On 6/1/2010 5:45 AM, Lennart Poettering wrote:
Guys, nobody wants to take away configuration options. You can edit the
.service files too, and readjust things. You can even plug in shell
scripts here and there and wherever it suits you.
There are not plans to make configuration of systemd
On 5/31/2010 5:08 PM, Casimiro de Almeida Barreto wrote:
Em 31-05-2010 09:33, Andrew Overholt escreveu:
Hi Casimiro,
I've got the following problem with eclipse after update to F13: upon launch it
freezes at initial banner uses about 80% of CPU time.
Please file a bug at
On 5/4/2010 12:57 AM, Jesse Keating wrote:
Testing takes time, lets give up? Seriously? Pushes happen about once
every 24 hours, do you really say it'll take longer than 24 hours to get
a couple people to test the issue and confirm that your fix does indeed
fix the issue, and doesn't seem to
On 4/25/2010 8:37 PM, Matthias Clasen wrote:
On Sun, 2010-04-25 at 10:08 -0500, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
I don't see how using Mozilla trademarks provides significant benefit
to Fedora. It seems to mostly benefit Mozilla. I don't see why we should
be breaking our rules to help them.
On 3/18/2010 9:47 PM, Robert Nichols wrote:
The default pseudo-geometry will still be 63 sectors/track unless you
change it, and by default a partition's start-of-data is forced to the
beginning of a track. Making the sectors larger doesn't change that.
Warning: this question is asked
On 3/6/2010 9:04 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
I thought to myself yesterday, 'what this long and fractious thread
about update policy *really* needs is some unscientific and
controversial numbers'. =) So, I ran a forum poll! Everyone loves those,
right?
What do people make of this?
I
On 3/4/2010 5:04 PM, Josh Boyer wrote:
On Thu, Mar 04, 2010 at 08:54:28AM -0600, Jon Ciesla wrote:
M A Young wrote:
I don't know if this has already been raised but I notice on the
package-annou...@lists.fedoraproject.org list that several Fedora 13
packages keep getting
On 3/1/2010 10:44 AM, Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
One problem of updates-testing is - it takes so much time to be pushed and
then mirrored. More rawhide approach should be used here. Users who are really
interested in testing usually downloads from Koji directly.
It is not so simple. When I am
On 1/29/2010 4:50 AM, Tom spot Callaway wrote:
On 01/28/2010 09:32 PM, Eric Smith wrote:
What is considered the best practice for packaging a program that uses
strlcpy()?
Besides patching it to not use strlcpy? :)
Is there a reason (from a programming point of view) to avoid
