in before the 6.3 release next Monday, that way it
>> will automatically follow into stable Fedora as they get the 6.3
>> rebase.
>>
>> Justin
>>
>> > John Kacur
>> >
>> > On Sun, Apr 9, 2023 at 12:12 AM Zamir SUN wrote:
>> >>
On 4/5/23 23:49, Justin Forbes wrote:
On Wed, Apr 5, 2023 at 5:05 AM Zamir SUN wrote:
Hi,
I'm working on libtraceevent and libtracefs update. There will be soname
bump happening to them. Namely,
libtraceevent.so 1.6.3 -> 1.7.2
libtracefs.so 1.5.0 -> 1.6.4
IIRC only kernel-tool
Hi Fabio,
On 4/5/23 21:38, Fabio Valentini wrote:
On Wed, Apr 5, 2023 at 12:04 PM Zamir SUN wrote:
Hi,
I'm working on libtraceevent and libtracefs update. There will be soname
bump happening to them. Namely,
libtraceevent.so 1.6.3 -> 1.7.2
libtracefs.so 1.5.0 -> 1.6.4
IIRC
On 4/5/23 18:25, Jerome Marchand wrote:
On 05/04/2023 12:03, Zamir SUN wrote:
Hi,
I'm working on libtraceevent and libtracefs update. There will be
soname bump happening to them. Namely,
libtraceevent.so 1.6.3 -> 1.7.2
libtracefs.so 1.5.0 -> 1.6.4
IIRC only kernel-tools (f
o update it in both Rawhide and Fedora 38 this week.
HTH.
--
Zamir SUN
GPG : 1D86 6D4A 49CE 4BBD 72CF FCF5 D856 6E11 F2A0 525E
Want to know more about Fedora?
Visit https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/
Ready to contribute? See https://whatcanidoforfedora.org/
想了解更多中文资讯,访问
guage.
Thanks in advance!
[1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2149999
--
Zamir SUN
GPG : 1D86 6D4A 49CE 4BBD 72CF FCF5 D856 6E11 F2A0 525E
Want to know more about Fedora?
Visit https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/
Ready to contribute? See https://whatcanidoforfedora.org/
想了解更多中文资讯,访问
.
So I'm writing to see if we can have more packagers to help. If you want
to help keep the Deepin desktop environment alive in Fedora, feel free
to drop us an email. I'm willing to add you as a co-maintainers.
Much appreciated!
Zamir SUN on behalf of the DeepinDE SIG
--
Zamir SUN
On 10/11/22 23:36, Zamir SUN wrote:
Hi,
I'm updating libtraceevent, libtracefs to newer versions and rebuilding
the dependencies libtracecmd, trace-cmd, kernelshark. This caused soname
bump as the following
libtraceevent.so to 1.6.3
libtracefs.so to 1.5.0
And also the following
9 PM Friday evening (Oct 14th) UTC+8.
--
Zamir SUN
GPG : 1D86 6D4A 49CE 4BBD 72CF FCF5 D856 6E11 F2A0 525E
Want to know more about Fedora?
Visit https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/
Ready to contribute? See https://whatcanidoforfedora.org/
想了解更多中文资讯,访问 https://zh.fedoracommunit
-ui.so.1.1.0
%{_libdir}/libqtermwidget5.so.1
%{_libdir}/libqtermwidget5.so.1.1.0
AFAIK only LXQt packages use these libraries so in theory this shouldn't
affect anything outside of the LXQt packages.
HTH.
--
Zamir SUN
Fedora user
GPG : 1D86 6D4A 49CE 4BBD 72CF FCF5 D856 6E11 F2A0
On 7/16/22 18:50, Zamir SUN wrote:
On 7/14/22 20:59, Jan Grulich wrote:
Hi,
I'm now working on Qt 5.15.5 update in Rawhide. As you probably know,
Qt 5.15 is the last major release of Qt 5 and all the development is
now focused to Qt 6. This means that all the upcoming releases of
/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it:
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
--
Zamir SUN
GPG : 1D86 6D4A 49CE 4BBD 72CF FCF5 D856 6E11 F2A0 525E
Want to know more about Fedora?
Visit
favor of UEFI. While systems already using Legacy BIOS to boot are
still supported, new legacy BIOS installations on these architectures
are no longer possible. Legacy BIOS support will be removed entirely
in a future Fedora.
(Additionally, the Hardware Overview page should be updated to mention
the U
Hi,
I need to update libtraceevent libtracefs kernelshark in order to fix
the FTBFS in F36 and F37. This will cause soname bumps for them. I
plan to do it tomorrow for both F36 and F37.
This affects trace-cmd which I am the packager. I thought this will
affect kernel-tools as well but dnf told m
On Tue, Jan 4, 2022 at 2:44 AM Ian McInerney via devel
wrote:
>>
>> Did you run the build for lxqt-wallet? I see that there is a commit in
>> distgit that bumps the version to 1.0.0, but I can't find an associated
>> build in Koji for that version. I actually think that commit to lxqt-wallet
>>
I hope I did not miss anything. IIRC there are no packages outside of
the LXQt SIG depends on those, but I'd like to still make people aware
of the change and possible other packages I missed.
I'll merge the side tag by the last day of the year.
HTH.
--
Zamir SUN
GPG : 1D86 6D4A 49CE
evel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply
//getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
--
Zamir SUN
GPG : 1D86 6D4A 49CE 4BBD 72CF FCF5 D856 6E11 F2A0 525E
Want to know more about
Ping for updates.
On 7/23/19 8:51 PM, Zamir SUN wrote:
> Ping for updates.
>
> I've build menu-cach 1.1.0 in Copr and already tested against LXQt.
>
> If you are not willing to grant me write permission, can you build this
> in EPEL directly?
>
> https://copr.fe
Ping for updates.
I've build menu-cach 1.1.0 in Copr and already tested against LXQt.
If you are not willing to grant me write permission, can you build this
in EPEL directly?
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/zsun/epel7/build/948489/
On 7/15/19 1:58 PM, Zamir SUN wrote:
>
Ping for updates.
I've build menu-cach 1.1.0 in Copr and already tested against LXQt.
If you are not willing to grant me write permission, can you build this
in EPEL directly?
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/zsun/epel7/build/948489/
On 7/15/19 1:58 PM, Zamir SUN wrote:
>
This sounds like 'You should stop using and contributing to Fedora for
x86_64' to me.
Technically, I don't have any concern.
Practically, as a user, I only have one machine that supports AVX2
which is my laptop.
As a packager, the main machines that I use for building and testing
my packages loca
devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives:
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.
On 1/4/19 3:00 PM, Zamir Sun wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 3, 2019 at 9:11 AM Chris Murphy wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Jan 2, 2019 at 2:22 PM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> On Wed, Dec 19, 2018 at 03:16:18PM -0500, Ben Cotton wrote:
>>>&g
On Thu, Jan 3, 2019 at 9:11 AM Chris Murphy wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jan 2, 2019 at 2:22 PM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
> wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Dec 19, 2018 at 03:16:18PM -0500, Ben Cotton wrote:
> > > == Benefit to Fedora ==
> > >
> > > Deepin Desktop Environment will make Fedora a more interesting f
On Thu, Aug 30, 2018 at 2:17 AM Adam Williamson
wrote:
>
> On Wed, 2018-08-29 at 13:41 +0100, Peter Robinson wrote:
> > On Wed, Aug 29, 2018 at 1:40 PM Zamir SUN wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I just wanna know if there will be one more compose
Hi,
I just wanna know if there will be one more compose for Fedora 29 for
Beta? To be clear, I've retired some packages in Fedora 29 before the
freeze which affect the LxQT appearance. But it did not take effect so I
filed a ticket for Release Engineering but it was handled yesterday. And
I did no
On 08/28/2018 06:03 AM, Till Maas wrote:
> Depending on: zopfli (22), status change: 2017-11-05 (42 weeks ago)
> fedora-logos (maintained by: alexl, caillon, caolanm, johnp, mbarnes,
> rhughes, rstrode, spot, ssp)
> fedora-logos-28.0.3-2.fc29.src requires zopfli = 1.0.1-7.fc2
g? After that I can start to commit the LxQT
changes.
>
> Greetings,
> Christian
>
>
> On 08/04/2018 05:58 PM, Zamir SUN wrote:
>> Hi Christian,
>>
>> As we talked on IRC yesterday, I build the LxQT 0.13.0 packages in my
>> copr[1].
>>
>> All
:02 AM, Zamir SUN wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Sorry for cross-posting.
>
> As I mentioned in this thread[1], I want to get libqtxdg updated in
> Fedora. However this will affect LxQT.
>
> $ sudo dnf repoquery --whatrequires libqtxdg
> Failed to synchronize cache for repo
Hi all,
Sorry for cross-posting.
As I mentioned in this thread[1], I want to get libqtxdg updated in
Fedora. However this will affect LxQT.
$ sudo dnf repoquery --whatrequires libqtxdg
Failed to synchronize cache for repo 'fzug-free', disabling.
Last metadata expiration check: 1:31:27 ago on Fri
Hi all,
I am writing to request for the update of libqtxdg.
The package libqtxdg is used by LxQT and DeepinDE. We are now updating
DeepinDE in rawhide which need the libqtxdg 3.0+.
As I see the bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1520064
hasn't been handled for over half a year. I'v
On 07/13/2018 02:33 AM, Kairui Song wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'm working on submitting a package, it's my first package. So I want to
> give a brief self-introduction here.
>
> My name is Kairui Song, I'm a software engineer at Red Hat, have been a
> Red Hat employee for two years, and start workin
On 04/13/2018 04:25 PM, Nicolas Chauvet wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I plan to update libupnp to 1.8.3 which comes with an ABI bump.
> The libthreadutil library is also dropped in this new release.
>
> I will rebuild the dependent applications
>
> f29 scratch build
> https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/ta
Hi,
Based on the claiming guideline[1], I am writing to claim the package
gcin. The package gcin was retired because previous maintainer cicku was
not responsive at that time[2]. Since I hear this package is still
useful for some users, I updated the spec file and filed a review
request here[3].
Hi Chenxiong,
> What's the fedpkg version are you using?
>
I was using fedpkg-1.28-1.fc26.noarch that day.
I try update and get 1.29-5.fc26 now. While I already executed on all
branches of portpub. So do I need to run fedpkg retire again with this
new version?
Thanks.
--
Ziqian SUN (Zamir)
GP
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/
Since pkgdb is retired already, I think might be the cause. But I still
want to know if I can ignore the error, or I am using the command in a
wrong way?
Thanks in advance.
--
Zamir SUN
Fedora user
GPG : 1D86 6D4A 49CE 4BBD 72CF FCF5 D856 6E11 F2A0 525E
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Hi allm
When I try to retire package using the following command, some error
shows up
`fedpkg retire "Renamed to popub"`
> $ fedpkg retire "Renamed to popub"
> /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/fedora/client/bodhi.py:48:
> DeprecationWarning: fedora.client.bodhi has been deprecated. Please use
>
On Mon, Aug 14, 2017 at 11:06 PM, Jaroslav Skarvada wrote:
> How to change upstream release monitoring, i.e. how to
> switch the states between disabled, monitoring, and
> monitoring with build? I didn't find anything related in [1],
> so I tried:
>
Does anyone know how can we do this? Recently I
Hi all,
Deepin Desktop Environment(Short as Deepin DE in following part) is the
Desktop shipped with Deepin.
Recently we want to pack Deepin DE into Fedora. We are working with one
of the Deepin developers on a Wiki Page[1] aiming at making this easier
for people who want to help and who can help
On 07/04/2017 12:59 AM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 03, 2017 at 10:11:33PM +0800, Zamir SUN wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> Recently I want to continue the package review request of cvechecker[1]
>> with mine since it has been quiet for a long time.
Hi all,
Recently I want to continue the package review request of cvechecker[1]
with mine since it has been quiet for a long time.
So I did commented in comment 7 this March. However, there is no update
till now. I dropped an email to packaging list[2] just now and Tomas
suggest me to ask for a r
Ah, sorry, just saw the reason budgie orphaned is that, the upstream is
deleted.
On 01/14/2017 08:29 PM, Zamir SUN wrote:
I'll take budgie.
On 01/13/2017 06:56 AM, opensou...@till.name wrote:
The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they
are orphaned for six weeks, u
I'll take budgie.
On 01/13/2017 06:56 AM, opensou...@till.name wrote:
The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they
are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure
that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper reason:
https://
Hi all,
I am Zamir SUN from China. I have been promoting Open Source for some
time and been an ambassador last year. Now I want to help some more bit
in Fedora.
Recently I find some bugs that can be fixed by fixing the spec. So I'd
like to help with the packager in my spare time.
Altho
45 matches
Mail list logo