On Tue, May 30, 2023, 3:13 AM Miro Hrončok wrote:
> Hi Troy.
>
> On 29. 05. 23 18:01, Troy Curtis Jr wrote:
> > I'm currently working on the update for python-Levenshtein [1] and I
> have a
> > question about the best way to proceed.
> >
> > In the intervening
I'm currently working on the update for python-Levenshtein [1] and I have a
question about the best way to proceed.
In the intervening time since the last release we have packaged, a new
maintainer has taken over maintenance, and built the updates around a stack
of other packages (rapidfuzz-cpp,
On Tue, Oct 12, 2021, 10:14 PM Luya Tshimbalanga
wrote:
>
> On 2021-10-12 15:37, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I would like to put out a public call for a new primary owner for
> > ImageMagick[1].
> >
> > I only picked it up a few years ago to prevent it from being orphaned,
> >
On Mon, Sep 20, 2021 at 8:44 AM Fabio Valentini
wrote:
> ...
- ulauncher-0:5.13.0-1.fc34 > ulauncher-0:5.12.1-1.fc35
> ...
I just submitted the new ulauncher 5.14 update
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-894c62b141 (and
similarly for F34) so it should be resolved shortly.
On Sun, Aug 22, 2021 at 10:16 AM Iago Rubio wrote:
> On Sun, 2021-08-22 at 09:00 -0400, Troy Curtis Jr wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Aug 11, 2021 at 6:25 PM Mukundan Ragavan <
> > nonamed...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > I am orphaning rarian (https://src.fedoraproject.or
On Wed, Aug 11, 2021 at 6:25 PM Mukundan Ragavan
wrote:
>
> I am orphaning rarian (https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/rarian). As
> far as I can tell, nothing in Fedora depends on it anymore.
>
> # dnf repoquery --releasever rawhide --whatrequires librarian\*
> Last metadata expiration check:
On Mon, Feb 15, 2021 at 10:02 PM Dominique Martinet
wrote:
> Michael Catanzaro wrote on Mon, Feb 15, 2021 at 08:46:57PM -0600:
> > We removed the fallbacks due to complaints from users who didn't want DNS
> > ever going to Cloudflare or Google. So the lack of fallback is expected
> and
> >
On Sat, Aug 4, 2018 at 5:16 PM Miro Hrončok wrote:
> Hi,
>
> an interesting discussion came up in the Python Maint team recently,
> about not shipping python3-debug and python2-debug.
>
> On the Chesterton's fence principle [0], I'd would like to know why are
> we building and shipping them
On Mon, Nov 6, 2017, 5:02 AM Petr Viktorin <pvikt...@redhat.com> wrote:
> On 11/05/2017 08:39 PM, Troy Curtis Jr wrote:
> > So, do upstream contributions count toward Parselmouth badges? ;)
>
> I'm afraid the way they're set up now, they're just for the Fedora
> packages
On Wed, Nov 1, 2017 at 5:49 PM Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski <
domi...@greysector.net> wrote:
> Dear Fedora,
>
>
..snip..
> This breaks, for example, rsyslog-8.30.0-3, which was compiled against
> libfastjson-0.99.7, but didn't go out together with it, so when I ran
> dnf update, the set
I'd like to know what everyone's take on the best way to build python
extensions for both python2 and python3 when the upstream build system can
only build for one at time.
The path I took for the gpsd update I submitted was to use two independent
source trees, then build one for python2 and
What is the story with the python3 portingdb instance (
http://fedora.portingdb.xyz/)? It's been down for quite a while now.
Troy
___
python-devel mailing list -- python-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to
On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 7:01 AM Petr Viktorin wrote:
> It's only automatic for Bugzilla. If upstream is not using the Fedora/RH
> bugzilla (which it shouldn't, really), a URL for the upstream discussion
> needs to be added manually. And of course you can open a portingdb
>
On Mon, Sep 4, 2017 at 3:54 AM Petr Viktorin <pvikt...@redhat.com> wrote:
> On 09/04/2017 06:21 AM, Troy Curtis Jr wrote:
> > I have a version of the gpsd package which I believe addresses this
> > ticket https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1390812. I've been
>
I have a version of the gpsd package which I believe addresses this ticket
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1390812. I've been looking
around about the right way to submit. I thought it would be by using a
pull request from within the pagure instance at src.fedoraproject.org.
However,
On Sat, Sep 2, 2017 at 7:40 AM Miro Hrončok <mhron...@redhat.com> wrote:
> On 2.9.2017 05:53, Troy Curtis Jr wrote:
> > Howdy,
>
> Hi Troy,
>
> > I'd like to help work toward the Fedora move toward Python 3. There is
> > lots of good information out there
Howdy,
I'd like to help work toward the Fedora move toward Python 3. There is
lots of good information out there about much of the process, but I did
have a few questions about how you like to do things, and the proper
work-flow.
If I start working on a particular package, should I mention as
17 matches
Mail list logo