Bootstrapping build-time circular dependent packages

2015-02-12 Thread Vladimir Stackov
Say we have two packages:

Name: a
Requires: b
BuildRequires: b

and

Name: b
Requires: a
BuildRequires: a

I can bootstrap them by building and installing manually before
rpmbuild but how should I do that with koji?
Thanks for any advices!

-- 
Kind regards,
Vladimir.
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct

Ownership of a retired package (python-zfec)

2015-01-25 Thread Vladimir Stackov
Greetings,

I would like to claim ownership of retired package [1] and according to [2]
I'm announcing this.
I'm going to maintain this package for EL6/7 and Fedora so if anyone was
already working on this package please let me know.
The reason for picking up this package is that I need it to use with [3].

[1] https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/python-zfec/
[2]
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Orphaned_package_that_need_new_maintainers#Claiming_Ownership_of_a_Retired_Package
[3] https://apps.fedoraproject.org/packages/zbackup

-- 
Kind regards,
Vladimir.
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct

Re: Firefox Aurora in rawhide

2014-12-30 Thread Vladimir Stackov
It will be great!

2014-12-30 19:09 GMT+03:00 Alexander Ploumistos alex.ploumis...@gmail.com:

 Would it make sense to include Firefox Aurora / Developer Edition in
 rawhide?

 --
 devel mailing list
 devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
 Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct




-- 
Kind regards,
Vladimir.
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct

Re: Sponsorship request

2014-12-19 Thread Vladimir Stackov
Greetings,

you should probably read zbackup description (available on
http://zbackup.org/) and perform backup/restore on multiple VM images.

All software that you are talking about (rdiff-backup, rsnapshot, amanda,
backuppc, bacula and tons of homegrown bash backup systems) does not
provide real deduplication.
All of that symlinks/hardlinks tricks isn't deduplication at all.
We use a 64-bit modified Rabin-Karp rolling hash with sliding window that
performs checking with a single-byte granularity. It was even better than
ZFS deduplication.
Take a try and then we will talk about Yet Another Incompatible Backup
Paradigm(tm) that you will probably pronounce as next-gen backup
paradigm after you will give a try ;)

Yep, not first next-gen backup paradigm but one of two opensource
next-gen backup software because all other software that performs
deduplication with sliding window was closed-source proprietary systems.

Thanks!

2014-12-19 16:40 GMT+03:00 Nico Kadel-Garcia nka...@gmail.com:

 On Fri, Dec 19, 2014 at 2:38 AM, Vladimir Stackov amigo.el...@gmail.com
 wrote:
  Greetings, Fedora developers,
 
  I'm coming to you with one small request:
  I'm asking you for a sponsorship for this review request:
  https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1172525
  I understand that I'm somewhat obsessive but counting on your patience :)
 
  Thanks!
 
  --
  King regards,
  Vladimir.

 Have you actually found this kind of pick and choose deduplication
 in your backup software to be effective? I've generally found that the
 integral hard-linking across backups of tools like rsnapshot to be
 much more effective, and if you need to use compressed backups or tape
 for archival storage, the stability and long lifespan and tape backup
 support of tools like AMANDA to be more reliable than the creation of
 Yet Another Incompatible Backup Paradigm(tm) which lacks some of their
 features. The need to pick and choose and re-assemble components
 among the tarballs is one that's historically prone to errors among
 backups.

 It's not a moral objection to the approach, but wondering why is it
 needed? AMANDA already does incremental tarball backups, it can
 support encryption, it supports tape drive backup quite effectively,
 and it has commercial support available for more complex environments
 with the ZMANDA company. And rsnapshot does very effective
 de-duplicated full mirrors which can be NFS read-only exported for
 clients to recover their own files: this has been invaluable for
 allowing users to recover their files without having to provide
 sophisticated admin access to the backup syste. So I'm not sure why
 you need yet another tool.
 --
 devel mailing list
 devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
 Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct



-- 
Kind regards,
Vladimir.
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct

Re: Sponsorship request

2014-12-19 Thread Vladimir Stackov
In addition to my previous message:

Take a look on ddar vs rdiff-backup comparison:
https://github.com/basak/ddar/wiki/rdiff-backup
Most of those concepts are applicable to zbackup.

2014-12-19 17:30 GMT+03:00 Vladimir Stackov amigo.el...@gmail.com:

 Greetings,

 you should probably read zbackup description (available on
 http://zbackup.org/) and perform backup/restore on multiple VM images.

 All software that you are talking about (rdiff-backup, rsnapshot, amanda,
 backuppc, bacula and tons of homegrown bash backup systems) does not
 provide real deduplication.
 All of that symlinks/hardlinks tricks isn't deduplication at all.
 We use a 64-bit modified Rabin-Karp rolling hash with sliding window that
 performs checking with a single-byte granularity. It was even better than
 ZFS deduplication.
 Take a try and then we will talk about Yet Another Incompatible Backup
 Paradigm(tm) that you will probably pronounce as next-gen backup
 paradigm after you will give a try ;)

 Yep, not first next-gen backup paradigm but one of two opensource
 next-gen backup software because all other software that performs
 deduplication with sliding window was closed-source proprietary systems.

 Thanks!

 2014-12-19 16:40 GMT+03:00 Nico Kadel-Garcia nka...@gmail.com:

 On Fri, Dec 19, 2014 at 2:38 AM, Vladimir Stackov amigo.el...@gmail.com
 wrote:
  Greetings, Fedora developers,
 
  I'm coming to you with one small request:
  I'm asking you for a sponsorship for this review request:
  https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1172525
  I understand that I'm somewhat obsessive but counting on your patience
 :)
 
  Thanks!
 
  --
  King regards,
  Vladimir.

 Have you actually found this kind of pick and choose deduplication
 in your backup software to be effective? I've generally found that the
 integral hard-linking across backups of tools like rsnapshot to be
 much more effective, and if you need to use compressed backups or tape
 for archival storage, the stability and long lifespan and tape backup
 support of tools like AMANDA to be more reliable than the creation of
 Yet Another Incompatible Backup Paradigm(tm) which lacks some of their
 features. The need to pick and choose and re-assemble components
 among the tarballs is one that's historically prone to errors among
 backups.

 It's not a moral objection to the approach, but wondering why is it
 needed? AMANDA already does incremental tarball backups, it can
 support encryption, it supports tape drive backup quite effectively,
 and it has commercial support available for more complex environments
 with the ZMANDA company. And rsnapshot does very effective
 de-duplicated full mirrors which can be NFS read-only exported for
 clients to recover their own files: this has been invaluable for
 allowing users to recover their files without having to provide
 sophisticated admin access to the backup syste. So I'm not sure why
 you need yet another tool.
 --
 devel mailing list
 devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
 Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct



 --
 Kind regards,
 Vladimir.



-- 
Kind regards,
Vladimir.
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct

Re: Sponsorship request

2014-12-19 Thread Vladimir Stackov
Thank you!

2014-12-20 0:22 GMT+03:00 Mikolaj Izdebski mizde...@redhat.com:

 On 12/19/2014 08:38 AM, Vladimir Stackov wrote:
  Greetings, Fedora developers,
 
  I'm coming to you with one small request:
  I'm asking you for a sponsorship for this review request:
  https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1172525
  I understand that I'm somewhat obsessive but counting on your patience :)

 I've taken the review and I will sponsor you.

 --
 Mikolaj Izdebski
 Software Engineer, Red Hat
 IRC: mizdebsk
 --
 devel mailing list
 devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
 Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct



-- 
Kind regards,
Vladimir.
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct

Sponsorship request

2014-12-18 Thread Vladimir Stackov
Greetings, Fedora developers,

I'm coming to you with one small request:
I'm asking you for a sponsorship for this review request:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1172525
I understand that I'm somewhat obsessive but counting on your patience :)

Thanks!

-- 
King regards,
Vladimir.
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct

Self Introduction: Vladimir Stackov

2014-12-10 Thread Vladimir Stackov
Greetings, Fedora lovers,

I'm glad to introduce myself to you.
I'm 15+ years developer/admin with mainly perl-experience (also I
write on C#/C/C++/Java) and would to like to make a contribution to
Fedora.
I'm going to maintain zbackup package for Fedora and EPEL.
I'm also one of the zbackup contributors and one of two zbackup
upstream maintainers.

Here is my first review request:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1172525

--

Thanks,
Vladimir Stackov.
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct

Re: Self Introduction: Vladimir Stackov

2014-12-10 Thread Vladimir Stackov
Thank you!

Yes, it will be implemented till v1.7-1.8.

2014-12-10 20:10 GMT+03:00 Matthew Miller mat...@fedoraproject.org:

 On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 02:06:25PM +0400, Vladimir Stackov wrote:
  I'm glad to introduce myself to you.
  I'm 15+ years developer/admin with mainly perl-experience (also I
  write on C#/C/C++/Java) and would to like to make a contribution to
  Fedora.
  I'm going to maintain zbackup package for Fedora and EPEL.
  I'm also one of the zbackup contributors and one of two zbackup
  upstream maintainers.

 Hi, and welcome! zbackup looks really cool. Have you thought about
 adding Reed-Solomon codes as a built-in feature for error correction?


 --
 Matthew Miller
 mat...@fedoraproject.org
 Fedora Project Leader
 --
 devel mailing list
 devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
 Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct




-- 
С уважением,
Владимир.
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct