Re: [rawhide] ICU upgrade to 71.1
On Fri, Aug 05, 2022 at 07:17:03PM +0200, Dan Horák wrote: > > I see 20-30% of steal time in the VM building webkit, which should mean > the hypervisor's capacity is at/over limit :-( It would benefit from > having more physical CPUs. In the past, steal time has been caused by other lpars needing resources I think. At least in the runup to RHEL9, the steal % was very high and I was told it was due to other lpars doing QE work on rhel9. I do see about 18-22% stolen time on the hypervisor, and there's some cpus showing 100% idle. ;( I can try asking for more cpus, but unlikely to happen immediately. kevin signature.asc Description: PGP signature ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: [rawhide] ICU upgrade to 71.1
On Fri, 5 Aug 2022 09:57:58 -0700 Kevin Fenzi wrote: > On Fri, Aug 05, 2022 at 05:30:14PM +0200, Dan Horák wrote: > > On Thu, 4 Aug 2022 16:55:15 +0200 > > Dan Horák wrote: > > > > > On Thu, 4 Aug 2022 23:46:44 +0900 > > > Mamoru TASAKA wrote: > > > > > > > Frantisek Zatloukal wrote on 2022/08/02 23:17: > > > > > Hmm, > > > > > > > > > > I am really sorry for this, I'd messed up a lot somehow. > > > > > > > > > > I'll take a deeper look tomorrow morning, but from a quick look: > > > > > - webkit is now being built against the new icu, passed on i686 of> > > > > > architectures, it'll hopefully be done before the next compose. > > > > > > > > So looks like the rebuild of webkit2gtk3 won't finish on s390x - > > > > even after 51 hours: > > > > > > > > https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=90394095 > > > > > > > > The above link says there are multiple buildroots. What does it mean? > > > > s390x build is killed and repeated due to some specific issue on > > > > s390x server? > > > > > > usually the build killed and restarted due OOM, but this is weird as > > > Michael's previous build finished in ~6 hours > > > > I have moved the task to another builder and it is finishing right now. > > > > Kevin, seems the z/VM builders are now more performant than the KVM > > ones ... > > I do not think thats the case. The build you moved OOMed again after > that I am pretty sure. yeah, I suspect you are right :-( although I think it got faster to the OOM :-) > So, I have rebalanced the kvm ones. > > before: > > 25 builders, 2 cpus and 13GB memory > > after: > > 20 builders, 3 cpus and 17GB memory. > > Hopefully that will make these larger builds more happy. > If not, we can adjust more. I see 20-30% of steal time in the VM building webkit, which should mean the hypervisor's capacity is at/over limit :-( It would benefit from having more physical CPUs. Dan ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: [rawhide] ICU upgrade to 71.1
On Fri, Aug 05, 2022 at 05:30:14PM +0200, Dan Horák wrote: > On Thu, 4 Aug 2022 16:55:15 +0200 > Dan Horák wrote: > > > On Thu, 4 Aug 2022 23:46:44 +0900 > > Mamoru TASAKA wrote: > > > > > Frantisek Zatloukal wrote on 2022/08/02 23:17: > > > > Hmm, > > > > > > > > I am really sorry for this, I'd messed up a lot somehow. > > > > > > > > I'll take a deeper look tomorrow morning, but from a quick look: > > > > - webkit is now being built against the new icu, passed on i686 of> > > > > architectures, it'll hopefully be done before the next compose. > > > > > > So looks like the rebuild of webkit2gtk3 won't finish on s390x - > > > even after 51 hours: > > > > > > https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=90394095 > > > > > > The above link says there are multiple buildroots. What does it mean? > > > s390x build is killed and repeated due to some specific issue on > > > s390x server? > > > > usually the build killed and restarted due OOM, but this is weird as > > Michael's previous build finished in ~6 hours > > I have moved the task to another builder and it is finishing right now. > > Kevin, seems the z/VM builders are now more performant than the KVM > ones ... I do not think thats the case. The build you moved OOMed again after that I am pretty sure. So, I have rebalanced the kvm ones. before: 25 builders, 2 cpus and 13GB memory after: 20 builders, 3 cpus and 17GB memory. Hopefully that will make these larger builds more happy. If not, we can adjust more. kevin signature.asc Description: PGP signature ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: [rawhide] ICU upgrade to 71.1
On Thu, 4 Aug 2022 16:55:15 +0200 Dan Horák wrote: > On Thu, 4 Aug 2022 23:46:44 +0900 > Mamoru TASAKA wrote: > > > Frantisek Zatloukal wrote on 2022/08/02 23:17: > > > Hmm, > > > > > > I am really sorry for this, I'd messed up a lot somehow. > > > > > > I'll take a deeper look tomorrow morning, but from a quick look: > > > - webkit is now being built against the new icu, passed on i686 of> > > > architectures, it'll hopefully be done before the next compose. > > > > So looks like the rebuild of webkit2gtk3 won't finish on s390x - > > even after 51 hours: > > > > https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=90394095 > > > > The above link says there are multiple buildroots. What does it mean? > > s390x build is killed and repeated due to some specific issue on > > s390x server? > > usually the build killed and restarted due OOM, but this is weird as > Michael's previous build finished in ~6 hours I have moved the task to another builder and it is finishing right now. Kevin, seems the z/VM builders are now more performant than the KVM ones ... Dan ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: [rawhide] ICU upgrade to 71.1
WebKitGTK builds have been unreliable for the past few weeks. There is an infrastructure ticket for this here: https://pagure.io/releng/issue/10909 I think processing debuginfo requires somewhere between 12-13 GB of RAM, so the s390x builders are likely right on the threshold where it will sometimes succeed and sometimes not. You can see the build has been running for 52 hours, but the task is only 6h30m as I write this. That's consistent with OOM. My guess is it builds WebKit almost successfully, then dies processing debuginfo, then starts building again, and just loops, wasting resources on the builder. There is a related infrastructure ticket: https://pagure.io/releng/issue/10910 Please note I am intend to retire the webkit2gtk3 package ASAP. In F37, it will be obsoleted by a new webkitgtk source package, which builds WebKitGTK three times. Of course that means the build time will triple, but it will be easier to maintain than three different source packages. A scratch build with all three builds enabled was actually successful. For now, we're waiting to recover the package name: https://pagure.io/releng/issue/10919 Michael ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: [rawhide] ICU upgrade to 71.1
On Thu, 4 Aug 2022 at 10:56, Dan Horák wrote: > On Thu, 4 Aug 2022 23:46:44 +0900 > Mamoru TASAKA wrote: > > > Frantisek Zatloukal wrote on 2022/08/02 23:17: > > > Hmm, > > > > > > I am really sorry for this, I'd messed up a lot somehow. > > > > > > I'll take a deeper look tomorrow morning, but from a quick look: > > > - webkit is now being built against the new icu, passed on i686 of> > architectures, it'll hopefully be done before the next compose. > > > > So looks like the rebuild of webkit2gtk3 won't finish on s390x - > > even after 51 hours: > > > > https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=90394095 > > > > The above link says there are multiple buildroots. What does it mean? > > s390x build is killed and repeated due to some specific issue on > > s390x server? > > usually the build killed and restarted due OOM, but this is weird as > Michael's previous build finished in ~6 hours > > Looking at this system, I do not see any oom occuring. The build is chugging away on this system but the s390x builders are 2CPU and 12 GB per system. -- Stephen Smoogen, Red Hat Automotive Let us be kind to one another, for most of us are fighting a hard battle. -- Ian MacClaren ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: [rawhide] ICU upgrade to 71.1
On Thu, 4 Aug 2022 23:46:44 +0900 Mamoru TASAKA wrote: > Frantisek Zatloukal wrote on 2022/08/02 23:17: > > Hmm, > > > > I am really sorry for this, I'd messed up a lot somehow. > > > > I'll take a deeper look tomorrow morning, but from a quick look: > > - webkit is now being built against the new icu, passed on i686 of> > > architectures, it'll hopefully be done before the next compose. > > So looks like the rebuild of webkit2gtk3 won't finish on s390x - > even after 51 hours: > > https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=90394095 > > The above link says there are multiple buildroots. What does it mean? > s390x build is killed and repeated due to some specific issue on > s390x server? usually the build killed and restarted due OOM, but this is weird as Michael's previous build finished in ~6 hours Dan > Regards, > Mamoru > > > > On Tue, Aug 2, 2022 at 4:04 PM Stephen Gallagher > > wrote: > > > >> On Mon, Aug 1, 2022 at 6:04 PM Frantisek Zatloukal > >> wrote: > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> On Mon, Aug 1, 2022 at 7:46 PM Stephen Gallagher > >> wrote: > > On Mon, Aug 1, 2022 at 5:20 AM Frantisek Zatloukal > >> wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > Later today, I'll be starting with rebuilds of packages depending on > >> icu. The rebuilds will take place in f37-build-side-55935 for all packages > >> returned by sudo repoquery --whatrequires 'libicu*.so.69()(64bit)' (list > >> attached at the end of the message). > > > > Please, if you're going to make changes in affected packages before > >> the side tag gets merged, make the build in the said side tag. I expect to > >> merge the side tag with most of the affected packages built and then > >> continue building things that take longer to build (webkit/libreoffice) > >> later. > > > > For stuff that may fail to build, either due to newer icu or > >> unrelated issues, there is a libicu69 compat package already available in > >> rawhide, so that should take care of FTI issues that'd arise by merging the > >> side tag. I'll try to help the maintainers with fixing the issues. > > > > I'll post updates to this thread as I progress with the bump. > > > > [0] > ... > > v8 > >>> > >>> > >>> Yeah, I did a bunch of manual editing/checking up in the list, this > >> should actually be v8-314. > >> > >> > >> Apparently this side-tag has been merged and it broke a lot of stuff > >> in Rawhide/ELN: > >> > >> 2022-08-02 13:20:21 [ERROR ] Dependency check failed: > >> 2022-08-02 13:20:21 [ERROR ] Problem 1: package > >> anaconda-install-img-deps-37.11-2.eln120.ppc64le requires brltty, but > >> none of the providers can be installed > >> 2022-08-02 13:20:21 [ERROR ] - conflicting requests > >> 2022-08-02 13:20:21 [ERROR ] - nothing provides > >> libicuuc.so.69()(64bit) needed by brltty-6.5-4.eln120.ppc64le > >> 2022-08-02 13:20:21 [ERROR ] Problem 2: package > >> anaconda-widgets-37.11-2.eln120.ppc64le requires > >> libgdk-3.so.0()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed > >> 2022-08-02 13:20:21 [ERROR ] - package > >> anaconda-widgets-37.11-2.eln120.ppc64le requires > >> libgtk-3.so.0()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed > >> 2022-08-02 13:20:21 [ERROR ] - package > >> gtk3-3.24.34-2.eln120.ppc64le requires > >> libtracker-sparql-3.0.so.0()(64bit), but none of the providers can be > >> installed > >> 2022-08-02 13:20:21 [ERROR ] - conflicting requests > >> 2022-08-02 13:20:21 [ERROR ] - nothing provides > >> libicui18n.so.69()(64bit) needed by > >> libtracker-sparql-3.4.0~alpha-3.eln121.ppc64le > >> 2022-08-02 13:20:21 [ERROR ] - nothing provides > >> libicuuc.so.69()(64bit) needed by > >> libtracker-sparql-3.4.0~alpha-3.eln121.ppc64le > >> 2022-08-02 13:20:21 [ERROR ] Problem 3: package > >> nm-connection-editor-1.28.0-2.eln120.ppc64le requires > >> libgdk-3.so.0()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed > >> 2022-08-02 13:20:21 [ERROR ] - package > >> nm-connection-editor-1.28.0-2.eln120.ppc64le requires > >> libgtk-3.so.0()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed > >> 2022-08-02 13:20:21 [ERROR ] - package > >> gtk3-3.24.34-2.eln120.ppc64le requires > >> libtracker-sparql-3.0.so.0()(64bit), but none of the providers can be > >> installed > >> 2022-08-02 13:20:21 [ERROR ] - conflicting requests > >> 2022-08-02 13:20:21 [ERROR ] - nothing provides > >> libicui18n.so.69()(64bit) needed by > >> libtracker-sparql-3.4.0~alpha-3.eln121.ppc64le > >> 2022-08-02 13:20:21 [ERROR ] - nothing provides > >> libicuuc.so.69()(64bit) needed by > >> libtracker-sparql-3.4.0~alpha-3.eln121.ppc64le > >> 2022-08-02 13:20:21 [ERROR ] Problem 4: package > >> anaconda-gui-37.11-2.eln120.ppc64le requires yelp, but none of the > >> providers can be installed > >> 2022-08-02 13:20:21 [ERROR ] - package > >> anaconda-37.11-2.eln120.ppc64le requires anaconda-gui = > >> 37.11-2.eln120, but none
Re: [rawhide] ICU upgrade to 71.1
Frantisek Zatloukal wrote on 2022/08/02 23:17: Hmm, I am really sorry for this, I'd messed up a lot somehow. I'll take a deeper look tomorrow morning, but from a quick look: - webkit is now being built against the new icu, passed on i686 of> architectures, it'll hopefully be done before the next compose. So looks like the rebuild of webkit2gtk3 won't finish on s390x - even after 51 hours: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=90394095 The above link says there are multiple buildroots. What does it mean? s390x build is killed and repeated due to some specific issue on s390x server? Regards, Mamoru On Tue, Aug 2, 2022 at 4:04 PM Stephen Gallagher wrote: On Mon, Aug 1, 2022 at 6:04 PM Frantisek Zatloukal wrote: On Mon, Aug 1, 2022 at 7:46 PM Stephen Gallagher wrote: On Mon, Aug 1, 2022 at 5:20 AM Frantisek Zatloukal wrote: Hi, Later today, I'll be starting with rebuilds of packages depending on icu. The rebuilds will take place in f37-build-side-55935 for all packages returned by sudo repoquery --whatrequires 'libicu*.so.69()(64bit)' (list attached at the end of the message). Please, if you're going to make changes in affected packages before the side tag gets merged, make the build in the said side tag. I expect to merge the side tag with most of the affected packages built and then continue building things that take longer to build (webkit/libreoffice) later. For stuff that may fail to build, either due to newer icu or unrelated issues, there is a libicu69 compat package already available in rawhide, so that should take care of FTI issues that'd arise by merging the side tag. I'll try to help the maintainers with fixing the issues. I'll post updates to this thread as I progress with the bump. [0] ... v8 Yeah, I did a bunch of manual editing/checking up in the list, this should actually be v8-314. Apparently this side-tag has been merged and it broke a lot of stuff in Rawhide/ELN: 2022-08-02 13:20:21 [ERROR ] Dependency check failed: 2022-08-02 13:20:21 [ERROR ] Problem 1: package anaconda-install-img-deps-37.11-2.eln120.ppc64le requires brltty, but none of the providers can be installed 2022-08-02 13:20:21 [ERROR ] - conflicting requests 2022-08-02 13:20:21 [ERROR ] - nothing provides libicuuc.so.69()(64bit) needed by brltty-6.5-4.eln120.ppc64le 2022-08-02 13:20:21 [ERROR ] Problem 2: package anaconda-widgets-37.11-2.eln120.ppc64le requires libgdk-3.so.0()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed 2022-08-02 13:20:21 [ERROR ] - package anaconda-widgets-37.11-2.eln120.ppc64le requires libgtk-3.so.0()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed 2022-08-02 13:20:21 [ERROR ] - package gtk3-3.24.34-2.eln120.ppc64le requires libtracker-sparql-3.0.so.0()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed 2022-08-02 13:20:21 [ERROR ] - conflicting requests 2022-08-02 13:20:21 [ERROR ] - nothing provides libicui18n.so.69()(64bit) needed by libtracker-sparql-3.4.0~alpha-3.eln121.ppc64le 2022-08-02 13:20:21 [ERROR ] - nothing provides libicuuc.so.69()(64bit) needed by libtracker-sparql-3.4.0~alpha-3.eln121.ppc64le 2022-08-02 13:20:21 [ERROR ] Problem 3: package nm-connection-editor-1.28.0-2.eln120.ppc64le requires libgdk-3.so.0()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed 2022-08-02 13:20:21 [ERROR ] - package nm-connection-editor-1.28.0-2.eln120.ppc64le requires libgtk-3.so.0()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed 2022-08-02 13:20:21 [ERROR ] - package gtk3-3.24.34-2.eln120.ppc64le requires libtracker-sparql-3.0.so.0()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed 2022-08-02 13:20:21 [ERROR ] - conflicting requests 2022-08-02 13:20:21 [ERROR ] - nothing provides libicui18n.so.69()(64bit) needed by libtracker-sparql-3.4.0~alpha-3.eln121.ppc64le 2022-08-02 13:20:21 [ERROR ] - nothing provides libicuuc.so.69()(64bit) needed by libtracker-sparql-3.4.0~alpha-3.eln121.ppc64le 2022-08-02 13:20:21 [ERROR ] Problem 4: package anaconda-gui-37.11-2.eln120.ppc64le requires yelp, but none of the providers can be installed 2022-08-02 13:20:21 [ERROR ] - package anaconda-37.11-2.eln120.ppc64le requires anaconda-gui = 37.11-2.eln120, but none of the providers can be installed 2022-08-02 13:20:21 [ERROR ] - package yelp-2:42.1-4.eln120.ppc64le requires libwebkit2gtk-4.1.so.0()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed 2022-08-02 13:20:21 [ERROR ] - conflicting requests 2022-08-02 13:20:21 [ERROR ] - nothing provides libicui18n.so.69()(64bit) needed by webkit2gtk4.1-2.37.1-11.fc37.ppc64le 2022-08-02 13:20:21 [ERROR ] - nothing provides libicuuc.so.69()(64bit) needed by webkit2gtk4.1-2.37.1-11.fc37.ppc64le 2022-08-02 13:20:21 [ERROR ] Problem 5: package mutter-43~alpha-2.eln120.ppc64le requires gtk3(ppc-64) >= 3.19.8, but none of the providers can be installed 2022-08-02 13:20:21 [ERROR ] - package mutter-43~alpha-2.eln120.ppc64le
Re: [rawhide] ICU upgrade to 71.1
Hmm, I am really sorry for this, I'd messed up a lot somehow. I'll take a deeper look tomorrow morning, but from a quick look: - webkit is now being built against the new icu, passed on i686 of architectures, it'll hopefully be done before the next compose. - brltty was FTBFS before, however, the issue looks like the fallout from java/i386 [0] - libtracker-sparql was built against the new icu before the side tag merge, so that should be a transient issue? [0] https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=89758377=DEFAULT=build.log=-4000 File not found: /builddir/build/BUILDROOT/brltty-6.5-5.fc37.i386/usr/lib/brltty/libbrlapi_java.so File not found: /builddir/build/BUILDROOT/brltty-6.5-5.fc37.i386/usr/lib/java/brlapi.jar On Tue, Aug 2, 2022 at 4:04 PM Stephen Gallagher wrote: > On Mon, Aug 1, 2022 at 6:04 PM Frantisek Zatloukal > wrote: > > > > > > > > On Mon, Aug 1, 2022 at 7:46 PM Stephen Gallagher > wrote: > >> > >> On Mon, Aug 1, 2022 at 5:20 AM Frantisek Zatloukal > wrote: > >> > > >> > Hi, > >> > > >> > Later today, I'll be starting with rebuilds of packages depending on > icu. The rebuilds will take place in f37-build-side-55935 for all packages > returned by sudo repoquery --whatrequires 'libicu*.so.69()(64bit)' (list > attached at the end of the message). > >> > > >> > Please, if you're going to make changes in affected packages before > the side tag gets merged, make the build in the said side tag. I expect to > merge the side tag with most of the affected packages built and then > continue building things that take longer to build (webkit/libreoffice) > later. > >> > > >> > For stuff that may fail to build, either due to newer icu or > unrelated issues, there is a libicu69 compat package already available in > rawhide, so that should take care of FTI issues that'd arise by merging the > side tag. I'll try to help the maintainers with fixing the issues. > >> > > >> > I'll post updates to this thread as I progress with the bump. > >> > > >> > [0] > >> ... > >> > v8 > > > > > > Yeah, I did a bunch of manual editing/checking up in the list, this > should actually be v8-314. > > > Apparently this side-tag has been merged and it broke a lot of stuff > in Rawhide/ELN: > > 2022-08-02 13:20:21 [ERROR ] Dependency check failed: > 2022-08-02 13:20:21 [ERROR ] Problem 1: package > anaconda-install-img-deps-37.11-2.eln120.ppc64le requires brltty, but > none of the providers can be installed > 2022-08-02 13:20:21 [ERROR ] - conflicting requests > 2022-08-02 13:20:21 [ERROR ] - nothing provides > libicuuc.so.69()(64bit) needed by brltty-6.5-4.eln120.ppc64le > 2022-08-02 13:20:21 [ERROR ] Problem 2: package > anaconda-widgets-37.11-2.eln120.ppc64le requires > libgdk-3.so.0()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed > 2022-08-02 13:20:21 [ERROR ] - package > anaconda-widgets-37.11-2.eln120.ppc64le requires > libgtk-3.so.0()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed > 2022-08-02 13:20:21 [ERROR ] - package > gtk3-3.24.34-2.eln120.ppc64le requires > libtracker-sparql-3.0.so.0()(64bit), but none of the providers can be > installed > 2022-08-02 13:20:21 [ERROR ] - conflicting requests > 2022-08-02 13:20:21 [ERROR ] - nothing provides > libicui18n.so.69()(64bit) needed by > libtracker-sparql-3.4.0~alpha-3.eln121.ppc64le > 2022-08-02 13:20:21 [ERROR ] - nothing provides > libicuuc.so.69()(64bit) needed by > libtracker-sparql-3.4.0~alpha-3.eln121.ppc64le > 2022-08-02 13:20:21 [ERROR ] Problem 3: package > nm-connection-editor-1.28.0-2.eln120.ppc64le requires > libgdk-3.so.0()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed > 2022-08-02 13:20:21 [ERROR ] - package > nm-connection-editor-1.28.0-2.eln120.ppc64le requires > libgtk-3.so.0()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed > 2022-08-02 13:20:21 [ERROR ] - package > gtk3-3.24.34-2.eln120.ppc64le requires > libtracker-sparql-3.0.so.0()(64bit), but none of the providers can be > installed > 2022-08-02 13:20:21 [ERROR ] - conflicting requests > 2022-08-02 13:20:21 [ERROR ] - nothing provides > libicui18n.so.69()(64bit) needed by > libtracker-sparql-3.4.0~alpha-3.eln121.ppc64le > 2022-08-02 13:20:21 [ERROR ] - nothing provides > libicuuc.so.69()(64bit) needed by > libtracker-sparql-3.4.0~alpha-3.eln121.ppc64le > 2022-08-02 13:20:21 [ERROR ] Problem 4: package > anaconda-gui-37.11-2.eln120.ppc64le requires yelp, but none of the > providers can be installed > 2022-08-02 13:20:21 [ERROR ] - package > anaconda-37.11-2.eln120.ppc64le requires anaconda-gui = > 37.11-2.eln120, but none of the providers can be installed > 2022-08-02 13:20:21 [ERROR ] - package > yelp-2:42.1-4.eln120.ppc64le requires libwebkit2gtk-4.1.so.0()(64bit), > but none of the providers can be installed > 2022-08-02 13:20:21 [ERROR ] - conflicting requests > 2022-08-02 13:20:21 [ERROR ] - nothing provides > libicui18n.so.69()(64bit) needed by >
Re: [rawhide] ICU upgrade to 71.1
On Tue, Aug 2, 2022 at 4:03 PM Stephen Gallagher wrote: > On Mon, Aug 1, 2022 at 6:04 PM Frantisek Zatloukal > wrote: > > > > > > > > On Mon, Aug 1, 2022 at 7:46 PM Stephen Gallagher > wrote: > >> > >> On Mon, Aug 1, 2022 at 5:20 AM Frantisek Zatloukal > wrote: > >> > > >> > Hi, > >> > > >> > Later today, I'll be starting with rebuilds of packages depending on > icu. The rebuilds will take place in f37-build-side-55935 for all packages > returned by sudo repoquery --whatrequires 'libicu*.so.69()(64bit)' (list > attached at the end of the message). > >> > > >> > Please, if you're going to make changes in affected packages before > the side tag gets merged, make the build in the said side tag. I expect to > merge the side tag with most of the affected packages built and then > continue building things that take longer to build (webkit/libreoffice) > later. > >> > > >> > For stuff that may fail to build, either due to newer icu or > unrelated issues, there is a libicu69 compat package already available in > rawhide, so that should take care of FTI issues that'd arise by merging the > side tag. I'll try to help the maintainers with fixing the issues. > >> > > >> > I'll post updates to this thread as I progress with the bump. > >> > > >> > [0] > >> ... > >> > v8 > > > > > > Yeah, I did a bunch of manual editing/checking up in the list, this > should actually be v8-314. > > > Apparently this side-tag has been merged and it broke a lot of stuff > in Rawhide/ELN: > I believe Frantisek did a compat package which allowed the side tag to be merged early while some rebuilds were still in progress. I guess maybe it's missing from the ELN package set and needs to be added? It should be this package: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/packageinfo?packageID=35857 -- Hope this helps, Kalev ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: [rawhide] ICU upgrade to 71.1
On Mon, Aug 1, 2022 at 6:04 PM Frantisek Zatloukal wrote: > > > > On Mon, Aug 1, 2022 at 7:46 PM Stephen Gallagher wrote: >> >> On Mon, Aug 1, 2022 at 5:20 AM Frantisek Zatloukal >> wrote: >> > >> > Hi, >> > >> > Later today, I'll be starting with rebuilds of packages depending on icu. >> > The rebuilds will take place in f37-build-side-55935 for all packages >> > returned by sudo repoquery --whatrequires 'libicu*.so.69()(64bit)' (list >> > attached at the end of the message). >> > >> > Please, if you're going to make changes in affected packages before the >> > side tag gets merged, make the build in the said side tag. I expect to >> > merge the side tag with most of the affected packages built and then >> > continue building things that take longer to build (webkit/libreoffice) >> > later. >> > >> > For stuff that may fail to build, either due to newer icu or unrelated >> > issues, there is a libicu69 compat package already available in rawhide, >> > so that should take care of FTI issues that'd arise by merging the side >> > tag. I'll try to help the maintainers with fixing the issues. >> > >> > I'll post updates to this thread as I progress with the bump. >> > >> > [0] >> ... >> > v8 > > > Yeah, I did a bunch of manual editing/checking up in the list, this should > actually be v8-314. Apparently this side-tag has been merged and it broke a lot of stuff in Rawhide/ELN: 2022-08-02 13:20:21 [ERROR ] Dependency check failed: 2022-08-02 13:20:21 [ERROR ] Problem 1: package anaconda-install-img-deps-37.11-2.eln120.ppc64le requires brltty, but none of the providers can be installed 2022-08-02 13:20:21 [ERROR ] - conflicting requests 2022-08-02 13:20:21 [ERROR ] - nothing provides libicuuc.so.69()(64bit) needed by brltty-6.5-4.eln120.ppc64le 2022-08-02 13:20:21 [ERROR ] Problem 2: package anaconda-widgets-37.11-2.eln120.ppc64le requires libgdk-3.so.0()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed 2022-08-02 13:20:21 [ERROR ] - package anaconda-widgets-37.11-2.eln120.ppc64le requires libgtk-3.so.0()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed 2022-08-02 13:20:21 [ERROR ] - package gtk3-3.24.34-2.eln120.ppc64le requires libtracker-sparql-3.0.so.0()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed 2022-08-02 13:20:21 [ERROR ] - conflicting requests 2022-08-02 13:20:21 [ERROR ] - nothing provides libicui18n.so.69()(64bit) needed by libtracker-sparql-3.4.0~alpha-3.eln121.ppc64le 2022-08-02 13:20:21 [ERROR ] - nothing provides libicuuc.so.69()(64bit) needed by libtracker-sparql-3.4.0~alpha-3.eln121.ppc64le 2022-08-02 13:20:21 [ERROR ] Problem 3: package nm-connection-editor-1.28.0-2.eln120.ppc64le requires libgdk-3.so.0()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed 2022-08-02 13:20:21 [ERROR ] - package nm-connection-editor-1.28.0-2.eln120.ppc64le requires libgtk-3.so.0()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed 2022-08-02 13:20:21 [ERROR ] - package gtk3-3.24.34-2.eln120.ppc64le requires libtracker-sparql-3.0.so.0()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed 2022-08-02 13:20:21 [ERROR ] - conflicting requests 2022-08-02 13:20:21 [ERROR ] - nothing provides libicui18n.so.69()(64bit) needed by libtracker-sparql-3.4.0~alpha-3.eln121.ppc64le 2022-08-02 13:20:21 [ERROR ] - nothing provides libicuuc.so.69()(64bit) needed by libtracker-sparql-3.4.0~alpha-3.eln121.ppc64le 2022-08-02 13:20:21 [ERROR ] Problem 4: package anaconda-gui-37.11-2.eln120.ppc64le requires yelp, but none of the providers can be installed 2022-08-02 13:20:21 [ERROR ] - package anaconda-37.11-2.eln120.ppc64le requires anaconda-gui = 37.11-2.eln120, but none of the providers can be installed 2022-08-02 13:20:21 [ERROR ] - package yelp-2:42.1-4.eln120.ppc64le requires libwebkit2gtk-4.1.so.0()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed 2022-08-02 13:20:21 [ERROR ] - conflicting requests 2022-08-02 13:20:21 [ERROR ] - nothing provides libicui18n.so.69()(64bit) needed by webkit2gtk4.1-2.37.1-11.fc37.ppc64le 2022-08-02 13:20:21 [ERROR ] - nothing provides libicuuc.so.69()(64bit) needed by webkit2gtk4.1-2.37.1-11.fc37.ppc64le 2022-08-02 13:20:21 [ERROR ] Problem 5: package mutter-43~alpha-2.eln120.ppc64le requires gtk3(ppc-64) >= 3.19.8, but none of the providers can be installed 2022-08-02 13:20:21 [ERROR ] - package mutter-43~alpha-2.eln120.ppc64le requires libgdk-3.so.0()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed 2022-08-02 13:20:21 [ERROR ] - package mutter-43~alpha-2.eln120.ppc64le requires libgtk-3.so.0()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed 2022-08-02 13:20:21 [ERROR ] - package gnome-kiosk-42.0-3.eln120.ppc64le requires libmutter-11.so.0()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed 2022-08-02 13:20:21 [ERROR ] - package gnome-kiosk-42.0-3.eln120.ppc64le requires libmutter-clutter-11.so.0()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed 2022-08-02
Re: [rawhide] ICU upgrade to 71.1
On Mon, Aug 1, 2022 at 7:46 PM Stephen Gallagher wrote: > On Mon, Aug 1, 2022 at 5:20 AM Frantisek Zatloukal > wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > Later today, I'll be starting with rebuilds of packages depending on > icu. The rebuilds will take place in f37-build-side-55935 for all packages > returned by sudo repoquery --whatrequires 'libicu*.so.69()(64bit)' (list > attached at the end of the message). > > > > Please, if you're going to make changes in affected packages before the > side tag gets merged, make the build in the said side tag. I expect to > merge the side tag with most of the affected packages built and then > continue building things that take longer to build (webkit/libreoffice) > later. > > > > For stuff that may fail to build, either due to newer icu or unrelated > issues, there is a libicu69 compat package already available in rawhide, so > that should take care of FTI issues that'd arise by merging the side tag. > I'll try to help the maintainers with fixing the issues. > > > > I'll post updates to this thread as I progress with the bump. > > > > [0] > ... > > v8 > Yeah, I did a bunch of manual editing/checking up in the list, this should actually be v8-314. -- Best regards / S pozdravem, František Zatloukal Senior Quality Engineer Red Hat ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: [rawhide] ICU upgrade to 71.1
On Mon, Aug 1, 2022 at 5:20 AM Frantisek Zatloukal wrote: > > Hi, > > Later today, I'll be starting with rebuilds of packages depending on icu. The > rebuilds will take place in f37-build-side-55935 for all packages returned by > sudo repoquery --whatrequires 'libicu*.so.69()(64bit)' (list attached at the > end of the message). > > Please, if you're going to make changes in affected packages before the side > tag gets merged, make the build in the said side tag. I expect to merge the > side tag with most of the affected packages built and then continue building > things that take longer to build (webkit/libreoffice) later. > > For stuff that may fail to build, either due to newer icu or unrelated > issues, there is a libicu69 compat package already available in rawhide, so > that should take care of FTI issues that'd arise by merging the side tag. > I'll try to help the maintainers with fixing the issues. > > I'll post updates to this thread as I progress with the bump. > > [0] ... > v8 How did you generate this list? The `v8` package has been retired from Fedora in favor of using the one from Node.js for years now. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[rawhide] ICU upgrade to 71.1
Hi, Later today, I'll be starting with rebuilds of packages depending on icu. The rebuilds will take place in f37-build-side-55935 for all packages returned by sudo repoquery --whatrequires 'libicu*.so.69()(64bit)' (list attached at the end of the message). Please, if you're going to make changes in affected packages before the side tag gets merged, make the build in the said side tag. I expect to merge the side tag with most of the affected packages built and then continue building things that take longer to build (webkit/libreoffice) later. For stuff that may fail to build, either due to newer icu or unrelated issues, there is a libicu69 compat package already available in rawhide, so that should take care of FTI issues that'd arise by merging the side tag. I'll try to help the maintainers with fixing the issues. I'll post updates to this thread as I progress with the bump. [0] 0ad 389-ds-base bes boost brltty calamares calibre ceph cfdg community-mysql cyrus-imapd darktable dee deepin-editor deepin-system-monitor dino dovecot dovecot-fts-xapian enchant2 evolution-data-server focuswriter freeciv freerdp geary gnome-text-editor gnucash gnustep-base gspell harfbuzz ibus-qt idzebra imv kbibtex kdb libcdr libe-book libical libkiwix liblcf libmspub libphonenumber libqalculate libqxp libreoffice libtoml libtranslit libvisio libzmf maim mapnik mongo-c-driver mozjs68 mozjs91 msort ncid ncmpcpp nuspell opentrep openttd php php-pecl-http plasma-workspace poedit postfix postgresql prelude-lml prosody pyicu python-mapnik qt5-qtbase qt5-qtlocation qt5-qtwebengine qt5-qtwebkit qt6-qt5compat qt6-qtbase R R-stringi raptor2 rpminspect samba scribus seamonkey slop sword tarantool tesseract texlive tin tracker tracker-miners unar v8 vte291 webkit2gtk3 widelands xalan-c xfsprogs xiphos yaz yaz zimlib znc -- Best regards / S pozdravem, František Zatloukal Senior Quality Engineer Red Hat ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
