated.
Would it be possible to enforce such a thing for updates in bodhi?
[1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1176403
Regards,
--
Tomas Hozza
Software Engineer - EMEA ENG Developer Experience
PGP: 1D9F3C2D
Red Hat Inc. http://cz.redhat.com
On 12/09/2014 07:22 PM, Tomas Hozza wrote:
Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FESCo
meeting Wednesday at 18:00UTC in #fedora-meeting on irc.freenode.net.
To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/UTCHowto
or run:
date -d
Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FESCo
meeting Wednesday at 18:00UTC in #fedora-meeting on irc.freenode.net.
To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/UTCHowto
or run:
date -d '2014-12-10 18:00 UTC'
Links to all tickets
On 11/21/2014 09:04 AM, P J P wrote:
On Friday, 21 November 2014 1:24 PM, Florian Weimer wrote:
On 11/21/2014 08:34 AM, Jan Kratochvil wrote:
Almost all of my Fedora installations are test VMs where
any security is irrelevant.
Okay. But does enabling root login offer any significant
On 11/20/2014 08:05 AM, Till Maas wrote:
On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 03:06:11PM -0500, Tomas Mraz wrote:
* #1368 How to deal with F21 broken dependencies (t8m, 19:08:56)
* AGREED: FESCo agrees to dropping the packages with broken
dependencies listed in #1368 from both F21 and rawhide
problems.
However in thins case it might be worth deciding if such .repo should be named
in a way to express it contains also a bundle of dependent repos.
Regards,
--
Tomas Hozza
Software Engineer - EMEA ENG Developer Experience
PGP: 1D9F3C2D
Red Hat Inc. http
will be installed/enabled as dependencies,
so the user is kind of informed what extra repos will be installed and enabled.
gets changed (on the server's side).
Let's discuss this a bit, I'm eager to hear your opinions.
Cheers,
Honza
--
Tomas Hozza
Software Engineer - EMEA ENG
break someone's setup, please let me know
so we can work on some solution. Otherwise I'll do the changes
some day next week.
Thank you.
Regards,
- --
Tomas Hozza
Software Engineer - EMEA ENG Developer Experience
PGP: 1D9F3C2D
Red Hat Inc. http://cz.redhat.com
-BEGIN
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 09/25/2014 05:18 PM, Paul Wouters wrote:
On Thu, 25 Sep 2014, Tomas Hozza wrote:
I would like to inform everyone about changes I plan to do
in Fedora 20+ due to Bug 1097752 (Support for native PKCS#11
interface - needed by FreeIPA
On 09/16/2014 01:34 PM, Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
= Proposed Self Contained Change: BIND version 9.10 =
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/BIND_9.10
Change owner(s): Tomas Hozza tho...@redhat.com
BIND (Berkeley Internet Name Domain) version 9.10 is the latest stable major
update
===
#fedora-meeting: FESCO (2014-08-20)
===
Meeting started by thozza at 17:04:28 UTC. The full logs are available
at
http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2014-08-20/fesco.2014-08-20-17.04.log.html
.
Meeting summary
Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FESCo
meeting Wednesday at 17:00UTC in #fedora-meeting on irc.freenode.net.
To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/UTCHowto
or run:
date -d '-MM-DD 17:00 UTC'
Links to all tickets
On Tue 19 Aug 2014 01:40:55 PM CEST, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 08/19/2014 04:14 AM, Tomas Hozza wrote:
Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the
FESCo meeting Wednesday at 17:00UTC in #fedora-meeting on
irc.freenode.net
.
There's very little he can do.”
Thank you.
Regards,
- --
Tomas Hozza
Software Engineer - EMEA ENG Developer Experience
PGP: 1D9F3C2D
Red Hat Inc. http://cz.redhat.com
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1
iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJT82i/AAoJEMWIetUdnzwtooYH
On Tue 19 Aug 2014 05:12:31 PM CEST, Chris Adams wrote:
Once upon a time, Tomas Hozza tho...@redhat.com said:
That's where seccomp kicks in, it acts as a 2nd wall of defence. In case
of a security hole being present in the server process, it goes further
than a chroot, it prevents the attacker
-project-renamed-bundy/
[2] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1130617
Regards,
--
Tomas Hozza
Software Engineer - EMEA ENG Developer Experience
PGP: 1D9F3C2D
Red Hat Inc. http://cz.redhat.com
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https
one branch:
(Note that many of them have co-maintainers, so do check with them to
see if any of them would like to become the new point of contact):
atlas
Taken by fkluknav
Regards,
--
Tomas Hozza
Software Engineer - EMEA ENG Developer Experience
PGP: 1D9F3C2D
Red Hat Inc
and finished today.
I think it is OK if you remove his acls right away.
Regards,
--
Tomas Hozza
Software Engineer - EMEA ENG Developer Experience
PGP: 1D9F3C2D
Red Hat Inc. http://cz.redhat.com
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https
and proper
understanding. I think all important changes should be thoroughly discussed
and not made silently.
Have you any questions, feel free to ping me on IRC (#fedora-devel) or
drop an email.
Tomas
[1]
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Development/SteeringCommittee/Nominations#Candidates
--
Tomas
'/var/named/chroot_sdb'.
Regards,
Tomas Hozza
___
devel-announce mailing list
devel-annou...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel-announce
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https
to open-source projects for free [1]. I think
some projects are already using it (at least Squid). So if upstream projects
are interested, they can sign up for free.
[1] https://scan.coverity.com/
Regards,
Tomas Hozza
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https
these packages to be deprecated in rawhide,
or what can I do with them? I don't want to take maintenance
of those packages.
Dependent packages I have problem with are:
- obexfs
- obexftp
- libopensync-plugin-irmc
Thanks in advance for any help/opinion.
Regards,
Tomas Hozza
[1] https
/
If someone thinks we should not rebase openobex to the latest version
and has a good reason for it, feel free to replay to this email.
Thanks!
Regards,
Tomas Hozza
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code
83 matches
Mail list logo
