On Mon, 22 Oct 2012 12:04:59 -0400
Matthew Miller mat...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
Bug here, with no response:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=861970
Gavin isn't responding to bugs or to email.
Note that also note that Jaroslav Škarvada has an updated package in
testing, has
If anyone would like to take over any of these packages, please let
me know.
I will also take squeak-image
thanks regards
Jaroslav
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On Mon, 22 Oct 2012 17:17:53 -0400 (EDT)
Jaroslav Skarvada jskar...@redhat.com wrote:
If anyone would like to take over any of these packages, please let
me know.
I will also take squeak-image
Done.
kevin
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
--
devel mailing list
Hi,
I'm currently trying to get OSGi metadata added to the cglib and
jfreechart packages. Unfortunately I've heard no response for ~3 weeks.
Does anybody know how to contact him (bug-email of maintainer CC'd)?
I'm willing to take ownership/co-maintenance of cglib and jfreechart,
fwiw.
Bugzilla
On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 4:22 AM, Severin Gehwolf sgehw...@redhat.com wrote:
Hi,
I'm currently trying to get OSGi metadata added to the cglib and
jfreechart packages. Unfortunately I've heard no response for ~3 weeks.
Does anybody know how to contact him (bug-email of maintainer CC'd)?
I'm
Hello,
Currently there are no working pdns (PowerDNS) builds for Fedora 18,
because the maintainer is unavailable. 3 weeks ago I sent an email to
the maintainer (Ruben), but so far no response. Yesterday, I sent him an
email if he accepted me as co-maintainer for pdns, but again, no
On Fri, 14 Sep 2012, Morten Stevens wrote:
Currently there are no working pdns (PowerDNS) builds for Fedora 18, because
the maintainer is unavailable. 3 weeks ago I sent an email to the maintainer
(Ruben), but so far no response. Yesterday, I sent him an email if he
accepted me as
Hi,
Does someone know how to contact lkundrak ? I have requested a jgraphx
update (scilab dependency) for months.
Account Name:
lkundrak
Full Name:
Lubomir Rintel
Email:
lkund...@v3.sk
IRC Nick:
lkundrak
Account Status:
Active
Bug: (open 2011-10-15, ping 2011-10-24,
On Tue, 2012-03-20 at 13:37 +0100, Clément David wrote:
Hi,
Does someone know how to contact lkundrak ?
$ ./fedora_active_user.py --user lkundrak --email lkund...@v3.sk
Last login in FAS:
lkundrak 2012-03-20
Last action on koji:
Tue, 21 Feb 2012 package list entry created:
On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 7:46 AM, Pierre-Yves Chibon pin...@pingoured.fr wrote:
On Tue, 2012-03-20 at 13:37 +0100, Clément David wrote:
Hi,
Does someone know how to contact lkundrak ?
$ ./fedora_active_user.py --user lkundrak --email lkund...@v3.sk
Last login in FAS:
lkundrak 2012-03-20
Hi,
Right, it was busy. I got the ACLs for co-maintaining jgraphx now.
PS: that was just a gentle ACLs reminder :)
Clément
Le 20/03/2012 13:50, Jon Ciesla a écrit :
On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 7:46 AM, Pierre-Yves Chibon pin...@pingoured.fr
wrote:
On Tue, 2012-03-20 at 13:37 +0100, Clément
On Mon, 2011-12-05 at 23:08 +0100, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
(download via git clone
http://ambre.pingoured.fr/cgit/fedora-misc.git/ )
Move to its own repo on:
http://ambre.pingoured.fr/cgit/fedora-active-user.git/
Mirrored on github at:
https://github.com/pypingou/fedora-active-user
Pierre
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 05/12/11 23:08, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
Hi,
Once in a while comes back the question: is insert nick here
around ? Normally followed by: I have opened and pinged him
several time on bugzilla #/email/irc/insert what I missed here.
Great
2011/12/5 Pierre-Yves Chibon pin...@pingoured.fr:
- koji ➙ last build...
This doesn't seem to work correctly. My last build was 2 days ago:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/userinfo?userID=988
And the script says it was Nov 2...
Otherwise a great start :)
Thanks,
Tom
--
devel mailing
On Tue, 2011-12-06 at 11:07 +0100, Thomas Spura wrote:
2011/12/5 Pierre-Yves Chibon pin...@pingoured.fr:
- koji ➙ last build...
This doesn't seem to work correctly. My last build was 2 days ago:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/userinfo?userID=988
And the script says it was Nov 2...
On Tue, 2011-12-06 at 10:18 +0100, Matthias Runge wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 05/12/11 23:08, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
Hi,
Once in a while comes back the question: is insert nick here
around ? Normally followed by: I have opened and pinged him
several
On Tue, 6 Dec 2011 10:26:00 +
Daniel P. Berrange berra...@redhat.com wrote:
It might be interesting to run this script across every single user
in the Fedora accounts system, and proactively identify any users
whom have not done anything in Fedora for a period longer than say
6-9 months.
On 12/06/2011 05:26 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Mon, Dec 05, 2011 at 11:08:32PM +0100, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
snip
It might be interesting to run this script across every single user
in the Fedora accounts system, and proactively identify any users
whom have not done anything in Fedora
On Tue, 2011-12-06 at 10:53 -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
But this might find some people who were active in say bugzilla but
missed the fas changes, etc.
Just for reference, the bugzilla check doesn't work on F16, something
changed between the version 0.6.0 and 0.6.2 and what's returned has
On Tue, 2011-12-06 at 13:52 -0500, Clyde E. Kunkel wrote:
On 12/06/2011 05:26 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Mon, Dec 05, 2011 at 11:08:32PM +0100, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
snip
It might be interesting to run this script across every single user
in the Fedora accounts system, and
2011/12/6 Kevin Fenzi ke...@scrye.com:
On Tue, 6 Dec 2011 10:26:00 +
Daniel P. Berrange berra...@redhat.com wrote:
It might be interesting to run this script across every single user
in the Fedora accounts system, and proactively identify any users
whom have not done anything in Fedora
On Tue, Dec 06, 2011 at 09:44:33PM +0100, Thomas Spura wrote:
2011/12/6 Kevin Fenzi ke...@scrye.com:
On Tue, 6 Dec 2011 10:26:00 +
Daniel P. Berrange berra...@redhat.com wrote:
It might be interesting to run this script across every single user
in the Fedora accounts system, and
Hi,
Once in a while comes back the question: is insert nick here
around ?
Normally followed by: I have opened and pinged him several time on
bugzilla #/email/irc/insert what I missed here.
And there the hunt for the last trace of activity starts. Some days ago
someone on the list was asking if
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=614982
Bug 614982 depends on bug 611015, which changed state.
Bug 611015 Summary: perl-Pugs-Compiler-Rule fails to build
. According to Koji, his last
activity was a rebuild of the mumble package, dated September 12.
In accordance with the Fedora Non-responsive Maintainer Policy [4], does
anyone know an alternative method to contact Andreas?
Thank you, and regards.
[1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=720544
[3] shows his current status as Active. According to Koji, his last
activity was a rebuild of the mumble package, dated September 12.
In accordance with the Fedora Non-responsive Maintainer Policy [4], does
anyone know an alternative method to contact Andreas?
Thank you, and regards.
[1
On 09/14/2011 02:57 PM, Andreas Osowski wrote:
Hello all,
sorry for this small hassle,
I was planning to answer Peter's last e-mail tomorrow as I was unable to do
so today.
@Peter: The update is the first thing on my todo list for tomorrow together
with a rebuild of mumble for F16
Hi,
I'm following
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Policy_for_nonresponsive_package_maintainers
It seems gouldwp is non-responsive.
User: gouldwp,
Name: None,
email: w...@gouldfamily.org,
Creation: 2008-01-19,
Status: active
Approved Groups: cla_fpca cla_fedora fedorabugs cla_done packager
* Bug
Hi,
It seems gouldwp is non-responsive.
User: gouldwp,
Name: None,
email: w...@gouldfamily.org,
Creation: 2008-01-19,
Status: active
Approved Groups: cla_fpca cla_fedora fedorabugs cla_done packager
Bug (open 2011-08-06, ping 2011-08-25)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=728665
On Sat, 09 Apr 2011 11:14:54 -0700
Christopher Aillon cail...@redhat.com wrote:
On 11/15/2010 08:57 AM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
On Mon, 15 Nov 2010 05:16:43 -0500 (EST)
Jaroslav Skarvadajskar...@redhat.com wrote:
Please could any FESCo member approve the takeover of rrdtool
(according to
On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 11:53:41AM -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
On Sat, 09 Apr 2011 11:14:54 -0700
Christopher Aillon cail...@redhat.com wrote:
I'd like to propose we orphan all his packages.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/users/packages/kaboom as
nothing's really changed since the
koji build is well over a year ago.[8]
* Google searches don't turn up anything on him in a few years, save for
this non-responsive maintainer thread.
[1]
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/buglist.cgi?quicksearch=221344,485364,593629,622075,631091,632434,646466,672646
[2] https://bugzilla.redhat.com
Per
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=663151
I've not received any response in my attempts to make contact over the past
couple of months, and would ask FESCo to approve my taking ownership.
-- Rex
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
On Mon, 24 Jan 2011 07:58:43 -0600
Rex Dieter rdie...@math.unl.edu wrote:
Per
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=663151
I've not received any response in my attempts to make contact over
the past couple of months, and would ask FESCo to approve my taking
ownership.
I'll approve
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I've been trying to contact the maintainer of pysvn for a few weeks
(Since December 14th) but have not received a reply. According to Koji,
the owner (ravenoak) has not been active since July. I'd like to
formally request being added as a comaintainer
Anyone know how to contact Scott Baker, maintainer of qcomicbook? I've been
attempting to contact him for a couple of months, and have started the non-
responsive maintainer policy,
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=663151
-- Rex
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=614982
Iain Arnell iarn...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
On Sat, 20 Nov 2010 07:14:41 +0100
Jan Kratochvil jan.kratoch...@redhat.com wrote:
Hello,
filed month+ ago:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=643296
Simple fix of memory corruption affecting various applications incl.
Firefox.
Completed Policy for nonresponsive package
On Sat, 2010-11-20 at 14:52 -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
On Sat, 20 Nov 2010 07:14:41 +0100
Jan Kratochvil jan.kratoch...@redhat.com wrote:
Hello,
filed month+ ago:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=643296
Simple fix of memory corruption affecting various applications
On Sat, 20 Nov 2010 22:52:51 +0100, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
but I think it might be good to get a few
motivated maintainers for the fedora package.
Also think so.
Twinkle sound is choppy when using pulseaudio, the details are not important
here as I have not even filed it when the pulseaudio Bugs
Hi,
On Sat, Nov 20, 2010 at 4:52 PM, Kevin Fenzi ke...@scrye.com wrote:
filed month+ ago:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=643296
Simple fix of memory corruption affecting various applications incl.
Firefox.
Completed Policy for nonresponsive package maintainers there, got
On Sun, 21 Nov 2010 01:52:02 +0100, Ray Strode wrote:
On Sat, Nov 20, 2010 at 4:52 PM, Kevin Fenzi ke...@scrye.com wrote:
Completed Policy for nonresponsive package maintainers there, got an
off-list reply but still no fix commit or commit rights approval.
Lennart is surely around...
I
Ray Strode wrote:
I wonder if the nonresponsive package maintainers policy should have a
provision for ping maintainer on irc
Most (potentially) nonresponsive folks aren't even on IRC in the first
place.
(Lennart is, though. His IRC nick is mezcalero.)
Kevin Kofler
--
devel mailing
Hello,
filed month+ ago:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=643296
Simple fix of memory corruption affecting various applications incl. Firefox.
Completed Policy for nonresponsive package maintainers there, got an
off-list reply but still no fix commit or commit rights
On Mon, 15 Nov 2010 05:16:43 -0500 (EST)
Jaroslav Skarvada jskar...@redhat.com wrote:
Please could any FESCo member approve the takeover of rrdtool
(according to nonresponsive package maintainers policy)? Or should I
open ticket for this?
I'll approve it and orphan rrdtool.
Were you going
I'll approve it and orphan rrdtool.
Were you going to take the EPEL branches as well?
Thanks, taken all
Jaroslav
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
it in RHEL). I think all steps in
non-responsive maintainer process have been fulfilled
Jaroslav
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On Nov 10, 2010, at 5:54 AM, Jaroslav Skarvada wrote:
Hi,
I was unsuccessful in all attempts to contact Chris Ricker (kaboom AT
oobleck.net). He seems non-responsive for a long time, I did not receive any
reply from him at least from February.
Tracker bug:
Hi,
I was unsuccessful in all attempts to contact Chris Ricker (kaboom AT
oobleck.net). He seems non-responsive for a long time, I did not receive any
reply from him at least from February.
Tracker bug:
http://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=554334
Previous attempt to contact through
It's been since July,
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492218
( and recently,
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=579548#c12 )
and previously,
https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/2009-September/msg01223.html
where Callum suggested dropping his maintainer duties
W dniu 11.09.2010 20:53, Julian Sikorski pisze:
Dear all,
I unfortunately have to start the non-responsive process for thomasvs
again [1]. The bug to update twisted to the latest upstream version has
been opened for several months now [2], and I have also prepared the
updates myself on a
Dear all,
I unfortunately have to start the non-responsive process for thomasvs
again [1]. The bug to update twisted to the latest upstream version has
been opened for several months now [2], and I have also prepared the
updates myself on a fedorapeople repo [3]. In the bug report, all
responses
Dear all,
I unfortunately have to start the non-responsive process for thomasvs
again [1]. The bug to update twisted to the latest upstream version has
been opened for several months now [2], and I have also prepared the
updates myself on a fedorapeople repo [3].In the bug report, all
responses
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=614982
Bug 614982 depends on bug 611015, which changed state.
Bug 611015 Summary: perl-Pugs-Compiler-Rule fails to build
On Sun, Aug 8, 2010 at 3:39 PM, Robert Scheck rob...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
Hi,
as per non-responsive maintainer policy at
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Policy_for_nonresponsive_package_maintainers
I have filed:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=600992
Does somebody know
Am Montag, den 09.08.2010, 09:46 -0400 schrieb Deji Akingunola:
While the truth is you never contacted me by email, and you went ahead
threatening me with AWOL policy and orphaning all my packages just 2
weeks after filing a bug for package upgrade on EPEL 4.
The truth is that the bug 600992
Robert Scheck wrote, at 08/09/2010 04:39 AM +9:00:
Hi,
as per non-responsive maintainer policy at
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Policy_for_nonresponsive_package_maintainers
I have filed:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=600992
Does somebody know how to contact Deji
On Sun, Aug 8, 2010 at 4:12 PM, Mamoru Tasaka wrote:
Robert Scheck wrote, at 08/09/2010 04:39 AM +9:00:
Hi,
as per non-responsive maintainer policy at
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Policy_for_nonresponsive_package_maintainers
I have filed:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi
On Sun, Aug 08, 2010 at 09:39:44PM +0200, Robert Scheck wrote:
Hi,
as per non-responsive maintainer policy at
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Policy_for_nonresponsive_package_maintainers
I have filed:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=600992
Imho the bug report should
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=614982
--- Comment #4 from Steven Pritchard st...@silug.org 2010-08-01 18:54:15 EDT
---
I'm still here.
I've looked at the package to
On 07/07/10 20:16, Thomas Spura wrote:
To get such a button, to apply for becoming real maintainership makes
this possible and is the easiest way, because it doesn't need e.g. a
fast track procedure or anyone agreeing from fesco or anyone to change
it manually in pkgdb.
When you have
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=614980
Iain Arnell iarn...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=614980
--- Comment #1 from Chris Weyl cw...@alumni.drew.edu 2010-07-23 13:33:24 EDT
---
I'm going to be (and have been) rather busy
On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 1:17 AM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
On Wed, 14 Jul 2010 20:42:57 -0400
Orcan Ogetbil wrote:
I have got news. The other day, my ACL request (that I made last
year!) for F-10 was approved by ixs. 1 minute later, it was set back
to Awaiting Review.
Anyone have any idea of
On Fri, 23 Jul 2010, Orcan Ogetbil wrote:
I sent him an email as you asked, once again. And didn't get a
response, once again.
Good morning. Sorry for the non-responsiveness. Work has been kinda taxing
for some time now... Someone pointed me at the discussion here.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: non-responsive maintainer
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=614980
Summary: non-responsive maintainer
Product: Fedora
Version
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=614982
Iain Arnell iarn...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: non-responsive maintainer
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=614982
Summary: non-responsive maintainer
Product: Fedora
Version
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=614981
Iain Arnell iarn...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=614980
Iain Arnell iarn...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=614981
Bug 614981 depends on bug 539046, which changed state.
Bug 539046 Summary: FTBFS perl-Test-AutoBuild-1.2.2-9.fc12
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=614981
Daniel Berrange berra...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
On Mon, Jul 5, 2010 at 7:05 PM, Orcan Ogetbil wrote:
On Mon, Jul 5, 2010 at 6:17 PM, Michel Alexandre Salim wrote:
Hi all,
I'm initiating a fast track procedure for libsndfile -- a security bug
has been reported for over a year, and there has been no response from
maintainer
We made many
On Wed, 07 Jul 2010 01:53:29 +0200, Kevin wrote:
Kevin Fenzi wrote:
If some provenpackager want's to maintain it, why don't they take
ownership?
Because I can fix the occasional broken dependency, [...]
... which hopefully will not be a problem anymore with a revised
push process. You
Am Wed, 07 Jul 2010 01:46:44 +0200
schrieb Kevin Kofler kevin.kof...@chello.at:
Thomas Spura wrote:
For me it doesn't make much sense to be co-maintainer everywhere,
but actually:
1. doing all the tasks alone.
I don't see the big problem. I'm comaintaining a few packages in
that way
On Tuesday, July 06, 2010 01:05:57 Orcan Ogetbil wrote:
On Mon, Jul 5, 2010 at 6:17 PM, Michel Alexandre Salim wrote:
Hi all,
I'm initiating a fast track procedure for libsndfile -- a security bug
has been reported for over a year, and there has been no response from
maintainer
I've
On Tue, Jul 06, 2010 at 09:21:29AM +1000, Chris Jones wrote:
This seems to be happening a lot lately regarding maintainers and/or
co-maintainers losing interest in their projects somewhere along the
line and just stopping development without any warning and
notification to other members who
sorry for being offline. had some longer trouble in real life and am now
wading through lots of mails which piled up since some weeks.
pushed that package.
what is the correct way for being unavailable?
is a vacation message ok, or would we spam our mailinglists?
as far as i remember vacation
On Tue, Jul 6, 2010 at 6:32 PM, Sven Lankes s...@lank.es wrote:
Maybe we could tweak the pkgdb in a way that a co-maintainer request
would automatically be granted if it isn't answered within a long enough
timeframe (say 8 weeks).
That way packages with AWOL maintainers could grow
On Tue, Jul 06, 2010 at 10:51:37AM +0200, josef radinger wrote:
sorry for being offline. had some longer trouble in real life and am now
wading through lots of mails which piled up since some weeks.
Welcome back.
what is the correct way for being unavailable?
is a vacation message ok, or
On Tue, Jul 6, 2010 at 6:32 PM, Sven Lankes s...@lank.es wrote:
Maybe we could tweak the pkgdb in a way that a co-maintainer request
would automatically be granted if it isn't answered within a long enough
timeframe (say 8 weeks).
That way packages with AWOL maintainers could
On Tue, 2010-07-06 at 10:51 +0200, josef radinger wrote:
sorry for being offline. had some longer trouble in real life and am
now
wading through lots of mails which piled up since some weeks.
Good to hear you are back :-)
Pierre
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
On Tue, Jul 06, 2010 at 10:32:06AM +0200, Sven Lankes wrote:
On Tue, Jul 06, 2010 at 09:21:29AM +1000, Chris Jones wrote:
This seems to be happening a lot lately regarding maintainers and/or
co-maintainers losing interest in their projects somewhere along the
line and just stopping
Am Tue, 6 Jul 2010 10:57:06 +0100
schrieb Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com:
On Tue, Jul 06, 2010 at 10:32:06AM +0200, Sven Lankes wrote:
On Tue, Jul 06, 2010 at 09:21:29AM +1000, Chris Jones wrote:
This seems to be happening a lot lately regarding maintainers
and/or co-maintainers
On Tue, Jul 06, 2010 at 01:26:21PM +0200, Thomas Spura wrote:
If this is implemented, the 'next' co-maintainer should become the real
maintainer after another 8 weeks non-commiting by the former maintainer.
I think this is another problem with pkgdb or Fedora. Why is there a
maintainer
On Tue, Jul 06, 2010 at 01:39:43PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
I think this is another problem with pkgdb or Fedora. Why is there a
maintainer (owner?) and co-maintainers, rather than just having all
co-maintainers be equal?
Because this ensures that there is a well defined person who
On Tue, 6 Jul 2010 13:39:43 +0100, Richard wrote:
So I think it's valid for packages to have 0, 1, 2, or more
maintainers.
Why 0? Who will be notified about bugzilla tickets? Who will receive
mail sent to the PACKAGE-owner Fedora e-mail alias?
For each package in the collection, there ought
On Tue, Jul 6, 2010 at 10:44 AM, Michael Schwendt wrote:
On Tue, 6 Jul 2010 13:39:43 +0100, Richard wrote:
So I think it's valid for packages to have 0, 1, 2, or more
maintainers.
Why 0? Who will be notified about bugzilla tickets? Who will receive
mail sent to the PACKAGE-owner Fedora
On Tue, Jul 06, 2010 at 10:54:29AM -0400, Orcan Ogetbil wrote:
On Tue, Jul 6, 2010 at 10:44 AM, Michael Schwendt wrote:
On Tue, 6 Jul 2010 13:39:43 +0100, Richard wrote:
So I think it's valid for packages to have 0, 1, 2, or more
maintainers.
Why 0? Who will be notified about bugzilla
On Tue, Jul 06, 2010 at 12:31:32PM +0300, Alexander Kurtakov wrote:
On Tue, Jul 6, 2010 at 6:32 PM, Sven Lankes s...@lank.es wrote:
Maybe we could tweak the pkgdb in a way that a co-maintainer request
would automatically be granted if it isn't answered within a long enough
On Tue, Jul 06, 2010 at 12:00:23PM -0400, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
If anyone wants to help code this, I think the way to do it is to implement
an events queue in pkgdb. With the queue we can do two things -- first,
have the pkgdb send nagmail when an acl request has not been answered.
second
On Tue, 6 Jul 2010 09:21:29 +1000
Chris Jones chrisjo...@comcen.com.au wrote:
This seems to be happening a lot lately regarding maintainers and/or
co-maintainers losing interest in their projects somewhere along the
line and just stopping development without any warning and
notification to
On Tue, 6 Jul 2010 13:39:43 +0100
Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com wrote:
On Tue, Jul 06, 2010 at 01:26:21PM +0200, Thomas Spura wrote:
If this is implemented, the 'next' co-maintainer should become the
real maintainer after another 8 weeks non-commiting by the former
maintainer.
I
Sven Lankes wrote:
Maybe we could tweak the pkgdb in a way that a co-maintainer request
would automatically be granted if it isn't answered within a long enough
timeframe (say 8 weeks).
That way packages with AWOL maintainers could grow co-maintainers
without going through the complicated
Thomas Spura wrote:
For me it doesn't make much sense to be co-maintainer everywhere, but
actually:
1. doing all the tasks alone.
I don't see the big problem. I'm comaintaining a few packages in that way
for a while (xchat and mingw32-nsis come to my mind) and that just works
(though I do
Till Maas wrote:
We can use uberpackagers ;-) or maybe package-monkeys, make it a SIG
and then it is afaik already covered by Fedora procedures, because a SIG
or group of packagers can own a package, like e.g. the lvm-team.
Orcan, Richard, who else is in?
As an inclusionist and someone who
Kevin Fenzi wrote:
On Tue, 6 Jul 2010 13:39:43 +0100
Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com wrote:
If #maintainers == 0 then the package is either just sitting there (as
long as there are no serious bugs), or is being best-effort maintained
by provenpackagers, at least until that becomes a
On Wed, Jul 7, 2010 at 9:43 AM, Kevin Kofler kevin.kof...@chello.at wrote:
And IMHO 8 weeks is too much, it should be somewhere between 2 and 4.
Kevin Kofler
I initially thought 8 weeks was too long also, but I guess people have
busy lifestyles. 4 weeks is probably more realistic.
Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
I think this is another problem with pkgdb or Fedora. Why is there a
maintainer (owner?) and co-maintainers, rather than just having all
co-maintainers be equal?
Good point. I think, just like you, that there should be a list of owners
rather than just 1 owner.
As
On Wed, 2010-07-07 at 01:46 +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote:
(BTW, it's quite funny that the main GTK+-based IRC client is maintained
almost exclusively by a KDE SIG member. ;-) )
Well, I use the xchat-gnome fork. I suspect quite a lot of other GNOME-y
folks do...that one's maintained by Brian
701 - 800 of 879 matches
Mail list logo
