Re: OO updates - no presto support?

2010-12-05 Thread Gilboa Davara
On Sat, 2010-12-04 at 19:00 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
 On 12/04/2010 06:54 PM, Gilboa Davara wrote:
  Hello all,
 
  I've noticed that since the release of F14 a fairly large [1] number of
  OO updates came down the wire - non of them in deltarpm/presto form
  (read: a 100MB download per release).
 
  Is it bug or intended behavior?
  If its a bug, wouldn't it be wise to hold off on releasing
  non-security-fixes until its resolved?
 
  FWIW, I'm on Fedora 14, x86_64.
 
 It is a bug.  Refer to
 
 http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/users/2010-November/387625.html
 
 Rahul
 

Thanks.
The ML post quite thin on details, any idea if this has been reported on
bugzilla?

- Gilboa

-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel


OO updates - no presto support?

2010-12-04 Thread Gilboa Davara
Hello all,

I've noticed that since the release of F14 a fairly large [1] number of
OO updates came down the wire - non of them in deltarpm/presto form
(read: a 100MB download per release).

Is it bug or intended behavior?
If its a bug, wouldn't it be wise to hold off on releasing
non-security-fixes until its resolved?

FWIW, I'm on Fedora 14, x86_64.

- Gilboa
[1]
$ cat /var/log/yum.log | grep openoffice.org-core | grep fc14
Nov 09 11:12:38 Updated: 1:openoffice.org-core-3.3.0-13.3.fc14.x86_64
Nov 21 13:35:30 Updated: 1:openoffice.org-core-3.3.0-14.1.fc14.x86_64
Nov 24 09:18:57 Updated: 1:openoffice.org-core-3.3.0-15.2.fc14.x86_64
Dec 04 14:02:43 Updated: 1:openoffice.org-core-3.3.0-17.2.fc14.x86_64


-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel


Re: OO updates - no presto support?

2010-12-04 Thread Rahul Sundaram
On 12/04/2010 06:54 PM, Gilboa Davara wrote:
 Hello all,

 I've noticed that since the release of F14 a fairly large [1] number of
 OO updates came down the wire - non of them in deltarpm/presto form
 (read: a 100MB download per release).

 Is it bug or intended behavior?
 If its a bug, wouldn't it be wise to hold off on releasing
 non-security-fixes until its resolved?

 FWIW, I'm on Fedora 14, x86_64.

It is a bug.  Refer to

http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/users/2010-November/387625.html

Rahul


-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel