Re: Fedora 31 System-Wide Change proposal: Switch RPMs to zstd compression

2019-05-31 Thread drago01
On Thursday, May 30, 2019, Samuel Sieb wrote: > On 5/30/19 1:56 PM, Chris Murphy wrote: > >> On Thu, May 30, 2019 at 8:40 AM Daniel Mach wrote: >> >>> >>> Dne 30. 05. 19 v 0:05 Neal Gompa napsal(a): >>> I'm pretty sure this would break DeltaRPMs, since none of the drpm software

Re: What does delaying F31 mean for packagers/users?

2018-11-27 Thread drago01
On Tuesday, November 27, 2018, Owen Taylor wrote: > On Tue, Nov 27, 2018 at 10:51 AM Stephen Gallagher > wrote: > > As came up in another part of the earlier thread, I think this is an > > opportunity for Modularity. For those things like GNOME that want to > > rev mid-release, if they shipped

Re: Proposal: delay F31 release to work out infrastructure and lifecycle challenges

2018-11-26 Thread drago01
On Monday, November 26, 2018, Matthew Miller wrote: > On Fri, Nov 16, 2018 at 09:50:33AM -0500, Paul Frields wrote: > > Here's the summary from the page, which proposes we pause the release > > after F30 for these efforts: > > I know it was a big time-off holiday week in the US, but I expected a

Re: Fedora Lifecycles: imagine longer-term possibilities

2018-11-14 Thread drago01
On Wednesday, November 14, 2018, Laura Abbott wrote: > On 11/14/18 5:29 AM, Matthew Miller wrote: > >> On Wed, Nov 14, 2018 at 12:32:14PM +0100, Adam Samalik wrote: >> >>> Do we have any user data about what "stability" means to users and on >>> what >>> different levels that can be achieved? Is

Re: Release criteria proposal: installing / removing software

2018-07-18 Thread drago01
On Wednesday, July 18, 2018, Chris Murphy wrote: > On Tue, Jul 17, 2018 at 3:53 PM, Adam Williamson > wrote: > > On Tue, 2018-07-17 at 14:48 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > >> I instinctively like the non-split form here because, to me, it > >> emphasizes more clearly that "appropriately"

Re: FESCo Elections - May 2018 : Results announcement

2018-06-14 Thread drago01
I simply forgot to vote this time - saw the announcement was busy with other things and then the elections where already over. Having a longer voting period would have helped but I am not sure if others simply missed it as well. ___ devel mailing list

Re: Firefox "Looking Glass" fiasco

2017-12-22 Thread drago01
On Friday, December 22, 2017, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Fri, 2017-12-22 at 07:01 -0500, Solomon Peachy wrote: > > > > Especially since Fedora's maintainers *already* compile it, including > > changing some of the defaults. What's a couple more? > > AIUI, Mozilla

Re: Important: NSS + Firefox + Thunderbird + Seamonkey + Icecat + Xulrunner

2017-01-24 Thread drago01
On Tue, Jan 24, 2017 at 7:44 PM, Roberto Ragusa wrote: > On 01/21/2017 04:15 PM, Kai Engert wrote: >> On Sat, 2017-01-21 at 15:47 +0100, Christian Dersch wrote: > >> The current Firefox 50.x will go unsupported on Tuesday, replaced by Firefox >> 51. >> Usually new

Re: Proposal: Rethink Fedora multilib support (Take Two!)

2017-01-06 Thread drago01
On Fri, Jan 6, 2017 at 2:24 PM, Stephen Gallagher <sgall...@redhat.com> wrote: > On 01/06/2017 08:07 AM, drago01 wrote: >> On Fri, Jan 6, 2017 at 1:58 PM, Stephen Gallagher <sgall...@redhat.com> >> wrote: >>> On 01/06/2017 01:08 AM, drago01 wrote: >&

Re: Proposal: Rethink Fedora multilib support (Take Two!)

2017-01-06 Thread drago01
On Fri, Jan 6, 2017 at 1:58 PM, Stephen Gallagher <sgall...@redhat.com> wrote: > On 01/06/2017 01:08 AM, drago01 wrote: >> >> Two suggestions were raised as alternatives to the container approach: >> >> * Switch to using the Debian style of multi-arch lay

Re: Proposal: Rethink Fedora multilib support (Take Two!)

2017-01-05 Thread drago01
On Thursday, January 5, 2017, Stephen Gallagher wrote: > On 01/05/2017 11:03 AM, Stephen Gallagher wrote: > > # Overview > > > > For many years, Fedora has supported multilib by carrying > parallel-installable > > libraries in /usr/lib[64]. This was necessary for a very long

Re: Proposal: Rethink Fedora multilib support

2017-01-05 Thread drago01
On Thursday, January 5, 2017, Stephen Gallagher wrote: > # Overview > > For many years, Fedora has supported multilib by carrying > parallel-installable > libraries in /usr/lib[64]. This was necessary for a very long time in > order to > support 32-bit applications running

Re: Two more concrete ideas for what a once-yearly+update schedule would look like

2016-12-09 Thread drago01
On Friday, December 9, 2016, Matthew Miller wrote: > On Fri, Dec 09, 2016 at 03:19:58PM -0500, langdon wrote: > > >Langdon is sitting right next to me right now and I'm going to tag him > > >in for more on Modularity. > [...] > > them. We can also decide when a

Re: Two more concrete ideas for what a once-yearly+update schedule would look like

2016-12-08 Thread drago01
On Thu, Dec 8, 2016 at 7:59 PM, Matthew Miller <mat...@fedoraproject.org> wrote: > On Thu, Dec 08, 2016 at 07:41:13PM +0100, drago01 wrote: >> Which problem are you trying to solve with those proposals? > > From my *other* other mail: > > * predictable calendar da

Re: Two more concrete ideas for what a once-yearly+update schedule would look like

2016-12-08 Thread drago01
On Thu, Dec 8, 2016 at 3:17 PM, Matthew Miller wrote: > Trying to make this idea a little more concrete. Here's two suggestions > for how it might work. These are strawman ideas -- please provide > alternates, poke holes, etc. And particularly from a QA and rel-eng >

Re: Nautilus usability

2016-11-27 Thread drago01
On Monday, November 28, 2016, Py wrote: > > > > >>> Have you ever made Nautilus copy/move a huge directory tree and then > >>> started a similar task for other directories while Nautilus was > >still > >>> working on the first task? > >> > >> A directory containing 10,000 1MiB

Re: Plans for Node.js 6.x

2016-05-01 Thread drago01
On Wed, Apr 27, 2016 at 4:00 AM, Stephen Gallagher wrote: > OK folks, it's Bad Decision Time. > > Today, Node.js 6.0 was released. This is a significant ABI-breaking release, > which means there is no guarantee that existing modules will work with it at > all.[1] > > Better

Re: Firefox not working anymore over ssh?

2016-04-04 Thread drago01
On Mon, Apr 4, 2016 at 9:33 PM, Eric Griffith wrote: > On Mon, Apr 4, 2016 at 3:13 PM, Michael Catanzaro > wrote: >> >> On Mon, 2016-04-04 at 14:19 -0400, Matthias Clasen wrote: >> > That seems to be a bit over-dramatic. gnome-initial-setup works

Re: Firefox not working anymore over ssh?

2016-04-03 Thread drago01
On Sat, Apr 2, 2016 at 11:28 PM, Kevin Fenzi <ke...@scrye.com> wrote: > On Sat, 2 Apr 2016 23:14:14 +0200 > drago01 <drag...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> No. This line does not tell you much. >> >> Easy way to check for DRi3 is to run "glxinfo|grep buffer_age&

Re: Firefox not working anymore over ssh?

2016-04-02 Thread drago01
On Sat, Apr 2, 2016 at 10:00 PM, Kevin Fenzi <ke...@scrye.com> wrote: > On Sat, 2 Apr 2016 09:20:00 +0200 > drago01 <drag...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> This is not true. While the plan is to get stop using device specific >> ddx drivers >> you do not nee

Re: Firefox not working anymore over ssh?

2016-04-02 Thread drago01
On Sat, Apr 2, 2016 at 10:04 AM, Jan Kratochvil <jan.kratoch...@redhat.com> wrote: > On Sat, 02 Apr 2016 09:39:33 +0200, drago01 wrote: >> On Sat, Apr 2, 2016 at 9:26 AM, Samuel Sieb <sam...@sieb.net> wrote: >> > On 04/02/2016 12:20 AM, drago01 wrote: >>

Re: Firefox not working anymore over ssh?

2016-04-02 Thread drago01
On Sat, Apr 2, 2016 at 9:26 AM, Samuel Sieb <sam...@sieb.net> wrote: > On 04/02/2016 12:20 AM, drago01 wrote: >> >> Its not broken with Firefox or LibreOffice ... it can by design not work >> remotely. This issue has been fixed in xserver git by transparently >>

Re: Firefox not working anymore over ssh?

2016-04-02 Thread drago01
On Sat, Apr 2, 2016 at 3:43 AM, Michael Catanzaro wrote: > On Fri, 2016-04-01 at 21:30 +0200, Jan Kratochvil wrote: >> On Tue, 29 Mar 2016 19:22:31 +0200, Tim Landscheidt wrote: >> > Michael Catanzaro wrote: >> > > Then it was probably broken by this

Re: 4.4 rebase coming to F23 soon

2016-02-24 Thread drago01
On Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 7:23 PM, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote: > > > On 02/24/2016 05:22 PM, Laura Abbott wrote: >> >> On 02/18/2016 05:51 PM, Laura Abbott wrote: >>> >>> Hi, >>> >>> 4.4.2 is currently building and should be in updates-testing soon. As >>> usual, >>> please

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Fedora support for Vulkan

2016-02-17 Thread drago01
On Wed, Feb 17, 2016 at 1:24 PM, Peter T. wrote: >> On Tue, 2016-02-16 at 11:34 -0800, Andrew Lutomirski wrote: >> >> >> DRI3 is a prerequisite, yes. The F23 builds of the intel driver had it >> disabled until fairly recently, but this update should sort you out: >> >>

Re: F24 System Wide Change: Change Proposal Name NewRpmDBFormat

2016-01-11 Thread drago01
On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 3:46 PM, Jan Kurik wrote: > = Proposed System Wide Change: Change Proposal Name NewRpmDBFormat = > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/NewRpmDBFormat > > Change owner(s): > * Florian Festi < ffesti AT redhat DOT com > > > > Change format of the RPM

Re: Specs using %define

2016-01-02 Thread drago01
> bless (drago01) > ghex (dodji, drago01, kalev) -> fixed in rawhide. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Requesting provenpackager intervention

2015-12-08 Thread drago01
On Tue, Dec 8, 2015 at 6:01 PM, Petr Stodulka wrote: > Hi folks, > > can any provenpackager change dependency in meld package for F22? There's > dependency on package > python-gobject (which doesn't exist) and there should be pygobject2 probably. > I already filled >

Re: RFC: switching from grubby to grub2-mkconfig

2015-12-06 Thread drago01
On Sun, Dec 6, 2015 at 6:20 PM, Andrew Lutomirski <l...@mit.edu> wrote: > On Sun, Dec 6, 2015 at 7:05 AM, drago01 <drag...@gmail.com> wrote: >> On Wed, Dec 2, 2015 at 4:30 AM, Andrew Lutomirski <l...@mit.edu> wrote: >>> Since the old proposal to have the bootloa

Re: RFC: switching from grubby to grub2-mkconfig

2015-12-06 Thread drago01
On Wed, Dec 2, 2015 at 4:30 AM, Andrew Lutomirski wrote: > Since the old proposal to have the bootloader automatically enumerate > boot options never went anywhere, can we do the next best thing? > > Specifically, these days grub2-mkconfig appears to produce output > that's

Re: RFC: switching from grubby to grub2-mkconfig

2015-12-06 Thread drago01
On Sun, Dec 6, 2015 at 7:02 PM, Tomasz Torcz <to...@pipebreaker.pl> wrote: > On Sun, Dec 06, 2015 at 06:25:09PM +0100, drago01 wrote: >> >> Well mkconfig can produce a configuration that does not actually work >> >> when grub2 itself gets updated (in which case

Re: wayland in rawhide

2015-11-25 Thread drago01
On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 9:17 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Fri, 2015-11-20 at 14:34 +, Ian Malone wrote: >> >> [1] Apparently middle mouse buttons are rare. I'm in an office > > This seems an odd assertion [...] Its not odd ... its plain wrong. -- devel mailing

Re: Retire a package from Fedora i686 (not x86_64)

2015-11-08 Thread drago01
On Sun, Nov 8, 2015 at 10:20 PM, Reindl Harald wrote: > > > Am 08.11.2015 um 22:17 schrieb Rex Dieter: >> >> Felix Miata wrote: >> >>> For those without >>> SSE2, Plasma 5 is completely unusable, but OK with any of the lightweigh >> >> >> . >> >> Qt5 (Gui and

Re: Retire a package from Fedora i686 (not x86_64)

2015-11-08 Thread drago01
On Sun, Nov 8, 2015 at 10:35 AM, Reindl Harald <h.rei...@thelounge.net> wrote: > > > Am 08.11.2015 um 09:47 schrieb drago01: >> >> On Sat, Nov 7, 2015 at 9:24 PM, Reindl Harald <h.rei...@thelounge.net> >> wrote: >>> >>> Am 07.11.2015 um

Re: Retire a package from Fedora i686 (not x86_64)

2015-11-08 Thread drago01
On Sat, Nov 7, 2015 at 9:24 PM, Reindl Harald <h.rei...@thelounge.net> wrote: > > > Am 07.11.2015 um 20:36 schrieb drago01: >> >> On Sat, Nov 7, 2015 at 7:40 PM, Reindl Harald <h.rei...@thelounge.net> >> wrote: >>> >>> the point is

Re: Retire a package from Fedora i686 (not x86_64)

2015-11-07 Thread drago01
On Sat, Nov 7, 2015 at 7:40 PM, Reindl Harald <h.rei...@thelounge.net> wrote: > > > Am 07.11.2015 um 19:27 schrieb drago01: >> >> On Sat, Nov 7, 2015 at 7:23 PM, Reindl Harald <h.rei...@thelounge.net> >> wrote: >>> >>> maybe you did

Re: Retire a package from Fedora i686 (not x86_64)

2015-11-07 Thread drago01
On Sat, Nov 7, 2015 at 7:23 PM, Reindl Harald wrote: > > > Am 07.11.2015 um 19:01 schrieb Kevin Kofler: >> >> Reindl Harald wrote: >>> >>> well, who's to say that we stay forever on a level of CPU >>> feature-support while there are instruction sets available for a whole

Re: make unmaintained ??

2015-10-26 Thread drago01
On Sun, Oct 25, 2015 at 8:24 PM, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > > On Oct 25, 2015 12:53, "Jan Kratochvil" wrote: >> >> On Sun, 25 Oct 2015 01:07:47 +0200, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: >> > I built 4.1 for rawhide. If that checks out to be OK, I

Re: Packaging of PlayOnLinux

2015-10-14 Thread drago01
On Wed, Oct 14, 2015 at 5:46 PM, Bastien Nocera wrote: > > > - Original Message - >> Dne 14.10.2015 v 16:50 Bastien Nocera napsal(a): >> > If the application cannot work without downloading anything, or being >> > supplied >> > third-party (sometimes proprietary)

Re: Summary/Minutes from today's FESCo Meeting (2015-10-07)

2015-10-12 Thread drago01
On Mon, Oct 12, 2015 at 6:47 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote: > Bastien Nocera wrote: >> 2 distributions add slightly different versions of the same functionality >> -> incompatible > > I said that carrying more feature patches makes it "more likely" that > packages from other

Re: F23 -> Rawhide upgrade fails to start GDM

2015-09-29 Thread drago01
On Mon, Sep 28, 2015 at 11:29 PM, Richard Bradfield <bradf...@fstab.me> wrote: > > > On Mon, 28 Sep 2015, at 17:11, drago01 wrote: >> On Mon, Sep 28, 2015 at 5:38 PM, Kevin Fenzi <ke...@scrye.com> wrote: >> > On Mon, 28 Sep 2015 08:37:58 +0100 >> >

Re: llvm 3.7 for rawhide and then f23

2015-09-24 Thread drago01
On Thu, Sep 24, 2015 at 6:04 PM, Dave Johansen wrote: > On Mon, Sep 21, 2015 at 6:27 AM, Adam Jackson wrote: >> >> On Sun, 2015-09-20 at 21:00 +0800, Christopher Meng wrote: >> > On 9/20/15, David Airlie wrote: >> > > It's llvm, there

Re: Fedora 23 cloud image (and, for that matter, minimal anything) bloat

2015-09-22 Thread drago01
On Tue, Sep 22, 2015 at 11:07 AM, Matej Stuchlik wrote: > [...] > When it comes to python3, one way to shave off ~9MiB from python3-libs, and > possibly quite a bit more overall, would be to not install both optimized and > unoptimized bytecode, as we do now, but just the

Re: Disable PulseAudio flat volumes to prevent it from pushing volume level to max

2015-09-22 Thread drago01
On Tue, Sep 22, 2015 at 12:00 AM, Owen Taylor wrote: > On Thu, 2015-09-17 at 23:26 +0200, Germano Massullo wrote: >> Il 17/09/2015 21:13, Andrew Lutomirski ha scritto: >> > >> > To clarify: did you get blasted by music or by video conference >> > sounds? If the music volume

Re: /var/log/dnf.log

2015-09-10 Thread drago01
On Thu, Sep 10, 2015 at 5:46 PM, Reindl Harald wrote: > > Am 10.09.2015 um 17:38 schrieb David Sommerseth: >> >> On 10/09/15 15:31, Reindl Harald wrote: >>> >>> what in the world is that garbage instead a clear and simple log as >>> /var/log/yum.log just listing installed,

Re: Firefox addon signing

2015-08-26 Thread drago01
On Wed, Aug 26, 2015 at 3:13 PM, Richard Z r...@linux-m68k.org wrote: On Wed, Aug 26, 2015 at 03:12:25PM +0300, Alexander Ploumistos wrote: Their FAQ is constantly updated: https://wiki.mozilla.org/Addons/Extension_Signing#FAQ I'm not sure if there is a valid practical reason to refuse

Re: Firefox testing - offscreen surfaces and OMTC

2015-08-24 Thread drago01
On Mon, Aug 24, 2015 at 8:54 AM, Martin Stransky stran...@redhat.com wrote: On 08/21/2015 08:28 PM, Thomas Daede wrote: I've been running nightly with this enabled for quite a while on Intel and it's been fine. Note that OMTC is required for e10s. If you mean OMTC by this then you're

Re: Firefox testing - offscreen surfaces and OMTC

2015-08-24 Thread drago01
On Mon, Aug 24, 2015 at 10:18 AM, Martin Stransky stran...@redhat.com wrote: On 08/24/2015 09:43 AM, drago01 wrote: On Mon, Aug 24, 2015 at 8:54 AM, Martin Stransky stran...@redhat.com wrote: On 08/21/2015 08:28 PM, Thomas Daede wrote: I've been running nightly with this enabled for quite

Re: Firefox testing - offscreen surfaces and OMTC

2015-08-21 Thread drago01
On Fri, Aug 21, 2015 at 10:33 AM, Martin Stransky stran...@redhat.com wrote: Folks, I'd use some testing for new Firefox feature - offscreen surfaces [1]. It may also fix crashes when OMTC is enabled [2]. Browser should be a bit faster with those features on. How to test? - Install

Re: Same comand names in /usr/bin and /usr/sbin

2015-08-16 Thread drago01
On Sun, Aug 16, 2015 at 6:32 PM, Matthew Miller mat...@fedoraproject.org wrote: On Sun, Aug 16, 2015 at 02:03:38PM +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote: In general: encoding privilige policy into the API through binary paths is a really bad idea, as policy shouldn't be considered strict API (or to

Re: noarch vs. all, x86_64 vs. amd64, kernel vs. linux and PAE

2015-08-14 Thread drago01
On Fri, Aug 14, 2015 at 2:38 PM, Wei-Lun Chao blue...@member.fsf.org wrote: Hi, Is there already any discussion about: rename arch name noarch to all rename arch name x86_64 to amd64 rename package name kernel-PAE to kernel and even rename package name kernel to linux Why? That doesn't

Re: Non responsive maintainer: Jaromír Cápík

2015-07-04 Thread drago01
On Fri, Jul 3, 2015 at 10:22 PM, Luya Tshimbalanga l...@fedoraproject.org wrote: Upstream version of phatch is available and also a patch provided on https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1192867 but the assignee is unresponsive. The patch has been attached less than a week ago ... --

Re: dnssec-trigger + GNOME + NetworkManager integration

2015-07-02 Thread drago01
On Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 2:33 AM, Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net wrote: Am 02.07.2015 um 02:30 schrieb Michael Catanzaro: On Wed, 2015-07-01 at 19:59 -0400, Paul Wouters wrote: Principles are good and well. But how many times did you actually USE that option you so reluctantly

Re: FESCO Elections - June 2015 - Results

2015-06-29 Thread drago01
On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 2:47 PM, Tom Hughes t...@compton.nu wrote: On 29/06/15 12:00, Josh Boyer wrote: On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 3:50 AM, Jan Kurik jku...@redhat.com wrote: Greetings, all! The elections for FESCo - June 2015 have concluded, and the results are shown below. FESCo is

Re: fedup for F23 and beyond

2015-06-07 Thread drago01
On Sun, Jun 7, 2015 at 1:41 PM, Neal Gompa ngomp...@gmail.com wrote: Uhh, this might be a stupid question, but what actually prevents us from integrating the FedUp process into install media (that is, not live images)? I mean, yeah, it's nice that we can do upgrades online, but what about when

Re: virt-manager - libappindicator-gtk3 - remmina

2015-06-04 Thread drago01
On Thu, Jun 4, 2015 at 4:45 PM, Michael Catanzaro mcatanz...@gnome.org wrote: On Thu, 2015-06-04 at 03:24 +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote: libappindicator is now (since Fedora 22) also REQUIRED for GTK+ system tray applets to work under KDE Plasma. (Plasma 5 no longer supports the legacy

Re: F23 System Wide Change: Default Local DNS Resolver

2015-06-01 Thread drago01
On Mon, Jun 1, 2015 at 9:28 PM, Andrew Lutomirski l...@mit.edu wrote: On Mon, Jun 1, 2015 at 12:25 PM, Ryan S. Brown rya...@redhat.com wrote: On 06/01/2015 01:55 PM, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote: RSB == Ryan S Brown rya...@redhat.com writes: RSB I disagree; for server cloud deployments it

Re: Intel driver pain

2015-05-29 Thread drago01
On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 12:13 PM, Sergio Belkin seb...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, Could you tell me if anyone else is having this kind of issues: [vie may 29 07:01:22 2015] [drm] Initialized drm 1.1.0 20060810 [vie may 29 07:01:22 2015] [drm] Memory usable by graphics device = 2048M [vie may 29

Re: Secure boot and packaging third-party kernel modules

2015-05-29 Thread drago01
On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 5:57 PM, Sérgio Basto ser...@serjux.com wrote: On Sex, 2015-05-29 at 09:28 -0400, Josh Boyer wrote: On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 9:19 AM, Sérgio Basto ser...@serjux.com wrote: On Sex, 2015-05-29 at 08:54 -0400, Josh Boyer wrote: On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 8:40 AM, David

Re: libvpx got soname bump and no one noticed?

2015-05-28 Thread drago01
On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 9:16 AM, Marcin Juszkiewicz mjuszkiew...@redhat.com wrote: W dniu 28.05.2015 o 07:28, Robin Lee pisze: Sorry guys, my fault. (insert local idiom about elephant in a store here). Sorted out with help of spot and kalev. You should update rpmfusion-free-relase. And run

Re: New content (Was: Re: Reminder: Fedora 20 end of life on 2015-06-23)

2015-05-27 Thread drago01
On Wed, May 27, 2015 at 9:51 PM, Antti Järvinen antti.jarvi...@katiska.org wrote: Matthew Miller writes: So, here's a question With F21 released December 9, but F23 scheduled for October*, if we go with the normal one month overlap, that means the total F21 livespan will be only 11

Re: updating f22 llvm to 3.5.2 release?

2015-05-20 Thread drago01
On Wed, May 20, 2015 at 11:50 AM, Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com wrote: Hi, I opened https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1221923 about this too but thought it would be good to ask here. F22 currently has llvm-3.5.0 (F23 is now on 3.6.0): I believe there is a newer 3.5.2 bugfix

Re: Rapid release for security updates

2015-05-19 Thread drago01
On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 10:38 AM, Martin Stransky stran...@redhat.com wrote: Hi guys, is there any mechanism how to speed up release of critical security fixes by Fedora update system? For instance Firefox packages are released *week* after official Mozilla release which is really bad.

Re: Fedora on Android

2015-05-14 Thread drago01
On Thu, May 14, 2015 at 5:27 AM, Adam Williamson adamw...@fedoraproject.org wrote: On Wed, 2015-05-13 at 17:03 -0700, Les Howell wrote: Hi, guys, I created a new UI for GRBL using Python with tkinter. Not bad, but it won't work on an Android Notepad (GX10 from a company called EKEN),

Re: PHP crashes on F21 with roundcube

2015-04-27 Thread drago01
On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 11:12 AM, Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net wrote: am i the only one facing reproduceable crashes of apache worker process each time a roundcube 1.0.5 page is loaded? all relevant packages (apache, php..) here are built from identical srpms andthe only difference is

Re: PHP crashes on F21 with roundcube

2015-04-27 Thread drago01
On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 1:01 PM, Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net wrote: Am 27.04.2015 um 12:49 schrieb drago01: On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 11:12 AM, Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net wrote: am i the only one facing reproduceable crashes of apache worker process each time a roundcube

Re: dnf caches

2015-04-23 Thread drago01
On Thu, Apr 23, 2015 at 7:07 PM, Pádraig Brady p...@draigbrady.com wrote: My Fedora 22 system prompted me that there was a new coreutils package for update. Rather than clicking restart and install in the GUI I tried to: # dnf install coreutils Using metadata from Tue Apr 21 19:54:02

Re: hibernation support - lack of distro-wide coordination between systemd, dracut, anaconda, pm-utils and maybe more?

2015-04-16 Thread drago01
On Thu, Apr 16, 2015 at 2:31 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek zbys...@in.waw.pl wrote: On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 08:55:06AM -0700, Andrew Lutomirski wrote: - pm-utils DONE retired in master Is that good enough? Should systemd obsolete it, too? I thought the whole point of this thread was

Re: dnf replacing yum and dnf-yum

2015-04-08 Thread drago01
On Wed, Apr 8, 2015 at 12:11 PM, Tim Lauridsen tim.laurid...@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, 8 Apr 2015 at 11:05 drago01 drag...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, Apr 7, 2015 at 6:37 PM, Adam Williamson adamw...@fedoraproject.org wrote: On Tue, 2015-04-07 at 18:33 +0200, drago01 wrote: On Tue, Apr 7

Re: dnf replacing yum and dnf-yum

2015-04-07 Thread drago01
On Tue, Apr 7, 2015 at 6:00 PM, Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net wrote: Am 07.04.2015 um 17:53 schrieb Ralf Corsepius: On 04/07/2015 05:07 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: dnf's default behavior is like yum with --skip-broken already. WHAT? --skip-broken is a band-aid to work around

Re: hibernation support - lack of distro-wide coordination between systemd, dracut, anaconda, pm-utils and maybe more?

2015-03-30 Thread drago01
On Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 11:24 AM, Kalev Lember kalevlem...@gmail.com wrote: On 03/30/2015 11:08 AM, Richard Hughes wrote: On 30 March 2015 at 07:57, Till Maas opensou...@till.name wrote: - provides hibernation support via systemctl hibernate, which is also what pm-hibernate does (why

Re: Why does disk I/O slow down a CPU bound task?

2015-03-30 Thread drago01
On Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 9:58 PM, Dave Johansen davejohan...@gmail.com wrote: I noticed on RHEL 6 that when a large amount of disk I/O is happening that CPU bound tasks slow down. I have been able to reproduce it in Fedora 21 as well and here are the instructions of how I can reproduce it with a

Re: What happened to xorg-x11-drv-amd?

2015-03-28 Thread drago01
On Fri, Mar 27, 2015 at 11:21 PM, Luya Tshimbalanga l...@fedoraproject.org wrote: On 27/03/15 03:02 PM, drago01 wrote: On Fri, Mar 27, 2015 at 11:00 PM, Luya Tshimbalanga l...@fedoraproject.org wrote: I recently bought an Asus X550Z which comes with a Quad-Core A10 and Dual graphic radeon. I

Re: What happened to xorg-x11-drv-amd?

2015-03-28 Thread drago01
On Sat, Mar 28, 2015 at 12:51 PM, drago01 drag...@gmail.com wrote: On Fri, Mar 27, 2015 at 11:21 PM, Luya Tshimbalanga l...@fedoraproject.org wrote: On 27/03/15 03:02 PM, drago01 wrote: On Fri, Mar 27, 2015 at 11:00 PM, Luya Tshimbalanga l...@fedoraproject.org wrote: I recently bought

Re: Texlive packaging

2015-03-27 Thread drago01
On Fri, Mar 27, 2015 at 6:46 PM, Matthew Miller mat...@fedoraproject.org wrote: On Fri, Mar 27, 2015 at 12:34:58PM -0500, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote: Personally I preferred the thousand package review scenario, but that never happened. Having a small number of subpackages, however, was never

Re: What happened to xorg-x11-drv-amd?

2015-03-27 Thread drago01
On Fri, Mar 27, 2015 at 11:00 PM, Luya Tshimbalanga l...@fedoraproject.org wrote: I recently bought an Asus X550Z which comes with a Quad-Core A10 and Dual graphic radeon. I am surprised to find out xorg-x11-drv-amd is missing in the repository. Can anyone explain what is going on? That driver

Re: /boot on Btrfs still not supported, main problem is anaconda and grubby

2015-03-20 Thread drago01
On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 6:22 PM, Chris Murphy li...@colorremedies.com wrote: On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 7:20 AM, Josef Bacik jo...@toxicpanda.com wrote: Cool so then we use grubby for these other cases and use the grub2 stuff for the grub2 case which covers the majority of installs and lets us

Re: /boot on Btrfs still not supported, main problem is anaconda and grubby

2015-03-20 Thread drago01
On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 9:18 PM, Chris Murphy li...@colorremedies.com wrote: On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 1:51 PM, drago01 drag...@gmail.com wrote: On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 8:36 PM, Chris Murphy li...@colorremedies.com wrote: On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 11:58 AM, drago01 drag...@gmail.com wrote

Re: /boot on Btrfs still not supported, main problem is anaconda and grubby

2015-03-20 Thread drago01
On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 8:36 PM, Chris Murphy li...@colorremedies.com wrote: On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 11:58 AM, drago01 drag...@gmail.com wrote: That is not the only issue. If grub itself gets updated and you run grub2-mkconfig the generated config file might cause issues with the grub

Re: Why -mtune=atom?

2015-03-12 Thread drago01
On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 2:02 PM, Florian Weimer fwei...@redhat.com wrote: The default CFLAGS set by RPM include “-mtune-atom”. Why? I doubt Atom CPUs are Fedora's primary target. It's not even a documented GCC option. There is such a wide variety of CPUs under this label that it's not even

Re: F22: gnomekeyring no longer remembering unlocked ssh keys?

2015-03-10 Thread drago01
On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 11:12 AM, Hans de Goede hdego...@redhat.com wrote: Hi All, I've setup things so that the first time I want to unlock an ssh keys I need to explicitly type the unlock password (I do not want this to get remembered and the keys to automatically get unlocked the moment

Re: Libinput now enabled as default xorg driver for F-22 workstation installs

2015-03-02 Thread drago01
On Mon, Mar 2, 2015 at 1:32 AM, Peter Hutterer peter.hutte...@who-t.net wrote: On Thu, Feb 26, 2015 at 09:49:48AM +0100, Hans de Goede wrote: Hi, On 24-02-15 18:34, drago01 wrote: On Mon, Feb 23, 2015 at 1:32 PM, Hans de Goede hdego...@redhat.com wrote: Hi All, As described here: https

Re: i686 kernel bug priority plan

2015-02-26 Thread drago01
On Thu, Feb 26, 2015 at 11:38 AM, Jared K. Smith jsm...@fedoraproject.org wrote: On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 8:50 AM, Stephen Gallagher sgall...@redhat.com wrote: we should strongly consider demoting i686 to secondary architecture for installation media at the Fedora 23 branch point (about six

Re: i686 kernel bug priority plan

2015-02-25 Thread drago01
On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 2:15 PM, Josh Boyer jwbo...@fedoraproject.org wrote: Hello Fellow Contributors! [...] It's possible down the road that, if there is no community interest in i686, the project might look at other options such as making i686 a secondary architecture. This is not because

Re: Libinput now enabled as default xorg driver for F-22 workstation installs

2015-02-24 Thread drago01
On Mon, Feb 23, 2015 at 1:32 PM, Hans de Goede hdego...@redhat.com wrote: Hi All, As described here: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/LibinputForXorg We've been working on making xorg-x11-drv-libinput the default input driver for the Xorg xserver under Fedora 22. All the necessary

Re: systemd-219 issues with 22 and Rawhide composes

2015-02-23 Thread drago01
On Mon, Feb 23, 2015 at 2:17 PM, David Cantrell dcantr...@redhat.com wrote: That is, and I am trying to be specific here, changes that impact other components in the distribution need to be coordinated in Fedora among the affected components. Almost every change might affect other components

Re: Changes in the f22 workstation

2015-02-21 Thread drago01
On Sat, Feb 21, 2015 at 1:00 AM, Pete Travis li...@petetravis.com wrote: On Feb 20, 2015 2:09 PM, Matthias Clasen mcla...@redhat.com wrote: I wanted to give a heads-up to the wider audience about a number of workstation changes that are landing in the f22 branch (and rawhide) this week, in

Re: Which of the changes introduced in F21 might affect bash history?

2015-02-16 Thread drago01
On Mon, Feb 16, 2015 at 9:34 AM, Alexander Ploumistos alex.ploumis...@gmail.com wrote: Hello, I have upgraded 3 systems to a nonproduct F21 and I have installed F21 to a couple of others using the x86_64 Live Workstation image. They all suffer from intermittent losses of bash history. When

Re: [Proposal] Ring-based Packaging Policies

2015-02-15 Thread drago01
On Thu, Feb 12, 2015 at 7:32 PM, Stephen Gallagher sgall...@redhat.com wrote: (Logistical note: please keep all replies to this thread on devel@lists.fedoraproject.org) [...] === Core Packages === Any package that is provided on a release-blocking medium (which at present includes Fedora

Re: MongoDB Security Defaults

2015-02-13 Thread drago01
On Fri, Feb 13, 2015 at 11:37 PM, Ryan S. Brown rya...@redhat.com wrote: On 02/13/2015 11:25 AM, Frank Ch. Eigler wrote: Ryan S. Brown rya...@redhat.com writes: [...] In January, the Fedora rawhide package for mongo[2] was changed to listen on all interfaces by default [...] To help

Re: Firefox addon signing

2015-02-12 Thread drago01
On Thu, Feb 12, 2015 at 11:15 AM, Nikos Roussos comzer...@fedoraproject.org wrote: On Thu, Feb 12, 2015 at 6:30 AM, Michael Cronenworth m...@cchtml.com wrote: I'm sure those that need to know, know, but for those that haven't heard[1] Mozilla's official Firefox build will enforce addons to

Re: Firefox addon signing

2015-02-12 Thread drago01
On Thu, Feb 12, 2015 at 1:53 PM, Daniel P. Berrange berra...@redhat.com wrote: On Thu, Feb 12, 2015 at 12:47:27PM +0100, drago01 wrote: On Thu, Feb 12, 2015 at 11:15 AM, Nikos Roussos comzer...@fedoraproject.org wrote: On Thu, Feb 12, 2015 at 6:30 AM, Michael Cronenworth m...@cchtml.com

Re: Flash plugin 0-day vulnerability in the wild

2015-01-26 Thread drago01
On Mon, Jan 26, 2015 at 2:01 PM, Ahmad Samir ahmadsamir3...@gmail.com wrote: On 26 January 2015 at 14:55, Martin Stransky stran...@redhat.com wrote: Where have you got that? Official Adobe site [1] says the latest is 11.2.202.438 and flash download page [2] gives me the same. I see the Ubuntu

Re: Flash plugin 0-day vulnerability in the wild

2015-01-26 Thread drago01
This vulnerability has got CVE-2015-0311 name [1]. Thx to drago01 to point that out. Unfortunately it's still unfixed by Adobe and latest flash for Linux/Firefox (11.2.202.438) is still vulnerable. The latest one is 11.2.202.440 ... which is supposed to have the fix. -- devel mailing list devel

Re: Flash plugin 0-day vulnerability in the wild

2015-01-26 Thread drago01
On Mon, Jan 26, 2015 at 12:58 PM, poma pomidorabelis...@gmail.com wrote: On 26.01.2015 12:42, Ralf Corsepius wrote: On 01/26/2015 12:29 PM, poma wrote: On 23.01.2015 10:51, Martin Stransky wrote: Folk, There's a live 0-day flash vulnerability which is not fixed yet [1][2]. If you use flash

Re: Flash plugin 0-day vulnerability in the wild

2015-01-23 Thread drago01
On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 4:29 PM, Daniel J Walsh dwa...@redhat.com wrote: On 01/23/2015 10:25 AM, poma wrote: On 23.01.2015 15:12, Kevin Fenzi wrote: On Fri, 23 Jan 2015 12:44:23 +0100 poma pomidorabelis...@gmail.com wrote: On 23.01.2015 10:51, Martin Stransky wrote: Folk, There's a live

Re: F22 System Wide Change: GNOME 3.16

2015-01-22 Thread drago01
On Thu, Jan 22, 2015 at 6:05 PM, Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net wrote: Am 22.01.2015 um 17:59 schrieb drago01: On Thu, Jan 22, 2015 at 1:11 AM, Reindl Harald wrote: Am 21.01.2015 um 23:55 schrieb Yanko Kaneti: When did Fedora become the place which only welcomes mature software

Re: F22 System Wide Change: GNOME 3.16

2015-01-22 Thread drago01
On Thu, Jan 22, 2015 at 1:11 AM, Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net wrote: Am 21.01.2015 um 23:55 schrieb Yanko Kaneti: On Wed, 2015-01-21 at 12:26 -0600, Michael Catanzaro wrote: On Wed, Jan 21, 2015 at 8:38 AM, Igor Gnatenko i.gnatenko.br...@gmail.com wrote: + gnome-calendar btw

Re: F22 System Wide Change: Enable Polyinstantiated /tmp and /var/tmp directories by default

2015-01-21 Thread drago01
On Wed, Jan 21, 2015 at 4:59 PM, Lennart Poettering mzerq...@0pointer.de wrote: On Wed, 21.01.15 09:49, Daniel J Walsh (dwa...@redhat.com) wrote: * Other developers: ** Add /tmp-inst and /var/tmp/tmp-inst to filesystem. (packagename: filesystem) ** Enable namespaces in

Re: DNF as default package manager

2015-01-21 Thread drago01
On Wed, Jan 21, 2015 at 12:13 PM, Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com wrote: But I'm really interested in state of DNF as default too. Should I switch mock to use DNF as default? For me there is still lot of unfinished tasks. E.g. documenting what --installroot should actually do [BZ

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >